Print this post Print this post

Always on the Wrong Side:
US-Chinese Foreign Policy, 1844 to the Present—Part Two

1,681 words

Part 2 of 2 (Part 1 here)


Here I would like to summarize the major factors that resulted in the incorrect and chronically suicidal American approach to China from the early twentieth century to this day. My discussions proceed from the four major subjects of the game, namely the Jewish element, the gentile elites, and the commoners on both the American and Chinese sides.

Jews: It has been a long-formulated and grand strategy for Western Jewry to align itself with China, to form a kind of symbiosis between the two, not just for shared economic interests, or for the shared traits and mentalities which they both see in the other, or for the fact that China remains a devoted disciple of Jewish Communism and still officially lionizes and preaches Marxism in its domestic education system, but most importantly because both view white people with irrepressible hostility, and both regard whites as their archenemy to be beaten down and trampled upon. Taking as much as possible from the whites and selling them out to the Chinese so as to enfeeble the former and empower the latter is thus a tacit common understanding among Jews in the West, and has long been a standard practice for Western Jews in positions of power and influence. Jewry and China may one day have a final showdown in their fierce quest for world dominance, but that day will only arrive over the dead body of the white race.

Gentile elites: American and Western merchants, epitomized by the faithless fat cats of the multinational corporations, are characterized by greed, shallowness, short-sightedness, and decadence. These bigwigs of big business only care about profits, lack a long-term vision, and couldn’t care less about geopolitics, traditional culture, national security, social cohesion, or the welfare of the working class. They are the natural allies of sycophantic totalitarian states like China who offer them opportunities to make money, just as Lenin had mockingly observed that capitalists are willing to sell the noose that will be used to hang them as long as there is profit to be had. Comparatively, the Western missionaries were much less attached to materialistic concerns, but they possessed an avid sense of their religious mission, an admittedly sincere and selfless but ultimately wrongheaded and pathological sense of mission that was detached from any considerations for race and reality. They feel that their doctrines are universally applicable to all non-whites, and this invariably propelled them to aid and empower them, among whom the Chinese were undoubtedly their most capable and self-serving recipient.

Commoners: The masses, both in America and Western Europe, are quite naïve and manipulable from a cultural and geopolitical perspective, as reflected in the eyes of the ruthlessly calculating and cunning Chinese. This make them a perfect target for China’s tongzhan (统战, literally “united front,” meaning using whatever means are necessary to win over the peripheral forces within the enemy’s camp in order to defeat the enemy’s core, and to drive a wedge between different factions on the enemy’s side; in short, to divide and conquer).[1] The astonishing gullibility, credulity, and sentimentality of the Americans have never failed to delight and amaze the Chinese, for whom a game of table tennis, a panda exhibition tour, a Chinese folk concert, or a Peking Opera performance can be politicized and used to brainwash and win the hearts of the simplistic and frivolous Americans, and they have seldom failed to gain facile victories in this regard.

The Chinese side: The “united front”-building, or tongzhan, described above is but one of the many manifestations of a whole array of impressive tools in the cabinet of the Chinese regime, whose prowess when it comes to disguise and deception is well-honed. They are master tacticians when it comes to manipulation and PR. China has always been adept at mounting multifaceted PR offensives by means of a number of differing approaches. The much-trumpeted, so-called “Table Tennis Diplomacy” and “Panda Diplomacy” of the 1970s were both typical examples of a shrewdly-designed tongzhan ploy targeting the American audience, and they were often arranged to accompany more formal political events, such as Nixon’s 1972 visit to China and Deng Xiaoping’s 1979 visit to America, which were choreographed to make the Chinese look more natural and pleasing.

Historical instances abound in this regard, and are simply too numerous to list exhaustively. To cite just two glaring examples, during the early phases of the Chinese-Japanese war, China was eager to pull America into the war on its side, and spared no effort in its vicious propaganda campaigns against Japan, including fabricating atrocities and distorting facts. Both the Chinese nationalist government and the Communists actively conducted such efforts, utilizing their extensive networks in America in collaboration with the liberal mainstream media, as well as America’s own Communist sympathizers and Soviet agents. Chinese operatives held speeches calling on America to go to war with Japan and published incendiary articles spiced with fake photos of Japanese atrocities in eminent American periodicals such as Life, and they received the active support and cooperation of famous American media personalities such as Frank Capra.[2]

Another example is the little-known story of Mao’s garish ingratiation with America near the end of the Second World War in the summer of 1945 for the implicit purpose of deceiving Americans in preparation for his coming fateful confrontation with the nationalists. On July 4, 1945, the official Chinese communist newspaper, the Xinhua Daily, published an editorial that lavishly celebrated Independence Day, to the extent of being rather groveling and obsequious. The editorial’s headline exclaimed “Happy birthday, dear America!” and referred to America as the “hope for mankind” and “the beacon of liberty and democracy,” among other ebullient phrases. What a PR stunt! What a brazen and jaw-dropping tongzhan stratagem! Considering the orthodox anti-American stance of the Chinese Communists at that time and their perpetual condemnation of American imperialism, such an article from them was unthinkable. And yet it happened. Presumably, deceitful ploys such as this helped China to cozy up to the American establishment and managed to touch the juvenile heartstrings of some Americans in high positions, to the grave detriment of America only a few years later. For the Chinese, the means are forever justified by the ends, and it would be a gross understatement to call them a “chameleon.”

Today, besides assiduously striving for political hegemony, pursuing economic domination, seeking military expansion, and pushing for neo-colonialism through immigration all over the world, China is strenuously working to promote new PR campaigns and tongzhan throughout the West, and most of all in America, equipped with an inexhaustible budget from its enormous trade surplus. Government-controlled Chinese media magnates are busy purchasing Hollywood studios, hiring proxies, or setting up outlets to spread the messages dictated by the Chinese regime to the American public. The Chinese government itself has likewise invested billions of US dollar into building its overseas media networks and to expand their influence. China has set up giant billboards in New York’s Times Square, for example, and China’s primary official TV network, CCTV, has set up the China Global Television Network (CGTN) on American soil, which today reaches a large number of viewers. The content of their programs invariably serves the aims of tongzhan: whitewashing and glorifying China, promoting a positive and friendly image of the Chinese regime, and projecting a phony sense of peace and friendship between China and America.

Meanwhile, other NGOs and institutions controlled or financed by the Chinese government, starting with the notorious “Confucius Institute,” which plays a similar role in brainwashing Americans about China, are likewise reaching their tentacles into the American public in the name of educational and cultural exchanges. The same is true of those educational institutions they have set up in America. They often offer to cooperate with the mainstream American media or educational institutions in order to disguise themselves and thus enhance their deceptive effect. They frequently use economic incentives to entice American organizations into speaking favorably of the Chinese regime and to further infiltrate America with the viewpoints of the Chinese Communist Party.

Needless to say, China enjoys so much leeway to operate its evil apparatuses in America with impunity only because it is allowed to do so out of the greed, ignorance, ill intent, and mindless insouciance of the Jews, the gentile elites, and even some common Americans, respectively. The only real solution to the Chinese question in terms of reducing and eventually eliminating its menace to whites and Western civilization is a complete and comprehensive disengagement from China, starting with abolishing global free trade and thus effectively halting international trade with China. This might bring about a few temporary difficulties or inconveniences for the West, but is nevertheless the only truly effective way to save the white nations and to contain the Chinese monster by starving it of all it needs to grow, expand, and commit evil, so that an enervated beast can finally be reined in and tamed.


[1] A united front, aka tongzhan, together with the internal management of the Party and armed struggle, were the three “magical tools” of the Chinese Communist Party, according to Mao. This triadic theory has been inherited by today’s Chinese Communist establishment and is still widely taught in its schools today.

[2] Mark Harris’s book, Five Came Back: A Story of Hollywood and the Second World War, describes a revealing historical episode: the issue of Life magazine published on October 4, 1937 included a photograph, allegedly to decry the Japanese airstrike on the South Railway Station of Shanghai on August 28 of the same year. The famous photo showed a little boy in rags, sitting amidst the ruins of a bombed-out building, apparently after the Japanese air raid on the city. This was widely circulated in the American media as evidence of Japanese brutality. Years later, the director Frank Capra admitted that the photo was his work, and was staged, as the boy was actually put there by the Chinese after the air raid with the express purpose of being photographed as part of a joint operation between the Hollywood film industry and the Chinese government.


  1. Franklin Ryckaert
    Posted October 25, 2017 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

    A China boycotted by the West will simply concentrate on Russia, Asia and Africa for its trade, a market big enough for its needs. But I agree, stopping free trade with China is good for us, as is stopping all Chinese immigration. It all depends on our elites, but those are either indifferent (Gentiles) or hostile (Jews) to our interests. Without a change of elites we cannot win.

    • Riki
      Posted October 27, 2017 at 5:45 pm | Permalink

      Though Russia, Asia, Africa and Latin America have big markets for Chinese products to export, they are much less developed and have a much lower consumption capacity compared with the Western markets with US as a primary example. Up to this day, China has heavily and disproportionately relied on US market for its exports and the trade surplus which China has garnered from its trade with US has been the main source of China’s political, economic surge and military expansion. Thus those non-Western markets you mentioned definitely cannot replace western markets especially the US market for China, and that’s why a nationalist and protectionist trade policy of US, including such measures as restricting trade with China and imposing heavier tariffs and so on, have remained the most feared scenario and the most crucial vulnerability, i.e. “Achilles heel” of China.

      Another crucial point contributing to China’s fear on the trade matter vis-a-vis the West in general and US in particular is that China also desired avidly to acquire and has actually managed to acquire with all dishonest and nasty means important industrial and military technologies in its trade relationships with the Western nations in the last three decades, which it could only do with Russia at a much lower extent, and basically nothing at all in its trade with other third world markets. This technology aspect, besides the financial aspect, greatly corroborates the importance of the West to China, which you obviously seemed to fail to perceive.

  2. Sullivan
    Posted October 25, 2017 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    By the looks of things, the national socialists were right (again!).

    European’s ally in the far east should be the Japanese, they are less racially alien to us than either the Koreans of the Chinese. Tellingly, on the far-right the only prominent Asian author is Yukio Mishima.

    Whether the Japanese would have any interest in helping us is another question.

  3. Posted October 26, 2017 at 7:00 am | Permalink

    Another outstanding piece from Riki in his ongoing efforts to dash buckets of cold water on White Nationalism. I for one am very thankful that we have him to guide us thru the opaque and labyrinthine threat the China poses to us.

    • Riki
      Posted October 27, 2017 at 6:06 pm | Permalink

      Dear friend, many thanks for coming to here to express your support for and appreciation of my humble writings. We haven’t contacted for a while and I guess you must be wondering about my whereabouts these days. The fact is I’ve lost track of and access to DS in recent months since its deplatforming from the old domain as part of the drastic consequences from the debacle. In these days I’d searched hard on the Internet for clues on the new domain name of DS and found a few different answers. But they were only temporarily accessible and lost the accessibility very soon. I felt very frustrated and puzzled but continued to try. In one of my previous comment on an article posted here on CC, I even asked fellow nationalist commentators for relevant information, and actually got two very kind and helpful answers which both gave me a domain name of DS that end with “is”, but this one, again, was only accessible in my initial try, and failed instantly when I tried clicking to open an article in it or clicking “reload” for renewal a few moments later. How strange and perplexing!

      Maybe you can now accurately inform me of the latest and functioning site name of DS provided it does have one like that. Or perhaps it is my current geographic location in China that renders myself unable to access to the new site of DS. Who knows?
      Anyhow, thanks again for your kind and encouraging message. Please take good care of yourself and continue to fight for our righteous, just and noble cause in your own constructive way and with your utmost capacity.

      • Franklin Ryckaert
        Posted October 28, 2017 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

        The Daily Stormer website is blocked again and again and then he has to find a new address. At present it is :

        Andrew Anglin has his own website where you always can find the new address for the Daily Stormer in case it has disappeared again.
        That is :
        Bookmark that one.

        • Riki
          Posted October 28, 2017 at 6:50 pm | Permalink

          Mr. Ryckaert, in spite of your frequent challenging and questioning of my essays or comments, I want to express my sincere gratitude to your voluntary and good-willed assistance in providing me with this valuable information that is important to me. I deeply appreciate and salute your knightly spirit and profound generosity. Many thanks again and my best wishes to you.

      • Obergruppenfuhrer Sm
        Posted November 23, 2017 at 5:06 am | Permalink

        Arigato, nīsan

        Apologies, I didnt see your reply here. If you see this you can reach me at [email protected]
        Or the site you requested can be found here.

        I miss our communication and look forward to your reply


  4. Riki
    Posted October 28, 2017 at 9:21 am | Permalink

    Correction from the author:

    Look, at the end of the paragraph one, the phrase “and the commoners on both the American and Chinese sides.” is a misstatement on my part which might create a misunderstanding. Because I actually discussed not the Chinese commoners, but the official/governmental Chinese practices later in the fourth and last section of this Conclusion part, please dismiss the original phrase and understand it accurately as “the American commoners, and the Chinese side itself”. Thanks.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace