Print this post Print this post

Nicolás Gómez Dávila, Unknown Reactionary

Nicolás_Gómez_Dávila1,963 words

There are two purposes for this article. The first is to introduce the ideas of Nicolás Gómez Dávila to the English-speaking American and European Right. The second is to motivate a more profound approach to his works, in their original Spanish editions and in Italian and German translations. (Sadly, the English translation is deficient.)

His Life

Colombia, like most South American countries, is a state with a high level of miscegenation; we can safely say that less than 15% of the total population could be considered white. This group includes mostly descendants of white Spaniards and descendants of other Europeans, like Italians and Germans, who chose to settle in Colombia instead of migrating to countries with more European population like Argentina or Chile.

This small white population usually — but not always — occupies the upper economic and social levels of Colombian society. The ones who don’t belong to these levels can be found in Colombia’s southwest and central small towns. Needless to say, this white population is not racially conscious, and they are marrying and procreating with non-whites prolifically.

nicolasgomezdavilainhislibrary2Nicolás Gómez Dávila was born on May 18, 1913, in the city of Bogota, into a white family that belonged to the upper socio-economic levels of the city. He was a descendant of Antonio Nariño, one of the white leaders of the independence movement in Colombia (then known as Nueva Granada). When he was six years old his family moved to Paris, where he studied in a Benedictine school until a severe case of pneumonia forced him to be home schooled with private tutors. He obtained a solid classic education by learning classic languages (Latin and Greek) and modern languages (English, French, and German). When he was 23 years old he came back to Bogota, married, and never left the country again (with the exception of a six months stay in Europe), until his death in May 17, 1994.

He spent his whole life in a voluntary seclusion inside his home library, surrounded by a collection of more than 30,000 volumes, where he employed his time reading and writing. The Italian Franco Volpi, one of the most devout promoters of Gómez Dávila’s thought in Europe, condensed his life in this sentence: “Nació, escribió, murió”[1] (Born, Wrote, Died).

His Works

Almost all of Gómez Dávila’s writings are collections of aphorisms called — in Spanish — Escolios. Escolios comes from the Greek scholión, which literally means commentary. This term was used in old manuscripts for commentaries made between the lines by someone other than the original author of the text. These escolios have been compiled into his main works: Escolios a un Texto Implícito I, Escolios a un Texto Implícito II, Nuevos Escolios a un Texto Implícito I, Nuevos Escolios a un Texto Implícito II, and Sucesivos Escolios a un Texto Implícito.

Gómez Dávila himself gives us two reasons for this type of writing. The first is a quote used as a kind of warning on the first page of his complete works:

“A hand, a foot, a leg, a head,
Stood for the whole to be imagined”
— William Shakespeare, The Rape of Lucrece

The intention of this quote is clear. Gómez Dávila gives the reader fragments and pieces, and it’s the reader’s job to assemble them into a coherent body of thought.

We can find the second reason in Escolios I, in which he affirms “Escribir corto para concluir antes de hastíar”[2] (write curtly to conclude before weariness). This type of writing might be short in length but it is deep in content. An educated reader inevitably recalls Nietzsche’s aphorisms while reading Dávila’s Escolios.

His Thought

nicolasgomezdavilaoldThe influences on Gómez Dávila’s thought are easy to trace from the books in his library, the most notorious being Niccolò Machiavelli, Friedrich Nietzsche, Justus Möser, Konstantin Leontiev, Joseph de Maistre, Donoso Cortés, Maurice Barrès, and Charles Maurras.

Nicolás Gómez Dávila describes his own position as reactionary. Reaction could be described as a Weltanschaaung because it encompasses attitudes about every aspect of the world and human life. Gómez Dávila describes it in a certain number of escolios, but the most beautiful definition is given with a highly poetical twist: “El reaccionario neto no es soñador de pasados abolidos, sino cazador de sombras sagradas sobre colinas eternas”[3]: “The pure reactionary is not a dreamer of abolished pasts, but a hunter of holy shadows upon eternal hills.”

Is the reactionary a man of the Right? Gómez Dávila gives us the answer: “Aún la derecha de cualquier derecha me parece siempre demasiado a la izquierda”[4]: “Even the Right of any Right looks to me always too far on the Left.” From this Escolio we can see that he believed in the traditional Right/Left political dichotomy, wherein the Right represents order, hierarchy, and aristocracy, and the Left chaos, equality, and democracy.

nicolasgomezdavilainhislibraryFranco Volpi describes the Reactionary as “. . . aquel que está en contra de todo porque no existe nada que merezca ser conservado”[5]: “. . . he who’s against everything because there is nothing that deserves to be preserved.” We partially agree with this definition because, while the reactionary is indeed against everything, he’s not a nihilist because everything that he’s against comes from the modern world. The modern world, in all his forms, is the reactionary’s number 1 enemy. Democracy, humanism, equality, atheism, socialism, Marxism, Capitalism, vulgarity, and decadence are the tangible manifestations of this world.

The modern world is a cesspool of vices and decadence, which wants to establish them as the norm: “. . . el mundo moderno nos exigue que aprobemos lo que ni siquiera debería atreverse a pedir que toleraramos”[6]: “. . . the modern world requires us that we approve what it shouldn’t ask us to tolerate.” This escolio, written sometime before 1977, has become truer with every passing day, as every form of depravity and corruption is promoted by the modern world and those who are behind it . . . and the final goal of this agenda is very clear.

Modern man is a vulgar being who lacks all virtue and heroism. He is the mass-man, using the term of José Ortega y Gasset. He’s the Untermensch: “Los antiguos veían en el héroe histórico o mítico, en Alejandro o en Aquiles, el módulo de la vida humana. El gran hombre era paradigmático, su existencia ejemplar. El patrón del demócrata, al contrario, es el hombre vulgar. El modelo democrático debe rigurosamente carecer de todo atributo admirable”[7]: “The ancients saw in the historical or mythical hero, in Alexander or Achilles, the center module of human life. The great man was a paradigm and his existence exemplary. On the contrary, the democratic pattern is the vulgar man. The democratic model must rigorously lack of any admirable attribute.”

Modernity and its golem, modern man, are literally the destroyers of worlds: “El moderno destruye más cuando construye que cuando destruye”[8]: “The modern [man] destroys more when [he] builds than when [he] destroys.” We can see in this escolio that the agenda and final goal of the modern world were clear in Nicolás Gómez Dávila’s mind.

Of course, modernity’s favorite form of government is democracy, which is “. . . el regimen politico donde el ciudadano confía los intereses públicos a quienes no confiaría jamás sus intereses privados”[9]: “. . . the political regime where the citizen trusts the public interest to those who he will never trust his private interests”; and in the eyes of Gómez Dávila, Democracy is even “a metaphysical perversion.”[10]

But, what is the ultimate goal of the Reactionary in this world that he despises? Gómez Dávila couldn’t be more clear about it: “. . . izquierdistas y derechistas meramente se disputan la posesión de la sociedad industrial. El reaccionario anhela su muerte”[11]: “. . . leftists and rightists only argue about the ownership of the industrial society. The Reactionary yearns for its death.” The reactionary wants nothing less than the destruction of the modern world.

Nicolás Gómez Dávila, being a devout Catholic, was also highly critical of modern atheism by affirming that “todo fin diferente de Dios nos deshonra”[12]: “every goal different from God dishonors us” and that we must “Creer en Dios, confiar en Cristo”[13]: “Believe in God, trust in Christ.” This spiritual aspect of life is what provides an adequate interpretation of it: “si no heredamos una tradicion espiritual que la interprete, la experiencia de la vida nada enseña”[14]: “if we do not inherit a spiritual tradition which interprets it, life experience teaches nothing.”

Also on the subject of religion, there is a highly suggestive escolio that says “Más que cristiano, soy un Pagano que cree en Cristo[15]: “Rather than a Christian, I am a Pagan who believes in Christ.” This immediately brings to mind Julius Evola’s “Catholic paganism” and James C. Russell’s writings about Germanized Christianity, which present something very different from the creed of universalism, equality, tolerance, and love.

Was Nicolás Gómez Dávila racially conscious or aware of the Jewish problem? The only escolio that could hint at an answer is: “El antropólogo actual, bajo la mirada severa de los demócratas, trota rápidamente sobre las diferencias étnicas como sobre ascuas”[16]: “The modern anthropologist, under the severe gaze of democrats, scampers quickly over ethnic differences as over hot coals.” The first aspect of this escolio to keep in mind is that he uses the term ethnic instead of the real term, race. Ethnic is the usual euphemism used for people when they don’t want to upset those who are not of our race. We can only speculate that Gómez Dávila didn’t want to hurt the feelings of some cafe au lait acquaintance, because he lived in a highly mongrelized country, and it is plausible that there was even some miscegenation in his own family.


The reactionary is different from modern humanity; he is strong, spiritual, religious, and aristocratic. He stands above and looks down upon the common beliefs, thoughts, wishes, and desires of modern man. He hates the modern world and wants its destruction. Despite not being explicitly aware of race or the Jewish problem, Gómez Dávila’s writings are valuable and insightful. He is obligatory reading for every man of the Right. 


In Spanish:

Nicolás Gómez Dávila, Escolios a un Texto Implícito, Selección (Bogotá, Colombia: Villegas Editores, 2002).

___________, Escolios a un Texto Implícito, Obra Completa , 4 vols. (Bogotá, Colombia: Villegas Editores, 2005). This includes the following works: Escolios a un Texto Implícito I, Escolios a un Texto Implícito II, Nuevos Escolios a un Texto Implícito I, Nuevos Escolios a un Texto Implícito II and Sucesivos Escolios a un Texto Implícito.

___________, Textos 1 (Bogotá, Colombia: Villegas Editores, 2002).

In German:

___________, Einsamkeiten. Glosen und Text in einem (Vienna: Karolinger Verlag, 1987).

___________, Auf verlorenen Posten. Neue Scholioen zu einem inbegriffenen Text (Vienna: Karolinger Verlag, 1992).

___________, Aufzeichnungen des Besiegten. Fortgesetzte Scholien zu einem inbegriffenen Text (Vienna-Leipzig: Karolinger Verlag, 1994).

In Italian:

___________, In Margine a un Testo Implicito (Milan: Adelphi Edizioni S.P.A, 2001).


1. Franco Volpi, El Solitario de Dios (Bogotá, Colombia, Villegas Editores, 2005), 19. This is a little book in which the author wrote a short biography and a short introduction for the ideas of Gómez Davila; and was published together with Davila’s complete works.

2. Nicolás Gómez Dávila, Escolios a un Texto Implícito I (Bogotá, Colombia, Villegas Editores, 2005), 42.

3. Escolios a un Texto Implícito I, 73.

4. Nicolás Gómez Dávila, Escolios a un Texto Implícito II (Bogotá, Colombia, Villegas Editores, 2005), 221.

5. Franco Volpi, Un Ángel Cautivo en el Tiempo (Bogotá, Colombia, Villegas Editores, 2002), 489.

This short text is the epilogue of Gómez Davila’s Escolios a un Texto Implícito Selección, a short (400 pages) selection of some Escolios.

6. Escolios a un Texto Implícito II, 102.

7. Escolios a un Texto Implícito I, 237.

8. Escolios a un Texto Implícito I, 204.

9. Escolios a un Texto Implícito II, 164.

10. Escolios a un Texto Implícito II, 336.

11. Nicolás Gómez Dávila, Nuevos Escolios a un Texto Implícito I (Bogotá, Colombia, Villegas Editores, 2005), 189.

12. Escolios a un Texto Implícito I, 82.

13. Escolios a un Texto Implícito I, 25.

14. Escolios a un Texto Implícito II, 333.

15. Escolios a un Texto Implícito I, 201

16. Escolios a un Texto Implícito I, 372.

Thanks to R.H for the proofreading.


This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , . Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  1. AE
    Posted February 25, 2016 at 5:27 am | Permalink

    Not sure why it’s “needless to say” that the middle or low-class whites aren’t racially conscious.

    That said, I appreciate the translations and it would be nice to see more.

    • Gustav Bjornstrand
      Posted March 1, 2016 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

      While this is so – and I am sure you are aware of this – Colombia as in numerous Latino countries, has the long-standing tradition of concubinage. A man from an upper echelon who takes a concubine from a lower strata (while maintaining a wife and his presentable family). It is a strange phenomenon overall.

      I have noticed – and many others have noticed – that Colombia struggles with issues of ‘identity’ on many different levels. In the swiftly shifting economic and cultural environment of the present it seems that the government seeks to impose a model of pluralism and inclusivity. And the technocrats of Colombia’s guiding class is employing – successfully – the egalitarian model of American PR/propaganda.

      It would be very hard, as I see things, except ‘behind closed doors’, to speak openly about race in the present dispensation.

      In order to defend ‘racial consciousness’ at the level required – and as it is presented on Counter-Currents for example – requires a whole intellectual and philosophical preparation. I find that so many that I know here are simply not prepared enough to entertain those ideas. So, without a strong philosophical and idea-base, one just goes with the flow of the present …

  2. Proofreader
    Posted February 25, 2016 at 5:33 am | Permalink

    This is a good short introduction to Nicolás Gómez Dávila’s thought.

    From his unusual choice of a pen name, I presume that that the author of this article admires H. P. Lovecraft.

    From memory, I think Le Réactionnnaire authentique (Éditions du Rocher, 2005) includes a reference to race — I think it was the one cited above — and a reference to Judaism, but I’d have to look it up.

  3. Robert
    Posted February 25, 2016 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    I would recommend any reader to download “Don Colacho’s Aphorisms” PDF (which can be found on the Wikipedia page, about 388 pages!) and make a private print-on-demand book from The same with the anonymous English translation PDF of Celine’s Trifles for a Massacre!

  4. Petronius
    Posted February 26, 2016 at 9:51 am | Permalink

    Davilà’s aphorisms are an inexhaustible treasure box of thought.

    There are several Escolios which are more explicit about racial differences. There is for example one, where he says, that racists are wrong to believe in “pure” races, and anti-racists are wrong in believing the ingredients of the cocktail do not matter.

  5. Max
    Posted February 26, 2016 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    For the Italian readers I would also recommend an excellent book with a truly inspiring selection of Davila’s aphorisms entitled “Pensieri antimoderni” (Edizioni di Ar, 2007).

  6. Sartor
    Posted February 28, 2016 at 6:54 am | Permalink

    Thanks for this article. I was totally unaware of Davila. The erudition of your contributors never ceases delight and surprise.

  7. Gustav Bjornstrand
    Posted February 28, 2016 at 5:59 pm | Permalink

    As I live in Colombia, and snooping in used book stores had I think come across titles by Gomez Davila yet never having read them, this is a very interesting source for conservative and radical thought. I’ve reached out to some booksellers to see if any of these titles can be gotten.

    I would bet that when he used the term ‘etnias’ he likely meant ethnicities in the sense of cultural/biological differences between people and less purely biological difference alone. Perhaps similar to Evola’s position, if I understand it.

    I’d also incline to believe that his statement about being a pagan who believes in Christ refers to a confessional fact: a man who sees himself as an untransformed pagan and ‘Christ’ as the transforming agent. Well, that based on my reading of the snippits of Spanish text.

    Colombia now, after many years frozen in civil confict is now positioned to move radically *forward* in economic terms. The model is of course the American economic one. The social ideal is similar to that of the American model: all ‘etnias’ pictured together, the same, on the verge of receiving all the commercial goods the new malls can provide.

    I’d suggest that except behind closed doors it would be next to impossible to have an open conversation about race or ‘ethnicity’ in Colombia today. Social animosities are too close to the surface. But I’d also say that Colombians are quite ‘race conscious’. It would be hard to describe to someone outside this culture though. Conscious on one hand, silent for many good reasons.

    • Gustav Bjornstrand
      Posted March 1, 2016 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

      I checked on the Libreria Nacional website and the Escolios are available, at COP 170,000. The used booksellers I know don’t seem to have any of the titles. I am the Eje Cafetero and don’t get up to Bogota that often in any case. It would be a boon indeed to meet someone here – amid the forsakenness – to speak about these very interesting topics. Perhaps Greg would not mind purveying my email to you.

  8. n
    Posted February 29, 2016 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    See in german also:
    Nicolás Gómez Dávila Notas. Unzeitgemäße Gedanken

    Berlion (Matthes & Seitz) 2005

  9. Proofreader
    Posted March 1, 2016 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    I think Guillaume Faye wrote somewhere: “Marinetti for some, Evola for others. Archeofuturism.” Or to use the formula of Arthur Moeller van den Bruck: “We must have the strength to live in antitheses.”

  10. Bogotan
    Posted April 16, 2016 at 7:15 pm | Permalink

    “Al despojarse de la túnica cristiana y de la toga clásica, no queda del europeo sino un bárbaro pálido.”

    “When he is stripped of the Christian tunic and the classical toga, there is nothing left of the European but a pale-skinned barbarian.”

    NGD didn’t considered him an european, neither biologically. neither considered to be white as a virtue or advantage, but to be civilized and beleive in God, in Christ.

    Not right, not left, Christ only.

    – bogotan reactionary.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted April 16, 2016 at 9:43 pm | Permalink

      Yes, which makes Davila of very limited interest to me.

      • Gustav Bjornstrand
        Posted April 17, 2016 at 9:09 am | Permalink

        This is a very interesting issue really. Since I got hold of a selection of the Escolios and have been reading them and gaining some background on NGD’s catholicism, a similar concern has come up for me. Yet the issue is more extensive than just this one man’s Christian preference: This is a European issue and it is one of tremendous dimension. The Europe that we all know and desire to protect, both spiritually and intellectually as well as somatically-biologically, is a unique creation and a blend of trends that arise in Rome, Judea, Greece and Alexandria (symbol and fact of the Meditteranean idea-blending pot). The ‘Germanic world’, ‘Germania’, has so many tangible and ineradicable links to the Mediterranean world that, at least from my perspective, I do not see how they could ever be disentangled. Yet it does appear to be true – or is it mere idealism? – that the Germanic world represents a unique and focussed relationship to the so-called ‘chaos of peoples’ of the early Christian era (and hence Christianity itself a melding-together of confused, disparate ideas and motives). In my own reading I find that Houston Chamberlain has such a unique and rather bold relationship with the figure of Christ but he also interprets Jesus as a Gentile and locates the primary opposition to Judaic materialism in his rebellion. In his self-sacrifice.

        I see what I would call a ‘neoplatonic manouevre’ in relation to Christianity as the only way to salvage the figure of Christ. The Forth Gospel for example is a metaphysic established on a Hermetic base and is in that sense non-Judaic. It describes a metaphysical relationship to and about ‘Logos’ which simply does not have to be, and is likely not, a Jewish concern at all. An intelligent logos must be seen as prior to all things and the Forth Gospel, if one deciphers its hermeticism and privelages it, allows for the inclusion of this metaphysic in a more strict Germanic ideology. And really this seems to have been what happened with, for example, Heidegger: turning away from the controlled Catholic form and back to idea-logos.

        As reactionary I would say that NGD is relevant and representative of an intellectual rigour which is highly emulatable. And that his method and intensity (his reaction) is important as a step toward further radical definitions. But his old-school Catholicism, though logical in a Latin American context, is still problematic and hard to sort through.

        • Gustav Bjornstrand
          Posted April 17, 2016 at 9:12 am | Permalink

          Fourth …

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    Here’s the Thing

    Trevor Lynch: Part Four of the Trilogy

    Graduate School with Heidegger

    It’s Okay to Be White


    The Enemy of Europe

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace