The SPLC, Pornography, & “Hate Speech”Andrew Hamilton
The Montgomery, Alabama-based Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is a tax exempt, anti-First Amendment organization as “prestigious,” “respectable,” successful, and Establishmentarian as they come, deeply enmeshed with political, academic, and journalistic elites and the police/secret police apparatus of the state. (It is a mockery of law enforcement that not so long ago the types who staff the SPLC referred to American police officers as pigs.) The chairman is a rabbi.
For decades the organization, which uses allegations of “hate” as its mantra, has combined ADL-style defamation, spying, and dirty tricks with legal deceit and a pliant, cooperative judiciary to suppress the basic freedoms of thousands of American citizens, for whom it displays the utmost contempt. Together with the ADL and similar groups, it has done irreparable harm to this nation’s formerly free institutions.
Under Jewish tutelage, the state now calls pornography, formerly banned, “free speech,” while broad, ever-expanding swaths of traditionally free political, historical, scientific, and normative speech, which only Westerners established or maintained, are outlawed or effectively suppressed as “hate speech”—a Jewish neologism. (Pornography is actually commercialized prostitution and sex trafficking, not speech.)
Consider the staggering number of white girls who have been processed through the Jewish/government porn “industry” since the 1970s. (The efficient suppression of legitimate political and historical speech, and a long list of judicial precedents, demonstrates that pornography requires government’s blessing in order to thrive.)
On the simplest level, how many female “performers” have passed through this mill over the course of 44 years? (Impressionistically, it seems that the number of men has been far smaller, and disproportionately Jewish.) Thousands, certainly. Tens of thousands? Hundreds of thousands?
Who knows? The number is certainly enormous.
Does anyone believe that in a non-Jewish society all or even most of these girls, many of whom have contracted venereal diseases, died relatively young, or had their lives snuffed out early by suicide, would have been prostitutes? Isn’t it the case, instead, that human beings are malleable, and the behavior of most is highly plastic? In a healthy, white society, assuming the family had not been dismantled, wouldn’t many of these girls have lived normal lives as wives and mothers, not prostitutes, during their most fertile years?
As I’ve previously noted, much of contemporary pornography consists of a blatant form of propaganda called “interracial porn,” overwhelmingly concerned with depicting sex between white girls and black—but also Mexican, Asian, and hybrid—men, often several at one time. Other interracial porn, not labeled as such, involves Jewish men.
Interracial porn is motivated by a vile form of racism, often extremely explicit (that is, explicitly anti-white in its presentation and verbal expression), which has obviously had far-reaching social consequences due to porn’s ubiquity. It does not take a genius to see that race and sex are intimately connected, and that the authority to propagate images and manipulate mass perceptions, values, and behavior in this area has placed enormous power in Jewish hands.
When you get right down to it, sex is the focal point of population genetics, demographics, the family, and racial survival or destruction.
Contemporary pornography profoundly undermines normal patterns of sex, marriage, and family, as well as the biological continuity of our people. It has been more damaging, more important in achieving Jewish/government objectives of destroying the family and preventing births within the group, than has the mainstream media that propagates identical themes in superficially slicker and more acceptable ways.
For philo-Semitic “Jews are not the problem” enthusiasts, I note again that Mark Potok of the SPLC had the gall to lend his organization’s name and authority to an article published on a Washington Post-owned website accusing white girls exploited in pornography of “racism”!
Imagine me saying to this precious Jew of yours: “Instead of white girls, let white videographers, photographers, and “actors”—not Jews—publicly sexually exploit thousands of young Jewish girls in exactly the same manner, depicting them having sex with black and other Gentile men, ostentatiously advertising their religion and ethnicity, demeaning them, ridiculing Jews and Judaism, like the crosses hung around ‘Christian’ girls’ necks, or scenes involving nuns, churches, and weddings. Let’s have that, instead, you goddamned proponent of ‘tolerance,’ you goddamned piece of shit.”
That would deeply trouble philo-Semites, though the present state of affairs does not.
Claims to Oppose “Hate Speech”
The SPLC’s raison d’être is the abolition of “hate speech” and freedom of association.
Gentile and right-wing words, Jews solemnly intone—and governments agree—are identical to deeds. That is the academic and legal rationale for the suppression of non-Jewish speech: that words have, or can have, consequences.
What nobody ever says, of course, is that Jewish, Leftist, and government words also have consequences. In the Middle East, such words have led to the deaths of tens of thousands of people. In the West they are responsible for genocide and totalitarianism.
In 2012, the SPLC’s published material was utilized by a gunman carrying a loaded semi-automatic pistol and 100 rounds of ammunition in an attempt to kill everyone at the Family Research Council’s (FRC) Washington, DC headquarters, and then smear Chik-fil-A sandwiches in their dead faces.
The FRC is a conservative Christian group opposed to homosexual marriage and abortion.
Chik-fil-A is a fast food restaurant whose president had publicly spoken out against homosexual marriage. As a result, the company was virulently attacked in the press, by Jews (including the SPLC), homosexuals, Left-wing groups, and powerful politicians such as Chicago mayor and former Obama White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, the son of an Israeli terrorist member of the Irgun, and himself a member of the Israeli army in 1991.
The crime received remarkably little press coverage. As the Daily Caller noted, “It seems hard to believe, but once upon a time there was a shooting the national news didn’t want to talk about. . . . just blocks from the White House . . . But hey, who cares? Political speech only creates an ‘atmosphere of violence’ when it can be pinned on conservatives.”
The gunman’s premeditated killing spree was foiled by the FRC’s black security guard, who was shot in the arm as he grappled with the spree killer. The bullet shattered bones in his arm and left him permanently injured.
According to a statement by the FBI, attacker Floyd Corkins “targeted the Family Research Council because of its views [emphasis added], including its advocacy against recognition of gay marriage. He entered the building with the intention of shooting and killing as many employees of the organization as he could.” During the fray he uttered remarks such as, “I don’t like these people, and I don’t like what they stand for.”
Corkins rehearsed his act beforehand, engaging in shooting practice the night before. In his pants pocket were two fully loaded magazine clips, and in his backpack a box of 50 rounds of 9mm ammunition and 15 individually wrapped Chick-fil-A sandwiches.
Corkins told the FBI that he was a political activist and intended to kill as many people as possible and smear the Chick-fil-A sandwiches on their faces. “Chick-fil-A came out against gay marriage,” he said, “so I was going to use that as a statement.”
He was also carrying a handwritten list of the names of the Family Research Council and three other organizations with socially conservative agendas. Had he not been stopped at the FRC, he intended to go to the second organization on his list and wage a similar shooting spree there.
The politically correct shooter was sentenced to 25 years in prison for an act of armed terrorism and assault with intent to kill—but, because he was a black homosexual motivated by hatred of heterosexual Christians, the federal government did not charge him with a hate crime, which would have greatly increased his sentence. Had he been a white right-winger, it would have.
Jewish “hate crime” laws, enacted and enforced by government, selectively target whites. They aim to stifle any possible backlash by whites against genocide. They are also precursors to “hate speech” laws violative of the First Amendment.
The FBI in its press release made no mention of the role played by SPLC publications in the commission of the crime. Given its intimate relationship with the Jewish organization, doing so would be tantamount to admitting that the FBI itself had a connection to the terrorist act—precisely the kind of connection it closely monitors American citizens for.
Corkins selected his targets by utilizing the SPLC’s list of “anti-gay” groups and doing his research on its website.
In his statement to the court, FRC President Tony Perkins said:
He planned his attack in great detail and hoped for massive casualties. . . . prosecutors revealed that Mr. Corkins had obtained our building location from the Southern Poverty Law Center’s website. He was clearly inspired by the [SPLC]’s labeling of FRC as a “hate group” based on our belief that marriage can only take place between one man and one woman . . . His goal and that of the SPLC is to silence those with whom they disagree.
With typical gall Potok smirked immediately after the shooting: “The FRC and its allies on the religious right are saying, in effect, that offering legitimate and fact-based criticism in a democratic society is tantamount to suggesting that the objects of criticism should be the targets of criminal violence.”
When the Jews do it, it’s “legitimate, fact-based criticism in a democratic society”; when Gentiles do it, it’s criminal “hate speech.”
The SPLC still lists the FRC as a hate group on its website, and maintains a map showing its location. It never denounced Corkins’ actions, as far as I could determine—an approach whites should emulate. (A homosexual group with which Corkins was associated did denounce his act.)
The SPLC, of course, did not suffer the slightest blowback. The terrorism it indirectly instigated—a classic example of hate speech as Jews, Leftists, and governments define it when they oppose an actor’s ideas—did not matter in the least.
And these are the people the government assiduously serves—in America, in the Middle East, in Europe, in Russia, everywhere. Our nation’s leaders revivify torture, facilitate assassinations (1, 2, 3), destroy Constitutional liberties, physically mutilate and murder foreign leaders, subvert, attack, and overthrow one foreign government after another, and slaughter people by the thousands . . . because it’s good for the Jews.
“Good for the Jews.”
Jesus. What else matters?
Rolf Peter Sieferle a skandál kolem jeho osoby
Nueva Derecha vs. Vieja Derecha Capítulo 2: Hegemonía
Remembering Louis-Ferdinand Céline (May 27, 1894–July 1, 1961)
Úryvky z Finis Germania Rolfa Petera Sieferleho, část 2: „Věčný nacista“
The (So-Called) New York “Thought Criminals” & the “Intellectual Dark Web”
The Psychology of the Politically Correct
Librarians are Bad for Children
The Burial of the Blarney Stone: Ireland’s New Hate Speech Legislation
I’d encourage anyone who still does to stop watching pornography. It is vile and insidious and no strong White man should be reduced to watching such disgusting spectacles as pornographic videos. It is bad for your mental and spiritual health. This is besides the point that such websites only fund pornographers to produce more of the stuff, which is typically more depraved than what came before.
This “TED Talk”, called ‘The Great Porn Experiment’, has helped grow the NoFap group (men pledging not to masturbate or consume porn) into the hundreds of thousands.
The talk is VERY informative, and helps articulate effects of pornography that us (former) users always sense, but can never quite crystalize:
Cutting out all masturbation might be asking too much for many. Cutting out pornography should be sufficient.
While I do not consider myself a Christian, I am on their side in this. Instead of kidnapping and raping women, these predators have gotten into the soul of white people and corrupted us. The first step is seeing the corruption. I will admit women are particularly vulnerable to suggestion and coercion by propaganda, especially those brought up in an atmosphere of needing to please.
I know why the church killed the witches. They were not so willing to please. Bygones be bygones, the enemy is worse now. The soul of the white race is at stake.
Feminists and Wiccans talk about the “burning times” and millions of deaths. Scholars talk about 30,000 or so, the vast majority of them other Christians. Seems like a real mind shaft gap here. Interesting note: Pagan scholars disavow the whole thing as hysteria. I agree and think that it is influenced by another hysteria which claims that millions of people were killed.
It depends upon which scholars you read. Cultural Marxist scholars of course disavow it. They are into togetherness and equality. Try some heathen scholars.
Porn is nevertheless an interesting illustration of several extremely politically incorrect phenomena.
First, Its possible that the over-representation of white girls in porn is also a matter of market demand. A quick troll around the websites “mainstream” porn companies (by which I mean the ones who can afford to charge subscription fees, and use film-quality production and video quality; logically the most commercially successful, and there fore logically those that can hire the most successful “actresses”) will reveal that women’s attractiveness corresponds to race realist theories on the matter. That is, WAY over-representative white, then asian, latina, and a very very few black women. Porn companies which use predominantly black women have a distinctly “ghetto” (read: marketed to black men) flavor.
Second, black on white porn is almost always clearly (though usually implicitly) based on the conception of black men as dirty, inappropriate, or feral. For whatever reason, it seems to play to the perception in the (predominantly white) audience to view the girl as more debased or dirty by virtue having sex with blacks. Healthy? Probably not, but it shows that white men have a much less rosy view of blacks than they profess in public.
A quick troll around the websites “mainstream” porn companies … will reveal that women’s attractiveness corresponds to race realist theories on the matter.
No, it won’t. White nationalist conceptions of the beauty of the white woman hardly equate with those of producers and consumers of their model women who epitomise the idiocy and degeneracy of our age, white or otherwise. Further, you’re suggesting that exploiting, using, abusing, objectifying, raping, and mutilating denotes attraction. Perhaps. It also denotes hatred. That is, hatred of white women.
…but it shows that white men have a much less rosy view of blacks than they profess in public.
No, it doesn’t. It shows that the idea of the black male as violator of white women is thought of as a viable means to get off. That it is normal. It also shows that producers and consumers of pornography like to see white women get mistreated. There is nothing politically incorrect about an industry of misery that ultimately trades in the dehumanisation of our white daughters. Commodities that are calculated to excite and arouse vapid simpletons are a symptom of modernity and hyper-liberalism and are essentially anti-family and anti-folk. Pornography epitomises the liberal project.
Years ago I capitalized “White,” primarily because William Pierce did so, and his writing had a major influence on me. Later, however, I adopted the normative “white.” I still write Gentile the way Pierce did, with a capital G.
I always write Jew or Jewish with a capital letter, because that is the way it is done and it looks visually odd to me when some people, usually white racialists, use the lower case jew or jewish.
Mexican and American are nationalities, and are capitalized. They are analogous to Swedish, Norwegian, English, Scottish, German, and so on, which are also capitalized.
“Asian” is not a nationality, but more encompassing and, yes, it is capitalized. Mestizo is likewise a broad racial, not national, term that is capitalized. Indian in the Western Hemisphere is another such term. I usually use Amerindian instead—but, again, it is a racial term that is capitalized.
Note that black, like white, is ordinarily not capitalized, and I do not capitalize it, either. William Pierce was consistent, and did capitalize it, as he did White. I capitalize Negro when I use it. I rarely use the word African, but it is a non-national term like Asian, Mestizo, and Indian that is usually capitalized. I never use African American.
If I were to use Caucasian as a synonym for white I would capitalize it, but I think it is confusing and misleading and should never be used as a synonym in that way, so I never do use it.
I am not opposed to the capitalization of White, though to me white looks more natural. Wilmot Robertson never capitalized it.
Gentile derives from Latin. It is also used by Mormons. In our day, Jews are so overwhelmingly dominant, racially, that it is necessary to recognize how they see the world. Whereas we perceive different races, Jews first and foremost see a single major division of all mankind: Jews and Gentiles (all non-Jews, of every race). I think this is a legitimate, indeed necessary, distinction to make in our time. I give different ethical meanings to the two terms, the reverse of the Jews’.
It’s a new day. American Whites are a new nation. Capitalize us. Don’t wait for the reality on the ground – help bring it about it in this small symbolic way as you already are in other ways.
The Enemy is noted for his thoroughness. No symbolism is too small that he overlooks it.
Counter-Currents does not capitalize “white.” Move on.
“…hate speech”—a Jewish neologism.”
I’d argue that “homosexual marriage” is also a Jewish neologism… but I also think Anti-Semite is manipulative.
“The efficient suppression of legitimate political and historical speech, and a long list of judicial precedents, demonstrates that pornography requires government’s blessing in order to thrive.”
Well worth thinking about, as well as what the government gains from distracting and disspiriting a section of the populace with porn.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Edit your comment