Counter-Currents
2,661 words
What kind of violent future awaits your offspring? — Tommy Robinson & Peter McLoughlin, Mohammed’s Koran: Why Muslims Kill for Islam
Tommy Robinson divides many people, including some on the Dissident Right. A potent mixture of activist, firebrand, citizen journalist, and reluctant rabble-rouser, Robinson has gone against the grain, defying the mainstream media, the police, Muslim activists, and the deep state for years to report on Islam in general and Muslim grooming gangs in particular. His new documentary, The Rape of Britain, can be seen here.
The scandal of what have become known in the United Kingdom as “Muslim grooming gangs” or, to the mainstream media, just plain “grooming gangs,” is to my mind the most disgusting and disgraceful act of an establishment that has made clear — and not just through this one cover-up — that it intends Muslims to be the new masters in Britain. Whether this takes the form of micro-caliphates — which already exist de facto — or some kind of wider transition of cultural and political power takes place (as in Michel Houellebecq’s novel Submission), the Islamization of Britain, to whatever degree, seems to be its share of the Great Reset.
There is something very dark about the whole affair. This is not the result of incompetence, nor is it a concern with “ethnic tensions” — always a convenient get-out. Muslim grooming gangs are a subsection of jihad. Victorious chieftains and his men would take a village’s women once the village had been vanquished in battle. Now, in many English towns, we merely adjust for the time difference. In this documentary we additionally see that the grooming gangs and the police appear to work too well together not to be working together.
While Robinson may be familiar to Americans, this documentary’s context is exhaustively given in Peter McLoughlin’s Easy Meat: The Story of Britain’s Grooming Gangs. Robinson went on to co-author a book with McLoughlin, Mohammed’s Koran: Why Muslims Kill for Islam. This places the Koran in temporal order, and is a good way to approach a rather dull and violent book, one which should nevertheless be read.
McLoughlin’s book on the gangs is tough reading. The shock comes not — or not only — from the callous contempt and violent disregard which these Pakistani heritage men display towards what for them are the spoils of war, but the scale of the public sector cover-up, the way the media looked away, and the way that justice was denied to indigenous British families and perverted the better to safeguard those who the police are duty-bound to protect: Muslims.
With the McLoughlin book as a backdrop, Robinson’s documentary is allowed to focus on a specific case, and a young lady named Nicole from Telford in England is interviewed at length. She is 22 now, with children, but she was first forced to have sex with one of the Pakistani men who had employed her when she was just 11. This exclusivity and narrow subject matter make the video more striking, because the viewer realizes they are not watching an account of a black swan event, but a tawdry tale that may have been — and may still be — repeated many thousands of times across England.
Over the following few years, Nicole was repeatedly raped by many men, effectively being pimped out, and stresses that the sexual act was always accompanied by violence and insults. She was beaten and repeatedly referred to as “the white bitch.” One of the men got her pregnant and was traced via DNA. This clear evidence joined the string of what are called “NFAs”: No further action.
The police, the judicial system, and the media also game any just recourse the victims might have. They rejected the claims by many of the girls and their families when they were first made. Apologists cued up to say that any ethnic prevalence among these gangs was irrelevant, and that it was rather proof of “toxic masculinity.” The public was warned, as always, against Islamophobia, the Islamic get-out clause. 16 men — 15 Muslims and a Sikh — were arrested in connection with child grooming, and only one of them was prosecuted, the Sikh. An enquiry was set up, but one of the stipulations of such an enquiry is that the accuser must be known to the accused. As we will see, Telford is a place where you don’t want anyone to have a personal grudge against you. In Britain, these are the new badlands.
Telford is a town in the English county of Shropshire which played a small part in the Industrial Revolution, leading to the renaming of the town after the great bridge-builder Thomas Telford. Now, in our new demographic revolution, and like so many northern towns, it is becoming a Muslim ghetto. I saw this happen in Newham, east London. I travelled through this district regularly 20 years ago and saw plenty of white faces, then returned 15 years later to find myself one of the only ones. The same thing happened in and around Luton, Tommy Robinson’s home town.
You can buy Mark Gullick’s Vanikin in the Underworld here.
Tommy is no longer concerned with street-fighting and football. He tried the mainstream media, many times, and their contempt for him was palpable. He turned to citizen journalism, in connection with which he was jailed. He was sent to Belmarsh Prison, notorious for its Muslim population. He was unable to eat there as the food in the kitchen was prepared by Muslims. This was not due to animosity, but rather fear of poison or other pollution. He lived for ten weeks on a can of tuna and a piece of fruit a day and lost 40 pounds. During one of the hottest months in recent memory, his cell’s window had to be shut fast to prevent passing Muslim prisoners from spitting and pushing feces through it. He was in solitary confinement 23 hours a day.
The fact that he has not faltered says much about the man. As noted, he falls foul of some on the Right, perhaps because of some of his affiliations and the ambiguity some on the Right have about Islam. But instead of chanting and waving his arms in the street in front of a goon squad who adore him, he is seen in the documentary painstakingly assembling databases and collating suspects’ details. An anti-grooming police operation, code-named Chalice, resulted in 11 arrests. Robinson already has 200 names. Two of those names are Gufraz Khan, aka “Bugsy,” and his brother Muhammad Charlie Khan, effectively Nicole’s pimps.
The Khan brothers are typical Pakistanis on the make. Free of the regressive economies and cultures of their own genetic homelands, they revel in the comparative freedoms of the United Kingdom, freedoms enhanced by their being Muslims, which protects them much like Freemasonry. Add to this their adoption of Anglo-Caribbean dress, jewelry, music (despite their own rich pre-Islamic tradition), style of speech, and worship of easily-gained money, and you have a blueprint for a very unpleasant personality type — real toxic masculinity.
Nietzsche wrote in The Antichrist that Islam had every right to despise Christianity, as Islam at least “assumes it is dealing with men.” Well, Europe is getting Islamic men at a steady pace, and so far we have seen its response, which is to bring more. Hubris is rarely so predictable. Once these sexually repressed, aggressive cowboys ride into town, it is the town that changes, not the riders.
These are men who like to be photographed sitting astride the bonnet of an expensive car, Asian gangstas in costly and shapeless designer sweat-wear or poorly worn 1980s suits and ties who are more or less invited to become criminals by the local police. The thug life aside, time is also set by to present a PR façade at the local mosque, where Charlie preaches about, among other things, the evils of pedophilia.
The police not only will have nothing to do with closing down this squalid gang of perverts, they are happy to be shown appreciation for doing that. Nicole identified a police officer who she alleges took an envelope crammed with money from one of the Khan brothers in a restaurant, and as a result of this payment it is alleged that Khan’s impending court case was dropped.
I often wonder what the effect on the mental health of some police officers might be in these times. Those officers who joined the police to prevent crime and help the vulnerable are being prevented from doing so by a chain of command that goes all the way to the top, and it cannot sit easily with all of them. Cognitive dissonance is one thing if you come to the two contradictory beliefs yourself and accept their co-existence, but quite another if you are forced to accept two different realities by another.
In the documentary, Robinson gives the brothers their right to reply, stopping them with a microphone in the street. Robinson has to be very careful. Not only are the police watching his every move, but he is making some bad enemies.
In the days after, Tommy gave the Khan brothers a right to reply on camera. Six cars were fire-bombed or attacked in ten days in and around Telford, one of them Tommy’s, and others belonging to victims — Tommy calls them “survivors” — of the grooming attacks. The police, it goes without saying, made no arrests. When an arrest was actually made in connection with Tommy’s enquiries, it was one of his own surveillance team.
The police superintendent responsible for Telford finally made a statement which at least acknowledged that Tommy Robinson’s “independent enquiry” might be linked to the vehicle attacks. He also adds, twice, that the victims of the attacks are receiving support. No support, it is worth noting, not even basic counselling, was ever offered to Nicole, but she didn’t have the fuel of media attention.
The behavior of the British deep state and its operatives in the near-paramilitary police force show beyond reasonable doubt that governmental priority is to protect and promote Islam and facilitate its advance guard as it strengthens its presence in Europe and the UK. Certain things have happened in the last decade which would not have happened any differently if the government had been preparing a welcome for the new caliphate. Pubs are being closed, mosques are built with increasing frequency, prisons and schools quietly turn their menus halal, thousands of white girls (and some Sikhs) are raped and trafficked by Muslim men with impunity (with the Greater Manchester Police even being bluntly told to look for men “of other ethnicities”), and prayer spaces which are clearly Islamic but masquerade as “multi-faith” are installed at airports. At the border, no effort is made to prevent thousands of co-religionist immigrants joining the advance guard, and lawyers and the British judicial system are seemingly determined both to facilitate immigration and prevent deportation, whatever the value of the social capital that comes from immigration might be. Promoting and facilitating brand Islam — and effectively funding it with tax money — is a priority task for government.
A surprising aspect of the whole affair is the lack of vigilante retribution. It is quite possible, of course, that there has been. If so, the mainstream media would avoid it as assiduously as they did the grooming gangs themselves. And this would not be, as they would say it was, to avoid inspiring copycat attacks, but would come out of a visceral reluctance to show the little people that, when the law not only breaks down but actively works against you, you still wield the power of the personal, street-level, violent vendetta.
The Rape of Britain premiered in Telford last weekend. You may be forgiven for missing it in the newspapers. Part of their animus is stoked by the fact that the mainstream media really don’t like citizen journalists. There is a snobbish, guild-like attitude in the British media that if you haven’t been indoctrinated at journalism school, taught how to write like a third-rate technical engineer, made certain that your liberal-Left bona fides are in order, and shown an ability to understand that certain questions will remain unasked and certain states of affairs unremarked upon, then you don’t belong in the club.
Citizen journalism will become an increasingly knotty problem for the Western globalist elites and their helpers in government. If you are familiar with the increasing persecution of Rebel News — for whom Robinson once worked — in Canada, you will also be aware that there is an establishment mobilization in progress, and its aim is to sanitize the media so that only approved voices are heard.
The change in the media in the last decade is analogous to punk rock. At first, the bands thrashed away on their guitars, yelling into the microphone. Then some of them learnt to play. In two years, The Clash went from White Riot to London Calling. The same thing is happening to citizen journalists. Their production values are now sufficiently good for informational purposes, and don’t require the distracting visual and musical effects the big broadcasters favor. The subject matter is pared down, focused on, and allowed to breathe and inform. There is a human element, too. Robinson’s voice cracks at times with the emotion of what he is talking about. The Rape of Britain’s direction is not intended to tweak your emotions, however. The unadorned style instead allows the emotional message to come through unimpeded. There are no shots of little girls sitting wistfully by windows clutching teddy bears, accompanied by stark piano music. There is simply information given concerning a hideous crime; indeed, a string of hideous crimes hung round old England’s greasy neck.
Almost my lifetime ago, Enoch Powell defined the role of the politician as “the avoidance of preventable evils.” Powell is, of course, persona non grata now among polite political and media circles, those same courtiers who had little to say when politician Naz Shah retweeted (Twitter being today’s oratory) a post which suggested that the girls in towns like Rotherham who accuse others of abuse should “keep their mouths shut for the sake of diversity.” That is the road Britain has travelled in my lifetime.
Perhaps my vision of Islamification is overblown, but there has to be an overarching reason why Muslims are a protected species. The spotlight went off Islam in the UK during the Black Lives Matter tantrums, and it may be that the Muslim Council of Britain will have been pleased with the lack of attention. And this is not simply because it moves the problem of the grooming gangs back into the shadows. It is also because those in charge of British Islam know that the demographic game will not be won in the future because it is already won. Demographics is always about the future when one civilization with a birthrate below the replacement rate is invaded by one with a higher birthrate. Demography really is destiny and, with a religious fervor Christianity long ago grew out of, Muslims are metaphysically equipped to play the long game. As an Afghan fighter reputedly said to an American soldier, you have all the watches, but we have all the time.
How much time does the UK have before its descent into barbarism? If a society can turn away from its most vulnerable members when it is within arm’s reach to help, then that society is in serious trouble. If, moreover, that turning away is done by those specifically tasked — and paid — to do so, then you have to say that the system you are observing is amoral and cannot stand as a civilization worth the name. Those who should defend those unable to defend themselves have ceased being a social asset and have instead become a dangerous liability. If very young girls are collateral in a battle the very existence of which must be kept quiet, then the violent new Middle Ages predicted by Guillaume Faye will come to pass.
More details of the story told in The Rape of Britain can be found at Justice for Nicole.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
28 comments
This video has been removed by the uploader.
We’ve updated the links to the copy of the video that’s on Bitchute.
Thank you for this article and information on this film. I had not heard of this movie (not surprising), though I have never paid much attention to Robinson or his work. Reading this piece was suprisingly hard for me, and it reminded me of other similar betrayals which have happened all over Western Europe. At times I wanted to put it down because of the anger and disgust I felt inside. Is this what college students feel when they read ‘triggering’ literature?
It’s a straightforward racial/ethnic issue.
Either you have to be dishone$t or too intellectually wanting to fit Islam into this issue. In the case of Messers Robinson and McLoughlin, I think both scenarios may be equally applicable.
These South Asian immigrant hyenas targeted White girls because the latter had no tribal and communitarian protection. They knew that if they had preyed on girls with solid male protection around them, they would have been hunted down and hacked into pieces.
There is justified anger and unease within White communities across the Occident. However, actors like Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon aka “Tommy Robinson” have been doing their best to deploy this anger and unease into nonsensical battlefronts.
The “Islam vs White” angle will not cause any harm to Islam but it will wreck the White nationalist cause.
Your gaslighting attempts are lamer even than those of the mainstream media, an extraordinary feat really.
Exactly. It’s just pathetic.
Perhaps my vision of Islamification is overblown, but there has to be an overarching reason why Muslims are a protected species.
I think it is overblown, though it is certainly understandable that you would come to that conclusion, and, of course, it may be that you’re right.
That said, I think there is a simpler explanation. What is protected is not Muslims, but rather the taboo on White majority criticism of or grievance against any minority. In any given White country, it is the most troublesome minority that is the most protected, because that is where a breach in the hull is most likely to occur.
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/000933.html
That the perpetrators and victims in these cases belong to two religions which are intolerant of each other actually does seem to me a significant factor. But of course, there is a reason why the perpetrators are Pakistani and not Albanians or Indonesians. That is because most Pakistanis who emigrated to Britain are largely 1) Of an underclass 2) Low IQ and 3) Extremely inbred. Their customs and taboos also do not forbid sexualizing adolescents. So predictably they engage in horrifying gang activity.
@Holmsen
Thanks for the comment.
Firstly, again, I would maintain that it has nothing to do with religion. It has all to do with race/ethnicity. Bashing Islam will not solve anything. Some pockets may get filled; but there will be no progression towards a solution to stop future tragedies.
Secondly, the reason behind Pakistani involvement and not Albanian or Indonesian one is because the territory on which there is today a State called Pakistan was once under British occupation. The colonial administrators created a massive class of non-White anglophone intermediaries to smoothly run their imperial acquisition. After 1947, some of these non-White intermediaries and their descendants left with their former masters while some strategically placed themselves in various sectors of the Pakistani bureaucratic power grid to keep the erstwhile arrangement intact albeit under a different garb.
This anglophone Pakistani clique would manufacture immigrants from various strata of the society to then export them to serve the “multicultural/multiracial” dreams of the corrupt British or more broadly the Anglophone political class; which is why the number immigrants of South Asian ethnicities living in Canada, Australia, the United States of America, and New Zealand, etc. is so high.
The trafficking has been going on for more than 70 years now. It keeps anti-elitist/ nativist sentiment in both places [Pakistan and the Western nations mentioned here] off balance and in the interest of globalism. Most people in the Occident have NO idea how organised it is.
[There is such a clique, obviously in a much bigger size, that also exists in India but it is not relevant to discuss it here.]
Thirdly, thus, “Tommy Robinson” plays the role of Knights Templar who is then opposed by some minority “Community leader” who is himself well adjusted within the system and thinks the solution lies in more “multiculturalism/multi-racialism”.
The one spoils the White cause whereas the other “community leader” deceives his people both home and abroad.
Lastly, the cause to preserve peoples of White stock stands on solid moral ground. And it is because of my faith that I hold this view.
That is a good point about organized trafficking resulting in colonial backwash, but it only explains why there are so many Pakistanis in Britain, which is another part of the phenomenon but does not conflict with the points I raised.
I believe Islam is chiefly a factor here not because of anything written in the Quran but because religion heightens the in-group/out-group distinction of an already tribal and (within our soft liberal anti white system) criminally disposed race of people. Over half of Pakis in the UK marry their first cousin. These people are bred for ethnic crime gangs.
@Holmsen
I believe Islam is chiefly a factor here not because of anything written in the Quran but because religion heightens the in-group/out-group distinction of an already tribal and…
I don’t agree with your position but, still, it is understandable.
These disgusting men are like dirty containers in which even the cleanest of water gets soiled and contaminated.
That often people fail to perceive this is unfortunate but understandable.
“I would maintain that it has nothing to do with religion. It has all to do with race/ethnicity. Bashing Islam will not solve anything.”
This is an intriguing concept. I read lots of comments but can’t see them all.
Politicians and media personnel attack “Islam” or “Muslims” (that is, the few among them who object to negative immigrant behavior do, though sometimes Jews and the Establishment Left like Charlie Hebdo in France do as well) instead of specific racial, ethnic, or national groups.
No one would ever attack Judaism this way, but criticism of Islam and Muslims is at least permissible, and of course it’s always open season on “Christians.”
Followers of Judaism are a comparatively compact, tightly-knit ethnic entity, whereas Muslims and Christians are racially heterogeneous by comparison, though the latter designators often function as racist code words. “Christian,” for example, is virtually always intended as a code word for whites.
What is your specific position?
That none of the bad guys are religious or have connections with or support from the religious community?
And, if everything has to do with race/ethnicity, how would you break that out or explain it? What races or ethnic groups do you have in mind, and how do their respective social behaviors and racial hatred, violence, and exploitation of white natives differ from one another?
Finally, if it’s not too personal (ignore the query if it is), what does the “Aryan” refer to in your username? Are you Iranian/Persian or Asian Indian? A white convert?
Thanks for the comment, Mr. Hamilton.
What is your specific position?
That none of the bad guys are religious or have connections with or support from the religious community?
My position is this: Characters like “Tommy Robinson” and publications like the one mentioned in this article try to establish that it was because of Islam that these hyenas were hunting those girls, and that somehow they had doctrinal support behind their despicable acts.
This is just downright nonsensical.
Even if some of the perpetrators prayed regularly and displayed their religiosity by dressing up in typical attire, they were, as I mentioned in my last comment, filthy containers of clean water. Their foul and wicked personalities defiled the faith and made it appear soiled and revolting.
And, if everything has to do with race/ethnicity, how would you break that out or explain it? What races or ethnic groups do you have in mind, and how do their respective social behaviors and racial hatred, violence, and exploitation of white natives differ from one another?
I have tackled this point in one of my comments above.
However, to be more specific, ancestrally, the overwhelming majority of Pakistani and Indian immigrants belong to the territories known as Punjab [the northern region] and Kashmir. They are all called “Punjabis” but the tribal makeup within this vast piece of land is very complicated. One has to be fluent in the language and its local dialects to accurately detect exactly where one hails from.
Historically, they have been very close to the British political establishment. Punjabis constituted a huge chunk of the British Indian Army. Even after the departure of the British from India, the ties didn’t sever.
Nevertheless, the generation that opened its eyes in Britain and who speak their mother tongue in British accents seems to be suffering from a severe identity crisis.
And to make matters worse, the social and moral chaos within the Majority and constant political pandering of the immigrant minorities by the gangster Market-State greatly spoiled these men who then indulged in mischief with impunity.
They must have banked on their own ethnic/tribal connections in case things get out of control. Sadly, their victims had no such protective cordon around them.
Finally, if it’s not too personal (ignore the query if it is), what does the “Aryan” refer to in your username? Are you Iranian/Persian or Asian Indian? A white convert?
My paternal ancestors migrated from Nishapur (Iran) to the feet of Shivalik Hills (Northern India) somewhere between 1760 and 1780. They had already converted to Islam by then.
Maternally, given the prevalence of fair skin on that side, it can be said that there, too, a movement took place from West Asia (traditionally, the Greater Khorasan region) to Northern India in the last three or four centuries.
Then came 1947, and a vast majority of them undertook a westward journey to the newly created state of Pakistan. Perhaps, in a hundred years’ time, some of our progeny may return to the spot from where the odyssey began.
The “Aryan” in my username refers to my ethnolinguistic heritage.
Stupid comment. Islam is an alien and utterly false creed (I assure you, Allah does not exist; the concept has been proven to have derived from pre-Islamic Arab mythology) which has given the world very little historically (despite various exaggerations about its alleged civilizational contributions in the Middle Ages), and nothing in modern times. We in the West have no obligation to solve Arab poverty, bring peace to the Middle East, allow Muslims to colonize the West, or, most obnoxious of all, exhaust ourselves attempting to save the souls of these worthless foreigners. Let Arabs and white men live in peace – totally physically separated from one another. We can continue to exchange Western money for Persian Gulf Oil.
But Islam has no place in the West – including in the USA. No true conservative (or Christian!) supports “freedom of religion”, as classical liberal of a shibboleth as ever existed. The 1st Amendment to the US Constitution has been clearly demonstrated to have been intended neither to protect non-Christian religions, nor to disestablish state-level official support for individual Christian sects. Its purpose was to prevent the establishment at the Federal government level of any particular Christian church (as the 13 colonies were already religiously heterogeneous within Christianity).
The only acceptable solution is the total repatriation of every last non-white from Europe back to their ancestral lands. Racially different immigration = foreign invasion (a new form of imperialism, the obviously characteristic one of the postwar era). Those who abet the invasion in any way – political, legal, judicial, media/propaganda – are traitors, and should face treason’s traditional punishments.
Excellent reply, Lord Shang.
Muhammad Aryan: “These South Asian immigrant hyenas targeted White girls because the latter had no tribal and communitarian protection”.
Yes, try the same thing with victims of other ethnicities and a different response ensues. The 2005 Birmingham race riot resulted when rumours spread that a Black girl had been raped by South Asians in Birmingham, England.
In contrast, white British people seemingly do very little.
Mark Gullick: “A surprising aspect of the whole affair is the lack of vigilante retribution.”
Interestingly, googling the name “Gu[l]fraz Khan” and “Telford” did reveal this story, ‘Vandals smash restaurant windows’, from the Shropshire Star in 2008, which reports what appears to be the same person having had windows of the restaurant he co-owns smashed in by a vandal. He is quoted as saying, “I have no idea who would have wanted to do this or why”.
I suppose this was too early to have been retribution for Nicole, but could it have been retribution for an earlier victim?
Britain’s status as a first world country is completely dependent on London’s role as an international financial center, and the only people who will invest the amount of money needed to keep the City afloat at this point are rich Arabs.
This financial angle is indeed a brilliant assessment of why nothing is being done by the government, and even the local officials, to stop this ongoing rape and prostitution of young naive English girls. Thanks for bringing it out into the light.
I’ve visited Rotherham while staying with friends in Sheffield, just a couple miles away. In between the two is a huge mall — Meadowhall — which attracts teens and even pre-teens just as these malls do in the U.S. This is where the initial contact with ‘handsome, dark men with money to spend on lunch and trinkets for these girls” begins. You can take it from there. It’s a monstrous horrid crime, and yet, no one squawks because of the huge amount of money involved. Shame on us — Whites — for allowing this. But at least one is standing up and bringing it to our attention. I hope it’s not ‘too little, too late’.
Rich Arabs couldn’t give a damn about lower class Pakistanis, who are often “employed” in near servitude in the Gulf States (much, it must be said, as they are by richer Pakistanis back home). How much influence money really buys you in London is more questionable than your commentators imagine. There are staggering amounts of Russian money in London, but anti-Russian posturing by the British political class is routine. The British state is a constitutional monarchy in legal theory, a self-proclaimed democracy in its own propaganda but an oligarchy in fact. Oligarchies are complicated, which is by no means entirely a bad thing.
I can speak to the effect on the police and first responders in the USA: their suicide rate has more than doubled since 2010 and the stats are not fully out yet on 2020-21 (which I can only assume will see another spike). And it’s not just that their hands are tied, although that is terribly demoralizing, it’s the bald-faced and unapologetic decline in humanity as a whole. Negresses who have just seen their children die in a house fire film themselves and and ask for followers on Facebook, as in while the damn house is still burning, are the norm. What does she care? They were just a paycheck to get her nails did anyway. She’ll pop out a few more and carry on.
Years ago I remember reading stories where the idea was floated that Prince Charles was considering converting to Islam. As Whites have abandoned Christianity we’ve begun to lose everything our ancestors built. Would the Turks have been turned back at Vienna if the men defending Europe hadn’t had faith in Christianity? You can bet the house that in a strongly Christian country, no girls would be groomed, and no Moslems would be so arrogant.
I tried to view the video on You Tube, but it has been removed ‘by the uploader’ — what does that mean? I’m not at all surprised in this day when everything is supposedly offensive to someone. I am just so pleased that Counter Currents is here to supply us with the written story, which is graphic enough. Thanks for posting the truth.
I understand this crime is occurring all over Europe today, especially in Central and Eastern Europe. Even in the recent book “The Open-Society Playbook”, the subject has an entire chapter that includes the Israelis as participating in the ‘People Trafficking’ trade today, as well as in ancient times. Islamic invasions into Southern Europe and points north have been occurring right along since the 7th Century. It’s a horrendous problem, and a threat to our race as our women are raped and mutilated physically and emotionally, and often are harmed internally where they cannot have children. We really have to get on this problem in order to save the race itself. These aren’t ‘bad women’, but just young, naive girls from poor homes. But many of our ancestors came from poor situations, and their genes flow in our blood. It’s time to do something about this and save these women.
We’ve updated the links to the copy of the video that’s on Bitchute.
Say what you want about Tommy Robinson, he’s a genuine expression of native populist English disgust for what’s being done to his country. His anger for what happened to his home town of Luton is palpable and heartfelt and he would do nothing rather than reverse it. The worst that can be said of him is that he is uneducated and misguided, and therefore likely to be co-opted. He fell in with a Zionist crowd a while back and probably still thinks a racist is the worst thing a person could be. However he also has instincts that always lead him away from going full puppet, and back to the issues that matter, as evidenced by the making of this documentary.
Britain is in a sorry, scary state, under Stalinist-Mohammedan occupation. This is probably the sort of thing that Americans will be subjected to once the 2nd amendment goes out the window: the same things we’re seeing now, but more brazenly anti-white, more baffling and targeted and sadistic. This regime can only be controlled by its fear of the people it unjustly governs. Any light that’s being shone on the injustices of this multicultural madness to stir righteous indignation in the population is a welcome one.
Sometimes it is useful to have a thriving Mohammedan community around. A while ago, I was jaywalking in front of a police car; when I noticed my blunder, the cops were already pumped up like maybugs, ready to deliver a tedious lecture and an expensive ticket. Just then, I realized I was near a mosque – and proceeded to guide my steps resolutely towards the holy site’s portals. Needless to say, the police instantly looked the other way and took off… al-hamdu lillah!
The most disturbing aspect of these grooming gang stories, as Mr. Gullick highlighted, is the lack of vigilantism by the local community. I don’t know if this is a pathological feature of Englishmen and their culture, i.e., the English are so law-abiding that they refuse to take justice into their own hands even when the local police and courts have so blatantly abandoned them. Or if it is representative of how effectively liberal propaganda in the press, the schools and the popular culture has neutered white Englishmen from ever acting in their self-interest against non-whites, particularly Muslims.
The intro to Frodi’s podcast is a speech by, I believe, Jonathan Bowden. In it Bowden said that demographic replacement is not really about absolute numbers; that it doesn’t really matter if whites are 90%, 60% or 30% of the population. What is much more important, he stated, is our state of mind. If you think and behave like a powerless, weak minority, you will be treated like one. Inversely, if you collectively cultivate your self-confidence and become more assertive, the tide of demographic replacement and control of our homelands can be rapidly reversed. It simply requires the will to do so. Obviously this will and cultural confidence was completely extinguished in the communities that passively allowed Muslims to rape their girls.
In my opinion, this process of making our people more self-assertive has little to do with how religious we are, as some commenters have suggested. The dwindling numbers of Christians in England or the West isn’t the cause of our diffidence. It began long before the pews started emptying. And rediscovering religion will have little impact on our trajectory, if we don’t regain our racial and cultural confidence. Religion alone will not accomplish that, particularly the universalist doctrine that Christianity preaches.
Great article Mr Gullick and excellent work by Tommy Robinson in exposing the evil of these Asian grooming gangs and equally evil police officers covering up their crimes. There are several take away messages:
1. Support truth tellers and citizen journalists.
2. Start collectivising as a people- we must look out for each other’s wellbeing. The individualist idea that if something bad occurs, you call up your local police force and justice will be served is reckless naivety.
3. Never allow your daughter or son to work for or take taxi rides from non whites. Of course we know not every non white would behave like these filthy perverts but the risk is there nonetheless.
4.Main stream media and government officials in the UK are involved in the cover up. It’s not just a corrupt police force. Otherwise why are there so few convictions? Limited coverage in the media? No sacking of corrupt and useless police officers? Continuous immigration from regions who supply the rapists?
5. The fear of being called racist is a major taboo so much so the daughters of England are being defiled to avoid being called the magic word.
I fully agree with Marks insight into the style of the Tommy’s video production in comparison to mainstream media. I detest the ‘News’ with the music, special clothes/ suits, insincere ways of speaking and juxtaposition of trivial news stories alongside serious content the latter of which is always designed to manipulate in some way. As an Irishman, I look in horror at what is happening in England because I know that is likely to occur in my own country too in the not too distant future because as everyone knows we are now a very ‘progressive’ country.
The feminists who regularly decry ‘rape culture’ on campus and in the workplace are strangely silent on the topic of the UK’s predominantly Pakistani grooming gangs.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment