1,887 words
Earlier this month a 19-year-old former DOGE staffer named Edward Coristine, otherwise known as “Big Balls,” thwarted a carjacking in Washington, DC. He was with his girlfriend when ten black teenaged thugs approached and threatened to steal his car. He pushed his girlfriend into the car to protect her and then faced the mob alone. They beat him within an inch of his life. Soon this got the attention of President Trump who promised to clean up Washington, DC. As with much of Trump 2.0, promises were made and promises were kept. Trump’s main actions included deploying 800 National Guard troops to the city, demolishing homeless encampments, and appointing the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration as the de facto chief of police. This action falls under section 740 of the DC Home Rule Act and marks the first time a president has placed DC under federal control—although there has been pushback. The White House stated that the takeover will be in effect for 30 days.
With typical bluster and overstatement, Trump announced his plans thusly:
Crime in Washington, D.C., is totally out of control. Local “youths” and gang members, some only 14, 15, and 16-years-old, are randomly attacking, mugging, maiming, and shooting innocent Citizens, at the same time knowing that they will be almost immediately released.
They are not afraid of Law Enforcement because they know nothing ever happens to them, but it’s going to happen now! The Law in D.C. must be changed to prosecute these “minors” as adults, and lock them up for a long time, starting at age 14.
The most recent victim was beaten mercilessly by local thugs. Washington, D.C., must be safe, clean, and beautiful for all Americans and, importantly, for the World to see. If D.C. doesn’t get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City, and run this City how it should be run, and put criminals on notice that they’re not going to get away with it anymore.
Perhaps it should have been done a long time ago, then this incredible young man, and so many others, would not have had to go through the horrors of Violent Crime. If this continues, I am going to exert my powers, and FEDERALIZE this City. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Obviously there’s nothing to disagree with here. Crime in DC is out of control, and, since crime is bad, controlling it must be a good thing. No elected official in the country could survive office by saying anything else. At least officially. Unofficially, however, Trump’s enemies on the Left desperately need to find something here to disagree with. If they don’t, they will cede a political victory to the Orange Man, who, as we all know, is also bad—perhaps even worse than out-of-control crime.
While Trump has shown canny political instincts during his second term—and has fought the Left quite fearlessly—his inexact and sometimes careless phrasing often leaves openings through which his enemies can pounce. These may be tiny openings, but that’s all one needs to take some of the wind of out a president’s rhetorical sails. For example, when Trump made headlines a few months ago for criticizing the black South African government for oppressing its white population, he showed footage of the South African president’s motorcade driving past countless white crosses on both sides of the road. Each of these crosses, of course, represented a Boer farmer who had been murdered by blacks. Yet Trump carelessly referred to them as actual gravesites. This was all that reporters needed to prove Trump wrong and convert what should have been a homerun into a standup triple. Yes, it’s a picayune objection made by small-minded, dishonest operatives, but that doesn’t matter in today’s politics when most people see two sides squabbling and cannot be bothered to figure out which one is correct.
Well, it’s happened again. On August 11, Trump held a press conference where he tried to solidify his case for federalizing DC, and unfortunately gave leftists all they needed to punch back. According to PBS:
President Donald Trump said Washington, D.C.’s homicide rate is higher than “the worst places on Earth.”
At an Aug. 11 press conference announcing a federal government takeover of the district’s Metropolitan Police Department and the deployment of National Guard troops to the nation’s capital, Trump displayed several charts comparing D.C.’s homicide rate with cities around the world.
“The murder rate in Washington today is higher than that of Bogotá, Colombia, Mexico City, some of the places that you hear about as being the worst places on Earth,” Trump said.
“We have DC: 41 per 100,000. No.1 that we can find anywhere in the world,” Trump said, holding up a chart comparing homicide rates across capital cities. “Other cities are pretty bad, but they’re not as bad as that.”
The chart Trump displayed was first shared Aug. 6 on Fox News’ “The Will Cain Show.” Trump didn’t mention that the data in it is from 2023. Since then, the district’s homicide rate has fallen considerably. The rate was not the worst in the world — then or now.
In 2023, at least 49 other cities in the world had higher homicide rates.
