Counter-Currents
851 words
Whites possess innate psychological and emotional traits that Jews consciously and instinctively exploit to their advantage. Underlying all else is inborn Jewish dominance. Jews are naturally dominant over every race on earth, including whites. Other factors, such as Gentile ambition, self-centeredness, and greed; “fear of the Jews” (fright at the entire gamut of economic, social, legal, psychological, and physical terrorism at their disposal)—or, alternatively, admiration for Jewish brutality—and so forth, play a role as well.
Whites love to blame their own people—not themselves, personally, but their own kind—for evil thoughts, words, and deeds that Jews are objectively responsible for. Exculpating Jews and blaming whites or Gentile non-whites when the facts do not warrant it imparts a sense of moral superiority. Thus, Jews alone among the peoples of the world are virtually never held accountable for their crimes or innumerable lies. Instead, innocent or less guilty parties—even victims, particularly galling if you have a sense of justice—are blamed. The reason for this preferential treatment is hard to discern, but as a brute fact it is undeniable.
Whites admire money, and Jews have it. Whites are awed by the display of great wealth, and Jews ostentatiously flaunt it. Whites venerate social status—Jews are very high status. Class-wise, Jews can never be haughtily looked down upon the way so many whites can be. Whites esteem power, and Jews possess it. Whites envy (but don’t practice in their natural habitat) unrestricted sexual license, and Jews sexually exploit and prostitute good-looking Gentiles without inhibition, remorse, or conscience. Observe all the attractive young female TV anchors and reporters in New York City, or actresses in Hollywood, who have Jewish boyfriends or husbands. Whites view Jews as more intelligent than themselves, and admire that, too. Jews are society’s main intellectuals and comprise the core of academia.
The deepest-dyed philo-Semites perceive Jews as especially holy and ethical, a recurring theme in their many hosannas to the race.
One such American, a white businessman, published an expensive display ad, twice, a decade apart, in a local Jewish community newspaper under the headline “What the Jewish people have meant to me.” He said: “What makes the Jewish people so special? Is it the total commitment to a friendship? The respect and love for their country [he wisely omitted to say which one] . . . generous to a fault, if it means ideals . . . caring for their fellow man . . . helpful, loving and honest.” (Ellipses and touch-and-go grammar in the original.)
The businessman extravagantly praised 26 local Jews by name—apparently personalization of this kind is important to them. The list included his physician of 25 years, his attorney, his two clothiers, his first business customer, and a Jew “who taught me that you could be very wealthy and yet remain very humble.” Another, Brown, “likes to say that he made me a wealthy man. Thanks Al, but before you, I had lots of help!” (I.e., the other Jews mentioned.)
Another man “sheds happiness wherever he goes,” and five, all individually named, possessed “the same generous smile and warmth.” Then there was the “little rabbi who told me at a Lubavitch dinner that I should be doing more for the young Jewish people. Little did he know that I belong to Calvary Lutheran!”
There wasn’t a bad apple in the bunch.
He concluded, “May God bless you all. I thank you all for being my friends.”
Particularly odious in light of how much Jews have done to foul sexual relationships and mores among whites, destroy the family, and bring about white population collapse and racial destruction through mixing, replacement migration, and anti-white laws, the turd said, “How come only men? Where were all the Jewish girls? Simple . . . there weren’t any. My one fling was handled by a very lovely girl. She taught me respect and that her future did not include me.” He was white, you see.
The asshole talked and acted exactly like billionaire conglomerateur Warren Buffett, who’s the same kind of philo-Semite, albeit a slightly more calculating one.
The businessman was in love. Especially striking was his sweeping generalization “the Jewish people.” He wasn’t talking about individual Jews, he was talking about all Jews, the entire group.
His perception, which fanatic philo-Semites all share, signifies pathological moral deficiency. Genuine morality and philo-Semitism are incompatible. They are a contradiction in terms. Show me a philo-Semite and I’ll show you a fundamentally immoral person. What Jesus said 2,000 years ago remains true today: “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchers, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.”
The alleged outer beauty I cannot see, but its luster is apparently evident to others.
The important lesson is that not all whites think alike, and some harbor ardent, irrational (emotional), unrequited adoration for Jews. They wish they could be Jews (Harvard University political science professor Robert Putnam is another example), and there is nothing they would not do for them. Nothing.
In the great race war, such people grant no quarter to their fellow whites, and no quarter must be granted in return.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
45 comments
Yes, among many Whites there seems to exist a fatal fascination for their own destroyers, the Jews. Why that is so is difficult to say. Is it the myth of their “chosenness”, their “intelligence” or their “suffering”? Or do Jews have that fatal charm by which the typical psychopath manages to bewitch his victims again and again? Be it as it may, as professional parasites the Jews have mastered the art of psychologically manipulating their host populations for their own purposes and they have gained experience in this art for more than 2000 years. Many unsuspecting Gentiles fall for their tricks and it takes special training to see through them. But once their ways and their history has been understood, their lies don’t work anymore, yeah become hilariously ridiculous. Remains the task to convince your fellows of your insight, but then you get the frustrating experience that it takes as much time to do that as it took yourself, which is many years.
Take comfort, Andrew. The Jews have a saying: “A philo-Semite is just an anti-Semite who likes Jews.”
The more you meditate upon this wise observation, I predict, the more comforted you will become. I myself was a philo-Semite until the day I read Culture of Critique.
Knowing Jews exist is half the struggle. The rest is reversing the polarities. Jews instinctively distrust people who know that they exist, which is why, I think, they can never get enough of these little assurances that they are the most wonderful people in the world. Was it Joe Biden who got so caught up in effusive praise of the Jews that he let a little too much of the truth spill over? Jews have psychological quirks and predilections that we can use against them, too, especially their high neuroticism, paranoia, and anxiety.
You make several funny—and perceptive—observations. I am well aware that even some philo-Semites make Jews uneasy. You would think a politician who has been around as long as Biden, and risen as high as he did, couldn’t possibly put his foot in his mouth. Yet, lo and behold, he did. On the other hand, two or three days elapse and it’s down the memory hole. Who remembers?
Half the battle for Jews is not being seen. That’s why the Jewish monopoly Google, which partners in censoring the Internet with the ADL, has rendered the search algorithm “Someone’s Name” “Jewish” virtually useless.
Of course, the more power they get, the noisier and more obtrusive they become. Witness Chuck Lorre’s television shows, Family Guy, and numerous other examples. Still, it’s not as if Gentiles ever catch on.
At any rate, I’m not comforted. I’ll feel comforted once there is hard evidence to justify it. In the 1960s there was plentiful talk about a “White Backlash” against forced integration that would materialize any day and change everything. Now we’re balancing precariously on the precipice of nonexistence globally—in an “anti-racist” world that outlaws genocide as a crime against humanity!
The Best of All People have a tighter grip on the tiller than ever.
‘Jews are naturally dominant over every race on earth, including whites.’
A truly cringeworthy statement, full of falsehood.
‘Whites are awed by the display of great wealth, and Jews ostentatiously flaunt it.’
A stupid generalization, since not even a majority of whites are impressed by ostentatious displays of wealth. The lowest sectors, socially and morally, but no one of merit.
Stop promoting a ‘metaphysics of defeat’!
Eos , are you european ? Though I strongly appreciate A. Hamilton , I must say that to consider jews as ” dominant ” is unthinkable for an european mind . Maybe our old aristocratic past ? We have the same lack of understanding for K. MacDonald work , ( despite its great value ) , sometimes .
Sure the old cliché : america = no past , no history , no aristocraty , is stupid , but there is something there . Sadly , I’m not enough fluent in anglo-amercian to explain what I feel when I read this sort of things .
A analogy : imagine a low cast hysterical woman who terrorizes and completely dominates his devirilized husband . Is this woman dominant ?
There would be a lot to say about the inherent feminine nature of the jews .
I agree. One, I don’t believe it. Two, if it were true, why keep saying it? Especially on a website that is trying to inculcate a sense of identity in our people…
“A stupid generalization, since not even a majority of whites are impressed by ostentatious displays of wealth. The lowest sectors, socially and morally, but no one of merit. ”
Yeah, right.
Hamilton’s not talking about ostentatious displays of wealth along the lines of African “bling bling.”
Whites are impressed by refined, nuanced displays of wealth and the power it buys. Especially the white middle-class, most of whom want nothing more than to live off dividend income, pursue work and leisure on their terms, and treat working-class whites with disdain – like the top 1%.
And yes, jews are dominant in ‘Murika. The Achilles Heel of the White man is greed and gaining one upmanship over fellow Whites. The refusal to recognize this simply means that many WNists are nothing more than yesterday’s Republicans.
To clarify, I absolutely do not deny the problem of Jewish power in America. Any history or analysis of the country that doesn’t address it is incomplete. And any attempt at renewal that doesn’t neutralize it will be inadequate.
I was addressing the exact meaning of this statement:
‘Jews are naturally dominant over every race on earth, including whites.’
which posits as a sort of cosmic law that the rule of Jewry over all peoples is inevitable. This false idea is often implied by certain critics of Jewry.
I agree that the statement is too sweeping, and smacks of despair. However, power today unquestionably rests almost entirely on finance, and so long as our collective unconscious places money and material wealth above all other considerations, I do agree that Jews as a group will be “naturally dominant”, if for no other reason that they as a group understand how the game is played, while gentiles are generally wandering around clueless and bewildered.
I believe it was Ernst Junger who noted that WWII was the “final victory of the technician over the warrior”. He could have replaced “technician” with “businessman” or “banker”, and been just as correct.
” Jews are naturally dominant over every race on earth, including whites”
Uh, no. Too many WN’s chose to absorb not only pre-Boas anthropology [good] but also the truly outdated “White man’s burden” notions as well [bad]. As China overtakes the US (next year, according to the IMF, about a decade ahead of schedule) WN’s still live in a dream world of “once we get rid of the Jews the White sahib will rule the darkies again. Thanks to Mao a majority of mankind already lives free of White AND Jewish domination, while YT still groans under the Jewish boot.
Of all types of conquests, spiritual conquest is probably the worst, the most scathing, visceral and long-lasting. The conquered is compelled to forget their own ancestors, their organic founding myths and legends and their attitudes to the divine are altered.
The Indo-European culture has been in conflict with the mid-east (what would later become Abrahamic) desert world-view for a long time. The Mitannis, an Indo-European aristocratic-warrior elite, were already ruling over proto-semitic people in 2nd mil BC in the deserts of the mid-east which they had conquered. They were in permanent conflict with Egypt too. Hittites of Anatolia were another I-E lot in constant struggle with proto-Abrahamics. Greeks, an I-E people, could never reconcile their world-view with inhabitants of Judea. Abrahamic Islam when it finally prevailed over I-E Iran (7th century AD) tried to wipe out Iranians’ historical memory and partly succeeded.
We can say that Christianity, an Abrahamic idea, spiritually conquered Rome in 4th century AD. (But real Rome had probably died before that anyway and was ripe for conquest.) Over the next 1000 years all the I-E lands in Europe would be subdued.
A spiritually conquered Germanic man forgot that he was descended from Mannus (Sanskrit – Manu) and Tuisto (Sanskrit – Tvasta, proto IE – Tiwaz) and was bending his knees before Adam and Eve (Aadham and Hawaa for Hebrews / Arabs) and Avram and Yaqob!!
The dominance over America of the neocons and the Christo-Zio is the 2nd conquest of Rome and the impact will be very corrosive. These are very depressing times indeed. I often wonder will the inheritor I-E cultures and the historic memories survive at all.
“Thanks to Mao a majority of mankind already lives free of White AND Jewish domination”
Mao’s government was actually full of Ashkenazi Jews.
Where there is Communism there is jews.
Implying that the average white has the slightest clue that they are ruled by Jews is a mistake. The vast majority simply have no idea. Jews are wise to be suspicious of any gentile, anywhere who has learned the filter the world through a Jew/Gentile lens, be they philo or anti.
Someone who hasn’t grown up around Jews can never truly realize that, from an early age, Jewish children begin developing an ability to place each person they come across into a descriptive box, the most basic being, of course, Us/Them. This ability in gentile children stays dormant.
I’m sure most of us here went through a phase, at the beginning of our transition, of madly googling name after name, every person we came across on the television, newspaper or history book. In effect, this was each of us developing our own undeveloped filters. That filter is something that each Jew has almost as a birthright, but presently a vanishingly small number of gentiles do.
Hamilton’s article, while good in other respects, assumes that a majority of whites have this filter, and know that they are being ruled by Jews, when the vast majority simply have no idea.
I disagree. I think everyone of average to above intelligence is to some extent aware of Jewish power, hence the widespread hesitancy to even say the word “Jew.” It is always “Jewish person” — often preceded by “nice.”
The phrase “somewhat aware” tells the story. I agree that the average person of average intelligence is aware that Jews generally have money, are good in business, and so on. But this is a far cry from realizing their often pervasive influence in the halls of power.
The average person actually believes that Barack Obama is the most powerful man in the world, that Magic Johnson actually bought the Los Angeles Dodgers and will soon buy the Clippers (as opposed to being a black “Faceman” for the Guggenheim group with a 1-2% stake) and so on. Most people just don’t give that much thought to the matter, unfortunately.
Planting seeds in acquaintances and letting those seeds take root can really bear fruit, however. 3-4 years ago, I broached the topic of hidden anti-white messages in entertainment aimed at children, particularly Disney animated films with a female acquaintance. She reacted predictably at first, with immediate references to the holocaust and a general tone of unease. Well, I saw the same woman just a couple of weeks ago, who regaled me with her own analysis of the recent hit “Frozen” (massively popular right now with little girls) and its hidden messages.
So it can be done.
I wasn’t aware we were ruled by Jews until I woke up. I took the idea that Jews were behind the Iraq war as just another conspiracy theory. I even half-read some article about the “fact” that Israel actually hadn’t liked the idea at all, and I used to believe that US love of Israel is the result of the backward religious fanaticism of American Protestants, who take the Bible literally and think that Jews are God’s Chosen People and should be supported by Christians. Because, you know, I also used to believe that Democrats don’t support Israel much, or that the most ardent critiques of Israel are actually highly ethical Jews like Chomsky.
I don’t know about you, but most people I know knew very little about Jews. I grew up in a country much less politically correct than the US (Hungary), but even people making “anti-Semitic” remarks are often truly ignorant about the depth of the Jewish question, which can be seen from the fact that many of them start drop “anti-Semitism”, in fact, many people saying this or that about the Jews no longer says anything about them, and I had one such person even defending them. Political correctness is slowly coming to Hungary, in spite of Jobbik and what not.
Back to the Iraq war as an example: the US president was a gentile, who could have said no (maybe they were blackmailing him, but I doubt it), just as the influential vice president, the secretary of defense, the Secretary of State, Bush’s national security advisor was gentile, etc. The richest people in the US are mostly gentile, this was the reason at the time I thought it was a crazy conspiracy theory to believe that Jews could influence the political process through their riches – sure those gentiles would influence it the other direction, and whenever there would be a difference of views, the more numerous and richer gentiles would prevail, wouldn’t they? In retrospect, that was a simplistic and not well thought-out position (the smaller number of rich Jews could still prevail, if they were better organized, or if they controlled culture through Hollywood and the rich gentiles like Bill Gates would thoroughly absorb that culture), but that’s what I used to believe.
It was a stupid belief, yes, but I tend to think of myself as being above average intelligent. If I wasn’t so interested in politics and things like that, I would never have discovered the truth about Jews. And I tend to believe that all those people who say nice things about the Jews are usually just as clueless about Jewish power as anybody else.
** I took the idea that Jews were behind the Iraq war as just another conspiracy theory. **
I don’t remember having heard that the Iraq war was caused by Jews until a few years later. The mainstream media will never tell the truth. They will keep saying that Bush lied, there were no WMD, but they won’t explain how the Jewish neocons got rid of every opponent in the White House, in the same way they have eliminated anyone who stood against race-replacement.
At the time, the US government said the war was over WMD and bringing democracy to the Middle East, while the leftist slogan was “no blood for oil”, as if the goal was to steal Iraqi oil. Completely absurd.
In retrospect, it seems that a large part of the opposition to the Iraq war was false opposition. But most of the leftists were sincere in blaming the US government. They were encouraged to do so by the Jewish media, and they didn’t have a clue that the war was a Jewish project. I’m sure those who tried to spread the information were kept out of the mainstream media, and out of mainstream anti-war activism. Instead of them, a favorite opponent of the neocons was the clown Michael Moore. Today, most of the leftists still keep silent about the Jewish double standards for Israel and for the West. I think the problem is not leftist hypocrisy as much as Jewish ownership of the media.
