Whose Flag Is It Anyway?Robert Hampton
American liberals are torn over our national symbols. On one hand, they claim them as their own and say they represent everything they love–multiculturalism, equality, anti-fascism, and DEMOCRACY. On the other, they will say at times these symbols offend them and must be replaced. This conflict was encapsulated last week by New York Times editorial board member Mara Gay.
The black journalist recounted on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” her horrifying ordeal over the first weekend in June. “I was on Long Island this weekend visiting a really dear friend, and I was really disturbed. I saw, you know, dozens and dozens of pickup trucks with explicatives [sic] against Joe Biden on the back of them, Trump flags, and in some cases just dozens of American flags, which is also just disturbing … Essentially the message was clear: This is my country. This is not your country. I own this,” Gay said. “I think that as long as they see Americanness as the same as one with whiteness, this is going to continue.”
She added: “That is the real concern. Because, you know, the Trump voters who are not going to get onboard with democracy, they’re a minority. You can marginalize them, long-term. But if we don’t take the threat seriously, then I think we’re all in really bad shape.”
To recap, a prominent black journalist said Old Glory disturbs her because it represents white people, and we need to figure out ways to separate American symbols from whiteness. We also need to marginalize and reeducate these backwards whites.
The “Morning Joe” panel, consisting mostly of “patriotic” centrists, nodded along with Gay’s assessment. The set backdrop displays a dozen or so American flags flying heroically, which made their agreement all the richer. The clip became instant conservative click bait and mainstream cons filled Miss Gay’s mentions with Americans flags. The New York Times defended its editorial board member while Gay accused her critics of racism. Some liberals showed support for her as well. “As a military veteran, I completely agree with Mara Gay. It is disturbing. Large American flags on trucks are performative nonsense that are absolutely intended to communicate that America is a conservative, white country,” tweeted trans activist “Charlotte” Clymer.
This is obviously not the most important story in the world, and it’s tailor-made for conservative media to obsess over. There’s an out-of-touch liberal journalist who needs a safe space from the Stars and Stripes! It’s easy to mock Gay’s stance, and it goes along with her past analysis. She famously claimed Michael Bloomberg could give every American a million dollars with his $500 million campaign war chest. This incredible mathematical analysis was not well-received, which led Gay to accuse her critics of racism (a common argument from black journalists). Gay is clearly an idiot who has her job thanks to affirmative action. Like most black journalists, she’s incapable of deep analysis or original insight. She’s just there to satisfy a racial quota.
In spite of her stupidity, Gay’s stance on the flag signifies the Left’s conflict with American symbols and patriotism. Patriotism is ripe for them to define, as they do control the institutions that shape our culture. Yet, they can’t resist wanting to destroy the symbols that inspire ordinary Americans.
“Morning Joe” host Joe Scarborough attempted to offer the nation a lib-friendly patriotism just a few weeks ago. “America, love it or leave it!” he yelled at Trump supporters who refused to accept the present order. “If you don’t have respect in American democracy anymore, if you don’t respect Madisonian checks and balances if your guy doesn’t win, if that’s the new rules of engagement for this great republic, then just leave our country! Because you’re unworthy of it!”
He also made sure to argue that foreigners are superior to white Americans: “There are millions of immigrants who will come here and raise their right hand and buy into the creed and believe that we are exceptional, that believe American democracy is the greatest government on the face of the Earth!”
In this image of America, people of all races, creeds, and sexual orientations join together to wave the flag as “anti-American” white Trump supporters are deported to Siberia. This rainbow coalition is the real America, not founding stock whites living in rural backwaters. This is a patriotism liberals can adopt but they’re incapable of doing it. All it takes is refraining from seeing national symbols as disturbing and declaring our founding documents white supremacist. This is apparently impossible. They’re too arrogant to appeal to normie whites with patriotism.
This is very fortunate. The cringe patriotism of Joe Scarborough is an abomination that imposes multiculturalism and unrestricted egalitarianism on the American people–and they would likely buy it. It’s similar to the delusions that the troops who stormed Normandy were Antifa or that the Union armies fought for racial equality. “LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT” did convince millions to support George W. Bush and the Iraq war. This same mentality could potentially persuade otherwise healthy people to think it’s great to tear down “traitor” statues and have transgender Marines.
But the Left is moving completely away from any traces of patriotism. Black Lives Matter rallies don’t fly Old Glory, unlike the civil rights demonstrations of the 1960s. Protesting the anthem is considered a mandatory act for athletes. Our own leaders condemn America as a fundamentally racist country and trace this plague back to the founding. The Left is more comfortable with the pride flag and the black power fist than with Americana.
Traditional patriotism is symbolic of whiteness. Predominantly white high schools will fly the flag and sing the Star-Spangled Banner as they play rival non-white teams. Schools have of course banned the flag to avoid offending the sensitive non-whites. The battle over the anthem protests ultimately came down to race. Blacks and their enablers argue the flag represents white supremacy, whites say it represents their country. Only 35% of blacks feel positive emotions about the anthem, compared to roughly 80% of white Americans. Since blacks, being America’s gods, shape our consciousness, that lukewarm feeling will only grow among the rest of the population.
Meanwhile, middle American whites will still be inspired by the flag and patriotism. Sixty-four-year-old Lisa English is a typical example of this reverence. The Washington Post interviewed the retiree in May about her thoughts on patriotism and anthem protests. She proudly flies the flag outside her North Carolina home and says it’s “our history.” English recalled how terrible she felt when she couldn’t stand for the anthem at a recent football game because of a leg injury. No black or immigrant would probably feel the same anguish over such a matter.
Many right-wingers see the corrupt Empire of Nothing and want to separate completely from the symbols it appropriated from the Old Republic. This makes no sense with the Empire itself dispense with these symbols and they’re still cherished by our people. You can’t create symbols overnight that will make our people feel anguish at not standing up for them. We should do the opposite of what Mara Gay suggests. We should divorce these symbols from the present and make them represent the people the regime hates. Those truck drivers on Long Island are right to declare that these are our symbols.
We want people like Mara Gay to be disturbed by the American flag. It’s better for them to fear it than to claim it as their own.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Wokeism’s Loyal Evangelical Subjects
The Populist Moment, Chapter 9, Part 2: “Conservatives of the Left” & the Critique of Value
Kevin MacDonald on Whites & Individualism
Christmas in the Trenches
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 513 The Writers’ Bloc with Horus on the Implicit Whiteness of Liberalism
Revolution of the Nation
Až moc bělochů v ledním hokeji
An Ethnographic Guide to Political Groups in America
I have lived for many years in a very Blue place. In thirty years I have never heard anybody attack China, Islam or Blacks. But if you make positive or, worse, patriotic statements about America, you will be swiftly attacked as a racist.
The Liberal-Progressive narrative of America is of the resistance and survival of Sacred Victim Minorities against the endless crimes of America against them: slavery and genocide and discrimination. That’s it. Blacks, Indians, Mexicans, Chinese and Japanese, Moslems, all of them tell their stories as survivors against America.
Jews and Hindus transfer their resentments against Europeans here and perpetrate them on White Americans.
Any claims to attachment to this actual country are fraudulent tactics to cover their enmity.
The only group which has not created its identity out of surviving against America are the White Americans, the only authentic Americans, the people who made and who are America.
“Jews and Hindus transfer their resentments against Europeans here and perpetrate them on White Americans.”
Way to go for saying this. The admission of a large number of Hindus into the US is nearly as much of a disaster as the earlier admission of a large number of Jews. Of course, Jews are largely responsible for it since it has occurred as a result of their pet project, the 1965 Immigration Act.
The red pill path is long. Civic nationalists eventually realize that democracy requires homogenous race demographic. Just read Plato; or the writings of the founders of the US. These idea are forbidden today.
When did the Romans adopt a post Republican set of symbols, when did they adopt the symbols of Imperial period and when did they adopt the Chi Rho XP? The symbols are quite telling. Stars and Stripes are, in a sense, old worn out as the battle standard. Like the Roman Eagle or the Lightning on the shell curved Legionary shield for a Byzantine era Tagamata. The Stars and Stripes used to be a way to show whites cooperating under an egalitarian post ethnic compact that a white republic was unstoppable. Then the GOP turned it into a banner of commercial industrialism. Now it’s soiled toilet paper for Nikki Haley to wrap herself in.
They’ll never co-opt Old Glory, they despise her. It represents the glory, excellence and achievements of the Historic American Nation. It represents a society that their ancestors could’ve never built, and they know it.
Eventually they’ll come for her, but they’ll never adopt her.
Great piece. It has swayed me.
Seems it was either late in MulattObama’s first term or at the beginning of his second when, mirabile dictu, one began hearing the sneering class wax patriotic. It was a surreal reversal–or sheer appropriation– that I don’t believe can be simply attributed to any particular sleight of hand from the magic negro.
Whether deep state psyop and or convenient reversal it does feel like this ‘planting’ of the flag has the tribal imprimatur all over it.
It could be that there are only Cohencidences anymore.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Edit your comment