Counter-Currents
http://blueridgecountry.com/articles/mary-the-elephant
Editor’s Note: Yes, I recognize that this picture is unspeakably evil. No offense is meant to elephants.
2,128 words
Counter-Currents Publishing and the North American New Right do not take sides in elections, because no system candidates are on our side. Thus we do not endorse candidates, legislation, ballot initiatives, etc. We do not think of ourselves as citizens of the United States or Canada or any existing white regime. We think of ourselves as exiles from the White Republic to come.
Our aim is to create a new school of thought and social movement that will lay the metapolitical foundations of the White Republic — not to waste time participating in the existing system, which is rigged against us. The present system is not a vehicle that can take us to the White Republic. So we must emotionally and intellectually let it go, so we can focus on building a vehicle that can move us forward.
But it does advance our metapolitical goals to comment on contemporary politics in the United States and other white nations from a White Nationalist point of view. It is in that spirit that we offer our commentary on the 2012 US presidential election.
* * *
I have already argued that it would be better for White Nationalists for Barack Obama to win. Gregory Hood has also argued that it would be better for White Nationalists for Mitt Romney to lose. One of the benefits of a Romney defeat is that it will hasten the day when the Republican Party perishes as an institution, and the destruction of the Republican Party is a good thing for whites in America.
The outcome of the 2012 US presidential election is now in the hands of white working-class voters in the state of Ohio. This is ironic, since this constituency is disdained, exploited, and betrayed by both parties.
Mitt Romney, the candidate for Capital, regards them as uppity, ungrateful peasants whose unions must be broken and who must be replaced by cheaper, more grateful peasants from the Third World, either though immigration or shipping their jobs overseas. And Barack Obama, of course, regards them as just a bunch of Archie Bunkers.
Either party, of course, could have locked these voters in by now, if they had merely promised plausibly to represent white working class interests. Both parties, of course, have no problem promising to look after the interests of Jews, Wall Street, and the big corporations. The Democrats also have no problem promising free stuff to non-whites.
But when it comes to the white working and middle classes, it almost seems like both parties have a fit of conscience. It almost seems that they are hesitant even to lie to them about representing their interests. Instead, they promise nothing and simply try to scare voters into voting against the other party rather than for anything they stand for.
So it all comes down to whether white working class people in Ohio are more afraid of Mitt Romney of Bain Capital and Paul “Privatize It” Ryan — or that creepy mulatto/Muslim/socialist Barack Obama.
The Democratic Party is a coalition of a shrinking population of Jews, a ballooning population of other non-whites, and a shrinking population of alienated and deracinated white liberals. The Republican Party is the de facto party of the shrinking population of normal white Americans.
The Democrats are the party of net tax consumers, of the people who take more than they give. But the Democrats are more insidious than that, for they are also consuming the moral capital of America as well. The Republicans are the party of the people who produce more than they consume and maintain the nation’s moral capital (such as it is).
There is no question that if everybody who votes for Mitt Romney in today’s election dropped dead, America would be finished as a nation. You can’t have a working society when the parasites far outnumber the hosts. But if everybody who votes for Barack Obama dropped dead, most of my family would perish, but America would still survive. America without the Left would be somewhat more prosperous, and there would be far less crime, ugliness, and degeneracy. Unfortunately, it would also be a duller country, culturally-speaking; town and country alike would be befouled by development and pollution; there would also be more wars for Israel; but the country would at least exist.
The Democrats have no problem making explicit appeals to the identity and interests of their constituencies: Jews, non-whites, environmentalists, gays, feminists, etc. But Republicans refuse to make explicit appeals to the identity and interests of whites, even while they pander to Jews and other groups that overwhelmingly vote against them. Nor will Republicans take the necessary steps to preserve the white majority — stopping non-white immigration, addressing higher non-white birthrates — even under the guise of race-neutral programs.
But in a game in which the race or identity card trumps all, the party that refuses to play that card is doomed, and with it their constituency, white America, i.e., America. So why do Republicans persist in playing by rules that doom America and their party?
There are external and internal pressures that maintain this course. The main external pressure is the cultural hegemony of (1) moral universalism and (2) anti-white racism, which most Republicans refuse to challenge. But some Republicans realize that they cannot preserve their party or their nation without rejecting the current rules. This is where the internal pressures come in.
Republicans police their ranks to insure ideological conformity. To mollify the demographic concerns that might lead Republicans to challenge the current rules, they promote transparently dishonest talking points about replacing their shrinking white electorate with non-whites. Those who are not fooled are simply driven out.
To determine who maintains this suicidal ideological consensus and why, follow the money trail. Half the money raised by Republicans comes from Jews (75% for Democrats) and a large percentage of the rest comes from wealthy non-Jews (an even higher percentage for the Democrats).
Capitalist elites, however, do not care about nationalism. They profit from importing non-whites and shipping American jobs to non-white nations.
Jews, of course, care about nationalism: their own nationalism, not American nationalism, which is merely a tool to be used or discarded whenever it serves Jewish interests. As for America, Jews support the same policies as capitalists: easy entry, easy exit.
Both Jews and the plutocracy are threatened by American nationalism and seek to suppress it. Both groups are well aware that that present demographic trends doom the white race in North America and the Republican Party. But both groups do not care.
Indeed, since Jews are more aware than any people of the conditions that promote or prevent genocide, one has to conclude that their promotion of policies conducive to the destruction of the white race is no accident but rather their conscious preference and aim.
In fact, I am convinced that at the core of the Republican Party are people who actively wish to promote the destruction of the white race and the Republican Party. Why am I convinced that the Republicans are being subjected to a controlled demolition from the inside? Because if I were the enemy, that is exactly what I would do.
The enemy fears that the Republicans could, eventually, become desperate enough to actually try to represent and preserve the white majority. They know that if the Republicans simply followed the Sailer Strategy of explicitly appealing to white voters, they could maintain power and would set themselves on the path of actually preserving and enhancing the white majority.
Thus the enemy suppresses dissent and promotes the delusion that the Republicans will be saved by non-whites, knowing that they don’t have to keep up the act much longer, since demographic trends will finish off the Republican Party soon enough. Indeed, the Left is already gloating about it in public. It is now openly acknowledged that this is the last election in which the Republicans can hope to win without appealing explicitly to white racial interests.
That simply means that in the next election cycle, the controllers will redouble their efforts to keep the party on its downward course. Of course this means that they will also redouble their efforts to purge dissenters, and there will be more dissenters to purge as individual Republicans realize that they will have to break the party rules to hold onto their power and perks.
Like the Titanic, will the Republican Party go down in one piece or split in two, giving rise to a more racially populist party? Of course, we should be wary of the human jetsam of the Republican Party. Just because a politician is too “dirty” for the Republicans does not mean he is clean enough to represent white interests.
What do you do when you discover that your house is thoroughly riddled with termites? Do you strip the paint and plaster and try to replace each rotted board one at a time? Do you seek to tweeze out the vermin, hoping that you have gotten them all and that the colony will not flare up again? What happens when you discover that the termites managed to put their name on the deed and are evicting you?
Obviously, you just walk away and let them carry on their work of destruction while you build a new house with better materials, which you have termite-proofed from the start. But, in political terms, what would that mean?
Right-wing populism is the sweet spot in American politics, which is why the establishment fears, loathes, and co-opts it (when forced to). What would a pro-white Right-wing populism look like?
First and foremost, it would have to declare itself explicitly as a vehicle for promoting white interests, including working to preserve and enhance the white majority.
Second, although populism makes the common good the standard of justice, the rich and powerful have the whole system looking out for them, so a Right-wing populist movement would focus on protecting the interests of the white working and middle classes. It would be pro-private property, widely distributed, but against the concentration of wealth. It would promote the creation of small and medium-sized businesses to broaden the middle class. It would promote economic protectionism to restore American manufacturing jobs.
How would such a party be termite-proofed? Not only should it exclude Jews, plutocrats, and free market ideologues from the start, it should also promote policies that would send them packing.
For instance, why not propose radically egalitarian tax policies? Since the Federal government could go back to funding itself with tariffs, how about zero income or capital gains taxes on the first $1 million/year — and 100% confiscation of all income, including capital gains, above $1 million/year? But since we want to encourage artists and inventors who actually create new things (not performing artists), why not exempt them? Why not adopt a Social Credit economy and simply abolish usury? Why not run on a platform of complete debt repudiation?
But wouldn’t America’s richest people, 35% of them Jewish, just up stakes and leave the country? Wouldn’t they renounce their citizenship and move to places with less burdensome taxes? Yes, of course they would. But we want them to leave. We want anybody who can’t make ends meet on $1 million/year, and who is rootless enough to renounce his citizenship over money, to leave. We don’t want people like that having any say over our politics. If we are going to regain control over our destiny, they have to go.
But wouldn’t the economy collapse just like in Atlas Shugged? Yes and no. First of all, we want certain segments of the economy to collapse. No more banks. No more hedge funds. No more day traders, speculators, flippers, and the like. The goal of our system is to have a large, prosperous middle class secure against inflation and deflation, boom and bust, with socialized medicine, short work weeks, generous retirement benefits, “5 to 9” conservative policies, and a green, ecologically sustainable economy. Our people will have generous incomes, and if somebody wants to sell products to them, we don’t care where they live or what race they are, so long as the products are manufactured by our people, within our borders.
A Right-wing populist movement within the present system is not the same thing as White Nationalism. It might not be a suitable vehicle to bring about White Nationalism, although we are watching the Golden Dawn carefully. But such a movement would go a long way toward breaking up the current power structure, radicalizing and racializing the white population in the process. And that would definitely be good for White Nationalism.
The defeat of Mitt Romney will hasten the day that the Republican Party perishes and the White Republic emerges.
Notice: Trying to get property 'ID' of non-object in /home/clients/030cab2428d341678e5f8c829463785d/sites/counter-currents.com/wp-content/themes/CC/php/helpers/custom_functions_all.php on line 164
46 comments
Actively promoting our gradual departure from the judaeo-economic system, the creation of collaborating informal intentional communities and social-economic networks, busting up the high concentration of wealth, promoting distributist and EGI-based social nationalist principles, facilitating an increased ethnic/racial balkanization that could lead to a future white ethnostate on the North American continent, a wonderful assessment of our present situation re Mitt Obama and the future of the Republocrats – now you’re talking, Greg. One of your best articles.
“One of your best articles.”
And timely, as all of us wake up to four more years of a halfrican who hates Whites as much as Republicans fear identifying with their race.
This artice is one of the best. It stresses how its important it is to dissassociate from conservative ideas. When the white middle class was prosperous they bought into conservative economic ideas such as lower taxation and deregulation while shielding themselves from diversity in the suburbs. This will not longer be the case as the white middle class is declining economically and their lower economic status will force them to deal with diversity directly. The key to appealing to this constituency is economics and conservative economic policies are no longer going to cut it.
I agree with Robert Stark that this article expresses what a properly nationalist stance should be towards the Republicans. As a foreign observer, I can’t for the life of me understand why intelligent members of the so-called Alternative Right advocate such delusional plans as the pro-majority or Sailer strategy. Why would a constituency that’s routinely betrayed and openly disdained by the Republicans want to be courted by the same party? Why would you want to align yourself with the very party that’s disenfranchised you for decades?
The system in the US allows only two viable parties-the rest are joke parties for hobbyists. With the GOP on the fast track to extinction, anti-NYC/DC/Hollywood pro-decentralist coalitions should work to increase options for the post-GOP world by implementing PR at the state and local level. If Greece had archaic Anglo-American plurality Golden Dawn would have never been able to rise out of nowhere and none of us would have heard of it.
What are the short-term and long-term political objectives? What is the over-arching strategy – the road-map to the White Republic? If not plan A, what then for plan B?
If American white nationalists are going to have any relevance in politics, we have to utilize the inertial flow. The country is tearing itself apart along geographic and ideological boundaries – this process will only increase as internal stresses grow. Why not assist the natural dissolution by advocating for a peaceful divorce of these disunited States? It makes sense when half the country thinks of itself as “America” while the other half is disdained as “Dumbfuckistan”. The Blue States want it as much as the Red, the libertarians as much as the Eco-radicals. As the paragon of all that is modern, anti-white, and anti-life, America, not simply the Republican Party, must fail.
But from the ashes…
OSEverything in blockquote:
1. Continue to contribute to counter-currents regularly, giving early, and often. Usually give “X,” and you decide to put that spare folding money to a good cause? There it is. I have said before, with the greatest gratitude to the person who contributed the $10,000 matching grant, that the person who gave two dollars – probably all he or she had – is an example for us.
2. Develop the counter-cultural basis of a new nation, starting with you, starting where you are, starting five minutes from now. Use the Robinson Curriculum for home schooling your children, drop the excess weight, get out of debt – yes, file bankruptcy if that is best for you – and begin to develop the skills you will need in a dramatically imploded economy.
3. Define your spiritual purpose on the Earth, and turn your talents into capacities in the fulfillment of that purpose. No one can doubt that the likes of Jefferson and Adams were trained from before the laying of the foundations of the Heavens and the Earth for their Work. IT IS NO LESS TRUE FOR YOU OR I.
4. Develop a blog dealing with issues on your profession/occupation. Do book review, commentaries, and business plan solutions to what are business – i.e.; resource transformation – problems.
5. Participate – volunteer – with organizations in your field. Especially, if you are interested in the development of Leadership skills, find an organization whose goals support your Purpose. Work with them for free, pose no threat to anyone there – show up dressed a little better, act a bit more professional, and do this for two hours or so a day. A dirty little secret of the labor analysts is this: there are no new jobs net net net for college graduates, and many of them are working for FREE as “interns” to build a resume. They have been doing so for years. A lot of unemployment is being hidden by people “hiding out” in graduate school, with student loans all that are keeping them from homelessness. If that is your potential competition, how do you do better? By being where they are, with economically feasible plans for yourself, and your employer.
6. Get involved in local politics. They will teach you how to organize. You will gain substantial Insights as to how the world really works. This will be useful when the opportunities develop to form communities of interest, towns, and cities, as part of the Northwest Republic.
7. Don’t allow yourself to be seen as an explicit Racist. All other groups can do this. You can’t. Our advantage is excellence. De facto, an Elitist social system is only possible with our Race at work. Self-select for excellence. It acts as s filter that favors us.
8. The most segregated place in America is church on Sunday morning. It is also where men are hated, and white men are held in especially low esteem. If you start hearing sermons and lectures from the pulpit that put you down, leave. Don’t look back. Don’t come back. Consider meeting with the smarter members of Pagan orders about how you might work with them.
9. Focus Northwest. See yourself as a diplomatic observer from The Future, a much better Future, in the Northwest Republic.
10. Don’t Be A Victim.
As the ideas and suggestions above are implemented, opportunities and linkages will develop, particularly in new spiritual organizations. Your ideas are welcome. Preparing while we can will place us in a better place than the family in “Freedom’s Sons,” who are fleeing for their lives with the shirts on their backs.
Better, why not be ready FOR that “peaceful divorce,” as best you can. Should the US collapse along the lines of, say, uninhabitable cities, and the United States becoming Mexico with snow, where would you want to be, and what could you do to add value to the Northwest Republic, starting where you are, starting tonight?
Don’t forget the absolute importance of sending money to counter-currents regularly. Monthly is fine, and tonight would be fine.
An abandoned town can be rehabbed using modern building technology, and could become the Singapore of the Northwest Republic. Start with large outlying farmhouses, building bunkhouses, and, from there…
Good list. Thanks for that.
Lew:
If we accept the Northwest Republic as the temporal means towards the metapolitical end we seek – and that, in part, is why I cited an example from “Freedom’s Sons” – then the next step would be some sort of, well, counter-cultural organization.
The late Paul Weyrich recognized that institutional “conservatism” had, at all points, negated any hope for organic social conservatism to be even tolerated, much less supported, at the State level. He called for a de facto countercultural organization, and certain leading thoughts have developed to support this.
One of them was a masterful little essay called “The Integration of Theory and Practice.” It dealt, in good part, with issues that we have been discussing; how to develop and sustain an effective living foundation for a new Renaissance, and, in time, form the living foundation of the New Civilization.
Thanks to counter-currents, and Harold Covington, WNism is moving from the sad, pathetic, impotent, oppositional defiance that has been its historical hallmark.
All to the better.
Our real work begins comrades.
Gregory,I am really impressed that the first part of your plan worked so well; Why Romney Must Lose. I had no idea that the North American new Right was so influential, but it sure feels good – so what do we do now?
Romney may be cooked. My father is watching FAUX News downstairs, and I just heard that they called Ohio for Obama. Maybe it’s a bit of poetic justice for the man who wanted to “let Detroit go bankrupt.” Mr. Fancy Pants may well be taken down by the white working class of the beautiful Midwest. Now, if we could only get these same people to eventually abandon the Democratic Party.
So many of the ideas here are ones I share, and which I so rarely read expressed on white advocacy sites – or anywhere for that matter – that I’m giving an emphatic, big thumbs up. Thanks for this.
I just want to point out that the first part of this “right wing populist” movement – the part where the movement explicitly states that it is about putting white interests first – is the hardest. Johnson steps past it quickly to get to the good stuff, but the obstacle is unavoidable.
Whites aren’t currently allowed to publicly state and organize around their own interests. In fact, we’re not allowed to have racial awareness at all, or at least not to publicly state it as something we’re interested in beyond just attending ethnic food street fairs or getting celtic tattoos.
Perhaps white racial awareness will happen naturally as a consequence of whites slipping demographically into just one minority among a nation of minorities, but I think that even then anti-whites will continue to cow whites with “white guilt,” “white privilege” and all the other anti-white designer arguments and ideologies developed in academia over the past 50+ years.
So in the face of this ongoing repression, white racial awareness and organizing AS white people will continue to be the Big Problem, the big hurdle that we have to somehow get over, and the place from which we’re forced to start.
Merlin Miller stated that http://www.american3rdposition.com was to fill the role of a party to represent white interest because no other party will.
Now that Romney has lost, best of luck. Though the A3P’s platform was much more mainstream than what you recommend, it’s a pity it only got around 2000 votes in three states.
Racialist politics a must by 2016? We will have to see!
Watched Republican strategists start the blame game – starting with targeting Rush Limbaugh and Trump. The common theme (applauded by triumphant Democrats) is to embrace diversity. In other words, moving away from their only chance a victory by becoming the champion of White America. Or is there another possibility? Could they become the vehicle for Latino conquest – leaving the Democratic Party to Blacks and White Liberals? It would take some ideological flexibility, but they are capable of that. And no one would dare say it aloud for a long time giving them room to organize.
We’ll I’m a white Mid-Westerner with roots going back to the Puritan founders and I’m disappointed Romney didn’t win.
I just hope Obama keeps resisting Israeli calls to attack Iran.
This was one of, if not your best essay thus far. As my grandfather was fond of saying, “You have really put the hay down where the goats can get to it.” But Sandy poses the cogent question of, “Where do we go from here.” So, Greg, what is the endgame? What are we setting our sights on? Tell us, please.
I found this comment under an article on Red State by GOP shill Erick Erickson. The Obama win seems to have put some thoughts in this person’s head that probably wouldn’t be there if Romney had won.
Look, the botton line is that this country is a piece of ****. I’ve spent 24 months in Iraq defending what I thougtht was the country of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. But that counry is gone. We gave it away because of white guilt. We were guilty and ashamed of our success, and this is the result. I’m not here to blow smoke up your ass, but to speak the truth.
Since one of the posters mentioned the A3P platform, they should take up these ideas. Even though I support 99% of their existing platform its important to distinguish itself from being just another right wing third party or a pro-white version of the Constitution Party. Bill Johnson in my interview agrees about rejecting conservatism and their economics but their needs to be a stronger emphasis on third way economics. White Nationalist have a tendency to focus just on race and ignore economics and the growing class divide.
For instance, why not propose radically egalitarian tax policies?
Wasn’t tax policy under the Constitution originally radically egalitarian? Just duties and tariffs, which were to be uniform across the land. I think, off the top of my head. May be wrong.
That story about the elephant was awful.
The founders did not envision upper limits on earnings.
Great article.
Re: Vick –
A glance at the returns might lead one to believe that a regional separation is in store down the road. A final one this time. The subconscious racial awareness is already there. Any serious consideration of secession will automatically awaken thoughts of self interest. The cat will be out of the bag.
As always, Greg, I agree with most of your essay. But a couple of points:
“But if everybody who votes for Barack Obama dropped dead, most of my family would perish, but America would still survive.”
I disagree. That buys into the Republicans’ narrative that the only people who support Obama are those who pay no taxes. I know several people who are productive members of society and who are Democrats, and some losers who are Republicans. Also, I’m certain that some of the Occupy Wall Street-type people, who surely voted for Obama if they voted for any mainstream candidate, would be open to our ideas if they only became aware of them, since we are not really Left or Right according to the usual definitions. So don’t be so quick to discount the “Left” (which I put in quotes since I don’t regard the U.S. as having a real Left/Right dichotomy).
“One of the benefits of a Romney defeat is that it will hasten the day when the Republican Party perishes as an institution, and the destruction of the Republican Party is a good thing for whites in America.”
I envision no conceivable scenario in which the Republican Party will seek to represent White people again. Strategists are already attributing Romney’s failure in part to his failure to capture enough of the Hispanic vote. That means, expect more diversity in the message of the RP, not less. I also do not think the RP will break up anytime soon. After the 2004 election, some pundits were talking about “the death of the Democratic Party,” but then the Democrats swept up the 2006 and ’08 elections. That’s the thing about the American political process. Parties don’t really represent any ideology, apart from the concerns of hidden special interests, so when things don’t work out, they just reinvent themselves. As for your theory that the Republican party is being deliberately destroyed, I don’t see why that’s necessary. The reason the RP doesn’t represent the interests of Whites is because most Whites are ethnomasochistic, to a greater or lesser extent, at this point, and wouldn’t respond to the message, anyway. There’s no political capital for them to gain by appealing to Whites. And in American politics the only thing that counts are votes and money. There is neither to be had in promoting a seriously pro-White message anymore.
“Right-wing populism is the sweet spot in American politics, which is why the establishment fears, loathes, and co-opts it (when forced to).”
I agree with you that the emergence of a populist, genuinely radical Right-wing movement in the U.S. would be a good thing. I also agree in that it would only be good insofar as it would help to hasten the end of the present system. Both because of the changing demographics of the U.S., and because of the ethnomasochism of Whites, a pro-White populist movement is always going to be doomed to failure, because the fact is the majority of Americans, both White and non-White, do not share our concerns, or at least not strongly enough to support something that will be branded as “Nazi” and so on. Given the state of things today, and as long as every citizen has an equal vote, populism is a losing strategy for us. Some of us hold out hope that, after the “collapse,” in whatever form it takes, more Whites will be willing to support us. I share that hope, although in order for that to happen, the groundwork needs to be laid now. Organizations like Counter-Currents and Arktos are already working towards it, but we still have a long way to go before we can consider ourselves even remotely prepared for such a scenario.
1. John, sure, not everybody who votes Democrat is a parasite, but most of the parasites do vote Democrat, and if all the Republican voters dropped dead, the parasite/host ratio would be unsustainable.
2. There are votes to be had by appealing to white working class voters, and Sailer is right that the Republicans would have a secure lock on power if they would just appeal to that constituency. But they will not, because they are internally policed by people who would rather see the party destroyed and the country ruined than see white interests legitimated as a political issue. Those people are overwhelmingly Jews and plutocrats, and they own the Republican party (but not as much as they own the Democrats).
Hi Greg,
1. You may be right.
2. I don’t see how the Republicans could both appeal to White America and also continue to serve the interests of their financial backers. Speaking from the perspective of Michigan, for example, part of the reason that Romney’s message didn’t resonate with Whites here and in Ohio is because he had opposed the auto industry bailout. If there had been no bailout, thousands of White auto workers would now be out of a job. The Republicans can’t have it both ways. If the Republicans attempted to appeal to the White working class again, they would have to follow Ron Paul’s lead, and we already know how that turned out. They would lose a huge chunk of their backing. I also think you might be overestimating the racial sentiments of White America, but that’s difficult to gauge. My own feeling is that even most Whites are against us, at this point.
After reading Roissy’s comment below, I feel I should add, when I say that I think most Whites are against us, I don’t necessarily mean that they are all actively opposed to us (although there are plenty of those), but some of them are opposed to us because of their apathy, and likely unwilling to engage in a real political struggle on behalf of White interests.
Very nicely written. Had Romney won, I think we would be in a much worse spot.
Although Obama is acclimatizing us to the idea of minority leadership and miscegenation, I think its important that Romney and the Republicans be seen by whites as failures.
That said, I would be much more hopeful if the white people in America were not so apathetic and savagely degenerate.
We should be targeting the young. I think most people over 40 are a waste of time. They’ve invested psychologically too much in the present system to contribute towards renewal.
The idea that whites will wake when things get really bad is false. I know severely unemployed whites (who have children!) who sit and watch television, basically unperturbed by the state of social and economic decay.
Our hope is educating the youth—somehow, someway.
People who remember the Depression say that we haven’t seen anything yet. Sitting watching TV? When there is no power? No heat? No food? That will be the game changer if it comes.
Repubs would have to do more than just appeal to ‘whites’ in the current climate. A statistical breakdown would be helpful but many middle-class/working class whites would be happier voting for a socialist system. Upward mobility is no longer the dream – they are just hoping to have some job and benefits- so the libertarian/vulture capitalist/rich white strain has very little appeal.
GJ’s ideas sound excellent. Sometimes I think WN needs a Don Draper though. Sure, white guilt keeps some away but look at the standard forums. Virtually any White person that takes a look can be expected to have his religion, culture, ethnicity,politics insulted within 5 mins by some loudmouth with a narrow vision. Of course, CC is generally above this.
I remember the Anglo-Irish Catholic school I went to generally took a inclusive view of all European history alike. Pagan/catholic/reformers/Classic/Barbarian etc were all part of an ‘unfolding’. Without a similar methodology in regards to Europeans, it’s almost impossible to grow.
In fact, I am convinced that at the core of the Republican Party are people who actively wish to promote the destruction of the white race and the Republican Party. Why am I convinced that the Republicans are being subjected to a controlled demolition from the inside? Because if I were the enemy, that is exactly what I would do.
I was thinking about this… Definitely there is something more sinister about the Neoconservative movement than just wars for israel. They’re Trotskyists after all!
“Indeed, since Jews are more aware than any people of the conditions that promote or prevent genocide, one has to conclude that their promotion of policies conducive to the destruction of the white race is no accident but rather their conscious preference and aim.”
Greg,
This is the most painful truth that any awakening white must face. Early on in my own journey toward full-blown white nationalism, I would occasionally pose on internet message boards the question of why Jews need an ethnic homeland to be safe from genocide but whites are irrational, scared xenophobes if they have the same aspirations. Of course, I never received any satisfactory response to this question because there isn’t one. All I got was stone cold silence at best, or censorship at worst. This is absolutely chilling cynicism, even sociopathy, on the part of Jews, and I have not been the same since I became aware of it.
“Why not adopt a Social Credit economy and simply abolish usury? Why not run on a platform of complete debt repudiation?”
Greg, this is key. I’d like to discuss this with you in more detail, perhaps in private. Appealing to déracinés wallets is definitely a winning strategy and most likely our last hope. However, I don’t think you can simply repudiate the debt. For one thing, the bankers will have you shot. But there is a way to do this and I think I know what it is….
Odd that the banks have not had Iceland invaded.
Fair point. But with a population of c. 350k Iceland can be dealt with leniently without any undue problematics. Do you think that an “Icelandic” strategy in the US could be safely overlooked by the Big Boys?
Do the Big Boys have a nuclear deterrent?
Partisan warfare from bankers can be squelched with anti-partisan reprisals.
Hi,
“Half the money raised by Republicans comes from Jews (75% for Democrats)…” Can you provide a source for this please?
“…and a large percentage of the rest comes from wealthy non-Jews (an even higher percentage for the Democrats).” Correct me if I’m wrong but this part of the statement doesn’t seem to add up with the first part?
“Half the money raised by Republicans comes from Jews (75% for Democrats)…” Can you provide a source for this please?
These two links are a good starting place. Though I’ve included pull quotes for the following links, both are worth reading in their entirety, and both lead to other sources, if you’re interested in researching. Keep in mind that Jewish monetary support for certain political ends, like David Gelbaum’s $100 million bribe to the Sierra Club to never discuss immigration ever again in any capacity – which they accepted – do not show up in RNC/ DNC ledgers. Ditto magazines, think tanks, newspapers, usw. We ourselves would need a huge amount of money and a gifted full time staff just to fully investigate Jewish monetary machinations in American politics.
http://mondoweiss.net/2007/12/oy-my-people-ar.html
I sense that Jewish entrepreneurialism is the engine of the American economy. The Republican Party is now losing the money race to the Democratic Party, according to the Times, and meantime the Washington Post reported some years ago that more than half of Democratic presidential giving is coming from Jews, while Steve Rabinowitz, Clinton friend, told me this year that if anyone did a study of how much Dem money comes from Jews, it would fuel conspiracy theories… We helped invent the service and information economy. We’re all over the hedge funds that have altered the flows of capital around the world, we are all over the media. I know this is impressionistic–and I live in New York–but we’re everywhere. I pick up my wife at the airport and a guy is wearing a Bloomberg School sweatshirt. Steve Walt has the Belfer chair at Harvard, Niall Ferguson (who lectured at Yivo about Jews and Money) has the Tisch chair there. I lost this blog at the Observer because the paper was bought by a conservative Jew. Sheldon Adelson is the biggest supporter of the new Republican pro-Iraq war group Freedom’s Watch, while Steve Grossman is one of the leading fundraisers for Hillary in New England, and Grossman attacks Desmond Tutu for speaking about Palestinian suffering; and when the political establishment/Hillary push ahead to confront Iran, Sy Hersh says it’s about “Jewish money.” I go to a concert at the beautiful Paramount in Peekskill, N.Y., and the chairman of the Paramount board is a guy named Rubin. At times it seems like Jewish money is the only game in town. Like when Obama folded, sickeningly, on a Walt-and-Mearsheimer book ad on his website. Or when the New York Theatre Workshop folded, grotesquely, on the Rachel Corrie play. The thinktanks in Washington–forget about it. Two years back I heard that Cato scholars were being told to watch what they said about Israel, because of funding concerns.
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/10/neocons-and-the-incredible-jewish-ethnic-infrastructure/
Whereas Saban funds ultra-Zionism from the political left, the financial angel of the neocons is Bruce Kovner, a New York hedge fund billionaire who “over two decades, has underwritten the infrastructure the neocons have used to achieve their current prominence.” Kovner funds the American Enterprise Institute, the Manhattan Institute, and the New York Sun. He was also a major backer of President George W. Bush: “when George Bush’s chestnuts were in the fire [over the Iraq war], Kovner helped to pull them out. He wrote checks for $110,000 to a 527 called Softer Voices that was aimed at ‘security moms’ in swing states. Softer Voices is led by, among others, the writer Midge Decter, the wife of Norman Podhoretz, and Nina Rosenwald, a force in the pro-Israel lobby. Kovner was its largest financial backer.” (Nevertheless, as Philip Weiss notes, “the biggest money game in town on the Republican side is Sheldon Adelson, a Zionist Jew, who got engaged in 2000 with the specific aim of nullifying the ‘peace process.’”)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_lobby_in_the_United_States#Campaign_donations
J.J. Goldberg wrote in his 1994 book Jewish Power that 45% of the Democratic Party’s fundraising and 25% of that for the Republican Party came from Jewish-funded Political Action Committees.[47] Richard Cohen, a columnist for the Washington Post, updated those figures in 2006 citing figures of 60% and 35% respectively for the Democratic and Republican Parties. According to the Washington Post, Democratic presidential candidates depend on Jewish sources for 60% of money from private sources.[48]
Thanks. That’s certainly clear-cut.
How big of a disciplined party is needed to get 51% of the vote?
I do think that a distinctive 3rd party is the only way, and one of the two national partys must go.
I think that the old elephant needs a shot between the eyes with an H&H .400 nitro express.
Get the paulists to believe that the individual freedoms only come when there are enough cops to keep out hostile foreign nationals, catch white collar crooks, and political subversives (race baiters, internationlaists, monopoly finnance). The youth wing of the nationalist party must be huge to get the word out. The only way to keep america is to take over the government.
I think that the boomers are pretty much a lost cause. Too much woodstockism.
Dont forget about this http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/11/Teachers-flock-to-Northwestern-University-Marxist-Conference-journalist-booted
What do you mean, “We do not think of ourselves as citizens of the United States or Canada or any existing white regime.” Maybe YOU don’t think of yourself as one, but I am certain most of us hold at least some degree of patriotism to our country.
First of all, there is no way to redistribute the North American white population into a new territory. That’s population redistribution – the kind of shit that Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union did.
Secondly, regional cultures are just as important as the white civilisation as a whole. I am a Prairie-Canadian, for example. Other people are white southerners, others white New Englanders, etc. Take away the regionality, and you take away part of the culture as a whole.
Thirdly, the small-r republican system is generally inferior to the monarchist system. I am a proud member of the Monarchist League of Canada, and I will fight to the death to preserve the Commonwealth.
Fourth, for the love of God, stop talking about Jews as though they are one cohesive community with one common frame of mind. There are Jewish monsters like Henry Morgentaler, and there are Jewish heroes like Ezra Levant.
Fifth, the Golden Dawn is a party of violent fascists; they are not a model to be emulated. Follow good parties like the British National Party.
Sixth, if you are a U.S. citizen, I encourage you to join the Third Position Party. This is the only party that will realistically represent European-American interests.
Good evening all
Another one for the pillory!
Apparently, we are finally being taken seriously as one of the few Adult voices of White nationalism. All the better, and all the more reason to contribute to counter-currents. Today would be fine.
Tono Fonseca in blockquote:
Well, they hold “at least some degree of patriotism for our country” – nice minimilization, that – but is it enough to matter? Hongcouver calls a lot of the shots of the Candian Far West, like it or not. How much “patriotism” can you expect from people who can buy citizenship for, what was it, $75,000, something like that? The common cultural foundation of effective “patriotism” is subverted when citizenship is available to the highest bidder, even if he is (1) from an alien Culture, and (2) supports the importing of that Culture, and, implicitly, its cultural dominance in the new order of their new host nation.
Remember, true “citizenship” is inherently organic, and is derived from family, and your extended family, the nation as the living foundation of the nation-state. What concerns has Hongcouver for the Maritimes, or even the West, from Alberta to Manitoba?
None.
In fact, it happens in microcosm daily, with the creation of suburbia, and the exurbs. It happens in the organic macrocosm when White people leave Southern California looking like a latter-day Grapes of Wrath, with all of their possessions on their car and trailer, heading North with all due speed, literally fleeing for their lives.
The Northwest Republic already has a substantial organic immigrant population. All they need is to Awaken to the explicit realization of the implicit reason they left what could not work, trying desperately to find a new life that could.
If they succeed, we succeed.
The regional component is gradually being subsumed into the new Culture-Whole, in the names of “tolerance” and “inclusion.” If memory serves, CBC TV has a show called “Little Mosque on the Prairie.” How important can the Culture of The West be when the (Crown corporation!) public broadcaster openly displays support for a conflict against the historic Culture?
Perhaps some parts of the “regionality” SHOULD be removed, to insure the Culture-Whole remains, well, whole.
Over the long haul. the best system is a Constitutional monarchy with bicameral legislatures, formed from a common Culture, supporting the Race as its First Imperative.
Shame you don’t have a system like that.
Worse, the monarchy you support don’t seem too busy “supporting” you and your extended Family, your organic nation. Their leadership – and I use that term very loosely – has led to London becoming Londonistan, the new capital of East Asia, where the White families that built the country – Hell, the Empire! – flee for their lives from street gangs that support ethnic pride for their ethnicity, while hunting White people for fun and profit.
You say you “will fight to the death to support the Commonwealth.” I’m certain the Windsors appreciate that. Do you think they will fight to the death to support you, and your Family?
No.
Of course not.
You aren’t even a “citizen.” You are a “subject” of the Crown, and you are “subject” to THEIR wishes. Do you really think they care in the least about yours? Ask the young men who died on the first day at the Somme, and ask their officers who were recalled and hung for not succeeding in suicide attacks. Nothing has changed for the better in the century since.
The Jewish Community – the Jewish RACE – IS remarkably “cohesive” on the fundamentals of how they operate. They might disagree on tactics, and even strategy, but grand strategy is commonly agreed upon by all. It is race War, the Jewish Race against all, fought on all levels, at all times, in a sort of Fourth Generation Warfare that has been going on for hundreds of generations.
To the extent the Golden Dawn meets the needs of the people the Government fails to meet, they are models to be emulated. Soup kitchens, emergency relief, and security on the street level, are all examples of critically necessary public functions the Golden Dawn meets.
And, if your idea of a “good party” is the British National Party – wait – that actually makes sense. You see, as the BNP softly fails into impotence, on their way to the dust bin of history, I can see why they would be the model you would want us to emulate. They are “good for you, and not so good, for us.
Now, certain Irish organizations, despite how remarkably inept they have been in the use of force, have secured political effectiveness for themselves far beyond what the BNP could imagine. Lessons present themselves, whether it is the example of Adams in Stormont, or Griffin being gelded and eviscerated on Question Time.
Let’s learn the lessons.
3AP has certain very admired people associated with it. Yet, you want “party that will realistically represent European-American interests.”
Far better than any controlled party would be a new nation, an implicitly ethnocentric nation, actively supporting, and supported by, a State that places the interests of the Race first. Something like, say, a Northwest Republic,
This worked for the Jews.
It will certainly work for us.
A good evening, perhaps leading to the Golden Dawn of a new, better day.
Tono Fonseca in blockquote:
The regional cultures are useful only insofar as they are Western Civilization.
Yet, consider the Culture-Whole as something that ONLY the White Race can manifest as the outwork of Western Civilization. Can one disappear, become (*ahem*) “melded” out of existence, as the White Race is?
To see what is about to disappear, look for the inappropriate extreme acts.
You say you are Prairie-Canadian. The example of The west versus Francophone Canada will be illustrative.
Remember when Trudeau gave all manner of backdoor support to Francophone Canada, and how that developed into an Institution in Ottawa? Massive, de facto, Affirmative Action against the rest of Canada led to parties and alliances (PQ/BQ) developing at the economic expense of The West. Remember how the Prairie farmers had to sell to the Wheat Pool, and were forbidden to develop upstream, value-added, facilities? Remember how the hard workers of The West had to subsidize the lotus eaters of Francophone Caada, which even mandated a second language for all transactions?
After a while, Francophone Canada felt so entitled to these unearned benefits, they would softly speak of secession, if they were cut off from the benefits paid for by the rest of Canada – from Ontario to Yellowknife, if you will.
Then, Preston Manning – the best statesman to come from The West, ever – called their bluff. Remember how Manning told them I repeat TOLD THEM they were free to leave after a secession vote, where they would be assigned their share of the Canadian national debt, and would receive a bill from Ottawa for national defense?
One and all remember watching the election on CBC, and all remember the Visual Basic band at the bottom of the CBC screen. Literally under the watchful eye of Peter Mansbridge, the band hovered all night between 50.5-49.5, and 49.5-50.5. One and all also remember how, in the last half-hour, Hongcover cast THEIR vote, as the Canadian dollar began to plummet precipitously. Hongcouver essentially scared the children playing with matches, in a room full of gasoline. Preston Manning was vindicated, and the Adults decided to stay in the Federation.
Politics at this level takes place over generations. It took how many years for Trudeau to build the artificial support system THAT MADE THE PC/BQ POSSIBLE. Removed of this life support, they have diminished to their natural state.
I mentioned how politics at this level takes place over generations. Note that Clever Chretien placed the issue before the Canadian Supreme Court. They ruled – and thus, the Canadian Executive now has the power of law on his side – that even if the strongest claims of Francophone Canadian sovereignty were true, they would only apply to a few blocks in the city, and some minor islands.
(Hongcover wants the economic power of Quebec available for all of Canada. Hydropower is an invaluable. clean energy export. There are other resources that matter, as well, and they are controlled by parties who do not want new arrangements to unfold.)
Regional Cultures – subcultures, actually – have their place. To the extent that they work against the Culture-Whole, for whatever reason, they must do a better job of carrying Civilization forward, or they will pass into the dustbin of history, whether it is Paris as the Second Capital of Algeria, or Francophone Canada, now a playground for tourists, and not remotely an effective political force, even in Canada.
There are lessons in this for us, as well.
A quick Northwest Republic note might be in order here. Again, the Insight of Harold Covington comes to the fore. The Canadian West has more in common with us, than they do the rest of Canada. They are China’s natural resource base. They can be ours, as well.
A fantastic article that nails the Republi-CON Party for what it is, PHONY AND DISASTROUS FOR EUROPEAN-AMERICANS AND THEIR CONCERNS. (Yes, European-Americans happen to have concerns about their rights, like any other group the left always babbles on about)
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Edit your comment