** even people making “anti-Semitic” remarks are often truly ignorant about the depth of the Jewish question **
Even on American nationalist forums, it seems to me that most people who complain about Jewish mischief do not seriously accept the idea that the third-world invasion is simply due to the Jewish lobby.
How many Jews were leading all those protests against the war in Vietnam? Yet where were they for the Iraq war? That is why the protests against the Iraq war were completely toothless. No Jews were there to support us, as they wanted the war for their own interests.
Andrew Hamilton: “Jews are naturally dominant”
I have no personal experience of Jews, except on internet forums (where I am very impressed by their vulgarity and intellectual dishonesty), but what I keep reading on WN forums is that they are physical cowards.
They are in the professions that attract sociopaths: lawyers, salesmen, politicians. It seems to me they also share some character traits with the leftists: loud-mouths with contempt for the truth and for reality. But maybe it is a dominant trait: It can be useful to take the lead in a political movement.
Greg Johnson: “I think everyone of average to above intelligence is to some extent aware of Jewish power”
Until ten years ago, I had no idea of the problem. It is the Internet that has made me intelligent, like many other people. But I’m not in the United States.
I have seen Jews referred to as cowards also. Anyone who thinks that is making a big mistake.
Jews do not (typically) exhibit positive qualities that Aryans associate with the word bravery, so I would not use that word to describe them. But they are definitely not cowards.
Whites accused the Indians of this as well. The Indians were confused by it: Why fight against even odds if you are more sure of winning by stealth attack? Maurice Samuel goes into this in detail in his vicious book, “You Gentiles” describing our sporting or game mentality that we sometimes bring into life itself. He’s right. The ancient Celts were famous for their foolish bravery, always charging, refusing to wear armor – and always being slaughtered by the Romans. One Celtic People (some say they weren’t), the Picts, were different, valuing cunning and surprise. The Romans didn’t crush them but lost a legion to them and built a wall to keep them away.
Its all about media control, we need to demonize the jews on the mainstream media like they demonize Europeans, Arabs, anyone who is anti-ZOG.
The biggest obstacle to overcome is that whites have been breeding-down for over 2,000 years and jews have been breeding-up for at least three to five thousand years if I am correctly interpreting everything I have read. The white christians are the best human cattle ever bred. They have only once rebelled against jewish domination i. e., WWII. I give no credence to the myths of jewish usurers being killed during the middle ages.
Anybody who has read Michael Bradley (he has jewish heritage) and his thoughts regarding jewish dominance and group behaviour ?
” However, my own calculations indicate that some Middle East Semitic populations approach 50 percent Neanderthal and in some very specific small areas, 70 percent Neanderthal… There are other intellectual, emotional and philosophical characteristics in the genetic package of the Neanderthal heritage….little or no visual artistic ability; anti-feminist and anti-sexual emotions and social orientation; sexual mutilation as an expression of “religious” affiliation; extremely strong in-group cohesion; high aggression against all other groups…”
http://michaelbradley.info/
This is nonsense. K selection ice-age environments do not produce “subspecies.. characterized by.. fanatical monotheism, anti-feminism (Did feminism even exist in a glacial age? – B) and a predisposition to control, enslave or exterminate “ordinary humanity””. Prior to neanderthal admixture, Cro-magnids didn’t have any artistic or tool making ability beyond simple spears (at all).
Even the source you reference deconstructs their own argument:
“Trinkaus and Stewart subjected every Neanderthal bone then known to a forensic-style analysis and found over twice the number of violence-inflicted injuries as among any similar number of bones from other fossil humans. Nonetheless, though extremely violent, Neanderthals took care of their injured and elderly people”
Perhaps it could be that the Neanderthals had said violence-inflicted injuries from their Cro-magnon invaders, who genocided them, raped their women, and ate the men, as evidenced by neanderthal bones in fire-pits across the continent?
Normally I wouldn’t care to comment on casual anthropological ignorance, but you deserve calling out for bringing a bizarre, neurotic and frankly embarassing angle to this webpage. The Old Right is always on the lookout for someone to blame and someone to hate, and neanderthals seem to fit the demonisation bill pretty well, despite their genetic legacy in modern Europeans being the only thing that stands between being civic society and total barbarism.
This is especially ironic considering that Europids (The White Race) is a highly optimised blend of (primarily) Cro-magnon and Neanderthal DNA, and carries far more Neanderthal DNA than other racial groupings worldwide (Around 2-3% average, in comparison to your regular sub saharan, who has Zero) and it is precisely the neander genetics of introversion, exploratory incline, risk taking, artistic sentiment, etc, that inform and create the Faustian and Titanic spirit that we admire and believe our race protecting because of.
If there’s one thing the real right needs less of, it’s bizarro-land anthropology and ridiculous characterisations of our ice age ancestors.
And the percentage of Neanderthal genes is evenly spread though out the white race? Or is that too politically touchy to even discuss?
As far as I understood, the research showed that it was male Neanderthal genes that were passed on to modern man. Probably not via romantic relationships….
This is infact the opposite of truth – All Neanderthal DNA today is matrilineal.
Interesting….
I started checking discussion groups on this, and I saw none making your sweeping statement. Only that the interbreeding took place over such a long period og time, with vastly different groups of both Neanderthals and Cro-magnons, to make it impossible to conclude whether it is a matrilineal og a patrilineal descent.
Thank you for provoking a learning experience.
I believe the Northeast Asians have as much or more. All the favored races have the blood royal of the Neanderthal sub-species.
Jews dominate in the sense that women dominate men: men are deferential to women, and women can easily manipulate men, and they have done so since ages. It is also well known that women are often very cruel (not necessarily in the physical sense), both with men and with rival women. Yet when a man gets really angry, he can easily beat or even kill almost any woman. So who is dominant?
You are talking about emotional manipulation versus physical power. Yes, indeed, I have witnessed a woman emotionally manipulating a man to the point of him being physically aggressive. Usually the woman denies she did that. It is usually about putting down something the man really loves. A former friend of mine did that and was very annoyed with me when I did not give her any sympathy when he finally hit her. End of friendship. I don’t think it is about who is dominant, but about who is playing mind games. Sometimes it is in reverse, the man puts down the woman to the point of her breaking. The feminists have gone way too far in condemning men without looking at the emotional makeup of the relationship. If you are looking for someone just like mommy or just like daddy, you are going to be very disappointed. Every one comes with a history whether it is conscious or not.
Without starting a discussion on male vs female roles, I’m not sure if it would be meaningful if we said women were dominant over man. In the traditional sense of the word, women like dominant men (who are dominant over them), but then still go on manipulating them. It is not a symmetrical relationship, but also not really a hierarchical one, so I would say neither of them is dominant.
Back to the Jew-woman analogy: Jews are like a manipulative woman, they are not cowards, in fact, the whole coward-brave dichotomy does not apply to them or to their condition (just as it does not apply to manipulative women), and in that sense they might be able to manipulate whites, but they are not dominant in the normal sense of the word.
“Jews dominate whites”. They do it by deception and by strong ethnic networking.
I imagine that there’s a large self-serving element to this hagiography. The simple fact is no ethnic group – especially Jews!! – are all wonderful paragons as this slimeball makes out. Goyim businessmen who pay tribute to their masters will benefit in very practical ways. Cf. Timothy Geithner, Warren Buffet, Sean Pess plus many more.
I was raised in a non-religious household, and only got around to reading the Bible in my early twenties, i.e. only a few years ago. The Old Testament is what started my intellectual journey that would ultimately lead me to becoming an “anti-semite,” but apart from that it also radically changed my view on Christians.
It made a bit more sense to me after I looked into the history of how Christianity spread, but initially I was completely dumbfounded as to why this religion had caught on in Europe. I mean, I don’t actually take the Old Testament as a literal record of history, but according to it, the Jews/Israelites committed their first genocide of a small Gentile nation very early on. After that the Judeo-Christian god helped them to subvert the Egyptian government, enslave the Egyptian people and take all the best land in Egypt for themselves. The god the Christians pray to then helped the Jews to steal all the Egyptians’ money and murdered something on the order of a million Egyptian children just for entertainment value and to really drive the point home that the god of the Hebrews cares more about Jews than any of those filthy Goyim, which the Jews still celebrate every year on passover. Later in Exodus, the god the Christians pray to orders the Jews to murder some 7 or 8 tribes in the land of Canaan and take their land. The Tanakh goes on and on praising all sorts of crimes perpetrated by Jews against Humans. It was very hard for me to understand how Christians could worship a god who had not only helped the Jews commit all these crimes, but also treasured the JEWS(!) of all people as a special nation above all others, a holy race that is not to be defiled with Goy blood and even promised the Jews complete dominion over all nations on the earth, leaving the non-Jewish nations only the choice between death or slavery to Israel. Even if these promises are to be regarded as invalid now due to a new covenant being formed through Jesus Christ, fact is that Christians are still praying to the same god. I was really ashamed of our Christianization. It seemed like we’re an entire race of pathetic masochistic cuckolds with a special hard-on for Jews.
I had the same experience, one of the most popular earlier Christian sects tried to cut off the “Old Testament” from the Jesus teachings but the the sects that got the power from Rome had other plans.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcion
Christianity wasn’t enough for the jews, they also created Islam and helped the Arab destruction of Byzantine and Persian Empire.
Yeah Marcion is an interesting figure. A few weeks ago I made a comment about him and how we could use his and other early Christian/Gnostic ideas to create a pro-European religion:
https://counter-currents.com/2014/04/america-a-prophecy/#comment-49863
Out of the major branches of Christianity today, the least Jewish one seems to be Orthodoxy. From what I’ve read, Byzantium actually did a pretty good job resisting Jewish infiltration, which I guess is part of why it lasted for so long. Also, they have nice music.
Interestingly, I recently found out that David Icke’s stuff about Reptilians ruling the world is largely based on ancient Gnostic writings:
http://youtu.be/GtM2sqpYU9U?t=3h
I actually sat down and sacrificed one of my weekends to watch this lecture of his. He seems to have created his own little belief system, but of course he puts a politically correct hippie-dippie multi-culti new-age spin on it all.
To many of the problems he brings up, the glaringly obvious solution is nationalism, yet he never spells out this obvious solution.
To his credit, unlike many other conspiracy theorists he does talk about what he calls “Rothschild Zionism,” but he stops there. I find it interesting that the traits he ascribes to Reptilian-hybrid bloodlines — such as lack of empathy and obsession with ritualistic behavior — are pretty good descriptions of Jewish behavior, especially if we look atthe religious Jews and the hundreds of little rituals they practice in daily life. Not to mention their self-declared status as the “chosen people” of what the Gnostics called the Demiurge. I wonder whether his failure to acknowledge these things is genuinely due to his own beliefs, or if it has more to do with circumventing Britain’s stringent anti-free speech laws — or simply not wanting to loose any income by being relegated to a much smaller, anti-Jewish audience.
Lovely comment (and so sheep-like, following the “group” of the sage critics of Christianity as you do). Yes, one does wonder what European Man would have been if he had not become so pervasively Christian. Yes, I know he was once pagan in its myriad permutations, but I would like to think that even the critics would grant that two millenia of a Christian era is a reasonable period to define a peoples’ fundamental ethos. And so it has, like it or not. And being here in America, as most of us commenting here are, bashing the hell out of 100% of the founding peoples for their being Christian gives me both an idea and even a solution to the whole fundamental dilemma of the future of Whites – let them PERISH. Though not you, of course, but for them, it is only what should be due such a superstitious and feckless lot. As for your own future in such an abstract, I would simply say, “good luck.”
BTW, let me commend Mr. Hamilton for not only his gratifying writing, but also for his wisdom in not doing what others here so recklessly do – disaffect the majority of us Whites who are Christians. Indeed, he quotes Christ in a respectful way, and thus buttressing his own remarks in the piece. Your prudential tack is appreciated by us. I don’t for a moment suggest no criticism is due Christendom. There is due criticism in any and every sphere. But is not thoughtful moderation key in dealing with especially vast enterprises such as, especially, the “White man’s religion?”
Peck, peck, peck. The eternal Christian refrain: censor all criticism of Christianity in movement circles, lest the Christians take their toys and go home, which in effect admits that they are more concerned with Christianity than the survival of our race. With “friends” like this . . .
You are a fair person Mr. Johnson (you usually post my comments). But even so I thought you were yet more fair than your reply showed. You read that I said forthrightly that criticism is always due any enterprise, including Christendom. Indeed, I myself had just fiercly criticized a particularly galling mindset in evangelical circles in a recent article here. I suspect that you make this mistake because you are simply not comfortable with my ringing-the-bell of the starkly obvious reality that Christianity has been the warp-and-woof of the White man’s universe for nearly two millenia (and, no, I do not flatter myself that you care to take the time to say much in reply to me).
Finally, let me say that I am sorry for your recent troubles and glad to here the health matter has arrived at a good end. Thank you for your many efforts and I intend to send something today. Good luck on your ongoing plans.
I will say this again: Jews are at their peak, and they have nowhere to go but down.
Let’s look at some historical facts, and make some predictions:
1) Fact: Nazi Germany did serious damage to Jews. Not in the sense of discrediting them (what should have happened), but rather in the sense of numbers. Even if you don’t believe the full holocaust story, a large of number of Jews did die, and serious psychic damage was done as well…the Jewish population might well be 5-10 million stronger today if not for them
2) Fact: the Soviet Union, a former locus of Jewish power, is in the dustbin and there is no evidence that either Russia or eastern Europe is about to fall under the same spell
3) Fact: there is a considerable amount of wealth now in Asia, including China and India…and though this is not necessarily good for whites, neither is it for Jews, as these countries have a deep cultural love of physical gold in possession, as well as a high degree of traditionalism and racial awareness, and thereby can’t be controlled by Jewish financiers and propagandists
Predictions:
1) the United States of America, the Jewish empire, is surely going to fall and with it goes most of current Jewish financial and media power
2) Israel is too small and cornered to mount continued operations against the Arabs once America goes bankrupt
3) as we approach peak fossil fuels, this means peak banking and therefore Jews will have to decide between hyperinflation or deflation of their assets
Do not get obsessed with Jews, they eventually go down with all host societies and the coming fall is going to be big. Focus on preserving something for the future.
1. Disagree. NS Germany hardly did any damage to Jews. A few of them died in the camps along with thousands of Whites, and the Jews spun this into attempt at their genocide, but WWII didn’t even make a dent in global jewish power.
2. Since “communism” was merely a vehicle for Jewish power, the “USSR” (as in, jew-controlled Russia) did not die, it merely changed its name. The USSR was a Jewish state, and modern “Russia” is also a Jewish state, so there’s no qualitative difference between the two. Unless of course you think all those jewish billionaires around Putin are there for show.
3. Assuming that these nations aren’t already ruled by jews by proxy, they will be easy to dominate. The Chinese are extremely philosemitic and the Indians have good relations with Israel.
“I will say this again: Jews are at their peak, and they have nowhere to go but down.”
Jews are aware of this fact and in my opinion makes the current situation even more dangerous, something I learned in dealing with jews is to never underestimate their ‘chutzpah’, their arrogance don’t have limits.
I sometimes fantasize how if Hitler had become a religious leader instead of an political leader we would be in a much better position today. In my fantasy he would have based his religion on Friedrich Nietzsche’s excellent “Thus Spake Zarathustra.” It would have been a religion that would have eventually prevailed over christianity and saved the white race. Another dimension of this fantasy is that it begins two to three hundred years in the future, the white race has nearly become extinct. A group of desperate white scientists develop time travel and go back and take Hitler under their wing on 20 April 1889. Hitler is placed with a noble German family and he learns all the major languages of Europe and schooled in the philosophy of Nietzsche. The scientists also take Nietzsche in tow and cure his disease (whatever that was). He is schooled in all the future scientific developments and has access to all his written work from his original life and is able to complete his works. Nietzsche becomes a mentor to Hitler much in the same way Aristotle was to Alexander the Great. After WWI Hitler will began his great religious movement, eventually Julius Evola shows up and he is made the first pope of Hitler’s new church. My main fantasy though, is that the scientists go back three to five thousand years in the past and take the primitive European tribes in tow. The religion is based on Nietzsche’s work and all the basic sciences are established. This culture is based on a tripartite strategy of good hygiene, positive eugenics and progressive medicine. Just think of it a god that actually listens to his people and actually responds. I am not yet as bad as Walter Mitty’s character in James Thurber’s excellent story but I am getting there.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment