Counter-Currents
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 426 The Writers’ Bloc with Tuuku Kuru on the Russo-Ukrainian War
Counter-Currents Radio
117 words / 2:00:45
Tuuka Kuru, leader of the Sinimusta Liike political party in Finland and organizer of the Awakening series of conferences, was host Nick Jeelvy‘s guest on the latest episode of The Writers’ Bloc to discuss the Finnish perspective on the Russo-Ukrainian War, and it is now available for download and online listening.
Topics discussed include:
00:05:00 Mass immigration in Finland
00:17:00 The black and blue movement
00:20:00 Urho Kekkonen
00:31:00 Finlandization
00:36:00 Pro-Russians in the West
00:47:00 Finland, the happiest nation
00:52:00 The Russian invasion of Ukraine
00:59:00 Finland and NATO
01:13:00 The fall of America
01:25:00 What if Ukraine wins
01:30:00 Russian treatment of Eastern Europe
01:47:00 Jews and the war
To listen in a player, click here. To download, right-click the link and click “save as.”
* * *
Don’t forget to sign up for the weekly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Notice: Trying to get property 'ID' of non-object in /home/clients/030cab2428d341678e5f8c829463785d/sites/counter-currents.com/wp-content/themes/CC/php/helpers/custom_functions_all.php on line 164
2 comments
This was a great discussion. Some of my takeaways:
1 — NATO renders its members (unnaturally) dependent on US military power, and the US is in steep decline. Currently only Turkey & France have capacity for independent action, and France only because it did not return to NATO command until 2009 (De Gaulle pulled out in 1966)
2 — non-NATO country Finland, with a tiny population, has three times the artillery capability of Germany and an army of 300,000 (compared with Russia’s 500,000) — almost all Finnish men have seen military service, and many have received renewed training during this crisis
3 — the current crisis will reveal NATO to be completely ineffectual as a military force –>> the US cannot prevail against Russia in Eastern Europe and, knowing this, it will not intervene directly to save Ukraine –>> the US is an unreliable ally (would it defend the Baltic states? does it have capacity to do so?)
4 — European countries must therefore develop strong militaries of their own –>>they must band together to defend Europe against both Russia and migrant invasion
5 — it is an open question whether Europe should have a pan-European force under unified command or separate national armies that cooperate closely
6 — Europe must reach a new security agreement with Russia, even as it arms itself against Russia
7 — Russia, like the United States, is hostile to European nationalism and collective sovereignty of Europe
8 — Russian aims to “denazify” the Ukraine directly recall Soviet aims to “denazify” Finland during the 1939 Winter War
9 — even though Zelensky is a puppet of the US & globalist interests, many true nationalists hold positions of power in the Ukraine army and government –>> a Russian victory will mean certain death for many nationalists (by firing squad or otherwise) and the eradication of nationalism as an ideology, at least in the areas of Ukraine under Russian control
10 — this European nationalist perspective differs from the perspective of American nationalists, who tend to sympathize with Russia out of a reflex against their own media and government
Very useful and helpful points of view.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.