1,641 words
Tucker Carlson Interviews Nick Fuentes
The biggest news in Nationalism This Week is that Tucker Carlson interviewed Nick Fuentes. Everyone knows that I think that Fuentes is a slimy, unprincipled opportunist who is bad for white identity politics because (1) he isn’t white, and (2) his only (apparent) absolute is Catholicism.
Fuentes is a Mexican Catholic reactionary, not a white advocate. And, as I pointed out more than a decade ago, reactionary Catholicism is not a vehicle for white identity politics. The best it can do is Latin masses for the brown people who are replacing us. This is borne out by Fuentes’ increasingly brown audience.
That said, the Fuentes interview is largely good for white identity politics, despite the fact that Fuentes cucked on every important identitarian issue, as David Zsutty has already pointed out. Seriously, when Tucker said things like “God created only individuals, not groups,” that was an engraved invitation to defend basic race realism, and Fuentes decided to play it safe. Now that Charlie Kirk is dead, he is running toward the mainstream thinking he can pick up Kirk’s audience.
There are at least three reasons why this interview is good for white identity politics.
First, it is a huge Overton window shift. If Tucker can platform Nick Fuentes, what’s to stop him from platforming me or Jared Taylor or Kevin MacDonald? At this point, nothing.
Second, although Fuentes is bad on race and identity, he’s very good on the Jewish question, which is now being widely discussed because his appearance has triggered a public meltdown by Jewish advocates and apologists.
As an aside, I think that Tucker’s decision to platform Fuentes is a master stroke. Fuentes has been getting a “strange new respect” from the mainstream, including the New York Times. The Times wanted to promote him because he is anti-Trump and anti-Vance. But his new respectability began with his attacks on Tucker Carlson as a “fed.” Tucker is the number one enemy of Right-wing Jews like Laura Loomer and Mark Levin because of his critical attitude toward Israel and Zionist power in American politics. Thus the most plausible explanation for mainstreaming Fuentes is to harm Tucker.
By platforming Fuentes, however, Tucker has co-opted Fuentes, who has now dropped the “fed” accusation and is pretending to be pro-Trump. More importantly, by interviewing Fuentes, Tucker has thrust the question of Jewish control of American politics center-stage, and now it has more credibility because Jews and their allies spent their own capital mainstreaming Fuentes. That was clever of them but not too smart.
Third, by platforming Fuentes, Tucker now has the whole establishment bent on attacking and discrediting Fuentes. There’s a mountain of dirt for them to work with, ably assembled by such researchers as Chris Brunet. If Tucker wanted to discredit Fuentes on his own, he would not have had a fraction of the help or reach as the army of critics he has now conjured up.
This creates another Overton window shift, making it more likely for Fuentes’ critics on the Right like Chris Brunet and Jaden McNeil to be platformed. Frankly, discrediting an interloper like Fuentes can only be good for white identity politics, and plenty of people on the real Right have all the necessary receipts.
This may be as close to the sun as Nick ever flies.
Well played, Tucker. Well played. I hope you are kicking back, smoking a stogie, and beaming with satisfaction.
Sean Grayson Did Nothing Wrong
On July 6, 2024, Sonya Massey, a black woman having a mental health crisis, called the police in Woodside Township near Springfield, Illinois. When Deputy Sean Grayson and his partner showed up, Massey acted mentally confused and answered questions evasively. Then she tried to hurl a pot of boiling water on Grayson, after which Grayson shot her dead.
On July 17, 2024, Grayson was indicted on charges of first-degree murder. On October 29, 2025, after two days of deliberations, a jury composed mostly of White women, convicted Grayson of second-degree murder.
This is obviously another racially charged, anti-white/pro-black political indictment and conviction. Sean Grayson did nothing wrong. Let’s hope this travesty of justice is widely reported and that Grayson gets justice. Time to start chimping. Be sure to read Jim Goad’s excellent article on this topic, which recounts the history and memes surrounding black women using boiling liquids as an assault weapon.
EBT for All Plus Slurs
Ex-libertarian populists always need to be on guard against their inner CATO Institute. Whenever a political issue comes up, ask yourself, “What would Paul Ryan do?” then do the opposite. A case in point is the current discussion of the impending shutdown of EBT (previously know as “food stamps”) as part of the ongoing government shutdown. On such questions, I like to ask myself what Matt Parrott would do, then act accordingly.
Matt argues that the white identitarian message should be simple: the Democrats are shutting down one of their much-vaunted social welfare programs for poor Americans because they are more interested in giving social welfare to illegal aliens. We stand for putting Americans first.
Sean McCarthy once summed up this kind of national populism as “Medicare for all plus slurs,” meaning an interventionist state plus free speech about racial realities. I am for EBT for the truly needy, plus free speech about the racial realities of EBT usage.
Unfortunately, once you begin that conversation, the racial realities of EBT are quite shocking. It isn’t exactly an “America first” program. Rob Finnerty of Newsmax reported that in addition to high numbers of legal immigrants collecting food stamps (45% for Afghanis, 42% of Somalis) 59% of illegal immigrants are on federal food stamps.
Officially, illegal immigrants are not supposed to receive federal food stamps. But being in a “mixed household” is an easy work around, especially with birthright citizenship. This is, of course, in addition to various state and private food giveaway programs, which don’t require citizenship or legal residency.
For example, the New York Post reported in 2013 that “NYC welfare food is shipped in barrels to the Dominican Republic—then sold on the black market.” I agree with a rising chorus that it would be interesting to see by how much foreign remittances would drop if the EBT doesn’t flow on November 1.
The Democrats used to say that we had to pass bills to find out what’s in them. Now, we can end or threaten to end programs like USAID and EBT to make the Democrats squeal about how bad they actually are.
I am betting that, just as we can deport tens of millions of migrants before encountering even one “hard case,” we can cut off tens of millions of EBT users without endangering anyone who is “truly needy.” Funny how the people whining the loudest about losing their EBT are more often obese than undernourished.
We Need to Ice Domestic Terrorists
On October 4, ten vehicles boxed in ICE agents who were working in Chicago. One of the vehicles rammed an ICE vehicle, whose driver promptly shot the other driver in self-defense. The assailant was later apprehended at a hospital after seeking treatment. One of the other drivers of assault vehicles was also arrested.
There’s a huge problem here. There were ten assault vehicles, so there were ten drivers, plus possible passengers. But only two were arrested, one at a hospital. All ten drivers and any passengers aiding and abetting them should have been arrested and prosecuted to the full extent of the law. This is domestic terrorism and should be treated as such.
The lack of consequences thus far for domestic terrorism is only encouraging more of it. The Department of Homeland Security reports that on October 23 in Chicago, “75-100 rioters surrounded law enforcement who set up a perimeter after agents were boxed in by a large box truck. Rioters then shot at agents with commercial artillery shell fireworks.” They could just as well have opened up with machine guns.
DHS has provided five minutes of footage of the incident here with ample hood profanity and “Halo” music. (David Zsutty informs me that Halo is a video game franchise recently used to promote mass deportations.) The footage clearly debunks liberal whining about how the head of the Border Patrol, Gregory Bovino, tear gassed a swarming crowd that was threatening the agents.
Again, it is dismaying that the perpetrators were not subjected to mass, J6-style arrests and prosecuted for domestic terrorism.
But there is some hope. This week, twelve ICE office chiefs were reassigned and replaced with seasoned Border Patrol agents because the Trump administration wants deportations to get much more aggressive.
Let’s hope that this will include arresting domestic terrorists instead of letting them slip away.
Iryna’s Azure
In September, white people were shocked by the savage murder of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska by a vacant, soulless black career criminal named “Decarlos” Brown while riding a train in North Carolina. Equally shocking was the indifference of the other black occupants of the train car. Obviously, white lives don’t matter to them.
Entomologist Harry Pavulaan was moved by Iryna’s death to name a butterfly species Celastrina iryna (Iryna’s Azure) in her honor. Pavulaan is the president of The Taxonomic Report which studies butterflies and moths. Another entomologist, Ronald Gatrelle, originally discovered the species in 1985 in South Carolina but didn’t name it. After Gatrelle died, Pavulaan inherited his collection and confirmed that the Iryna’s Azure was a separate species in 2018 and 2019.
Iryna’s Azure is a small butterfly with light-blue wings on the upper side and sometimes a subtle violet-blue tint. It lives on the coastal plain of Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, and South Carolina. It flies mostly in April but has been collected throughout spring and summer. You can read Pavulaan’s full report here for more details.
I propose naming the next species of cockroach to be discovered after Decarlos Brown.
Happy Halloween from Counter-Currents everyone!
96 comments
“And, as I pointed out more than a decade ago, reactionary Catholicism is not a vehicle for white identity politics. The best it can do is Latin masses for the brown people who are replacing us. ”
I won’t comment on the overall value of reactionary Catholicism. But I speak from long experience going to a Latin mass, one increasingly full of the brown people that are replacing us. It’s pretty depressing. Despite the line that 11 o’clock Sunday morning is the most segregated hour of the week, it was far and away the most diverse hour of my week.
Depressing is also seeing half the Protestant churches in your small Southern hometown–including the church you grew up in–become inglesias. Not 40 years ago, they were packed with white people. That’s when you know shit has gotten real.
Your church and my church are competing for these guys, meanwhile you and I both probably want them all deported.
I had the strange experience of seeing a Spanish-language river baptism of a bunch of Mexicans while I was hiking in a state park in Appalachia.
When Tucker platforms Anglin we got somethin!
This is the problem I have with the internal fighting on the right. Nobody has everything I want either. Anglin loves Nick Fuentes, no? Anglin sort of claimed to be a Nick whisperer. He loves rap and thought that rapper Nick hung around would be a great president. So what’s the threshold for saying this guys too terrible in this or that area for me to appreciate? Nicks soft on race , but he’s better than most no?
as a non professional white advocate it’s annoying.
Anglin seems to be critical of Fuentes. www.dailystormer.in
Seems like Greg J. wrote somewhere that rap is the soundtrack of hell. That’s exactly right. Anyone who worships jigs or their pathological culture is a hard no.
Guillaume Faye wrote that rap had gone the way of disco. Now it’s all gender fluid, gay, and doink-brain retarded once you’ve hit the bottom with drunk, traphouse, mumble, and drill there’s nowhere else to go. It’s over. AI could replace every one of them.
Honestly, that would be a bad thing.
Oh my God heaven forbid, please no.
any way to post a better link to the Chris burnet article? I’ve been wanting to find out about the accusations but never seen anything beyond just “he’s gay” . Is the burnet thing behind a paywall?
it’s also good to recall the southern browns. Indians have been (rightly ) receiving so much attention but my area is filled with Aztecs etc.
Fuentes did mention he wants a white co again; but you guys know more about this stuff than I do. I don’t know how his brown audience deals with the white stuff, but I don’t listen too him that much so I don’t know everything he says. Zman saw him as a positive force , except after the rapper thing he got sort of sick of him; but Zman was never a Jew guy either.
so I see the interview as positive all around, my little experience with Fuentes is that he is a soft interviewer but then has another face on his show which I saw just as a tactic.
its possible that Tucker is setting him up. If there is overwhelming evidence of serious sex stuff Tucker can deny he knew (his dad wasn’t in the cia after all ).
glad you took this up cause it is kinda a big deal. Taylor is not a Jew guy, but he’s good on race; Emj is terrible on race (much worse than Nick) but good on the Jew stuff.
I guess my overall question would be isn’t this interview anns Nick in general a good step, if we’re not “purity spiraling” as the kids say?
Are you Jaye Ryan? The punctuation, noncapitalization, and weird spaces are his trademark. But your name also reminds me of a great commenter from 3 or 4 years ago, called Eeh-yah! or something like that. He pissed off the site owners and commenters of every blog or site in “our thing.” I liked him a lot and wish he was here now. He even went on the Nicholas Stix site as one of the very few non-anonymous commenters there (though Eeyah must still be a fake name–right?).
No, I’m a low tier commenter. I kinda suck. I’m just happy to be here!
Fuentes says some good things about the JQ and knows how to present it in a way audiences find entertaining. I agree with his Machiavellian perspective on crushing the left. But these good things are almost always saddled with bizarre niche issues that alienate normal people. The Catholic integralist angle has always been a nonstarter in the US because only 20% of Americans are Catholic and a huge part of that percentage is mestizo (in an unambiguous way, not in the tactical way employed by Fuentes). Frankly, that whole angle feels like a LARP. It also often forces Fuentes into pointless conflict, as he goes apoplectic when someone notes that the Pope and basically every Catholic institution are openly working for white dispossession throughout the world. He spergs out frequently in defense of whatever libtard the Vatican currently pretends has some special relationship with God.
Fuentes always thinks himself the smartest person in any room, but his track record isn’t great from a tactical perspective. He often expresses explicit hatred for possible allies – anyone else near the movement, white southerners, Europeans, white women, Protestants, his own audience, etc. – while embracing natural enemies like rappers. His choice of friends is quite strange too, probably most catastrophically by embracing Milo at a point that everyone already knew the issues there.
He prominently supported Stop the Steal and was present with followers in DC on January 6th. Then he decided he couldn’t support Trump in 2024 due to his support of Israel, even though that had been abundantly obvious with Trump since the moment he started his campaign in 2015. Trump’s campaign was markedly worse on every issue in 2020 than 2024, so it’s illogical to go the mat for him in 2020 but shun him in 2024.
Fuentes has survived all these missteps and continued to grow in large part because of media exposure. Right from the beginning he was on MTV, he has this coverage from the NYT, he gets to meet with Trump, now Tucker, on and on. He was able to retain his YouTube channel and Twitter longer than pretty much anyone, even as he openly joked about the Holocaust. Of course, the media coverage of him is always negative, but it also can’t help mentioning how influential and popular he is, so it acts as a sort of advertising. I’ve found that to be very curious. There’s a similar sort of Streisand Effect that the media has created around Alex Jones and Andrew Tate, both of whom are Fuentes aligned.
Well said
Fuentes is a bizarre character. He is physically extremely oddly built, a dwarf with a hunchback. He has strange physical mannerisms and habits. But I am surprised that Greg denies that Fuentes is white. Even if we stick to the one-drop rule, Fuentes would belong to the lightest type of Mexican Creoles, whom no one has ever doubted were essentially white, albeit with a distant admixture of indigenous genes. Fuentes appears whiter than many Italian Americans and Ashkenazi Jews in the US.
He’s 20% non-white and uses that whenever it is to his advantage. Why do you grant him an identity that he doesn’t have and only uses as a mask?
Race is an objective biological category. His own “sense of identity” cannot change his belonging to the white race. Anti-white liberals who declare themselves “race traitors” are still objectively white. In Fuentes’ case, the decisive factor is whether his 20% of genes come from Native Americans/ Mestizzos/ Caphuzos or only from Hispanic Creoles (descendants of white Iberian Peninsula settlers in Latin America). Based on his appearance, I would guess the latter.
His non-white genes are Amerindian and African.
All white Hispanics claim this about themselves. In Latin America today, it is unacceptable for a descendant of Europeans to say that they have no people of color among their ancestors. In fact, a large proportion of Creoles are whiter than they admit. Often they have little Spanish or Portuguese blood, but are rather descendants of Italians, French, but also Germans, Irish, Poles, and other Europeans, a surprising number of whom came to South America from the end of the 19th century (today this is almost forgotten).
Fuentes looks White because his mother is a race traitor. His White appearance has nothing to do with his “Iberian peninsula father” and everything to do with his White mother. I bet his father looks like your average Aztec midget using a leaf blower to move snow. My own sister in law let a blacker than black Puerto Rican “SPANISH LATIN” man knock her up and the kid looks like Fuentes. The European genes mogged the Arawak genes in this case. One day people like you will tell him his father is a descendant from the Iberian peninsula and that is why he looks the way he does.
This is why the one drop racial hygiene policy is essential. People can’t try to pull of these elaborate contortions to destroy our cause if we stick to that.
New Flyer: October 31, 2025 Fuentes looks White because his mother is a race traitor. His White appearance has nothing to do with his “Iberian peninsula father” and everything to do with his White mother… This is why the one drop racial hygiene policy is essential. People can’t try to pull of these elaborate contortions to destroy our cause if we stick to that.
—
Thank you, NF. We must not compromise on the race issue. No 20-drop exception for a poseur like Fuentes because he has dumb white [lower case] followers on social media. NA has a wonderful free, printable flier that says it all: Commit a Revolutionary Act: Have a White Child Visit Natall.com –Natall.comrevolutionary_act01Y.-scaled.jpg (1707×2560)
The piece introducing the new flier three years ago: “Becoming Revolutionary” at nationalvanguard.org
… Here’s the lesson: White people must have their own territories again. White people must have racially-conscious White leadership again. White people must have their own media and educational institutions again. White people must have their own military forces again. Or all is lost.
The bad decisions that led us to give up all of those things were largely made in the living memory of millions of us who are still alive. They were all “moral” decisions. They were all decisions that leveraged the average White man’s Christian morals against him. They were all decisions framed as being “fair” and “good” to non-Whites. They were all decisions pushed and promoted by the Jewish minority and the mass media they control. In sum, they were all fatal.
Is it too late to reverse these bad decisions? Is it too late to save our race? Well, it is too late for those Whites who have fully committed to the anti-White corporate world, to the anti-White churches, to the anti-White regime in Washington, and to the anti-White inverted morality espoused by them all. Their children will be mind-raped and physically raped. Their children will be groomed for homosexual and pedophilic abuse. Their children will be groomed for racial mixture. Their children will be sterilized with chemicals and knives. They will go extinct in just a few generations.
But not all Whites are going quietly into the night of racial death. They are the healthiest Whites, the most perceptive and far-seeing Whites. They are the Whites with the soundest instincts. They are the Whites who care most passionately for the future lives of their children, and their children’s children, and so on into infinity. They will make a new society and a new people — stronger than any White society that has come before; more dedicated to racial survival and progress than any White nation in history; absolutely committed to a new morality and a new social paradigm in which the survival and upward evolutionary progress of our race are the central, unassailable, and eternal values that can never be changed.…
I’m not sure all of these things will happen….but I sure like the way you think.
[b]EDIT:[/b] An afterthought. The idea of Nick Fuentes “flying high” would be like his being the tallest midget in a room full of midgets.
sluggo: February 5, 2026 I’m not sure all of these things will happen….but I sure like the way you think.
—
You can’t be sure of everything that is to come, Sluggo. Like Mr. Hitler said, “Nothing is certain.”
However, if you believe our race is worth preserving you realize it will require fighting for it, beginning with separating from the Judaized white herd and from non-Whites.
I’ve always had good racial instincts but didn’t act on them until 40 years ago when I first got seriously involved in racial politics, and most seriously after meeting and working with Dr. William Pierce 35 years ago. Study Pierce’s teachings and you are likely to soon be thinking as I and others do. Read this and decide if you can support the ideology and program that Pierce devised: What is the National Alliance? | National Alliance
I’ll step carefully into the discussion, first with the disclaimer that I don’t have strong feelings about him since I haven’t been following him in much depth. That said, his DNA results (if I remember correctly) would suggest an Indian great grandparent (no doubt Aztec, Mayan, chichimeca, or kindred peoples) and an African great great grandparent and perhaps a trace of Moorish influence, or an admixture that adds up to the same. Although I’m more Nordicist than I really should be, normally I wouldn’t consider it to be such a big deal if someone is 1/8 “Cherokee princess”. In Nick’s case, though, it gets a bit more iffy with the addition of an African in the woodpile. The odd physiognomy you mention, as well as the odd behavior our esteemed editor mentions frequently, at least raises the possibility of mattoid characteristics.
Then there’s the question of where his heart really is. Strategically self-declaring as one thing or another naturally does raise a few questions. Ideologically, his primary focus seems to be Catholic theocracy, if my understanding is correct. I have nothing against Catholics, though Papal ultramontanism just isn’t my thing. Anyway, if he identifies as civic nationalist rather than pro-White, I’ll take his word for it. If he were running in an election against Laura Loomer, she’d get my vote – yeah, I know, but at least we know where she’s coming from.
In summation, I’m not going to nit-pick the ancestry of someone who’s being helpful, or put down non-Whites who have something positive to say, but all this depends on two things. First, they need to stay on-message. Second, they need to be one of us to be accepted as a thought leader.
Race for me is a foundational principle. Our race is under threat, and any political ideology, policy, or commentator is our friend or enemy depending on whether he/she/it is good for whites or bad for whites.
I will grant that there are white people who are our enemies, and non-whites and off-whites who are our friends. So what is essential for being our political friends/enemies is not their DNA but their attitudes toward whites. (Marriage is another issue, obviously.)
But Fuentes isn’t an off-white ally of White Nationalism, because white racial preservation is not an absolute for him. For Fuentes, racial identity is simply a tool, to be opportunistically used and discarded depending on the circumstances. That means that his real absolutes lie elsewhere: professedly in Catholicism but in reality just his own ego gratification.
I respect Fuentes for many reasons, one being he was seriously doxed by the (Js, Antifa, SPLC, Conservative Inc) and he actually had a real assassination attempt on his life. So by AH’s standard, he’s making the right enemies and showing courage. I’ve been doxed – it sucks. I’ve also doxed some deserving bad/traitor ha Whites and yes, doxing works – in contrast same old, same Conservative tactics (“Write your Congressman”, “run some no shot old Constitutionalist, Libertarian like Ron Paul for President , stockpile military guns that aren’t practical and are never used, pass out Hillsdale college pamphlets of the US Constitution etc), Conservative tactics haven’t worked, they don’t work (See JL Rockwell’s chapter “50 Years of Failure” in WP).
Hey Greg Johnson and Will Williams – has anyone done a well researched, well written update of Dr. Pierce’s “Who Rules American” (Who owns and runs the media) since the early 1990s.
There have been lots of important updates to this – examples of White Gentiles and other just commenting on Jewish control of the US Media and then getting fired/purged (such as the White hispanic guy on CNN Rick Sanchez who was fired for saying “yeah there are a lot of Jews at CNN).
Along with an updated, visual examples of The Protocols of Zion – updated “Who Rules America/the media” is an important task that someone on our side should do.
What do you mean “Doxed”? He has always operated under his name.
Sorry for any miscommunication Mr. Johnson Sir.
I’m aware that Nick Fuentes has always used his real name.
I just notice that the worst anti ha White, J, Antifa Leftist, ADL, SPLC, Conservative Inc, Zionist, Christian Zionists often take the next dirty step and do more than smear us by our real name in print or on the internet.
They get down and dirtier by Doxing us – publishing where we live, hang out, work, harass our friends and family, employers etc.
I note that a real Antifa, Trannie something actually came to Nick Fuentes home door with a gun with probable intent to murder Nick F.
If I recall correctly this assassin had just come from killing someone else.
Am I right in thinking that this is true? What happened to Nick F would be murderer?
This is an area where anyone remotely on our side drops the ball.
We don’t seem to follow up and monitor want happens to assassins , real life killers of ha White nationalist, Identitarian or even Christian Conservative leaders like Charlie Kirk.
Does anyone know of any interviews, interrogations of the arrested assassin of Charlie Kirk? This happened in Utah for god’s sake – that should be LDS Conservative legal system. Why isn’t the killer being interrogated to find out who paid for him, who gave the orders.
I don’t remember anyone ever following what happened to the homosexual, Je*ish pedophile Frank Colin who once led the Chicago based American Nazi party. I think he might still be alive writing books about UFOs or something.
What happened to the assassin of George Lincoln Rockwell – John Patler? Well here’s what Wikipedia says about Patler’s later life:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Patler
Patler apparently only served 8 YEARS for premeditated murder of our George Lincoln Rockwell! He was apparently paroled in 1975! I think this murderer of GLR Patler might be still alive at ~ 87! What the #*$*&#?
I seem to recall that many, many people including “The Tomorrow Host” Tom Snyder interviewed Charles Manson in Prison, but I don’t remember anyone ever interviewing Jack Ruby – the J strip club owner that killed Lee Harvey Oswald, and so far no one has interviewed this assassin of Charlie Kirk.
I apologize for rambling Mr. Johnson Sir.
My point was that Nick Fuentes was doxed to the point that a would be assassin/murderer showed up at his front door with a gun, with apparently an intent to murder Nick F!
JR
Fuentes is an low testosterone, Aztec worm who condemned our White brothers in Australia. White brothers who have had actual attempts on their lives sanctioned by the anti White regime that currently occupies Australian parliament. None of these men told the cops “they’re brown so how can I be racist” the way Fuentes did after his tranny boyfriend came to his house upset over being dumped.
NSN Australia would stand and fight together with any White American without hesitation. Anyone who claims to be for White people and condemns the best of us is a kosher plant.
Striker has been getting needlessly cunty about NSN Australia and particularly Joel Davis. Hope Sewell is in high spirits.
Striker is a do-nothing, Hollywood diva. It’s that simple. The only decent one among that crew of obese, disgusting freaks is Warren. Anyone who condemns White men risking everything for the future of White countries is an enemy.
I’ve heard Sewell is in good spirits. He was recently found not guilty for one of his politcally motived charges.
https://www.noticer.news/thomas-sewell-ballarat-rally-not-guilty/
On the last point, this one from 2013:
ETA – Expose Them All: Who controls your mind 2013 (eta-45.blogspot.com)
Some similar fun infographics:
Infotables – JewishContributions.com
My take on the Tucker/Fuentes interview was that it was very well organized and planned out. The Neocon wing of Con Inc. is trying their hardest to replace Kirk with a goof who will Pied Piper the young away from reality. I suspect that Tucker and some other folks did this to try and fill in that power vacuum from the right with neocon enemy Fuentes. One thing that happened several times was Tucker set up Fuentes as focusing on, “the Jews the Jews ! …” and Fuentes calmly pointed out the people apart with examples like Eric Weinstein’s hatred of Rome, Ackerman’s clear sole focus and other examples. I thought Fuentes did a great job with that and Tucker just let him do it.
My take was that Tucker’s we are all individuals was cover for normalizing other things that will increase the reach needed to break the grip of America as a vassal of an out group. I thought that was well done. Multiple times, Tucker also told us why he is still stuck on Civic Nationalism and individualism – America will fall apart if it becomes focused on ethnicity.
Tucker is right and I believe his desire to keep America together is sincere. However, he is missing the reality of the situation here. This is where Fuentes fumbled a bit. The reality is that America held together now, is only for the final hyper-looting phase that we are currently moving through. The entire project is dependent upon Whites remaining colorblind individualists while all of the other ethnic groups engage in tribal warfare. The minute enough Whites say, “No! We are White and we have interests and we put Our interests over the other tribes’ interests.”, is the minute that the empire collapses. It needs Whites to capitulate in order to finish colonizing it and extracting the last bits of healthy flesh from the carcass.
I don’t think Fuentes was prepared to point that out. I think if he had made that case, Tucker would have learned from him and Tucker’s tumbling down the rabbit hole would continue its descent. On the whole, that interview succeeded in countering the neocon attempts to replace Kirk with some goof and shill. In time, the role that White and White-only adherence to colorblind individualism plays in destroying and not preserving America must come out of Fuentes, Tucker or others. It will. There will be other opportunities if only because it is clearly a hobby horse of Tucker’s.
I don’t think Tucker means ill. I just think he has a blind spot there. He can be educated on this one, and we will do it.
Maybe Tucker is trying to promote Fuentes to keep neocons from filling the void left by Charlie Kirk. I had not thought of that angle. That certainly coincides with Fuentes’ own desires, and it is probably one reason he did the interview. But my sense is that in the long term, this interview might be seen as Fuentes’ high point. Maybe I am naive to think that truth, consistency, and character matter in the long run, but that’s the axiom that everything at CC depends upon. If I am right, Fuentes is just too self-contradictory, indifferent to truth, egomaniacal, immoral, and weird to stand up to the kind of scrutiny he is coming under now. So I think that Tucker set him up for a fall.
Nick Fuentes looks like a smirking little dweeb. Great article! 🙃
His petrified expression on police bodycam and groveling to them that he can’t be a racist because he’s a brown Mexican was the most pathetic but not surprising thing to witness.
I’ve seen others call him a weasel but I won’t do that. Weasels are ferocious defenders of their territory and offspring and ferocious hunters of rats and can endure some of the harshest of cold climates on this planet.
Nick appears to be of mainly European ancestry, though I don’t know the specifics. Either way, he should not be criticized or attacked on the basis of race or ancestry. I think he will be a great asset to our side based on his very high intelligence and good appearance if ever he becomes ideologically consistent. He still has a lot of room to mature.
He’s as white as he wants to be, and he code switches to Mexican on a dime. That shows his preference. He’s perfectly comfortable in a Latin racial caste society. We aren’t building such a place.
True, and if they do change, the overwhelming tendency is to want to go back into the matrix.
Reposting the specifics (source is a screenshot of his 23andme results):
Only 79.1% of his ancestry was categorized as European (incl. 63.7% Southern European, 13.2% Northwestern European). The remaining 20.9% were classified as such: 14.8% East Asian & Native American (the latter specifically at 13.7%), 2.3% Middle-Eastern & North African and 1.3% Sub-Sahara African. About 2.5% were apparently uncategorizeable.
Regarding intelligence: He’s not stupid, but he is an essentially dishonest person who excels at communication. Recently, he literally claimed that Ukrainians aren’t white, which is ironic given that regular eastern Ukrainians score ca. 98% European on the same DNA test he took:
https://preview.redd.it/6z4ytceez2t51.jpg?width=1080&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=53b5b0a9b0a70c15ae31b7f33cb64237bc315db1
Lastly, if you’re impressed by Fuentes’ intelligence you are probably susceptible to charisma and rhetoric boldness, both of whom he possesses to no small degree. A talented communicator or con artist will appear much brighter than he is to people insufficiently critical of him; a cult leader appears like a genius to his adherents.
There is one topic where Nick Fuentes does a great job, and that is raising awareness against pornography. Pornography and masturbation are extremely harmful to Whites. It literally sucks the strength out of our young people. That is why our birthrights are so low. Masturbation is essentially an invention for the destruction of the white race and the Christian religion. I advise you all to never touch your genitals with evil intentions. Never look at naked women, either on the internet, in magazines, or on television. It will destroy your mental fortitude and turn you into idiots. You will become weak and pathetic. Say NO to masturbation!
Nick hasn’t said anything original or insightful on that topic. As ever, he just repeats what everyone else has said, but his audience worships him as if he’s a sort of prophet or sage. And I’m willing to bet that Fuentes is a porn watcher due to the various boutique fetish chat groups he’s been in.
Like what? Brotherhood of the Dragonfly type stuff?
No. “The Dollhouse”.
😨
I found it curious that Tucker apologized for calling him Gay, but Nick was careful not to take the cue and clarify the matter.
🙂
Tucker is a bit behind the times. A lot of people under 30 these days are much weirder than “gay.” Fuentes is probably one of them, given that he was in tranny simping group chats and has surrounded himself with pedophiles and pedophile apologists. Read the Chris Brunet piece linked above.
I gave it a once-over. Even just on the basis of his own statements, Nick seems like quite a loose cannon on deck, to put it much too charitably. We don’t need flakes like that.
What has lead to Fuentes becoming weak and pathetic as he doesn’t watch pornography?
Indians are some of the most enthusiastic consumers of hardcore pornography and it doesn’t seem to be depressing their birth rates. Primates masturbate openly at the zoo, so I’m sure Australopithecus afarensis was doing the same. Its descendants have continued the practice in every culture for the duration of human history, yet you’ll notice this didn’t push homo sapiens into extinction. Pornography is illegal in South Korea, but they have the lowest birthrate in the world. Doesn’t seem to be much of a correlation here.
Hardcore porn is evil because it amounts to little more than the ritual degradation of white women by Jews and blacks. But it’s a ridiculous exaggeration to suggest that masturbation alone is to blame for collapsing white birthrates. There are so many asinine takes on the birthrate issue, when the reality is quite simple. Historically, people had many children because contraception and abortion were difficult, each child was a prospective laborer to help the family financially, and many children died in childbirth so you wanted to try for many just in case. When those circumstances are changed in any society, you see birth rates decline, regardless of if we’re looking at whites or East Asians. Regardless, whites have never been a global majority. It’s about quality over quantity.
I think the problem with porn and masturbation is that it allows young men to easily suppress their natural desire for women and sex. Without it they would have to actually go interact with girls. In the past, relations between the sexes were healthier, and young men still talked to and dated women, even if they were also masturbating and looking at nudie magazines.
Thank you for the story about Iryna’s Azure, which I had missed.
I think Greg Johnson’s low opinion of Fuentes is more or less well-founded.
Though I have long liked Fuentes, I never was a groyper, didn’t keep up with his show very much, and disagreed with him on a number of things. Lately, I have favored him less and less.
Ever since Charlie Kirk’s death, Fuentes has been different. Some of his views have surprised me and I see this mainstream clout he now receives. I find it all suspicious. Nick has a pattern of being petty, nasty, rude, ungrateful, spiteful, and malicious. And I suspect – along with many others – that NF is, indeed, a homosexual. I don’t hate gays, but homosexual acts are a sin and I think that if NF has those inclinations then that certainly weakens his resume as a pro-White leader (not that those inclinations in and of themselves would be necessarily disqualifying).
I think NF simply longs to pick up where he left off when he embarked on his political media journey years ago: as a mainstream figure – albeit along with the success and name for himself he has already made.
He was kicked out of the tribe, so to speak, went on a journey and has returned with a big name and great riches (money and audience).
It has all come full circle. He’s the star of his own show and to him no one else matters.
It’s as though he says: “Here I am, Conservative Inc! Look upon all I have done without you! Now imagine what I can do with you! Imagine what I can do FOR you!”
I do believe they have heard Nick’s value proposition and I believe they have accepted it.
And if NF is a homosexual, it would not surprise me if his coming out of the closet was part of the deal too. And I don’t even think NF would mind coming out of the closet because if he is gay then it looks like he’s only barely trying to hide it.
One thing I do like about NF is that he’s Catholic and I hope that no one attributes to Catholicism the faults of Fuentes nor those of any other Catholic.
And no, I don’t see how Catholicism is a vehicle for White identity politics, but authentic Catholicism is no impediment to it and can be complementary to it.
As a Catholic, I believe that even in Heaven there will be distinguishable races of man:
“After this I saw a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and tribes, and peoples, and tongues, standing before the throne, and in sight of the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands”
Revelation 7:9
I believe the races are God-created divisions of mankind:
“And hath made of one, all mankind, to dwell upon the whole face of the earth, determining appointed times, and the limits of their habitation. 27 That they should seek God, if happily they may feel after him or find him, although he be not far from every one of us:”
Acts 17:26-27
That being said, I wish to be clear that we Catholics believe in a right ordering of things. So the honest truth is that while a Catholic cannot place race above religion it is also true that a rightly ordered love of race in no way conflicts with the Catholic faith.
Pope Pius XI explained:
“Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the State, or a particular form of State, or the depositories of power, or any other fundamental value of the human community — however necessary and honorable be their function in worldly things — whoever raises these notions above their standard value and divinizes them to an idolatrous level, distorts and perverts an order of the world planned and created by God; he is far from the true faith in God and from the concept of life which that faith upholds. ”
Note that Pope Pius XI includes race as a “…fundamental value of the human community” saying even that it’s possible the function of such a value is “necessary and honorable”.
I doubt I’m converting anyone to the Catholic faith by what I said. I just don’t wish for the views of Fuentes nor for some of the views of “woke” Popes like Francis or Leo to be “stumbling blocks” to anyone curious about the Faith nor cause of division within pro-White politics.
When Tucker tired to rebut the claim of Jewish preponderance in neoconservatism by mentioning Cruz and Huckabee etc, all Nick had to do is lay down cards called Abrams, the Kristols, the Kagans, Boot, and the mastermind Wolfowitz, just to skim the surface.
Also the impression was given that the sum of the Jewish Question was the neocons but a quick nod to domestic politics and the Culture of Critique would dispel that notion. Simply mention that every area where White interests were undermined (immigration, civil rights, criminal law etc) was a Jewish production; and take one area to make it concrete, ie, Feminism and Friedan, Steinem and the rest.
For a more complete list take a look at an article I wrote called A Mighty Dose Of Poison at nationalvanguard.org.
Once these arguments are made in a comprehensive manner the layman will see the litany is long and legion and those who thought such massive and malign Jewish influence was preposterous will start out being suspicious and eventually see the light. For from Sontag to Bulter the Jews have never ceased waging a war on the White race.
Douglas, popular pantywaists Carlson and Fuentes aside for the moment, this one piece you wrote nearly five years ago should be required reading for every White American schoolchild as American history.
—
Douglas Mercer: October 31, 2025at 10:23 pm… Simply mention that every area where White interests were undermined (immigration, civil rights, criminal law etc) was a Jewish production… For a more complete list take a look at an article I wrote called “A Mighty Dose Of Poison” at nationalvanguard.org.
Once these arguments are made in a comprehensive manner the layman will see the litany is long and legion and those who thought such massive and malign Jewish influence was preposterous will start out being suspicious and eventually see the light.
—
That could still stand as your most important, illustrated essay yet, if I could pick just one. In a comment below it on NV Arch Stanton commented:
Wow! National Vanguard has outdone itself with this who’s who of the ugly Jew.
Speaking of Jim Goad.. how is he doing?
Alive, I hope…?
There’s a YouTube channel called ‘Compound Censored’, a video of Jim and Gavin Mcinnes discussing MLK lies which was uploaded five months ago. Not sure if it’s a repost or actually five months ago.
Last time I attended a Traditional Catholic mass I saw several White men with their Hispanic or filopina brood mare wives in tow along with their mongrel offspring. Yes, they are probably jew wise, but for Catholics, making race an “idol” is a sin.
I’m not much of a churchgoer, but when I lived in NYC I attended traditional mass a couple times–this is around 2016–and the congregation was heavily Hispanic. That quelled my interest.
Greg thank you for the piece on Irina, such a beautiful tribute to her. As someone who has unofficially studied Aposematism and Deimatic behavior butterflies are always sighted as examples in both. I collect butterfly wings and would never have known about it so thanks for the link. I’ll look out for an Irina’s Azure for sure.
I knew a man who collected all kinds of mostly beautiful butterflies. He told me he would catch them, kill them soon afterwards, then pin them on a board and then frame it.
Killing butterflies and then displaying them so that he can say their names in English and Latin and show these little corpses off to all and sundry. People can be such assholes.
I regret not stating how I collect them. I have wings and wing clippings of fallen butterflies. Being in the North East most of the wings I have are Monarchs and Swallow tails. Spring time is when Monarch butterflies set off for Mexico. (utterly amazing an insect can find it’s way to a particular forest in Mexico from Canada). Unfortunately not all make it there. My wife’s milkweed plants which we decided to plant solely to help Monarchs on their way means we do often find the fallen ones who didn’t get further in their journey. Their wings are just too beautiful to not preserve.
The only bugs that get splattered in are those demonic looking house centipedes and that’s only if they’re in my house. All others get the catch and release.
Bless ya. We had some milkweed coming up in a muddy, poor-soil part of our acreage, and, yes, somehow the monarchs found then. Nature is amazing.
Agreed.
One correction on my part, Monarch butterflies set of for Mexico in Autumn not Spring.
How choosy should we be about who is White or White enough? I say very choosy, but not to the maximum extent. I’m advocating other people take the same attitude.
White genetics are good and there is nothing wrong with all-White genetics as a standard. We can’t really maintain our numbers by redefining part-Whites as White.
We shouldn’t be Nordicist and we shouldn’t redefine some other fraction of our race as the only true Whites. The Slav and the Celt, the Latin and the Teuton are all equally White, though they may have additional group interests as a member of a sub-race. If an Irish ginger wants to marry another Irish ginger and make more Irish gingers, that is all to the good.
This is unclear and hard to justify but unlike most pro-Whites I think conduct is part of White racial identity. If a man has all White genes but he marries Jewish, his children are Jewish, and he protects his genetic future, a future in which Jews will dominate, I feel that the White man in front of me is to some extent an illusion, and his bloodline is the truth.
If a shallow and self-seeking man has some White genes and some non-White genes, if he says he is White when it suits him but not when it doesn’t suit him, if he isn’t really pro-White and he is not acknowledging and opposing White genocide even though it is happening, is he entitled to racial solidarity from pro-Whites?
I say, let people like this get solidarity from others like themselves.
In an age of antiwhite policies amounting to White genocide, we have our work cut out protecting our own people.
The case of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska still bothers me, and cases like this should bother other pro-Whites too. This is where our sympathy should go.
There’s a basic confusion in this chat (not in your own comments, but in the chat above) between:
1. Us vs. Them (which for me is defined ultimately in racial terms, since white people worldwide are under threat and need to reassert political control over their homelands to be saved)
2. Friend vs. Enemy in the political sense (which for me is based on attitudes, not DNA, meaning that plenty of lilywhite people are enemies of the white race, and some non-white people are friends/allies of whites).
Fuentes, at best, would fit in the latter category. But he doesn’t belong there, because his ultimate political goals are not consistent with white preservation, not because Catholic reactionaries are hostile to white preservation per se, but they are indifferent to it, hence the massive miscegenation we see in Catholic-colonized places in the Americas, Africa, and the Orient, one product of which is Fuentes himself.
I agree. The distinction between Whites and non-Whites is a racial distinction. The distinction between pro-Whites and antiwhites is a political distinction. We cannot get these fundamental things too clear.
“Although Fuentes is bad on race and identity, he’s very good on the Jewish question…”
I have to say, Greg, I disagree even with this. I just think Fuentes has no redeeming qualities at all. His main problem with “the Jews” is that, in his words, “they killed God.” His antisemitism is the most low-IQ variant: I hate the Jews because they rejected their Jewish Messiah.
Of course, Fuentes’ blustering regurgitation of medieval-era antisemitism was just part of his performative Christianity and attempt to garner a broader, Christian audience for his one-man chat show. Because Fuentes has never said a sincere thing in his life. While hating “the Jews” for rejecting Jesus and “killing God”, he has also acknowledged (perhaps because an actual Christian explained it to him) that most of the early Christians were Jews themselves, just as Rabbi Yeshua was, and that the Pharisees had to reject Jesus and have him crucified in order to fulfil the prophecy and for salvation to be offered to the Gentiles. Fuentes acknowledges this things while still slandering and attacking critics of Christianity who point out these very same facts when they argue that Christianity is a Judaic off-shoot religion that has caused and is presently causing harm to the European peoples.
Therefore, he is not “good on the Jewish question” but is in fact causing confusion, redirecting massive amounts of energy into a pointless religious debate, and his solution to the JQ is to make them all Catholics. Brilliant Nick, just brilliant. Truly he is “the leader of the right”, as I’ve been repeatedly informed.
As for anything else he has said about Jews, it’s basic stuff: the Israel lobby has too much power, why can’t we question them, holocaust doubt, etc. Everyone within the margins of the dis-alt-nat right has said these things, and Fuentes is merely standing on the shoulders of other people and repeating what they said. I don’t think he has a profound understanding of the JQ at all, actually.
And again, we always have to wonder how much of what he has said was just part of his court jester act. Apparently, when he was making jokes about cookies in the oven and proclaiming himself Hitler 2, 3, and 4, that was all well and good, but now when a white kid wears a SS uniform as a Halloween costume, 2025 Nick says that’s cringe and has no “aura”. But Kanye West wearing a swastika necklace and rapping “nigga heil Hitler”, why that’s based and gonna save America!
Nick essentially plays the Jews’ favourite character: the dumb Christian villain who hates them for either no reason, or the stupidest reason imaginable.
Nick Fuentes scores no better than E. Michael Jones on the JQ, which means probably worse than zero ─ if that is even possible.
For them, Race is completely irrelevant ─ and so are the Joos, to be honest.
In fact, the only issue of meaning for them, whatsoever, is getting more rear ends parked onto the pews.
Also, it was hard not to notice in the interview, that Tucker and Fuentes were playing the stupidest NAXALT parlor games and straw-manning of the Jewish Question.
The bill of goods they sell would make St. George Floyd blush.
🙂
We don’t want to be ruled by Jews who have professed Christ and therefore who have become perfect from a Christian point of view. We want our race to have a future again, which requires that we have to live apart from other races and be ruled by our own and not by others.
E.M. Jones is a disappointment and could have been a real powerful voice/ally if he wasn’t so goddamn raceless in total denial even after his friend was murdered by one. Libido Dominandi and The jewish Revolutionary spirit were impressive works but I can’t with someone who so colorblinds himself at almost 80 years old.
I am sure you are right about this Angelo on the foundational issues. Catholics think Jews can be magically cured with a splash of holy water. I completely disagree with that. Where Fuentes is good is commenting on the Jewish control of American politics, using examples from the news cycle. These are the clips that I have seen, and these sorts of red pills are very useful to have circulating.
This was years ago, some mainstream television interview with Ann Coulter, where she said that Jews must accept Christ. If I remember right, she implied that was the only way that antisemitism would cease, but don’t quote me on that.
I am sure that they can do the Christian studies and get baptized, but it does not change them internally. Bred in the bone and all that. Same as white people studying judaism and going thru the rituals (to please the person they are marrying) – they are never fully accepted by true jews.
Catholics think Jews can be magically cured with a splash of holy water. I completely disagree with that.
That’s the crux of the issue: Jews never truly adopted a European identity after 1789. I often think that a Jewish state should have been carved out of the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian and Russian Empires, somewhere in the region of modern-day eastern Poland. All Jews could then have been transferred there (though this leaves unresolved the issue of Jews in America). They might have developed a consciousness of themselves as one European people among many, with their own state in the heart of Europe—even if they never adopted the Christian faith. They would have ceased to be an anti-European factor.
Greg Johnson: November 1, 2025 … Where Fuentes is good is commenting on the Jewish control of American politics, using examples from the news cycle. These are the clips that I have seen, and these sorts of red pills are very useful to have circulating…
—
Not to be a contrarian, Greg, but I don’t need to see any comments from the poseur Fuentes, taken from the controlled news cycle on social media and podcasts. He’s a phony and Our Cause does not need more half-baked phonies misguiding our people. I know about Jews and I know about Christians, their controlled opposition. What serious racial nationalist/separatist/preservationist needs to be “red-pilled” by Fuentes? None!
Interesting. From an English perspective, although I am no longer there, Fuentes has sucker-punched a lot of people. I suspect you are spot-on with this.
“Now that Charlie Kirk is dead, he is running toward the mainstream thinking he can pick up Kirk’s audience.”
Which is,as you say, slimy.
How is Fuentes “not white”?
He’s White enough to visually pass and no mexican would ever claim him but his minority non-European phenotypical expression doesn’t bleed through to show like Joe Mazzula or Giancarlo Esposito’s obvious afroness.
Does anyone else find it suspicious that Nick called out both Third Worldism and Tucker’s promotion of Russian narratives, and then deleted those claims, shortly before the interview? Here’s a pic of one of his deleted Telegram posts:
https://imgur.com/a/Z6DzjFa
It would not surprise me (at all) to learn that Tucker was afraid of this going viral and offered Fuentes an interview in exchange for backing off. Nick was bribed with publicity and the deal was he had to stop talking about something that is clearly a weak spot for Tucker.
As for major US publications, like the New York Times, being nice to Nick lately… they are likely aware of this dynamic and are willing to give Fuentes a big enough leash so he eventually feels comfortable turning on Tucker / Candace / etc. They probably think they can use Fuentes as a tool to damage Tucker & Co. and then they’ll go back to ignoring Fuentes.
Just my two cents.
I basically agree with this analysis, and the details you point out support it nicely.
What an utter piece of shit Fuentes is. He spent years literally cheerleading for Putin and Russia. His words exactly in his AFPAC conference speech: “Can we get a round of applause for Russia?” Only recently did he admit that all his pro-Russia posturing was just a “joke” because he was resentful towards the American regime which he considered to be oppressing him personally. Now he wants to attack others for having genuine (if misguided) pro-Russia sentiments? Honestly, I wish this freak would vanish forever.
He spent years literally cheerleading for Putin and Russia. I wouldn’t call either of them cheerleaders but do have opinions of the WarStrike guys supporting Russia? Misguided ignorance or they know something pro-Ukrainians don’t? I don’t know enough about the details to comment on the war but it seems a cheap shot to condemn people with a yellow and blue flag of support on their window. Striker takes joy in scoffing at those people which I find an bit out of bounds.
white hispanics are at a minimum, white adjacent. Isn’t it a good thing that they are with us? They remind me of the Irish in America: they weren’t regarded as white but were begrudgingly accorded white adjacent status. This is how I read Dr. Johnson’s attitude.
at the end of the day, race matters most to me. I don’t care if Asians come with high IQ’s, they still need to be banned from coming here. Blacks should be incentivized to move to Ghana. And I would say let’s open the door to white hispanic immigration.
There’s an assumption underlying this that smacks of what I call “white grandiosity,” namely that whether or not people think of themselves as another group, especially an enemy group, depends ENTIRELY on OUR ATTITUDE toward them. That’s just not the case. Other people have choices too.
Someone like Fuentes is as white as he wants to be. If he said he were entirely white, everyone would have accepted that. Instead, he shared his genetic tests and constantly code-switches from being a preppy white snob who puts down poor people who are actually white to “I’m Mexican” when it suits him. That’s the sort of behavior you expect from a white presenting snob in a mixed-race country like Mexico.
My conclusion is that he’s bad for white identity politics because he isn’t really about white preservationism. He’s about his own advancement and self-gratification, and he blurs the essential issues with being pro-Catholic or pro-Muslim/anti-Jewish, but he never just comes out for simple white advocacy — even as a non-white ally of whites — because that’s not really who he is.
The Irish always were regarded as White. Don’t let the arch-douchebag (((Noel Ignatiev))) fool you about that. Millions of them came to America while we had a Whites-only immigration policy. Whatever 19th century opposition to them there was had to do with things besides race.
Anyone who uses “The Irish weren’t considered White” has a lot of intellectual intifada to do. Shake of the Jewish subterfuge. Of all the troubles between the Anglo Saxons and the Irish, not being White was never one of them.
Tucker still clings to the ideal of America as the land of opportunity, freedom, and equality. Only white people think this way anymore. He simply must see through this illusion; made to see through it.
Iryna’s Azure: What a delicate touch to nudge white people toward racial consciousness. It needs to be on a t-shirt. Spiteful whites and hateful nons would really show their hands by calling it racist.
Regarding the recent articles published here about Fuentes, this is my opinion.
Greg: The biggest news in Nationalism This Week is that Tucker Carlson interviewed Nick Fuentes. Everyone knows that I think that Fuentes is a slimy, unprincipled opportunist who is bad for white identity politics because (1) he isn’t white, and (2) his only (apparent) absolute is Catholicism.
—
I agree with you about Fuentes, but Carleson’s fatuous interview with him about Jewish supremacism is “The biggest news in Nationalism this week”? Really? More social media nonsense. If this interview sets the groundwork for a Carlson interview about the JQ with Jared, that’s one I will watch.
Jew nationalists (Zionists) certainly believe that it was big — at least that repulsive Florida GOP Congressman and Trump booster Randy Fine does.
Rep. Randy Fine denounces Tucker Carlson as ‘most dangerous antisemite in America’ – Jewish Telegraphic Agency
By Joseph Strauss
November 1, 2025
LAS VEGAS — Most of the Republicans denouncing an explosion of antisemitism on the right at this weekend’s Republican Jewish Coalition convention refrained from naming names.
Not so for Randy Fine, one of four Jewish Republicans in Congress.
“Make no mistake. Today, Tucker Carlson is the most dangerous antisemite in America,” he said during an address Saturday morning. “He has chosen to take on the mantle of leader of a modern-day Hitler Youth.”
He continued by listing Carlson’s offenses: “To broadcast and feature those who celebrate the Nazis, those who call for the extermination of Israel, to defend Hamas, to even criticize President Trump for stopping Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Friends, make no mistake: Tucker is not MAGA.”
In front of Fine, dozens of student volunteers held up signs with that message that the RJC had prepared. The group’s convention has taken place under a shadow cast by Carlson, the former Fox News host who last week hosted the white supremacist Nick Fuentes on his popular streaming show.
In their first-ever joint appearance, the duo discussed “these Zionist Jews” at length, with Carlson and Fuentes both expressing opposition to U.S. support for Israel and Fuentes describing his views on Jews and Judaism at length….
More at this JTA report.
A Fuentes fan is anti-Israel candidate for governor in Florida. Jewry describes him as coming from the “very online far right.” See: “Florida GOP Gubernatorial Candidate Opposes Israel” at WhiteBiocentrism.com. Be careful cheering for this fellow.
—
Will Williams: November 3, 2025
Greg: The biggest news in Nationalism This Week is that Tucker Carlson interviewed Nick Fuentes. Everyone knows that I think that Fuentes is a slimy, unprincipled opportunist who is bad for white identity politics because (1) he isn’t white, and (2) his only (apparent) absolute is Catholicism.
—
I agree with you about Fuentes, Greg, but Carlson’s fatuous interview with him about Jewish supremacism is “The biggest news in Nationalism this week”? Really? More social media nonsense…
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.