Counter-Currents
1,466 words
It’s remarkable, astounding, depressing, confounding, perplexing, and infuriating to behold the lengths to which Wikipedia will go to deny black Americans the overdue credit for something at which they truly excel — namely, crime.
Since it’s undeniable that we live in patriarchy, one never hears an endless litany of excuses and alibis for why men commit more crime than women. Just as it’s understood that horses are better at long-distance running than squirrels, it’s taken as an article of faith that men are simply fantastic at crime in ways that women could never hope to match.
But since we live in what science has proved to be a white-supremacist society, the closet Klansmen over at Wikipedia fairly tie their own testicles in knots in their fumbling attempts to reason away black overachievement in crime rather than simply using Occam’s Razor to cut to the quick by acknowledging, “Despite all the roadblocks that our society places on the pathway to success in an attempt to impede black excellence, blacks have kept their eyes on the prize and continue to shame all other racial groups in the per-capita commission of crime.”
In the first paragraph of Wikipedia’s guide to “Race and crime in the United States,” the editors are forced to acknowledge that “Crime rates vary significantly between racial groups.”
Okay, that seems as if we’re off to a good start. But then they go and obscure the obvious in the very next sentence by adding, “Most homicide victims in the United States are of the same race as the perpetrator.”
While that’s technically true, it’s not nearly as statistically impressive as the statement, “Most homicide perpetrators in the United States are of the black race.” But that sentence is nowhere to be found in Wikipedia’s article, suggesting a heavy anti-black bias.
Rather than simply conceding that black excellence in crime is due to, well, black excellence in crime, Wikipedia tries to explain it away with excuses such as poverty, public education, exposure to harmful chemicals, and housing segregation.
They even trot out dubious and unverifiable hypotheses such as “conflict theory, strain theory, general strain theory, social disorganization theory, macrostructural opportunity theory, social control theory, and subcultural theory” in their desperate clawing to avoid awarding black males the criminological equivalent of the Stanley Cup.
Instead, they look away as if the FBI Uniform Crime Reports were the sun and that you’d go blind from staring at them for more than five seconds in favor of citing a lone study from North Carolina that claimed “contraband is found at higher rates in whites who are stopped” by police.
You can buy Jim Goad’s Whiteness: The Original Sin here.
Not once are things such as an overabundance of testosterone and a lack of IQ presented as possible causative factors in black crime.
They also repeatedly cite “racial discrimination” in a dishonest and frankly dastardly attempt to avert your attention from the fact that until very recently, “discriminate” was synonymous with “differentiate” and had nothing to do with “unfairly treating a certain group of people who wind up excelling at crime despite your all your efforts to suppress their obvious superiority in this area.”
In a bygone era, “discriminate” merely meant the act of telling the difference between things. So after taking a discriminating look at American crime stats, I can state without any diminution of my ego as a white man that when it comes to crime, I am an unabashed black supremacist.
Wikipedia’s white-supremacist editors even go so far as to deny blacks their nonpareil ability to kill other blacks:
The term “black-on-black” violence has been criticized for being misleading and racially charged. One columnist writing in the wake of the murder of George Floyd has accused opponents of the Black Lives Matter movement of using “blacks killing blacks” rhetoric to avoid discussions about police brutality.
Ay yi yi, how does a sincere anti-racist activist such as myself unpack this?
According to one tally, police killed a grand total of 14 unarmed blacks in America in the year 2019. According to another tally, 7,484 blacks were murdered during the same year. Seeing as how annual reports consistently show that over 90% of black murder victims are killed by other blacks, at least 6,735 blacks gave up the ghost at the hands of their co-blacks in the year 2019.
That means that for every unarmed black killed by police — both white and black — in 2019, at least 481 blacks were slain by their brothers in negritude.
Could it be, then, that this “police brutality” rhetoric is used to avoid discussions about black-on-black violence? Sure as shootin’ seems so, sheriff.
The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) are flawed in several ways. One is that they are based on data provided by undeniably bigoted and anti-negro police officials across the nation. The other is that they focus only on arrests rather than actual crimes committed. This proves that all the “official stats” we see are filtered like tainted coffee through white-supremacist kidneys. Then again, the National Crime Victimization Survey — which uses crime victims’ own descriptions of their perpetrators, and crime victims usually are motivated to accurately describe their assailants in the service of facilitating their eventual capture — closely coincide with the FBI’s stats regarding black overperformance in crime, so ignore everything I previously said in this paragraph.
Alas, the 2020 FBI UCR stats won’t be released for another couple of months. Being the equivalent of a premature ejaculator when it comes to perusing black crime stats, I couldn’t wait until September, so like an earnest youth in the 1950s scanning a yellowed and dog-eared copy of Playboy rather than waiting for the new issue, I must satisfy myself with the 2019 FBI stats.
Those 2019 numbers, despite Wikipedia’s mendacious efforts to deny black Americans their place in the sun regarding criminal prowess, prove what I’ve been trying to say in blacks’ defense throughout this article — they are as good at crime as they are at basketball.
Table 43A of the 2019 FBI Uniform Crime reports counts total arrests by race and ethnicity. And since the US Census shows that blacks comprised 13.4% of the American population in 2019, the FBI proves — undoubtedly to the consternation, befuddlement, and chagrin of the info-Nazis over at Wikipedia — that there is not a single category of crime in which blacks do not exceed their quotient of the populace.
In only three categories — all of them involving alcohol — do blacks barely eclipse their percentage of the public. When it comes to violating liquor laws (15.5%), drunkenness (14.8%), and driving under the influence (14.1%), our ex-Africans may require government assistance in getting their numbers higher. Then again, statistics show that whites are more prone to alcoholism than blacks and that blacks are less likely than whites to own a car.
But in nearly every other category of crime — including “white collar” crimes such as embezzlement and fraud — blacks perform at a clip twice as high, and often much higher, than their percentage of the population. I was a bit surprised, and frankly a tad disappointed, to see their quotient of rape arrests clocking in at a piddling 26.7%, but Wikipedia says that black women are the least likely to report rape unless it’s by a stranger. This leads me to assume that black women impede public knowledge of black crime excellence by their reluctance to call the police after black men rape them — either that, or they clearly enjoy it.
In 2019, black suspects accounted for 51.2% of total arrests for murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, proving as they do every year that when it comes to killing, they are Jesse Owens-level Olympians. Even more impressively, they even one-upped their murder stats by comprising 52.7% of all arrestees for robbery.
One troubling aspect of the FBI Uniform Crime Reports for 2019 that almost escaped my notice and that seems to entirely escape public scrutiny is the fact that Asians, just as they do in testosterone, stand at the other end of the crime spectrum compared to blacks. Clocking in at just under 6% of the population in 2019, Asians only exceeded this quotient in two areas of crime — gambling (11.3%) and prostitution and commercialized vice (6.1%). In every other category of crime, Asians barely exceeded 2% of those arrested.
Based on these alarming statistics, the only conclusion I can draw is that both the FBI and the editors of Wikipedia hate Asians.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
25 comments
Crime stats are misleading as long as Arabs and Hispanics are counted as “white,” which they so often are.
Also, I have never seen racial data on “stranger v stranger” murder. Most murders happen between people known to each other. I wonder what the ratio is of whites killing black strangers, verses blacks killing white strangers. I’d eat my shoe if it were less than 30-1
I for one approve of the self cleaning oven Jim. SCO. Long may these demons annihilate each other, just as long as we can minimize the damage to our own I am not seeing the downside. Not as good as deportation and repatriation but its the optimal situation right now.
I agree in spirit, but the black on black murder rate doesn’t appear to approach, let alone exceed, the birth rate. That needs to change.
It’s a tough one. It should be killing off their dumbest and most violent every generation though. Like hanging back in the Medieval period was eugenic.
This makes me think of the red queen and her ever accelerating treadmill. It will never catch up
Very wise observation, with which I agree. When I hear the weekly horror reports of the last weekend in Chicago, I can only say “Oh, well.”
I’m not good at higher math or anything—I failed out of all that stuff, actually—but something the absolute numerical statistics belie is that all the black on white murders take place in the small border zones between black and white areas like between Detroit and its suburbs. The country is mostly still white, and the white on white murder rate is just a notch higher than the black on white rate, but that white on white rate encompasses the killings that occur between all whites interacting everywhere in the US. The black on white murders are taking place in very narrow geographic confines of black white interaction, say a fifty mile penumbra about the inner cities. It’s not as though ghetto blacks are flying out to rural Oregon on honkey shoots, lol!
So the numeric statistics belie just how dangerous blacks can be. Fewer people are killed by grizzly bears every year than lightening strike, but all those killings happen in rural Montana, so if you are capering through Yellowstone, grizzly bear attack is a real danger. Here in the southeast, not so much.
Almost all firearm involved homicides appear to be clustered in urban areas without supermarkets. So that’s the Krajina between Whites and Blacks defined right there. It is safest to live with 1/4 mile of a functioning supermarket.
How did Wikipedia find out that black women are the least likely to report rape?
The only rational explanation is that Wikipedia’s editors were basing their judgment on personal experience.
Empiricism! More poison fruit from the Enlightenment!
Paraphrasing the words of Carl Benjamin de Swindon AKA Sargon of Akkad “white men can’t even be bothered to rape black women!” the racists.
Or they’re assuming black women are being raped because they live among black men?
https://youtu.be/XjpkoPEn0cI
In the novel Live and Let Live, Bond and M have a little chin-wag about why Africans are “due” to take their place among the world’s super villains, (“We’re all equal, after all, 007” or something like that) and how the novel’s Mr Big is especially dangerous because he’s been trained by Moscow.
You mean Live And Let Die.
“…an overabundance of testosterone…”
This is a meme that needs to die. Not sure why it’s even still popular since it has been debunked quite a while ago. Blacks are more prone to violent “hissy fits” because of their higher estrogen levels.
“Serum estrogen, but not testosterone, levels differ between black and white men in a nationally representative sample of Americans”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17456570/
Pretty sure I know who this is, and I’m pretty sure you’re skipping over all these links that I’ve already sent you, ya hotheaded Canuck:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40615-014-0049-8
“Further analyses showed that black males had considerably higher levels of testosterone compared to white males aged 20–39 years after adjusting for covariates, including age, body mass index, cigarette smoking, physical activity, and waist circumference; however, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups at any other age.”
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13685530903071802
“In the age range 20–69 years, black men average 0.39 ng/ml higher testosterone than white and MA men (p < 0.001). The higher testosterone in black men is partly explained by low marriage rate and low adiposity.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327897/
“After age adjustment, free testosterone levels were significantly higher in black than in white men (WMD = 4.07 pg/mL, 95% CI 1.26, 6.88). Depending on the free testosterone concentration in white men, this WMD translates into a racial difference ranging from 2.5 to 4.9%. Total testosterone (WMD = 0.10 ng/mL, 95% CI −0.02, 0.22), estradiol (WMD = 0.67 pg/mL, 95% CI −0.04, 1.38) and SHBG (WMD = −0.45 nmol/L, 95% CI −1.75, 0.85) concentrations did not differ comparing blacks with whites. After adjustment for age, black men have a modestly but significantly 2.5 to 4.9% higher free testosterone level than white men. ”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0039128X92900325
“Based on geometric means, significant average differences were found between 3,654 non-Hispanic white and 525 black individuals.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3455741/
“Mean testosterone levels in blacks were 19% higher than in whites, and free testosterone levels were 21% higher. Both these differences were statistically significant. Adjustment by analysis of covariance for time of sampling, age, weight, alcohol use, cigarette smoking, and use of prescription drugs somewhat reduced the differences. After these adjustments were made, blacks had a 15% higher testosterone level and a 13% higher free testosterone level. A 15% difference in circulating testosterone levels could readily explain a twofold difference in prostate cancer risk.”
https://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/cebp/11/10/1041.full.pdf
“Serum testosterone concentration appears to be higher in black men than white men, particularly at younger ages.”
Whenever I hear black excellence, I always crack up. Recently, I’ve seen it brought up a lot on social media… blacks asking their white followers, “What does black excellence mean to you?” Gee, I don’t know La’quanda, let’s also ask your baby daddy when he gets out of prison for grand theft auto.
I’ve been thinking that we need some kind of counter to this weird black excellence fetish/psyop that has been popular recently. Something subtle that will sit on the subconscious. Maybe we should be asking whites, “What is your favorite modern invention of the last 150 years?” and follow up with, “Do you know who invented it?” Odds are heavy that a white man created it. I’m just spitballing here, but it is super easy to find an abundance of real world white excellence versus fairytale black excellence. Unless, as Mr. Goad puts it, we’re talking crime and b-ball.
Great article Jim, appreciate the blend of wit and statistics.
Any ghetto cop will tell you that the most distinctive feature of ghetto African Americans is not stupidity but criminality. Indeed, the very essence of life of many of the men ages 20-50 is criminality. Many of them seem to be quite smart in doing harm to others but stupid in doing anything constructive. The black with an improvised flame thrower in Charlottesville is a good example. He couldn’t have a reasonable discussion with you, but he could burn off your face’s skin. Hey, if they want the black men to pay attention in college, maybe they can use pretend crime scenarios as teaching tools. It would be like a combination of Sesame Street and Gangsta Rap. Forget about African Studies. Allowing them to major in Thug Studies may help narrow the achievement gap.
The safest place to live in a large city is within an Asian suburb, and in L.A., there are several, though Downtown L.A. Chinatown is getting invaded by the ruffians. I found out this secret when a friend of mine inherited a rental property in a secluded Asian enclave near a Buddhist temple in ‘Avocado Heights’, a former Spanish (i.e. Mexican) farming community. There is zero to steal in these neighborhoods of medium-sized Italianate semi-mansions, filled with nothing but faux French Baroque furniture, and our place filled with books. Surround yourselves with Asians, and forget about crime. Not even a Tesla has been stolen as far as I can see. And there’s a major supermarket 1/4 mile away, and no Nike shops.
In my mind a succesful criminal is one who:
Makes a good to very good living from crime
Evades detection or capture
Is very good at what he does and has a back up plan or two.
All of this involves organisation, planning, and networks of fences, money launderers, and lawyers. Think of hit men, jewel and art thieves, high level prostitution rings, and narcotraffico. Most Negroes cannot perform any of these functions, so we can only say they’re the ‘Kings of Senseless Violence’.
Yes, I tip my hat to the Nigerian scammers who have raked in millions—but this would not have been possible without the Jewish training of radical racial egalitarianism and the general dumbing down of the West.
I’m pretty sure the “improvised flame thrower” was a can of hairspray and a lighter, and an example of “the right exaggerating just as the left
Yeah I looked. Hairspray and a lighter
Blacks do not excel at crime, they just commit a lot of it.
Quick story. In seventh grade, 1964, I was hit up in the bathroom by three black kids for my lunch money. I stood up to them and they left me along but I was pretty frightened for a bit. We’re 10+/- years old. Who taught them to do this?
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment