1,979 words
Died Suddenly, the freely available anti-vax documentary produced by radio personality Stew Peters, promotes three theses regarding the COVID-19 vaccine: It’s both dangerous and deadly; our leaders have been dishonest about it; and it is part of a nefarious plan hatched by the world elite to depopulate the planet. The first thesis is a slam dunk, the second is a successful throw from the foul line, and the third resembles a three-point shot rattling off the rim. If you’re a believer from the anti-vax choir going into this documentary, you will be even more so coming out. If you’re a skeptic from the pro-vax crowd, this documentary will do little to persuade you. And if you’re undecided, you will find Died Suddenly compelling enough to warrant more research into this divisive and sometimes maddening topic.
Died Suddenly, directed by Matthew Skow and Nicholas Stumphauzer, is hampered by the filmmakers’ obvious partisan bent. But it rolls out enough unforgettable moments to make a formidable stand against the medical and political forces which insist that COVID vaccines are safe and effective.
The documentary starts in the best possible way: by welcoming us into the unsettling world of embalmers. What an original and powerful take on the COVID vaccine! If the vax is as dangerous as many are saying, wouldn’t embalmers and funeral home directors have noticed a rather uncomfortable uptick in business starting in, say, the spring of 2021? Well, they did. Not only that, many embalmers began to notice something weird about all those fresh cadavers coming their way. It wasn’t so easy to pump embalming fluid through them anymore. This had never happened before. It was almost as if something was blocking the arteries of the deceased.
Well, guess what? There was.
Skow and Stumphauzer interview numerous embalmers who all say the same thing: “white fibrous structures” were occluding arteries and veins, preventing blood flow and likely causing death. The filmmakers provide ample video evidence of these pork rind-like structures, from one embalmer’s mason jar collection to footage of them pulled straight from cadavers. One was three feet long. Others came out in bloody globs. Some look like calamari.
“Most of the people are not autopsied,” says one embalmer. “Therefore, no one will see what I see. . . . The dead cannot speak for themselves, so therefore the only way to bring this forward is that I have to speak for them.”
One after another, embalmers from all over the world attest that in their decades of experience, they have never seen anything like this — and that it all started right after the introduction of the COVID vaccine.
Of course, correlation is not causation, and the filmmakers do not ascertain the vaccination rates of the deceased. So, as sympathetic as these embalmers come across, we must take their testimony with a grain of salt.
Recognizing this, the filmmakers provide us with more salt, showing that the vaccine’s public health threat can come in many forms. According to Lieutenant Colonel Theresa Long:
Insurance companies reported an unexplainable increase in all cause deaths among 18-49 year-olds. Up 40 percent. It’s apocalyptic.
In my 15 years as a doctor taking care of soldiers, I have never seen this litany of debilitating and potential deadly medical conditions in soldiers. These conditions included strokes, transient Ischematic attacks, pericarditis, myocarditis, erratic heart rates, arrythmias, rapid onset cancer, testicular cancer, esophageal cancer, brain tumors, neuroendocrine tumors, spinal tumors, thyroid dysfunction, multiple sclerosis, cognitive impairment, persistent severe insomnia, suppression of the immune system, unprovoked blood clots, avascular necrosis, liver dysfunction, menstrual irregularities, and miscarriages.
Skow and Stumphauzer spend a great deal of time with Long and other whistleblowers who make various claims about how the vaccine causes all sorts of health problems. Also included is horrifying footage of people dropping dead or unconscious all over the world. Several in particular spin like graceless ballet dancers before crashing down.
You can buy Spencer J. Quinn’s Solzhenitsyn and the Right here.
As its title suggests, Died Suddenly does well with its first thesis: the dangerous and oftentimes lethal nature of the COVID vaccine. Of course, it would be unfair to expect a documentary to offer definitive proof of this. How do we know if the people who got sick or died in this film had even been vaccinated? How many times had they been vaccinated, and how many days, weeks, or months prior to their deaths or illnesses? And yes, many of these people were or are in the military, where vaccination was mandated. So there’s that.
The wide net the filmmakers cast regarding the kinds of sickness and death occurring, as well as the suspicious timing of these cases, is persuasive. Their section on the rising rate of stillbirths is especially chilling. Anyone claiming that the vaccine is safe and effective will have to answer to the findings presented in Died Suddenly.
Still, however, Skow and Stumphauzer do not address two pressing questions which could either put their argument over the top or sink it entirely:
- Is the vaccine less dangerous and less deadly than COVID itself?
- Is the vaccine effective for the majority who suffered no adverse events from it?
Without trying to answer these questions, Skow and Stumphauzer leave room for doubt in the minds of skeptics disinclined to follow them down the rocky road of vaccine dissidence. And that’s too bad.
Died Suddenly then presents its second thesis: Governments and cultural elites are being dishonest about the vaccine, in various ways. The subjects themselves discuss it. Celebrities such as Dolly Parton and Stephen Colbert appear in cringy clips promoting the vaccine. And world leaders such as Joe Biden and Justin Trudeau promote it in ways that fly in the face of the events documented in the film.
Then there’s the long segment dedicated to tech tycoon, “Substack journalist,” and overall “disinformation spreader” Steven Kirsch. Kirsch, as an outspoken critic of the vaccine, gained some fame when he offered any medical professional a million dollars to debate the vax with him on the record. According to the film, he had no takers (frankly, I find that hard to believe). Kirsch’s main complaint, however, is that government officials ignore him despite all the noise he makes about the vax.
Kirsch also refers to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERs) a lot, and uses its 15,000 vaccine-related death count to support his claims that the vaccine isn’t what the government says it is. Then the filmmakers do something sneaky. They scroll quickly through a VAERS document from 12 years ago to corroborate Kirsch’s claim that this death tally is “probably underreported by a factor of a hundred.” But the document claims that only 1% of adverse events are reported, which is not the same thing as 1% of deaths being reported — a subtle point which, I’m sure, the filmmakers would rather we not ponder as Kirsch extrapolates using 1.5 million corpses with vermicelli in their veins as a baseline.
I’m sorry, but unless Messrs. Kirsch, Skow, and Stumphauzer can come up with better reasons why the database they invoke is inaccurate by the inverse of two orders of magnitude, all they’re doing is fearmongering. Yes, we know governments, Big Tech, and the mainstream media lie, obfuscate, and censor in relation to the vaccine. Yes, they oppress anti-vax dissenters and resort to medical tyranny. This is common knowledge, and Died Suddenly nicely reinforces this common knowledge. But did it have to fearmonger?
The final thesis of the film — that the COVID vaccine is a bioweapon employed by elites to depopulate the planet — is the biggest stretch. But the filmmakers try to make it less stretchy by including montages of other major incidents which we should also question. These include the JFK assassination, 9/11, MKUltra and Operation Mockingbird, weapons of mass destruction, the Seth Rich murder, the Moon landing, and Bigfoot(!). Yes, the truth is out there, and wherever the truth is, you will also find Bigfoot, apparently.
According to Lieutenant Colonel Pete Chambers:
They don’t want you to know that your body is now their property and playground. And they will do with you what they feel like doing to you. And they will destroy your life if you don’t take a lethal needle in your arm. And it is. It’s the new bullet. It’s the new missile. It’s the new form of warfare. You don’t need to fire a bullet and win a war.
Aside from schismatic assertions like this, here is the evidence the filmmakers present which they allege points to the vax as enemy action:
- Malthusian doomsday predictions by unnamed talking heads going back decades.
- The following quote from Bill Gates: “The world today has 6.8 billion people, that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by ten or 15%.”
- A 1974 paper by Henry Kissinger which stated that the world population needed to decrease.
- Ted Turner on a talk show saying, “We got to stabilize the population. We’re too many people,” and then linking overpopulation to global warming.
- A montage of world leaders calling COVID an opportunity for the Great Reset. These leaders include King Charles, George Soros, Klaus Schwab, and Danish Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen. According to Rasmussen: “This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset. This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to reimagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality, and climate change.”
- The Event 201 Scenario: A simulation pandemic run by “global health institutions” a mere two months before the COVID outbreak.
That’s pretty much it. Kind of a meager hook to hang a ten-gallon hat on, isn’t it?
You can buy Spencer J. Quinn’s novel Charity’s Blade here.
Of course, I am not saying that they’re wrong — how would I know either way? The Event 201 simulation does cast a great deal of suspicion on world leaders, as does the similar “CLADE X” exercise from 2018. Were COVID and the vax planned in advance? Maybe, but Skow and Stumphauzer make a bigger claim than this — and big claims require big evidence. I just don’t see the big evidence coming from Died Suddenly. I see evidence that the vaccine is more dangerous than the world elites let on, but not evidence of intent to murder tens of millions.
I also feel confident in my skepticism because Skow and Stumphauzer ignore another conspiracy theory which, in my opinion, cuts closer to Occam’s Razor. It goes more or less like this: The disease was accidentally released from a Chinese bioweapons lab in 2019 and revealed itself to be a particularly nasty form of the flu. Various high-power elites in the United States saw this as an opportunity to oust President Trump. They intentionally overreacted to COVID by spreading panic and unease in the American population, locking the country down, and wrecking Trump’s excellent economy, thus making American voters more inclined for a change in 2020. Any harmful side effects of the vaccine or lack of efficacy resulted from political pressure which forced researchers to develop it in an extremely short period of time. So, of course we got a bad product. Any talk from Gates, Soros, or Schwab about overpopulation is just that: talk.
I think this theory explains everything more economically than blaming it all on Thanos. It is a little suspicious of the filmmakers that they went all-in on the Thanos theory, and gave no time at all to the Anti-Trump theory. How can you have a program bashing the COVID-19 vaccine and hardly even mention Donald Trump?
Regardless of its shortcomings, however, Died Suddenly remains an intriguing and disturbing documentary. It’s well-paced and smoothly visualized with an eerie, ethereal score that sucks you in. The passion and conviction of the film’s many subjects is a sight to behold as well. Died Suddenly is perhaps not as persuasive as the filmmakers would have liked, but persuasive enough to keep the choir singing, and perhaps now at a greater volume.
* * *
Like all journals of dissident ideas, Counter-Currents depends on the support of readers like you. Help us compete with the censors of the Left and the violent accelerationists of the Right with a donation today. (The easiest way to help is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.)
For other ways to donate, click here.
25 comments
I’ve been a fencesitter when it comes to the vaccines, and that has served me just fine. Not taking it, and then not being vocal about not taking it, seemed like the winning move here.
Those responsible for poisoning us and the children with sometime myocarditis and blood-clot inducing ‘vaccines’ must be held accountable. Our leaders responsible for promoting it must be held accountable. Those responsible for creating the COVID-19 narrative must be held accountable. Justice must be done. If these crimes go unpunished, we forever resign ourselves to bondage.
Umm, how about we hold the Chinese bioweapons developers, and Fauci-funded “gain-of-function” researchers, accountable, the ones, who actually (intentionally or inadvertently) created this lethal virus (and this, as many responsible investigators agree, is most likely the truth, not the early Chinese face-saving propaganda about it’s being some animal virus that made the crossover leap to humans in one of China’s filthy peasant animal-exchange markets), instead of those real scientists who have done their best to combat the plague?
I agree. Those actually responsible for creating this virus should be punished too. However, I don’t have much hope that we will be able to hold the Chinese responsible. The population of that will have to do that themselves.
Kirsch’s $1 million offer to debate is still out there, with no takers.
I haven’t seen the film, or heard of this Kirsch, but I can’t believe that. There must be something more going on about the “offer”.
These jars claimed to be human tissues look like something out of Alien. They look like something hardcore conspiracy types imagine ought to be there. They also resemble clickbaity ads, “You would never believe this is inside you”.
There are some real trends in diseased covid/vax patients I believe, but this sounds dubious.
We’ll probably never know the entire truth about covid. There’s a credible case that it’s not of natural origin. After that it’s hard to know much, but man playing God may well be a factor.
Then it seems likely different forces, perhaps in a loose coalition – united in their hubris if nothing else, took advantage of it for their own ends, rather than it’s one big plot.
I was disappointed to read that Michael Yeadon, the former Pfizer official who seemed to bring a certain amount of credibility to the vax-skeptic side early on, has gone full tard and now believes viruses don’t exist at all.
This is apparently the result of being brainwashed by this Jew Kaufman who’s been pushing this stuff.
When does Yeadon say viruses don’t exist?
A few comments.
First, if the deaths with the weird clots shown in the movie are soldiers, and soldiers were forced to get jabbed, then at least in this population segment, all the clotted are jabbed.
Second, is a similar ‘excess deaths’ count in young cohorts also manifesting in 2020, the year of covid pre-jab? Doesn’t seem so, so one can conclude that either the jab is killing these youngish people in ’21 or that a more deadly strain of covid killed them, or their death was latent due to covid, ie. They got the rona in ’20, it killed them in ’21. I’m leaning towards the jab.
The reviewer states that the filmmakers don’t address the question is the jab deadlier than covid? I think it’s clear where they stand on that question.
Next, if VAERS is underreported by 100x, ie. 1% is reported, it stands to reason that every type of adverse effect is underreported by that same factor, including deaths. So say 100,000 injuries are reported of which 15,000 are fatal, then 10 million injuries actually happened killing 1.5 million jabbed. Everything goes up proportionally.
The documented population control statements by all these world elites is pretty damning, I don’t know what more the reviewer needs, perhaps a signed (in blood) document by all these ghouls stating merely ‘we want to kill all the serfs’?
The Trump argument is weak given he was a huge booster of the jab (still is), he saved millions of lives after all, and he never fired Fauci, Birx, et al.
The jab isn’t ineffective and deadly because it was rushed. No viable vaccine was ever produced after decades of dealing with coronaviruses in the modern vaccine-viable era. The jab is ineffective and deadly because of the mRNA business.
“Next, if VAERS is underreported by 100x, ie. 1% is reported, it stands to reason that every type of adverse effect is underreported by that same factor, including deaths.”
Not necessarily. Suppose we have 1M AEs from a vaccine. Of those, 10K are deaths. Then say 10K (1%) of these AEs are reported and all of them are deaths. Thus you have 1% of the AEs being reported but 100% of the deaths. Hence AE and death reporting are not equivalent. Further, it stands to reason that deaths (the worst AE of them all) are likelier to be reported than mild AEs like headache or sore muscles which eventually go away and are forgotten.
“The documented population control statements by all these world elites is pretty damning,”
Agree, but the filmmakers don’t include other statements from these elites which might offset the statements they do include. Do such statements exist? I’m not saying the filmmakers are wrong on this, just not persuasive to the skeptical.
“The Trump argument is weak given he was a huge booster of the jab (still is), he saved millions of lives after all, and he never fired Fauci, Birx, et al.”
Red herring. According to the theory, the conspirators had their plan on place before Trump could boost or not boost the jab. Anyway the elites did use covid as a weapon against him. This theory is more about covid than the jab, anyway.
OK, your analysis makes sense to me. True, it’s hard to hide a dead body, as it were, so the same reasons why it’s hard to fudge homicide statistics applies here as well, surely. I confess when I see the term ‘underreported’ in the VAERS context, I always assumed underreported by the authorities themselves, ie. not entering the numbers after being notified by doctors or family or whomever. I didn’t think it meant reports by victims (or in the case of death, their family/doctor).
Thank you for your reply.
There are multiple types of “The Jab”. Lot of mRNA paranoia here but the J&J vaccine is not mRNA and has the biggest chance of serious side FX.
VAERS is data but not ‘quality’ data that is vetted but getting the full story. To put it in counter currents terms, its likely going to a website and seeing how many people found a ‘noose’ vs. someone going out to verify said ‘noose’.
The Covid vaccine was bad enough. Couldn’t you have left pork rinds, calamari, and vermicelli out of it?
There are also reports from oncologists of stable B-Cell cancers and melanoma being triggered after vaccination.
Now that you mention it, I read this the other day:
https://thewhiterose.uk/resigned-slovenian-head-nurse-30-are-vaccinated-with-placebo/
According to what that says – make of it what you will – there are three types of bottles: 1) a placebo shot for the elites, 2) the actual mRNA vaccine, and 3) a shot with a carcinogenic genetic warhead.
Wouldn’t it be a hoot if it is true but someone at the factory got bottles 1 and 3 mixed up?
The problem isn’t Malthusianism, it’s White Genocide. I am very frustrated with the way that many vax skeptics choose to present the issue. Which populations are having the jabs forced on them the most? If this is an act of 5th-gen war, as the filmmakers seem to assert, then on whom is it being waged? It seems irresponsible not to lead with that.
The fact that world elites organized “Event 201” in October 2019, in which they simulated a massive, ostensibly hypothetical, pandemic, during which they mandated subsequent lockdowns and the eventual pushing of a vaccine on the populace (all due to some infection that happened to be called “coronavirus”)… is just a coincidence, I’m sure.
Thanks for reviewing this documentary which I have not yet watched.
There has certainly been ample foreshadowing of a viral pandemic, from Bill Gates and Dr Fauci’s “there will be a pandemic” statement early in Trump’s reign to the 2017 SPARS exercise at Johns Hopkins; then there is the testimony of virologists about the artificial nature of the pathogen and the evidence of US involvement in overseas viral labs, to implicate a faction of the zio-global power elite in manufacuring this whole event.
From my own fairly extensive reading I would say there is enough evidence to demand doubting the mainstream narrative on everything from JFK to the Apollo missions. If something as frivolous as ‘Bigfoot’ was really included in this film one ought to ask why? It could just be a bridge too far but there is a Cass Sunstein cognitive infiltration flavour to it and it may be there to subtly discredit the ideas in the documentary, especially the aforementioned,much-lampooned but well-attested conspiracies.
There’s absolutely nothing out of the ordinary for authorities to warn about a big incoming pandemic. They’ve been constantly warning about “the big one” for at least three decades (that’s how back my personal recollection goes, at any case). Remember how Swine Flu, the first SARS, Ebola, etc were originally approached? Yeah, those ended up being minor, but the possibility of a huge pandemic was never outside of health authority’s discourse for as long as I can remember.
If anything, those who get payed for preventing and managing pandemics sudently shutting up about imminent doom a couple of months before COVID would have been more conspicuous…
Spencer Quinn is a huge asset to CC. One can always discern a high intelligence behind his clear and measured prose, and this review is no exception. I think I’ll watch this documentary just to be able to pose some questions to an old and experienced doctor I’m seeing next week.
But as I’ve said previously in vaxx-related comments, one must be careful in going against the scientific consensus, for both public health and ideological public relations reasons. Using Ockham’s Razor-ish arguments, as well as commonsense (which is no longer as common as it was, even in my own lifetime), one must ask: how likely is it that the overwhelming bulk of the scientific and medical establishments everywhere are wrong wrt Covid vaccines (ie, that their effectiveness outweighs any associated risks)? What is their incentive for dishonesty? And note: there is no single “they” (a fact which always upends, and therefore is invariably ignored by, the conspiracist mind). Health establishments all over the world agree (as far as I’m aware) that Covid is viral in origin (even if there is tremendous disagreement wrt whether natural or human causes produced C19), and that the vaccines reduce mortality. Has this been proven to be untrue? What about the alleged reduction in elderly mortality from Covid when comparing the periods pre- and post-vaccine, or in rates of death at all ages between the vaccinated and unvaccinated? Have these findings been demonstrated to be faulty?
What is likely (though this is just my inexpert opinion) is that the vaccines, unbeknownst to their developers, and in spite of the initial safety verification testing that was expedited, did slightly raise mortality (ie, above what it otherwise would have been) among vaccinated young people, and that it’s definitely debatable whether this increase outweighed the benefit to young people (especially those with no comorbidities) from vaccination against Covid, given that the Covid mortality rate (putting aside the unresolved issue of “long Covid” and its attendant miseries) among the young has from the outset been recognized to be extremely low. Maybe if I were young, I would avoid vaccination, and just accept that I would eventually get a nasty flu-like bout of Covid, after which I’d be fine.
But even if this is the truth, it’s hardly a massive indictment of a global health establishment fighting a pandemic under rapidly evolving conditions, in terms of both the pandemic’s effects, and science’s understanding of the virus, let alone evidence of conspiratorial malice. Why must scientists be assumed to be perfect? That has never been the case. The fact of adverse side effects does not negate the value of vaccination.
Science is self-correcting, and especially when dealing with life and death issues (as opposed to areas like race and gender where there’s “wiggle-room” to be woke without causing mass deaths), the incentives, moral and racial/national (for nonwhite countries at least, ones whose governments actually care about their people’s well-being either due to basic ethical concern, or, in dictatorships like Russia and China, because regime hard power is related to population health and size), as well as individual-financial, to uncover sources of harm are tremendous. Does no scientist seek personal renown (and lucrative book and perhaps movie deals), such as would come his way from proving that Covid vaccines are more dangerous than Covid itself?
I cannot accept that any of my doctors, or couple of friends who are doctors, are part of some conspiracy to harm people, let alone depopulate the planet (which, incidentally, is a real issue and need, at least to anyone who has studied simple population ecology; I suggest beginning one’s eco-awakening with Garrett Hardin, Living Within Limits [1993]). These are very smart (I am bright enough to attest to that) as well as decent people. I’m certain if they thought the vaccines were as dangerous as some claim, they would advise caution or avoidance. As a non-virologist, what else can I reasonably do, anyway, than trust experts who have given me no reason to distrust them?
There is also the larger issue of the PR of anti-vaccine hostility. The Racial Right, as much or more than any other sectarian political tendency, is grounded in physical reality as discerned by science (and often in scientific investigation that wasn’t originally directed towards uncovering racial truths at all). It is the racial egalitarians who are anti-scientific utopians, positing the essential equality and even fungibility of races without the slightest empirical evidence (indeed, where all such evidence contradicts their bromides). For us to inject (unwarranted, I think) epistemological nihilist objections into the movement’s appreciation for science is to undermine much of the basis for our beliefs. We shouldn’t be like the Left, trumpeting scientific findings which bolster some of our beliefs, while ignoring those which cut against others. Of course, we still have non-biological justice claims on our side (ie, that the system is increasingly rigged against whites, and that we are victims of genuine racial oppression), as well as the evidence of social science (eg, interracial disparities in crime rates). But science is our ultimate trump card (and, I strongly suspect, will become more so in the future, as science demonstrates ever more powerfully the extent to which racial disparities in behavior and life outcomes statistically correlate with genetic differences between the races; also, as genetic similarity theory develops, undermining the entire theory of “diversity” as an unproblematic or even optimum biosocial state).
“Trust the (self-appointed) experts…why would they lie to us??”
Dear Lord, you must be joking.
You must be very young. Or else you didn’t really read my lengthy comment.
Your comment is in the realm of TLDR considering that you didn’t even bother to watch the film, i.e., the topic of this article. I would also expect a regular reader of this site to have been savvy enough to have seen how heavily politicized the entire vaccination situation was–it reached a fever pitch of mass hysteria, and many people were cajoled into getting the shot by their employers even if they didn’t really want to take it. TPTB made obtaining objective information during the pandemic deliberately difficult.
“Various high-power elites in the United States saw this as an opportunity to oust President Trump. They intentionally overreacted to COVID by spreading panic and unease in the American population, locking the country down, and wrecking Trump’s excellent economy, thus making American voters more inclined for a change in 2020.”
An alternative explanation could be that Wall Street again tanked the economy and again needed a huge bail-out from the Fed.
A few months before the Covid panic Wall Street had again overextended themselves and needed the Fed to bail them out. The Fed was quietly giving them money but with the amounts involved it wouldn’t stay quiet for long. Once the people realized Wall Street was once again putting the country into even further debt in order to bail out the banks and oligarchs all hell would break loose.
What to do? What to do?
Then Covid hit. It was the perfect smoke screen. Get everyone to laser focus on Covid then shut everything down. People are going to need money to survive so have the government pay out a stimulus which includes payments to businesses for lost income and wages. Then nobody even notices the $trillions that have been going out the back door and into the waiting pockets of the hedgefunds and banks. People just think it’s another part of the stimulus program.
In this light, the hysterical response by the government and media over Covid makes sense. Follow the money.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnmauldin/2020/01/02/the-fed-has-quietly-started-qe4/?sh=3261fa083768
https://www.mauldineconomics.com/frontlinethoughts/decoding-the-fed?utm_campaign=JM-305&utm_content=wrp3xvkz&utm_medium=ED&utm_source=for#repo
The TLDR of all this is that the WHOLE reason for the Covid freakout and lockdown was to create a smokescreen to hide the bailout that the Fed had been providing Wallstreet starting several months BEFORE Covid was noticed.
It was inevitable that their crime would be exposed so when Covid came along they glommed onto it realizing that if they blew it up into a major global panic nobody would even notice the money they’d been pilfering from the taxpayer. Furthermore they could continue pilfering under the claim of protecting the economy.
It’s a brilliantly devious scheme.
Always follow the money.
I’m all for being mindful of world overpopulation, but controlling population is not an idea spoken much by the Left because the conversation gets uncomfortable quickly when you look at the numbers. The left media is sort of gloating how men of the right are disproportionately dying of covid in areas that are anti-vax (link below). How’s that for depopulating the base most likely to vote? People have been dropping dead suddenly all over the world since time immemorial. Look up sudden cardiac death or various drugs of abuse. Dr. Long needs to furnish some actual data if she doesn’t want to appear a crackpot.
In the very unlikely scenario that the vaccine were to actually cause this litany of horrors, any number of epidemiologists around the world will be able to show it and become one of the most famous (and likely rich) people in the world. As someone commented above, medicine is self correcting. Look up thalidomide, Vioxx, Fen-Phen, DES. There is reason to be suspicious of the claims or a drug from any one company. But when many different entities find something similar, the convergent findings carries real weight and that goes for positive or negatives. Scientists are not looking to go along with the herd. They are motivated to discover something outside the mainstream and tell them they were wrong… Much glory comes with that, but they have be correct in the end to get that attention.
All over this website I see people gloating about Western civilization discovered this or that, but all of sudden we don’t like that we invented vaccines, which have been of the greatest improvements in human health this side of sanitation and clean water. A bunch of endless deniers will not create a thriving identity group.
If you are worried about mRNA there are now ‘old school’ vaccines such as Novavax. Pretty much all vaccines have some risk of anaphylaxis or GBS, and the risk for covid vaccine is 1 in 20000. Your lifetime risk of dying in a car crash is 1 in 100, 1 in 1000 to drown, 1 in 93 for suicide and 1 in 12 for covid (most of that for old folks). The average risk of dying in a car crash in the next year is 1 in 8527. And then there are the talking heads in this documentary, scant on stats.
https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/all-injuries/preventable-death-overview/odds-of-dying/
https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj-2021-069308.abstract
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/covid-death-rates-higher-republicans-democrats-why-rcna50883
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.