Sex & the Silence
The Never-Ending Cover-Up of Britain’s Imported Rape-Epidemic

3,797 words

I have just viewed footage of what may be the most inept kidnap attempt I have ever seen. In CCTV from October 2024, a 25-year-old black man approaches a 19-year-old white female student sitting quietly on the steps of a railway station in north-west England and attempts to drag her away with him…but he didn’t have any waiting transport to steal her off in. Apparently, the man was so stupid he expected to be able to shove her over his shoulder like a cartoon caveman picking up a new wife, and then lug her on the train back to his lair without being either noticed or apprehended doing so. As it was, an elderly white couple intervened, the girl fled, and the incompetent woman-thief entered the station, only to be quickly arrested. On Friday 13 June, unluckily for him, the fool was sentenced to 27 months behind bars.

We are always being told in these days of uncontrolled non-white immigration into the West that African, Arab, and other nations are sending us their “brightest and best”, thereby to profoundly enrich our entire societies. Cases like the above would seem to imply that, contrariwise, these places aren’t even sending us their brightest and best rapists. [1] Come on, Somalia! Surely you can do better than this?

The Lemon of Lime Street

The abortive kidnapping interested me for a number of reasons. Firstly, the transport hub it took place outside was Lime Street Station in Liverpool, the city where I once attended university, long, long ago, during a happy, prelapsarian time when broad daylight public kidnap attempts from strange black men were entirely unknown amongst the student body; but no longer, evidently. I am guessing the kidnapper may have been a foreign immigrant, legal or otherwise, as his name was Osman Moalem, which hardly sounds like a typical native moniker. Being a port city, Liverpool does have a long-term black population, customarily concentrated in inner-city areas like Toxteth (home of some of England’s earliest and most innovative race-riots during the 1980s), but the traditional Liverpool blacks tended to have more English-sounding, less Muslim-y, names.

It is difficult to have this guess definitively confirmed or denied, though, because media reports of Moalem’s trial provide not the slightest detail about his nationality, religion, or current immigration status. Instead, they tend to describe him in vague terms only either as “a random man”, or “a remorseless creep”. A remorseless British creep? A remorseless Sudanese creep? A remorseless Wakandan creep? Who knows?

Compare this to another recent incident in Liverpool when, during the soccer team Liverpool FC’s Premier League victory parade through city streets this May, a maniac drove his car into the watching crowd, causing horrific injuries. Within hours, police were eager to tell us the suspect arrested was “a 53-year-old white British man from the Liverpool area”, not, say, a 27-year-old brown Muslim man from the Damascus area, as many may otherwise have wholly unwarrantedly concluded.

The reason was obvious. Merseyside Police, who cover the general region within which Liverpool is located, gained much flak for failing to release any real details about Axel Rudakubana, the 17-year-old black knifeman of Rwandan background arrested for stabbing three little girls to death in the nearby town of Southport last year. Such complete lack of information allowed the false rumor to quickly spread that the killer was a newly-arrived illegal Muslim boat-person, a theory which helped cause widespread anti-immigrant race-riots across England and Wales last summer.

Merseyside Police’s actions following this May’s Liverpool FC victory parade attack therefore seemed to set a precedent: after every potentially riot-triggering, racially sensitive-seeming crime that was ever committed, ethnic details about the suspect would henceforth have to be publicized in a timely manner, to avoid people jumping to the wrong conclusions. But it would be no good just saying when a white native was responsible. If a non-white foreigner was to blame, to be logically consistent, the authorities would have to tell the public about that too…wouldn’t they?

Pubic Disorder Causes Public Disorder

You would think that, following another emotive example of an assault upon a helpless local young white girl being brought to its courtroom conclusion with the Lime Street kidnap case on 13 June, police and media would have felt obliged to tell us all about Osman Moalem’s nationality and immigration status, too. He may, like Axel Rudakubana, have been born here. But, likewise, he may not. Don’t the public have an automatic right to know now?

To instantly tell the whole world the Liverpool soccer victory parade attacker was white and English, but not to inform anyone about the Liverpool kidnapper’s own specific ethnic background, could be taken by some suspicious minds as implying a two-tier justice and public relations system of some kind to be at work here.

Data just released from the UK Ministry of Justice following Freedom of Information requests (i.e., not voluntarily) demonstrates that 26 percent of sex assault convictions against women in Britain last year were perpetrated by foreign nationals, despite such persons (officially) accounting for ‘only’ 11 percent of the general UK population. A further 8 percent of offenders were listed as being of “unknown nationality”, so must presumably have also been foreign themselves too, surely? If so, then that would mean 34 percent of UK sex offenses were committed by foreigners, just over one in three, a massively disproportionate number. In such an environment, many ordinary citizens are obviously going to look at the Osman Moalem case and conclude, rightly or wrongly, he may perhaps have been amongst their number. Why, that’s the kind of information-vacuum that can lead to a riot!

Or possibly even a criminal conviction of your very own, merely for speculating about such forbidden possibilities. Lucy Connolly is a white English child-minder currently serving time in prison for tweeting the following message on 29 July last year following the Southport stabbings, a message so incredibly powerful, it supposedly caused all the subsequent riots in the first place:

Mass deportation now. Set fire to all the fucking hotels full of the bastards for all I care. While you’re at it, take the treacherous government and politicians with them. I feel physically sick knowing what these families [i.e., of the murdered little girls] will now have to endure. If that makes me racist, so be it.

Under Section 19(1) of the Public Order Act 1986, this purportedly counts as stirring up racial hatred and violence, as opposed to simply being an ordinary culturally dispossessed Englishwoman ranting and venting her spleen in momentary anger. Under the terms of the 1986 Act, Connolly’s prosecution had to be specifically approved by the present left-wing Labour Party Government’s chosen Attorney General, Lord Hermer, thus making this whole thing seem like an ideologically motivated prosecution for an act of Public Racial Wrongthink, and Connolly a sort of political prisoner.

For this heinous tweet – which she didn’t even mean literally, just as an expression of despair and fury – Connolly received a 31-month sentence. Compare this to Osman Moalem, who received only a 27-month sentence. For trying to physically kidnap someone. So, it is now sometimes considered to be a worse thing, in the eyes of the British legal system, to object in writing to non-white, non-British, males committing acts of abuse and violence against white British females, than it is for non-white males to actually commit such offenses against them.

We are constantly assured by our benign authorities that the very idea of there being any kind of two-tier justice system in the UK today is nothing but a false, far-Right myth. It seems to me more likely that the idea there isn’t one is nothing but a false, far-Left myth in and of itself. [2]

Mutiny On the Buses

Another thing that interested me about the Liverpool Lime Street incident was the detail Osman Moalem lived in Halton – my own hometown, which, as readers of my previous columns on Counter-Currents may recall, was once so white that the first black man I ever saw near my house as a child was mistaken by me for an actual extraterrestrial being. Things are certainly demographically different there now, as the presence of Moalem as a resident would tend to prove.

The Borough of Halton is split into two main separate towns, Widnes and Runcorn. Moalem lived in Widnes, in the rough area where, as I recently wrote, my elderly auntie was not long ago approached by a random black immigrant at a bus-stop who asked if he could come and live in her house as the local council had failed to provide him with adequate housing. Using public transport in the Merseyside region now appears a dangerous thing indeed for lone unaccompanied women to attempt, whether in their teens or their eighties.

Voters being heartily sick of being unable to so much as catch the H25 bus without being forcibly abducted away to join the Caliphate, when a parliamentary by-election was held in Runcorn on 1 May this year, the usual pro-immigration Labour Party candidate was chucked out in favor of a new MP from the anti-immigration Reform UK Party, a former local magistrate named Sarah Pochin. [3] Unlike Lord Hermer, Pochin certainly believes there is “100 percent” a two-tier justice system in the country, one which has been getting “worse and worse” over the past twenty years, so much so that it caused her to quit her role in disgust. Following her electoral victory, she asked a TV interviewer:

How can you be [in] a job like a judge, or a presiding justice, as I was, and be told [by superiors] that you can’t send certain ethnic minorities to prison, that you have to go soft on certain areas? You can’t do that job and have those parameters [placed] on you.

You can in today’s supposedly non-existent two-tier Britain. During her campaigning in Halton, Pochin claims to have seen clear CCTV proof of illegal immigrants, housed at taxpayer expense in so-called ‘Houses of Multiple Occupancy’ (HMOs – very unpopular locally), being allowed to commit crime involving drugs and machetes with apparent impunity:

According to Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, speechifying on the campaign trail prior to the by-election, there were then around 750 illegal immigrants dumped in Runcorn by the Government, under its so-called “dispersal policy” (a euphemism for “spreading the misery” – in itself a euphemism for “socialism”). At 70 such individuals per 100,000 residents, Halton currently has the third-highest number of asylum seekers, on a per capita basis, in the entire UK, despite the fact that, according to some metrics, Runcorn itself has the lowest average wages of any town in its parent county. Farage said residents had told him that the foreigners’ presence there had made them afraid to go out of an evening, and that unvetted boat-people had been following their kids to school.

After her victory, Pochin followed up on this theme in a TV interview:

People would come into the office telling me that they felt unsafe walking around the streets, felt that they couldn’t let their children out to play, particularly daughters, stories of illegal immigrants filming children, really horrific stuff. CCTV was shown to us of gangs at night in these Houses of Multiple Occupancy, private landlord accommodation that illegal immigrants are living in. Drug dealing clearly going on: very, very threatening behaviour in a street where you have normal, decent families, and they suddenly find themselves next door to a house like this … It is a dangerous issue, and I will stand up for these women that feel threatened.

Recent front-page images from Halton’s local newspaper (full stories here and here) about Space Invaders sexually assaulting Halton schoolgirls and schoolboys would tend to back this narrative up:

So, let’s assess the available evidence. The Lime Street kidnapper was young, black, and called Osman Moalem. He lived in Halton, a once 99.9 percent white place newly flooded with more asylum seekers, per capita, than almost anywhere else in the country – and in a specific area of Halton where black men are known to approach random women on public transport and seek to occupy their own houses. As a result of such vibrant newcomers, Halton is, according to Sarah Pochin and Nigel Farage, now a place with a growing problem around female sexual safety, due to these people’s frequently far different cultural norms. When he tried to kidnap the girl in Liverpool, Moalem himself appeared to make zero effort to conceal his activities, almost as if he didn’t even think he was doing anything wrong, something which may reasonably be taken to imply he was raised in some kind of alien culture where doing such things was considered perfectly acceptable.

Put all this together, and I think there’s a fair assumption – albeit no definite actual proof – that Mr Moalem may well not be a full-blooded, native-born Englishman. Maybe such assumptions are incorrect, and actually there were several hundred thousand black Muslim Moalems listed in the Domesday Book. But, if this is indeed so, should Merseyside Police and the media not be letting us all know, as they recently did with the white soccer parade attacker, just to avoid any more Southport-style riots breaking out?

A typical comment on the website of UK rolling news channel GB News demonstrating clearly how ordinary members of the British public automatically presumed Osman Moalem must have been one of the illegal immigrant “boaties” allowed to settle in the country by slimy “2TK Starmer” (i.e., ‘Two-Tier Keir’, a popular nickname for the current UK PM Sir Keir Starmer).

Civil Serpents

On Friday 13 June, Osman Moalem was handed down his sentence. By the start of the next working week, on Monday 16 June, a new report into the UK’s long-running Pakistani rape-gangs scandal was released, carried out by Baroness Louise Casey, which found, to absolutely nobody’s surprise, that, whilst there were child-grooming gangs of all races, religions and ethnicities in operation across Great Britain, a vastly disproportionate number involved Pakistani Muslims: in Rotherham, one of the epicenters of the scandal, 64 percent of suspects had Pakistani backgrounds, despite them making up just 4 percent of the population there.

As such impressive data tends to support the positive leftist-pushed stereotype of immigrants being abnormally hard workers, at least when they enjoy the particular line of work they’re given to pursue, you’d think the powers-that-be would be eager to publicize it: but no. Instead, in the majority of cases, police and social workers simply preferred not to record the ethnicity of perpetrators at all, under the pretense it was wholly irrelevant. Suspiciously, despite (i.e., because of) the increasing saliency of the issue in the white public mind, the number of criminals committing child-sex offenses in the UK who are sentenced without having their ethnicities recorded by police is actually increasing at the moment, from 18 percent in 2017 to 32 percent in 2024, a near doubling. Why might that be?

Perhaps because disguising such data allows the UK Home Office to issue reports like one from 2020 which laughably concluded there “was not a disproportionate overrepresentation of British Pakistanis” amongst the country’s impressively well-organized child-rape cults. In her report Baroness Casey said it was “hard to understand” how the Home Office had reached that conclusion. No it isn’t. The Home Office is full of liars and traitors who would literally prefer to see white children get gang-raped, tortured and murdered than admit the awkward truth that their beloved nostrums of multiculturalism and mass immigration are an all-time civilizational disaster. The post-Tony Blair British State is worse than the rapists themselves are, because they’re the ones who are ultimately facilitating all this to occur.

In one instance, Baroness Casey found a child-rape case-file report where the very word “Pakistani” had been blocked out throughout with Tipp-Ex (what Americans call white-out) by a social worker. “I thought, ‘Oh God, the person that did this is well-meaning but utterly stupid’,” Baroness Casey told The Times. [4] I don’t think he or she was well-meaning, I think he or she was a criminal. It now emerges that former Conservative Party MP Michael Gove, who was Education Secretary at the time some of the earliest news about Muslim rape-gangs first emerged in 2011, was allegedly subjected to pressure from his own civil servants to go to court to prevent such ethnically embarrassing revelations ever being made public. Creditably, Gove stood his ground and refused; but why aren’t those civil servants who tried to shut him up being named, sacked, humiliated and imprisoned? Because they didn’t post any naughty tweets like Lucy Connolly?

One of the worst revelations of Baroness Casey’s report was that, although she could not reveal precise details for fear of prejudicing future trials, rape-gangs were still operating across the UK – and that “a significant proportion” involved not simply non-white men who were born in Britain, or who had already received full citizenship status, but who were currently in the ongoing process of seeking asylum there. According to reports, once news of this fact got out, the British Government thought such info “could spark civil unrest” – a euphemism for more white riots, like those in Northern Ireland a week or two back after some Romanian gypsies tried to rape a schoolgirl yet again.

Did you know that there have actually been more convictions of white people for rioting during one single day last summer in Rotherham than there have been convictions of non-white people for raping children for 25 solid years in that same small English town? No? That’s because you’re not supposed to. All the UK authorities care about now is trying to obfuscate and keep a lid on things, not trying to actually solve the problem. The latest instance has just emerged from the city of Portsmouth. Here, an asylum seeker housed in a hotel had reportedly attacked a young woman, before council officials contacted the only local politician with enough conscience to try and blow the whistle to voters to warn him to “shut his mouth” about the whole thing.

Subhuman Rights

In 2016, Police Scotland discovered a Glasgow rape-gang with around 50 members, every last one of whom was an asylum seeker from Muslim lands like Pakistan, Iraq, Turkey, Morocco, Egypt and Afghanistan. Police Scotland’s response was to keep it all secret; it took a newspaper investigation to publicly uncover the rape-gang’s very existence. In 2020, after being exposed, a Police Scotland spokescunt claimed that “We always carefully consider what information to release to protect vulnerable victims.” More like “to protect vulnerable foreign rapists.” In 2018, another asylum seeker rape-gang was exposed in the city of Newcastle, where one asylum-seeking rapist was asked what he liked best about the UK. His reply was, at least, very honest: “You can get anything here – any sex, drugs, alcohol. There is no control.” No, there certainly is “no control” here any more, Abdul – by unspoken design of the British State.

Just look at the countless valuable foreign pedophiles Britain cannot currently deport, due to its membership of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), the supposed global ‘gold standard’ in terms of legal wisdom. Marlon Martins Dos Santos is wanted in Brazil for repeatedly raping a five-year-old girl, but Brazil’s perfectly reasonable extradition request has been refused under Article 3 of the ECHR’s Human Rights Convention, which protects criminals like Marlon from suffering “torture and inhuman treatment”, even when they thoroughly deserve it. Now safe in Britain, he spends his days accumulating many and varied new convictions to add to his collection, including being found guilty of possessing over 1,000 child abuse images deemed to be of the most serious category, back in April. He also has a prior conviction for murder.

Jamil Ahmed, meanwhile, is that very rarest of things, a Pakistani pedophile. In 2008 and 2013, he was convicted in Scotland after abusing teenage girls. Earlier this year Jamil successfully delayed being catapulted forcibly back home, on the grounds that, as his crimes had been reported on in Pakistani newspapers too, he might end up being attacked by “religious fanatics” over there. If by “religious fanatics” here Ahmed just means “Muslims”, there’s plenty of those in Scotland nowadays too, so we might as well just send him back him anyway.

Baroness Casey’s report into all this is sold as being ‘hard-hitting’, but in actuality she doesn’t go anywhere far enough. Her suggestions for reform are all perfectly sensible and welcome in themselves – mandating the recording of ethnicity of offenders, an overhaul of rape laws, etc – but nowhere include real and lasting long-term solutions, such as mass deportations, or future ‘No More Backwards Pakistani Hill-Folk Clan-People, Please’ race-based immigration policies. Nowhere does Casey say Islam is ultimately incompatible on any large scale with life in the West, even though it is. Instead, she just frets about what will happen if the “far right” or “racists” get hold of the issue of Muslim rape-gangs and exploit it to do what is clearly necessary.

Meanwhile, we are told by Labour’s Lord Hermer in a recent speech that anyone who wants to withdraw from the ECHR and deport pedos is somehow a Nazi. In advocating for the sovereign right of sovereign nations to control their own borders and legal systems, Hermer squeals, critics of the ECHR are simply imitating the Nazi-era jurist Carl Schmitt, who apparently advocated similar things. Do these sound like the words and actions of a British State with any genuine intention of solving the gigantic problem they themselves have created, or just of sweeping it all under the magic carpet yet again?

If we’re going to start throwing ‘Nazi’ accusations around so carelessly, Lord Hermer, when are you and your kind finally going to face the latter-day Nuremberg you so richly deserve?

Notes

[1] To avoid any unwanted legal complications here, I should point out very clearly that, to judge by media reports, the criminal concerned was neither accused of, nor convicted of, any actual sexual offenses in court, purely the specific crime of Attempted Kidnap. Precisely what this young black man wanted to do to this young blonde white girl once he got her back home is completely unknown. Many prejudiced and ill-informed outside observers may automatically assume he would be likely to have tried to rape or molest her, but for all we know he may simply have wished to force her to re-wallpaper his living room, unblock his sink, read him bedtime stories, convert her to following the Holy Word of the Prophet, or help maintain his burgeoning and increasingly unwieldy stamp-collection. Or, possibly, he wanted to cook and eat her. We just have no idea!

[2] If you want to see a pathetic legalistic “justification” for Connolly’s sentence, try looking here.

[3] In her former role as a regional mayor, Pochin has in the past put out social media posts (since deleted) welcoming Syrian and other refugees to the country, but now claims to have changed her mind.

[4] The Times (London), 17 June 2025, p.8