Counter-Currents
858 words
“We don’t take kindly to joggers around these here parts.” (Cue dueling banjos)
Let’s get right to it. I’m a blue-collar southerner. Greg and Travis McMichael could literally be my brothers or cousins. They could very well be my coworkers or next-door neighbors. These are the kind of men I’d feel comfortable sitting next to on a barstool, drinking a beer, talking about the things us southern folks talk about when we sit at a bar and have a beer. I believe, with all my heart, that these two men were morally faultless on February 23rd when they shot, in self-defense, prolific jogger and aspiring architect, Ahmaud Arbery.
Okay, I’ll move the goal post a bit and offer a caveat. In non-Clown World, the McMichael boys would have been morally faultless; but alas, as Counter-Currents readers are well aware, our current reality mires us chest-deep in Clown World, and we get closer to drowning in Piss Earth waste each and every passing day.
Here’s a recap of what transpired. Allegedly, a recent string of thefts had plagued the McMichaels’ neighborhood. Among other things, tools and supplies had been stolen from a new home construction site. Even though the 100-meter dash is the only race that mattered to the McMichaels, they obviously held a bias against joggers (particularly the ones who wear khakis and Timberlands) and suspected Arbery of doing what joggers are known to do (i.e. walking through non-jogger neighborhoods and trespassing on private property).
So, as it happens, on that fateful February day when the McMichaels spotted our hapless architect-jogger inspecting the structural integrity of the attic joists in their neighbor’s new home, their bias against slower-paced athletes kicked in and they called the police, grabbed their firearms, and proceeded to perform their civic duty and initiate a “citizens arrest” while the cops were en route. They pursued the jogger (who by this point had undoubtedly decided to become a sprinter) in their pickup truck. The inevitable confrontation ended in bloodshed when our architect-to-be reached for McMichael’s shotgun (confusing it for a T square or a compass, no doubt) and shots were fired.
I think that pretty much sums it up, give or take a minor detail or two. As I said, I take the non-Clown World position that property rights should be respected. I believe that it is our civic duty to watch out for our neighbors’ property as well. And this may be a bit old school, but joggers should know better than to loiter around in non-jogger neighborhoods where they have no business being.
But we don’t live in non-Clown World, do we? And until that fact changes, it is in our collective non-jogger best interest that we accept certain realities, and one of those realities is that chasing joggers down in pick-up trucks while brandishing loaded weapons is never going to end well. Like I said earlier, the McMichael clan appear to be fellas that I could hang with. I’m not going to pick the low-hanging fruit about their physiognomy, their weight, or their good-ole-boy appearance. But self-awareness is a good thing, and they should have known that their guilt was already predetermined by our honking, red-nosed overlords simply for being Southern (and probably evangelical Christian) non-joggers. Even half-Hispanic George Zimmerman wasn’t immune, remember that?
There’s a saying in our circles that goes something like: “Around joggers, never relax.” I’d like to contend in my commentary that this does not only mean to be suspicious of joggers when they stop to admire your landscaping or your triple crown molding. It also means to modify your own behavior as to protect yourself from Clown World consequences. Chasing joggers in pickup trucks? While armed with loaded weapons? Even non-joggers with badges often find themselves up against a wall when things get messy. Don’t do it. Just don’t.
Like I said earlier, joggers should know to stick to their own neighborhoods. I mean, how many Starbucks-drinking, Star Wars tee-shirt-wearing, bearded, bugman non-joggers do you see venturing into jogger neighborhoods? They all know better. Even those of us who are appalled at paying $10 for a cup of coffee know that we aren’t welcome in certain areas. At the same time, we are also well aware that our death at the hands of Timberland-sporting cross-country athletes would not be a blip on anyone’s radar.
It’s a shame that America has come to this. But think before you act. This is a case of optics, and it has nothing to do with looking a certain way. It does have everything to do with making inadvisable choices. If we want to ultimately win this war, we need to know which battles to pick, and this wasn’t a battle that had any chance of being won.
Good luck out there. It’s going to get worse before it gets better.
