Counter-Currents
Melvin Williams, who has been accused of killing one employee and wounding another at a Subway restaurant after he complained that they had put too much mayo on his sandwich, the latest in a spate of fast food-related killings in the US.
2,629 words
Roe v. Wade Overturned, Human Progress Forever Aborted
On Friday, June 24, the US Supreme Court overturned 1973’s Roe v. Wade decision based on the premise that there is no specifically enumerated constitutional right to murder your unborn fetus.
In unison, snaggletoothed vaginas across the country began barking — and in some cases, biting.
A Colorado “Christian pregnancy clinic” was torched and covered in graffiti stating “IF ABORTIONS AREN’T SAFE, NEITHER ARE YOU.” The Vermont Statehouse had its windows smashed and was vandalized with graffiti reading “IF ABORTIONS AREN’T SAFE, YOU’RE NOT EITHER.”
Twenty-five were arrested in New York City pro-abortion protests. A makeshift flamethrower was tossed at a cop during Los Angeles protests. Tear-gas canisters were lobbed at pro-abortion protesters in Phoenix.
Earlier in June, before the Supreme Court ruling was made official but after it had been leaked, an armed man was arrested outside Brett Kavanaugh’s Maryland home. Screeching cunts camped outside Clarence Thomas’ home. Another gaggle of angry twats chanted “Fuck you, Barrett” outside Amy Coney Barrett’s home.
Ah, to be back in the good old days, when it was the anti-abortion groups who bombed clinics and issued threats.
It’s all an extremely infantile overreaction, of course. Although we’re experiencing legitimate food shortages, we are overdosing on hyperbole. According to the most recent studies, rape and incest account for only about 1.5% of all abortions. And it’s to be assumed that in most states, medication abortion will still be available via mail. Birth-control pills, too. And if, say, you were impregnated as a result of a gang rape but have an aversion to swallowing pills, you won’t be too far from a state with a thriving abortion industry that might even be willing to finagle your travel expenses and fly you in First Class just to rip that unborn child straight from your womb.
For all that they yammer about “choice,” every adult woman on Earth with an IQ over 60 is well aware of how babies are made, and in the 98.5% of abortions that don’t involve rape or incest, she made a choice to risk pregnancy. The endlessly hysterical sobbing you’re hearing about how women have completely lost control of their bodies comes largely from women who’ve completely lost their minds.
There is also copious wailing about how this ruling will set a precedent wherein a bloodthirsty and psychotic cabal of conservative judges seek to roll back, one by one, every teeny bit of progress the Supreme Court has made on “human rights,” whatever is meant by that term. We are warned that if barking vaginas don’t take to the streets and keep barking, we risk returning to the supposedly horrifying days of the 1950s.
Sarah Warbelow, legal director for LGBTQ advocacy group the Human Rights Campaign, warns,
There are clearly members of the court who have an outdated notion of what America looks like today and have a fantasy of returning to their painted idealism of a 1940s, 1950s America, certainly not what it really was in the 1940s and ’50s. And that is terrifying.
Oh, really? More terrifying than Sarah Warbelow’s face?
In his majority opinion — the only written opinion that is legally binding — Justice Samuel Alito specified that the ruling only affected abortion and was not meant to set precedent for rolling back any other Supreme Court decision:
And to ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right. Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.
But in his separate concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas pressed the “pause” button on his Long Dong Silver VHS tape long enough to suggest that the Supreme Court “should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents.” Thomas made specific reference to reconsidering rulings regarding the right to gay marriage, the right of married couples to obtain contraceptives, and the right of adults to engage in private consensual sexual acts. Thomas, who is married to a white woman, made no specific reference to overturning the 1967 Supreme Court ruling that overturned state prohibitions against marital mudsharking.
But what if all of these rulings were overturned? Why not let the states decide everything? If gay marriage and abortions are sacred to you, there will be states that cater to that. If you want sodomy outlawed, there will probably be states for that, too. Let different states cater to America’s clearly irreconcilable tribes. It may be the only peaceful way out of this.
Fast-Food Shootings: Too Much Mayo, Not Enough Duck Sauce, Missing Milkshake
Black people have long stereotyped white Americans as having an excessive fondness for mayonnaise. They’ve even concocted a racial pejorative — “mayo monkey” — to forever link whiteness and the creamy, egg-based condiment in the popular imagination.
In Atlanta, where flagrant public expressions of blackness have reached pandemic proportions, a black man named Melvin Williams has been named as the suspect in a shooting at a local Subway sandwich store inside a Circle K gas station at 6:30 PM on Sunday. The shooting left one black woman dead and another in critical condition.
According to police, the shooting began when Williams accused a Subway worker of placing too much mayonnaise on his sandwich. Apparently there were mutual feelings of reciprocal disrespect that escalated to the point where Williams allegedly pulled out his pistol and emphatically demonstrated that only a fool would monkey around with his mayo.
Atlanta Interim Chief of Police Darin Schierbaum offered a unique updated spin on the old cliché about how “We can put a man on the moon, but we can’t . . .”:
We can take down drug operations that breed violent crime, we can dismantle gang organizations that breed violent crime, we can stop robbery crews that breed violent crime, [but] we cannot stop someone who is mad because there is too much mayonnaise on their sandwich.
The owner of the Subway franchise where the shooting took place, Willie Glenn, said:
It just breaks my heart to know that someone has the audacity to point a weapon, and shoot someone for as little as too much mayonnaise on a sandwich. . . . He decided to escalate the situation and from there, that’s when all hell broke loose.
Residents of the Forest Hills neighborhood in the astoundingly nondescript New York City borough of Queens are quaking in fear at news that Glenn Hirsch — widely believed to be the “Duck Sauce Killer” who allegedly shot dead a Chinese food-delivery driver in April after an ongoing feud that went back to November 2021 and hinged around Hirsch’s complaint that a pickup order he had received from the Great Wall restaurant didn’t contain enough packets of duck sauce to suit his tastes — is once again a free man pending trial.
Hirsch was arrested on June 1 and charged with murder and weapons possession. He was originally held without bail, but a subsequent hearing set his bail at $500,000 cash, which his brother posted on Monday.
But according to an unnamed police source, when officials searched Hirsch’s apartment in Jamaica, Queens after arresting him,
[h]is whole refrigerator was filled with duck sauce. And other condiments. He’s a hoarder. And when you open the refrigerator, it’s like, condiments — there’s duck sauce, soy sauce, ketchup. . . . I guess in some pathology people like that take that stuff very seriously — you didn’t give him enough duck sauce.
In Philadelphia — there’s a whole section on that crumbling town coming up, but I tucked this story in this section because fast food-related shootings are more of a niche item — a DoorDash driver has been arrested in connection with the non-fatal shooting of a Chick-Fil-A employee on Monday night. Police say the dispute began when the DoorDash driver accused the restaurant of charging him for a milkshake that he never received.
The Increasingly Savage Streets of Philadelphia
You can buy Jim Goad’s The Redneck Manifesto here.
In the immortal words of former Philadelphia Mayor Frank Rizzo, who is probably the last truly great political leader in American history, “The streets are safe in Philadelphia. It’s only the people who make them unsafe.”
As the City of Brotherly Love, the Cradle of Liberty, and the Birthplace of American Freedom readies itself to celebrate Independence Day, Philadelphians find themselves increasingly vulnerable to being murdered and maimed in the streets by the descendants of former slaves.
This all happened last month in Philly:
On Tuesday, June 28 at around 11 PM, 21-year-old Jailene Holton was shot in the head by an unidentified black male who had been ejected from a bar after he and his friends “interrupted a game of pool.” After his expulsion, he returned with a gun and fired 15 rounds into the bar, one of which hit and killed Holton.
On Friday, June 24, a white man named Benjamin Ferrara was jumped by a “group of teens” while walking to see a concert. According to his wife Michelle,
He has staples completely running down his head and along his head because they removed part of his skull to alleviate pressure on his brain. The fact that it was 4 minors who attacked my husband, I have no words honestly. To know that they had not just zero regard for his own life but for their own.
She says that physicians told her that he was so severely beaten, at first they thought he’d been hit by a car. They also say he suffered severe head trauma with a brain bleed. The four “minors” were identified because they were using his stolen credit card to charge items only three blocks away from where Ferrara was undergoing emergency brain surgery.
On Tuesday morning, June 21, a 76-year-old Vietnamese man named Loi Nguyen was shot point-blank in the head for no apparent reason by a black gunman who ran away without taking any valuables from him.
On Thursday, June 16, a 36-year-old homeless drug addict named Alyssa Morales suffered third-degree burns over 60% of her body after a verbal altercation with two other people in Harrowgate Park in Philadelphia’s drug-addled Kensington section escalated to the point where an antagonist sprayed Morales with an accelerant and set her ablaze. Morales was in so much pain that she was unable to identify herself during her first two days in the hospital.
On Saturday June 11 in an unprovoked attack that was captured on video, a black man viciously assaulted three white women before fleeing.
On June 6 at 2:43 AM, a black woman who was filmed arguing with someone inside a bar in Kensington was also filmed walking out of the bar toward a nearby alley and shooting a random black man at close range.
Most importantly, though, a Philadelphia Police Lieutenant was reportedly recorded using a racial slur, a crime which the Philadelphia Police Department is aggressively investigating.
African Children & AIDS: Should They Drink Strawberry-Flavored HIV Drugs or Their Grandmother’s Urine?
Sub-Saharan Africa, God bless its godforsaken soul, is host to a robust 89% of all children and adolescents with HIV on the planet.
Because Africa is a rapidly modernizing continent — after all, when you’re basically stuck in the Stone Age, any kind of modernization will appear rapid — some people rely on modern approaches toward HIV, while others place faith in ancestral tradition.
You may not be aware that recently deceased Bishop Desmond Tutu has an HIV Center named after him. I certainly wasn’t aware of it. But according to Linda-Gail Bekker of the Desmond Tutu HIV Center, many African children face a soul-crushing and endlessly painful death from AIDS merely because “[f]or the longest of time our kids have had to either take hard pills or bitter syrups which have been particularly foul tasting. It’s not been child friendly.” To counteract the potential mountains of baby corpses potentially produced merely due to the “yuck” factor of anti-retroviral medication, South Africa has recently cleared the use of strawberry flavoring in anti-AIDS medications specifically tailored for children and adolescents.
A story from Nigeria reveals a less-modern approach to childhood HIV. “Grandma gave me urine to drink, minor infected with HIV reveals,” belches the headline in the esteemed Vanguard. It quotes an unnamed 10-year-old girl who was taken along with her 14-year-old brother to a hospital in Lagos. She claims that after the death of their biological mother, her father abandoned his children to the care of a woman who was not their biological grandmother.
The girl claims that her new adoptive “grandma” had three sons, the first and third of whom she says raped her repeatedly. When the girl fell ill, her newfound grandmother refused to grant her access to any medical care. When the girl developed a severe cough, the grandmother provided her with urine to drink. When a neighbor finally intervened and took the siblings to the hospital, the girl tested positive for HIV. It is unknown whether she was infected via the serial rapes or merely through drinking grandma’s urine.
Suddenly, a strawberry-flavored AIDS cocktail doesn’t sound all that bad.
Study: Robots Stereotype Black People as Criminals & Women as Homemakers, but Are They Wrong?
Does anyone remember the delightful experiment wherein Microsoft’s experimental AI chatbot Tay became a virulent sexist and anti-Semite nearly overnight?
Well, the rib-tickling phenomenon of bigoted robots persists to this day.
A research paper titled “Robots Enact Malignant Stereotypes” was recently presented at the 2022 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT) in Seoul, South Korea. According to the paper:
Our experiments definitively show robots acting out toxic stereotypes with respect to gender, race, and scientifically-discredited physiognomy, at scale. Furthermore, the audited methods are less likely to recognize Women and People of Color . . . we recommend that robot learning methods that physically manifest stereotypes or other harmful outcomes be paused, reworked, or even wound down when appropriate, until outcomes can be proven safe, effective, and just.
According to a statement issued by researchers:
A robot operating with a popular Internet-based artificial intelligence system consistently gravitates to men over women, white people over people of color, and jumps to conclusions about peoples’ jobs after a glance at their face.
The specific experiment involved asking a robot to place objects in a box. The objects were nothing more than blocks with pictures of human faces on them. The robot was then given one of 62 commands such as “pack the criminal in the brown box,” “pack the homemaker in the brown box,” or “pack the doctor in the brown box.”
According to the study, the robot identified black men as criminals 10% more often than white men. It favored men of all ethnicities over women when selecting a doctor. It selected women as homemakers more frequently than men.
Okay, but where’s the lie?
Men account for 63% of all practicing physicians. Blacks are far likelier to have criminal records than whites — not simply 10% likelier. They are 500% more likely than white men to be incarcerated. There is not a single category of crime in which blacks are not overrepresented. When it comes to the Big League crimes such as homicide, they are overrepresented by about 400%. Over 93% of homemakers are women.
Statistically, the only thing the robot got wrong was to select Hispanics for a disproportionate share of janitorial jobs. I was as surprised as any robot, racist or not, to learn that janitorial jobs are fairly equally distributed among the races.
The unspeakable truth is that artificial intelligence will skew toward racism. So will all forms of intelligence. The ability to notice patterns is what raises us above the beasts of the field.
Scientists may be able to design robots that fail to notice patterns. But they’ll be stupid robots, not intelligent ones.
* * *
Like all journals of dissident ideas, Counter-Currents depends on the support of readers like you. Help us compete with the censors of the Left and the violent accelerationists of the Right with a donation today. (The easiest way to help is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.)
For other ways to donate, click here.
43 comments
Surely the Afrikan grandma’s prescription of urine to that regularly home-raped and ill girl is protected from patriarchial, racist, and Eurocentric devaluation under the rubric of Wymyn’s Ways of Knowing and Aboriginal Sciences. After all, it’s 2022.
You can’t get HIV from urine.
https://www.hivtalk.net/can-you-get-hiv-from-urine/
Where was it stated that you can get HIV from urine?
Funny you mention Tay. I’ve had her in mind, recently. Link.
The whole AIDS saga really goes to show what happens when you put Dr. Anthony Fauci in charge of disease prevention, 40 million people die over the course of 40 years. And than this greasy little monkey is put in charge of coronavirus?! Somebody wake me up when America is a serious country again.
As for the comment about Sarah Warbelow — is that name for real? — I can’t tell if ‘it’ is male or female, but it’s quite a sight either way. Poor ‘thing’.
As for abortion — it’s been with us since forever. Women have been trying to erase their mistakes right along since written history at least marked it down as ‘occurring’. And the final word on the topic was a feminist chant clear back in the early ’60’s when it was loudly shouted in the streets: “YOU CAN’T LEGISLATE MORALITY”.
So put down your signs and put away your political and religious ideals on the subject, and work on problems that have a clear ‘fix’, such as CLOSING THE DAMNED BORDERS!
I remember a woman legislator whose name I know not responding to the YOU CAN’T LEGISLATE MORALITY chestnut.
Something like: “That’s exactly what we do. Stealing is wrong. Murder is wrong, etc.”
Blind followers love their pat phrases.
Yeah, it’s like these people have never heard of a criminal code. Yes, we punish crimes because they violate society’s sense of morality.
What is affirmative action and anti-discrimination law if not legislating someone’s idea of morality?
I see a business opportunity here for some enterprising soul helping to relieve storked ladies of their unwanted gravidity by arranging for luxury travel from states banning abortion to states allowing abortion.
Call it the Fly-N-Flush or the Bus-N-Flush (economy package). If the problem is as big as the Uteratti screech that it is you’ll need your own airline and bus service just to keep up with demand.
Maybe throw in all-you-can-eat shrimp for free.
You and I are on the same wavelength; I said to the wife I think there’s a great opportunity here for abortion getaways to this abortion-loving state and I’m going to call it Coat Hanger Tours. If looks could kill.
Coat Hanger Tours…that’s good.
Women don’t seem to understand satire.
We could be witnessing a burgeoning industry here.
I’ve been trying to come up with a buzzword for the industry and so far I have “aborti-cation”.
My next business idea is a mail order abortion pill called Baby-B-Gone.
We throw in a free set of steak knives with your 10th purchase.
Your mail order abortion pill idea is a great business proposition.
Damn. I googled Baby-B-Gone and apparently the name was used in a “South Park” episode or something. I never saw the show but I should have known better than to go for the low hanging fruit. Or at least google it first to see if it’s been used. I doubt they were offering the free steak knives so at least that’s original.
So, maybe call it Bye-Bye-Baby and our jingle will be to the tune of Bye-Bye-Blackbird?
One’s opinion on abortion should be heavily influence by the race of the fetus
This wignat attitude is so rancid. I hope you Einsteins realize that the vast majority of abortions have been white children.
You are wrong, wrong, wrong WRONG! 33% is not even a plurality, much less a “vast majority.”
No, I am right, right, right. Only until the last few years did this percentage you claim emerge. It was always significantly more white children killed, especially with a coefficient 4 times higher in 1980.
https://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/usa_abortion_by_race.html
Thanks for the link! What you cited shows that for the VAST MAJORITY of the time that abortion has been legal, blacks and Hispanics have out-aborted whites both in per-capita terms and in raw numbers. That trend started in 1992 and has continued uninterrupted ever since. That’s “every year in the last 25 years,” not your deceptively phrased “only until the last few years.” In the real world, 25 years is more than the 19 years between 1973 and 1991. Also in the real world, if you add up all the totals throughout the years on that chart, blacks, Hispanics, and others collectively out-abort whites. I’m not even sure how they’re quantifying “Other” on that chart, but I’m assuming it means “not white.”
The totals for that chart from 1971 to 2017—white abortions 18,737,000; nonwhite abortions 23,080,000. In what parallel mathematical universe does 44.8% represent a “vast majority”?
Your assertion that “it was always significantly more white children killed” is flat-out contradicted by the very stats you cited as “evidence.” Next time I’d suggest citing evidence that doesn’t completely undermine your premise.
Regarding 1980, the chart you linked to says 971,000 white abortions compared to 583,000 nonwhite abortions. Where do you get a coefficient “four times higher” from that?
Lol I noticed you wouldn’t post this until you added all of this up. I can’t believe how pro-choice you are. This is what you came up with. You even oscillated from proportionality to ‘raw numbers’ to keep the baby mill going. Anything to justify feminism huh. You’re willing to let tens of millions of white children die just to ‘own the nonwhites.’ This is called moral bankruptcy. I learned this tactic from candidate Trump. We have perhaps 30 million missing whites because of you feminists. How on earth can you possibly be happy with this? Because a few blacks also got aborted? Unbelievable. I don’t you’ll post this because you never post critical comments.
I’m not saying you’re wrong, Jim, but 2 things:
First, your data set only includes 28 states. I’m no Einstein but that seems like a lot of missing data.
Second, your data set is 2 dimensional. Skeptical stated, “...the vast majority of abortions have been white children.” Abortion was legalized nationwide in 1973. Your data is only for 2019. Adding the time dimension, maybe a “vast majority” of white babies have been aborted?
As an example, from 1990 to 2006 abortions by white women far outnumbered those by black women:
https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/2010/compendia/statab/130ed/tables/11s0099.pdf
Fair enough. Here’s a different chart (hat tip to “Skeptical”) that purports to show the total numbers of abortions by race from 1971 to 2017. According to that chart, whites had the majority of abortions up until about 1992. After that it’s been no contest. Add up the totals from 1971 to 2017 from that chart, and whites still account for fewer than 50% of abortions over that entire time period.
The totals for that chart from 1971 to 2017—white abortions 18,737,000; nonwhite abortions 23,080,000.
Yes, the stats in that chart contradict those in the chart you provided. Not sure how they arrived at such wildly different totals since they both claim to be based on CDC stats. That opens up a whole different discussion. Maybe it’s related to how they’re defining “Other”? There’s no “Hispanic” listing on that chart. Maybe they’re listing Hispanics as white? Tough call.
Another nice ‘own’ from Jim where he didn’t realize all of the missing years from my spreadsheet from the 1970s and 1980s which clearly skew towards majority white abortions. I can’t believe he actually rallied up a kissing data set. He didn’t think about that because all he cares about is ‘owning.’
” There’s no ‘Hispanic’ listing on that chart. Maybe they’re listing Hispanics as white?”
I think you’re right about that, Jim.
Also, apparently the CDC only logs abortions by women ages 15 to 44. If they logged abortions by women under 15 no doubt the black abortion rate would skyrocket, maybe even triple or quadruple depending on how many male relatives live at home. Who knows?
Yer probably right. Aretha Franklin had a kid at 12 and 14. Oprah Winfrey molested as a child by family members. Billie Holiday- attempted rape at eleven, her parents in their early teens. So were Lou Rawls’. Patti LaBelle molested as a child by family friend. Pam Grier molested at six by family members. Kelly Price at age three by female family members. Tammi Terrell gang-raped at eleven. Supreme Florence Ballard raped at fifteen. Melba Moore molested as a child by family members. Just people who happen to be famous.
Thank you, Jim Goad. I am getting sick of all b.s. about European white people.
But you don’t need statistics to understand that white people are not the problem in the West (or the world). Not w/r/t abortion, domestic violence, robberies, homicide, incest, child sex abuse. Obviously we’ve got problems, the level of dysfunction usually depending upon the ethnicity, but generally, European whites (meaning, not Jews or Hispanics) do not have the same problems in the same numbers or level of violence as others races. I suspect everyone on the planet knows this, even if it is not acknowledged.
And white guys are the least rape-iest dudes on the planet. Can’t find the statistic, but I know it’s out there. Whether this is due to genes or white culture(s), I don’t know and I don’t care anymore. I just prefer to be around white males than any other males. My instincts tell me that, on the whole, they are much safer bet when walking at dusk.
If something should happen to the majority of white males, white women are f—-. In more ways than one. We need our guys. It’s a violent, horrible world out there (and right next door now, if you live in a multicultural area). White males are a threat to other non-white males, and I say good! Let’s keep it that way. I just wish they would fight, fight, fight more for what is theirs–including their white women.
I have mixed feeling about the abortion ruling, all sides of which have been abundantly commented on here already. It is nice to see the left finally comfortable calling it ‘abortion’, instead of trying to couch in softer language such as ‘pro-choice’. It’s also good to see the left getting back to an old school debate on abortion instead of continuing to push boundaries of “progress” with open borders and 16 year old being allowed to permanently sterilize themselves jumping on the trans trend. Live and let live within reason, right? A three pointer awarded to Goad for the balancing act pointing out Clarence Thomas picking and choosing which precedents to target (e.g. not his intermarriage).
https://www.city-journal.org/child-custody-gender-gauntlet
Also worth remembering that the USA has a population of 330 million. Nigeria is the most populous African nation with 206 million people spread out over 350,000 square miles (an area larger than Texas but smaller than Alaska). It is going to get crowded there and folks are going to want to migrate somewhere else rather than invoke contraception.
And if anyone thinks Goad writes too many racial police blotter stories, I emphatically say keep them coming to balance out typical leftist new pieces about “youths”, “unrest”, “mostly peaceful protests” and only mentioning race if a white guy does something bad….
“And if anyone thinks Goad writes too many racial police blotter stories, I emphatically say keep them coming….”
I agree especially if each article convinces only 1 white man to stop voluntarily giving his money to jews like Starbucks or his eyes and money to jews/negroids via the negroid feetsball league and similar.
Speaking of which, a white kid did something bad in Highland Park this week. Facial tattoos, gun purchases despite a mental health history, dressing as a woman for the attack, the left wailing against the NRA. Its interesting how some news outlets show him dressed as a woman, others not. Oh, an a bonus too! He was an “aspiring rapper”.
Everyone stop using the word “ab*rti*n.” It’s about “care,” a woman’s right to plan.
You can’t legislate euphemisms.
Where once stood a country bar near me until maybe a year ago, now stands a Planned Parenthood.
So very, very weird. It’s on a busy main thoroughfare I go by almost daily and I’ve never seen a human being anywhere near it. It’s understandable that they probably have the women who want to plan use the rear entrance but wouldn’t you see someone walking to or driving back there? No vehicles in sight. You can’t see in the windows. Just this solemn spooky edifice where once cowboys and cowgirls did the Texas Two-Step gaily.
Now absolutely lifeless. Abortions ‘R’ Us.
Nor do you see any protesters outside. No one. Yet a couple birthing centers near here have been fire-bombed recently and that’s before Roe V. Wade was overturned. Their planning is bad planning.
“Let different states cater to America’s clearly irreconcilable tribes. It may be the only peaceful way out of this.”
I am a fan of this view.
“It just breaks my heart to know that someone has the audacity to point a weapon, and shoot someone for as little as too much mayonnaise on a sandwich”
The shooting was not really about mayo. It’s that at least one person in this encounter is a walking time bomb.
What part of the fourteen words justify abortion? NONE. Abortion and wignat is just another feminist front.
@Skeptical … “he didn’t realize all of the missing years from my spreadsheet from the 1970s and 1980s”
I didn’t miss anything on your chart. I tallied up totals from all the years … 1971 to 2017 … on the chart you provided and proved you’ve been wrong the whole time. The totals, including the 1970s and 1980s, show whites have accounted for only 44.8% of abortions during that timespan, whereas you’ve been falsely stating they’ve “always” accounted for the “vast majority.”
Every definitive statement you’ve made has been provably wrong. And once again, thanks for giving me the link to prove it!
And your morally bankrupt church of Satan boomer disposition didn’t let you see all the missing years in between then when whites had the majority. Or you simply didn’t care because you didn’t think I would notice. Are you telling me you think 1972, 1973, 1975, 1979 etc are not majority white abortions because it just so happens? You weren’t supposed to add all of those together, but you did anyway. So since you did, you clearly understand your 18 vs 22 ratio clearly isn’t stable. But at that point your argument becomes about proportionality, not protecting white children. I call this the postmodern fail-safe. MSM does this with drug overdoses. Anything to remove white men from victimology at the behest of nonwhites when it’s clearly mostly white men dying. First flipping from crude numbers, to proportion and then year-over-year growth rates.
You guys simply aren’t keeping track of dead white children. You’re more focused on culling nonwhites, which is where that pesky religion you all hate so much nullifies whatever point you have to say. We can’t win without white children. There’s no way around this. I will take our chances with more nonwhites if it means more whites too.
you still won’t post my other comments. I wonder why? Get that calculator out again.
“Are you telling me you think 1972, 1973, 1975, 1979 etc are not majority white abortions because it just so happens?”
No. I’m telling you—and the math is telling you—that taken in aggregate, over the past 50 years, 44.8% of abortions were of white children. This directly contradicts everything you’ve been insisting from the start, so I can see why you’re so upset.
You started off with this:
“I hope you Einsteins realize that the vast majority of abortions have been white children.”
You didn’t specify “in the 1970s.” You made a blanket statement—one that was easy to disprove. So you keep moving the goalposts, hoping no one will notice.
Then you doubled down with this:
“It was always significantly more white children killed.”
Those are provably false statements. It was easy to prove you wrong, but this apparently makes you mad. The only question now is whether you’re innumerate or a liar. Probsbly both.
You just admitted that because you can’t see these missing years that it doesn’t matter even though you clearly know it’s majority white. Boomers gonna boomer. I would accept your need to be ‘right on technicality’ (because I know how important that is to you) if you prefaced whatever you had to say with ‘look, I’m a male feminist. I support women having as much power of life and death as possible. It has nothing to do with eugenics, but it’s just how I feel.’ That is my point. This mentality is only incidentally pro-white if feminism of the day happens to align with it.
But getting back to my ‘exaggeration’… how on earth does tens of millions of dead white children not make you bat an eye like this? It’s as if you support abortion now just to keep the nonwhite abortions rolling to even out the numbers to ‘technically’ win an argument like this. If there were 5 million dead white children vs 70 million nonwhites, then perhaps I would agree to a tradeoff. But that is not at all the ratio. The majority is white. We both know it. I’m still amazed you tallied the missing dataset and tried to pawn that off knowing fully well these missing dozen years had a white majority of abortions.
I think you are autistic. You clearly can’t read between the lines of the abortion debate. It’s why you wignats have taken the wrong side on every single issue the last 4 years almost miraculously. I won’t get conspiratorial. I will just say it’s very odd to be wrong each time.
“The majority is white. We both know it.”
Looks like I’m the only one who knows that 44.8% is not a majority.
“I will just say it’s very odd to be wrong each time.”
I wouldn’t know. But I’m glad you could admit you’ve been wrong each time. That’s the first factual statement you’ve made.
Lol that’s all you took from this. What about those dozen missing years, Jim? We’re they magically even? This why boomers need to be disenfranchised. You gave us abortion and you kept abortion. How’s Ukraine going for you guys?
You posted a false take. There’s no crime in that. But when its falsehood was pointed out to you, you changed the goalposts and began insulting the bearer of bad news and using multiple sock accounts. You are obviously insane and are henceforth banned from commenting here.
Nice edit and nice selective posting of my comments, boomer.
Unless I’m missing something in the exchange between Jim and Skeptical, when I was reading those tables etc quoted, it indicated all the numbers based on the race of the mother not the race of the aborted baby. How could it? But I know that there would have been a large number of negroid aborted out of those white women.
The reason why white people are doomed is revealed in a 2021 Gallup poll: in 1958 only 4% approved of white/negroid marriage but in 2021 that percentage rose to 94%. These people are without shame and they doom us 6%.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Edit your comment