The articles goes on to point out that the 2023 DC murder rate was actually 39.4 per 100,000, that it dropped to 27.3 in 2024, and that DC has inflated statistics anyway since it does not have safer suburbs in its jurisdiction like most other cities do. Thus, it pronounced Trump’s claim false. The implication here is clear—Donald Trump is exaggerating DC crime statistics as an excuse to take over the city.
Of course, such a point is beside the main point. Trump could very well have been inaccurate with his statistics, and the federal takeover of DC would still be justified. 27.3 murder victims per 100,000 people still makes the nation’s capital a highly dangerous place. It doesn’t matter if the rate dropped since 2024; it’s still too high. People who live and work in DC know this well. There’s also evidence that cities underreport their crime statistics so not to tarnish their own images. And with a chief of police this dumb it makes sense that DC murderers are getting away with…well…murder. Furthermore, we can fact check the fact checkers and reveal that in 2019, DC’s murder rate was 23.52 per 100,000. So if we zoom out far enough murder has actually increased in Washington, DC. This is something you’re not going to hear about from PBS.
Another thing to remember is that DC’s 2023 murder rate of 39.4 or 41 or whatever it was is still insanely high for a civilized country. Just the fact that it spiked so high as recently as two years ago tells us everything we need to know about how dangerous the city really is. For sake of comparison, 39 murder deaths per 100,000 is just south of countries such as Jamaica (49.3 in 2023), Ecuador (45.7 in 2023), South Africa (45.5 in 2022), Haiti (41.5 in 2023), and Trinidad and Tobago (39.5 in 2022)—a real pantheon of murder right there. Yes, we’re comparing a city of 700,000 to countries with millions. And yes, 39 isn’t close to the number one spot, which is occupied by Colima, Mexico (181.9 in 2023 or 2024). Still, however, being only the 50th most dangerous city in the world in 2023 is hardly a reason to keep Donald Trump from reducing crime in the nation’s capital.
But you know what is? Black ethnocentrism. Because that is what this is all about. As I have said before, blacks have a higher tolerance for crime, basically for two reasons. One, when compared to most non-blacks, they are genetically inclined to commit crimes due to their low average IQ and general poor impulse control. This comes as a result of thousands of years of cross-breeding with archaic, chimp-like hominid sub-species which pre-date the origin of Neanderthals. This was discovered a few years ago after geneticists investigated the source of what’s known as Sub-Saharan African “Ghost DNA,” which no other people on the planet possess. So for blacks to crack down harshly on crime would be to crack down harshly on themselves.
Secondly, urban crime is necessary for American blacks to maintain continuity as a population and identity group. High rates of crime keep non-blacks out of black-run municipalities and allows blacks not only ecological living space, but also a level of prestige on the national stage—since black run areas will always elect black representatives. If American blacks actually were to crack down on crime in the cities they dominate, non-whites would move back to these places, causing black majorities to evaporate. Thus the black elites would be benefiting a relatively small number of individual blacks at the expense of their population as a whole.
Blacks being soft on crime is actually smart from an evolutionary standpoint. As an ethnocentrist myself, I don’t exactly blame them. Of course, blacks are at best a burden and at worst a threat to civilization, and hence do not belong in one. Whites in America and Europe are going to find this out eventually, and hopefully will do something about it before Western civilization utterly vanishes, but it makes little sense to blame blacks for behaving irrationally in their own perceived self-interest.
But you know who we can blame? The white liberal. These people tend to be just as intolerant of crime as the right, but are willing to overlook it as long as it does not occur in their neighborhoods. This is largely due to the inherent immorality of leftists as well as to the stubborn black loyalty to the Democrat Party. Leftists tolerate black crime for political reasons due to their opposition to (some would say hatred of) the right. In their minds, the white right is a greater threat to civilization than blacks committing wanton murder in the streets because Hitler. This is where we find the nefarious influence of Jews, who never tire of demonizing their enemies for bad behavior in the past while tacitly ignoring their own, which was worse. And because Jews are so talented and energetic when it comes to media, education, and academia, they have managed to brainwash a significant proportion of whites to see the world as they do. (Yes, it is more complicated than this in reality, but this is the gist of it.) Hence the white elite threw the book at white police officer Derek Chauvin, who in 2020 did not murder the black fentanyl-addled, career criminal George Floyd beyond a reasonable doubt, yet went easy on Somali-born, black police officer Mohammed Noor who 2017 did murder the perfectly innocent white Justine Damond beyond a reasonable doubt. Chauvin is currently serving 22.5 years in prison, while Noor was sentenced to 12.5 and was released after 4.75.
There are countless examples of such anti-white, two-tiered justice. Recently in England, white Patriotic Alternative activist Sam Melia was sentenced to two years in prison for sharing anti-immigration memes and stickers, while black Labour councilor Ricky Jones served no time at all for calling for this followers to slit the throats of people protesting against an act of murder committed by a black youth.
This is why white leftists focus on proving Trump wrong on trivialities, while ignoring the necessity of reducing crime. The fact that the left is willing to tolerate crime for misguided political reasons is frankly intolerable. Thankfully, we have a president right now who has balls big enough to do something about it.
44 comments
If white peoples around the globe have yet to figure out that blacks are at the very least a burden to civilization, then they never will.
We were pretty well aware at one time, until a massive propaganda campaign fooled half the population and intimidated the other half into silence about it.
Couldn’t agree more. It’s mostly white people who know damn well the truth, but just refuse to admit it.
AmRen are great refusers when it comes to admitting reality.
No matter what happens, Taylor keeps pretending it’s 1995 over there. It’s embarrassing.
I never got this impression from AmRen readers.
Their blind spot is the JQ.
In what way?
That statement couldn’t be any further from the truth.
Jared is not ignorant of the JQ. He just doesn’t think mentioning it is as imperative for white advocacy as you seem to think it is.
It’s a question of strategy, not ignorance; his approach has a place and should be respected.
That makes me think of a book from 1907:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Negro:_A_Menace_to_American_Civilization
I’m sure you can’t get a copy of that anymore. It should be required reading
There’s a listing for it on Walmart .com:
https://www.walmart.com/ip/The-Negro-a-Menace-to-American-Civilization-Hardcover/16892664156
There’s a pdf on Archive.org. There are a bunch of blank pages you have to scroll past because they scanned the entire book, but it’s there:
https://ia801302.us.archive.org/18/items/negroamenacetoa00shufgoog/negroamenacetoa00shufgoog.pdf
Thank you, Eva. I reviewed a similar book published in 1904, The Negro: The Southerner’s Problem.
Trump should take some type of action against our so-called ally Great Brittan because of these double standards whites in that country have to put up with when it comes to black and Muslim crime. He could at least raise the issue with Brittan’s political establishment, just like he did with the South African president over the white farm murders. Also, another example of crime and disfunction in a black run city is the mayor of New Orleans who is being indicted. That would make a good C-C article.
Good article, SJQ!
Premise for a story: One morning the world awakes to find that every black man, woman, and child has inexplicably vanished.
There are mixed reactions, predictably, but there is also finally more freedom to candidly discuss what blacks were really like, (though many whites, also predictably and because of their programming, persist in praising them.)
The major question becomes: Should we be thankful for “The Gift” and just start living vastly improved lives, or rather try to bring them back, as the international de facto religion implies should happen? There are, after all, in sperm and eggs banks, still the reserves to make that possible.
Inimical anti-white groups (including white liberals themselves) weigh the costs of reanimating the world’s most precarious bio-weapon.
“The Gift” should be worshipped as an almighty god bestowing fortune, and White traitors and other dreg propagators who even consider reintroducing “The Problem” out of some putrid misguided ‘anti-racist’ belief should be dealt with in a most excruciatingly terrifying fashion to purge such silly thoughts from their heads ever again.
Great article as always Mr Quinn.
(Casual reader editorial catch: “If American blacks actually were to crack down on crime in the cities they dominate, non-whites would move back to these places, causing black majorities to evaporate.”) Everyone knows what was meant here but it did cause me to double take the sentence.
Does anyone know about DC’s subway? I’ve read that it’s actually a good one, not just a useless gewgaw for tourists. Is there significant crime on it? I love the interview below where the well-known military theorist Lind expresses his love for trains but not buses, because you-know-who rides buses.
https://grist.org/article/2010-10-21-william-lind-makes-the-conservative-case-for-public-transit-but/
I visited DC last year (out of necessity, not by choice) and rode the subway daily. While certainly not the hell-hole the NY subway is, riding it in DC was not nearly as pleasant as it used to be in the 1990s when I lived in that area. During my visit last year I saw plenty of blacks acting up to some extent or other while inside the subway cars. The “never relax” rule was definitely in effect for me. But what really stuck out was that I routinely witnessed people jumping the turnstiles at certain stations – something I had never, ever seen in the DC subway in previous years. Every single time it was a black person who jumped the turnstile, and every single time the employees at the station who could see what was going on didn’t say boo about it. Some “broken windows” policing could nip this in the bud, but don’t expect that to happen.
So while people in the DC subway aren’t getting shoved in front of approaching trains or set on fire while sleeping (yet!), conditions are noticeably deteriorating.
I disagree that nitpicking the shit Trump says (and he indeed talks a lot of shit) somehow turns his political homeruns into triples or doubles. The truth is that the fact checks are almost always worse than Trump’s bluster. “DC is the most dangerous city in the world!” Well, actually we looked into it and it’s the 49th most dangerous city. The correction here just makes the writer look like a disingenuous, not to mention incredibly stupid, partisan hack. It also forces the writer to acknowledge the general truth of what Trump is saying. Trump does this so effectively, so effortlessly, and so frequently that I can’t tell if he’s doing it on purpose, or if God himself has intervened in world affairs to bless this man with the most ridiculous and retarded enemies possible.
I wonder if Trump is using an old trick from the Richard Nixon playbook. Nixon was known to exaggerate certain things to provoke a reaction from his critics, thereby giving more mileage to his story. For example: ‘the White House stated that 94% of actuaries favor this pension reform’. The media fact checks it and comes back with ‘not true, only 91% support it’. The story gets extra exposure this way.
A hard hitting piece. No one has brought up, so far as I’m aware, the conspiracy angle in any of this. Given BBs political prominence, and his role in cutting back federal jobs, which predominantly go to a certain kind of person let’s face it, has anyone considered the possibility that this could’ve been some sort of targeted crime? That it wasn’t mere chance?
actually I lived in DC a few months in the early 2000s, and although it shares many characteristics with cities like Detroit to New Orleans, actually the crime is quite segregated. There is relatively a little black on white crime actually in DC. This is the sort of thing that makes the mark Rich murder so suspicious, and there was a lot of discussion along these lines back at that time.. Yes he had political enemies, but there’s also a high probability it could’ve been random in a place such as that. From what I’ve observed the usual suspects are very effective at weaponizing black crime when they want to. I’ve observed this suspected it before, but I’m not sure of the mechanism.
From what I’ve observed the usual suspects are very effective at weaponizing black crime…
I think it is a weapon that they gained from sacrificing babies to Moloch for thousands of years. Wasn’t it Martin Luther who said that rabbis were the descendants of sorcerers? 🙃
Actually, Moloch was a Canaanite God of fertility or something like that, a polytheistic Gentile God.
Baal is often used to mean Lord God; therefore some say that this became Yahweh when monotheism became the norm and Abraham snipped off his foreskin, but that is doubtful.
I think the story is that Jews are endlessly worried about the Israelites being seduced by Gentile Gods.
The important point, however, is that Holocaust mythology has a VERY LONG pedigree for Jews.
Both the late Nobel laureate Eliezer Wiesel and the Polish-born French Jewish artist David Olère made claims that the Stormtroopers tossed babies and others alive directly into bonfires at Auschwitz, which is fabulism at its finest.
IMAGE1
The actor James Woods played an Olère-like character in the 1978 NBC TV miniseries Holocaust. He is building roads for the Germans during the war and bearing witness to Auschwitz afterwards with his dodgy and semi-perverted art.
The Moloch diety is often depicted in popular culture as a kind of gas-oven meatgrinder or “murder mill.” This is where we get the gaping mouth of Crematoria 2 and the flaming chimneys and so forth from (LINK).
IMAGE2
IMAGE3
🙂
“Blacks have a higher tolerance for crime, basically for two reasons. One, when compared to most non-blacks, they are genetically inclined to commit crimes due to their low average IQ and general poor impulse control.” The poor impulse control is related to higher psychopathic personality traits, so the two reasons are better described as lower average IQ (roughly between 80 and 85) and higher average levels of psychopathic personality traits (Lynn, 2002).
Lynn, R. (2002). Racial and ethnic differences in psychopathic personality. Personality and Individual Differences 32 (2002) 273–316. Abstract: This paper proposes that there are racial and ethnic differences in psychopathic personality conceptualised as a continuously distributed trait, such that high values of the trait are present in blacks and Native Americans, intermediate values in Hispanics, lower values in whites and the lowest values in East Asians. Part one sets out the evidence for this thesis. Part two applies the thesis to the unresolved problem in The Bell Curve that racial and ethnic differences in several social phenomena such as crime, welfare dependency, rates of marriage, etc. cannot be fully explained by differences in IQ and proposes that some of the residual disparities are attributable to differences in psychopathic personality. Part three integrates the theory with Rushton’s r-K theory of race differences.
And here’s AI (sighting Psychology Today) concerning psychopathic traits: Psychopathic traits include superficial charm, manipulativeness, lack of empathy, and a grandiose sense of self-worth, often accompanied by impulsivity and a tendency towards antisocial behavior. These traits can manifest in various ways, including deceitfulness, a lack of remorse or guilt, and a parasitic lifestyle. Psychology Today says psychopathy is a serious condition with public health implications, including a heightened risk for aggression and violence.
Thank you for this. Will use this terminology from now on.
You’re welcome.
The thought has occurred to me that we outsource so much in the U.S., that perhaps we should outsource our big cities’ criminal law enforcement and courts to the Singaporeans. Their approach – flogging for lesser crimes, hanging for more serious ones – would be just the ticket for DC, New York, Los Angeles, etc/
Get some more Samoans in here. They are like the world’s tallest, stockiest people, and they don’t identify as black. The 1980s joke-rock group Angry Samoans named themselves that because they noticed that in LA all the bouncers at clubs were Samoan, and they were naturals at controlling crowds. That wrestler The Rock is Samoan, and he seems genial and friendly and not crazyviolentblackhatewhitey.
👎 👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎
So your solution is to bring more non-whites here? 🙃
No, I was riffing on the jokey ironic tone of the original commenter. But that failed. I failed at humor, you failed at seeing my delicate irony. Let’s call it a draw.
😄
We could outsource the prison system to the Russians. I bet the convicts would love it there!
I’ve been to Singapore. It’s the cleanest, safest big city I’ve ever visited, and I have traveled on five continents. The whole time I was walking around there, I kept thinking, “This is what American cities could be like, if only…if only…”
How would they deal with the negro problems of color? Hopefully not pampering with kid gloves but psychotic cruelty and brutality? What the hell has happened to us as Whites?
@ JaymunD
…high values of the trait are present in blacks and Native Americans, intermediate values in Hispanics,…
Thank you! I am surprised about the Native Americans, but then, I don’t live near a reservation. I think that Hispanics are on par with blacks. 🙃
I’m not an expert but I’ve noticed extremely high crime rates near Reservations.
🙂
I think that Hispanics are on par with blacks.
I would say it depends on which group of Hispanics. With Argentinians, Uruguayans, or other White Hispanics, it doesn’t seem so at all. On the other hand with people from the Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, or other Afro-Hispanic places, I would agree. At best, some people have seen Mexico through a romantic lens, but even Beat poet Gregory Corso was grossed out by Mexico’s squalor and backwardness.
The squalor of Mexico. I read a good biography of Hart Crane but was puzzled by his love of Mexico. He claimed to have a handsome young Mexican boyfriend, but there was no pic of the boyfriend. Instead, the book had a plate showing some typical Mexicans hanging around the house where Crane lived in the late 1920s, looking like stupid, lazy, gawky peasants, not the least bit handsome.
I just browsed a Wikipedia LIST of the 50 cities with the highest per capita homicide rates ─ and Mexico is the worst with 17 cities on the list, and it has six of them in the top ten, including Tijuana at No. 7.
The USA has 7 cities on the top 50 list for about the same year (2022).
The top U.S. murder cities rank in with:
No. 28 New Orleans, LA
No. 30 Memphis, TN
No. 44 San Juan (Puerto Rico)
No. 46 Baltimore, MD
No. 50 Detroit, MI
In the United States, it looks like a certain African demographic is prominent in homicides, including the PR territory, which is highly Africanized.
Interestingly ─ Tijuana, Mexico has about 88 homicides per 100 K, while neighboring San Diego, California only about 5.
Ciudad Juárez, down Mexico way, has a whopping 66 per 100 K, while just Norte in the Gringo heartland, El Paso only has about 4. Maybe that is why the Hispanics voted Trump.
Houston, we see a pattern here.
Btw, Houston, TX at 20 per 100 K is edged out by Albuquerque, NM at 21 and Akron, OH at 22. I don’t know how many Mestizos are in Akron, but from the last time that I visited just after Covid, I don’t recall noticing a lot of Blacks in Albuquerque (now about 3 percent, with Hispanics as the majority or close to it). There were certainly no Blacks in Albuquerque in 1968 when I was going to school there.
Las Vegas has an impressive 24 homicides per 100 K ─ and as far as the demographics, Whites are now a minority at about 40 percent, with Asians at 7 percent and “mixed race” at 5 percent. There are many, many, many more Blacks afoot in Las Vegas now than I like to see at about 12 percent. For the Beaner invasion (Hispanic or Latino of any race) there is about 33 percent. Las Vegas is not the town that I remember in 1966 when I started school there. There was maybe one Black kid and two Mexicans in the whole Paradise school.
By comparison, Phoenix proper and Los Angeles have 12 and 10 homicides per 100 K, respectively. And Denver and Salt Lake City have 14 and 8.
Mesa, Arizona, a borough in the five-million-strong Phoenix metropolitan area with its own population of 500 thousand ─ about a third of the size of Phoenix itself having 1.6 million ─ still has a homicide rate of 5 per 100 K.
Hopefully, both Arizona cities have learned their lessons about previously hiring Black and Hispanic police chiefs, like the notorious George Gascón, the Havana-born former Mesa Chief of Police and the recent Los Angeles District Attorney.
🙂
I would use the racial term “mestizos.” “Hispanic” is a term popularized by the US census department to divide whites. It would make the white, or mostly white, descendants of conquerors, conquistadors, ludicrously think they, in North America, are victims of racism and exploitation by those evil Anglos. “Hispanic” is not a racial term, because it has an infamous asterisked footnote accompanying it, saying “Hispanics may be of any race.”
7 primary colors. 7 days of the week. 7 oceans (including north and souths). 7 problem populations, each with one ‘odd man out.’ Indigo, the sabbath, the Antarctic, and White traitors within a 7-problem cluster of blacks, muslims, jews, chinese, indians, beaner-mestizos.
Great article. I would say that Trump’s “Fake News” cliche hits home repeatedly because the usual suspects in the lame-stream media just can’t help themselves.
It is pretty obvious that they bend over backwards trying to debunk some useless and probably distorted factoid in order to own Trump, and it usually backfires.
Trump’s fervent base probably do not care about such trivia ─ and the media elites fermenting in their own Liberal crock pots, might understand how badly the people hate them, if they were not so smitten with their own poop.
🙂
They don’t care how much people despise them and probably get off on it, knowing amerikans won’t do shit minus the occasional Luigi Mangione. Your guns are allowed for every purpose except the ones they’re intended for, and zog knows full well armed Whites are narcotized with deranged luv for cops and soldiers who protect the anti-White state.
I’ve been on the business end of United Healthcare as an accident victim and I’m not in any case a big admirer of dumb anarchists like Luigi Mangione, whom I call the Uni-brow-mer.
IMAGE1
In any case, the 2nd Amendment does what it was intended to do, which is to allow citizens to privately own common infantry arms for 1) self defense, and 2) as a deterrent, and 3) to allow the ability of citizens to form a militia in preparation for times of “unrest” by mustering your neighbors to drill with their own weapons. Goose-stepping is optional.
🙂
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.