If you want to support our work, please send us a donation by going to our Entropy page and selecting “send paid chat.” Entropy allows you to donate any amount from $3 and up. All comments will be read and discussed in the next episode of Counter-Currents Radio, which airs every Friday.
26 comments
It’s a shame for them, but this case has the potential to redpill more people than the Trayvon Martin business, considering how it is being deconstructed and mocked in real time.
Long term, it will be beneficial for white America, though at the expense of the lives and reputation of two upstanding white men.
Your penultimate paragraph gets to the heart of it. Whites have been essentially forced out of entire neighborhoods, in cities we built, for decades because being a white person in a “diverse” neighborhood, especially alone, is an invitation to be assaulted, robbed and/or rape.
When I wrote this a couple of days ago, I wanted to incorporate an anecdote from 7-8 years ago, before I was completely redpilled.
I’ve always been racially aware, but I can’t deny that 7-8 years ago, if the woman were attractive enough, and the opportunity had presented itself, I would have had sex with a black woman. At least once, just to “say I did.” I might catch some flak for that, but it’s the truth. My hormones and curiosity would have trumped my principles and integrity.
So I *almost* did just that, when I had a younger, white presenting black girl sending me messages on a dating app. I entertained the idea, and we even discussed “hooking up”. To be clear, the advances she was making were leading me to believe she would be eager and easy.
So I proposed that I come visit her at her house or apartment, and she flat out said me, “you know you can’t come into my neighborhood”. Well, that alone stopped the conversation dead in its tracks, because even 7-8 years ago, I didn’t want to have anything to do with a woman from literally the ghetto, even if I was curious about having sex with a black woman. There are subtle but important differences between middle class blacks who get along in white society vs a ratchet from the inner city.
But the point is, she didn’t hesitate to make sure I was aware that my safety would be threatened if I was seen in her neighborhood. This is something we all know. Even white liberals know this. Their turf is no place for white men, or white women who don’t want to deal with catcalls or sexual assault. Yet the same isn’t true for white neighborhoods. If we see a suspicious black in our neighborhood, and call the police, it’s likely to make national headlines even if no arrest is made or violence occurs. All the black has to do is post about it on social media, for it to go viral, and CNN will be doing a front page story about it.
It’s an appalling double standard, but what are we going to do?
What are we going to do? Toughen ourselves up.
Real question: what can we white nationalists (no, in this case, just plain racial truthtellers; ie, honest men) do in light of chronic white race-liberal (which includes many non-racial-issue “conservatives”) avoidance of “psychic disturbance” wrt racial reality? We can get in their faces at every opportunity. No, I don’t mean wearing a swastika, literally or verbally (neo-Nazis have done incredible “optics” damage to our cause over the long postwar decades of white dispossession, I must say, even though I personally am not offended by their views, but don’t share them, either). I do mean relentlessly calling attention to racial double standards, as well as instances of nonwhite savagery or mere interracial difference. One should never ever let an opportunity for racial education go unremarked. Be polite (I know, sometimes it’s difficult); judge your audience (ie, how far into redpilling you can go without initiating a ‘flight’ response); know your facts way in advance.
But just keep at ’em. Of course, while metapolitical work is valuable to an extent, what is most needed is political organization. The edifice of white nationalist thought is being built, and that is an ongoing project. But we basically know what we want, even if there are gaps in our knowledge (particularly in the field of racial ethics and the integration of sociobiological understanding into classical Occidental political philosophy, and perhaps Christian theology, too, among other topics). It is too bad that Richard Spencer turned out to be such a swine (and tactical idiot), because we really do need a political wing to what remains very much an intellectual/cultural (and far too online) movement.
That wing must for a long while fly “under radar”; ie, it must be able to appeal to heartland White Americans, most of whom are Christians, or at least have come out of a Christian (and/or liberal-individualist) background. Whites are very quick to adhere to individual rights and universalist moral norms, and that fact must always be remembered in crafting messages that can educate while also appealing to white values (yet another reason why wearing the swastika was such a disaster for white advocates in the past; plus persons doing so in this day and age suggest weak moral character, which will usually prove unreliable in the clutch (cf. Matt Heimbach)).
Most of all, however, one must be of the mindset that we are in this for the long haul, and that we ourselves will probably not see our efforts reach full fruition. It took hundreds of thousands (to maybe millions) of years of differential evolution to produce the Great Race. This age of white aberration might seem interminable from our personal perspectives, but, despite the terrible danger we face today, I hold fast to the belief that it is merely a wayward blip in the ultimate destiny of our people. I have always found that taking the Long View is wonderfully calming and sustaining, and perhaps others will, too.
Very good points. Sometimes, we have to realize that each of us are just eddies in the stream of the White race. As for overt organization, at times like these I wish Whites had their own mutual aid/legal defense society such as those the Chinese and Jews have as well as gun owners. Politically, we need to support issues the people support (and that are, hopefully, good for the people), but we also need to focus on legislation or policy that furthers the goal of White well-being and thwarts the task of White dispossession. Perhaps a Constitutional amendment to afford the protections of all civil rights law and interpretation to Whites. Kind an ‘Equal Protection Under the Law’ Act.
“Good luck out there. It’s going to get worse before it gets better.”
Good article. Just a minor correction. It’s going to get A LOT worse. And it’s debatable if it will ever get better. Most stories don’t have a happy ending.
Q: What do you say to a jogger in a business suit?
A: “Will the defendant please rise.”
Part of this article has a ‘blame the victim’ tone to it. The McMichaels are complicit in the high-tech lynching that is occurring right now because they should have known better than to give a damn and take action in accordance with the law? The McMichael’s GoFundMe page was taken down almost immediately after it was created. I haven’t found out why, but my guess would be because working-class Southern men cannot be allowed to garner support from those who wish to do so. Trump will almost certainly come out and grovel for Jogger-Americans and his DOJ will almost certainly file additional BS federal ‘hate crime’ charges against the McMichaels. Is any lawyer even going to step forth to defend these men? There are at least two GoFundMe pages for this Jogger (one by the SPLC). Between COVIDmania and JoggerPallooza, I’m feeling like ‘brain valve go pop’.
It was certainly not my intention to convey that kind of tone. My point is to let this be a warning to people that the laws that our forefathers established to protect us and our communities from ne’er-do-wells have been subverted and will be twisted against us. Even if they are ultimately acquitted, there will be lawfare from Jewish attorneys for years that will cripple them financially. They’re reputations in the local community will never be the same. This is a warning to those in our circles (who may be statistically more on edge and ready to “pull the trigger” so to speak when in a confrontation) that we should be extra careful, because there will be no benefit of the doubt extended to us, no justice, and if our internet history is dug into, we’ll not only be thrown under the bus, we’ll be buried there.
I won’t lie and say I don’t have a queasy feeling about the concept of “citizens arrests”. It’s a little too easy to construe that as vigilanteism. I mean, flip the script. What would you do if you were in the reverse roll, and you were a white guy who had to pass through a black neighborhood, and one of the blacks thought you were up to no good? (Clearly the evidence points to Arbery being a criminal, but there ARE instances where innocent misunderstandings take place). Under the current “egalitarian” system we live under, a posse of black men have a right to “citizens arrest” a white guy too. What would you do if a couple of homies with guns came at you, indicating that they were suspicious of your motives for being in their neighborhood, and said they were “arresting” you? Perhaps you would do the sensible thing and cooperate in order to not get shot, but wouldn’t you think it absurd that a posse of black men could detain you with guns in such a way? Wouldn’t that feel wrong to you?
Sometimes I have to take a step back, and do my best to view things in an unbiased way, NOT because I think having biases is wrong, but rather because I do have to frame things in my mind the way my enemies frame them in order to understand my enemy, and also to know when my enemy has a rational point. (Which they sometimes do)
If I were king, we’d have a segregated society at the very least, where people knew the segregation laws, and laws were enforced fairly and for the betterment of all. But that isn’t the system we live under, so here we are.
Under the current “egalitarian” system we live under, a posse of black men have a right to “citizens arrest” a white guy too.
Does that scenario make any sense? Blacks don’t enforce they law, they break it. In such a scenario, they would just shoot the White person and go back to their homes. If a video came out showing the execution, it would be buried except in the White Advocate press. You’re imagining that Blacks are like Whites when they’re not, or at least not enough Blacks embrace ‘acting White’ to make it a problem for Blacks like Arbery. Two elderly White people were killed the day after the ‘kilt wiy joggin’ video came out. They were killed by a Black with a hunting rifle that had a scope. Media response outside the White Advocate media? Crickets.
Sometimes I have to take a step back, and do my best to view things in an unbiased way, NOT because I think having biases is wrong, but rather because I do have to frame things in my mind the way my enemies frame them in order to understand my enemy, and also to know when my enemy has a rational point. (Which they sometimes do).
I agree that trying understand your enemy is important. But is that the result of your looking at things from an ‘unbiased’ perspective? What actionable intelligence do you have now after performing your thought experiment? If the victory of non-Whites over Whites holds any lessons for Whites, it’s that solidarity is more important than objectivity.
The fact that a posse of black men aren’t going to attempt a “citizens arrest” on a white man, and would just get straight to shooting them, no questions asked, has nothing to do with the fact that they HAVE THE RIGHT TO citizens arrest, equally shared with whites. Their impulsiveness notwithstanding.
The reality of the system we live in, as clown world as it is (read my essay, I make it clear that it is clown world) is still reality. The risk of someone being killed (and that someone could very well have been one of the McMichaels), isn’t/wasn’t worth the choice that was made. A few hundred bucks worth of power tools? Come on.
Please understand. I am on their side. I realize that they were well within the boundaries of the law as it is written. But laws are not always fixed or written in stone, and even if these men are acquitted, they are going to be made examples of. I want to prevent others like them from suffering the same fate, or worse.
I don’t think it is fair that you’re questioning my motive or sincerity.
If my remarks appeared to question your motives or your sincerity, my apologies. I doubt neither. We are having a disagreement over perspectives on this matter. I don’t think American Whites can continue to use our considerable powers of cognition — such as you possess — to make arguments that even give credence to our enemy’s perspective. The effort is rarely — virtually never — reciprocated.
On the ‘vigilante’ issue: If you were in a strange neighborhood, how would you react to two armed White men stopping you to ask you what you were doing? I think my reaction would be tinged with fear, but my behavior would be respectful. What about you? Arbery, on the other hand attacked an armed man, hitting him in the head multiple times while attempting to take the gun away from him.
You and I are, I suspect, in total agreement that the McMichael/Arbery event would not have been possible in either of our ideal worlds. Blacks would simply not have unfettered access to Whites. That’s why I’m a White Nationalist. Racial separation is the only way forward for Whites, whether that separation is de facto as it is today, or de jure as it was in the days of segregation.
The point of your article is clear and sound: be irreproachable.
It’s recklessness that suggests, “Don’t be a coward!” then trots out platitudes about how things “should” be, and what’s “legal”, ignoring that determining what’s legal is often done at great expense and with deprivation of freedom.
As avowed race-realist whites, we are one of the world’s tiny minorities; we need everyone we can get. So wisely choose the hill you die on; winding up in prison for life is a tragic, consequential loss for more than just ourselves.
I hope they calculated that risk knowingly, because it was a big one.
I believe it’s more of a cautionary tale here. It’s true that the usual sort of street crime seldom gets more attention than one day’s mention in the local news, if that. On the other hand, every “Man Bites Dog” story – or apparent one, as in this case – has the potential of turning into a nationwide media feeding frenzy, sometimes sparking riots. (That’s one more reason why diversity doesn’t work, of course, making it difficult to govern the country, but all that’s another topic.) Also, we can’t assume that the law is impartial and immune to political pressure. You can bet that the MSM will run it through their narrative filter too. That’s wrong, even infuriatingly so, but it’s what we’re faced with presently.
Therefore, one must choose one’s battles carefully. (If someone’s personal safety is in danger, that counts.) Otherwise, there’s something to the number one rule of life in NYC, “Don’t get invuolved.”
I very much agree with the “cautionary tale” interpretation. They may have acted within the law, but I don’t think they gave sufficient consideration to the political climate. My supposition is they allowed their emotional state to dictate their actions.
That said, I want to support any whites who refuse to allow blacks to walk all over them. So even though I am very skeptical of citizens arrests even in an all-white society — I tend to doubt the “fine upstanding citizen” qualities of people who’d perform one — in this limited context, I would agree with Hamburger that solidarity is more important than objectivity.
I’m not so sure of the ‘heat of the moment’ explanation of their failure to account for ‘optics’. One of McMichaels is a former law enforcement officer and they appear to have covered all of their legal bases in trying to stop Arbery from leaving the neighborhood. The McMicheals are not political operatives. They’re just ordinary working-class White men who decided to help their neighbors deal with a emergent situation. They didn’t — as is repeated even in this comments section — ‘chase’ Arbery. The McMichaels were trying to stopArbery from leaving the neighborhood (that is what the video footage shows). It was Arbery to escalated the situation by attempting to seize the shotgun. The best place to start in these ‘racist White kills non-White’ is to assume the non-White was completely at fault. I believe that is the case here. Solidarity is more important than objectivity or fairness. Whites need to reflexively and intransigently take their own side. Let our enemies make their own excuses and arguments.
This is simply a ‘be aware of your surroundings’ article. White people are surrounded by enemies who are looking to jam us up in every situation, and they have most of the power. Be smart.
Yes and no, Hamburger.
The McMichaels are experiencing a terrible injustice, one arising out of the ultimate injustice we all face, that of being coercively (dare I say “imperialistically”?) integrated with ideologically hostile and viciously criminal genetic aliens. Whites and blacks were never meant to share the same ecological niche, let alone democratic polity (of course, to be relentlessly fair, or “white”, whose fault was that? the “we shoulda picked our own cotton” regret is apposite, yet again). My heart bleeds for these fine white men, who by all the evidence not only did nothing wrong legally, let alone morally, but actually exhibited the character of the godly, and the hearts of heroes. A perfect alignment of moral and martial character, the proper combination of which comprises “virtue”, and whose widespread instantiation in our people in the past enabled us to create the world’s master civilization.
So I’m clearly pro-McMichaels. I’m also pro-advancing white genetic interests, and that means being pro-smart optics as well as behavior. Was their behavior smart optically (let alone personally)? I think not. My very first thoughts when I heard this were along the lines set forth so well by Alex Graham in the companion piece to this one. Arbery was a thug engaged in some type of criminal activity; the McMichaels were within their rights to do as they did (a criminal defense attorney friend of mine, who supports their case politically, thinks they have to and will be acquitted as a matter of law, unless the jury is somehow intimidated by black street threats and thuggery – a real possibility); but that chasing a racially privileged (black) man down a street while brandishing guns, all for a non-violent crime, should have been understood to be not very smart given the evil times we live in. The only situation in which they should have acted as they did was if Arbery had just committed a mugging (maybe), or definitely a shooting, rape or murder. In this precise case, I think I myself (possibly to my discredit, I’m not sure) would have just called the cops, and made sure to notify the unoccupied property’s owner if known.
(When I was much younger I might have done the precise same thing, but I’ve learned a bit since then, plus my fellow whites are much bigger brainwashed douchebags than they were even as late as the 1970s-80s, and there are so many more of our enemies now in absolute numbers. Be smart. We’re in it to win it – over the long haul. Some stolen powertools are not worth ruining the lives of loyal white men, however unjustly.)
Real whites are an oppressed minority group in America. We need to accept this, even as we plot and work to undermine our dispossession, and one day repossess our stolen homeland.
As long as our enemies control the means of semiotic production, anything Whites do in our own defense will be framed as an act of evil. This is the Basic Narrative. In this, Mike Enoch is right. While the Narrative makes room for good Whites, it does not make room for ‘good Whites’ who advocate for Whites. All Whites who act in White interest are evil.
I back the McMichaels because their White and are under attack by non-Whites, not because I think what they did was ‘right’ or ‘optical’. They’re White. They’re under attack. That’s all I need to know.
Yeah, it’s a know-nothing way to look at things. But it’s clarifying and, the one thing I’ve learned over the last couple of years is that what I learned in the previous decades is disabling. In order to not be caught up in the snares that were embedded in what I was taught about non-Whites and Whites, I need to keep my thinking simple (at least a first). Much of ‘education’ is simply Pavlovian training to make sure that Stimulus A (‘racist’) induces Reaction A (revulsion and fear). Becoming a ‘real White’ (as you put it), entails quite a bit of ‘deprogramming’.
Contrast and compare:
https://www.takimag.com/article/racial-revenge/
Here’s another case for comparison:
https://people.com/crime/ark-woman-befriended-moms-killer-out-of-spiritual-obligation-and-then-he-murdered-her/
Well, at People magazine reported it! We’ll see if it turns up on CNN (don’t hold your breath).
Just the fact that this story has exploded into tireless stories on all channels all the time, tells us who our enemies are and how relentless they remain in defending ‘the oppressed’, and so — this CC post is entirely correct that we have to pick our battles, and THIS is what happens when we are not careful. These two fellows had already called the police, the correct thing to do, and then they should have just dropped the chase and waited for the police. A crime report is the best we can hope for. in such an encounter But vigilante acts like this just give us all a bad name., though I am 50-50 percent sure they were right about their observations.
Yes. Precisely.
And there’s another spin on this that I haven’t really seen talked about. The father is a retired detective of some sort with connections in the local justice system.
While his suspicions about our jogger were most likely correct, and he had cause to notify the police and *arguably* follow the jogger from a safe distance, I suspect a little bit of “Barney Fife” syndrome here. (That’s a reference to an old 60s sitcom with Andy Griffith of “Matlock“ fame for the non-American and younger readers).
Once that badge was turned in to his chief and he cleaned out his wall locker, he became a citizen. His cops and robber days were over.
AGAIN, I’m not against the guy. He was well within his rights. But he and his son were doing something that only certain “types” of people do. 99% of us aren’t going to go chasing criminals with loaded weapons. Cops and cop wannabes and antisocial “play army” types do this kind of thing. There IS a place for people like that. SOMETIMES they do some good. Look at that security guard in the Atlanta Olympics, Richard Jewell. He was this type of guy. He was a hero in my mind. But it was more of a case of being the right guy at the right place at the right time. Had the Stars never lined up that way, he would have spent his entire life harassing college frat boys for their drinking binges and that sort of humdrum.
I am a law and order kind of guy, but I believe in restrained law enforcement and I at heart DO believe in the “innocent until proven guilty” principle. I have 2 sons. Young men in GENERAL are always going to be more suspect to law enforcement than older people and women. Even white men. If you are a young man, you have a much higher chance of being wrongfully arrested or harassed by law enforcement than other demographics. Sometimes that leads to tragedy. I’m of the opinion that simple burglary isn’t really justification for ex cops to go grab their guns, even if they feel that they are doing something good for their neighbors. Let the guys with badges do their jobs.
You, and we, all are afraid of the current elite. This is the obvious conclusion. All of us want to avoid direct conflict with those that hold the power. At the same time there seems to be a belief that somehow, almost like a miracle, things will change to our advantage.
And we need to do nothing else but redpill a tiny percentage of people (who will, of course, by pain of hard punishment, avoid conflict with the powerful and violent elite). Likely scenario indeed.
No matter what you think about Hitler and national socialists, they did not accept this. They stood up and fought. Not with guns, not with violence, but with people. They went to the people, they talked to the people, they got the support of the people.
Yet everything was against them: money, media, army, the whole power structure.
But, you see, they could not hide behind the screen of internet and write nice things about the future with a revolution. No way, they had to build it up, with comrades, openly, building on the trust earned with the people, by the people.
Are we afraid of the people? If we are, there is no point to be a wise-ass nowhere, behind the anonymity.
Let’s admit it. We all have to go out, to the people, with the people. Openly.
Look at organizations like The Nordic Resistance Movement. They are known. When people notice them on the streets, they say: “Wow, hey, this is the Resistance guys…”. You earn the respect by being with the people and showing that you are there.
The opposition will never go away. We have to come out of the goddamn closet.
My honest opinion. I have been in the demonstrations, have seen comrades beaten by aggressive and powerful police. But still, we came out as winners, every time.
Wake up. This is all nice and comfy here on these pages, but there is a feeling of something musty and smelly, nothing much happening… If you allow me to say so, with due respect.
I understand and agree with you, and this is ultimately what “Hamburger Today” and a few others are saying.
However, I’m not suggesting that we never fight, nor am I naively suggesting that the war can be won without losing some comrades and making sacrifices.
My message is simply, pick your battles. No war, be it conventional, social, virtual, or whatever, was every won without strategy. Fighting your enemy, guns ablazing, every time, every place, no matter how healthy or strong you are, or whether you’re outnumbered or not, in a blitzkrieg or kamikaze manner, is a sure means to ultimately lose the war, not win it.
Charlottesville is a prime example of this. We naively went into enemy territory, in a state and community whose government was CLEARLY not on our side, with no coherent strategy, with “leadership” at odds with each other both in private and in public, and everything played right into the enemy’s hands. You can lose a few battles and ultimately win a war, but you can’t lose every battle the same way because of the same ill conceived notions that always cause the battle to be lost, and then hope that a miracle happens and we finally win the war.
My primary concern about the events that transpired here is that most people, even people who otherwise are sympathetic to us, do not believe that it’s OK for citizens to chase down other citizens with guns, at least not over property disputes. If someone had been physically harmed by the jogger, a girl had been raped, a child molested, and elderly person injured etc, then there would be entirely more sympathy for the McMichaels. I dare say even the MSM, save for the most insane outlets like Buzzfeed, Vice, Vox, or Huffpost, would not touch this if the jogger had been reasonably suspected of committing violent acts. It’s the fact that the crime that was committed (evidently stealing a hand gun from a vehicle, possibly some fishing poles, and suspicion of casing a new construction site for tools to pawn) does not rise to the occasion of residents chasing someone with loaded weapons. YOU may disagree with the notion of being (relatively) softer on thieves than in times past. (Honestly, I myself think that harsh punishment for thieves is justified). The problem is in how it is carried out. By vigilantes or by the police? I’m sorry, but I can’t be in favor of vigilanteism. Thats a recipe for chaos that is not good for anyone, black OR white. Not if we want to have and maintain 2nd amendment rights in an increasingly hostile world.
I support the McMichaels. I’m willing to fight THAT battle, but what I’m saying is, THEY should have picked their battles better, because this likely won’t end well for THEM.
Agreed, of course.
I have deleted my text now at least ten times and decided the KISS-method is best.
Get organized. Two is 100 % more than one. Do something else, do not only act as an online warrior.
As I see it, and that is totally unbelievable, there seem to be not even a single organization for the White Nationalism. Where can you go, if you want to demonstrate for your people? I see nothing out there. Where can you go and actually meet some people that you agree with? Here, now? Ok, but actually talk with somebody without enemy recording it? And I tell you, they record these pages, it goes without saying, but who cares.
You should have some things that would have some history. A day when you always demonstrate, so that everybody knows, we will go out, whether it will be hell or high water, we will be there. A “Summer Weekend”, every July. Collect the comrades together, arrange meetings, outdoor sport, lectures, board games,whatever, sing some songs. Build up camaraderie. Walk the walk. Enemy has hundreds of bloody organizations just for organizing our mass murder.
Start producing, and spreading leaflets. Legit, of course. Produce a banner, put it over a busy motorway bridge: “White Man, not one step back anymore!” or anything to that effect, you will soon find some real word artists, no worries.
Organize. Other things will follow.
Resistance Lives! And, hey, the guy who will lead us from this darkness, lives already, but he perhaps does not know it yet, but he is amongst us already.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Edit your comment