Print this post Print this post

Might is Right:
Damned by Amazon Since March 2020

2,213 words

On March 12th, 2020, swept all editions of Might is Right into the digital dustbin and suppressed the sale of the 123-year-old book. They did not merely stop selling the book, they completely removed any trace that they ever sold them in the first place. While the 19th-century text had stirred up controversy over those years, the publishers of the most scholarly edition have never heard of it being banned before now.

Published in 1896, Might is Right is a work of bombastic poetry, scathing blasphemy, universal skepticism and is a deceptively literate tirade. Sometimes crude and often embellished with swaths of stolen phrases and facts, it is yet a bracing and inspiring paean to individual excellence, freedom, and power that has found eyes and ears among anarchists and artists, communists and cranks, poets and Pulitzer Prize winners.

Might is Right registered a note of blistering dissent during the rise of the Progressive Era: skeptical of democracy, egalitarianism, the “dignity of labor,” suffrage and other causes of the day. With a background in Georgism and the labor movement, Arthur Desmond, writing under the name “Ragnar Redbeard,” seems to have crafted the book to serve as an expression of a profound transvaluation of his own values, championing the mighty individual over any and all human identities: religious, political, racial or otherwise. No longer was the abstraction of the “working man” a thing to be defended for the betterment of humanity, but an obstacle like all others that beset the path of the conquering unique man.

One man, many voices.

My freedom becomes complete only when it is my — might; but by this I cease to be a merely free man, and become an own man. . . You long for freedom? You fools! If you took might, freedom would come of itself. See, he who has might “stands above the law.”

— Max Stirner, The Ego and His Own

Until the 1930s it was public knowledge that Arthur Desmond wrote as Ragnar Redbeard. The two names were bylined one after the other in newspapers reprinting his bombastic poetry, or they were referenced in recollections of revolutionary adventure penned by his comrades. Somehow that knowledge would be lost for a half-century, and would remain doggedly obscure for decades more, notwithstanding the best intentions of the few stalwart researchers who discovered the link. Not only was it known that Desmond wrote as Redbeard, but that he also wrote, lived or conducted business under a variety of curious aliases: Douglas K. Handyside, Adolph Mueller, Sirfessor Superight, Richard Thurland, Number 7, Keo Kaha, Gavin Gowrie, and others. It is, however, not true to say that Redbeard was Desmond.

It is no more true that what was written as Redbeard necessarily reflected Desmond’s views any more than any author writing any work of poetry or prose.

The book & the author in context.

“It is the making Claim by Right to that which they are incapable of securing by Might: the attempt to carry through the exchange by shouting and pious incantation which makes the democratic advocacy offensive. The democrats are sweedlers: from no point of view to be recognised as on a level of estimable equality with highway robbers who are gentlemen by comparison.

— Dora Marsden, The Egoist

Might is Right is a book written by an obscure figure from radical Antipodean and Chicagoan history. While most contemporary references treat the author as an isolated, decontextualized figure, who wrote a “proto-fascist” book, Desmond’s formative intellectual and cultural milieu was the anarcho-communist labor movement of New Zealand and Australia, though he would later cavort among the bohemian literati and syndicalist toughs of Chicago and the scattered Egoist philosophers of Europe and America.

After his book was published, it would elicit rebuff from the former Progressive Mayor of Chicago John Peter Altgelt and Russian Christian Anarchist Leo Tolstoy, among others. It would be championed by the Industrial Workers of the World, the legendary bohemian theater and hobo university The Dil Pickle Club, and the first wave of Nietzscheans in the Anglosphere.

The author Ragnar Redbeard is regularly likened to is Friedrich Nietzsche (who was alive when early editions of Might is Right were in circulation), but his style and substance is actually far closer to that of the more obscure German philosopher, Max Stirner, who was the first to explicitly champion the phrase “might is right” as an expression of an egoist worldview. Redbeard would also play a major role in getting Stirner’s great work Der Einzige und sein Eigentum published in the English language for the first time in 1907.

As a man in Australia, Arthur Desmond was a street-fighting anarchist poet who fought for unemployed gum workers and Māori land-rights.

As a man in Chicago, he co-owned a candy-shop. He worked as a bookseller and publisher of radical literature, and he authored two books.

The only known crimes he was involved in were: plagiarism, defacing a bank, and fighting the police. As a man of history, he has been stripped of all that is interesting and complex and contradictory; the human author of Might is Right has, to borrow a fashionable term, been canceled in favor of a conveniently fabricated bogeyman — one that is conspicuously more reflective of 21st-century fears and obsessions than of the marginal 19th-century efflorescence that he inhabited and helped to create.  And it is this crassly emotive incarnation — this bogeyman — that now complicates the possibility of honest remembrance.  A writer and thinker whose identity was for a time forgotten is now further reduced to some sort of quasi-Nazi racial supremacist, a vaguely imagined enemy whose book of Darwinian individual supremacy is now somehow purported to buttress a worldview that stripped the individual of his sovereignty in order to uphold a totalitarian dictatorial state and the phantasm of collectivist identity.

Satire or sincerity?

The intent of sincere humanitarians is to do good to society, just as the intent of the child who kills a bird by too much fondling is to do good to the bird.

— Vilfredo Pareto

One of the debates surrounding Might is Right concerns whether it is a work of satire. Some seem to find, after discovering the radical-left background of the real author, that the book must be a work of Swiftian satire: taking the Social Darwinism of Spencer to the furthest extreme as a kind of reductio ad absurdum. This view is often proposed by those who seem to allow for an extreme expression of satire to exist where the same expression sincerely proffered should be suppressed.

This is a disgusting hypocrisy.

There are some who believe only an elect intellectual class should have access to such incendiary works.

This is an even grosser hypocrisy.

Both expressions are, more and more frequently, not the product of the conservative religious prudery, but a manifestation of the frothing censorial demands of people who call themselves liberals. Calls for the suppression of books are now less voluble from within the ranks of moral majoritarians, while being ever more stridently pitched, often and ironically under the cloak of “justice,” by non-profit organizations with the word “Education” in their names.

While it is certainly possible to interpret Redbeard’s “later work” as “satire,” one could just as easily advance the same implication instead with reference to his earlier work. At what point did Desmond decide one thing over the other? What ideas are those of Desmond, and what are those of “Redbeard” that are not Desmond’s?

These are sensible questions to ask once one has resolved that anyone should be able to freely make intellectual inquiries about any topic, and that books should not be suppressed.

“Content Guidelines”

During our review process, we found that the subject matter of your book is in violation of our content guidelines. As a result, we cannot offer this book for sale.

— Email from Amazon

A charge so vague that it could imply anything, and never clarified, is “violation of our content guidelines.” It is a claim that some unspecified something in a book goes against what Amazon will allow on their site. As has been stated many times, there is no way that such a policy can be consistently applied across their platform when an endless number of high-profile books of potentially questionable merit — and with far “worse” content — remain for sale.

Ultimately these are moral judgements, as there is nothing illegal about the content of Might is Right (even if one could claim there was plagiarism, all of the source material is NOW public domain).

Redbeard uses violent language. He is misogynistic, and uses blunt, racist terms. He mocks religious groups and their gods without mercy. There is nothing sacred to Redbeard but the self and the “manly virtue” of victory.

Suppression of all of this makes sense only if you believe that: a) people cannot think for themselves, and that words are magical devices that control the person reading them, or b) you cannot allow people to think for themselves, because you will lose control over them.

We do not protest Amazon expressing their might, as they are right to do: we just call them cowardly dogs for being so mealy-mouthed in justifying their nakedly censorious agenda. Their vague and selective invocation of “content guidelines” is a transparent ruse, a pusillanimous appeal to a fictional collective good that undermines the core value and utility of free inquiry.

Two-year-old Hitler.

I write because I wish to make for ideas, which are my ideas, a place in the world. If I could foresee that these ideas must take from you peace of mind and repose, if in these ideas that I sow I should see the germs of bloody wars and even the cause of the ruins of many generations, I would nevertheless continue to spread them. It is neither for the love of you nor even for the love of truth that I express what I think. No—I sing! I sing because I am a singer. If I use you in this way, it is because I have need of your ears!

— Max Stirner, The Ego and His Own

Might is Right was written a mere thirty years after the American Civil War ended, and just two decades before the First World War began. Suppressing it on the supposition that it is somehow responsible for the offenses of National Socialists a half-century later (who certainly had never heard of the book), or those would-be National Socialists 120 years later who selectively edit Redbeard’s text to remove parts they don’t like, is nothing short of absurd.

Even if, in Linz, Austria, a two-year-old Adolf Hitler read Otto Amon’s German translation of Redbeard’s poem “The Logic of Today” from a Frankfurt newspaper, this unlikely event would still have no delineable connection to the policies, practices or ideals of National Socialist Germany. One might just as easily — and just as fallaciously — speculate over the influence of Redbeard’s prose in shaping the policies New Deal America or Revolutionary Spain.

And even if, by some impossible feat of revelation, it could be shown that Baby Hitler did indeed read and absorb the translated words of a deceased Australian archist, this would still not be sufficient reason to intentionally suppress those words. Baby Hitler could have been wrong, after all. The interpretive question is rightly one that free people — not Amazon censors — should be at liberty to consider, or even to ignore.

It’s just downright selfishness.

The law of God is most powerful and most just, which is this: “Let the stronger always be superior to the weaker.”

— Epictetus, The Discourses

From Protagoras to Epictetus to Machiavelli, and then from Sade to Stirner to Redbeard, we may trace a philosophical thread, articulated in different ways, and expressed in different styles and severities. The simplest name for it is Egoism, and it sings a song of the self-sovereign. To some it means that one must not accept mastery, nor exert it on others. To others, it means merely that one must be master of himself and all creation that he can possess.

Might is Right, in demanding that the mighty “question all things” opens itself up to interrogation. Indeed, in this sense, it is far braver than those who now seek to suppress it, for it invites scrutiny. This invitation is anathema to censors of all eras.

The text that Ragnar Redbeard crafted over a century ago thus continues to agitate those with power because it lifts the veil of their piety to reveal their own selfish impulses. Might is Right revels in the fluid essence of such selfish impulses that empowered censors demurely euphemize, sanctify and deny. It proudly wags a jester’s cock when the emperor and his entourage pretend his new clothes are beautiful, modest and regal.

We do not expect to convince censorious prigs to no longer be such; we can only wave my own proud cock at them for as long as I am master of myself to do so.

— Kevin I. Slaughter
Publisher, Underworld Amusements
March 24th, 2020


This article was originally published by Kevin Slaughter at Damned by Amazon.

Find out more about the book and the author at:

Find out more about egoism at:

Read more about Amazon book banning:

You can buy copies of the banned book at:



  1. Amwolf
    Posted March 26, 2020 at 9:44 am | Permalink

    I’m not surprised nor should anyone here be. I urge all readers to boycott Amazon and all of their affiliates. I ceased doing business with them and closed my account in the fall of 2017. Support niche market publishing houses that value free speech and don’t contribute a portion of book sales to Neo-Marxist organizations or charities. You know how and where to find them.

  2. HamburgerToday
    Posted March 26, 2020 at 10:18 am | Permalink

    Our enemies do what they do because they can. Amazon is following Ragnar’s advise and allowing might to make right. What is there to complain about? Unless, of course, when it come right down to it, Ragnar and everyone else who espouses their creed assume it is their might that will always prevail. It’s of some curiosity the author cites Epictetus on ‘might makes right’ without highlighting the fact that Epictetus’ people were the losers in the exercise of ‘might’ (Epictetus himself was a former slave).

    Amazon did nothing wrong.

    You either want liberalism or you want Egoism.

    You cannot have both.

  3. Franz
    Posted March 26, 2020 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    When Anton Szandor LeVay (ne Tony Levy) was approached by Bantam Books after he got famous briefly for forming the Church of Satan, he hastily agreed to providing them a “book of Satanic thoughts.”

    Unfortunately Tony Levy didn’t have too much in the way 0f thoughts, Satanic or otherwise. He did a lot of fast cribbing. His “book” came along slowly and unevenly, plagiarism notwithstanding.

    Years later his daughter Zeena told everyone where: Tony snagged a copy of Might is Right and melded it with choice bits from Ayn Rand’s “Virtue of Selfishness.” Zeena, bad girl that she was, even hinted that Levy himself was not involved; some hack editor was paid scale to cob something, anything, together since the deadline had passed.

    Joke’s on Amazon anyway: Get cheap used copy of Anton Sandor LeVay’s Satanic writings and Ragnar is all there.

  4. Alexandra O
    Posted March 26, 2020 at 3:08 pm | Permalink

    I’m of the opinion that every book on Europe or Europeans or those of us of European extraction will eventually be banned or at least removed from libraries and book stores. Any book that speaks glowingly, or merely truthfully, of European history, culture, art, music, literature — or European accomplishments, inventions and innovations — will simply be removed from shelves, and/or manuscripts turned away by publishers. This thought first entered my head when I first heard of “The White Nationalist Manifesto” being banned, and I also noticed this phenomenon perhaps after the election of Trump, or the Charlottesville fiasco. At any rate, it’s moving at full gallop now.

    So, I began buying old books, mostly written before 1965, which seems to be the ‘ground zero’ date of the ‘Beginning of all Our Troubles’. I don’t collect rare books, just former texts, and also commentaries on history and historical personages, as well as village diaries and glowing remembrances of how Europe used to be, often beautifully illustrated with old photos or old hand-painted sketches. Take heart, there are myriads of such books in the U.S., and England, in charity shops (Oxfam is a treasure-trove), thrift shops, garage sales, and my favorites — library sales. Every time I enter my small local library, I always find something amazing on their sales shelf — best find was ‘The Bell Curve’ for 50 cents). Also, marvelous coffee-table books, lavishly illustrated, which once sold for $50, now $5. Same with art books. I now have about 1200 so far, and I named my collection “The Fortress Library”, for these books protect our truth as well as our memories and inspirations.

    If everyone reading this site would buy a few books a month, eventually we’d save several hundreds of thousands over our collective lifetimes to share with ‘the future’. Is this perhaps worthwhile, or are we just saving scraps from a trash heap of history? Maybe I’m just a wishful hoarder, but when Amazon raises its black hand against me and says, “You can’t have this!”, I stand and answer — “Oh, yes I can!”

    BTW, I do have a copy of “Might is Right”.


  5. Sympathetic Sophist
    Posted March 26, 2020 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Respectfully, I think you’re missing something important here. The text is not a creed unto itself, but one part of a dynamically-articulated creed, one that is generated through the interpretative energies of the people who allow it and other similar bodies of thought inside themselves (emphasis mine):

    “While it is certainly possible to interpret Redbeard’s “later work” as “satire,” one could just as easily advance the same implication instead with reference to his earlier work. At what point did Desmond decide one thing over the other? What ideas [elements of creed] are those of Desmond, and what are those of “Redbeard” that are not Desmond’s?

    These are sensible questions to ask once one has resolved that anyone should be able to freely make intellectual inquiries about any topic, and that books should not be suppressed.”

    …furthermore, you suggest the writing opposes Amazon’s actions on their own, and yet:

    “We do not protest Amazon expressing their might, as they are right to do: we just call them cowardly dogs for being so mealy-mouthed in justifying their nakedly censorious agenda. Their vague and selective invocation of “content guidelines” is a transparent ruse, a pusillanimous appeal to a fictional collective good that undermines the core value and utility of free inquiry.”

    In the same way that Redbeard’s work waves the jester’s cock at all power-cloaked-in-piety, this article waves the cock at Amazon’s power-cloaked-in-content-guidelines.

  6. cecil1
    Posted March 26, 2020 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    I’ve noticed some pro-White Websites being censored from uploading on

    I get the message:

    ‘This URL has been excluded from the Wayback Machine.’

    Has Counter Currents been censored from the website?

    If so, this is something it would be good for more people to be aware of.

    This seems to be happening even on ostensibly open net for everyone sites

    • Scott Weisswald
      Posted March 27, 2020 at 4:46 am | Permalink

      I’ve not noticed this, but I tend to use for these purposes anyways.

  7. Smart guy
    Posted March 26, 2020 at 6:01 pm | Permalink

    Alexandra O: if we organize ourselves in such a way that we have real world communities we can build libraries for ourselves where we can compile thousands of such books. We should have libraries in all of our communities where we can share books with real, true information – which we will not get from our corrupted public or university libraries.

    The question is how do we organize ourselves in such a way that we can start to bring money together so that we can build things like community centers with libraries where our young people can come and borrow books with no fear of books being blacklisted.

    I wrote an article on Ricardo Duchesne’s Eurocanadian blog where I propose that we unite ourselves around the veneer of an ethno-religious movement.

    That way we would not be openly “white nationalist” – we would be just another ethno-religious movement like jews and sikhs but with our own libraries and institutions.

  8. Petronius
    Posted March 27, 2020 at 6:18 am | Permalink

    Well, I’d say the very banning of this book and others implies that “Might is Right” is a rather insufficient philosophy. You can call Amazon being cowardly because they won’t admit their political bias or agenda as much as you want, they’ll still do what they want because they can, and they could even argue that their hypocrisy is a very useful tool to foster their power and “might”.

    Why does the banning and censoring of books outrage us, apart from the harm it does to small publishers? Because we have a belief that truth matters, in free inquiry, in doubting, debating and measuring, in freedom of thought… all things that would not necessarily bother a radically egotist philosopher.

  9. Posted March 27, 2020 at 6:47 am | Permalink

    A work of stunning banality. Holding this up as any kind of philosophical background for the Right is appalling. Nihilism and misanthropy … haven’t we got enough of that in society already?

  10. Amwolf
    Posted March 27, 2020 at 11:24 am | Permalink

    K R Bolton: While on the subject of Nihilism, I recommend reading Nihilism: The Root of the Revolution of the Modern Age by Eugene (Fr. Seraphim) Rose.

  11. Strock
    Posted March 27, 2020 at 6:11 pm | Permalink

    I share the opinion of K R Bolton.

    Moreover, if the enemy was smart, they’d be mighty glad that this kind of book is being promoted among and associated with the dissident right. It’s only the sheer pettiness of some of their actors that prevents this.

  12. meh
    Posted April 8, 2020 at 1:04 am | Permalink

    Might makes right. Might also makes wrong. Might makes all things.

  13. Richard Hatch
    Posted May 28, 2020 at 1:16 pm | Permalink

    They also banned “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” “On the Jews and Their Lies” by Martin Luther, and “The International Jew” by Henry Ford around the same time.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    Here’s the Thing

    Trevor Lynch: Part Four of the Trilogy

    Graduate School with Heidegger

    It’s Okay to Be White


    The Enemy of Europe

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace