X Marks the SpotTravis LeBlanc
“Grifter” is the closest thing political commentators have to an N-word. As a term of abuse, however, “grifter” is itself much abused. If someone makes any kind of money talking about politics, especially online, he will inevitably be called a “grifter” by someone. People say Nick Fuentes is a grifter because he makes thousands of dollars a week in superchats. Chapo Trap House makes $170,000 through their Patreon. What a bunch of grifters! And if someone sells merchandise, there’s no debate: He is definitely a grifter.
“Grifter” is a particularly annoying epithet when used against people on the Dissident Right because they are often promoting ideas that render them unemployable. If you are going to promote Dissident Right ideas under your own name, you basically have to do it for money unless you are independently wealthy, self-employed, or have a really cool boss.
I am inclined to believe that most political e-celebs are driven primarily driven by a desire for fame and recognition than money. They just want to be a somebody. It would be more accurate to call these people “attention whores” or “spotlight chasers.” A drive for attention and notoriety is often a more destructive impulse than being motivated by money.
If money is a factor at all for these people, it would be more in the sense that not having to have a day job is appealing. That’s not really a character flaw, because being able to make a living doing something you enjoy is everyone’s dream. That’s not quite the same as being motivated by pure avarice. A lot of e-celebs could probably make more money with a normal 9 to 5 job.
To me, a “grifter” is someone who promotes ideas insincerely and strategically in order to maximize profitability. No matter how much money someone makes, he is not a grifter if he actually believes what he says. The whole point of calling someone a grifter is to avoid having to address his points or explain his success by suggesting that he doesn’t actually believe what he says. The term is hand-wave, and 9 times out of 10, it is used by player haters. I’ve never seen someone call someone less successful than himself a grifter. Actual, self-conscious frauds are rare.
That said, actual frauds aren’t exactly unicorns, either.
Gavin McInnes was a grifter because he knew the truth. He wrote for TakiMag alongside John Derbyshire and Steve Sailer. He used to go to the annual VDare Christmas party. And yet he would frequently argue against White Nationalism by saying stupid things like, “All-white countries are not ideal because they tend to be more socialist. Just look at Scandinavia!”
I understand that, depending on your level of prominence, there are limits to what people can say and still pursue activism at that level. I respect the fact that there are limits to what Tucker Carlson can say and to what someone can say on YouTube. It’s absurd to expect someone to kamikaze himself in the name of purity when he is doing good work. But there is a big difference between avoiding or sugarcoating dangerous topics and actively arguing against those who are addressing them. Gavin crossed the line from the former to the latter way too many times.
Hasan Piker, with his $3 million mansion, is also a grifter, but the fact that he has money isn’t what makes him one. It’s the ostentatious displays of wealth and his drive for extravagant material comfort that calls his credibility and sincerity as a spokesman against greed into question. Certainly, someone who lives in such opulence is probably not going to know the price of milk and has no business claiming to be a champion of the working class.
Then you have Jacob Wohl, who puts food on the table simply by telling ridiculous lies about various Democrats. Jacob Wohl is pure grift, as his whole shtick is promoting stories that he knows damn well are not true. I’m not sure how he manages to translate that into a paycheck, but apparently, he does.
The problem with calling someone a grifter is that you can’t see into someone’s heart. Sometimes a grifter will slip up, however, and accidentally reveal that he knows he is peddling bullshit.
Such an incident happened last week when revered angry negro and viciously anti-white race hustler Ibram Xylophone Kendi — he goes by Ibram X. Kendi, because there was already an Ibram Kendi registered at the E-Celeb’s Guild — accidentally disproved “white privilege.”
Kendi tweeted out a news story on Friday about white students increasingly listing themselves as non-white on college applications. He added, “More than a third of White students lied about their race on college applications, and about half of these applicants lied about being Native American. More than three-fourths of these students who lied about their race were accepted.”
I do this as well, quite honestly. I always mark “Other” or “Two or more races” on applications. I have a smidgen of non-white ancestry dating back to the early nineteenth century, when there was a severe shortage of white women in the Louisiana Territory and my great-great-great-etc.-grandpappy Jean LeBlanc got lonely at night. Besides, Cajuns are a legally recognized minority, but they never list “Cajun” as one of the options on the form, so I put “Other.” Besides, liberals love telling me that white people don’t exist, so why should I be penalized for belonging to a group that doesn’t actually exist?
Once Ibram X-Ray Kendi realized that the study did not exactly make the point he was trying to make — or at least not perfectly — he deleted the tweet shortly afterward.
What was the point that Ibram Xenon Kendi thought he was making? Mr. Xylophone thought he was pointing out the fact that white people lie, and that as a result of their lies, they are taking away seats at colleges that rightfully belong to people of color.
Mr. Xylophone was on anti-white autopilot, however, and did not think more deeply about the story’s second-order implications. There were two elements in it which worked against everything Kendi said. First, if “white privilege” is a real thing, and if the establishment really is biased in favor of whites, then why would white people feel the need to lie? Secondly, if the system is biased against minorities, then why does lying about being a minority have such a high success rate (81%)?
People were quick to point out this blunder.
Granted, there are occasions when the data will appear on the surface to go against your position. We hear anti-whites say things to us such as, “There is more genetic diversity within races than between races” and that that “Immigrants commit fewer crimes than native-born Americans.” Then you have to explain why those facts, while perhaps true, do not actually prove what they believe it proves, and/or are not actually inconsistent with a White Nationalist worldview.
In this case, however, Mr. Xylophone made no serious attempt to explain how these factoids were consistent with “white privilege” theory. His deletion of the tweet was ultra-damning. I’m sure he would like you to believe that addressing such arguments is not worth his time, but chances are that Mr. Xylophone knew as well as everyone else that there is no counter-argument.
After The Post Millennial ran an article about Mr. Xylophone’s stunningly hilarious own goal, Kendi was forced to respond:
“They lie about what I said to defend the lying of White college applicants.” Nigga, they screenshotted your tweet! There is your statement right there, word for word! At most, Mr. Xylophone might claim that people are lying about what he meant by what he said, but to say that people are lying about what he said is just straight gaslighting.
This is the closest Mr. Xylophone comes to circling the square. “Just because white people think that doesn’t mean it’s true.” How do you know POCs are the delusional ones? You would think that societal insiders would have a better grasp of how society works than societal outsiders.
And this still doesn’t explain how white people came to that conclusion, nor does it explain the high rate of success for people who do lie about being POCs.
This might be true, but the idea that these disparities are the result of systemic or institutional bias is still unfounded and undercut by the statistics that Mr. Xylophone has himself cited. But this all begs the question: If those stats are consistent with Mr. Xylophone’s worldview, and his main point was that whites are liars, then why delete the tweet?
Occam’s razor here is that Ibram Xylitol Ibram is full of shit, knows he is full of shit, and has managed to become a millionaire in the process. If there is anyone who deserves the title of “grifter,” it is the xylophone man.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Is Trav from Louisiana? My family was originally from Acadiana as well! I have many Indian ancestors, as I know from all the historically famous ancestors I have in Louisiana and Canada who had only half caste sons, yet I’ve never claimed a nonwhite identity, like Pocahontas. Although I sometimes wear a breechclout and headdress when partying, but that’s another affair. I think it dishonorable to lie or fake ones identity. I would simply accept the next rung down on the ladder. I recall many students in high school claimed Hispanic ancestry in order to become “ Hispanic scholars” on the psat, and many of them got it. These were all high aryan individuals, of course, but it shows how powerful anti white incentives were even then.
I would also think it dishonorable to use race based affirmative action if I were nonwhite on my application. I might simply mark white. Does that mean all whites should mark Asian?
In the rare event I have had to fill out paperwork asking about race, I have been ticking “other” and writing in “Anglo Saxon”. It’s gotten me a look or two which made it completely worth it.
Considering how many self loathing, white woketards there are out here who are convinced he’s an American thought leader of the highest degree and who are willing to throw millions of dollars at this semi literate con man, I’d suggest “X Spots The Mark” would be a more appropriate title to the article.
I think it’s great White students put down another race to assist in their applications. Is it dishonest ? Yes. Does it go against our morals ? Perhaps. But the ‘level’ playing field hasn’t been that way for a long time. This helps destroy their golden egg of affirmative action and renders it impotent – they are just pissed Whites have now had enough and are now using the system just as they do.
Anything which can help break down the current system and return it to meritocracy is welcome in my opinion.
Perhaps if enough whites negate affirmative action it will become necessary to institute an ancestry test to identify genuine Persons of Colour? I am sure that 23&me would be delighted to provide free assay kits: Dr Kendi could be deployed to reassure the public.
“Chapo Trap House makes $170,000 through their Patreon”
Is that what they clear in a year? Or a week?
If that’s what they clear in a week, I need to rethink my views on communism!
Whatever it takes to win! I think some people are forgetting that the jews want to wipe us off the face of the earth, and they will do anything to accomplish that goal. Myself, I lie, cheat, and steal every chance I get; we are not dealing with an honorable enemy. Honorable behavior is something that we extend to racially loyal people of our own tribe.
Hmm, this would be an interesting topic for a philosophical essay! I do see your point. But then again there is a lot of deceit and infighting among the white nationalists, so much so that I’m not sure what’s really going on, lol. The crooked timber of humanity…but yes, let’s explore who is worthy of FairPlay and honorable treatment and who not!
It is a sticky subject, but the rule of thumb should be only those racially loyal in our tribe are deserving of honorable treatment. Yes, there is some gray area now, where we have to make judgement calls, so many of our people are clueless out there. As time goes by, and we are reduced to minorities in our countries, when people are forced to choose sides, it will be easier to determine whom to extend honorable behavior to.
Am I the only one who finds it a little odd that Kendi is capitalizing White, while many White advocates (in above Tweets and comments here) do not? Seems like the Xylophone man would’ve led the charge to lowercase our people.
@Bold Inq – The capitalization — or should I say, the failure to capitalize — White, as in White people, is my most frequent comment on dissident Right forums. I even frequently see comments the capitalize “Black” (as in people), and then lower-case “White” as in people!
The definition of “white” (lower-case): noun. The achromatic color of maximum lightness; the color of objects that reflect nearly all light of all visible wavelengths; the complement or antagonist of black, the other extreme of the neutral gray series. Although typically a response to maximum stimulation of the retina, the perception of white appears always to depend on contrast.
The white or nearly white part, as.
The albumen of an egg.
I am a White person — an American White person. Not “white”, as in reflecting all color, or the albumen of an egg!
I think you’re being unfair to Gavin. There is a difference between punching right at people who are more dissident than you, and simply disagreeing with them. Gavin can believe that ethnic homogeneity isn’t important and still associate with people who do.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Edit your comment