The OverloadMark Gullick
A terrible signal.
Too weak to even recognize.
— Talking Heads, “The Overload”
The social democratic welfare state, founded on the myth of progress, will collapse just as surely as, but with a much louder crash than the Communist system. — Guillaume Faye, Convergence of Catastrophes
We have all seen the famous visual gag, in comic books or silent movies, in which we see a man up a tree astride a heavy bough. He is energetically sawing away at the branch, but is sitting on the wrong side of the cut. It’s all good fun and schadenfreude until you change the situation slightly and you, the observer, are no longer watching amused from a distance, but have somehow been duct-taped to a kitchen chair right underneath the sawyer and the weighty, creaking branch. Not quite so funny.
That is where we are with the globalist Left: them up the tree, us in the chair. It puts me in mind of an English nursery rhyme I used to hear as a very small boy, when left and right was still something I had printed on my shoes or mittens:
Rock-a-bye baby on the tree-top.
When the wind blows the cradle will rock.
When the bough breaks the cradle will fall.
And down will come baby, cradle and all.
What we mean politically by “the Right” and “the Left” in these strange and largely deluded times is a tale for another day, but I will use the terms here as what Jonathan Bowden called “intellectual shorthand.” They are heuristic terms which at least give us some guidance. We know roughly where we are, like a boy scout in a forest with a wobbly little compass and a smudged and frayed orienteering map. When I was a teenager in England, many ordinary people asked in the street would not really have known if they were Left-wing or Right-wing. They might have said they were Conservative or Labour, but that would be mere tribalism, like supporting your favorite football team. They would not have thought through the minutiae.
Now, it is somewhat different. There has been a good deal of political polarization and realization in my lifetime, and a certain amount of awareness has come along with it, largely due to the combination of the Internet and the resultant dissident journalism. The old-school media have even had to adjust to this now that their monopoly on opinionated editorial has gone, although that is their fault for letting insurrectionists like us in.
Politically speaking, this enlightenment may mean more division, but division is a good thing if it awakens the owl of Minerva and ordinary people begin to understand why they are divided, that division was necessary for a slightly grander scheme, one happening on the floors far above them. Despite this gradual dawning of awareness, however, we recall that the owl of Minerva flies at dusk. How much of the branch has our man already sawn through? How late is it?
To understand the polarity of Left and Right, we may also need better, retooled terminology (traditionally the Left’s grail) but essentially you know, or you should know, whether you are a creature of the political Left or the Right. To use a favorite term of progressive academics (and even that hair-gelled clown Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, who has started using it), we know who we are by “othering.” Do I believe — and have I thought it through — that anything the Left think is good actually is good? Nothing leaps to mind. Therefore, the Left are the “other” and I am a creature of the Right.
So we know that we are of the Right but we know it dialectically. We are adherents of the Right because we have seen the Left and we know instinctively as well as rationally that we are definitely not of that camp. We have therefore fled and encamped in the only other political space available. We know the tenets of conservatism, and view them as positives. We have also watched the predilections — and accompanying legislation — of the Left go essentially unchallenged this century, and we view these as negatives. Why, then, are we losing so dramatically? Why are we strapped to the chair beneath the sagging bough of the tree, there possibly just to break the fall of the maniac with the saw above us? Why is the overload inevitable, and why will we and our families suffer?
Partly, I think, because the Left have solidarity where the Right do not. It may be born out of fear rather than something more honorable, but lockstep marching has been achieved among our enemies. Watch how the Left deal with those who fall out of step. It used to be a sharp word or two on social media. Now, increasingly, it is professional suffocation. Uniformity of thought and opinion is both a mission statement of the Left and a book of the law.
Where the Left have solidarity and move in unison, like those schools of fish that all turn at the same time, the Right have no such thing. In what sense is there “a political Right”? It doesn’t really exist. The Right is a sectarian food-fight, a segregated canteen with different tables scowling at the others, postcode gangs carrying books instead of knives. I am undeniably Right-wing, but I get a lot of this on various sites: You can’t be Right-wing because you said something approving of a black man; you think trans people sometimes do need help; you don’t hate Jews as much as I do. You see it flung all over the landscape of the political Right like a mad woman’s excrement. And the longer this bitch-fight goes on, the closer we get to the overload. The branch won’t take too much more of the saw.
It seems that there is something coming, in the wonderful American phrase, down the pike — not a singular, world-changing event such as 9/11 or the Second World War; more like Guillaume Faye’s “convergence of catastrophes” whereby several different, though interlinked, disasters coincide with ruinous effect. From Faye’s book Convergence of Catastrophes: “A series of ‘dramatic lines’ are approaching one another and converging like a river’s tributaries with perfect accord (between 2010 and 2020) towards a breaking point and a descent into chaos.”
Written at the beginning of this century — already shaping up to be more dangerous than the last –this has the air of the Sibyl about it. All the elements are in place. Western economies are now showing the inevitable inflation caused by “quantitative easing,” aka printing money. There is an energy and a wheat supply problem due to the war in Ukraine, not to mention the dangerous possibilities of the war itself. America may not actually be in its second civil war, but it is doing an excellent impression of it. China is watching Taiwan like a heron watching a fish, waiting for the exact moment to strike. Governments have worked out how to implement the latest phase of societal wealth transfer in the form of green taxes and targets. Immigrants pour into the richest Western nations, making those countries poorer despite the protestations of globalists that this drain on financial and social capital is somehow essential. The revised list of converging catastrophes is not a short one.
The Western political complex has already pre-empted the potential of rebellion — both in thought and deed — by adopting a sort of caring, green authoritarianism as a harlequin’s coat, motley and the coat of the fool, as though they are guardians of a happy global village rigorously policed: Trudeau in Canada with the truckers, and the Dutch farmers. These are peasants’ revolts which the respective governments are keen to put down, and their globalist masters share their anxiety lest these protests spread. Nothing is more dangerous than powerful people who tell you that what they are doing is for the cause of something morally correct, appealing to ethical fortitude, and presenting it as the cross and banner of being on the right side of history. Grandstanding arias of climate change, or democracy, or trans rights, or any of the other absurdities with which Western leaders cloak their malevolence are essentially saying exactly the same thing to ordinary people. This is going to hurt, but it is good for you, as in the apocryphal army memorandum to commanding officers concerning their troops: Beatings will continue until morale improves.
But as I trawl the media, which I do every day, it is not just the broad-brush picture of Faye’s convergence theory that troubles me as regards the West’s immediate future, but the smaller incidents, the metapolitical bullying, and the encroaching use and consolidation of power in ever-decreasing, more “capillary” ways that point towards an overload. To return to our hapless man in the tree, the branch won’t break clean and fall. Instead, small cracks and fissures will multiply and extend until the terrible crash occurs. It will creak first, a terrible signal, too weak to even recognize.
Here is a grab-bag — a small selection from a cornucopia — of fissures and cracks, all of which will combine to produce the collapse, the falling bough, the overload:
- The British police are arresting thousands of people a year — many of whom go to jail — for comments made on social media. At the same time, some 95% of domestic burglaries in the United Kingdom go unsolved. Police will often not even visit a home that is burgled, providing only a “crime number” for insurance purposes.
- In America, many of the January 6 “insurrectionists” — actually guilty of nothing more than aggravated tourism — languish in jail while Soros-funded district attorneys spring felons with no bail, and they are straight back on the street.
- Back in the UK, gangs of Muslim pedophile rapists continue their conquests and the police are instructed to ignore their ethnicity, or even to look for suspects of other ethnicities, meaning white men. After a review of police competence during the so-called “Rotherham scandal,” not a single officer was even reprimanded.
- The American media almost entirely disregard the sordid antics and allegedly blatant moral and financial corruption of the President’s son (along with his laptop).
- China instructs the Associated Press (AP) to refer to Peking as Beijing — something I never do — and the AP say, “Yes, master!” Then, the AP tells their staff to capitalize the word “black” — again, you won’t find that in my writing unless it’s a surname — and they again parrot, “Yes, sir!”
- In Europe, the Netherlands – the second-largest global exporter of agriculture and its by-products — has seen protests over the government’s plan to slash nitrogen usage, which will force many farmers out of business. There have been protests akin to that of the Canadian truckers.
- In Germany, the Agriculture Minister has warned German farmers against any similar action. He has also advised the Germans to give up their traditional love of meat. He is a Turk.
- Biden is about to “forgive” student loans, meaning that the tuition fee for utterly worthless students reading utterly worthless degrees in utterly worthless “subjects” will be added to the taxpayers’ tab, like yet another weird and inexplicable service charge on your restaurant bill. The universities could care less. They will just up their fees, being now effectively a subsidized branch of government.
- In Britain, the BBC are committed to a quota system whereby 50% of their staff must be women. They are filling some of these posts with “trans women,” who are men who say they are women.
I know I needn’t go on, although if I felt you had a spare day or two I could. You are just as cognizant as I am of the undeniable fact that planet Earth may not be hurtling towards the precipice, but it is making steady, confident progress in that direction. All these little dots are beginning to join themselves, and the bough bends further still as the insane sawing continues above us.
Why the globalists, the elites, the political class, the Davos/World Economic Forum crowd, call them what you like — call them the Illuminati, if it makes you feel any better — are so intent on changing the entire globe into a malevolent Disneyworld is beyond me. I hold to my opinion that, once you are godless, games become more fun the bigger and more dangerous they are. George Soros will be dead soon, and I doubt he believes in an afterlife. He just wants to play the biggest game of checkers before he becomes dirt in the ground.
So the question remains: If the overload comes and the bough breaks and the cradle falls, will this have been intentional or a case of technocracy trying to ride various tigers at once and failing? Personally, I believe that the Great Reset is already here and not far from completion. They’ve gone full Bezmenov/Sam T. Francis. Never go full Bezmenov/Sam T. Francis. The World Economic Forum’s version is a Punch-and-Judy show, an off-Broadway production of the real thing, with entertaining, silly glove-puppets like Klaus Schwab to distract the media while the real action goes on out of sight.
Once again — as we must, like weary travelers — we return to Orwell, and his comment about England in “The Lion and the Unicorn,” that “England is a family with the wrong members in control.” Forget England; make that the world. The Left run the farm now, and we just have to hope there is a barn to hide in when the floods and locusts and droughts hit, as it seems they inevitably must. And, like the desperately-bound hero in an action movie, we might try getting rid of that duct tape, or even trying to inch the chair below out of the way.
Or we may have to take the hit.
The overload may well be necessary. The question is, can we survive it?
* * *
Like all journals of dissident ideas, Counter-Currents depends on the support of readers like you. Help us compete with the censors of the Left and the violent accelerationists of the Right with a donation today. (The easiest way to help is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.)
For other ways to donate, click here.
The Union Jackal, May 2023
The Worst Week Yet: May 21-27, 2023
George Friedman’s The Next 100 Years
George Floyd and the “Color” of Revolution
No Brexit This Way
Not Pretending to Be Anything: Charles Bukowski
The Burial of the Blarney Stone: Ireland’s New Hate Speech Legislation
Right vs. Left: What Does It All Mean?
Back in the UK, gangs of Muslim pedophile rapists continue their conquests and the police are instructed to ignore their ethnicity,…
The mischaracterization continues.
How does “Muslim” fit into this when according to your own sentence the police are instructed to ignore their ethnicity?
“Muslim” is not an ethnicity.
For the nth time, keep it ethnic/racial.
Don’t bring religion into this.
I’ve missed you.
How come we never hear of Hindu, Sikh, or Jain grooming gangs? Why is it always packs of Paks?
In fact Sikh girls were among those groomed! Nor were all the groomers of Pakistani extraction — some were ‘Albanian’ (i.e Kosovan) Muslims. The common denominator is most certainly sectarian: Muslim abusers, non-Muslim victims. And the extent of the abuse in almost every English town with a sizeable Muslim community is staggering. The mild and benevolent image of British Islam pretended by its adherents and constantly reinforced by the British establishment in schools and media has suffered irreversible damage through this scandal.
The common denominator is most certainly sectarian: Muslim abusers, non-Muslim victims.
Or it could be ethnically/tribally protected and organized abusers and ethnically/tribally unprotected, disintegrated, and vulnerable victims.
some were ‘Albanian’ (i.e Kosovan) Muslims.
Albanian gangster activity covers almost all of the European lands. They have powerful contacts within the anti-White continental politico-bureaucratic hierarchy. It also has alliances with White gangs. Pierre Morel’s Taken (2008) starring Liam Nesson approaches this subject in a relatively politically incorrect manner.
That these criminals happen to be Muslims is inconsequential. Albania host the terrorist “Mujahideen e Khalq” organization which has innocent Iranian Muslim blood on its hands. It usually takes assignments from Mossad to brutally target Iranian scientists and other civilians.
Lastly, as long as this conversation about the grooming gangs remains hostage to the Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon aka “Tommy Robinson” VS State-sponsored “Muslim community leader” context, it is a sheer waste of time.
Catchy phrases like “Muslim pedophile gangs” and “Muslim rape gangs” may attract attention and traffic (and some quick $$ of course) but it is intellectual dishonesty and laziness of the highest order. And those who perpetuate this practice to cash the anger and anxiety of the White communities are as disgusting and repulsive as those South Asian rapists and pedophiles.
When you’re constantly told that women who aren’t dressed in beekeeper suits are sluts and all your kinswomen are off limits ‘til marriage, it’s not surprising that IQ 85 Muslim men act like that. And given their Prophet’s predilection for 9 year olds, they feel emboldened to do what they want white girls.
A female acquaintance of mine (blonde hair, blue eyes) travelled in Egypt and, even though she was dressed modestly, she got a lot of unwanted attention. Luckily, she was with her husband, so she didn’t get the Lara Logan treatment.
Without Muslim immigration, aside from a handful of eccentrics like Abdullah Quilliam, Islam would find no traction in the West. The best thing the West and the Muslims can do is just leave each other alone.
…it’s not surprising that IQ 85 Muslim men act like that.
Neither their Muslimness nor their “IQ 85” made any contribution to their scandalous activities.
It is fallacious to conflate tribal/ancestral practices with Islam. The two should be seen separately.
Besides, degenerate filth can be found everywhere even in reportedly high IQ societies.
The high intelligence [whatever that means] club members, the Ashkenazim, have been molesting, raping, trafficking, exploiting, and preying on White women for decades [perhaps for centuries].
Another of the said club members, i.e. the Japanese, posted new records in conducting sexual slavery and exploitation. They even prostituted their own womenfolk to satiate the carnal urges of occupied US soldiers.
Koreans too deployed their womenfolk along the same lines. Warming American soldiers’ beds was a patriotic duty as it was augmenting the national income.
Indeed, these intellectually superior Northeasterners have been extremely imaginative and innovative in their profiteering from the body of the fairer sex.
Ever heard of the Japanese “satirical black comedy” The Rapeman?
I wonder how much sick and twisted a given society has to be before it produces crap like these.
A female acquaintance of mine (blonde hair, blue eyes) travelled in Egypt and, even though she was dressed modestly, she got a lot of unwanted attention. Luckily, she was with her husband, so she didn’t get the Lara Logan treatment.
Islam commands both men and women to always control their gaze and bear a dignified demeanor.
Shame on those Egyptians for flouting this command and behaving like animals.
9 year olds, dude…
As as someone ‘on the Right’, what is the Right selling that anyone not already ‘on the Right’ wants to buy? Throne and Altar? Women barefoot and pregnant and makin’ sammichs? Increased tax cuts? What?
What is see is a political inkblot that doesn’t rise to a ‘movement’ and that doesn’t care what the people it’s supposed to be concerned with actually want. It’s all about imposing some grandiose ‘order’ rather than delivering amelioration to the chaos in targeted, easy-to-digest packages of policy that ordinary people can say ‘Uh huh, yep, that seems good to me’. (This, by the way, is what some on the GOP, like Ron DeSantis, are experimenting with in order to keep White Nationalism at bay.)
What ‘barn’ did the Right ever build for ordinary people that would keep the locusts out?
What I see pretty consistently on the Right is (a) intimations of violence in the form of ‘There is no political solution’-ism and/or (b) waiting for a catastrophe that will restore things to the proper Mad Max post-apocalyptic neo-feudalist order that all the goons who spout (a) have been waiting for.
In certain ways, the actual living, breathing Right is more nihilistic than much of the Left and it should come as no surprise why ordinary, decent people – especially White people – run away from the Right whenever they get a chance.
Not having to support either ‘the Left’ or ‘the Right’ is one of the reasons why I’m a White Identity Nationalist. I just have to focus on what White people want and how to get it for them. Sure, some of those White people want to wallow in race-mixing and other such foulness. But bunches don’t. They just want to live nice, orderly lives with a little controlled excitement from time-to-time. And they don’t to be badgered about their race and they don’t want to see non-White criminals pampered and given 50 ‘second chances’. They want to be able to say ‘No’ to immigrants and other non-Whites invading their towns and neighborhoods.
In theory, ‘the Right’ should be able to articulate a politics of exclusion better than ‘the Left’ but that turns out not to be the case. Go figure. The Left has managed to make non-conforming Whites into pariahs.
The benefit of White Identity Nationalism is that it’s about White and non-White, not ‘Right’ and ‘not-Right’.
It always tickles me to see members of the dissident right salivate over the idea of winning so they can finally control what people wear, eat, listen to, watch, etc. and then in the same breath express a completely unironic bafflement over why our ideas haven’t gained more mainstream traction. If Amazon used that kind of packaging, they’d have gone out of business years ago.
One thing I never understood is how Murray Rothbard, a Libertarian hero and all Libertarians strongly endorse Free Trade, endorsed Pat Buchanan, a protectionist, for President in 1992. So this just shows that the Right is far from unified. We can’t even resolve the Free Trade/Protectionist issue. I go to Lew Rockwell almost every day and I never see this question clearly addressed.
Think outside the box.
‘..essentially.. you should know whether you’re a creature of the right or left’
Well. I don’t know. You tell me.
I’m opposed to mass immigration. I believe that all national groups deserve a homeland and cultural, economic and ethnic integrity.
I believe that tradition and culture are valuable, and that a genuinely diverse world is one in which different organic nations are free to choose their own path.
I think the greatest threat to European peoples is the capitalist economic system. I support greater ownership of the means of production by actual workers, either directly or through the state. I regard our current financial system as basically corrupt.
I dislike radical liberals and Ayn Rand libertarians equally.
Maybe Right and Left are outdated as political indicators, even as shorthand.
To quote Alain de Benoist;
‘Left? Right? That’s over.’
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Edit your comment