116 words
A documentary is being made of Thomas Goodrich’s harrowing Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947, which exposes Allied atrocities against Germans in the closing months and aftermath of the Second World War. For excerpts, a review, and an interview on Hellstorm, click here.
Thomas Goodrich and the director of the documentary are looking for volunteers to translate the script for subtitles in the following languages:
- German
- French
- Italian
- Spanish
- Arabic
- Farsi
- Hindi
- Japanese
And, really, any other languages in which the film has significant numbers of potential viewers. (A Chinese translator has already been lined up.)
If you wish to take part in this project, please email me at [email protected].
Greg Johnson
Editor-in-Chief
27 Comments
‘Dude’. Count me in.
Try telling someone, anyone, about the countless Allied atrocities committed against unarmed Germans, including fleeing, panicked women, old men & children, and they just say, it was payback for all their own atrocities done during the War. That’s it. End of discussion. Can’t make any headway. Everyone’s socalled brain is thoroughly washed. They don’t CARE about what our noble Allies did to the Enemy.
I have known quite a few soldiers who fought in WW II. They’re dead now, of course. I remember this: they didn’t want to talk about the war. What they enjoyed was going to the veterans club and drinking themselves stupid. When I was a teenager, one old fella said to me, “War is Hell” after explaining to me why there was a bayonet on their rifle and precisely how it was used.
I agree. Apart from people who are already race-conscious, I have never met anyone who did not respond to revelations of Allied war crimes with either: 1) The Germans did worse. 2) The Germans started it and so deserve what they got.
Then again, I live in ‘Murika. Perhaps other peoples are not so invested in the current WWII narrative and could benefit from this work.
The sad fact is that the Germans didn’t know how to wage that war. For some reason they had a mental block; they just couldn’t understand that the Jews and their servants were out to wipe their country off the face of the earth. Why on Earth did Hitler spend so much time trying to reason with the British? He knew full well who controlled their government.
The Germans followed the Geneva Convention while no one else did. They cared for the POWs they took while the Allies couldn’t care less what happened to theirs. They never bombed civilian targets while the Allies couldn’t wait to kill as many German civilians as possible. They fed and clothed Jews whose cousins in the USSR and UK were literally screaming for the genocide of the German people. It was insane. Right from the start L.F. Celine knew the Germans would lose the war because they were soft and lacked the mercilessness of the Bolsheviks.
But I’m not going to say the Germans were more noble, because there’s no nobility in a war like WWII when the fate of an entire race is on the line. You either win or lose. The Germans should have gotten nasty, and they never did. They didn’t even freaking enforce the order to execute all captured commissars! They actually stopped the peoples of Eastern Europe from taking bloody revenge on their Jewish tormentors.
As much as I admire the German soldiers and the fight they put up, Celine was right. They were too soft. Too by-the-book, too romantic, too Christian, too civilized. Hitler believed Providence would take care of everything while the Jews knew that when you wage war, you need to wage it in a genocidal manner. If only the Germans had realized that, they would have won. But they didn’t, and know we are all paying the price.
When this documentary is complete, I seriously hope that it is genuinely balanced and factually accurate, unlike the absurd comment above. Churchill may be to blame for civilian bombing in the Anglo-German theatre of war but the Germans did indeed bomb civilian targets before that, with devastating effect, in Warsaw and Rotterdam. The idea that Allied POWs were given soft treatment is similarly absurd, as more than half of Soviet POWs in German captivity died by the war’s end. These facts can be very easily obtained by means of a quick internet search. Trying to sanitise or ignore Axis atrocities is counter-productive.
Goodrich himself said that any atrocities the Germans committed were miniscule compared to what the Allies did.
Furthermore it should be understood that a German victory, even with actual (as opposed to fictional) atrocities, would have secured Europe’s existence and the survival of Whites across the world. Whining about comparatively minor German atrocities is useless for us.
Warsaw and Rotterdam were military targets, unlike Dresden. I should have said that the Luftwaffe never intentionally targeted civilians, unlike the Allies.
Where did you read that over half of Soviet POWs died in German camps? Are these the same people who say the Germans killed six million Jews? Stalin had scores of Soviet POWs shot upon their return to the USSR, what makes you think they didn’t blame their deaths on the Germans the way they blamed the Katyn massacre on them?
Goodrich himself said that any atrocities the Germans committed were miniscule compared to those of the Allies. Furthermore I do not believe in moral equality between Germany and the Allies. Whatever the Germans did, they did for Europe and the European people. I wish they had done more.
I do not know the circumstances of the Rotterdam bombing, but I expect that like most things on WW II where the Germans are accused of wrongdoing you have to do extensive research to discard the mountains of lies before you get to the truth.
The blame for WW II belongs firmly to the British and French who attacked Germany when Germany was only fighting for German people’s rights. This alone is a fact, but contradicts everything people are commonly told. The British, under orders from Churchill (we know this, it’s an established fact) continuously attacked German civilian targets, while Germany was attacking British military installations because Churchill wanted Germany to attack civilian targets to widen the war and bring other countries like the USA into it by pointing at “NAZI atrocities.” I suggest you watch David Irving’s speech on Churchill available on youtube. I am sure Germany had no desire to kill Dutch civilians either, but if you want to read fairy tales about evil Germans, read Jewish run Wikipedia. I am certain Holland was attacked for nothing worse than strategic reasons, the same way the British attacked Iceland, Iran and would have attacked Norway if Germany hadn’t beaten them to it, so as not to be cut off vital natural resources.
There would have been no war in France, Britain, Holland or any other country in the west, except that Britain and France wanted war and they started it. Wars are started all the time; the USA continuously attacks countries, Israel does too. Before WW II, it was the British who went all over the world attacking others, whether it was the Boers or whoever. Germany didn’t “start” WW II, it started a war with Poland, a country created twenty years earlier with a large amount of German territory and millions of Germans living there. Germany tried very hard to find a peaceful solution with Poland and Britain, the USA and in particular Jews (who already played leading roles in those countries) did everything to start a big war against Germany.
The German military asked Polish forces defending Warsaw to surrender to prevent an attack on the city and they refused, thus prompting Germany’s attack. Poles were committing revolting atrocities against Germans, cutting soldiers eyes out, attacking ethnic Germans and other atrocities. This may have played a role too, as this is how wars get worse and worse as each side ups the ante.
But what do the British, French and the Americans have to do with Poland? Did Germany attack Britain for its brutalization of Indians or others?
Here is how the USA got in. If there is ever a country that deserves to have done to it, what it did to others it is the USA:
In early 1938 the Polish ambassador to the US, Jerzy Potocki reported back to Warsaw on his observations of the American political scene:
The pressure of the Jews on President Roosevelt and on the State Department is becoming ever more powerful… The Jews are right now the leaders in creating a war psychosis which would plunge the entire world into war and bring about general catastrophe. This mood is becoming more and more apparent. In their definition of democratic states, the Jews have also created real chaos; they have mixed together the idea of democracy and communism, and have above all raised the banner of burning hatred against Nazism.
This hatred has become a frenzy. It is propagated everywhere and by every means: in theaters, in the cinema, and in the press. The Germans are portrayed as a nation living under the arrogance of Hitler which wants to conquer the whole world and drown all of humanity in an ocean of blood. In conversations with Jewish press representatives, I have repeatedly come up against the inexorable and convinced view that war is inevitable. This international Jewry exploits every means of propaganda to oppose any tendency towards any kind of consolidation and understanding between nations. In this way, the conviction is growing steadily but surely in public opinion here that the Germans and their satellites, in the form of fascism, are enemies who must be subdued by the ‘democratic world.’ (February 9) 32
On January 12, 1939 Ambassador Potocki reported back to Warsaw:
The feeling now prevailing in the United States is marked by a growing hatred of Fascism and, above all, of Chancellor Hitler and everything connected with Nazism. Propaganda is mostly in the hands of the Jews, who control almost 100 percent radio, film, daily and periodical press. Although this propaganda is extremely coarse and presents Germany as black as possible—above all religious persecution and concentration camps are exploited—this propaganda is nevertheless extremely effective, since the public here is completely ignorant and knows nothing of the situation in Europe. …
While the so called ‘atrocities’ you mentioned are true, they only started and increased towards the second part of the war for 2 main reasons:
1. Germany simply couldn’t uphold the Geneva convention due to mere logistics. They were fighting at odds of 100’s to 1 in population, land mass and resources.
2. Legitimate hatred perfectly illustrated by a quote by Jochen Peiper: “I recognize that after the battle of Normandy my unit was composed mainly of young, fanatical soldiers. A good deal of them had lost their parents, their sisters and brothers during the bombing. They had seen for themselves in Köln thousands of mangled corpses after a terror raid had passed. Their hatred for the enemy was such, I swear it, I could not always keep it under control.”
By principle however the Germans WERE indeed (too) noble. Especially in the first part of the war. when Hitler for example spared the English puppets at Duinkerke. Many, among which Otto Skorzeny, also claimed that Germany absolutely could’ve been the first nuclear power, but that Hitler explicitly and categorically refused to even consider using such a weapon against our (thus also his) people.
Ps. great initiative by the way
“Many, among which Otto Skorzeny, also claimed that Germany absolutely could’ve been the first nuclear power, but that Hitler explicitly and categorically refused to even consider using such a weapon against our (thus also his) people. ”
If that’s true, that’s the decision that delivered the entire world into the hands of the Jew and sealed our fate. If the Germans had developed the nuclear bomb they could have wiped out Moscow and London for good and spared millions of lives. Then they could have forced the USA to sign a treaty, and the war would have been over.
I simply don’t want to believe Hitler was stupid enough to order nuclear weapons to not be developed for moral reasons. Unfortunately it wouldn’t surprise me if it were true.
I agree with your assesment that such a decision was very unfortunate in retrospect, but I’m convinced that it was actually made. There are a couple of strong indications in that direction, apart from first hand witnesses like the mentioned Skorzeny:
1) It would be rather consistent with the overall German chivalry in battle, sometimes bordering on stupidity. One of the many examples is when the Germans tried to preserve the beautiful monastery of Monte Cassino. Although hopelessly outnumbered against the advancing American puppets they didn’t want to occupy the monestary eventhough it would’ve given them a superb strategic advantage. Kesselring has informed the allied puppets of his intentions not to occupy the monestary but the allies didn’t believe he wouldn’ use such a valuable position and bombed the place anyway…
2) The German scientists have outperformed their allied counterparts in all military technology with the possible exception of radar. They were especially lightyears ahead with regard to rocket science. It is well known that the German rocket scientists later played the leading role in the moon landing etc.
3) Hitler always had the tendency to refrain from violence against our own (White) people. Even going back before the ascension to power his goal wasn’t as much about fighting and beating the communists as it was about ‘winning them over’. A hostile White man was certainly considered as misguided rather than as being the ‘enemy’.
All in all I can’t say that the Germans were too soft on the Jews because I tend to largely believe in the Holocast – minus the claimed extent and many outrageous lies and exagerations. But they certainly were too soft on our own misguided people.
I see I have been beaten to the punch but here goes anyway. While Hadrian’s comment is a little overwrought the scale of the bombing campaigns are hardly comparable. A careful reading of the Wikipedia article on the Rotterdam Blitz seems to support Hadrian’s argument more than yours with some bombers turning back and the Germans practically apologizing afterwards. A lot of the damage was also caused by secondary fires. Rotterdam had also been evacuated and was on the eve of a major tank and infantry assault. It was being actively defended in the midst of a land battle. I don’t think it could be used to justify deliberate saturation bombing raids with thousands of bombers to bomb the enemy civilian population back into the “stone age” some years later. Also Allied bombers often targeted cities that were not very industrial and were harbouring many refugees such as Dresden.
Themistocles:
For some time now, the book Bombing Vindicated by J.M.Spaight, a British official in the Air Ministry, is available from Ostara Publications as a re-print. The British rationale of bombing is laid out there, from an official point of view.
The German use of the bomb weapon was tactical, i.e., in direct support of the fighting force on the ground. Such it was in Rotterdam, such it was in Warsaw. The city of Warsaw had been given twice time to surrender, it was proposed by the German military command that the population withdraw to a part of the city that was to be spared by the threatened bombardment to force surrender, the diplomats were given time to evacuate. To no avail, the city commander of Warsaw refused. Rotterdam was also asked to surrender and the commander refused, and a bombing squadron was sent to lend force to the demand to surrender. While the bombers were on their way, the city surrendered and the bombers were recalled, most returned but a few could not be contacted, so they flew on on caused the damage. About 800 people perished.
While this is terrible, the German use of the bombers was of a purely tactical kind on the frontline to support the troupes on the ground, as in Warsaw. The deliberate bombing of cities far away from the frontline is an entirely different matter and was adopted by the British, as freely and proudly admitted by Spaight in Bombing Vindicated (1944). The much-cited bombing of Coventry had also reasons other than simply terrorizing the civilian population. Coventry was a center of arms production with legitimate military targets. About 500 died there.
Contrast this to the bombing of the township of Biberach/Riß where I attended school for several years. In late March 1945 an American flight detachment was sent to some other city to bombard, but lost its way in the foggy weather and attacked Biberach instead. 287 people died by this mistake of navigation, numerous houses were destroyed. Unless you were from Biberach, you would never know about that, and such events are just swept under the carpet. While the 800 dead of Rotterdam constitute a major point of accusation against Germany, the 287 of Biberach are not even a footnote, the 500 dead of Coventry are somehow very terrible in the approved annals of the 2nd War, the 250000 dead of Dresden are not even given a decent burial, as there number has been arithmetically reduced to 25000 so-far, to be shrunk in the near future even more. You are quite outraged about Rotterdam, but have probably never heard of the thousands of casual bombings (such as, e.g. on the afternoon of the 19th July 1944 in Albstadt/Ebingen) with the death of, amongst many others, the fiancee of my uncle), and these casual bombings occurred because of the bombing directive of Churchill/Lindemann to terrorize the German population far from the front, not in support of the Allied frontline soldier. This is called “strategic bombing”, the strategy being to destroy everything, even a possible peace after the fighting stops.
The story of the Soviet POW also needs to be put in the right perspective:
There were such huge numbers of Soviet troops to surrender in the first few months of the campaign that huge problems with supply occurred. Their number went into the millions. I see parallels with the stories about the German concentration camps (poster camp: Bergen-Belsen) where because of supply difficulties and overcrowding due to circumstances caused by evermore chaotic conditions in the last few months of the war, epidemics broke out, the a waterworks had been destroyed by Allied bombing, the dead piled up because the camp personnel started to fall victim to the the epidemic also… from this, the eager anti-German propaganda construed a tale of murder and unimaginable cruelty.
To return to Thomas Goodrich’s book:
I have the book an I have major difficulties reading it. This book speaks of facts the reality of which you can see in every German city, on maps, in the startling regression of cultural achievement every day, in the frantic maintenance of the official justification narrative of the 2nd war, the unending childish demonization of Hitler, and the catastrophic breakdown of German self-assertion.
The brutality against Germany did something irremediable to the Germans as living links of Germandom, and has thrown the victorious nations also into a frenzy of self-justification. All of this is very unhealthy . Can it have a good ending-someday?
To put everything in perspective, the side of the story as given by Thomas Goodrich in a sweeping manner, needs to be known as well.
Thanks so much, Greg, for your help. Already a number of dedicated individuals from around the world have offered their help with translations. Still need translators for French, Italian, Hindi, Portuguese, Arabic, and other languages, but I am confident these will materialize.
No one needs worry about truth or accuracy in this film or the whitewashing of purported German crimes. This movie, like the book, does not address crimes attributed to the vanquished by the victors, nor will it give “equal time” to the Allied version of the so-called “Good War.” Anyone who wants that spin just needs to visit their local library or turn on the TV. No, this film is not about what the Germans did to the world, it’s about what the world did to the Germans; the monstrous crimes the world committed against Germany, during and after the war, crimes so hideous and evil that there are no words in the English language to accurately describe them; crimes that have been buried by the victors under a mountain of lies and propaganda for 70 years. My sense so far is that the movie will be a fitting, and long overdue monument, to those poor wretched souls, the voiceless victims of the world’s worst war.
Again, Greg, thank you and your great audience for all the help.
So far, we have had volunteers to translate into the following languages:
1. German (4x)
2. Russian (2x)
3. Dutch
4. Spanish (3x)
5. Danish
6. Farsi
7. Turkish
8. Czech
9. Polish
10. Portuguese
11. Swedish
Maybe my Girlfriend can translate it to japanese
P.S. She’s white.
My father was in submarine service in Pacific and my Uncle was shot in Italy. They didn’t do anything wrong. my Uncle came home on a hospital ship. He limped all his life. He said we shot. That’s what we did. And they shot at us. 420,000 of ours blood is in the ground. I understand the Germans were never allowed to grieve and an injustice is done to them daily. Do not exchange black legend for more black legend. Exchange one injustice to do another. That is what you are doing in your zeal. You have problems of omission , context and even fact.
Your uncle limped all his life because rich Jews sent him thousands of miles across the sea to destroy the people who were defending the White race from those very Jews. Blame the Jews for starting the war.
This is a very worthy project of Mr. Johnson’s and Goodrich’s. It’s a TOTALLY NEGLECTED STORY, HARDLY KNOWN IN THE U.S. and would do justice to the enormous number of ethnic Germans and other essentially innocent Germans who suffered so terribly. There are some groups of ethnic Germans, who lived outside the Reich at that time and are now operating around various U.S. states, who are telling their personal stories and what they witnessed, but they aren’t widely known or receive wide exposure. They are certainly not being supported by ANY MAIN STREAM MEDIA SOURCES.
The truth will eventually come out. It’s inevitable. There’s no way any sane or rational person 50 years from now will see Hitler and the National Socialists as evil. How long did it take people to stop calling Napoleon the “scourge of Europe?” The important thing is that Whites see the light before we go extinct.
German/French/Japanese translations could be taken care of by me. Heil.
Please email me at [email protected]
It is no accident that the same forces which would allow the massacres and ethnic cleansing of Teutons in East Prussia, Pomerania, Silesia and Sudetenland would also preside over the ethnic cleansing of their own people in America and England. Fighting for the World Masters was not only unnatural, it was also futile. This shows how all Western civilization suffers from an internal fight. The Third Reich is not blameless; if the pan-German movement could have been a pan-European movement, hundreds of thousands more Ukranians, Lithuanians, Dutch and French could have stood shoulder to shoulder with the Teutons against the Jewish-led Bolsheviks. They have no more interest in acknowledging Allied War Crimes than release black on white crime reports in the US today.
I could help with Finnish subtitles
Please email me at [email protected]
The true background story on the outbreak of the war-from Germany, where the speaker risked prosecution if what he said wasn’t true:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBLgZAv_Iqo
FDR’s role in inciting the war in Europe:
http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2012/05/poland-as-pawn-hoover-identifies.html
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/v04p135_Weber.html
Dear comrades, I’m the one who has signed up for the the task of rendering Chinese translation of the caption scripts of the documentary film. I’ll do the Japanese translation too. Any one who is able to help with one or more translations of the other languages listed here in the post is welcomed to volunteer to contribute his strength to this greatly meaningful and honorable mission, and whose time and effort is highly valued and appreciated. Let’s join our hands for spreading all these critically important and significant historical facts and truths. Thank you all!