Print this post Print this post

The Black Baseline

2,695 words

Coming soon to your home town . . .

Coming soon to your home town . . .

German translation here

Sub-Saharan Africans are the fastest-growing demographic on the planet. With a fertility rate over three times as high as European women (5.2 children per woman to 1.6) that shows few signs of decreasing, the population of sub-Saharan Africa is projected to more than double, rising from 1.1 billion to 2.4 billion by mid-century.

With so many Africans coming into the world, it is vital to understand them better, but already much of the material produced on Africa and Africans is tainted with Cultural Marxism, so, to get an accurate picture, it is vital to refer to sources that predate political correctness. Here is passage is from a book published in 1930:

They are men who are possessed by the delusion that they are leopards, and therefore must kill men, and when they are out to do this, they try to behave altogether like leopards. They go on all fours, fastening on their hands and feet real leopard’s claws or iron imitation of them, so as to leave behind them a spoor like that of a leopard; and when they catch a victim, they sever his carotid artery, as leopards do. The remarkable and uncanny fact is that most of them have become human leopards involuntary, having been made members of one of the bands without being aware of it. The band prepares in a human skull a potion made out of the blood of one of their victims, and some man on whom they have previously fixed, is secretly given some of it in one of his ordinary drinks. Then he is informed that he has drunk the potion, and therefore is from that time one of the band. Nor does any one of them resist. They are all alike, dominated by the belief that a magic potion has some magic power against which no one can successfully fight, and so they obey unresistingly. (p. 13)

Another passage from the same book:

It is absurd to talk of exploitation by the timber-merchants of the labourers who come down from the interior, if that means that wages are too low. The work that these primitive humans do often bears no relation to the wage which has to be handed out to them at the end of their contract period. During the first months of it many of them are almost wholly useless, because they have never held an axe in their hands and have first of all to learn how to use one. Nowhere in the world, probably, strange as the statement may seem, is the total cost of labour higher in proportion to the work done than in the primeval forest. (p. 45)


But we are not tried only by the entire absence of discipline in our savages; we suffer from their absolute inability to understand that anything can be valuable. The hospital being so near the forest it is really not at all hard for them to get firewood. But, as it is rather less trouble, they prefer to burn the beams and planks which I procure with so much trouble and such heavy expense . . .  (p. 50)

And one more:

What work is caused us by the dysentery patients who can no longer move about, and who dirty everything where they sit or lie! Many have to be fed by hand because they are too weak to carry a spoon to their mouths. And the care of them is all the more laborious because the natives will not stir a finger to help them; to such disgusting work there is no bringing them. We therefore often have to do it all ourselves, and if there ever is a black man who will help, he is loaded with presents and smothered with praise. (p. 73)

By now – assuming you have been successfully socialized into the modern multiculturalist West by being brainwashed with notions of “White guilt,” race as a “social construct,” and “White privilege” – you must be thinking that these passages could only have been written by an extreme psychotic racist, possibly a whip-wielding slaver or paternalistic colonial fascist with a waxed moustache and sadistic twitch.

You must also be thinking that a book with such toxic examples of “hate speech” should be instantly pulped for the greater good of humanity. But while you are rightfully disgusted, you may also be feeling a wonderful warm glow, stemming from the deep love and respect you have for Blacks and other non-Whites, even if you don’t actually live among them or associate with them much.

But there is a slight problem, because these words were not in fact written by an evil racist from central casting, but instead by one of the greatest philanthropists of the 20th century and a Nobel Prize winner to boot. These are – Shock! Horror! – the words of Albert Schweitzer, a man who combined a deep love of the African with a clear-headed view of what Africans were really like.

But don’t worry about that embarrassing little detail too much. Nowadays thanks to the hegemonic forces of Liberal egalitarian tyranny, text like this, which doesn’t quite fit into the great multicultural Gleichschaltung of the West, can easily be recategorized as “racism,” while Schweitzer, like any other White man born on the wrong side of the 1960s, can quickly be inducted into the evil pantheon of racists.

* * *

For those of you who haven’t been successfully socialized into the modern multiculturalist West, however, Schweitzer’s account, which comes from his book More From the Primeval Forest (1958 Fontana paperback edition) is an invaluable picture of what can be called the “Black Baseline,” the essential nature of Blacks before they were changed by contact with Whites.

It is very important to remember that the Black Baseline exists, because it has often been very well hidden by the distorting forces of White influence on Blacks. Historically, through slavery, Christianization, miscegenation, colonization, neo-colonialism, and the West’s cultural hegemony, we have often changed Blacks out of all recognition, or at least think we have, but the fact is that the Black Baseline remains firmly in place and continually and relentlessly exerts its own influence in countless ways.

Reading a book like Schweitzer’s is a good corrective and reminder of the foundations of sand on which we have built our version of the Black man.

The White Liberal attitude towards Blacks has two main aspects. First they think that Blacks are a blank slate, and merely need to catch up in socio-economic and educational terms, through “affirmative action,” etc., in order to become ebony versions of themselves.

Yes, there is some plausibility to these ideas. Under intense political, cultural, and economic pressure of the sort that the Black community in the USA faced before the 1960s, Black behavior did appear to change in a variety of ways. The problem today, however, is that most of this pressure has now been reinterpreted as “racist.”

The other aspect of the White Liberal attitude is a belief in Black empowerment. This is held to be an absolute moral good, and something to be desired even in the absence of actual Black improvement. It is naively hoped that such empowerment will inevitably lead Blacks in “the right direction” – i.e. to become Black versions of themselves.

These ideas are obviously absurd and contradictory. They can only be resolved in the Liberal mind by removing all agency from Blacks and by continuing to blame any flaw, failure, or Black misbehavior on “White racism.”

External Influence versus Internal Influence

It is essential to keep the Black Baseline in mind because Liberal notions of race are hegemonic and so create the conditions in which the Black Baseline will reassert itself. Once White power and influence are removed from Blacks, as in places like Haiti, Detroit, or South Africa, a process of reversion to the mean immediately starts and Blacks begin the long journey back to their original baseline.

Many aspects of Black behaviour – from the desolation of American inner cities, gangsta culture, the disintegration of the Black family (actually a White family model imposed on Blacks by Whites), etc. – can best be understood as this Black baseline reasserting itself. The more time it is given the more it will reassert itself.

But Black empowerment, wherever it happens, is always a good thing, because it instantly reveals how vastly mistaken Liberal notions of race, Blacks, and the workings of human nature are.

Schweitzer’s book recalls his years spent in Africa, mainly in the valley of the Ogooue River in the then colony of French Equatorial Africa, now known as Gabon. Interestingly this is now one of the better-of parts of Africa. This is due to a small population (1.5 million), large oil revenues, and continuing strong post-colonial French influence – partly the legacy of Schweitzer. But in his own day the country was regarded as more primitive than average.

These differences in African development between one part and another, before the coming of the White man, do not reveal an indigenous variety between Africans, although there is of course some of that. The most important factor in these differences was the degree to which African societies had been exposed to another external influence, namely that of Islam. Those part of Africa most impacted by Islam tended to have less primitive if not less brutal cultures.

You could say that some parts of Africa underwent two waves of significant external influence (or colonization), one by Islam and one by Europe.

Gabon, as a country South of the zone of Islamic influence, was only influenced by Europe, a process that continues today through the country’s economic, and cultural links with France.

But while the West continues to exert power and influence in some parts of Africa, this is (1) conditional on the West’s economic interests and (2) at odds with the West’s declared ideology of egalitarianism and cultural relativism. With its mantra of White guilt and Black empowerment, Western Liberalism constantly seeks to undermine its own dominance and influence over Africa.

The ways in which these various external (Europe, Islam) and internal (the Black Baseline) influences contend with each other can be seen in two of the biggest news stories in Africa at the moment – the abduction of hundreds of Nigerian schoolgirls by the Islamic militant group Boko Haram and the breakdown into tribal anarchy of the recently independent state of Southern Sudan.

Because Nigeria has experienced waves of Islamic and European influence, it could be said that there are actually two Black Baselines at work, namely (1) Nigerian society with an admixture of Islamic influence before White colonization, and (2) Nigerian society before the arrival of Islamic influence.

Under the ideological stimulus of Liberal egalitarianism, White influence has been retreating from Nigerian society and allowing it to revert back to what it was, except where economic factors create a countervailing effect in favour of Western culture. Although in many ways less potent than Western influence, Islamic influence is more assertive. It is also more ingrained in Nigerian society, having been in the country for hundreds of years, whereas European influence has very shallow roots.

In recent decades there has also been an important change in Western attitudes. After decolonization in the 1960s, the West continued to exert strong indirect influence over many African countries through economic, diplomatic, and moral power. This was motivated by the imperatives of the Cold War. But since the end of the Cold War over 20 years ago, the West’s ideological emphasis has switched from an implicitly White hegemonic neo-colonialist attitude to an egalitarian multiculturalism tailored to its domestic needs.

From the African viewpoint this manifests itself as a loss of White mojo. Regardless of how many aid or anti-poverty efforts – or even military interventions – there are, the West, with its new egalitarian, culturally relativistic ideology, just looks weak, and its influence continues to ebb. In this environment Africa returns to its baselines – Islamic or primordial.

In Nigeria, since independence in 1960, European influence has steadily declined, but the same cannot be said Islam. On the contrary, Islamic influence seems to be growing and organizing itself. Boko Haram defines itself as specifically anti-Western, the name translating as “Western Education Sin.” Obviously Islam does not suffer from the same process of ideological self-loathing as Western Liberalism.

But while Nigeria reverts back to its pre-British Islamic baseline, we have to remember that there are Islamic societies and Islamic societies, and that not all Islamic societies are alike. Beneath Nigeria’s Islamic baseline, the more primordial African baseline continues to exert its undying influence. Despite its overt Islamism, Boko Haram is actually a fair approximation of both processes, melding tribalistic, voodooistic, and Islamic elements together into a brutal cocktail. Like Schweitzer’s leopard men cult, this is a group that thrives on a male dynamic of group violence, although instead of the leopard as their avatar they have adopted the bloodthirsty prophet.

As I said before, though, Black empowerment is always a wonderful thing. One of the most interesting aspects of this case is the statement by Boko Haram that they intend to sell the girls in order to raise money. In other words, the hegemonic White man abolishes slavery, but the empowered Black man simply ignores this and brings it right back in again. Let the Liberals sit and ponder that one, before they find a way to blame it all on White racism again.

Double Decolonization

While Nigeria veers back to two atavistic baselines, the South Sudan shows what Nigeria might look like without the influence of Islam. Following independence from the Islamic North in 2011, South Sudan has quickly fallen apart and now is the scene of massacres, “tribocidal” warfare, and famine.

Both North Sudan and South Sudan are ethnically diverse, with various large tribal groups, but the North, thanks to an Islamic culture, has been able to maintain a crude political unity, and for a time was also able to impose this on the South. Since independence however the South has come apart at the seams in a dramatic case of reversion to the Black Baseline.

This is significant because other ethnically diverse non-Muslim countries have been able to maintain a modicum of political unity. Schweiter’s old haunt of Gabon is a good example, as this is just as ethnically diverse as South Sudan. The real difference between these two cases is the relative continuity and strength of European influence.

In the case of Gabon, France maintained strong links after independence and helped prevent fragmentation. In the case of South Sudan, following the departure of the British in 1956, there was a period of uneasy Islamic dominance. This effectively filtered out stabilizing post-colonial influence by Britain.

With weak European influence and weak Islamic influence, following the completion of what can be called it “double decolonization” in 2011, the country quickly went off the rails. Rather than becoming another relatively docile and malleable neo-colonial entity like Gabon, the country is now sliding into its own version of the Mfecane – the great inter-tribal bloodbath that cleared the way for the Boer colonization of South Africa.

One of the sad pleasures of Africa’s constant troubles is the delicacy with which the Western media reports them. Ludicrously respectful news organizations like the BBC insist on translating atavistic tribal bloodbaths into the nomenclature of serious political struggles, ensuring the mismatch between the “rational” and the real, and a constant supply of absurdities.

While talking about bodies rotting in the streets of the town of Bentiu for two weeks, the BBC talks about the “rebel forces” re-taking the town from “pro-government” troops, when these terms simply refer to the different Nuer and Dinka tribes, intent on massacring each other and raping each other’s woman.

Liberal egalitarianism means Black empowerment, and Black empowerment means reversion to the mean, to the Black baseline. In Nigeria this means Boko Haram showing their contempt for Western education by auctioning off schoolgirls on the slave block. Elsewhere it means something even worse. In Africa the West has created a vacuum and they call it progress. Those projections of 2.4 billion sub-Saharan Africans by mid-century may be a little optimistic.



  1. Lew
    Posted May 8, 2014 at 10:50 pm | Permalink

    Only blacks could apply Islam in ways that make the Taliban distance themselves.

  2. Posted May 9, 2014 at 12:53 am | Permalink

    superb essay, will tip. I myself was deceived by this “government troops” and “rebels” libstuff. Not any more.

  3. Tim
    Posted May 9, 2014 at 2:26 am | Permalink

    2.4 billion… That’s food for thought, or another kind of food. I for one, intend to avert my eyes from what’s to come. It’s a good thing that the powers that be don’t want us to see.

  4. Bruce
    Posted May 9, 2014 at 2:50 am | Permalink

    The scariest thing is the fact so few whites actually know that the Black baseline exists. The horror of post-Katrina New Orleans should’ve reminded everyone. But white people today are educated by the Media; they don’t listen to their racist grandparents who use the “N-word.”

    Give racism a chance, folks. It might just save your life someday.

    • WWWM
      Posted May 11, 2014 at 8:46 pm | Permalink

      If Hurricane Katrina did not wake white people up to what is going on, nothing will. Of course I am biased, but I don’t think most white people are so stupid as to be completely racially unaware. Most are just too afraid to say anything, except through some humor which is always the last refuge of truth.

  5. fnn
    Posted May 9, 2014 at 7:56 am | Permalink

    The EU plan seems to be to have Europe absorb the surplus African population. Of course that will mean the end of Europe, do they realize that?

    • Framklin Ryckaert
      Posted May 9, 2014 at 2:18 pm | Permalink

      Of course they realize that. The EU was especially created to organize White Genocide.
      Google : The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan, golden dawn international newsroom.

    • Armor
      Posted May 9, 2014 at 8:43 pm | Permalink

      “do they realize that?”

      The Jews know what they are doing. Our non-Jewish rulers simply go along with it and try not to think too much about it. Many of them think they are powerless to make any change and don’t want any problem with the Jews and their allies. Some of them are stupid, or too conformist, or don’t care, or are in denial. A minority of them are leftists who want to punish society. The leftists who support race-replacement usually do it as a political gesture, because it reinforces their status among their peers, not because they want to destroy their nation. Actually, most of the non-Jews don’t know what they are doing.

  6. Harry Savannah
    Posted May 9, 2014 at 9:20 am | Permalink

    Yes. An important and new revelation (at least to you as well as me). The matrix is a deep well and ascending to the surface seems never quite accpomplished. A generation-and-a-half of mesmerizing has been to very good effect.

    • Peter Quint
      Posted May 9, 2014 at 9:54 am | Permalink

      Actually it is over 2000 years of mesmerizing, it all began with christianity.

  7. Kilroy
    Posted May 9, 2014 at 10:31 am | Permalink

    The main reaction I have seen to the Boko Haram atrocities is to blame it on Islam and generic “Islamic Terrorism”. This shifts the focus away from racially determined behaviour and onto the abstract level where they can use the event to their advantage. I.e. Boko Haram will be associated with the palestinians, Iran and so on.

  8. Mr. Dithers
    Posted May 10, 2014 at 9:17 am | Permalink

    The population explosion of sub-Saharan Africans to 2.4 billion wouldn’t be cause for concern if it weren’t for the fact that a goodly number of them will migrate to Europe, Scandinavia, the British Isles, Canada and America. As long as Jews maintain their grip on power throughout the West, and I see no reason why they won’t, our immigration policies will continue to facilitate third world colonization and white genocide.

  9. WWWM
    Posted May 11, 2014 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    I received more useful information from this piece than any of the Boko Haram stories I have heard from the mainstream media. I don’t know if Counter-Currents has done a review of the movie Africa Addio (1968), but that would be an excellent compliment to the article above. It was the end result of film-makers spending three years in Africa during a period of decolonization. The producers of the documentary try to remain liberal, but they also try to show the truth. On a subject like this, unless you go all out to whitewash the facts, the brutal truth comes charging through. Africa Addio is probably the best documentary film ever made, but it will not discussed in modern times as the conclusions are not comforting.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted May 12, 2014 at 1:08 am | Permalink

      Trevor Lynch has been meaning to write somethings on Africa Addio for several years. Will promote its priority.

      • R_Moreland
        Posted May 14, 2014 at 4:44 am | Permalink

        Yes, please do a review of Africa Addio. It’s available on DVD and via various online formats. There’s also a paperback book version which covers the same ground.

        Right from the ground zero of independence, the trend was set for Africa: the reversion to barbarism, the attacks on white civilization, and the liberal immersion in self-delusion.

        In Africa the West has created a vacuum and they call it progress.

        Good one! Tacitus is smiling, somewhere.

  10. Armor
    Posted May 13, 2014 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    “In other words, the hegemonic White man abolishes slavery, but the empowered Black man simply ignores this and brings it right back in again. Let the Liberals sit and ponder that one, before they find a way to blame it all on White racism again.”

    And also, let the Liberals figure out a way to use the Boko Haram story to justify more immigration from Nigeria to Europe and the USA.

  11. R_Moreland
    Posted May 14, 2014 at 5:09 am | Permalink

    Africa has been a testing ground for the reality of race.

    No matter how well prepared for independence, no matter the level of Western assimilation, no matter how much foreign aid cash and NGO warm & fuzzies–Africans revert to the baseline. A more enlightened age (say in any white country a century ago) would look at the genetic factors involved. But in the current Dark Age, science must give way to that-which-feels-good. It’s not even fair to call post-modern liberalism an “ideology.” Rather, it’s become a delusion which creates an alternative reality that sends down the memory hole the endless parade of post-colonial African dictators, warlords, kleptocrats, failed states, farm attacks, religious pogroms, massacres, revivals of slavery and everything else illiberal. Instead, the telescreens give us nonstop We Are the World.

    Perhaps the Western world can leave Africa to self-destruct, exploiting the chaos to extract resources. But there are a couple dilemmas. One is the ongoing attacks against whites in the countries formerly known as Rhodesia and South Africa. I don’t think I have to go into too much detail about that here. We do have an obligation to salvage what we can of them.

    The other dilemma is that Africans are not confining themselves to their own continent. They are now moving en masse into Europa and North America, assisted by the usual suspects. It’s a movement of peoples, a sort of reverse colonization. Given the racial factors, black Africans moving into first world countries are going to have the impact that the Huns had back in the 4th and 5th centuries AD.

    Future generations will look at the waves of rioting which have swept across European cities in recent years in the same way we look at the pillaging of cities by barbarian hordes. And the formerly white cities gutted and replaced with gangbanger satrapies as this or that barbarian warlord staking out his territory. The future will wonder, “How did they let that happen?”

    It’s a good question, with the answer coming down to ignoring the reality of race.

    Perhaps Counter Currents could do a time capsule, a message to future historians explaining how the Western world came to this inanity?

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    Here’s the Thing

    Trevor Lynch: Part Four of the Trilogy

    Graduate School with Heidegger

    It’s Okay to Be White


    The Enemy of Europe

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace