Counter-Currents
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 322 Ask Me Anything with Greg Johnson
Counter-Currents RadioTo listen in a player, click here. To download the mp3, right-click here and choose “save link as” or “save target as.”
On this episode of Counter-Currents Radio, Greg Johnson answers listener questions submitted through DLive and Entropy.
- 0:00:00 The Nick Fuentes vs. Patrick Casey controversy
- 0:08:30 Patrick Le Brun
- 0:10:30 Reply to James Lawrence
- 0:18:30 Moldbug’s idea of “formalization”
- 0:21:45 Favorite teachers
- 0:25:00 The “Bitcoin fairy”
- 0:30:00 Trump’s acquittal
- 0:38:00 “Under Cover with the Alt Right“
- 0:45:20 Horror films, vampire films, Trevor Lynch on the Twilight Saga
- 0:48:45 The intro and outro music
- 0:51:00 Who gets to vote in the ethnostate?
- 0:54:00 Interviews with journalists
If you want to support Counter-Currents, please send us a donation by going to our Entropy page and selecting “send paid chat.” Entropy allows you to donate any amount from $3 and up. All comments will be read and discussed in the next episode of Counter-Currents Radio, which airs every weekend on DLive.
Don’t forget to sign up for the twice-monthly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
Related
-
How to Divide White People
-
Proč nepodporuji Tommyho Robinsona
-
Christmas Special: Merry Christmas, Infidels!
-
Using Politics to Segregate the Sexes
-
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 561: An All-Star Thanksgiving Weekend Special
-
We Have Much to be Thankful For
-
Black Friday Special: It’s Time to STOP Shopping for Christmas
-
Nueva Derecha vs. Vieja Derecha, Capítulo 12: La Cuestión Cristiana en el Nacionalismo Blanco
4 comments
On the one hand, Greg criticizes people in our movement who opt out of politics (or who refused to vote for Trump or other lesser-of-two-evils Republicans) as playing a losing game. On the other hand, he praises disaffected white voters in Georgia who, he claims, punished the GOP and gave the two Senate seats to DEMs, saying that such “mad-men Trump voters” who forgo their short-term interests and scare the GOP wield real power.
Is this inconsistent?
No, it isn’t inconsistent.
Not voting at all is dumb. Voting as a bloc to punish establishment sellouts is exercising political power.
Trump voters are an actual political bloc, and the GOP establishment now fears and caters to them. This is how things move in the right direction.
Guess who has zero credibility with this huge bloc of voters? Biden voters. People who dismissed claims of election fraud. People who branded Stop the Steal as a grift. People who cheer on the persecution of the Capitol protesters.
Wignats who claim they are the “5%” who prevented Trump’s reelection are not a voting bloc. They are frauds. They are engaged in the same fraud as the wignats who claimed they “memed Trump into the White House” in 2016.
That’s interesting about the Bitcoin theory. Basically I understand the speaker as saying in so many words that it is correct, but it was more the stick, ie the having their domain seized, than the carrot of the Bitcoin bribe that influenced them. Why did they seize daily stormer’s domain in response to Charlottesville? They were not directly involved in organizing it were they, at least not in a major way? Also what does it mean to seize someone’s domain? Could they do this to anyone, even Unz? Even if you have your own server? Why wouldn’t they just get their own server? It’s a fascinating subject.
No, you have misunderstood. I reject as a baseless slander that the donation was a “bribe” to begin with.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.