Counter-Currents
Mug shot of Lexi Jade Brown from the Gulfport Police Department.
2,022 words / 14:42
15-Year-Old Mississippi Girl Who Stabbed Her Sleeping Mother: Mom Was a “Weird Bitch” Who Was “Suppressing the Black in Me”
I think that we can all agree that regardless of your race, creed, religion, or where you live, it’s incredibly rude to wake up your mother by stabbing her. What’s even more appalling is, rather than calling an ambulance or trying to attend to your mother’s wounds, attempting to set the house you share with mom ablaze right after stabbing her. And the most egregious breach of good manners and all known forms of mother-daughter etiquette is to show no remorse upon arrest and brazenly telling police that the woman whose loins birthed you is a “weird bitch.”
Audio version: To listen in a player, use the one below or click here. To download the mp3, right-click here and choose “save link/target as.”
The frankly shocking events I describe occurred slightly before last week began but are worth shoehorning into this week’s news since the police didn’t announce them until last Monday. According to an “Attempted Murder News Release” posted on Facebook by the Gulfport Police Department way down yonder in Mississippi:
On June 14, 2024, the Gulfport Police Department arrested 15-year-old Lexi Jade Brown and charged her with one count of attempted murder and one count of first-degree arson.
At approximately 2:33 a.m. on June 14, 2024, the Gulfport Police Department responded to the 13000 block of Dee Avenue in reference to a cutting incident. Upon arrival, officers located a victim suffering from multiple stab wounds[.]
The investigation revealed that the victim was asleep in bed when she awoke to find Brown attacking her with a knife. Brown then attempted to start a fire inside the residence. The victim was transported to a local hospital for treatment.
While being questioned by detectives, Brown stated she had been planning to kill the victim because she found her to be a “weird bitch” and accused her of “suppressing the black in her.”
Brown was processed and transported to the Harrison County Adult Detention Center, where she is being held on a $1,250,000 bond set by Judge Patano.
Court records say that Li’l Miz Brown’s next court date is scheduled for Wednesday. She is not being charged with evidence-tampering, so it’s not clear exactly why the young lass apparently tried to start a fire after stabbing her mom.
Since juveniles over the age of 13 are tried as adults for crimes in Mississippi, we not only get the accused’s name, we are also treated to the petulant, impenitent, and facially tattooed youngster’s mug shot. Her mother, who was rushed to a hospital and treated for her stab wounds, is apparently still alive and still unidentified. In a journalistic sense, it would help if I could at least see a picture of the victim. Better yet, I’d like to see some video of her talking so that I could cast my judgment as to whether or not this woman was, indeed, a “weird bitch.”
You can buy Jim Goad’s ANSWER Me! here.
There is no hint of a father being anywhere in the picture.
Since the underage mother-stabber has apparently confessed, there is no question as to her guilt. The biggest unsolved mystery here is what the defiant, mama-slashin’ 15-year-old girl meant by saying her mother was “suppressing the black” in her.
Some have speculated that she meant her mother was trying to put a damper on her daughter’s dark, demonic, and if you may, “evil” side. It’s possible, but I doubt that’s what she meant.
The more plausible explanation is that her daughter was a female wigger — a wigress? — who was attempting to ingratiate herself with local blacks at school, much to her mother’s disapproval.
Mississippi is truly the most “Southern” state I’ve been to in all of the negative senses. US News ranks this squalid land of red clay and soul-flattening humidity 48th out of all states based on 71 metrics spanning eight categories, and that’s without even taking into account that on a per-capita basis, Ole Miss is the blackest state in the Union. Mississippi’s Negro Quotient is a terrifying 39% — a full five points ahead of its closest competitor, Louisiana.
According to an analysis by Vera, Mississippi’s prison population is 62% black. If tried as an adult and convicted, I’m unsure whether Lexi Jade Brown would be sent to an adult prison, but it’s safe to assume that wherever she gets caged, she will be a racial minority. It’s also likely that she will wind up regretting she didn’t listen to that weird bitch’s “racist” advice.
First Coolio, Now Foolio: Another Dead Rapper with Ridiculous Hair
I’ve previously written about how dangerous it is to be a rapper — and not because rappers exist in a white-supremacist society where some cracker asshole is always itching to drag them from behind a truck or some asshole cop is yearning to kneel on their neck while they slowly die from a fentanyl overdose, but rather because blacks are highly competitive people, and there’s always some other aspirant rapper willing to make his bones by shooting you full of lead and then doing a song about it.
In 2022, a rapper who called himself Coolio — born Artis Leon Ivey, Jr., because apparently his dad felt that the world needed more than one Artis Leon Ivey — was fortunate enough to escape this vale of tears not at the trigger-happy hands of a player-hatin’ rapper, but due to an “accidental overdose” of fentanyl, heroin, and meth. Apart from winning a Grammy for his 1995 song “Gangsta’s Paradise,” Coolio was most notable for a hairdo that made it look as if a half-dozen black octopi were attempting to escape from his skull.
I never miss an opportunity to tell people that the City of Tampa, Florida was named after the Spanish word for “tampon,” and they almost always believe me. Now comes word from down Tampa way that Charles Jones — whose “rapper” name was “Foolio” — was shot and killed last weekend after being ambushed in the parking lot of a Holiday Inn motel while in the course of celebrating his 26th birthday.
Since I am never one to judge, I’ll allow you to decide whether Foolio’s hair was more ridiculous than Coolio’s. The most apt way I could describe Foolio’s coiffure is that it looks as if the Island Boys’ hair had lost their erections.
Believe it or not — I always find these things hard to believe, because some noble impulse embedded deeply within my soul refuses to accept that the world has actually become as stupid as it’s obviously become — at the time of his death, Foolio had a million followers on Instagram and nearly one million monthly listeners on the music streaming platform Spotify. He’d been making music since 2015 and was part of a clique of Jacksonville-based rappers who made music about the real-life murders of their competitors, naming names and everything. As Jacksonville’s News 4 put it, “Jones was known for his popular drill rap videos with controversial lyrics about murders involving rival gangs in Jacksonville.”
In April, while announcing the release of his album Resurrection, Foolio posted that he’d already weathered “MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS ON MY LIFE.” Alas, only two months later, he failed to survive what he might have called the “multiplest” attempt on his life. Someone else, possibly with an even more creative hair stylist, will undoubtedly make a song about it, only to be shot down by another young buck with an IQ of 10 whose woolly mane was carefully sculpted to resemble the wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald.
Study: Urban/Rural Political Divide Is Only Significant among Whites
As I’ve previously stated — many times — if there’s a way to divide white people, it will be tried, and it will almost always succeed. You can argue about the reasons for this until you are blue, red, or at least no longer white in the face, but it seems like an irrefutable fact. If there were only two white people left on the planet, they’d somehow find a way to go for each other’s jugular over the most trifling of differences.
Back in March, Taylor & Francis Online published a study titled “A rural-urban political divide among whom? Race, ethnicity, and political behavior across place.” According to the abstract:
Over the past 30 years, the United States has developed a rural-urban political divide, as rural voters have become increasingly reliable Republican voters while long-term patterns of Democratic voting in the largest cities have also consolidated in many smaller cities and suburbs as well. Yet, although 1 in 4 rural dwellers now identify as people of color, research on the rural-urban divide has either mostly centered on the behavior and attitudes of non-Hispanic whites, or assumed that nonwhites have exhibited similar behavior to whites. Does this political cleavage exist among people of color? We find that the growing rural-urban divide is driven primarily by white Americans, while rural people of color differ much less, if at all, from their urban counterparts in voting behavior and policy attitudes. In addition to highlighting the need for more research on the politics of rural people of color, our findings raise concerns about the political representation of rural Black Americans and Latinos.
Naturally — since we can presume most “academics” these days lean so far to the left it’s a wonder they don’t fall off the horizon and plummet into the abyss — the study’s authors seemed to fret far more about the idea that “rural people of color” weren’t sufficiently represented politically than they were about the fact that colored yokels seemed to align with colored urbanites on matters of policy, whereas urban whites and rural whites were at loggerheads with one another politically.
On June 7, the London School of Economics published an article titled “The rural-urban political divide is mostly driven by white voters, and there are fewer divisions over policy than many think” that parsed the data from the March study, including several helpful graphs. Among its conclusions:
- In 1970, the share of the population “identifying as non-white” was a piddling 13% in urban areas and 11% in rural areas. By 2020, the urban share of non-whites had ballooned to 46%. Those “identifying as non-white” in rural areas had also grown, but to 25%.
- In the 1972 presidential election, regardless of race, rural voters leaned 65% Republican, whereas urban voters leaned 59% Republican — not much of a difference at all. But in 2020, rural voters leaned 64% Republican, while Republicans got only 43% of the urban vote.
- Analyzing voting patterns in presidential elections from 2008 to 2020 found that urban whites leaned Republican by only 53 to 47%, whereas rural whites voted Republican by 64 to 36%. In stark contrast to the urban/rural voting divide among whites, researchers found no statistically significant differences in voting patterns among blacks and Latinos regardless of where they lived.
Last Friday, an analysis of the March study was published on Phys.org and titled “Growing rural-urban divide exists only among white Americans”:
The study compared Black, Latino and white voters, urban and rural, between 2008 and 2020. Black support for the Democratic Party was very high — around 90% — in both rural and urban areas from 2008 to 2020, with support for Republicans consistently very low. Latino support for Democrats remained consistent nationally for this period with only a few points of variation among both rural and urban voters.
White support in urban areas was split almost 50% Democrat/50% Republican from 2008 to 2020, with a slight Republican edge.
It was only among white voters that a large and growing disparity appeared between rural and urban residents, the researchers found.
The question needs further study, the researchers said, theorizing that varying degrees of “linked fate” — a term coined by political scientist Michael Dawson, implying the belief that one’s individual fate is tied to that of their racial or ethnic group — can help explain why Black and Latino Americans do not diverge.
Ah, there’s your answer: Blacks and Latinos share a “linked fate” — they identify as black and Latino no matter where they live. In other words, they think in tandem as distinct racial groups. Whites don’t think that way. Is this a genetic quirk that only whites have, or have they systematically been propagandized, shamed, and bullied into splitting hairs over the most trifling matters? Discuss.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate at least $10/month or $120/year.
- Donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Everyone else will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days. Naturally, we do not grant permission to other websites to repost paywall content before 30 days have passed.
- Paywall member comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Paywall members have the option of editing their comments.
- Paywall members get an Badge badge on their comments.
- Paywall members can “like” comments.
- Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, please visit our redesigned Paywall page.
34 comments
There was a young man in Texas a number of years back who killed his mom and sister “because they were racist,” in a similar fashion. There would seem to be some tendency to take up with the national media against one’s family in the strongest possible terms.
Well, the way I see it, if you look back at the religious wars of the early modern period, most high iq people now realize that those things were mostly over make-believe, but white people were all ready to massacre each other, be burned at the stake or burn at the stake over very slight doctrinal differences. Realizing in retrospect that all this was completely in their imagination, it seems to me that there’s this deep need to form a schism with the people around us and take up violent sectarian differences, over very subtle points. It stems from pride and competitive status structure with the people around us. We are locked in a very savage status competition with our coethnics.
Christianity is the most obvious source of things to anathematize each other about, and one might even think that was a big reason for injecting the goyim with it. My impression is the pagan world was fairly live and let live as far as other people’s religions went; Jan Assman talks about them recognizing each others’ gods and drawing up tables of correspondences — Jupiter is Zeus, etc. — and this made it easy to sign treaties and business agreements. OTOH, the Greeks thought everyone else were barbarians, etc. “More research” as the writers of the study Jim quotes would say, is needed here: are White folks naturally prone to creating social barriers over nothing at all?
I’m not sure that Christianity is so much the big bad bear that everybody around here seems to think. That idea that Christianity was some sort of Trojan horse or mind virus injected by the Jews in the ancient world to weaken Europe, goes back to Nietzsche’s genealogy of morals, right? But I think there are other interpretations. For example, I like Simone Weil’s opinion of Christianity that in fact, Christianity has more in common with stoicism and late pagan religion than with Judaism at all. I guess a lot of times homosexuals identify Christianity as the enemy, because of the Levitican prohibitions, I assume. But those are really stronger in the Old Testament than in the new. I think it’s pretty obvious that the historical Jesus as portrayed in the gospels was gay, just as Thecla and jone of arc were lesbians, but they just didn’t have words for that back then. I’m talking about subtle doctrinal differences within Christianity in my comment, however.
“I think it’s pretty obvious that the historical Jesus as portrayed in the gospels was gay”
Excuse me?
It’s “obvious” Jesus was gay? I’m going to need an example. An obvious one.
Jesus Christ was gay? You’re an idiot. No other way to put it.
If you could take off your heteronormative glasses for one minute, you’d realize that a man with high verbal iq, preaching universal love, who quit the carpentry trade was probably homosexual.
Heteronormative? Some of you guys are seriously mentally ill. But I guess it makes you giggle to write something dopey like that while you sit there dressed in all black with your mascara running and your long, greasy hair over your face. Kids like you are part of what keeps the White population from waking up. Who wants to be part of a movement with people like you?
Mark 10: 6-9
6 But from the beginning of creation, ‘God made them male and female.’ 7 ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, 8 and the two shall become one flesh.’ So they are no longer two but one flesh. 9 What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.”
Hold my beer…
Romans 1:26-28 ~ For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error. And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 – Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
1 Timothy 1:8-11 ESV – Now we know that the law is good, if one uses it lawfully, understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers, the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine, in accordance with the gospel of the glory of the blessed God with which I have been entrusted.
Yeah, there’s no shortage of anti-homo passages in the New Testament.
I’m not buying it. Maybe bi-curious.
I think you guys making the argument that Christianity, with its inherently sectarian tendencies (questions regarding the exact status of Jesus’s divinity, the meaning of the trinity, the vague exhortations to both obey and disobey rulers, etc.), is somehow uniquely appealing to whites, whose genetic and cultural makeup inclines them more to individuality and less to the group solidarity that is seen more readily in other races, making them more prone to arguing and hence fighting about fine points of religious doctrine, would do well to look at early Christianity—well before it got to the Romans, the Celts, the Germanic tribes, and so on. From the start, Christianity—even when it was merely another Oriental mystery cult—was inclined to division within its ranks. The differences only got greater as time went on: Nestorians, Monophysites, Chalcedonians, Non-Chalcedonians, Donatists, Pelagians, Arians, etc., etc. Hence the need for all those damn councils. Very few of these earliest Christians were white in the sense that we’d recognize. Yet they were splitting hairs and in some cases splitting heads all the same. And look at Islam! Right from the get go those desert nomad, hook nosed A-rabs were at each other’s throats about who would lead the Ummah after Mohammad died. That disagreement led to open war and to the splintering of the renegade cult into two intensely hostile sects with incompatible theological justifications for their respective pious frauds. And the last time I checked, both the original, asabiyya-loving, Arab practitioners of Mohammedanism and the overwhelming majority of that religion’s non-Arab devotees are as brown as the muddy desert sludge of a watering hole for camels.
Whites have the most internal diversity of any race. This is great for colorful high school cliques like goths, punks, jocks, nerds etc which sadly don’t seem to exist anymore, different eye colors, personalities, creativity, and talents. Its a weakness however in that lower homogeneity among us probably contributes to lower unity and constant infighting.
The albuminous substance that makes up the universe is also the defining characteristic of the white race. It can form into anything but it in itself it has no defining characteristic. Herein lies the essence of “whiteness”.
Wait— Mississippi is 39% Black and its prisons are only 62% Black?! Good for Mississippi Blacks— this is significantly under the national overrepresentation rate of Blacks in the criminal justice system.
Maybe it’s true what they say about Southern Blax being nicer.
“I can fix her!”
Certain names seem to be common with really crazy, trashy White girls and “Lexi” and “Jade” are two of them. I’m guessing the mom is not much better than her daughter.
I have to give it to Foolio for stupidest hair but, credit where credit is due, Coolio paved the way for it.
You can say that Coolio laid the groundwork for stupid hair. Foolio took that ball and ran with it.
Which doesn’t explain why the West was solidly Catholic from Constantine to Luther, nearly one thousand years of religious consensus.
The exception being Judaism, crushed like a bug in two major wars.
About as obvious as Caesar being a transgender furry, and exactly as evidence-based.
This kind of stupidity is applied to the Greeks and Romans as well. No, these people weren’t gay. Gay lifestyle is allowed by modern medicine. This idea that it was this widespread phenomenon is pure nonsense. Health issues that result from that sort of behavior are very real, but yea, let’s pretend the ancient world had something to deal with prolapse not to mention the filth and disease resulting from said behaviors. What a joke.
AIDS didn’t exist back then, and they did things that were much more unhygienic:
Romans used a sea sponge on a stick, called a tersorium, to wipe after using the latrine. Public latrines would have seen shared sponges, inevitably passing on diseases such as dysentery.
“Gay lifestyle is allowed by modern medicine.”
This was Gore Vidal’s opinion as well, or rather, that all kinds of non-reproductive sexual activities assumed modern standards of medicine as well as hygiene. “Deviancy” was not the result of moral decay but scientific and social progress.
Sometimes I think it is just as simple as white people being the only race with actual empathy. I think it’s missing in other races. And whitey has just too damn much of it. Case in point: you don’t see the brothers out there gluing themselves to highways. On the other hand, for those of us lacking melanin who believe in a good cause, we are willing to die for it. Maybe the far easterners come closest to us, but none of the others.
White people have far too much empathy which is brought about by following too literally some shyster preaching the self destructive belief system called christianity.
Don’t be kind and don’t be nice as most will view that as weakness.
Don’t be kind but don’t be cruel.
No, plenty of other POC are Christian, so that ain’t it. And calling Christ a shyster implies he got something out of it, like money. Tell me that part of the story. So far today he’s been gay, bi-curious, and now he scams money out of folks. Y’all must have a different Bible than I do.
I was referring to the Sunday shysters making money from the name of Christ not Christ himself. And then they have the nerve to tell the massed unwashed what to think at which time the massed unwashed have the nerve to believe the thieves.
Christ never grifted anyone out of so much as a penny but the amount of monies that have been successfully hoodwinked by the Sunday shysters is horrendously huge and used for all manner of nefarious purposes.
From other sources, I read that she was into “the occult”, spells, etc. so the ‘blackness’ referred to, was probably demonic in nature. When I was 16 years old, I remember seeing an ad in the back of a Rolling Stone mag: Become a Witch/Wiccan. Make spells! Gain Control. Just more snake oil for naive kids.
I bet if her mom had been married to her dad, this would not have occurred. Crazy “witches” are not tolerated in the home of strong men.
‘[I]f there’s a way to divide white people, it will be tried, and it will almost always succeed.’
This is one of those fundamental insights that virtually everyone on ‘our side’ would just as soon ignore…so they can go on hating other White people as a way of feeling superior to someone.
Every last White person I’ve met from Mississippi has been a solid. Maybe because they understand the nature of the black, they don’t fool around. People from Georgia and the Carolinas are always telling me how their best friend in high school was black.
100%. Good friends of ours, very wealthy and very race-conscious, sent their son to Ole Miss. I assure you this would not have happened if there was any risk to the boy. Kid came out stronger than ever. Had a great time, too.
Not in my part of “the Carolinas.”
Assuming here for the sake of argument that Jesus actually existed; we are talking about a guy that was arrested in a public park late at night while a naked boy that was with him made his escape. Maybe he really was out there helping him hunt for nightcrawlers for an upcoming fishing trip or working on the kid’s softball pitch (or whatever they did back then)… but I kinda doubt it. If you’re going to consider the bible as “evidence” than that alone is pretty “obvious”. There is also the matter of “the disciple whom Jesus loved” being singled out for special mention when he presumably loved them all. Equally obviously, one of them must’ve been pretty “special”. Condemnations of homosexuality are made by Paul, not Jesus. The example provided of Mark 10 is his answer when asked specifically about divorce.
Coolio was named after the Spanish ‘culo’ meaning ‘ass’.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment