Print this post Print this post

Arlington Road

888 words

Arlington Road is a terrific film. From the gripping opening scenes, it is a psychological and political thriller that is suspenseful, stylishly directed, and superbly acted. But the amazing plot twist at the end raises it to something much higher.

I am sad that I did not hear about this movie when it was released.  But it turns out that Arlington Road was shelved by the studios for a year before release, and it was not effectively promoted. I can see why: From the point of view of Hollywood’s overall propaganda line, it goes “off message” in a major way.

Director Mark Pellington is apparently a white man who is primarily known for his music videos.

Jeff Bridges plays Michael Faraday, a widowed professor of American History at George Washington University in Washington, D.C. He lives in a McMansion subdivision in Northern Virginia, where he is raising his nine year old son Grant.

Faraday’s research focuses on domestic terrorism, with a special focus on patriotic militia groups. His interest can justly be deemed an obsession, and he has a very personal motive. His wife, an FBI agent, was killed three years before in a botched FBI raid/standoff that is an amalgam of the Ruby Ridge and Waco incidents.

It is remarkable that this incident is presented as a mistake by the government. The target of the raid was a law-abiding firearms collector who had just applied for a dealer’s license (shades of Waco), but the FBI charged in, killing the target’s wife and young son (shades of Ruby Ridge). This is the first way in which the film goes “off message.” (You’ll have to see the movie to learn about the other ways.)

Faraday is portrayed as a neglectful father and a bad neighbor. He does not even know the Lang family across the street until he finds their son Brady covered with blood after an accident. Faraday rushes Brady to the hospital (he recovers) and as a result becomes friends with Oliver and Cheryl Lang (Tim Robbins and Joan Cusak).

The friendship seems off to a good start. Grant and Brady become playmates when Brady is released from the hospital.

But Faraday begins to suspect that Oliver Lang is not who he claims to be. He begins to investigate Lang and discovers that he is really named William Fennimore and that he was imprisoned when he was 16 for sending a pipe bomb to the Bureau of Land Management. (The bomb never went off.) His motive was resentment against the federal agency that destroyed his family’s livelihood and drove his father to suicide.

Fennimore/Lang finds out that Faraday is on to him, and there is an emotional confrontation in which he explains himself, seemingly resolving the issue between them. Faraday even turns to the Langs for solace when his girlfriend Booke is killed in a car accident.

The misgivings, however, begin to mount again. Faraday begins to suspect that Fenimore is behind an Oklahoma City-style bombing of a Federal building in Saint Louis, a bombing that had been blamed on a single suicide bomber.

Lang, however, is one step ahead. He kidnaps Grant, holds him hostage, and tells Faraday that all he has to do to get his son back is be a good neighbor for a couple of days. Lang is clearly planning another bombing. Faraday, of course, tries to stop the bombing and rescue his son. But actions often have unintended consequences . . .

I highly recommend this film. It is suspenseful and well-made, but beyond that it provides much food for thought.

To my mind, the biggest question is the identity and motives of the bombers. They are portrayed as ordinary suburban white people who have beefs with the federal government. They are not portrayed as racists or White Nationalists, but they are all white, and the whites in the movie have a definitely “majority American” look, with names like Fennimore and Faraday. The only black character is an FBI agent, the former partner of Faraday’s wife.

Perhaps the best reason to think they are not White Nationalists is that they are part of a large, well-funded, well-organized network that is adept at strategic chess games and psychological profiling. Harold Covington could have come up with a plot like this, but nobody in the WN world could ever bring it off.

Of course the people who made this movie might not know that. Arlington Road might be merely the projections of paranoid left-wingers who have made us out to be something we are not.

But another interpretation suggests itself: Lang and company work for the government. They are the ultimate “controlled opposition”: terrorists spawned by the system in order to justify the creation of an ever-tightening surveillance state.

The Langs have Federal law enforcement written all over them. They are a nice, white family that moves around the country frequently, going from one safe, manicured subdivision to another. Dad is a bit vague about what he does for a living. Mom stays at home with the three kids. They seem to have plenty of money for a comfortable upper middle-class lifestyle. And when one job is completed, the “for sale” signs go up, and they await word on where they are being transferred next. Cheryl says “I hope it is someplace safe.” Oliver answers “Always.”

This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , . Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  1. Posted October 24, 2010 at 3:08 pm | Permalink

    I was alerted to this movie last year through an Amazon review by The Northern Light, a Scandinavian gentleman of pro-White sentiments. His book and film reviews, all from a consciously pro-White perspective, are a valuable resource.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted October 24, 2010 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

      Great tip. It is spooky, but it looks like this guy has read his way through my library. But he has seen far more B-movies than I could ever stomach. Yes, a valuable resource indeed.

      • Posted October 25, 2010 at 5:11 am | Permalink

        Yes, I was going to point out that convergence; Hamsun, for instance, for I guess obvious reasons. Also, he has an interesting technique of posting the same review for every version of the same book; not sure if there’s an easy way to do that on Amazon, but an excellent way to make sure your views are made known!

  2. Erik Nordman
    Posted October 24, 2010 at 5:59 pm | Permalink

    I cheated and went to Wiki to read the plot. I seemed so good, I still want to watch it. The part about someone being framed for the St. Louis bombing has a certain Mc Veigh flavor to it, as do other things I won’t reveal.

  3. Posted October 25, 2010 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    Kudos for bringing to light an unjustifiably forgotten film. While there is certainly nothing in the film to contradict your idea that the Langs may actually be government agents, there’s also nothing to directly support it – and I would imagine that the makers of this film, like everyone in Hollywood, are all in favor of the government just so long as the Democrats are in charge. When it first came out I saw it as part of the “domestic Right-wing terrorist” scare that prevailed in the popular imagination during the period between the Oklahoma City bombing and September 11, when it was displaced by the fear of Islamic terrorists. So, for me, your idea of it being a paranoid Leftist fantasy is more probable, although that in no way invalidates your own interpretation.

    While this is a worthwhile film, I definitely agree with your view that the “underground Right” portrayed in it is just as unrealistic as all other cinematic attempts to portray it. Hollywood always depicts the “radical Right” in one of two ways: as a movement comprised entirely of uneducated, redneck, socially inept, violent Nazi fetishists with no real power (as in “American History X,” “Blood in the Face” and “The California Reich”); or as a vast underground network with access to huge financial backing and covert support from within the political mainstream which is poised to take over the U.S. (as in “The Boys from Brazil,” “The Believer” or “Betrayed”). There is some truth to the former, although it’s certainly not the whole story, and if it were really as powerful as the latter films make it seem then the Right wouldn’t have been so ineffectual in recent decades.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    Here’s the Thing

    Trevor Lynch: Part Four of the Trilogy

    Graduate School with Heidegger

    It’s Okay to Be White


    The Enemy of Europe

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace