2,622 words
Brianna Kupfer was born in 1997, a year in which many of you reading this may have been older teenagers, fresh adults, or middle-aged. Maybe you were just getting started in putting your adult life in order by buying a home, getting married, or perhaps having your first child. With your life ahead of you, you may have felt optimistic. In the 1990s, it was still not that difficult to join the middle class, and the commanding heights of our society were nowhere near as anti-white as they are today — at least not openly.
Despite the decline in everything from social capital to upward economic mobility since 1997, Brianna Kupfer also likely looked forward to buying a home, getting married, and perhaps having babies. She will do none of those things now because she was murdered on January 13 by a black man who was free on $1,000 bail. He had been charged with three felonies in June which were then reduced, and he ended up getting nothing but probation. Since the murderer had likewise not been imprisoned for a litany of previous crimes, including firing a flare gun into a car carrying a young child, legal officials are therefore complicit in the murder of this 24-year-old girl. The murderer’s name is not worth printing here.
Brianna Kupfer’s slaughter was gut-wrenching. She had been working alone at a Los Angeles furniture store when the murderer came in at random, stabbing her to death for no apparent reason whatsoever, not even robbery. She died alone without her family or anyone else who might have been able to save her or even comfort her in her final moments.
Her death speaks to different tensions shaping pro-white identity politics today. These tensions are why white advocacy is growing in popularity, and why it may grow in unexpected places, given that our rulers have embraced vile forms of skullduggery to target whites in the post-George Floyd era.
Had I met Ms. Kupfer in real life and been forthright in my controversial views with her, she would likely have denounced me and perhaps would have tried to cancel me for my opinions on the future of white people in our countries. She was a young woman living in one of America’s most liberal cities and studying for a graduate degree at UCLA, after all. Her LinkedIn profile displayed a banner proclaiming “Stand for Justice” — and Counter-Currents readers know the top-down, anti-white understanding of “justice” today. I am not offended by this hypothesis, and I hope you are not, either. At the same time, it reveals an important truth: As White Nationalists, we are concerned about the future of our people even if many of them hate us.
This arrangement will prove transitory, however, and we are seeing why in real time. In a 2011 study, scientists at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute concluded that only one out of ten people in any given society need to have unwavering conviction in an ideology before it becomes mainstream and animates the population’s collective will. They illustrated this idea using networks wherein “true believers” in certain ideas could shift the opinions of the far more numerous “traditional view holders,” drastically changing their network’s ideological composition in short order. This mirrors an anecdote that Greg Johnson described as “making our ideas go viral.” One man dancing by himself at an outdoor concert in Washington state was seen as an eccentric — until the first follower joined him. This second dancer caused the dance to grow livelier. A third then felt obliged to join. Gradually, a massive dancing crowd formed around the lone “eccentric.” As White Nationalists, we are basically the first, second, and third people following the one who started it all. In other words, we are leaders — as Johnson argues — by legitimizing the lone dancer. By being leaders in legitimacy, we can make our ideas go “viral” as we approach that critical 10% threshold. We will then turn enemies among our people into friends.
This assertion is not some abstraction. Pretty much everyone reading this knows that pro-white identity politics have seen an explosive rise in the Western world since 2015. Anti-white academic Robert Pape, in coordination with the anti-white University of Chicago, concluded that those who entered the Capitol on January 6, 2021 largely came from counties where ethnic diversity had grown the most in recent years. 75% of the Capitol protestors believe in “the great replacement” of voters via immigration, a belief Pape of course derides as a “conspiracy theory.” Nevertheless, such thinking is proof of White Nationalism’s growing legitimacy among rank-and-file Republicans, as he admits.
A Morning Consult poll in the summer of 2021 found that 23% of Republican men had either a “very” or “somewhat” favorable view of White Nationalism. If we have not reached that coveted 10%, or if a sizeable crowd has not yet formed around the lone dancer, I would still say that we are close. We should not let hatred from our own people demoralize us in our efforts to build long-term, durable pro-white communities. Whites who hate us now will come around, and they will see the light in having a future in this country and across the white world.
An odious level of cynicism and nihilism is required to look at Brianna Kupfer and say that she deserved what happened to her, or that she does not deserve that much sympathy because of her support for causes like BLM. Not many — at least I hope — in the pro-white community think with such callousness. Those who do so fail to recognize the ephemeral nature of the societal crowd’s emotions. Passive participants are a permanent fixture in history. They cannot be blamed for succumbing to high-status beliefs which themselves can change if we act upon this historical moment. We must therefore see ourselves as elites in the most positive, enlightened sense of the word: as the first followers of the lone dancer. Our sophisticated level of understanding about the world can spark benevolent paternalism in order to protect and improve the lives of whites from every station of society, even those who do not currently hold our worldview such as Brianna Kupfer. This sense of duty will inspire us with the moral conviction necessary to reach that critical mass of 10%, conquer our enemies, and ensure that white victims of the current system like Brianna did not die in vain.
Brianna Kupfer’s story is also worth studying because the elite’s media, academic, and Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) sectors have zeroed in on white women for opprobrium, especially since 2020. Anti-white woman slurs such as “Karen” and “Becky” are now integral to the liberal vernacular as an in-group signifier. A black female editor of the Jeff Bezos-owned Washington Post, Karen Attiah, tweeted in June 2020 that “[w]hite women are lucky that we are just calling them ‘Karen’s’ [sic]. And not calling for revenge.”
Global Opnions Editor for WaPo pic.twitter.com/kyIyFeFMXT
— Jerry Dunleavy (@JerryDunleavy) June 29, 2020
Incidentally, she also blamed white women for inciting the 1921 Tulsa “race massacre,” which Gregory Hood has excellently debunked as a now-mainstream blood libel targeting whites. Attiah’s veiled threat of violence toward white women from an organ of elite institutional opinion-making took place in the context of the low-level civil war that was being waged in the summer of 2020. Insurance claims from riot-induced property damage totaled between $1 and $2 billion, all in the name of George Floyd. While covering up the violence, journalists also took the time to incite insane mob ire against white women, accusing them of weaponizing their vulnerability to terrorize black men. This condemnation of a demographic that largely supports the Left’s goals has put white women on the receiving end of an abusive relationship, as Robert Hampton points out. Indeed, young white women support Democrats over Republicans by a 16-point margin, and 54% of them think blacks are disenfranchised, according to the Public Religion Research Institute.
Social and evolutionary factors lead women in general to prioritize group harmony and the desires of others, whereas men strive for higher status through independent action. These differences could explain why the oligarchic, neoliberal cultural revolution has especially poisoned the minds of young women. Additionally, one’s brain does not fully mature until age 25, on average. Up until that point, young people are far more susceptible to emotional, impulsive thinking, which Leftist politics and smartphone addiction reinforce. At this stage, the prefrontal cortex, which allows for abstract, rational, and analytical thinking, is still developing. The fact remains that white women were morally expelled from the liberal-Leftist coalition in 2020 during one of the most violent periods in America’s history.
You can buy Greg Johnson’s White Identity Politics here.
Brianna Kupfer’s murder encapsulates the liberal elite’s elevation of blacks at the expense of previous concerns, such as women’s safety. Crime since 2020 has continued to reach record levels. Cities such as Brianna’s home of Los Angeles have defunded their police departments out of concern for “racial equity.” Our ruling elite — what Jonathan Bowden called “the Left-wing oligarchy” — is violently discarding its loyal supporters in the name of upholding anarcho-tyranny and pro-black identity politics. Moreover, the extremely limited media coverage of Brianna Kupfer’s murder relative to the deaths of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery indicates something even more sinister than merely an “abusive relationship” is taking shape. The Left-wing oligarchy is covering up the anti-white crimes it is enabling in the media under the veil of its superficial morality, whereby black criminals are celebrated while their victims are labeled as the root cause of violent dysfunction and prejudice in American society.
Out of a basic human sense of self-preservation and dignity, growing numbers of young white women may join the similarly growing numbers of young white men in trying to escape this vice-grip of demoralization that is a toxic combination of silent neglect and abuse. Those more familiar with psychological differences and different social incentive structures between men and women could inveigh against my prediction for being too optimistic. One must never forget, however, just how powerful and innate one’s will to live is, to the point where it emerges from the subconsciousness and opposes a seemingly all-powerful ruling class consensus.
Just before she died, Brianna texted a friend that her soon-to-be murderer was giving her a “bad vibe” after he entered the store. In that moment, she had discarded any concern with perceiving herself as racist out of the interests for her own safety. Her instinct was both correct and moral. In moments of life or death, the basic premises of White Nationalism — in-group preference and discerning trust between the familiar and unfamiliar — become profound components in human biology as luxury beliefs melt away. This truth returns us to my main point: the inevitability of White Nationalism, or, for the time being at least, the inevitability of “uppity white folks.” Either of these trends may be inevitable for a sizable percentage of a highly recalcitrant demographic: young white women.
To understand this existential new phase of our struggle, we must examine the implications of the ruling class and their mobocracy fervently worshipping blacks as infallible beings. In late 2021, a Florida jury refused to convict a black man, Dayonte Resiles, for killing a 59-year old white woman in a botched burglary from 2014. Despite most of the jurors agreeing that he was guilty of at least second-degree murder, and even though Resiles had earlier escaped from a courtroom and tried to flee his trial, three jurors refused to convict him for murder, saying, “I don’t want to send a young black male to jail for the rest of his life or have him get the death sentence.” They apparently had no pity or consideration for the murdered woman and her family.
In a disturbing echo of this injustice, prosecutors did not convict Kenyan immigrant Billy Chemirmir after a deadlocked 11-1 jury failed to find him guilty of murdering 18 elderly women in Texas nursing homes. Police suspect he has killed an even larger number than that. In the name of “racial equity,” everyone from antifa activists to establishment prosecutors are acting against the “mass incarceration” of non-whites, particularly blacks, by freeing as many of them as possible on bail. This obviously has horrific consequences for whites. As Media2Rise has documented, anti-white Jewish activists and billionaires like George Soros have created what are essentially terroristic initiatives disguised as NGOs to funnel massive amounts of capital to free prisoners on bail, ensuring that they are back on the streets so that they can terrorize innocents such as Brianna Kupfer. Such organizations include Measures for Justice, the Minnesota Freedom Fund, and The Bail Project. Activists have openly admitted that they do not care at all about the criminal records of those they release. Their allies are district attorneys with blood on their hands such as John Chisholm of Milwaukee. In his career, he has gotten 65% of felons off with either no or light bail, including Darrell Brooks, who went on to murder six white people at a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin. What we are seeing is a conspiracy of elite capital and a media-induced, anti-white mob mentality to ensure that as much pain and suffering is inflicted on whites as possible (even though, of course, all law-abiding citizens suffer from this, whether they are white or not).
In this new, evil system upheld by the richest, most powerful people in the world, I shudder to think whether Brianna Kupfer’s family will receive any justice in the murderer’s upcoming trial. In an ideal world, true justice would see the killer receiving the death penalty. We must not dismiss the haunting possibility that a guilty verdict itself may be too much to ask of this tyranny. Since 2020, the anti-white mandarins of the judicial system, academia, media, and NGOs have escalated a vicious war, targeting white people physically, psychologically, and morally. Rendering the murder of whites by non-whites an easy and unpunished offense is a provocative next step in the ongoing Great Replacement and genocide of the white race. The trial of Brianna Kupfer’s murderer could help complete that hideous next step. Loathsome outfits like Measures for Justice, The Bail Project, and prosecutor’s offices around the country embody it. As whites, we must organize on the metapolitical and community levels to ensure that they fail and are brought to justice under a new political order.
In our current political order, scoundrels ranging from journalists to tenured university professors are transforming the judicial system into an anti-white revolutionary tribunal while abolishing all semblance of public safety. This is unacceptable. Beyond arguments for racial self-interest, anyone who has basic expectations of living peacefully within his civilization cannot tolerate a criminal overclass colluding with a criminal underclass to unleash horrors upon ordinary people. This new escalation of pressure against American whites in particular — who suffered 36 homicides by non-whites in January of this year alone — will undoubtedly increase the appeal of white identity politics.
We despair when we read stories about wonderful people like Brianna Kupfer being murdered by racial outsiders, and by extension by an illegitimate ruling class. However, I would not miss for the world the opportunity to be alive today as a white man in a time when growing numbers of white people throughout the West are losing their moral qualms about advocating for their own destiny. The plutocratic system has become so tyrannical that even those we least suspect may soon be ready to listen to what we have to offer.
Let us resolve to make the 2020s the decade of the White Spring. We understand the stakes in the battle before us. May Brianna Kupfer’s life and memory inspire us at Counter-Currents and in the wider movement to collectively spread our message with renewed courage and dedication. Rest easy, Brianna. I cannot say the same to our anti-white foes.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
30 comments
I know there is inconsistency here in naming Brooks but not Brianna Kupfer’s murderer. I figured that Brooks was already so infamous-thanks in part due to the Media2Rise documentary I cited-that leaving him nameless would not work. On the other hand, Kupfer’s murderer was obscure in comparison, and I did not want to give him the privilege of being named and further known. Also, I found it difficult and awkward to write this without naming any of the criminals who have done horrific things against white people. I am not trying to minimize the anti-white massacre in Waukesha in the interest of focusing this essay on Brianna Kupfer’s murder. Perhaps a good writer should not have to explain his craft, and let the work speak for itself, but there you have it.
That essay was very forceful. Being a white nationalist and counter currents subscriber is what I am most proud of in my life!
“Being a white nationalist and counter currents subscriber is what I am most proud of in my life!”
Whites with good attitudes like this will help to bring about a White Spring.
Whatever we are proud of doing for our race, first we should be proud of being committed to the moral pro-White tribe.
If you search for Brianna Kupfer online, not only the perpetrator’s name but his photo will come up. There are truly criminally insane people on this earth, and he is one of them. How is it that our criminal system does not immediately ‘tag’ them in some way. How do the preliminary courts who see them first to set bail not recognize immediately this person is way ‘off base’. I guess it is because the whole mechanism, from arresting officer to court judge is so cornered by the threat of ‘racism’ themselves that they play along with ‘the system’, probably for fear of losing their job. So, we need to keep publishing as many of these crimes right along to keep this still unknown threat against all of us out in the open.
Thanks for posting — it’s a part of Brianna’s Elegy.
This is a moving essay. Thank you for writing it. To me, just the fact that for decades, haters of the USA and haters of the White race have been plotting the best ways to destroy THE best systems in the world, fills me with a deep anger. This essay helps me better understand why it is happening. The use of Lawfare has been devastating. I don’t even think Lawfare is a correct term as it is not law that is being done, but rather the evilness occurs within the framework of law, using every trick and small loophole to craft an outcome, justice be damned. Brianna Kupfer is an excellent example of this whole nigjtmare of a world can come crashing down on any one of us. You work your job, a black who has no business being free comes in, you feel uneasy (but you know that if you act on that unease you’ll be the criminal), yet rather than act on your unease you allow the black to come closer. Mayne you’ve been wrong. Maybe black people are our betters and the fetishization of them on TV and lionization of them everywhere is right. Your guard drops a bit as you sense how good it feels to be one of the beautiful people, not a believer in all races being equal, but a believer in the true religion of black supremacy. How peaceful this new feeling is, how warm you feel. And then your physical self reacts violently, the warm feeling is your own blood and it is the devil standing over you with dour, dead eyes, looking at the bug he just smashed.
In the same spirit of this article, I’d like to submit a similar case that many of you know. In January 2021, a black man, a gun and drug criminal was released from jail early. You can guess why. On February 9, while staying with his aunt and uncle, he went next door to a White woman’s house. He stabbed her to death, cut out her heart, and returned home to aunt and uncle’s house. Once home, he cooked the White woman’s heart with potatos (as one does normally), and fed it to his aunt, uncle, and their 4-year old granddaughter, who maybe was his niece. At some point during that same day, he stabbed his uncle, the grandaughter, and stabbed his aunt in both eyes. She survived but uncle and grandaughter died.
How did this not make national news? This makes kneeling on a drug addict’s neck pale by comparison. He cut out her heart! And cooked it! Where’s our summer of justice? Where’s our demands that blacks take the knee in support of this innocent White woman? Why is this not used to demand reparations from murderous blacks based on decades of FBI data?
While I need to update myself on the upcoming trial, I fear that just as was done in The Knoxville Horror, lawfare will be used to amplify the black villain as the true victim and paint this poor woman as the real criminal, who must have spent her whole privileged life at the expense of blacks.
Why must Whites bleed, suffer, and die just so blacks can live?
To one of the points of this article, the law is being horribly abused. The once fair system of a jury of our peers is becoming increasingly unjust. Peers meant people, good citizens, who ALL wanted the constitution to be followed, who love their communities and want them to be safe. No longer. The centuries of social trust, the belief that we all want what’s best for everyone are eroding. Tribal preservation is what’s being practiced by everyone but Whites. Doug Huntington makes a great case as to why that is happening.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9294833/Oklahoma-triple-murder-suspect-cut-neighbors-heart-COOKED-it.html
Thank you very much, ShadowPal. I am glad you are moved. That was one of my main goals in writing this essay. You describe the vivid horror of black on white crime-and what Brianna Kupfer’s final moments could have been like- down to a t. As for the Oklahoma example, that murderer had his sentence commuted by a Republican governor, Kevin Stitt, before he went out on that repulsive rampage. I remember also being deeply disturbed upon first hearing about that. Both Republicans and Democrats are waging war on whites. The Democrats are honest in openly stated their anti-white goals. The Republicans whisper sweet nothings into your ear while slowly sticking the knife in your back. We need to organize around ourselves and destroy this two party system which has been fooling whites for generations as their country steadily gets worse and worse every year. I am confident we will ultimately be successful.
Thank you Doug, for taking the time to consider our comments and then reply. I agree completely about the Democrats and Republicans. There’s a lot of hopefulness and outright glee that the Republicans will score big wins this fall. Nope, because I don’t think a big lesson was learned by President Trump’s “loss.” Democrats did cheat, Time magazine admitted it and the systems are in place to repeat it in perpetuity. Any vote cheating systems that need shoring up are being strengthened now. As much as people think Democrats opposed President Trump, it goes so much deeper than him. He did expose their absolute hate and corruption but couldn’t root it out (drain the swamp). Because he exposed them, they hate him and went into hyperdrive to prove him a villain. But it was more a message to ANY honest person seeking to enter politics. That message is this: it’s our government, we run things our way, and we will destroy you for trying to change a single thing. In addition, the people who inhabit this country are stupid, we are wise, and we will decide what’s best.
Let’s suppose Republicans do win. To your point about Republicans sticking the knife in your back, the Republicans will do nothing, despite having majorites in the House and Senate. They don’t have the stomach to go full tyrant like the Democrats can do without a second thought. They won’t go after Schiff or Hillary or Pelosi for their deeds. They won’t go after Mayorkas for his willful destruction of our border. They won’t go after biden for Afghanistan or his obviously corrupt son. They can’t, they won’t, and they’ll blow it and lose whatever power they’ve been given by a desperate population who’s suffered under a year and a three quarters of biden by the time elections roll around. Another negative is that Republicans should’ve been aware of the legions of drones in the State and Justice departments who slow walked President Trump’s agenda items and derailed his efforts. Government doesn’t work anymore, it hasn’t for a long time. Any honest person who decides to go to Washington, DC to try and implement ideas to help his fellow citizens will be destroyed. That’s the lesson I learned from President Trump’s experience. Thanks again for your article. I look forward to many more. PS I very much liked seeing the smiling White woman at the end of your article. There is a growing amount of websites that show White beauty, both the people and their beautiful creations, both buildings and babies.
The picture of this beautiful young woman reminds me of the picture of a smiling beautiful Kate Steinle. The emotional response to these crimes is very intense. Thank you for this clear and insightful essay on why their deaths must never be forgotten.
Thank you for the compliment, Christopher. I completely agree, the emotional response is intense. I myself was actually reminded of the photo you brought up when I used the one I did to close out this essay. Brianna Kupfer and Kate Steinle will never be forgotten. Their memory, as well as those of the countless other white victims of non-white crimes post-1965, must live on if we are to succeed in ensuring whites have a future in North America.
Will enough whites wake up to this? How many times has something like this happened and the family members had to explain that they aren’t racist or that they favor immigration when an illegal kills one of their children. Whites and white women in particular are being conditioned by academia, Hollywood, and the media to ignore their protective instincts in favor of sensitivity.
I was not enthusiastic about reading another blackpill-horror-show-outrage-of-the-week essay. Which is, sadly, what I think is coming every time I see the photo of one of our own who I know was murdered by one of The Others. But I’ve very glad I decided to do so because this is fine essay.
An odious level of cynicism and nihilism is required to look at Brianna Kupfer and say that she deserved what happened to her, or that she does not deserve that much sympathy because of her support for causes like BLM. Not many — at least I hope — in the pro-white community think with such callousness.
That you have to mention it means you know it happens. I decided a while back that there is no White person who does not deserve the opportunity to live in peace and security even if they’ve positioned themselves in alliance with our racial enemies. Call it White Ecumen. To err is human, to forgive those who are truly repentant has to be at the heart of any White Spring. One thing Whites will have to do is root out the inclination to a kind of sadism when it comes responding to bad things happening to Whites who (temporarily) picked the wrong side in this race war.
Occupying the moral high ground on the matter of ‘race traitors’ costs almost nothing politically and yet takes the wind out of the moral posturing of our enemies who are White and Jewish.
[A]nyone who has basic expectations of living peacefully within his civilization cannot tolerate a criminal overclass colluding with a criminal underclass to unleash horrors upon ordinary people.
(((David Cole))) has referred to the overclass/underclass collusion as an attack on the ‘livability’. This is a good – neutral – way to look at the problem. But, of course, Whites are hit hardest by the loss of livability because we did not evolve to live in chaos and squalor.
https://www.takimag.com/article/spicy-white-and-urban-blight/
The idea of an underclass/overclass alliance against Middle America has been in conversation since the 70s, and true for even longer.
_____________________________________________________
{An odious level of cynicism and nihilism is required to look at Brianna Kupfer and say that she deserved what happened to her, or that she does not deserve that much sympathy because of her support for causes like BLM. Not many — at least I hope — in the pro-white community think with such callousness. -DH}
That you have to mention it means you know it happens. I decided a while back that there is no White person who does not deserve the opportunity to live in peace and security even if they’ve positioned themselves in alliance with our racial enemies. Call it White Ecumen. To err is human, to forgive those who are truly repentant has to be at the heart of any White Spring. One thing Whites will have to do is root out the inclination to a kind of sadism when it comes responding to bad things happening to Whites who (temporarily) picked the wrong side in this race war. -Hamburger Today
_____________________________________________________
Hold on a long second. No person deserves to be murdered for a political belief with no action. I’m not happy that an innocent young person should die at the hand of a sociopath – and especially not when the innocent is white, and the sociopath black.
But if this pretty young girl was actually a rabid BLM supporter (and I have no idea about that; does anyone? does STAND FOR JUSTICE = BLM? it could just be some generic virtue-signaling instance of performative conformity) abso-freakin-lutely that changes the calculus of my sympathy for her (it would in no way lessen my outrage at the criminal savage who did this, and who must be executed). Sympathy is not a limitless emotion. And “war” does not just involve what Putin is doing today in Ukraine (ie, invading with tanks and APCs, and lobbing artillery shells). “War” can also mean “laying the foundations for a people’s future enslavement and genocide.”
Our people are under vicious attack from many quarters; indeed, we are unilateral non-combatants in a race war being waged against us. For a member of our team – the product of a million years of racially differential evolution which has made her a member of the morally best as well as most historically accomplished of races – to turn her back on her own excellent tribe is to betray not only her (admittedly unchosen) team, but the very path (perhaps divinely intended) of the evolutionary progress of mankind. Whites as a civilization are the closest to the City of God (I’m not saying I’m a theist -nor am I an atheist – merely that whites as a group are closer to meeting the Christian ideal of virtuous behavior than other races, considered in their respective entireties), even if we’re a particularly low point now (behaviorally as well as racially). To betray the white race’s morally legitimate interests in order to advance another race’s morally illegitimate power drives is despicable.
Without accompanying evil action (like firebombing a courthouse, physically battering a conservative, or doxxing and financially destroying the life of a patriot), such an attitude of disrespect and ingratitude for our awesome heritage shouldn’t constitute a death sentence, obviously. But it most certainly does, as a matter of modal moral psychology, lessen what sympathy an oppressed and awakened white can be expected to muster up on her behalf. I hope she didn’t have any BLM activism in her past.
Moreover, where are all these SJWs and antifa monsters who are now showing any “true repentance”? Nearly all sadism today is found on the left. The left attracts the wicked (it always has, too). Those who then ally themselves to the wicked demonstrate at best weak characters; at worst, a proclivity to future evil. We should be very wary of such types. This isn’t the 1950s or 60s, when being a race-liberal was understandable (if still not excusable; my family wasn’t liberal any more than it was white supremacist; just solid conservatives and patriots). To be white and pro-BLM today is to be guilty of something, at the least, very willful, deliberate ignorance, not just about BLM, but the facts of race in the US.
My comments about repentance and forgiveness are forward-looking and about the message we should be sending to errant Whites as part of our larger program to win hearts and minds. Wokeism is a religion and we need to counter it with the same methods that religions use to encourage a return to the church by those who have strayed.
As for all sadism being on ‘the Left’, I don’t agree. There’s plenty of sadism on the Right, but (a) ‘the Left actually has power and (b) if you agree with the targets of Right sadism (like White Wokies, White liberals in general) its easy to overlook it.
As for the ‘war’ ideation, there’s some truth to it but it shouldn’t be overused. Our work is primarily persuasive, winning hearts and minds. Until we can get a greater share of North American Whites to admit to their preference for White life and White order, we have to craft messages that encourage them to do so.
I genuinely believe that pro-White politics must include the position that we can forgive and forget most anti-White behavior by Whites. It is the morally correct and politically efficacious position to take. It removes an obvious point of attack from our enemies and can help lower the resistance of some White folks who are sitting on the fence with regarding to embracing White Identity. If we’re the nice folks, the forgiving folks, the loving and nurturing folks, that’s going to make it easier for some White folks to come home to their people even when they may have embraced some anti-White sentiments in the past.
I salute you for writing this excellent memorial to a young woman whose life and dreams were cut short. All too often, people like this are forgotten way too soon. I’m sure your average, sick, leftist defund the police type, doesn’t even think about this or care for a single second. Again, thank you.
It’s been nearly fifty years since the Zebra killings and the Hi-Fi murders. In the intervening time, how many interracial murders and rapes have happened? This incident also reminds me the horrendous 2011 lululemon bethesda murder. Whites need to break out of our stockholm syndrome if we want to preserve islands of stability in this country.
Stockholm Syndrome is apt, but I have also noticed it is an odd marking of status, as well. I work with wealthy people, and in the good old days the wealthy had the code of the language of good breeding. Today, being the first in the group to mention BIPOC and their pitiful plight is the nod of only the “best.” I’m sure they tip their housekeepers well, just not well enough to live nearby.
Well first off, let me wish everyone a happy Ahmaud Arbery Day.
“Georgia marks statewide ‘Ahmaud Arbery Day’ to honor the slain jogger”
NPR
The current harvest of “active Black Men” has been 20 years in the making. These are the product of increased welfare targeting the lower IQ segments of the Black population. The resulting surfeit of chillins, coupled with a greatly decreased parental discipline has resulted in the current crop of “Active Young Joggers”.
The next generation shall be even more Joggers but raised up with a need of retribution for injuries done to them plus a sense of the weakening grip of law and the feeling of rising anarchy in the non-U, S of A.
I don’t think renewed police budgets will be able to counter it. Should be interesting times.
Once again, Happy Ahmaud Arbery Day to all here.
As unintelligent as their race is, even they must recognize they are now untouchable. Until all bets are off. And when that occurs I hope their handlers are remembered, too.
They have animal instincts though. Much like naughty children they sense when authority is not looking or permissive. I wouldn’t call it intelligence. It’s more of a social skill. All social animals have it.
Yes, sadly I know. At the gym I see really nice fit white women working out. A fat, Black guy, who has zero build and obviously never works out, walks up to them. After a minute or so, they both began having an animated conversation and she starts laughing and is obviously very pleased with his company. They seem to have an easy-going talent for certain instincts.
I believe a lot of the younger or more active or daring ones realize that they’re becoming untouchable. This is a whole generation also endowed with relaxed discipline, a sense of aggravation, and lower intelligence.
Even were police forces to remain the same this would present a large problem going forward. AmRen has a new article where JT discusses dropping morale and increasing resignations from police forces across the country.
“Those who do so fail to recognize the ephemeral nature of the societal crowd’s emotions. Passive participants are a permanent fixture in history. They cannot be blamed for succumbing to high-status beliefs which themselves can change if we act upon this historical moment”
This gets at an important question which I’ve seen a lot of disagreement about, with the divide naturally falling between those of a Left Wing vs. Right Wing persuasion: At what point does personal responsibility come into play?
A big part of being a Leftist is to assume that people are collectively shaped by societal forces, or by the actions of their “Elite.” For example, an anti-racist Leftist would argue that Blacks only act the way they do because they’ve been disenfranchised and marginalized by a “White Supremacist” society. If they were treated with dignity, they wouldn’t commit crimes and wouldn’t be disproportionately poor.
Similar arguments are made by Racist Leftists in regards to the White Underclass (as they call it, the “White Working Class”; which is a lie btw, as there is a massive difference between a factory worker and a deadbeat drug addict): They only act that way because “White Elites” failed to guide them and give them a proper culture.
I don’t think I have to elaborate on the position taken by Right Wingers, as it should be intimately familiar to all of us in these spaces. Suffice to say, while I acknowledge there are certain systemic factors that have made life harder for Whites who are poor, I’m honestly a strong believer in the doctrine of personal responsibility, as it has served me well throughout my adult life.
It may be too cynical to argue that a BLM supporter like Brianna Kupfer “had it coming,” but I don’t think we should just assume that she didn’t have any personal responsibility for her beliefs. Lets skip the debate about whether people are lemmings or not and get to the real issue: Shouldn’t we be striving to create a society where the norm is people independently thinking for themselves? Wouldn’t we be immune against media propaganda, academic indoctrination, and all other forms of Jewish poison if our people were all a bunch of self-thinking philosopher kings? (and queens!)
I get the argument that people shouldn’t be crucified for being lemmings, but I think its equally foolish to just pretend they can’t or shouldn’t be more then that. Long term, if we survive this 20th and 21st century assault, we’re just going to be in the same situation again if we don’t adapt and evolve. The nihilist in me says “we’ll all be dead by then anyway,” but the pride in me overrides that and says “uh uh, we need to change NOW so that we never have to worry about this shit ever again.”
What do you think is the line between guiding our people and letting them be responsible for their own actions and beliefs?
It may be too cynical to argue that a BLM supporter like Brianna Kupfer “had it coming,”
How very charitable of you to concede that.
but I don’t think we should just assume that she didn’t have any personal responsibility for her beliefs.
That is exactly what we should assume. Young White women are disproportionately affected by leftist academic indoctrination because the fields of study they pursue are more susceptible to subversion. It is going to take time for that to wear off. We don’t need White “advocates” who maintain that the vast majority of White women under twenty-five deserve to be snuffed out. The very fact that this even needs to be said reflects a very serious and potentially fatal sickness in White people: the tendency to viciously turn on each other. Non-whites don’t sit around and argue about whether they should be angry when one of their own is murdered by an outgroup.
Lets skip the debate about whether people are lemmings or not and get to the real issue: Shouldn’t we be striving to create a society where the norm is people independently thinking for themselves?
No, we can’t skip the debate about whether people are lemmings, because it goes to the very feasibility of the project you propose.
Wouldn’t we be immune against media propaganda, academic indoctrination, and all other forms of Jewish poison if our people were all a bunch of self-thinking philosopher kings? (and queens!
That is never going to happen, and I’m not sure it would be a good thing in any event. The lesson to be learned is that spineless caving to demanding minorities leads to ruin. We would never have come to this point if Whites weren’t going along with leftist speech codes that progressively narrowed our range of thought and action until, as now, no meaningful dissent is permitted.
If you’re going to be sarcastic and not discuss the points I raised in good faith, then it’s fair for me to retvrn the favor. Lets go.
“Young White women are disproportionately affected by leftist academic indoctrination because the fields of study they pursue are more susceptible to subversion.”
Is this supposed to make me feel sorry? Because it doesn’t. You might be surprised to know I was raised to treat men and women equally, and although I acknowledge the biological differences between us, frankly, old habits die hard. The way I see it, we can go one of two ways here:
1. Men and women are equal, in which case, men and women must be held equally responsible for their susceptibility to indoctrination. I’m as hard on White men as I am on women on this issue, and it’s only because of your previous battles with (legitimately) misogynistic men in these spaces that you assumed I was attacking Brianna Kupfer as a woman. White men have become meek, agreeable cowards, and they are just as responsible for buying into anti-white, leftist bullshit as she is.
2. Men and women are not equal, in which case, all the talking points misogynists in the movement love to make about the need to protect women by keeping them out of college and the workforce are applicable. If women are uniquely susceptible, then they need to be uniquely protected.
You and I both reject scenario 2, but you’re not prepared to handle the consequences of scenario 1. Its either your BS worldview about lemmings and their lack of responsibility goes out the window, which requires you to swallow your pride, or you admit that White adults such as Brianna Kupfer maybe should have reconsidered whether the BLM talking points they were spewing had any potential negative blowblack.
“We don’t need White “advocates” who maintain that the vast majority of White women under twenty-five deserve to be snuffed out.”
Again, you’re talking to a gender egalitarian raised in Evangelical Christian circles. Its not just White women, its spineless White men. I get that you’re jaded from conversations with men in this movement who make sadistic comments about rape and subjugation, but no, my angle here isn’t to “get” White women like Brianna. Its to force Whites like her to grow up. Those “bad vibes” she got in the text message to her friend should have been the instincts she listened to all along. She would still be alive if she did.
“The very fact that this even needs to be said reflects a very serious and potentially fatal sickness in White people: the tendency to viciously turn on each other.”
Nordic Chad: Yes
We turn on each other because we see each other as immoral. Sometimes, we even see each other as evil. And today, that Good vs. Evil divide takes place between Social Conservatives and Social Liberals. Values are what deeply divides the White Race. Social Liberals see Social Conservatives as evil, and the feeling is mutual. It is what it is. I for one welcome it and embrace it. I wish to see my values reign supreme over the Earth.
“Non-whites don’t sit around and argue about whether they should be angry when one of their own is murdered by an outgroup.”
That’s because Whites have a moral compass. It’s what makes us who we are. I like it.
“No, we can’t skip the debate about whether people are lemmings, because it goes to the very feasibility of the project you propose.”
Hence why I phrased it the way I did. If regular White people are not lemmings, then obviously my independent thinker proposal is both feasible and desirable. But even if regular White people *are* lemmings, then instead of accepting that, we should try to change them into independent thinkers and philosopher kings that way its impossible for them to be indoctrinated and deceived ever again. That project may take decades or even centuries, but its worth it.
“That is never going to happen, and I’m not sure it would be a good thing in any event.”
I’m highlighting and bolding this part because it reveals what I suspected all along about RadFems and Social Liberals such as yourself: You guys are vicious tyrants who need the regular population to be compliant and submissive that way you can lord it over them and foist all sorts of cruel policies on them, whether that’s lockdowns and vaccine mandates, or whether its feminism and the break up of the family (yeah, I’m going there).
The reason why spoiled women such as yourself are subject to sadistic comments – ironic or unironic – is largely because you’ve gone off the rails and act as if the world exists to serve you. I’ve seen your interactions with the boys on here, and I have zero sympathy. You made your cake. Time to eat it.
“We would never have come to this point if Whites weren’t going along with leftist speech codes”
A powerful argument can that Whites allowed that to happen. Are we so devoid of agency and will that we let ourselves be deceived in such a transparent manner?
Good comment. Ultimately, as I keep arguing here at CC, white liberalism is a phenotypal expression of an underlying evolutionary defect unique to whites (as far as I can tell); or we could say that whites are by light years the race which most evinces this defect. I used to wonder all the time back in the 80s – “why is it only whites who ever agonize over racism”? “Why is it only whites who place the ILLEGITIMATE interests of other races ahead of the legitimate interests of their own people?” After a while I just realized that whites are evolution’s outliers. First, we are the morally best (most ethically universalist) race. Second, however, many of our people go beyond proper assessment of individual character to a point of real morality-denying ethnomasochism. There is a bizarre strain in the white mind which actually finds moral virtue in extreme racial-self-abnegation – that indeed sees such behavior as the highest form of virtue (I believe in absolute moral values discoverable by reason, and I certainly think such a woke white view of ethics is asinine).
My point for this is a simple and practical one: we must separate from such evolutionary defectives (ie, white race traitors). We need “white nationalist nationalism”. We are the ones, and the only ones, we will save – the gene lines of those whites who are not ethnomasochists. Without separating ourselves from the race disloyalists (again, of those lines of genetic configuration which predispose their white bodies to group disloyalty as described above), eventually, even in the Ethnostate, this genetic tendency to pathological altruism and self-abnegation will reawaken, once the early years of the racial crisis and the founding and securing of the Ethnostate are past. We have to be the first generation of whites who thinks seriously about the future survival prospects of our descendants.
You know, you tell me that you were raised to be an egalitarian, and you still believe in equal treatment, but your extreme vitriol towards me gives the lie to this claim.
I’m as hard on White men as I am on women
I see. So it’s not just the majority of young White women you believe deserve to be murdered, but a large percentage of White men, too.
You and I both reject scenario 2, but you’re not prepared to handle the consequences of scenario 1. Its either your BS worldview about lemmings and their lack of responsibility goes out the window, which requires you to swallow your pride, or you admit that White adults such as Brianna Kupfer maybe should have reconsidered whether the BLM talking points they were spewing had any potential negative blowblack.
Few things in this world are more insufferable than a know-it-all with an inflated view of their own intelligence. Before you get on your high horse, you might consider taking the time to actually read the comment you are responding to. I wrote:
Young White women are disproportionately affected by leftist academic indoctrination because the fields of study they pursue are more susceptible to subversion.
I said nothing whatsoever about young women being particularly susceptible to indoctrination. Rather, they are particularly susceptible to the kind of indoctrination that is going on in the humanities, social sciences, and helping professions programs because most college students are women and these are the things they are most likely to study!
Young men are every bit as susceptible to indoctrination as women, though they are more likely to embrace equally-corrosive libertarianism than egalitarianism. The overwhelmingly male WASP establishment sold the country out for cheap labor and quick profits because “free trade” and muh GDP. As the author of this article pointed out, men “strive for higher status through independent action.” Look how that has worked out for us! Then, of course, there is the tendency among men to fall for the very worst sort of propaganda: the kind that impels you to slaughter each other by the tens of millions.
We turn on each other because we see each other as immoral. Sometimes, we even see each other as evil… It is what it is. I for one welcome it and embrace it. I wish to see my values reign supreme over the Earth.
To be clear, then, White survival, which necessarily requires White unity, is not your priority. Your “values” are your priority.
That project may take decades or even centuries, but its worth it.
If you can find a way to pursue your pipe dream without sabotaging the pro-White cause with your spite, knock yourself out. But then I don’t see how your vision of creating a New White Person is relevant to the fact that Miss Kupfer is dead today.
whether its feminism and the break up of the family (yeah, I’m going there).
Feminism is not responsible for the decline of the traditional family – individualism is, both male and female.
The reason why spoiled women such as yourself are subject to sadistic comments – ironic or unironic – is largely because you’ve gone off the rails and act as if the world exists to serve you. I’ve seen your interactions with the boys on here, and I have zero sympathy. You made your cake. Time to eat it.
Again, you show no concern whatsoever for the pro-White cause. All that matters to you is that I be force-fed cake that you claim I baked, whatever disgrace comes to the movement as a result.
This conversation is steering off in too many directions. Everything you said about whether White men or White women are more susceptible to indoctrination is not of any interest to me, and in my view, reveals just how completely pre-occupied you are with the gender debate.
I would like to know why you are “not sure it would be a good thing” for our race to become immune to indoctrination through becoming independent thinkers. Do you think it gets to close to individualism? Do you think people wouldn’t come to conclusions that are truthful and wise? What’s the hang up?
If people are lemmings, then they can’t (or won’t) think independently. They’ll follow the herd, even if the herd is running off a cliff. Suffice to say, all it takes is hostile leaders giving them the wrong information to get them to run off the cliff.
In theory, if they ignored the herd, or otherwise didn’t listen to their herd instincts, then sure, it’s possible they’ll just become radical individualists that shun the crowd out of spite. But what if they did the more virtuous thing instead? What if they sought out the truth – scientific, historical, economical, and all other areas of endeavor?
The strongest critique you can make of my position is that people aren’t saints and would instead just use the vector of independent thinking to pursue their self-interest. To that, I say: If we as Whites are destined to fail to do the right thing, or figure out the right thing – simply put, if we destined to be flawed sinners instead of saints – then we’re going to lose anyway.
The thing I hate most about the lemming theory is the myth William Pierce pushed that if “we were in charge, the people would go along with it.” This movement seems to think power is a silver bullet. To that, I say two things:
1. I see zero way of acquiring power in the first place without changing people’s minds, which necessarily requires them to accept what we are preaching. The movement goes no where primarily because our ideas, at least until very recently (post 2015) have gone no where.
2. If we somehow were in power through a military coup or whatever, I believe White people would resist us with every fiber of their being and just reinstall the old rulers. We are hated by the very people we’re trying to save, and that doesn’t change until *they* change.
Turning our people into independent thinkers would seem to be the best way to get them to accept our ideas – which are truthful and, short of a transhumanist breakthrough, completely 100% immutable.
My challenge to you is this: If White people are lemmings, then how in Seven Hells do we go about changing their minds and saving them when we have none of the influence and our enemies have all of it?
DP84,
There is a serious problem with your thinking that needs to cleared up straightaway. You construct a false either/or with your talk of lemmings and independent thinkers. The last century has seen an unprecedented level of elite thought control due to the advent of the television set and the proliferation of other electronic media. We also see consolidation in the crucial publishing, especially educational publishing, industries. The upshot is a literal matrix of thought control that is extremely difficult to resist, and failure to do so does not make one a “lemming.”
You propose not only to encourage independent thinking, but rather to inoculate a population to pervasive, inescapable, 24-7 indoctrination from toddlerhood. I do not think that is a realistic goal. Beyond that, I’m not sure how indifference to Brianna’s murder would further that goal, anyway. Are you suggesting that we should welcome the culling of the herd? Shouldn’t the herd already have been good and culled by the two World Wars? For that matter, wouldn’t a catastrophic war with Russia likewise remove some dupes from the gene pool and strengthen our race for a glorious future?
In theory, if they ignored the herd, or otherwise didn’t listen to their herd instincts, then sure, it’s possible they’ll just become radical individualists that shun the crowd out of spite. But what if they did the more virtuous thing instead? What if they sought out the truth – scientific, historical, economical, and all other areas of endeavor?
You want to know why I question your objective of an indoctrination-proof White race. Here you hint at the answer, but don’t quite get it. Truth be told, I don’t quite get it, either, and I cannot give you a fully-developed rational argument on the question. It is an intuitive uneasiness that I have, not a philosophical objection.
I have come to believe, over the course of a couple of decades thinking about vice and virtue, that character, like engineering, requires trade-offs. Improvements in one area often require compromise in others. Simply put, I don’t think you can make White people any more intellectually independent than we already are without changing anything else about us. To give you a feel for the potential unintended consequences:
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/pyschopaths-might-be-immune-contagious-yawning-180956386/
‘I’m honestly a strong believer in the doctrine of personal responsibility, as it has served me well throughout my adult life.’
The problem with this doctrine is that it is inherently a-political and, fundamentally, deceitful.
It’s apolitical – and thus ineffective as a counter to Woke politics – because ‘the individual’ is not the ground on which real political struggle takes place. Not yesterday. Not today. Not tomorrow. Political struggle has always been between some ‘us’ and some ‘them’, not between ‘you’ and ‘me’.
‘Personal responsibility’ is deceitful because it almost never seems to be a voluntary action. People are held personally responsible by others. Both the claim of taking personal responsibility and any subsequent action taken as acts of personal responsibility take place in a social and political environment.
Whenever anyone on the Right says ‘personal responsibility’ what it always means in context is a rationalization of an indifference to suffering of others. However much you or any other person on the Right might want to gussy it up, when the ethical rubber meets the existential road, waving a way the suffering of others is what ‘personal responsibility’ does for the Right.
It means you don’t have to do any emotional work to sympathize and you don’t have to any political work to figure out how to make things better.
‘Personal responsibility’ doesn’t work as a political doctrine and the consistent growth of the Left in face of the Right’s commitment to ‘personal responsibility’ is a sign of how weak many of the Right’s ideas are as forms of persuasion.
I care about Whites. I don’t care about right-wing ideas that don’t serve a pro-White position.
‘Personal responsibility’ is one of those right-wing shibboleths that cannot be allowed to have a central place in pro-White thinking. It depoliticizes what must be politicized: White suffering.
Similar arguments are made by Racist Leftists in regards to the White Underclass (as they call it, the “White Working Class”; which is a lie btw, as there is a massive difference between a factory worker and a deadbeat drug addict): They only act that way because “White Elites” failed to guide them and give them a proper culture.
And this argument is turned against us by liberals who use it as an opportunity to present all aggrieved less prosperous Whites, especially those concerned about the complete and total, revolutionary transformation of their hitherto peaceful societies by mass third-world immigration as perpetually whining, parasitic, “din do nuffin” professional victims/grifters. All racial groups have their no-hope cases – though some groups more than others. We Whites shouldn’t fetishize our bottom tenth – though neither should we abandon them. There should be a productive role for just about everybody from which an individual derives a sense of meaningful and positive value – that’s how efficient high-trust societies have always worked.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.