1,610 words
In chess, we all know that the aim is to checkmate your opponent’s king. But this does not mean that in the normal course of play it’s wise to aim all your firepower directly at him. After all, he’s often pretty well protected, and directing your pieces in such an obvious way might leave you vulnerable to counterattack. Thus, it’s usually best to first meet fire with fire in the middle of the board before you go king hunting.
It’s not a perfect analogy for what I am about to share with you, but it’ll do.
Earlier this month, Florida governor Ron DeSantis declared the Muslim Brotherhood and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) to be terrorist organizations. This follows on the heels of Governor Greg Abbott of Texas who did the same thing in November. Donald Trump also began probing in this direction in November when he signed an executive order directing key members of his administration to look into whether certain chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood should be designated as terrorist organizations.
This means that in Florida state agencies will be investigating these organizations for any wrongdoing, as well as “denying privileges or resources to anyone providing material support,” according to a tweet by DeSantis. In another tweet, he stated:
Members of the FL Legislature are crafting legislation to stop the creep of sharia law, and I hope that they codify these protections for Floridians against CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood in their legislation.
Similar measures will be taken in Texas where the organizations are banned from buying land and the state Attorney General will be able to “sue to shut them down,” according to The Gateway Pundit. Buying land might be a particularly important issue in Texas given that the East Plano Islamic Center is planning to build a 1,000-home Muslim settlement 40 minutes north of Dallas.
According to Gateway:
The so-called “Sharia City” would come complete with a mosque, Muslim schools, community college, and sporting facilities while serving as a reminder of Islam’s growing influence across America and the Western world.
Despite these differences, it seems that DeSantis and Abbott are on the same page—Islam poses an insidious threat to Western civilization which must be stopped by all legal means. And impeding CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood in their states makes for a good start. If all the knife crime, no-go zones, rapes, terrorism, grooming gangs, and sharia courts in Islamicized Western countries like England are any indication, they are not wrong.
Again, according to Gateway (emphasis mine):
An internal 1991 strategy paper for the Muslim Brotherhood’s U.S. Shura Council — “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America” (Mohamed Akram/Mohamed Adlouni), outlines a long-term, incremental plan to embed and expand Islamic influence across American society. Seized by the FBI and entered into evidence at the Holy Land Foundation trial, the memo describes a “civilization-jihadist” process: patient settlement (tamkeen) by individuals, families, institutions, and organizations; coalition-building to unite Muslim groups under Brotherhood leadership; and the creation or co-optation of front organizations in education, relief, politics, and professional life.
The memorandum emphasizes stealth and persistence over open confrontation: build cultural authority, neutralize opposition, and use legal, political, and social levers to transform institutions. While it uses blunt language about “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within,” its operational advice is practical and gradual, to found and coordinate organizations, influence mosques, charities, schools, media, law, and politics, and patiently shift institutions until Islamic values predominate. As such, the document is direct evidence that the Brotherhood pursued a covert, methodical program of institutional penetration in North America, tying ideological aims to concrete organizational and coalition strategies for long-range influence.
Trump, on the other hand, seems to be leaving CAIR aside for the time being and instead is focusing more on the international threats the Brotherhood poses. It has a long history of destabilizing regimes in the Middle East through violence and grassroots organizing, which may be why Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Jordan have all outlawed it. It also has been the inspiration for al-Qaeda, ISIS, and other Jihadist organizations. More to the point, however, is the Brotherhood’s support of Hamas, which, as we all know, is the sworn enemy of Israel. For years Hamas has been responsible for countless suicide bombings, rocket attacks, and other military operations against Israel, including the October 7th attack in 2023 which killed over 1,200 Israelis and took around 250 of them hostage. (Israel, it must be said, has been retaliating ever since in an attempt to ethnically cleanse the Gazans from Gaza, killing many tens of thousands.)
So, despite all the good that would come out of curtailing the destructive force that is Islam in the West, many will point to the Muslim Brotherhood-Hamas connection and claim that the real reason why Trump, DeSantis, and Abbott are cracking down these groups is because they are cucking for Israel. This is exactly the point CAIR made when responding to DeSantis earlier this month:
On Tuesday, Dec. 8, Gov. DeSantis issued an executive order baselessly and unlawfully declaring CAIR Florida as a terrorist organization; his proclamation follows a similar political move by Gov. Abbott late last month. Both actions are part of an Islamophobic smear campaign by Israel-first politicians and individuals in response to rising anti-genocide sentiment over the past two years and represent yet another attempt by elected officials to chill free speech and silence legitimate criticism of the state of Israel.
This was fairly clever on the part of CAIR, attempting to split the American Right with its favorite wedge issue: Israel and the Jews. And there is some truth to what they say. DeSantis and Abbott are notorious Israel boosters who are always on the lookout for anti-Semitism. And while Trump may be slightly less servile to our friends in the little hats, his recent bombing excursion in Iran tells us he knows what side of his bread his butter is on. So according to CAIR at least, if you support this recent legislation, you also support not only Israel’s ongoing “genocide” in Gaza, but also the two-faced, spineless politicians who put Israel’s interests before America’s.
Obviously, CAIR has been paying attention to the American Right, because these are exactly the things the Right has been complaining about for years now. And with good reason. The disproportionate control that liberal Jewish elites and Israelis wield over America is frankly shameful. That being said, this does not mean we should give CAIR or the Muslim Brotherhood a pass. They’re awful as well. CAIR is definitely trying to pull a fast one here, but between the lines, something a little more subtle is going on. CAIR is offering the American Right a choice. Yes, the Right can oppose both Islamic and Jewish influence in their country, and yes, the Right can remain neutral about Israel, Palestine, and the Gaza War. But wouldn’t it be easier to side with Muslims against those nefarious Jews? Wouldn’t you want to have a billion allies in the fight against Zionist hegemony? Don’t you want to take a principled stand against genocide? Don’t you want to reject Jewish censorship and tyranny? And don’t you just hate it when your elected leaders stab you in the back by giving $3 billion to Israel every year while sending off your sons and daughters to fight and die for Israel’s wars?
To bring back the chess analogy, CAIR is basically asking the American Right to abandon the center of the board and launch an ill-advised berserker assault upon the enemy king. If we look at the struggles of the American Right as a chess game, it’s not a stretch to say that the enemy king wears a star of David rather than a cross atop his crown. But in chess the king is weak, despite being the most valuable piece on the board. It must rely on all the other pieces to gain the advantage, just like the liberal Jewish elites do. These other pieces, of course, include blacks, Hispanics, the LGBTQ crowd, woke whites, along with Muslims. The struggles between Muslims and Jews in the Holy Land matter very little on this particular chessboard. What matters is how these disparate entities coalesce into a Leftist identity group which poses an existential threat to the Right, and is largely funded and abetted by Jews. As far as the American Right is concerned Jews and Muslims are on the same team. Any attempt by either to play one against the other—like the trick CAIR is trying to pull—should be ignored.
As for our priorities, however, I believe it is a lot like chess. Targeting the enemy king must come only after achieving a sound position by doing classic chess things, such as fighting for the center, calculating tactics, seizing the open file, et cetera. This means that checking the spread of Islam in America at the cost of two pro-Jewish governors is on balance a good deal. This means that rooting out wokeness in the military at the cost of a fervently Zionist Defense Secretary is a good deal. This means that reducing nonwhite immigration, anti-white racism, DEI, crime, and all forms of socialism at the cost of a philo-Semitic, Israel-friendly president is also a good deal—a better deal than we’ve had for many decades. These deals are not perfect, of course, but over time enough of them will allow right-wing American whites to regain the sound position we once enjoyed in the country we founded and fought for centuries ago.
And then we can deal with the liberal Jewish elites—peacefully yet firmly —in the endgame.
16 comments
Sage advice, Spencer. The chess analogy is an apt one. Thank you for being aware of the JQ but without being fetishistic about it. This article needs to be read and shared; WNs are vulnerable to the manipulation CAIR is trying to pull here.
This article provides some sound tactical advice, distinguishing friend from enemy. Both Jews and Muslims are enemies of the White race. For many years, Jews have agitated for mass third-world migration into the US, Britain, Canada, and Australia, in order to destroy these White nations. Once here, Muslim terrorists often attack and kill Jews. Jews don’t care, as long as White nations are destroyed. However, they will cynically exploit any terrorist attack against them, in order to enforce more laws against Whites. Don’t fall for their tricks, but also don’t fall for the tricks of the Muslims.
Don’t let CAIR sucker us into giving them our support. On the contrary, we should support all efforts to outlaw Muslim terrorist groups and to expel all non-Whites, even at the cost of sometimes furthering Jewish interests. Later on, we can also fight the Jews and their subversive schemes. We can start by cancelling all aid to Israel, including financial, military and diplomatic aid. We do this to benefit America and the White race, not to help Muslims. But that will be later. First, we must deal with the Muslim problem.
In the future, it probably will be necessary to get skilled at playing factions off against each other. I know this sounds pretty Machiavellian, but it’s no different from what’s been done to us.
If memory serves William Pierce in Hunter/TurnerDiaries, David Lane in KD Rebel, and Covington in his quartet all talk about playing blacks against chicanos, jews against muslims, and so on.
They hate each other almost as bad as they hate us.
Interesting take. One thing I wonder about is whether the King is so weak in the real life scenario like he is on a chess board. Certainly he (or they) once was, by shear numbers if nothing else. But today the most powerful weapon is intelligence, and the Js have plenty of that both in the old-fashioned human variety and the modern artificial variety. And they have boatloads of money, which is also a powerful weapon. Although there is merit in the strategy described, I don’t think we can ignore the Js the way one can ignore the opposing King on a chess board until all his defenses have been neutralized. While it is folly to devote all resources to taking them down instead of working “the middle of the board,” we still have to exploit their vulnerabilities in the present.
We just have to remember that the chessboard analogy isn’t completely exact. To get further down into the details, there is a White side, though some of the White pieces are acting as pawns but could be a lot more powerful (conservatives), some that have walked off the board (apolitical or apathetic), and some that defected for the other side (liberals, feminists, radical GLBTs, and other rebels without a clue). Looking closer at the Black side, we find that they’re really a big heterogenous multicolored coalition. Often they can be broken down into further factions yet.
Normally each race and ethnic subdivision thereof has its natural priorities, self-interests, and relations (good or bad) with its neighbors. Going back to the analogy, cultural Marxism is the glue binding the Black side together. If we can dissolve the glue, then the chessboard stops being one united front against us, and instead a multipolar struggle of smaller coalitions. When the players on the other side go back to working for their natural interests, it’ll take a lot of heat off of us. Our own turncoats will hopefully realize the error of their ways. If we play our cards right, might even get some enemy defectors taking our side, even though our goal is to get them into their own territories.
Good article
The main reason to not get involved in the current Jewish/Islamic conflict is that pointing out hypocrisy is our main weapon to raising white identity. By being aloof and apathetic to their conflict, we can point out the hypocritical, two-faced nature of both sides. If we get involved, we risk getting tarred with their same hypocrisy along the way. It’s why it’s stupid to try and deny the jews, or the Palestinians, a right to have a homeland while we argue to restore ours. Both of their sides give facetious support for liberal norms while advancing their own ethnic interests, they are fighting for ethno-states for themselves while insisting the west is for everyone. You simply cannot get involved without getting mired in hypocrisy. Both sides know this too, it would be useful for the jews if whites get drawn to the pro-Palestinian cause over the white nationalist cause, as they can act as if the west is hypocritical in wanting to restore their homelands while denying the jews theirs. They then do whataboutisms to deflect away from people pointing out their hostile influence in western societies.
The Zionist supporting boomers are a benefit for the Islamists as well, as they can justify their struggle against the west as a struggle against Israel, and retroactively justify their imposing Islamism as being a consequence of western aggression instead of a form of western suicide. The Islamists do have plenty of examples from the most good goy zionist whites being hypocritical in their support of Israel. The conflict should have as much relevance for us as the Sikh/Hindu conflict that’s being imposed on Canada. “Take that fight back to India, where it belongs”, that’s the stance there, a similar stance should be taken for the Islamists and the Jews.
One thing the Camp of the Saints got correct is that replacement migrants will NEVER admit this was suicide on our part, the replacement migrants will always apply historical revisionisim to make themselves out to be righteous conquerors. “You were over there, so we are over here” is a common slogan now used by the replacement migrants, which is them already beginning this process of historical revisionism. The moral blackmail, egalitarian ideals and bleeding heart sob stories are actually embarrassing to them. They come groveling and get in through insincere pleading, but deep in the hearts they want to be the stronger party, and always want to have been the stronger party. Not getting involved helps deny them of some of their moral justifications against us, taking some oxygen away from the fire.
Plus I just genuinely don’t care about the conflict lol.
…while serving as a reminder of Islam’s growing influence across America and the Western world.
Great article! How can anyone read that line, and not cringe. Yep, this new comment tool bar definitely sucks, I still haven’t figured out what the “open hand” does, but the “peace sign” is for posting urls. 🙃
Muslims: “Take our side! We just want to live peacefully like leeches in your lands because we can’t fight the Jews on their terms in Palestine.”
Bunch of cucks.
Jews aren’t even the best fighters on the planet and the Muslims are literally running away to take over countries that will collapse once they themselves are in charge.
“Wah wah, gay people! Take pity on me!”
Pathetic.
Excellent piece, and your conclusion is correct. We can critique the misuse of Jewish power on terms that make sense to both Jews and gentiles. We cannot have the same exchange with Muslims.
Periodically, we should all check in on the website http://www.thereligionofpeace.com which monitors the atrocities committed by Muslims all over the world.
We might also consider periodically visiting the blog “Gates of Vienna,” where today I was confronted with the following two observations:
“42 Muslim Americans win in US elections”
“94 percent of Muslim politicians and candidates — including Zohran Mamdani and Virginia Lt. Gov. Ghazala Hashmi — won’t express support for the U.S. Constitution.”
Typical Zionist propaganda: “All Muslims are evil, therefore Israel can do what it wants.”
Hm. Right. That’s what I was saying.
The power of certain Jewish organizations and individuals in the West is incomparably greater than the king in chess. This analogy is so bad, it should not be used. And the most powerful asset to make the West do their bidding is the Holocaust moral ideology. However, constant criticism of Israeli war crimes will diminish its influence. And I don’t see how whites could be accused of hypocrisy if they stress that the Palestinians are entitled to their own state, just like whites. To define this as ‘siding with the Arabs’ seems quite unfair.
It is clear that the US started to get screwed up in the 1960’s by elimination of moral laws (Holywood cinema code), destruction of ethnic and religious cohesion (internal migration, housing, churches), then by post-1971 debt-based economy and imperial overreach.
The Protestant churches are irrelevant or absent. Catholic church is woke.
There ia a vacuum and Islam is seriously trying to fill it.
The current Muslim Brotherhood’s program for Western civilization (N. America and Europe) is pretty explicit:
“While it uses blunt language about “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within,” its operational advice is practical and gradual, to found and coordinate organizations, influence mosques, charities, schools, media, law, and politics, and patiently shift institutions until Islamic values predominate.”
This is clearly a war by other means. This is a militant Islam, in a sheep’s clothing.
There are some thinkers like Mr. Jones who consider Catholic – Muslim alliance, presumably to save the western societies from self-destruction:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3WgJUQaU8oP0
Even Mr. Carlson expressed some admiration for Middle East Muslim states.
Are the US center-right/right political and social elites seeing some light or just blundering ?
I believe the term was “counter-signaling” that if I recall, the author of this article, came up with the term. It basically describes using the tactics/arguments of your political opponents to cynically curry favor from them. That’s what we see with CAIRs rhetoric, using words like “Israel first.” It’s beyond cynical and patronizing. Unfortunately, groyper types will eat it up.
I think this could be a stepping stone to further blacklisting subversive organizations like the ADL and the SPLC. Arguably the king(s) on the chessboard. But it is interesting that this chess metaphor is being used in the context of multiple fronts in the form of Jewish power and Muslim power. Arguably there is a burgeoning Indian power but we also have a bunch of other groups to boot: blacks, Hispanics, LGBTQ, etc. I think we are beginning to see the final form of the multicultural mess spawned by the 1965 immigration act and all the “diversity is our greatest strength!” propaganda millennials such as myself endured during the 90’s. By and large, it’s a coalition of the fringes against the whites.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.