Print this post Print this post

Can Finland Prevail?

2,364 words

Edward Dutton
The Silent Rape Epidemic: How the Finns Were Groomed to Love Their Abusers
Thomas Edward Press, 2019

Evolutionary psychology researcher and anthropologist Edward Dutton, most recently the author of At Our Wits’ End: Why We’re Becoming Less Intelligent and What It Means for the Future, has just come out with another very interesting text. In The Silent Rape Epidemic, Dutton deals with his adopted nation of Finland, arguing that the evolutionary history of the Finns has made them uniquely vulnerable to multiculturalist ideology and its consequences, but also uniquely capable of reversing current trends.

Much of the material in this text overlaps with the material in Dutton’s earlier work, such as How to Judge People By What They Look Like, At Our Wits’ End with Michael Woodley of Menie, and The Genius Famine with Bruce G. Charlton. Many readers will thus be able to skip much of the material on intelligence and personality. There is, however, a significant amount of interesting material specific to Finland and the Finns, who stand out in numerous ways.

Compared to other Western European nations, Finland has kept a low profile historically. Although readers may be familiar with successful Finnish heavy metal bands such as HIM and Apocalyptica, the nation has produced relatively few prominent individuals, artistic or otherwise. The nation has even been mocked in a song by the British comedy group Monty Python for being especially boring, with its main attractions including “eating breakfast or dinner, or snack lunch in the hall.” Dutton goes into several reasons why this is the case and explains how the related character traits have made them especially vulnerable to exploitation by unscrupulous newcomers.

First of all, Finland is a cold country, even in comparison to neighboring Sweden and Norway. Although like much of Europe, it is significantly warmed by the Gulf Stream, it is located at a far northern latitude, similar to northern Canada and Iceland, and as such is dominated by long winters. Dutton argues that such conditions “lead to small gene pools, because you must be strongly adapted to them or perish” (24), meaning that Finns have more in common with each other genetically than many other nations, with fewer exceptional individuals. Such a group of people will also have the personality traits which enable them to be highly cooperative, again because this was necessary historically for survival. These include having relatively low testosterone and self-esteem, making them shy and averse to conflict.

Finnish heavy metal musician Eicca Toppinnen demonstrates a typical unsmiling Finnish face.

People with exceptionally high IQs and a moderately antisocial personality are in many cases responsible for questioning established norms, but Finland has proportionately fewer of these geniuses than other white nations. Not only do Finns have a lower degree of the necessary character traits, such as individualism, but their intelligence profile differs from that of other Europeans. Dutton cites evidence that the Finns are the most intelligent European ethnicity, with estimates of between 102.2 and 111 for their average IQ, even the lowest of which would put them above the rest of Europe. However, this does not translate into many geniuses. As a very genetically homogenous population, intelligence is distributed along a narrower bell curve for the Finns than for other nations, meaning that they have fewer mentally retarded people as well as fewer of the intellectually gifted.

Due to these factors, only five “Finns” have ever won a Nobel Prize, two of whom were from a Swedish-speaking minority ethnicity known as the Finland Swedes. Indeed, practically all historically significant individuals born in Finland have been Finland Swedes. This ethnic group is genetically distinct from Finns, and are generally described as differing in personality as well. The author has contributed to research which shows them to be less neurotic and more extroverted and conscientious, which may account for their disproportionate success in Finnish society. Comprising only five percent of the population, the Finland Swedes make up “24% of board members of the 50 largest Finnish companies” (63).

All of these factors lead to a population which is highly trusting and averse to conflict. Unfortunately, this has enabled people from very different cultures to abuse their trust. Although historically Finland has had very little crime, in recent years there have been many cases of Finnish girls being raped, often where the girls are under the age of 16. Practically all of the perpetrators have been Muslims of Middle Eastern origin, with those of Iraqi and Afghan origin in particular being forty times likelier than Finns to be perpetrators of sex crimes in 2017. This represents an abuse of trust in two ways. Not only have some Finnish women and girls had the false impression that it is safe to be alone with these men, but the nation’s political leadership had a similar misplaced trust in them, welcoming large numbers of them as refugees. In 2015, Finnish Prime Minister Juha Sipilä even encouraged people to take these Muslim men into their own homes.

Sex offense rates per ten thousand people by nationality. Source: Statistics Finland, police. Ruotsi means Sweden, Venäjä is Russia, and Viro is Estonia, while Suomi is Finland.

Although there are high rates of rape in neighboring Sweden, mainly also perpetrated by Muslim men, only in Finland and the United Kingdom has there been evidence of gangs organizing sexual attacks. Individual victims have been raped by numerous perpetrators working in concert, including cases of gang rape in public parks. Dutton counts twenty-nine cases of underage girls being sexually abused over the span of a few months in the northern town of Oulu. In one case, a girl under the age of 15 was allegedly raped repeatedly by seven men over a period of several months. All of these men had been admitted as “asylum seekers or quota refugees.”

Dutton presents evidence that this type of atrocity is actually an evolved behavior, as it is in the genetic interests of the rapists. As low-status men, refugees in Finland are unlikely to be attractive to many Western women, so their chances of passing on their genes through legitimate means are low. “[B]eing a low status single male is a key predictor of being a rapist,” and both rape in general and of virgins in particular, which most underage girls surely are, mean a higher likelihood of pregnancy (108). Of course, many pregnant rape victims in modern-day Finland would not pass on the attackers’ genes, as they would get abortions, but the way in which the instincts of the attackers have evolved cannot take this into account. Further, rape has evolved partly as a weapon of war, as it demoralizes the victims’ side, putting them at a disadvantage in the conflict and thus making them less likely to survive to pass on their own genes.

Dutton argues that the Finns’ trusting nature has also led historically to putting misplaced trust in their leaders. Today, this tendency, combined with a strong evolved desire to fit in, means a willingness to follow the Finnish elite in embracing the new norm of multiculturalism, despite historically being a very ethnocentric group and being aware of the problems Muslim immigration has caused in neighboring Sweden. This also helps to explain attempts by the authorities to cover up the nature of the atrocities for over a decade, beginning in 2005, as they were apparently desperate not to cast doubt on their newly-fashionable immigration and asylum policies by revealing their consequences.

While there were also attempts by British law enforcement authorities to cover up the Muslim grooming gang scandal in that nation, UK newspapers reported on the issue as soon as they were informed about them. In Finland, by contrast, newspapers helped to confuse the issue, reporting on it only with broad terms such as “foreigners” to obscure the fact that the perpetrators were Middle Eastern Muslims, who in many cases had been admitted as refugees.

Of course, not all Finns support the multiculturalist agenda, and there is some representation of their views in government. Two of the largest parties have campaigned on a promise to limit immigration, but both have been unreliable in keeping Finland Finnish.

In 2015, Juha Sipilä, the Finnish Prime Minister and a member of the Center Party, reneged on his own promise to limit immigration and decided to welcome large numbers of “refugees.” Timo Soini, then Chairman of the populist Finns Party, had the opportunity to break up the governing coalition in protest, but refused to do so for reasons that remain unclear. Angry voters replaced him with the hardliner Jussi Halla-Aho, but the party was subsequently expelled from the governing coalition, which narrowly avoided collapse.

Former figure skater Kiira Korpi, a rare smiling Finn.

Dutton covers several other Finnish idiosyncracies, including the fact that they rarely smile. He describes them as “taciturn, introvert[ed], joyless, reserved, and perfectly happy to be solitary,” in contrast to the more outgoing Swedes (65). Not only do Finns have a narrow IQ range, they also have a narrow range of personality traits, with few Finns being much more extraverted than the norm, for example. In connection with their evolved low testosterone and aversion to conflict, they display social anxiety or introversion, which can be seen in an interview with two of the nation’s most successful musicians, Paavo Lötjönen and Perttu Kivilaakso. Lötjönen confirms that Finnish people “are not really spontaneous . . . they are really calm . . . the Finnish audience is pretty boring . . . German people are more spontaneous compared with Finnish people.”

This book was written without the benefit of a co-author, and this shows in the writing. It is at times less well-organized than the previous volume, At Our Wits’ End, which was written with Michael Woodley of Menie, and it is sometimes rushed or cramped. An earlier co-author, Bruce G. Charlton, also seems to have made Dutton’s thinking more accessible in the 2016 book, The Genius Famine.

Finland today is notable for being one of the most highly developed nations in the world, including being rated first in the World Economic Forum’s 2015 Human Capital Index, as well as being highly rated in the UN Human Development Index. But historically, it was one of the poorest European nations; in 1915 it was the “poorest country in Europe,”[1] and did not industrialize until the 1950s. Dutton argues that this late development means that in comparison to other European nations, the Finns have not been exposed for as long a period to certain deleterious modern trends.

First, as was covered in much greater detail in At Our Wits’ End, while in earlier centuries the more intelligent tended to have more children, so that each generation inherited genes for greater intelligence than the previous one, the opposite has been the case since some point after the Industrial Revolution. Numerous factors have combined so that the least intelligent people now have the most children, leading society’s average IQ to decline. As recently as the 1970s, Finland had not shown this trend in fertility, which partly accounts for their persistent high IQ.

Second, Finns have not experienced a loss of religiosity to the same degree as many Western nations. In stark contrast to nations such as The Netherlands, where over two-thirds of the population is religiously unaffiliated, in Finland only twenty-six percent are, and practically all believers are members of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland. Not only does this contribute to a stronger group identity, but religious people tend to possess certain personality traits: studies show higher levels of “Conscientiousness (rule-following) and Agreeableness (altruism and empathy)” (13). This means that a more religious society is often a more trusting and trustworthy one, and indeed, Finland has been repeatedly ranked one of the four least corrupt countries in the world.

Third, Dutton makes a similar argument regarding ethnocentrism. He argues that their brutal treatment of their enemies, such as the Russians in the first half of the twentieth century, in contrast to their generosity towards their own people, indicates high ethnocentrism among the Finns. There is also more recent evidence of this: about twenty percent of respondents in a 1998 poll “favored the view that people from different cultures should not mix,”[2] while in 2000, forty-two percent did not feel that certain races were suitable to live in Finland.[3] Both lower religiosity and lower ethnocentrism, Dutton argues, are connected to certain genetic mutations which have become more common since industrialization, and so have not taken hold to the same degree in Finland as in many other European nations.

The author argues that not only their traditional ethnocentrism, but also the Finns’ conscientious and agreeable personalities, will actually be a great advantage in reversing the current situation. The Finnish desire to follow rules and please others has meant that they were easily led to support multiculturalism, but it would also make them easily led in the opposite direction once there is a change in who they feel obligated to please. Dutton cites a study arguing that once twenty-five percent of a population “adhere[s] to a counter-cultural viewpoint, such as ethnocentrism currently is,” they will be able to make their view the majority view (114). Once this process takes hold, Finns will be particularly quick to adhere to the new norms, and particularly conscientious in following them.

Another point suggests hope for all Western nations, although Dutton presents it only in terms of what it means for Finns. Current immigration policies are already beginning to create a more stressful environment for much of the population, due to issues such as greater socioeconomic inequality and loss of social trust. Stress is correlated with religiosity, and people who are more religious tend to be more ethnocentric. Stress also tends to make people “more prone to our cognitive biases,” including ethnocentrism, which is a bias practically all people display to some degree (115). Thus, as the demographic situation worsens, we should expect more people to feel a preference for their own ethnic group, and thus be willing to defend the interests of their own group against those of others. Hopefully, this shift will happen sooner rather than later.


[1] A. Shaw, “Finland: The Russian Program and the Working of Woman Suffrage,” in American Review of Reviews, Vol. 51 (1951).

[2] Pertti Anttonen, Tradition through Modernity: Postmodernism and the Nation State in Folklore Scholarship (Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, 2005).

[3] Ibid.


  1. Posted March 14, 2019 at 6:12 pm | Permalink

    VG review of Dutton’s book, providing interesting insight into the Finnish people.

  2. Rhodok
    Posted March 15, 2019 at 5:50 am | Permalink

    Very interesting. Thanks for the review.

    So… Fins have high intelligence, a strong sense of ethnocentricity, and low testosterone.

    Which other groep (ethnicity) do we know that have a similar high intelligence, have a strong in-group preference, and use female tactics?… Right.

    Do we have a pattern?

  3. Philip Smeeton
    Posted March 15, 2019 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    The Left imagine that we are going to just lie down and let ourselves be mind-fucked without reacting.
    The Muslims believe that we will allow our girls to be raped and our land stolen without reacting.
    I for one am extremely angry.

  4. Make
    Posted March 15, 2019 at 11:49 am | Permalink

    Interesting article, but being one myself, I don’t completely recognize the picture Dutton is painting about Finns.

    I most certainly wouldn’t call the country especially religious. Sure, most people are still members of the official Lutheran church, but a lot of them simply out of habit. Very few people actually regularly attend church, most people only go to church on Christmas or when someone gets married, baptized or buried. The official church has also been steadily getting pozzed during the last couple of decades. Totally coincidentally they started accepting women as priests a couple of decades ago. I’m sure those two thing are not connected in any way, shape or form. The church is not as far gone as in Sweden, where the church has become a complete joke, but it’s definitely heading the same way.

    I’m sure Finns are still more ethnocentric than other Western European peoples, but I’m not sure how much that has to do with our DNA, and how much with the fact that the cultural-marxist brainwashing started here later than in those other countries. The cultural change (for the better) that is being discussed at the end of the article, however, has already began. There are going to be parliamentary elections in next month, and the nationalist Finns party has been quickly rising in the polls, and the grooming gang scandal that broke late in last year has definitely been one reason for this. It’s not an openly ethno-nationalist party, but its immigration stance is very solid. They want complete stop both to so called “humanitarian” immigration and to importation of cheap labour. The party chairman has also already suggested that we should start sending the “humanitarian” immigrants already here back home.

    So Finland might be one of the Western countries where the tide can be turned back by democratic means. It better, because while Finns on average have a very long temper, once they finally snap things get really ugly really fast. The article mentioned that Finns treated Russians brutally during the war. I would rather call it cold blooded efficiency, and I would guess that’s what’s in store for the child raping Mussulmans unless the situation is solved peacefully before that. The hot headed Arabs won’t understand this until it’s too late.

    • Howe Abbott-Hiss
      Posted March 15, 2019 at 2:17 pm | Permalink

      Thanks for the comment! He does actually talk about the decline of the church in the book. Apparently membership has dropped from 90% in 1980 to 69% this year, and in 2010 36,000 people left the church in two weeks in protest over the interior minister saying that homosexuality is a sin.

      He mentions religion losing influence in the schools as well:

      “Since about 2016, Oulu schools have been increasingly abolishing the tradition of pikkukirkko, where teachers take their classes to church, as well as the tradition of asking priests to come and speak at their schools. In some cases, ‘woke’ teachers have demanded, for example, that the priest come and speak at the school but not say anything about God or even that there should be a pikkukirkko but could the priest please avoid any mention of religion.”

      • Make
        Posted March 16, 2019 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

        The interior minister in question, Päivi Räsänen, is a member of a tiny Christian Democratic party. Unlike in Germany, the word Christian in the name actually means, that it’s a party for devout Christians. Some of the party’s supporters are indeed rather conservative, but some are more of the kumbaya variety. Räsänen has a tendency to give controversial statements about homosexuality, abortion etc., and all the far left nutjobs and shitlib hipsters love to hate her.

        The Christian Democratic party doesn’t have any kind of official ties to the church, and the more progressive higher-ups in the church might actually be a bit embarrassed by it. But when Räsänen said that homosexuality is a sin, all the bien pensants directed their rage towards the church, even though it didn’t have anything to do with the whole business.

        The whole thing was pretty hilarious, and it’s a good example how the church is sort of caught between two fires.

        On the one hand the church is trying to virtue signal by blathering about human rights and how great the rapefugees are. The nuttiest priests are even hiding rejected asylum seekers from the police so they wouldn’t be deported. This obviously pisses off plenty of conservatively minded people. On the other hand the church hasn’t yet gone full cult-marx with lesbian bishops and so on, so the loony left can still project their hatred of anything traditional to it.

        The question about whether to accept gay marriage or not is especially divisive inside the church. Back in 2014 10,000 people left the church after the archbishop gave a statement that supported gay marriage.

        So the church is trying to balance between upholding traditional values and going full SJW, and as a result it’s not pleasing anyone.

        • Make
          Posted March 16, 2019 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

          I might add this as sort of conclusion.

          Even though most people in Finland aren’t very religious, the church is still an important symbol of traditional values, and that’s why it ends up regularly being a battleground in the culture war.

  5. GMT
    Posted March 17, 2019 at 12:59 am | Permalink

    “Such a group of people will also have the personality traits which enable them to be highly cooperative, again because this was necessary historically for survival. These include having relatively low testosterone and self-esteem, making them shy and averse to conflict.”

    Does he give actual data that indicates that Finns have low testosterone? I am tired of the assumption in some parts of the alt right that Northern Europeans have lower testosterone than other Europeans, which has (from what I have seen) no scientific basis. The following study, which uses digit ratio as a proxy for masculinization (a metric which I admit has flaws) provides evidence that Finns have more testosterone on average than any of the other populations he sampled.

    “Dutton cites evidence that the Finns are the most intelligent European ethnicity, with estimates of between 102.2 and 111 for their average IQ, even the lowest of which would put them above the rest of Europe.”

    The IQ studies I have seen on Finland put them close to the European mean. However, if they were “between 102.2 and 111,” this would not necessarily put them above all other European nations. The IQ data that Richard Lynn’s collected on IQ test scores in various European countries put Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden around 104-107. He downplayed this data because it did not support his argument that East Asians have higher average IQ’s than Europeans.

    • Howe Abbott-Hiss
      Posted March 17, 2019 at 10:05 am | Permalink

      He does not have a direct measurement of Finnish testosterone, no. He does note that the Finns have a high level of schizophrenia, which is associated with low testosterone. 1.5% of Finns have been diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder, whereas “The percentage of the population with schizophrenia in the UK, Greece or Iceland is approximately 0.5% while in Sweden it is about 1%.”

      Also left-handed people have higher testosterone, and the Finns have a low rate of left-handedness (4% compared to 12% in the UK).

      I will send him this study on digit ratio though.

      >The IQ studies I have seen on Finland put them close to the European mean. However, if they were “between 102.2 and 111,” this would not necessarily put them above all other European nations. The IQ data that Richard Lynn’s collected on IQ test scores in various European countries put Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden around 104-107. He downplayed this data because it did not support his argument that East Asians have higher average IQ’s than Europeans.

      Based on “the Finnish PISA scores for the year 2012 using only native students, both of whose parents had been born in Finland,” they had the highest scores in Europe. This was for the low IQ estimate, 102.2. They also had the fastest reaction times, which is where the 111 estimate comes from.

    • Howe Abbott-Hiss
      Posted March 17, 2019 at 10:48 am | Permalink

      This is his comment about testosterone and digit ratios:

      >That is one (weak) measure of testosterone. Another is hairiness of fingers. Blacks’ fingers are less hairy than whites’ fingers (Dutton et al., 2016, Population Differences in Androgen Levels). That doesn’t prove that blacks are lower in testosterone than whites. You have to take many different measures and look at their overall direction. Moreover, even if 2D4D was a brilliant measure of testosterone, with a sample of 41, I’d be concerned about flukes even if the differences were ‘statistically significant.’

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    Here’s the Thing

    Trevor Lynch: Part Four of the Trilogy

    Graduate School with Heidegger

    It’s Okay to Be White


    The Enemy of Europe

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace