Counter-Currents
1,516 words
If you don’t want rats in your house, you make your house unlivable for rats, perhaps by buying a cat. If you don’t want cockroaches, you likewise make your house unlivable for those unlovable critters too. I recommend scrupulous cleanliness and the occasional use of poisons.
So, what do you do if you don’t want to live (and die) cheek-by-bloody-jowl with Islamist nut jobs, like the Kouachi brothers, the gunmen who attacked the offices of Charlie Hebdo, and their various cohorts? The answer is simple: you make it unlivable for such scum.
That much can be understood by everybody, but the next question is how to achieve this panacea of common sense.
Some hotheads would advocate a massive séance to raise the ghost of Charles Martel, and a literal driving of all Muslims into the sea – a version of Camp of the Saints in reverse.
Yes, that sounds good a few hours after the most recent outrage perpetuated by the followers of “The Religion of Peace” ™, but that’s not going to happen, at least not yet. There are too many vested interests, too much face to lose by the establishment doing a 180-degree turn, not to mention the immediate economic fallout – soured relations with Middle East, the costs of deportations, etc., etc.
The general populace also have not steeled their hearts for that much harshness and occasional brutality. Many of them will probably know reasonably nice and normal people of Islamic backgrounds, and there will be millions of sob stories just waiting to happen.
But unless some solution is found, the problem will only grow, so a solution will eventually be found several atrocities down the line. So, what will it look like and will it work?
The main problem as far as the elites are concerned is not the racial nature of Muslims but the militant nature of Islam, which, at least in contact with other cultures has played a galvanizing and inflaming role. They are of course wrong. Race remains very important, but this is a realization that for them is perched right on the edge of the precipice of White survival.
For these blinkered elites, their main hope still lies in what I have called elsewhere “cultural genocide,” the hope that Islam can be what Christianity now is, a minor distraction, a bit of cultural fluff. Their ideal is apparently someone like Lassana Bathily, the immigrant from Mali, who is now being hailed as the “hero” of the kosher supermarket siege in Paris that occurred in support of the Charlie Hebdo attacks.
A heroic young Muslim hid Jewish hostages in a freezer as they sought refuge from a killer during a siege at a Kosher supermarket.
Lassana Bathily, originally from Mali in west Africa, is said to have shepherded terrified customers to safety in a chiller as the Islamist gunman took hold of the Hyper Cacher supermarket in Porte de Vincennes, Paris, yesterday.
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/heroic-muslim-man-saved-jewish-hostages-during-paris-siege-by-hiding-them-in-chiller-9970051.html
If all Muslims could be like Bathily, a docile-seeming soul, happy to fill a low-paid service sector job for his social superiors, and oblivious of any sense of Islamic solidarity, then the great scheme of the multiculturalization of Europe would perhaps be back on track. But with Islamic militancy rising in symbiosis with the long-repressed, but now accelerating anti-Islamic tendencies of native Europeans, how can Bathily-style multiculturalism edge out the Islamic nascent mono-culturalism of the Kouachi brothers that demands the conquest of the West?
There seems only one route that our elites can ultimately follow that retains an all-important token believe in “tolerance,” “diversity,” and “multiculturalism,” while also satisfying the growing anger and outrage of Europeans, this is the Chinese solution to the problem of disruptive religion.
When the Communists took over Russia in the 1917, some attempts were made to simply abolish religion and impose atheism, but it was soon realized that such steps would be costly. Later Russian orthodoxy was among the many elements of traditional culture that Soviet Russia mobilized in the service of the war effort against Nazi Germany. In China, following the Communist victory against the Kuomintang in the 1940s, the Chinese Communist Party did not outlaw religion or seek to abolish it, but instead decided to manage or neuter it.
They were particularly concerned about Christianity, both because of its connections with the leadership of the previous regime – key nationalists like Sun Yat-sen (Congregationalist) and Chiang Kai-shek (Methodist) were Christian – and because it was used as a means of subverting Chinese culture and identity by foreign powers.
Accordingly, Christianity and three other religions – Buddhism, Taoism, and Islam – were reorganized and placed under the supervision of the State Administration for Religious Affairs, a bureau charged with harmonizing these religions and their followers with the interests of the state. As Christianity was divided into Protestant and Catholic branches, officially five “religions” were recognized.
Even with the exclusion of Westerners from China following the revolution, Christianity continued to be viewed as inherently dangerous to Chinese sovereignty. This was due to its high degree of organization and universalism. This fear was reflected in the names given by the State Administration for Religious Affairs to the two bodies under which Protestantism and Catholicism were reconstituted. While the organizations overseeing Buddhism, Taoism, and Islam were simply termed the Buddhist Association of China (中国佛教协会), the Chinese Taoist Association (中国道教协会), and the Islamic Association of China (中国伊斯兰教协会), the two Christian organizations had the word “patriotic” pointedly added to their titles. Protestantism was organized as the Three-Self Patriotic Movement (三自爱国运动) and the Catholic Church became the Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association (中国天主教爱国会).
All worship was conducted through state-approved churches, where patriotic values and respect for the “socialist motherland” were instilled side-by-side with the love of Jesus. The Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association also denied the primacy of the Roman Pontiff as this conflicted with the notion of Chinese sovereignty.
More recently, China has allowed greater religious freedom, and there has been a massive growth in other religions, including evangelical Protestantism. The Chinese government, however, remains keenly aware of the threat this poses to national identity and sovereignty and has recently been addressing this:
China will redouble its efforts to nationalize Christianity, a senior Chinese official announced on last Thursday. “The construction of Chinese Christian theology should adapt to China’s national condition and integrate with Chinese culture,” Wang Zuoan, director of the State Administration for Religious Affairs, said at a Shanghai forum on the “Sinicization of Christianity,” according to Chinese state media. Gu Mengfei, deputy secretary-general of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement — a state-sanctioned umbrella organization for Protestant churches — elaborated on the initiative. “This will encourage more believers to make contributions to the country’s harmonious social progress, cultural prosperity and economic development,” Gu said. http://thediplomat.com/2014/08/why-is-china-nationalizing-christianity/
The relevance that this has with the solution in Europe should be obvious. With tens of millions of Muslims now living in Europe, forcibly uprooting and deporting them will be difficult to say the least, especially with our present societies, which combine the profession of Liberal values with soft totalitarian tendencies. Modern multicultural Europe, in fact, faces very similar challenges to Communist China, with its ethnic and religious minorities ever poised to take the flame of faith or nationalism.
What then would be more natural than for our elites in Europe to finally attempt something analogous to what has been done in China, but with particular emphasis on Islam, which is, of course, a far greater threat to Europe than Christianity is to China?
This could be done by nationalizing Islam in some way and bowdlerizing it, forcing each mosque to teach “European values” side by side with the more anodyne elements of the Islamic faith. These “European values” could include those values that the liberal part of our society find particularly attractive, such as gender equality, homosexualism, non-violence, tolerance, animal rights (anti-halal), and a respect for atheistic science. Other key European values that might be promoted could also include traditional monogamy.
The key point about all these values is that they are especially antithetical to Islam, and by diluting and polluting Islam in this way, our elites would have a convenient device both for reigning in Islam and appeasing discontent. Such moves would smoke out the main Islamic hotheads, who could then be arrested, deported, or, assuming the worst, shot in bloody stand offs, but they would also encourage those Muslims most resilient to the agenda of “cultural genocide” to remigrate back to Muslim lands. For them following a gelded caricature of their faith would be a lot harder to accept than it is for Christians to do likewise. This could then be spun to indigenous Europeans as closing the floodgates of immigration and promoting assimilation.
The main benefit of this approach, as far as our elites are concerned, is that it would give Europeans yet another mechanism of denial about their true identity, while leaving them safe in their deluded moral assurance that they were wise and tolerant individuals open to all the cultures of the World.
Would it work is, of course, another question.
14 comments
The former French President Sarkozy tried something like this, he called ‘Islam de France’. It didn’t worked, there is a high degree of hostility between native French and the Arab/Black invaders.
The Chinese Muslims are Turks from the Tarim Base in Northeast China, this region in Antiquity was occupied by White Indo-European Tocharians, was probably them who introduced Buddhism in China.
Chinese Civillization escaped from being conquered by the Abrahamic religions but they got conquered by Marxism who was created and promoted by our Kosher friends: http://blogs.forward.com/the-arty-semite/159051/a-jew-in-maos-china/
The recent Jihadi atrocity in Paris in which Charlie Hebdos staff were murdered in cold blood demonstrates very clearly that Europe, whether it likes to admit it or not, is about to enter a period of protracted violent conflict which will probably progress into civil war. The coming conflict may see the emerging and increasingly confident forces of Islam, aligned with the traitorous forces of the extreme left, pitted against a weak and traitorous liberal elite which would undoubtedly cravenly submit to the Sharia imposing barbarians that are now well established ‘fifth columnists’ throughout all of Europe. The collapse of European civilisation may now be only a few short decades away and the future that European children may inherit would be unlike that of previous generations. If there is any consolation here it is only in the fact the traitorous people responsible for all this will be the first to lose their heads and I for one will take great delight in this.
Drastic situations often require drastic measures and unless we act soon it will be too late to save Europe from its impending Islamisation.. It is, therefore, imperative that all Muslim immigration is stopped immediately; no more Muslims in Europe! Continued Muslim immigration means an increasingly rapid Muslim demographic and with their higher birth-rates the continued rapid pace of Islamisation will continue. This will inevitably create more Muslim ghettos and increasing levels of segregation. Within these segregated ghettos aspects of Sharia law will be implemented and increasing numbers of young Muslims will become radicalised. Perceptions of grievance and a growing hostility against the host society will lead to more violent attacks against the native populations of Europe. The Jihadis are confident that they will capture Europe and impose Sharia on its populations; they know the political classes of Europe are weak and ready to bow to Allah; we must not, therefore, allow their numbers to increase through further immigration. The ultimate priority is the safety and security of our people; nothing else matters.
Preventing further Muslim immigration however is not enough; significant numbers of Muslims should be repatriated to their ancestral homelands as their birth-rates are, in themselves, sufficient to increase the Muslim population to dangerous levels which threaten the peace and security of the native populations of Europe. These Muslims must also be repatriated because Islam is incompatible with Western Civilisation; Islam is culturally incompatible with the cultures of Europe and represents a blot on our European cultural landscape.
A process of de-Islamisation in Europe must coincide with mass repatriation. All Mosque construction must be halted and all funding of Islamic cultural centres stopped. No tax payer’s money must be spent on any Islamic organisations as this is a form of Jyzia and our people are not Dhimmis. Muslims must not hold any positions of authority in any European governments and certainly not in any security related departments; these positions should only be for European people. All politically correct organisations that promote Islam must have their funding stopped. All halal slaughter must cease immediately and under no circumstances must our children be fed halal in schools. We are not barbarians! The teaching of Islam in our schools must cease immediately. Our children and young people must not be subjected to Cultural Marxist indoctrination about Islam; it is not a religion of peace it is a vile death cult with a long and bloody history. We must not allow our children to be lied to. The process of mass repatriation along with the de-Islamisation of Europe is the only way to preserve European civilisation and prevent white genocide.
Once the Muslim problem has been solved we must then turn our attention to the ‘liberal elites’ who have imposed this multicultural nightmare on our people; we know who they are and they will be held to account. The imposition of multiculturalism and mass immigration is nothing but a heinous crime against the peoples and civilisations of Europe. The policy of race replacement is genocide against the peoples of Europe and genocide is a crime that must receive the harshest of punishments. The Cultural Marxists in the higher institutions of education must be crushed and replaced by patriotic historians and academics that will not use their ‘Ivory Tower’ existence to demoralise our young people by telling them that their race is bad and responsible for historic crimes that they must feel guilty for. Our people need to regain a sense of European and national pride; need to feel proud of their history and heritage and have strong patriotic feelings again. Once the enemies of European civilisation have been defeated we must ensure that the vile self-loathing reptiles of the Left never have the opportunity to spread the cancer of Cultural Marxism again.
Reply ↓
This comment by Matthew Roberts is featured as an article on Liberty GB´s website..:
http://libertygb.org.uk/v1/index.php/news-libertygb/6676-decisive-action-needed-to-avert-civil-war
The western “leaders” are ignoring nothing. They are well aware of what they are doing. They just need to be made aware that the White populations are becoming restless. That will happen as the neoprogressives at Whatever Heb brew Do continue to poke at the overly sensitive radical mussel men. If White Europeans and White Americans begin to also tease the ignorant half wit moron moon worshiping cloven hoofed hog tied followers of the pederast prophet of mecca they WILL get all upset and begin to show their real ugly face. They just need to be baited to pester the neoprogressives more, rape more feminist, smash more anti-fa in the face, disrupt every collage town neighborhood at 5am with morning payers and trash more kosher groceries. Life for the jews and neoprogressives in the west must become unbearable and the cause of their grief needs to be “it” islam. I suppose a clever bumper sticker on the car is a place to start bringing holy war to the road.
De-fanging Islam in the strategy discussed above may not be the top elite’s game plan. The neocons may be trotting out the Hegelian dialect yet again: Lop off some heads in Europe and force Jews into freezers in their own markets and wait for the European backlash: all that European support for Palestine goes out the window, paving the way for the realization of the “greater Israel” project.
Perhaps one day we will wake up to the “con” in neocon.
There doesn’t seem to be much hope in the Right waking up, but becoming increasingly Zionized. A bunch of shabez goyim. The way so many are so easily lining up to the beat of the Zionist drum is like a regurgitation of the anti-Soviet bollocks during the Cold War, where most of the Right was easily bamboozled into supporting the neo-Trotskyite crusade against the USSR in the name of anti-communism. How easily the “Right” shouts the slogans supplied to it by neocons, neo-trots, et al . Now in the name of white nationalism, a load of nonsense is being spouted about Islam which hardly differs from the neo-con ‘anti-Jihad’ websites. Presumably, the present stock of armchair warriors against ‘Islamization’ would have been just as easily fooled into supporting the war against the Axis. The present and past situations are not of Arab or Muslim making. It’s like seeing the Right regress to level moron. For fuck sake, get beyond inanities.
Communism really was a problem, and Islam really is a problem, for whites even if Jews, who are also problem, oppose{d} them for reasons that have nothing to do with white interests.
I am appalled that so many of those whom I took to be serious white nationalists are willing to accept a fabricated Muslim enemy on the basis of a false flag attack. Why do they think Jews have worked so hard to bring Muslims into Europe? Muslim immigration into European countries is a necessary element in the Jewish program to pit its enemies against one another. That scheme worked well in WW I and WW II, after which the Jews emerged as unassailable victors while Britain, France, Belgium, and The Netherlands – all lost their colonies. Germany was devastated and forever indebted to the Jewish state. The Soviet Union was set up for a Cold War that ensured continued military preoccupation and expenditures by the U.S. that could be hijacked to enlarge and enhance the power of Israel. This scheme is not only meant to give us a Muslim enemy, but to turn whites against each other
There is absolutely no credible evidence of a false flag attack. It seems rather suspicious to me that virtually every Muslim terrorist attack since 9/11 has been “unmasked” as a “false flag” attack, created by Jews, whites, or both working together in which Muslims are mere dupes and scapegoats.
I think several forces are at work here.
1. Anti-white trolls are trying to retard our movement by encouraging a paranoid, irrational style of conspiratorial thinking and to distract us from clear messaging about the Jewish and Muslim problems by introducing pointless debates premised on false dichotomies (either we blame the Muslims or the Jews) and ludicrous conspiracy theories.
2. Mono-maniacal anti-Semites who think that it is so important to blame Jews for all our problems that they are willing to fabricate conspiracies and tell lies to deny the existence of non-Jewish factors contributing to our situation. Since this pits them against reality and encourages a paranoid style of political thinking, it is self-defeating and leads to the same result at group one, who are actively trying to subvert our movement.
An additional motive of this line of thinking may be the desire to forge alliances with Muslims against Jews. I see no evidence that this has paid any dividends, certainly not dividends worth the price of becoming a stranger to the truth.
3. Muslims, who actually benefit the most from this propaganda, since it exonerates them of culpability while making both Jews and whites, especially racially conscious whites who are potentially their strongest opposition, to look like murderous monsters or paranoid clowns.
Is there a movement?
There seems to be some websites and forums, but too much infighting, arrogance and hostility.
Maybe Whites need to stop trying to trump each other and communicate.
Wow, this is really a great idea. Damn better than any solution our politicans have put forward (worthless bunch of lops.) I really think this might work. I only wish I could be in charge of administering and devising the curriculum. I’d mandate gay children stories in every madrasa. Critical muslim theory, courses taught on “muslim privilege”, “queer muslim theory”, gender studies, feminist hadith, neo-muslim colonialism, Arab slave trade, muslim liberation theology, tolerance, etc. On top of it all I would constantly shove the holocaust down their throats till they wrench.
I’m afraid this gelding of Islam could work.
Short of whites world wide becoming racial “fanatics” like our great grand fathers we are going to have to form traditional communities. These would consist of racial conscious whites living together in groups of 200 or more who would continue to prosetilize our more indoctrinated white neighbors.
There is a simple but effective way to get rid of both the Muslims and the Jews :
Forbid circumcision (out of “human rights” concern) and ritual slaughter (out of “animal rights” concern). 90% of the Muslims and the Jews will self-deport and when that has happened we can easily take care of the rest 10%.
This has already been proposed in several European countries and the Jews became hysterical. They even tried to cooperate with the Muslims to protect their “religious freedoms”. We need a strong lobby to push this through, but it can be done. Most Europeans consider the practices of circumcision and ritual slaughter “barbaric” and, being mainly secular themselves, are inclined to let moral considerations prevail above “religious rights”.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Edit your comment