1,020 words
We have no idea what the final outcome of the US midterm elections will be, with several crucial races having yet to be called, and nobody is promising anything until next week — and even then, the Chairman of Arizona’s Maricopa County Board of Supervisors is saying, “Don’t hold me to it.” (That’s code for “Ignore this shady stuff and please don’t do another January 6, okay?”)
In the meantime, let’s take a look at four of the most interesting Republican candidates and one who flopped.
Joe Kent, Washington state’s Third Congressional District (not yet called)
Joe Kent is a military veteran who lost his wife in Syria, but for some reason still supports Israel. Despite this, he promotes a non-interventionist foreign policy. He was banned from YouTube for reasons that are unclear, but this should be seen as a positive thing by new Republicans.
He’s an immigration patriot who promised to do his part to build the wall in order to protect American jobs. Things got weird last summer when he learned that Nick Fuentes had endorsed him and couldn’t get rid of it fast enough. Kent disavowed Fuentes and advocated for “inclusive populism.” As a result, America First commentator Vincent James responded by asserting that Joe Kent works for the CIA. Whether this is true or not, his success means that Republican voters are responding to national populism, and this is a good start.
J. D. Vance, US Senator, Ohio (won)
Vance self-identifies as a “conservative outsider” who saw the writing on the wall and did an about-face from being a “Never Trumper” to firmly opposing immigration. On his campaign’s website he writes that “American decline was a choice . . . They chose to flood our country with criminals and drugs” as a result of immigration.
In October, Ohio was in the national news because a 10-year-old rape victim in the state needed to travel to Indiana to get an abortion. Vance’s opponent, Tim Ryan, brought this up in a debate to shame Vance — but this was an egregious mistake, as it turned out that the rapist was an illegal alien. Vance ripped into Tim Ryan: “You voted so many times against border wall funding, so many times for amnesty, Tim. If you had done your job, she would have never been raped in the first place.”
Blake Masters, US Senator, Arizona (not yet called)
Democrat incumbent Mark Kelly had a good run, no doubt in part due to his having been an astronaut. Blake Masters nevertheless outperformed him despite a funding disadvantage (Kelly had $75.5 million compared to Masters’ $9.9 million in the third quarter) by presenting a platform the new Republicans want. Masters names both Black Lives Matter (BLM) and antifa, and he gained points with all those who have noticed America’s racial decline by bravely stating the obvious: Gun violence is a problem with “black people, frankly.”
Kari Lake, Governor, Arizona (not yet called)
Like Masters, Kari Lake is committed to supporting law enforcement, although she doesn’t directly name the BLM and antifa offenders. Her primary campaign focus was instead on election integrity. Maricopa County, Arizona’s largest, gained notoriety in 2021 after an audit revealed that 74,243 more mail-in ballots were included in the final tally during the 2020 Presidential Election than were mailed out. This made things awkward for the county, which today, three days after the election, still has about half a million votes to count.
Lake still expects to win, however. Senior campaign advisor Caroline Wren has provided a walk-through of what to expect here.
Mehmet Oz, US Senator, Pennsylvania (lost)
You can buy Greg Johnson’s Toward a New Nationalism here
Let’s face it: Everybody reading this was googling, “What kind of name is Mehmet”? Dr. Oz is a Turkish Muslim immigrant. He most likely genuinely believes in his stance against immigration, but it perhaps wasn’t the wisest strategy for him to argue for a “barrier” to keep immigrants out, which sound a lot less convincing than “Build the wall.” Moreover, he completely caved in to BLM. When asked if he agreed with BLM, he said, “BLM didn’t do justice to the real struggle we have.” This wasn’t much better than what his primary Democratic opponent, Kathy Bernette, had said when she declared her desire to erect a statue of Barack Obama next to Abraham Lincoln on Capitol Hill.
Oz’s strange kowtowing to Israel is another weak point. Americans are tired of losing family members to “bring democracy to the Middle East.” Nevertheless, Oz has an entire section on Israel on his website’s Issues page, where he claims, “Now more than ever, our dear ally needs partners in the Senate.” Israel currently receives a minimum of $3.8 billion annually from the United States.
Some pundits are bewildered by Oz’s loss to Democrat John Fetterman, who had suffered a stroke and therefore had a hard time even completing sentences during his campaign. It’s not an unfair question to ask if Fetterman is even medically fit to serve. Nevertheless, Fetterman is likeable, while Oz is bland.
Republicans lost a seat here, but the good news is that we have six more years of Fetterman memes.
Conclusion
Donald Trump’s first campaign was so enticing to voters because he talked about the fact that the Republican Party needs to change if it is to survive. This led to the rise of new Republicans, who depart from what the party stood for prior to Trump’s rise. So what sets these new Republican candidates apart from the old Republicans?
- They put “America First,” both in language and protectionist policies;
- They all promise to do their part to “Build the wall” to protect American jobs; and
- They promote law-and-order policies as a response to the 2020 BLM riots and their aftermath.
The Great Replacement activates swing voters. A recent University of Massachusetts Amherst poll found that 60% of Republicans believe America is losing its culture and identity due to immigration, and that 37% of Americans overall, regardless of party affiliation, believe this to be the case.
In order to deliver victories to their constituents, Republicans will need to put America First. A winning candidate will oppose immigration, assert the American identity, defend law and order against BLM and antifa, and end foreign wars.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “Paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
- Third, Paywall members have the ability to edit their comments.
- Fourth, Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
- Fifth, Paywall members will have access to the Counter-Currents Telegram group.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
9 comments
America First is a winner. That means – trade protectionism, zero immigration, no tolerance for crime and urban terrorism, no more phony “refugees,” a complete end to Affirmative Action, and no more wars of choice. If the GOP had made a Contract with America to include the above, then they would have won in a big red wave. But that would annoy their donors. They’d rather lose than that.
There are some exceptions, however, as noted in this article. It’s great that JD Vance won. I hope the other three win. The Media fear Kari Lake, in particular.
As for Mehmet Oz, I’m glad he lost. He’s another Mitt Romney. He’s best friends with Oprah Winfrey, another anti-White billionaire. And the Democrat, John Fetterman, is the perfect spokesman for the “woke” agenda. He looks like an Antifa freak. He will help to discredit the anti-White ideology of our ruling class.
Love America First, cannot agree with the idea that more candidates embracing it would have created a Red Wave. The GOP lost due to 1) a reaction against anti-abortionism and the Dobbs ruling, and, especially, the unimaginable post-Dobbs stupidity of the annoying pro-life movement’s immediately pushing unpopular maximalist abortion-restrictionist legislation in many states, as well as the prolife-addled GOP nominating many prolife maximalist candidates {ie, candidates like the idiot Mastriano in PA, who wanted to ban all abortions even in cases of rape and danger to mothers’ health and lives, and who dragged down Oz as well}; and 2) the disgusting antics of the endlessly petulant and GOP-destructive Trump.
The one bright note, as everyone says (except, curiously, Ms. Quinn above), was the crushing reelection of DeSantis, who just might secretly be one of us, and who has vowed that “FL will be where woke goes to die”. C’mon, man, that’s pretty promising in these terrible times! DeSantis, not the erratic miscegenationist Vance, is our future (along with maybe Tom Cotton, the only major elected politician I can think of who in recent years has opined publicly about reducing legal immigration – the real cause of America’s transmogrification and concurrent decline).
‘America First’ is a very ambiguous brand because what is meant by ‘America’ is no longer stable or obvious.
Their love for their imperiled heritage
The Enemy announced was “hate”, and in his rage
Demanded all must hate their hate and all
Must hate without exception any soul
Unwise enough to show them sympathy
Or face the trials of his antipathy,
From social exile to the heavy threat
Of laws he promised soon to legislate
Against the merest overheard expression
In defiance of his anti-white suppression.
‘Inclusive populism’ means ‘Whites to the back of the bus’.
It’s never going to happen. Most Repubs are Great Replacement globalists. Some of those are simply doing what their paymasters want, but others of them really do hate us Dirt People. Those who aren’t GR globalists are too cowardly to stand up for white interests. They’d rather see the nation that our ancestors built be destroyed than be called RACIST! Those who don’t fit into one of those categories are too few to matter. The Republican Party is probably the greatest hindrance to white interests in the country.
Then what do you suggest we do?
Is this still a white nationalist website?
The article is descriptive of select goings-on that suggest our ideas are making inroads with some people, in the present system as it is; It clearly doesn’t imply that any named figure’s policy exemplifies WN goals. It’s an observation piece (with some silver-linings).
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.