Culture as Programming
A Case Study of Frau Löwenherz, aka Leonie Plaar
Part 1
Richard Parker

Leonie Plaar standing among the environs that surround her. She has been conditioned to be content with that which is objectively distressing and jarring. A perfect symbol for modern Germany and Europe on the precipice of oblivion. (Image source: Frau Loewenherz Instagram page)
1,992 words
Part 1 of 2 (Part 2 here)
Meet Leonie Plaar, who goes by the moniker Frau Löwenherz as well as Leonie Löwenherz: far-left, Lesbian, and antifa, she is a most grotesque figure who exemplifies many of our troubles. Quite regrettably, she has a TikTok account with over 500,000 followers, while other social media accounts, namely her German-language TikTok and Instagram accounts, have just under 100,000 and just over 50,000 followers, respectively.[1] She has made various appearances on German television, some of which were made objects of derision and ridicule by a number of detractors. Most amusing of all, she stormed off Twitter and migrated onto Bluesky due to Elon Musk’s policies allowing users to express themselves more freely, including those that offend her far-Left orthodoxy.

A screenshot of her last tweet announcing her departure from Twitter. The German language, along with her likeness, are weaponized against that very essence.
Pictures from several years ago attest to her natural beauty which she has, to put it mildly, neglected. Facial contortions from a permanent state of outrage manifesting from the wokescold ideology seem to be making her if not ugly, far less attractive. There is a certain bitter irony in her moniker of Frau Löwenherz, a name that draws from her Germanic personage even as her message and very being advocate for the abolition of Germany and the German people. In this way, she and her handlers are using her Germanic phenotype and mannerisms to deconstruct or dismantle that Germanic essence. Given how pedestrian and unoriginal her takes are, a matter discussed at length below, one cannot help but conclude she has been choreographed and boosted by certain nefarious, powerful interests.
In this video from last year, this woman made a presentation in Cologne talking about her decision to cut off contact with her father. Her stated reasons, like most if not everything this woman has ever uttered, are cut whole cloth from the boilerplate of cliched thoughts of the far-Left hive mind that pervade both America and Europe. What grievances compelled her to such a drastic decision? Her father supports Alternativ für Deutschland (AfD), and is generally opposed to how the Bundesrepublik handled the COVID pandemic and vaccination requirements.[2] For these unforgivable sins — for such political heresy of the day — she destroyed her relationship with her father, as it is unclear what effect this has had with other members of her family. Based on what is divulged in this presentation, by all accounts he was and is a loving father (she describes herself as a Papakind, or daddy’s favorite), and a man who, supporting the AfD, loves Germany and wants to protect it from national and racial suicide.

The video is distressing, but there are some silver linings. The YouTube thumbs-down extension reveals a ratio of over four to one dislikes and likes, and that is with the disincentive to even bother given how YouTube tries to hide such feedback. In addition, a number of German-language comments left by antifa sorts and other such Lefty rabble indicate that a number of comments denouncing this woman, the decisions she made, and what she stands for have been deleted.
A brief perusal of her TikTok accounts and other content reveals that she only utters tired clichés that could very well be taken verbatim by millions of others so inclined, both when she is speaking in English and her native German, with some buzzwords including “cishet male,” “toxic relationships,” and “all men” being a few that stick out on her main TikTok page. Another cliché from her German TikTok account is “Liebe wen Du willst” (love whom you want). While in college, as she was being indoctrinated into cultural Marxist claptrap, she wrote a poem called “Alter Weißer Mann” (“Old White Man),” proving that pulling all the registers from intersectionalist feminism and other such wokery is a tried-and-true formula for poetry so bad it doesn’t warrant discussion, let alone translation. Then there is this presentation on a Ted Talk offshoot: Aside from speaking in unoriginal boilerplate, her far-Left activism seems to be correlated to putting on some pounds. But just as this reveals that she and so many of her ilk are incapable of an original thought or idea, the ubiquity of these clichés, the maggots of the mind, further demonstrate how they have consumed so many tens of millions, across different nations and languages. It is such unvaried, uniform regurgitation of the very same language that gave rise to the NPC meme.

A screenshot of her Ted Talk. More thumbs down ratings than otherwise, and this despite the disincentive to even bother. One is reluctant to make comments on another’s appearance, but she has packed on some pounds. One can only infer that the dysfunction of her far-Left nuttery is giving her the body of a middle-aged woman before reaching 30.
Many such clichés are seen in this video. Use of the word “triggered” to describe how Plaar has rightly incurred the ire of her detractors, or “non-binary lesbian” friends as the people she was protecting by destroying the relationship with her father. Denouncing the AfD for “at the very least taking an indirect part in deaths of people” sounds very reminiscent of Lefty woke jargon about “stochastic terrorism” lodged against various right-of-center influencers. When discussing her decision to cut off her father, and ostensibly much of her actual family, she talked about how she has her own family of friends and supporters in the LGTBQ community. She has a “magnificent family” (großartige Familie), a family of queer people her age, by now a tired adage repeated many thousands of times over. This is a familiar yarn, covered for example in Irreversible Damage by Abigail Shrier, which discusses at length the modus operandi of those indoctrinated in the transgender cult to cut off family as a matter of course (sometimes while still accepting payments for college tuition and living expenses). It is a growing phenomenon that is coming to characterize millennials and Generation Z. In most contemptible fashion, at the conclusion of this presentation Plaar encourages others in a similar situation as hers to do the same, asserting that no one is obligated to maintain a relationship with people who “are a danger to you,” “take energy from you,” or that “you do not feel comfortable around,” assuring audience members there is a “family out there for you.”

Towards the end of the presentation, seen above, Plaar encourages audience members to cut contact with family members they disagree with. The image of Grumpy Cat is a bizarre touch to such a sinister message. In addition to how terribly dated “Grumpy Cat” is, another silver lining is the downvote to upvote ratio, exceeding 4-1.
That every utterance is so thoroughly unoriginal — verbatim the same slogans, phrases, and sentences simply translated into German — is proof that she is a product of cultural programming. As explicated in “Thrust Into It All; The Individual Defined by Culture and Circumstance,” we all are a product of cultural programming to a profound, even incalculable degree. A great irony of individuals such as Frau Plaar is that she assuredly likens herself to be a very unique individual. Many of her videos denounce racism, neo-Nazis, and the like, from which it can be inferred that she has lapped up — with a voracious appetite and most ardent fervor — the servings of Kriegschuld offered to her on an unremittent basis since birth as a “good,” modern German.
As explained in “Thrust Into It All,” one could take an exact clone of Plaar, place her in a different cultural milieu and period of time, and that clone — by virtue of being born in that different time and circumstance alone — would be a radically different individual than what we now behold. If she were not born in modern Germany with the decades of national self-flagellation, the indoctrination through both education and culture of Kriegschuld talking points, but in Germany in the 1920s or ‘30s, she would most likely have views that would make her father and other AfD supporters seem radical in a very different way — not because of any accusations of being “far Right,” but because of their classical liberalism and, one would presume, some measure of aversion to Hitler and the more onerous policies of that regime. If she were born in the 1920s or ‘30s, she would have been compelled to join the Bund Deutscher Mädel, but most likely would have joined of her own free volition, to the extent one really chooses to do anything at all.
Rather than be indoctrinated with war guilt, and later the tenets of intersectionalism and other such cultural Marxist jargon proffered at the University of Osnabrück and elsewhere, she would have a greater awareness as well as righteous resentment and indignation toward the number of hardships afflicted on the German people in the wake of the 1918 armistice and later the Versailles Diktat, including paying not a million but a billion marks for a loaf of bread during the number of inflation crises that Germany experienced, as well as the nigh one million Germans who died during the naval blockade of 1918, among the other hardships and indignities suffered by the German people on direct account of the do-goody Western democracies. Doubtless she would also have had a more enlightened view of the legitimacy of Germany’s territorial claims on the Sudetenland and Danzig, as well as a more enthusiastic view of marching into the Rhineland Palatinate (Germany marching into her own backyard) and the Anschluss (Austrians overwhelmingly supported it). Coverage of atrocities and mass murder in Stalin’s Soviet Russia in German newspapers in the 1920s and ’30s further informed the worldviews of those who came of age in that historical period.

Images of BDM girls such as this are illustrative. The programming instilled from that cultural milieu versus the one we see today is the only real difference between women such as this and those like Frau Plaar. Culture matters, and matters more than anything. Culture is of course a projection of power.
Please see the author’s Substack, The Raven’s Call, which features additional writings from a hard-Right perspective.
Notes
[1] To dissuade readers from adding view counts, links to her English- and German-language TikTok accounts are provided here, as is her general website. Archived versions: https://archive.is/fQNjm; https://archive.is/os20a; https://archive.is/5PCBj
[2] She makes a number of outlandish claims in denouncing both the AfD and her father. In addition to accusing the AfD of engaging in “Nazi rhetoric,” and associating the party with the Hitler salute, she further claims her father indulged in conspiracy theories about Bill Gates wanting to put microchips in people through the experimental vaccines. In addition, she states that the last utterance compelling her to break off contact with her father was when he “unironically compared the vaccine mandate to the Holocaust.” She even accuses AfD supporters of engaging in rhetoric expressing a desire to see “people like me dead,” a sentiment that I cannot condemn entirely but also highly doubt has any basis in fact, particularly as Alice Weidel is lesbian. Given the number of outlandish statements she has made that have no apparent basis in fact, one would be wise to consider her an unreliable narrator. Shortly before the Holocaust accusation, at approximately 15:25, she challenges her parents regarding the vaccine by asking what would convince them to take it. Her father replied, “Nothing.” This is much more likely to have happened, and, of course, is no reason to destroy a relationship with a loving father. Finally, this video likely references her last visit with her father, demonstrating that her intentions were not in good faith. She went there looking for a fight.
Culture%20as%20Programming%0AA%20Case%20Study%20of%20Frau%20L%C3%B6wenherz%2C%20aka%20Leonie%20Plaar%0APart%201%0A
Share
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate at least $10/month or $120/year.
- Donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Everyone else will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days. Naturally, we do not grant permission to other websites to repost paywall content before 30 days have passed.
- Paywall member comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Paywall members have the option of editing their comments.
- Paywall members get an Badge badge on their comments.
- Paywall members can “like” comments.
- Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, please visit our redesigned Paywall page.
Related
-
Are We So Back or Not? The Case For Cautious Optimism in the Second Trump Administration
-
The Non-Exploding Boom Mic and Everything That Could Go Wrong
-
Conservatism Plus X
-
What minds what we matter?
-
The Wages of Epstein Hysteria
-
Neither Elon Musk Nor DOGE Will Save White America
-
DOGE Against the Machine
-
Ashley & I
9 comments
My, what an independent mind! What a unique individual, just like all her lefty friends. Surely it takes great courage to say that you’re against the litany of “isms”, especially in our present time. The heart of a lion indeed.
Thanks for reading. Not sure what to make of it being in two parts. I can tell you the second part carries a punch (the main thesis is mostly set forth in that second half), but I am biased, of course. I do hope you and everyone enjoys it, even though the subject matter is unpleasant.
The anti-White, anti-folkish ‘left’ (jews and their wake-riders) are very good at linking all their adversaries into a giant single Adversary. What is the connection between ‘Nazi’ and ‘vaccine rejection’? It’s not obvious to me but it’s obvious to Lowenherz because it is an unspoken Leftist dogma that the only possible opposition to ‘Left’ hegemony is a ‘Right’ hegemony. But that’s not what’s happening and pro-Whites shouldn’t accept this framing of the relationship between hegemonic jewish supremacist anti-folkishness and it’s rather diverse opposition. Opposing the Left Hegemon isn’t a Right Hegemon. The Right has been trying to sell its wares without success for 3 centuries. Instead, the Left Hegemon has alienated so many people for so many different reasons that the Left Hegemon finds itself fighting ‘the war of the flea’ with a thousand different fleas hopping about and creating small – but still destabilizing – problems.
The Left Hegemon has to position itself as the Underdog because that is the only common value among leftists (jews and their wake-riders). The only way the Underdog narrative is even slightly plausible is if ‘Fascism’ is everywhere just waiting to break into history. Oddly enough, this makes ‘Fascism’ as the Messiah of their opponents, waiting to enter into history in the name of something outside history (namely ‘anti-semitism’).
The ‘fascism’ of the Left is the Left’s fantasy of the Adversary, not their actual adversary.
And it’s this blindness to the true nature of their opposition that fuels their reactionary responses and further advances the cause of ‘populism’.
That’s one of the best short explanations for the Left’s perception of its enemies I’ve ever read. Thanks
I would add that the reason why they must identify with the underdog role is their fundamental opposition to anything related to hierarchy, excellence and spiritual elevation. Unexpectedly, they seem to take this so far that human life is not seen as having more value than animal life, as this chart of “moral allocation by ideology” indicates:
https://nitter.poast.org/pic/orig/media%2FGQnBLswWMAA3djz.jpg
A bizarre materialist egalitarian pan[non]theism, which ties together anti-folkism with their brand of rather anti-human environmentalism.
This was outstanding, as was the Substack article you linked to.
The psychological destruction of the German nation is heartbreaking. This poor man joins an anti-immigration party because he doesn’t want Germans to be replaced in their homeland, and not only does his daughter not talk to him anymore, but she gains clout online for publicly bashing him. Awful.
The good news is that just as the culture among White people has degenerated since WW2, this same process can be reversed. It happened before in Germany after the Weimar period and it can happen again.
Thank you for your kind words. It is very common for a certain sort to blame the family for this sort of thing, an utterance which offends me personally (as someone made that very utterance to me). This idea that people can homeschool our way out of this (homeschooling by the way is not permitted in Germany, an idea I might agree with in a healthy society) or that somehow a person or individual or family can be insulated from the cultural environs that envelop us all is sheer madness. People are only now becoming aware of the state of universities, but I am not sure ceding higher education to the left carte blanche is a winning strategy, and in any case hindsight is always 20-20.
I cannot wait for the second part to drop. I am biased of course, but I do think it will have some surprises.
Finally, thank you so much for your kind comments re my other essay. If you like my writing, please consider subscribing.
Hi, just wanted to mention, I loved this blog post.
It was inspiring. Keep on posting!
Great writing. As much as I hate the subject, (Plaar), I kept reading. And yes, females like this go everywhere looking for a fight. Interestingly, lesbians have the highest rate of physical abuse of any type of couples. I don’t think that’s a coincidence.
Thank you so much. I trust you read the second part that comprises this essay in its entirety.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment