Muslim terrorist/murderer Omar el-Hussein
904 words
Another day, another violent terror attack on our native soil of Europe by your friendly neighborhood NECs [non-European Caucasians]. No worries though, it’s all covered and controlled by our masters in the usual manner.
For example, the American mass media refers to the killer as a “native son” of Denmark, as if he were a Nordic Scandinavian, a Viking berserker, or perhaps a brooding introspective Hamlet, rather than a Levantine Semitic Arab, who, of course, hadn’t the slightest business living in Denmark to begin with. Reports indicate a specifically Palestinian ancestry which, if true, would further explain his radicalization, with Israeli treatment of that ethny contributing to much anger in the Islamic world.
Indeed, the role of Jews in the ongoing low grade civil war in Europe is quite interesting, apart from the usual tinfoil hat conspiracy theories that I will not dwell on here. On the one hand, Israeli dispossession of the Palestinians, and the West’s (particularly, America’s) reflexive support of Jewish behavior, enrages Muslims the world over. Then, the Jews strongly support immigration of Muslims into Western nations, as part of the grand objective of diluting the racial and cultural patrimony of the European peoples. Further, Jews also strongly support “hate speech laws” which criminalize native European objections to their genocidal race replacement. But, alas, a few Jews suffer some “blow back” from Islamic immigration, as the newcomers do not show appreciation toward the Jews who have helped unlock the gates of Europe to the alien invasion. And this, you see, is a big problem. The Western leadership accepts — nay, advocates! — the demographic and civilizational eclipse of Europeans by immigrants, they cover up immigrant crimes up to and including the mass rape of native children, they look the other way when ordinary Whites live lives of quiet desperation over the loss of their neighborhoods, cities, and nations, but — but! — let one Jew come to harm, let Israelis call for a Jewish exodus from Europe, and the leaders of the West collapse into paroxysms of agony and anguish.
Indeed, the idea of a large scale migration of Jews out of Europe, the possibility of which should be met with universal joy and ringing celebration, is instead treated with horror by the same elites who shrug off Rotherham with cheerful insouciance.
And as far as the immigrant invaders themselves? I’ve written here a number of times, that the Western, the European reaction to these events, to these massacres, would be to call for more immigration, a greater alien flood, more race replacement, more speech laws. To those who would label me unduly pessimistic, I refer you to this.
But are the White masses any better? Let us not underestimate the weakness, stupidity, masochism, and cowardice of the White race. You’d think that after Rotherham, Charlie Hebdo, and now this, you’d think that there’d be some sort of reaction, some sort of sign of puissance, some expression of outrage. But, no. Nothing. Now, let me make a disclaimer. Of course — of course! — I advocate for legal and peaceful activism to promote European survival, and let there be no doubt — none whatsoever! — that I unequivocally denounce and reject any violent responses. That said, one can consider what a healthy people would have done in response to these outrages (never mind that a healthy people would not have allowed any of this to occur in the first place, but never mind that for now).
With the exposure of Rotherham, what would have been a normal reaction of a sane people? One could envision mobs of outraged Englishmen, their breasts burning with anger — a rage building for years, for decades — crashing into the prisons, dragging out the accused, and lynching them. Then, the mob, just getting warmed up, would find those officials of their own race who turned a blind eye to the years of outrages against English children, they would find those officials and string them up as well. And, just like the storming of the Bastille, these actions would precipitate a nation-wide revolution, and the streets of London would run red with blood (amazing enough, this time NOT the blood of Englishmen slaughtered by immigrants). And about the “refugees” that Europe must joyfully accept? Those boats in the Mediterranean? Torpedo them. Or, if advanced naval armaments are considered too valuable to waste on such vermin, then just let them die at sea and, if they try to land on European soil, open up with the machine guns, bullets being somewhat cheaper than torpedoes. And for those aliens living in Europe, regardless of citizenship or place of birth: give them a defined time frame to get up and leave, to go back to their homelands, or suffer a less pleasant fate. That’s what normal and healthy people would do. But, I repeat: I do not advocate that. Let us be humane. Let us use the political process. But do Whites do even that? Are White flocking to the polls to vote in real leadership? In Greece, a pro-immigration far-left party has come to power, with the support of the alleged “far-right” Marine Le Pen of France.
We live in an age of madness. And the way things are going, the West will die in an age of madness as well. Don’t say we never told you so. We did. But you all just are not listening.
Source: http://eginotes.blogspot.com/2015/02/a-danish-native-son.html
8 comments
Note, the non-Jewish Dane who was killed, in brief.
_______________________
Finn Noergaard, 55, was struck in the chest by a bullet at the free speech debate. The documentary film-maker had a keen interest in the problems faced by the offspring of migrant communities. His friend Malene Trock told Berlinske daily he was “open-minded” and “cosmopolitan”. [BBC]
____________________
Finn Noergaard was hoisted by his own petard, how ironic. I love it when it’s the so called “open minded” and “cosmopolitan” ones who suffer at the hands of enrichment and diversity.
One or two fathers in Rotherham tried to fight back and were arrested by the British authorities. I hope the West is destroyed in a nuclear war by China or Russia if the sole alternative to this outcome is victory for Jews and the West in its current form.
Nice article. The bit at the end where you call for peaceful reform but note what a sane people would do calls to mind a mind a certain speech by Mark Antony from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar…
I believe that Western man is inhibited in his response to his enemies largely because he is at war with himself. Once the rift within is overcome the one without will be as well.
With the exposure of Rotherham, what would have been a normal reaction of a sane people? One could envision mobs of outraged Englishmen, their breasts burning with anger — a rage building for years, for decades — crashing into the prisons, dragging out the accused, and lynching them. Then, the mob, just getting warmed up, would find those officials of their own race who turned a blind eye to the years of outrages against English children, they would find those officials and string them up as well.
And then perhaps marching against those who created and pushed ideologies such as “multiculturalism” and “diversity…”
As for the boatloads of “refugees” crossing the Med: this does bring up a real dilemma. How do you deal with invaders whose weapon is their very helplessness? I’d state that use of armed force is just as justifiable against them as it would be against an armed invader. More so, really, since the “refugees” are going to ultimately destroy the European peoples. And if NATO armies are not going to open fire, then what is the point of NATO countries maintaining all sorts of expensive weaponry? Jean Raspail suggests something like this in “Camp of the Saints” when he has a South African state that violence is the ultimate weapon of the outnumbered white minority against the third/fourth world majority.
Bloodthirsty? Perhaps, but then again white countries are facing an existential crisis. And perhaps the psychological shock of white people fighting for their existence would shatter the delusions of multicultic ideology, as well as serving as an abject lesson to third world invaders.
Because ultimately, it is going to have to be about white peoples retaking control of their own countries–and destinies.
I agree. If the refugees are just floating around in the middle of the Mediterranean, just leave them there to die of natural causes. If they enter European territorial waters, use military force to repel them. But, above all, do not “rescue” them, this is madness. I think a brief and firm repulsion would dissuade further incursions. However, the more they are “rescued” and given official refugee status, the more will come. This is a failure of nerve, which is well described in Raspail’s book. If I remember, the French gov’t did a test in that story, sent a destroyer (or whatever) to intercept the “Last Chance Armada” to see if the White sailors were capable of using force to repel the invasion. They were not capable, and so Europe died. The same thing is occurring now, in slow motion.
We might ask why white leaders were willing to give orders to firebomb Hamburg, Dresden and Tokyo, attacking civilians with all sorts of horrors–yet are unwilling to shoot up some boats today carrying invaders from Africa. Let’s note the devastation caused by third world immigrants is akin to something out of a barbarian horde: burned and looted neighborhoods, criminal violence all out of proportion to their numbers, No Go zones like warlord staked-out territories, and the sexual subjugation of white children. Not to mention the “tribute” which Europeans pay to the invaders in the form of welfare transfers and criminalizing the critics of non-whites.
You have to wonder what all those untold billions of Euros spent on NATO weapons and military technology are for. Certainly, they have done little to nothing to defend the European peoples. Not that the situation in the United States is any better…
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.