Counter-Currents
3,428 words
In September 2017 a young black man reportedly stripped naked in the street, barged into the home of his white girlfriend whom he had dated for two years, pulled her outside and repeatedly slammed her head into the ground, killing her. Her family was mightily puzzled; they say he had been a model boyfriend before this anomalous (but conclusive) episode. It didn’t surprise me, however; I read the news. But it did make me think.
Whenever I try to discuss the realities of black violence, I often hear the lazy rejoinder: “white people do that stuff too.” While this is true, context is helpful. White people do murder, rape, and rob. The way in which blacks differ from whites—and this makes a lot of difference—is the manner and the frequency with which they commit these crimes. The stupendously high frequency of black crime is well documented. Let’s look at the manner in which black crime differs from white. In short, blacks often launch into bizarre and ultra-violent modes of violence, patterns that whites imitate rarely, if ever. Amidst this miasma of barbarism some tendencies do indeed recur, and I shall, somewhat grandiosely, call them laws.
I wish hereby to illuminate several ideas: (1) the degree with which the black mentality differs from that of whites, and (2) the nature of the war that the black race is waging against the white in America. Therefore, all that follows is black-on-white mayhem. Blacks differ significantly from whites in practically every measure of behavior, but these examples show how stark the difference is in the arena of violent crime and its psychology.
Here goes:
Law number one: if blacks get a white woman under their power, say, during a home invasion or carjacking, they are certain to rape her. This is, of course, apart from all the crimes whose object is specifically to rape white women. There seems to be no situation, however grisly, that prevents a black guy from considering it a good time to pull down his pants and switch to pleasure mode. Terrified, weeping hostages? Dead and mangled bodies in the room, blood-splattered walls? Not a mood-dampener for the black man intent on a good time.
- In 1997, two young blacks in Michigan carjacked an 18-year-old girl named Karen King and over the next several hours showed her off to their friends as she wept and pleaded for mercy in the back seat of her own vehicle. They boasted, “I’m gonna do this bitch.” (I’m sure they said, “dis,” but, whatever.) The elder black stabbed her, “snapped” her neck and then had sex with her body. I remember this case vividly because I lived in the region.
- A case from 1990 is especially horrific. A family of four, the Parkers, returned from a church service to their home in rural Mississippi to find two thieving blacks in the house. The intruders bound the man and son, shooting them to wound only, and then raped the nine-year-old girl vaginally and anally, essentially forcing the family to watch. The father almost severed his wrists trying to escape his restraints and help his daughter. The blacks then set the house on fire. They may have raped the mother too, but her body was too badly burned to tell. As of 2016 they’re still on death row; one claims memory loss from a concussion sustained in prison, and the other mental retardation, and the state apparently considers these good enough reasons not to fry them.
- In the 1974 “Hi Fi murders” in Ogden, Utah, two black demons ripping off an electronics store took five white hostages, tied them up and forced four of them to drink an industrial drain cleaner similar to Drano, mistakenly hoping for a quick death. It didn’t work, so they shot them, not all fatally. The young girl (never mind the moaning, writhing victims, several expired victims, the reek of gunpowder, and the danger of being discovered at any time) was taken aside, repeatedly raped, then dragged back and thrown among the other victims and killed with a shot to the head. Both of these monsters were executed, a rare case of actual justice. Ah, the good old days, when bad guys were actually done to death.
Law number two: no woman is too old to be raped.
- A black in Wichita with a long criminal record (do I even have to say that?) broke in and raped a 100-year old woman, Martha Schell, before—or after—he punched her in the head and “threw her around,” breaking her back. She later died.
- A “Tyrone” broke into the home of the Straits, an elderly couple in Tulsa, badly beat the 89-year-old man, then beat and brutally raped—twice—the man’s 84-year-old wife. She died soon after; the man died a few weeks later. Prosecutors did not seek the death penalty because the perp is massively stupid. The prosecutor cited “mental limitations” and “borderline IQ.” I think commentary would be superfluous.
- Delroy Grant is probably the record-holder in this sphere, although he did his work across the pond, in England. Born in Jamaica, he spent almost two decades targeting solitary elderly white women and men in the London area for often-brutal rape and burglary. His victims mounted into the hundreds before police caught him in 2009.
Law number three: there is simply no limit to the mindless brutality. Tons of material here.
- Consider Micah Nelson. He had the usual grim ghetto upbringing, although he did have the diversion of sex with his thirteen-year-old sister. When he was eleven. The authorities discovered this fact when their seven-year-old male cousin, who also enjoyed, um, “relations” with the sister, was found to have gonorrhea. An adult was obviously involved somewhere in this sexual boogie. Anyway, Micah—older now, say, murdering age—was prowling the neighborhood. He entered through an open window, and woke 78-year-old Virginia Brace. He raped her and threw her in the trunk of her own car. He drove around aimlessly, trying to find a spot to kill her. He finally found one, pushed her into the woods, and began strangling her. He couldn’t finish the job, although he managed to fracture a vertebra. He got the fire extinguisher from the car, blew it full-blast into her mouth two or three times. This crude attempt didn’t work, though they later found residue in her lungs. Imagine his frustration. He finally finished the job by ramming a tire iron into her mouth and through the back of her neck.
- Anne Pressly, an attractive anchorwoman in Little Rock, Arkansas, also had an unexpected black visitor, who broke in, raped her, and beat her so severely that her face was shattered “like an eggshell,” her jaw forced so far back that it cut off the flow of blood to her brain. The attack sprayed blood on the ceiling and left her face “crunchy” to the touch. Her own mother, looking for her the next morning, didn’t recognize her. Emergency doctors thought the blonde Pressly was a redhead. “I lose control, she lose control,” the brute explained, not very helpfully. She died five days later. The state spared him the death penalty “after hearing testimony about his rocky upbringing by an abusive, drug-addicted mother.” Ah, the good old days . . .
- Black women also have their fun. One fat bitch wasted on booze and Ecstasy smashed into a white pedestrian, Gregory Biggs, with her car. The poor guy got stuck fast in her windshield, his mangled legs sticking out. (I don’t think he enjoyed his encounter with diversity.) She drove several miles to her own garage and left him to die over the next several hours. There was a fire station very close by, where she could have sought help for the victim, but that would have required feelings. She checked on him several times while he was dying in her garage, bleeding, stuck on the jagged glass of her windshield, but helped not one damn bit. Admittedly, she was somewhat busy, what with the sex and drugs she was doing in her apartment. The next day her friends helped her ditch his body in the park and burn the car. Jews considered this story socially relevant enough to put on film, produced by Robert Katz and Jay Firestone, but they cast a white woman in the role of the black, naturally. Of course, this obscured the only real point in the whole matter: callous black attitudes towards white life.
- Then there was the hulking former female boxer with a long criminal record. Apparently she had wrapped all her presents, it being Christmas Eve, so she kidnaped the twelve-year-old neighbor boy, Jonathan Foster, and tortured him to death with a cutting torch, a fearsome instrument used to cut steel. She dumped his unrecognizable body in a ditch. No Christmas for him. The cops fought back tears as they described the murder, and called the perp a “cold, soulless murderer.”
- Of course, I could cite the “Wichita Massacre” and the “Knoxville Horror,” but the reliable mainstream media saw nothing remarkable in them. Apparently they were just your garden-variety kidnap-torture-rape-murders.
Law number four: there’s a good chance the offender will burn the victim. Blacks apparently think that fire obliterates the possibility of forensic science. This practice also evinces staggering, barbaric cruelty.
- Nancy Harris, 76, was clerking at a gas station when the world’s biggest asshole walked in, stoked on drugs. He robbed her, first dousing her head with lighter fluid, a breathtakingly sinister action. When he took what he wanted, including the ring off her finger, he set her afire and calmly strolled out, pocketing other items from the shelves. She didn’t survive. He got the death penalty.
- A boy who endured vicious racial harassment in a majority-black high school—by teachers as well as other “students”—was followed home from school by two “teens,” who doused his head with gasoline and set him on fire. Luckily he was able to put it out and was not terribly injured. But still.
- When responders found young Jessica Chambers staggering beside the road in December 2014, burned over 98 percent of her body, I thought to myself, yup, I know who did that. After a very long wait without a break in the case, a black is now the prime suspect.
- In August 2016, five blacks, including a Shanquavious and a Cortavious, and a female named “Angel,” broke into the home of 83-year-old Dorothy Dow and demanded money. She protested she didn’t have any, so they pistol-whipped her, leaving her with lacerations on her face, two broken arms, and all the fingers broken on one hand. Then they set her alight. She was able to douse the flames, but died several weeks later.
Law number five: spontaneity. Blacks will attack and kill on the merest of whims, or none at all.
- One malefactor conceived a powerful desire for a girl he saw by chance in a convenience store in South Carolina. Instead of asking her for her phone number, he followed her in his car, ran her off the road, raped her and beat her to death with a bat. Her name, which has been burned into my memory ever since, was Beverly Hope Melton. She had been recently married. Since the perp’s method was not exactly very slick, the police quickly caught him. Free meals for life.
- Another black, labelled by news reports a “gentle giant,” became agitated for unknown reasons in a train station in San Antonio. He paced back and forth and then suddenly fell on a slight white man named Joseph Richard sitting nearby waiting for a train, smashing him viciously with his massive fists. He paused momentarily, rose up, and announced to horrified onlookers, “I feel like killing someone,” before resuming the assault, which left the victim’s face “unrecognizable as a human face.” The poor man didn’t survive.
- Another fiend walked up behind a young girl named Aysha Ring waiting in line at a store and simply slit her throat, killing her. She was the only white person in the store at the time. His motive was definitely not racial; the question didn’t even arise during the investigation.
Here’s more spontaneity, or perhaps it’s considered diversity; I do get my SJW terminology mixed up sometimes:
- Kevin Shifflett, an eight-year-old boy, was playing in his front yard in Alexandria, Virginia. He was the picture of innocence. Then a syphilitic black career felon passing by suddenly veered off the sidewalk, stabbed him eighteen times, and slit his throat. A note was found in the murderer’s possession, “Kill them raceess whiate kidd’s anyway.” This was ruled no hate crime, however, because the perp was “craaaazy.”
Law number six: blacks like to perform while naked.
- There was the naked face eater in Miami, who stripped off his clothes and sauntered down a highway until he saw a homeless white man, Ronald Poppo. He fell upon the poor guy, beat him, stripped off his pants, and then fell to chewing on his face, literally ripping off chunks. The police had to shoot him to death because he refused to stop growling—yes, growling—and chewing on the poor man. Authorities suspected the attacker was on a horrific drug such as bath salts, but this was apparently not the case. He was simply strolling naked/face-chewing while black.
- There was the case of the former pro football player caught trying to break into homes while stark naked three times in the space of eight months.
- Another man ran wild in a white neighborhood, breaking down gates, swimming in a pool, and running into homes. He eventually ran past an astonished man into his front door, locked him out, and then savagely beat the elderly inhabitant, Carol Sturgis, “beyond recognition.” He broke her jaw, sternum, ribs, crushed her larynx, and lacerated her head. Police said the injuries were the result of a “stomping.” He also stripped down to skin. The police arrested him outside the home, naked and bloody. Drugs were suspected, but he was calm and lucid during his interrogation. Another case of “representing.”
- This past January, a male elementary-school teacher conducting a physical education class on the playground suddenly stripped naked and began chasing the kids, who fled in terror. After a few moments, he stopped and put his clothes back on, and sauntered away.
So, what is the lesson here? Avoid inner cities? Keep such people at arm’s length? Read John Derbyshire’s “The Talk: Nonblack Version”? I’m kidding (although “The Talk” is actually good). The real lesson is the need for the total separation of the races.
Both races need separation because blacks are sufficiently different from whites (and vice versa, of course) as to exclude peaceable, stable coexistence, especially from the perspective of the races as groups. The episodes above hopefully give a powerful indication of that. These examples also illustrate the bloody front line in the war that blacks are waging on whites, a war that most whites do not even recognize, let alone understand.
Black-on-white crime has amassed some huge numbers since the 1960s. Since the Civil Rights Act of 1964 blacks have murdered roughly 50,000 whites. Blacks sexually assault or rape thousands, probably tens of thousands, of white women every year. In addition, the number of robberies and assaults since the 1960s is in the tens of millions. In just two years, 2012-2013, blacks committed 1,121,200 violent crimes (robbery, assault, murder, rape) against whites. For those concerned about the tsunami of black-on-black crime, the amount of black-on-white crime is virtually the same.
This is war. It is a low-grade, undeclared war, but one nevertheless. No black leader has ever made an official declaration of war upon whites, but a very large number of blacks implicitly understand that they are engaged in a struggle, and seize their opportunity to strike a blow when they can. Conversely, very few whites know the true magnitude of black-on-white crime, let alone the conscious anti-white intentions of blacks. Or perhaps they just won’t admit it, because I guarantee you every white adult experiences fear around groups of young black males after dark. There’s no denying the power of instinct, but the intellect is a much different animal.
Besides the “hot” war of violent crime, there are many other aspects of this conflict.
A telling way to look at the relations between the races is to ask, which one holds psychological dominance? Which one generally intimidates the other? Three generations previous, it was blacks who were intimidated and essentially kept in their place. Blacks faced harsh punishment for transgressions against whites. (I am not saying I want to get back to this; separation is what I want.) Now it is whites who are intimidated and fearful of offending.
A major facet of the race-war is propaganda. Blacks now enjoy many editorial or journalistic positions from which to spread anti-white messages to the nodding masses, amplified by the power of the mainstream media. Blacks also use positions in the important power bases of academia and government agencies—allied with liberal whites—to muzzle, legally coerce, and even physically intimidate whites who resist their program. Blacks successfully police our very speech. Many of us are well aware of this, but does its true dimension really sink in? Think about it: blacks can call down harsh penalties on any white who merely says something they don’t like. This psychological warfare is tending more and more strongly to demonize whites, a program that has so often led to further, harsher measures in the past. This program, ironically and hopefully, has the unintended effect of making more and more whites aware of black hostility.
Yes, blacks hold this power largely because of their alliance with Jews, but I want to leave that aside for now.
In waging the war, blacks are conquering territory from whites, an important and natural objective in wartime. They have taken over many of our once-magnificent cities, driving whites out with a range of black pathologies, mainly violent crime. They drove the whites from virtually all of Detroit, and are now moving out into the first ring of white suburbs, a phenomenon seen across the country. (I’ll be damned if they don’t bring with them into these nice white areas that same “lack of jobs/poverty/crime” the whites condemned them to, anomalously, in the inner cities.) Whites are yet again fleeing this invasion, but the overall process is slow enough that it does not take on a warlike aspect in the minds of the victims; it seems like a benign evolution, people simply moving in and out. It is not; it is the conquest of territory.
Our hostile elites force whites to offer up financial tribute to blacks. Wealth-creating whites pay a disproportionate share of taxes and blacks receive a disproportionate share of benefits via welfare payments and grants to black city governments (among other things). Blacks tend to destroy the areas in which they live, including housing, schools, and infrastructure, and then demand the great cargo-cult government provide great sums of money to fix it all. The government complies and sends a big fat check to the utterly corrupt black city governments. I have seen three generations of public housing rise and decay in Detroit, and I never cease to marvel.
Another front in the war is miscegenation. This one is really sensitive because it hits our women, our reproductive potential (not that whites are maximizing this potential), and our biological succession. Blacks increasingly appropriate the childbearing capacity of white women and with it produce their own progeny. This has, of course, a double effect: the birth of one black prevents the birth of one white. In addition, this infuses the gene pool of blacks with a greater capacity for intelligence and energy, making them more dangerous to whites. Miscegenation captures portions of our talent, our war-making capacity, for their side. It’s like a Civil War regiment captured an artillery battery and turned it to their use.
There’s only one definitive way to end this madness, and that is separation. No hatred, no retaliation, no violence needed. We hold ourselves above that. But we must induce a recognition on all sides of the imperative need of separate national homelands (after all, many blacks have called for separation over the years, and black re-segregation is proceeding apace, especially in institutions of higher education). The work of Counter-Currents in the sphere of metapolitics is exciting, necessary, and vital. I hope we have enough time left for it to come to fruition. In my mind’s eye I can just see that Nice White Country, shimmering off in the distance.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
23 comments
My blood is boiling with rage. We must direct such rage into getting results. Control it.
The President’s recent declaration of “prison reform” is likely to dump violent blacks back on the population. What will happen when they inevitable reoffend as opposed to his fairy tale of the “outstanding worker” these people are potentially? As for separation – agreed and not just blacks but also Jews and other non-whites.
A point about miscegenation, is it turning out smarter blacks and dumber whites or some sort of halfway creature, not really belonging anywhere. Is it the point to creat a deracinated, non-belonging group of people?
For the miscegenation, it’s the latter but blacks will often claim these hybrids as their own except when no one else is around like in Haiti after the massacre of the French, then they will kill them if they outnumber them and can kill them. Even though they in many ways led up the uprising there, nonetheless the mulattoes were largely exterminated afterwards.
Great article. Thank you.
I was already convinced.
It might be expanded through more links. The argument I would expect is that, “you are only seeing what you want to see.” (From the zman, the corollary is, “you are not seeing what you don’t want to see.”)
I thought links, to provide a historical perspective, such as the first Europeans coming into contact with African tribes (and American Indian tribes), would be helpful. Its not just blacks that are extremely, (insanely), violent. Links to the most savage examples from ancient Roman and other historians who came into contact with Eurasian tribes would also be helpful.
“When the Saxon began to hate”
It’s naive to think we can rely only on “separation.” Separation can only be achieved by a much higher awareness of the problem and willingness of a larger number of white people to ACT on behalf of WHITE interests. Once those levels of awareness and willingness to act are achieved, there’s no stopping at mere separation, in my view. There will be a counter attack and an effort to re-capture black occupied territory. There will be little tolerance for these “people” to continue to occupy what was formerly WHITE territory.
This is not difficult to do. Most MUDS are concentrated in inner cities where they can easily be cut off and trapped. Cut off water, power, food, etc., and let nature take its course. No need for “house to house” fighting or any other kind of fighting. Just wait it out and let nature take its course.
White people today are suffering from an irrational, suicidal and essentially psychopathic bias against genocide.
Are you suggesting that conscious massacre is the proper response to our situation vis a vis the blacks? I prefer to think that we could use our brains to bring about a better solution. Greg Johnson suggests giving them some contiguous states in the deep South and fostering beneficial patterns of migration to arrive at separate black and whites states. That’s one possibility. Another is paying to move them back to Africa. But genocide? Not my cup of tea.
An autonomous region in the South is almost inevitable. Multi-ethnic empires always eventually splinter along geo-ethnic lines. In fact, it can hardly be prevented. The USSR thot it had eliminated ethnic nationalism until it exploded in 1991. Whatever the attitude of governments, as populations sort themselves out by ethnicity, blood n soil consciousness takes over. When DC gridlocks (we’re almost there now) n loses the power to intervene, a Hindu/Muslim type 1947 partition will spontaneously occur. Like Jews n Arabs in 1948. Germans n Poles in 1945. Once that begins there will be no stopping it.
Hello Mr.Perdue, I would love to hear what you have to say! Perhaps writing and publishing your articles here on CC!? That would most certainly be a treat.
I think we have to be honest about a few things. Blacks are not owed anything and any political separation solution for them could involve billions/ trillions more of dollars of white money.
It’s also a mistake to view their fate through a white moral lens. White moral values are not a good fit for blackness. We need to unburden ourselves about ‘what happens to blacks’ in some future political environment where we have control. It doesn’t actually matter what happens to them.
Eventually, in the long term there will also need to be some international agreement about withdrawing aid to Africa, who’s population is set to explode. The world has to ask honest difficult questions about how many blacks the Earth needs, and about the demographic balance of the entire planet.
A sickening coda to the Hi-Fi murders: after these two savages received death sentences the NAACP, Amnesty International and the Organization of American States all fought to overturn their convictions.
From Wikipedia: “The NAACP demanded that Pierre and Andrews’ death sentences should be revoked because of racial bias at the trial. They noted that the defendants were both black, and the victims and jury were all white.”
I’m from London, UK and I 100% agree. Just witness the alrming level of knife volience in our country of which the vast majority of assialants are Black.
The Iroquois and Apache were also mindlessly savage and sadistic, not only to Whites but with other tribes too. The Tai Ping rebellion in mid 19th century China also demonstrates the acceptance of extreme brutality within non-White cultures.
The article summarizes the problem. Likely most of us who read it are already aware. I’ve used some of the data and scenarios depicted in the piece on white liberals and their response is always, ‘well whites do the same.’ Then the argument degenerates into discussion of statistics.
I pointed out to one such libtard fellow the thousands of white females raped by blacks each year and his answer was that that was the case because there are so many more whites that naturally the women of no color are targeted more. Never mind that solid studies adjust stats to account for population differences and I offered up the challenge: name a famous case where a white man or groups of white men raped a black woman? Silence.
The only solution is for whites to establish their own white country. Of all the solid material out their that identifies the problem, none offer any solutions save one, that being Harold Covington and his Northwest Front and Northwest Republic which he describes in his five novels on the subject. With all his warts and foibles Harold has the only viable solution. Organize and take back the cities? Vote RepubliCON? Get real.
You might add the urban insurrections precipitated by blacks since the Watts Riot of August 1965 and which have continued through to today’s era of Black Lives Matter.
Radical activists have frequently referred to these riots as “uprisings” and “rebellions,” though this may be their attempt to hijack the mayhem for their own purposes. Please note these “rebellions” began with the triumph of the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s, i.e., they exploited the political victory to consolidate with boots on the ground. Many inner cities never recovered from the Long Hot Summers, and the riots did contribute to White people being forced out of various urban areas and into the suburbs, as if fleeing before an invading army.
(This ought to get us to reconsider past riots attributed to White “racism,” such as Tulsa 1921 and Detroit 1943. Perhaps there needs to be a study showing the number of urban riots precipitated by blacks as opposed to Whites over the last century, as well as the overall toll in lives and property.)
More mayhem originates with black gangbanging. A point made on various race realist websites is that black gangs recapitulate African warlord bands insofar as they organize around a big man, stake out control of territory, openly defy constituted authority, and drive out their rivals with often mindless violence.
Related are black flashmobs and such, organized violence against persons and property, and again a way to gain control of public spaces as law abiding citizens are forced to cede territory.
As always, the question is: “Is there a political component to the violence?”
How many of these assaults, flashmobs, drivebys, torture-homicides and urban insurrections are pursued because of the general anti-White agitprop pushed through the media, academia and corporate-government bureaucracies? i.e., if White people are “oppressing” blacks, then blacks have a right to use violence to obtain “justice.”
We see similar patterns in European banlieues and the rainbow nation of South Africa, where black-third worlder criminality, rioting and terrorism drive White people out of the cities and farms their ancestors built, and etc.
It may be that blacks commit their violence intentionally as a form of tribal insurgency to take over cities, displace rival demographics, and exact tribute in the form of taxpayer transfers and corporate handouts. Straight out of Congo, Liberia, Uganda and Compton.
As I say, it’s worthy of more study. And also, to motivate White people to take action in defense of themselves and their civilization.
The reason blacks strip down before committing violence is because the animal suddenly, and overpoweringly asserts itself. Blacks were naked when we discovered them in Africa. It is a return to the primal state of nature that suddenly reasserts itself–they “Chimp Out.” In a colorful colloquialism, “They are going old school.” Civilization on blacks is very thin veneer, subject to sloughing off at any time. The worse case of black on white crime that I read when I perused Chimpout.com was where a white mother left her white infant son in the care of her black boyfriend while she was out. Well of course the baby started crying, so the black boyfriend decided to rape the little infant boy too death, which he did. The nigger said he kept fucking it until it finally stopped crying.
The story of the White infant raped and murdered is the most heart breaking. Even more heart breaking is the lack of interest by other Whites. Another Aryan soul gone without notice. Like all the White Aryan Gentiles that were truly genocided in and between the two “world wars”.
Anyway, is is not just an individual nigger that reverts back to african roots. Look at villages/towns in Liberia, Lagos and just about any african country: garbage all over the place, sometimes an acre covered with so much garbage no grass can be seen; dead bodies (probably murdered) lying here and there unattended, lack of sanitation practiced as evidenced by pools of liquid probably raw human sewage; and of course endemic violence.
Now look at a western hemisphere country, Haiti: garbage all over the place, dead bodies aplenty, violence aplenty, no sanitary practices leading to outbreaks of disease. In other words, same as africa. Haiti is known to be populated almost exclusively by those who are direct descendants of african slaves who revolted in late 1700s.
Now look at 2005 New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina: garbage everywhere, no dry place didn’t have piles of garbage all over; dead bodies all over, crime outbreaks all over, no sanitation practiced (like the SuperDome toilets were promptly clogged and overflowed all over restroom floors and out into hallways). Look who constitutes the majority of New Orleans; nig nogs.
It looks like the same DNA group is involved each place on earth where this occurs, doesn’t it?
I was in the army in the 1980s when negroes were said to be 20% of the total force. It was always negro rooms, places that were the least “fresh”, “wholesome”, “livable”. There was always something less sanitary about them when they congregated somewhere. Whenever they used the backyard (of barracks) party/barbecue/whatever area, it looked less clean after them than when Whites did.
When you see blacks fighting without shirts it is done to keep the opponent or victim from grabbing their shirt to control the fight.
Reminds me of the time I met ‘Larry’ a 73 year old Jew from Mass while on a trip to Israel. He was contemptuous of Southerners n had bought all the media propaganda about blacks in the South being victims of ‘white supremacist’ (there’s that lovely label that says much about the speaker n zero about the described) prejudice. Larry had never visited the South n regarded it as populated by only ignorant ‘rednecks’ so not worth it. He was totally surprised to hear from me the sheer extent of back on white violence that I had witnesses or been the subject of. He had never heard of black on white violence before n was surprised when I suggested that for the South the Civil War had never really ended but had transformed into a permanent low level ethnic war marked by whites striving to defend themselves from black crime.
I was equally surprised by Larry’s attitude toward Arabs. He was virulently racist n regarded all Arabs as scum n inferior. He had a son in the IDF n he would happily ask IDF soldiers ‘Have you f****d an Arab?’ meaning using a baton. I didn’t approve of his views, but he was good company n as chance had thrown us together we explored Israel together. I’m certain he never did visit the South, n he knew no blacks or Southerners besides me, n, tho he said he believed me about black crime since I spoke from personal experience, I doubt he truly changed his attitude.
Very disturbing article. Thank God we don’t have many Africans here in Australia. The few who were brought here in the last decade to enrich us are almost out of control by now – stealing, assaulting and chimping out in gangs. They need to go back.
The multicult is nonetheless in full swing with 10s of 1000s of mud people becoming Australians every year. The shitlib left insist that they are just as Australian as Aussies of Anglo-Irish descent whose ancestors came here to forge a 1st world country out of dirt 200 years ago.
As for the Aborigines, there are very close similarities to issues with the Native Americans as I understand them. A small minority exist almost normally but many are feral in urban areas, begging, sleeping out and constantly drunk. Those that live in “reservations” in the outback live in violent, drunken dysfunction. They are constantly drunk, destroy all facilities they are given and the violence they inflict on each other, including women and children is horrifying. The first Europeans to come here noted how violent they were even back then and it continues to today – but now they blame it on white privilege. And despite funding for Aboriginal programs costing the taxpayer $30bn per year, they have affirmative action employment! But all cultures are equal – right?.
From a Blog post written some years ago:
When discussing various crimes with our dusky brethren the Negroid often uses the defense “but Whites do it too!” as in “Whites steal bicycles too!” or “Whites murder too!”. To point out the enormous increase in crime frequency between the negroid and the White is to open the door to excuses like “poverty made us do that” or “it is discrimination that made us do that” and such debunked excuses as “underprivileged” have been the underpinning of Black-Run America (BRA) since the beginning. Whole careers and enormous volumes of writing were produced through the 60’ and 70’ and ‘80s attesting to the desire to excuse the negro from his incredible capacity for violence.
Now completely discredited, these writings by left wing sociologists laid the pattern for the excuse making industry today, where for example an 11 year old girl can be kidnapped and dragged into cover to be gang raped and the first 28 young black men that come across a child gang rape scene all join in the rape instead of doing something to stop it. A sample size of 28 random black men, in which not a single one hesitated to rape a defenseless child, is too large to dismiss as unrepresentative. The entire black community standing shoulder to shoulder with the rapists and blaming the victim is too large a number to dismiss as unrepresentative. Although some here will argue that race has nothing to do with crime, it is impossible to imagine 28 young white or Asian men happening on a horrific scene of a young child being raped by grown men and every single one of them joining in the crime instead of trying to stop it.
There is a segment of negroid behavior that is totally unique to them. They OWN it. It is their Signature Crime so to speak. Elderly interracial rape. Negros have found this to be an amusing and rewarding pastime.
“Rape was an insurrectionary act. It delighted me that I was defying and trampling upon the white man’s law, upon his system of values, and that I was defiling his women – and this point, I believe, was the most satisfying to me because I was very resentful over the historical fact of how the white man has used the black woman. I felt I was getting revenge. I started out practicing on black girls in the ghetto where dark and vicious deeds appear not as aberrations or deviations from the norm, but as part of the sufficiency of the Evil of a day. When I considered myself smooth enough, I crossed the tracks and sought out white prey. I did this consciously, deliberately, willfully, methodically.”
(-Elderidge Cleaver-)
This is a facet of the negro mind that few want to explore, certainly not DWL, who cover up the reporting of crimes of the negro at every opportunity! DWL fear a White anger backlash, as well they should, if the facts were made known. A few professionals have had both the opportunity and insight to examine this horrific trend closely. The FBI has for years kept a behavioral psych division which quietly put out papers on various types of crimes. In the words of one of their lead researchers:
Of all the metrics of black violent crime against whites the sexual homicide of elderly white women offers the most compelling evidence of race hatred toward the victim. For starters, the motives of the perp in any sexual homicide of an elderly woman is pure hatred. His victim is largely symbolic. His motive is not lust but extreme hatred.
(Special Agent Mark E. Safarik, a profiler in the Behavioral Analysis Unit at the FBI Academy, published in the May issue of the Journal of Interpersonal Violence)
The study involved a review of 110 offenders who perpetrated the rape and murder of 128 women 60 years and older. The mean age of the victims was 77 and 97% were black on White. The gut wrenching comes in the last paragraph, in the interview section (!) almost buried and forgotten, an aside:
“Based on other reports, Safarik says that there has NEVER been a case of sexual homicide involving a white offender and an elderly black victim in modern times. Yet the sexual homicide of elderly white women by black men is epidemic in comparison.”
Never been a case. Never. So this is an answer to those who say “Whites do it too!”. Negros don’t like people pointing out the negros rape and murder White Grandmothers out of Hate and negros are the only ones who do.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment