1,562 words
In 2010, Christopher Nolan released one of the greatest science fiction films of all time: Inception. Inception is stunningly artful and imaginative, as well as dramatically gripping and emotionally powerful. (See my review here.)
Then, four years later, Nolan released Interstellar, which is almost as good. It may seem silly not to want to “spoil” a film that has been out for six years, but if you haven’t seen it, I want you to see it. Thus I am going to talk about the basic story and themes while skirting large chunks of the plot.
Interstellar is set sometime late in the late 21st century. Global technological civilization has undergone a collapse. There has been war, famine, and technological regression. And it is only getting worse, because some sort of blight is destroying plant life all over the globe. Those who do not starve will suffocate as the blight destroys the oxygen supply.
But the ultimate end is a closely guarded secret. Official policy in what remains of the United States is that things will get better, but the current generation are caretakers. They need to hold on, produce food, and have children to repopulate the earth. School textbooks teach that the moon landing was a hoax, while NASA still exists, working in secret on a way to perpetuate the human species on other planets. Plan A is to save the people on Earth by finding them a new home. Plan B is to send human embryos to a new world.
Nearly fifty years before the events of the film, a wormhole appeared near Saturn giving mankind a path to a new galaxy. NASA managed to locate twelve potentially habitable worlds on the other side. Ten years before the film’s present, they dispatched scientists to those worlds. They called them the Lazarus missions, after a man who came back from the dead. Most of the scientists were never heard from again. But some promising data came back. Now they need to send a follow-up mission, which will be headed by Joseph Cooper (Matthew McConaughey).
Three planets show the most promise, named for the scientists who were sent to them: Miller, Mann, and Edmunds.

You can buy Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch’s CENSORED Guide to the Movies here
Miller’s planet is near a black hole. It is covered with shallow water, but the gravitational forces create mile high waves that relentlessly sweep its surface. There is no life. Because of its proximity to the black hole, time passes at different rates on the planet in orbit above it. The landing team is gone only three hours, but for the rest of the universe, 23 years have passed. The scientist who remained on the ship has grown old and the families of the landing party have, of course, changed dramatically. The children they left behind have become adults and have had children of their own, while people in their parents’ generation have died. The whole sequence is enormously imaginative and deeply moving.
The next planet was explored by Dr. Mann (Matt Damon), who claimed that it was habitable. We never see the surface of the planet, because Dr. Mann has made his base on a cloud. The planet is surrounded by layers of solid frozen clouds, which is again highly imaginative and surprising. Mann’s world is not, however, habitable. Dr. Mann has gone mad in his solitude. He sent back false data simply because he wanted people to rescue him. He was willing to risk the future of the whole human race out of sheer selfishness.
Only Edmunds’ planet is left. But the crew does not have the fuel to get there. Much of it had been burned up in the 23 years they orbited Miller’s world. So Cooper takes the ship back to the black hole, hoping to use its gravitational force to sling the ship to Edmunds’ planet. But Cooper has to stay behind. He detaches his small lander and falls into the black hole while the ship speeds its way to Edmunds’ planet. Their encounter with the black hole has taken only a few minutes, but 51 years have passed back on Earth.
After being sucked into the black hole, Cooper is deposited back our solar system, near Saturn. He discovers that in the last half-century, humanity has built an armada of vast space ships that will eventually pass through the wormhole to Edmunds’ planet, which will be humanity’s new home.
In an incredibly moving final sequence, Cooper meets Murphy, the ten-year-old daughter he left behind, now an aged woman surrounded by her vast brood of children and grandchildren. As a child, Murphy begged her father to stay and resented him for years after his departure. But she is at peace, because he helped save her and the entire human race. She tells him that he should not stay around and watch his own child die. He needs to go back out there, to Edmunds’ planet, where Dr. Amelia Brand (Anne Hathaway) is waiting in hibernation; he needs to find her, awaken her, and help prepare humanity’s new home.
Interstellar, like all of Nolan’s movies, is a deeply serious work. There are four themes that are especially poignant.
The first is the tension between rootedness and exploration. The world of Interstellar has officially given up on space exploration. They are pledged to be caretakers on a planet that is becoming uninhabitable. Their political and educational system is dedicated to constricting people’s horizons. Caretakers live within their limits. Explorers go beyond and set new limits. Cooper used to be a NASA pilot, but now he is a farmer, and he hates it. He wants to be among the stars, not scraping a living from the dirt. As Interstellar shows, however, on a dying Earth, one can’t be a caretaker unless one is an explorer. To survive, one must aim at more than survival. But, then again, the ultimate goal is a new place to put down roots.
The second theme is the difficulty of saying goodbye, especially when Cooper leaves his children behind on a mission from which he may never return. A great deal of Interstellar’s emotional power derives from the pain of separation, exacerbated by the time differentials. (One of the best traits of James Gray’s Ad Astra was its meditation on what traits of character and beliefs would be necessary to sustain such explorers. See my review here.)
The third important theme is the role of lies in society. The school system teaches that the Moon landing was a hoax, but it funds NASA in secret. The ultimate fate of the Earth is top secret. Amelia Brand’s father, Professor Brand (played by Michael Caine), claims to be working on Plan A, but has concealed the fact that he has failed to solve the “gravity problem” that will allow mankind to leave the Earth en masse. He lied to give people hope. The robots have an honesty setting, because it is understood that perfect honesty dissolves society. This a theme in The Dark Knight Trilogy as well.
Finally, Interstellar is about racial survival, which is a particularly poignant issue for whites, since we are on the path to extinction. When faced with extinction, the feminist idea that having a career grants higher status than motherhood is quietly forgotten. Plan B presupposes that women will bear enough children to make exponential growth possible. And although Cooper’s daughter Murphy plays a very important role in saving all of humanity, she also has a large family surrounding her at the end of her life. (The adult Murphy is played by Jessica Chastain. The aged Murphy is played by Ellen Burstyn.)
Interstellar is not flawless. For some reason, McConaughey insists on speaking with a twangy, mush-mouthed accent that none of his other family use, so it just seems fake. Time travel and an almost literal deus ex machina also play important roles, which I found annoying. I have no scientific quibbles because this is science fiction, so the jargon only has to sound good. And it does.
But the virtues of this film are immense. The story is gripping, the script brilliant, and the acting is uniformly excellent. This is my favorite McConaughey role. Michael Caine, Matt Damon, Jessica Chastain, and Ellen Burstyn are all outstanding. The sets, equipment, and special effects are also quite dazzling.
Special mention is due to Hans Zimmer. Frankly, I am not a fan, but this is his best score. To my ears, it sounds like the took the organ pedal from the opening fanfare of Richard Strauss’s Also Sprach Zarathustra and turned it into a minimalistic but often emotionally shattering accompaniment.
I’ve said quite a lot about this movie, but I guarantee that if you watch it for the first time, it will still be filled with surprises. In a time of social distancing and immense anxiety over the coronavirus pandemic, Interstellar is the best kind of escape: imaginative, enthralling, cathartic, and inspiring.
If you want to support our work, please send us a donation or superchat (paid comment) by going to our Entropy page and selecting “offline super chat.” Entropy allows you to donate any amount from $3 and up. All superchats will be read and commented upon in the next episode of Counter-Currents Radio, which airs every Friday.
This article originally appeared at The Unz Review.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
8 comments
Hmm, interesting. Some of the movie was lost on me, especially the aspect of hope and illusion being important in human life. Too true, too true! I would like to hear this theme elaborated for the Batman movies.
What do you guys think about the notion that the moon landing was faked? Is this the actual position of the film makers, do you think? There seems to be an undercurrent in pop culture of alluding to the falsification of the moon landing. Many people believe that 2001 and other Kubrick films have esoteric symbologies about this, and after connecting (just) Eyes Wide Shut with the epstein affair, I see Kubrick as completely capable of this kind of thing. Alternatively, is it that one of these “people” has that as a hobby horse and that’s the origin of it. That point seems very important to me, what is actually meant by that.
Another aspect of the “IT” here is the relative exile various victims: “Moon” “the Martian” “dispatches from Pluto” “interstellar” lol
Interstellar is a wonderful film. Besides what Trevor has mentioned, I think the screenplay lent itself to a range of emotions (in the characters and audience) that really makes this film stand out.
As a person 76 years of age with beginning stages of COPD, I am quite happy the government of our state — Socialist California – has ordered everyone to stay home except ‘essential workers’ (which begs the question, what are ‘unessential’ workers and what is their worth?). My two socialist-leaning roommates are concerned with the ‘poor people who live paycheck to paycheck’, while I politely remind them I worked 53 years as an office drone and still managed to save money — a habit I habitually preach to others to no avail — and which now affords me some security in these times. I am serious — if white people do not have the sense to save money, and set the precedent for the other wandering minorities in our midst, we have no hope of survival. If anything, I certainly hope the Corona Virus will shock people into ‘setting aside something for the future’ as my dear German mother frequently admonished me. It is true, the bank account cannot save my life if this virus somehow ‘lands on me’ — and that is exactly what it does — but it makes life easier now to keep the roof over my head to avoid it as rationally as possible. This never-ending battle between Socialism and Capitalism really comes done to one idea — either you will live according to state decree as Socialism provides your living for you, or you will be free under Capitalism to gather your own money in your own way and SAVE IT and keep it for your future and that of your children. Socialists would never dare say anything like this, but this is the truth — oh, well, at least as how me and my wearisome old mama see it. But I firmly believe that the people who keep their lives together financially are the support of Civilization, and I hope there will be enough of them still living to reassemble our economy in the near future.
Oh, heavens, I’ve filed my comment under the wrong story. It was meant for the post on COPD. Mea culpa.
You had a German rocket: of course you went to the moon.
@Utgard Loki
The moon landing hoax began as Soviet “sour grapes” propaganda, which I discuss here:
https://www.returnofkings.com/117722/3-pieces-of-kgb-propaganda-americans-still-believe-today
After five decades, the disinformation keeps going! A movie about a faked Mars mission sort of added fuel to the fire too. Since you mentioned Kubrick, we can see his idea of what the moon was going to look like early in 2001: A Space Odyssey. He, and other filmmakers, typically showed the moon as being much more craggy than it actually is.
I connected with your message because I also had someone who mentioned the values that your mother lived and taught you. Yes, it is absolutely essential to be able to have a degree of freedom by having a reserve of money or other comparable resources. It makes life easier the older we get and it makes us see more clearly as well. Again, I appreciate your post greatly and wish other’s on this forum would take it to heart.
Forgive me my oversight, but my reply was to Alexander O.”s post on the value of having some resources when one gets older..
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment