You can buy Greg Johnson’s Toward a New Nationalism here.
152 words
1. The Counter-Currents 2025 Fundraiser
Our fundraiser total now stands at $89,862.45. Once again, my sincerest thanks. Our goal this year is $300,000, and we are now more than $70,000 behind where we were at the same time last year ($159,974.74). A generous donor has offered a $7,000 matching grant, and about $3,000 remains, so now is a good time to help out.
There are many ways to donate to Counter-Currents, but the easiest is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.
You can explore all your donation options on our Donate page.
2. This Sunday on Counter-Currents Radio
This weekend, Counter-Currents Radio will be on Sunday, not Saturday. Greg Johnson will host a debate between David Zsutty and Greg Conte on Left vs. Right.
Join us at Noon Pacific/3 PM Eastern/9 PM Central European Time on:
- Odysee: https://odysee.com/@countercurrents/Conte-Debate
- DLive: https://dlive.tv/Counter-Currents
- Send questions & donations to Entropy: entropystream.live/countercurrents
14 comments
Checks went out 10/01/2025. Thank you! 🙃
Thanks for your faithful support.
An additional note about e-Check donations: if, like me, you have long since misplaced your checkbook but do online banking, log into your account and you can easily get your necessary information (routing and account number) there. Most banks should have both numbers right there around your account summary to click on and see.
Thank you for everything James. I sent 25. electronically. With the match: $50. more to CC.
Thank you, Kim. We appreciate that very much. (And I hope the payment processor behaved itself this time!)
Looking forward to this debate. Have posted links on my social media posts.
IMO – Counter Currents, TPC, Amren should move on to video podcasts, move away from just radio, audio commentary by (Yes, audio commentary done by very well read, intelligent guys). Talk radio was IMO the media of the early 1990s, not just Rush Limblob lots of local and national influencers – yes Howard Stern. Many of the more successful AM talk radio hosts were a bit White identitarian, bashing the anti White Lib (ie J) TV media.
But, now the hottest , most influential media are video podcasts. IMO – the best format is some cleaver older ha White guy (Adam Corolla) and some very pretty, a bit sexy but not slutty female assistant. Men and yes women – like to see a pretty young female (ha White) presenter , assistant. Women in particular like to see what their rivals are wearing, who they are dating, the size of their rivals butts.
IMO – we are very limited if it’s just White guys commenting on, lamenting all the bad things happening to our people in crime, politics etc.
Also, women viewers, listeners love to see women putting down Woke bit*hes. Meagan Kelly has huge ratings also someone named Trish Rogan and that Daily Wire young thing I think her name was Brett Cooper – the comment section featuring “Brett Cooper” (She talked too much for my taste).
But check out this Adam Corolla podcast with his very pretty blond young assistant Erica Rhodes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTAB3pfcGyA
I’m a technophobic dunce but I believe short spliced clips maybe 1-2 minutes long of editing speeches or serious takes inserted with movie clips and by making funny, can meem virally. For example, an anti-miscegenation advocate countered by a snippy liberal asking “why not?!” Then to Willy Wonka: “because that pipe doesn’t go to the marshmallow room, it goes to the fudge room!” Or michelle obama babbling about something dumb then Vinny Gambini: “Everything that guy just said is bullshit. Thank you.” And of course Doc Brown, “When this baby hits 88mph, you’re gonna see some serious shit.” The more media savvy of ours should attempt this. Injecting short, sharp funny bursts may get through to the masses than mere droning speeches.
I’m very interested to hear this debate. Won’t be able to listen until you get the time-stamped version released, I can’t listen live (too many interruptions).
Wonderful debate! I sent in some farthings to Counter-Currents. I hope others will do likewise. This is exactly what is needed.
A few points. I think destroying anti-Whiteness is fundamental because if that is not done, then nothing else matters.
The JQ is also essential, but I don’t agree that a radical extirpation of Jewish power automatically defeats the anti-White system, nor does it automatically give us White Power or even pro-Whiteness.
Even without the Joos, without White Power, it’s all still a colossal FAIL.
We are not going to meet any goal if we do not decisively address the Jewish Question, of course, but fighting the Joos is not all there is to it.
Also, it bears pointing out that Zionism is not about Israel in reality but about the Diaspora. That is straight out of Mein Kampf.
Whether they like the Joos or not, trying to weaponize Muslims and Coloreds somehow for White interests is an inherently-flawed strategy. That is what Rockwell thought, and I have seen nothing in the last sixty years to counter his idea. True, the Israeli hardliners have had a PR problem recently, but let’s not overstate this.
If Israel were really inclined to walk anything back ─ which they aren’t ─ there would be more than an occasional milquetoast Libtard or even Trumpian rebuke of Netanyahoo in a press conference; the Prime Minister of the Jewish State would already be out of power in disgrace. If anything, a brutal total war policy on Gaza gains him support where it counts.
Remember that the Joos invented the polemical term “Genocide” (1944) and we play their game at our peril. We will never out-Genocide Propaganda the Joos.
Although I was hugely disappointed in a way by the Charlie Kirk memorial event ─ which brought in so many televangelical, Christian, Kosher Conservative, and even Zionist themes ─ it remains a fact that Charlie’s martydom occurred on an American University campus, and we simply have to take these essential spaces back. Essential.
The question was raised in the debate: which is more important, pro-White spaces Online or Street Action.
Well, both, obviously. The Internet has greater potential. But the main purpose of “street action” is to advance our Propaganda and to generate Lawfare to underscore that our literal free-speech is about ideas and debate about White Power, and not violence.
That way we can concretely convince the normies of the Truth, i.e., that the Left thinks that literal violence is their free-speech. As Rockwell used to say in the 1960s, the rioters are not going after your trust fund, madam; they are going after your daughter’s White skin.
We don’t have the resources now to do street action or even passing out “It’s Okay to be White” flyers, because if one of our guys so much as jaywalks, he might be tossed into jail for years awaiting a trial.
And heaven forbid if some dumb Libtard fat chick gets killed in an accident or something “because” our side had a rally or exercised their free-speech. But to not use these 1st Amendment rights is to surrender them to the execrable and violent Left.
Building up a competent “lawfare cadre” is essential, but baby steps are needed. How many of you White Nationalists would defend the free-speech of a Nazi? Well, that is the litmus test, perhaps, for eradicating the Kosher Conservatives and steering a new course.
The GOP is spineless and has been since the Jewish Question was suppressed in the middle of the last century ─ but there is still some “baby” in the proverbial bathwater, which is not something that can be said for the Libtards and the Democrats.
The academic professionals and AntiFa were not shy about characterizing Turning Point USA as “White Nationalist,” and Charlie Kirk as “Fascist.” We know it is absurd, but this is the essential friend-enemy distinction here that should be obvious.
The tragic and horrible, blatant, and probably cowardly, assassination of Mr. Kirk on September 10, 2025 by a half-witted AntiFa twink is a wonderful opportunity to reclaim University debate spaces which we never should have surrendered.
Charlie Kirk was not afraid of engaging these Leftist vermin in debate, and neither should we. Yes, it might cost an exorbitant amount for security, as Mr. Jared Taylor found when he spoke at ASU in 2022. But this is hugely safer than any kind of street action, which has any number of ways to go South. These costs, plus Lawfare, are simply the costs of doing business.
To put it quite frankly, if our White Power movement is not a presence on college campuses and academic debates, like Rockwell in the 1960s, then we are not serious as a Movement at all.
I’m no LARPer and have little organizational talent, but I have never shied away from calling myself a Nazi ─ and in the late 1970s and early 1980s, I sent my mites into outfits like the NSWPP, and the New Order that replaced them before they fizzled out into some kind of esoteric Hitlerism.
That kind of safe non-political thing went about as far as the simpletons who actually tried to bootstrap a revolution by hijacking armored cars and assassinating obnoxious Jewish radio talk show hosts.
I think it is essential that National Socialism needs to be well-represented on the Right but not necessarily driving the modern movement, which has many other sensibilities and historical realities beyond 1930s Germany.
Counter-Currents has always tolerated my views on Holocaust “Denial” and broadly supported Rightwing thinking. We need more of this, and not just edgy podcasts.
Nationalism is essential and so is the Right. This is not “wrapping ourselves in the flag.” I find such admonitions to be quite tiresome, and crashing through an open gate.
I registered as a Republican for the first time in 2016 so that I could vote for Donald Trump in the Primary. This was the first time that anybody ever took the immigration problem seriously unless one counts President Reagan’s disasterous 1986 amnesty.
Since 2017, the courts themselves have moved significantly to the Right, and Libtards are none too happy about it. This is a huge step forward on the path to victory.
Yes, there is much farther to go but this is the most progress that I have seen in the last fifty or more years. Mr. Zsutty is correct that what broke the dam is Trump Derangement Syndrome. The mask has finally fallen off the Left and they are exposed for what they are.
Also, the feckless Mr. Trump, having been rebuked in 2020, is at least sensitive now to chimping from the Right, which is a constituency that he can’t ignore. His second term has been much more successful than his first ─ and we need to maintain this kind of momentum past 2026 and 2028.
So I am siding with Mr. Zsutty on this one, although I found Mr. Conte to be quite impressive. We need lots more debates of this quality.
Lastly, I want to countersignal the notion that Trump going after AntiFa will be bad for us because the law will just be used against us. Nonsense.
Ideas are not Violence. Violence is Violence. And there are long precedents in the Law for handling just such things. Striker tried to make that “learned helplessness” argument at TRS when it was argued that anarcho-criminals should not be given the Death Penalty by the Trump Administration because it will then happen to us.
No. Either White people are writing this novel or Kafka is. And if it really ain’t White people, then there is simply no point at all, and we might as well just go back to the Vidya.
🙂
Striker tried to make that “learned helplessness” argument at TRS when it was argued that anarcho-criminals should not be given the Death Penalty by the Trump Administration because it will then happen to us. I occasionally listen to the WarStrike podcast and believe Warren would be very good on TV as I genuinely like the guy and his takes, but striker just irks the shit out of me. I do not like him regardless of his opinions and can come off as a bit of a know it all.
I don’t mean to be too hard on Striker. I do tend to be rather opinionated. I like Warren and I especially liked it when he would have the elder Mr. Balogh on the podcasts, who used to be in the NSWPP and or National Alliance, if I remember correctly.
🙂
I didn’t have enough space in my superchat in order to elaborate on David’s statement related to the fact that high entropy societies facilitate Jewish power and influence. That’s a deep observation, but it’s incomplete. What we are talking about here is a threshold phenomenon. Controlled high entropy societies facilitate Jewish power and influence.
Natural phenomena ruled by threshold dynamics include earthquakes, forest fires, avalanches, neural network activity, sand pile avalanches, erosion, and social phenomena, where a critical point or “threshold” must be reached for a change in state or behavior to occur.
There is an entropy threshold above which they will be losing most of their power. In a completely polarized chaotic environment (not necessarily a failed state or civil war) things get out of control.
In the future big geopolitical games between America, China, Russia, if America falls, then Israel falls. While the dictatorial empires move quickly and in a focused manner in the direction dictated by their long term interest , a democratic America has to fight the enemy from within forever Sooner or later, that will lead to disaster, and they know that.
My personal opinion is that it’s a mistake to focus on Jewish power and influence, while following a mid 20th century national socialist ideology. We live in a different time, and at this point in history, they might not be the greatest enemy of white nationalism. Of course I could be wrong, it is a personal opinion. At the present moment, I think their long term interests and the objectives of white nationalists are quite close, why not take advantage ? They started to realize that their historical alliance with the extreme left , with all the nihilism and anarchism associated with the left, might not be in their long term interest.
Well, any kind of White Nationalist Movement that does not sufficiently keep Jews out of its Leadership and Funding is bound to fail. Full Stop.
And if that attitude is in reality the ultimate definition of “Nazi,” then it simply can’t be denied or eschewed.
This point has to be underscored with or without any kind of LARPing or nostalgia for the Third Reich.
Both Mssrs. Conte and Zsutty seem to agree on that point.
🙂
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.