1,718 words
Editor’s Note: This essay is from Michael Polignano’s book Taking Our Own Side, available in hardcover, paperback, and e-book here.
Multiculturalism is not an attempt to “enrich” white cultures by adding sundry non-white cultures. It is an attempt to replace white cultures with non-white cultures — or, more precisely, with fantasies, lies, and sanitized half-truths about non-white cultures designed to make them seem spiritually and morally superior. The purpose is to induce racial guilt in gullible whites which can be exploited for the purpose of white dispossession.
An elegant proof of this thesis is “Indigenous Peoples Day,” which is the multiculturalist replacement for Columbus Day, the holiday honoring the white (re-)discovery of the Americas in 1492. The idea was first proposed in 1977 at a United Nations-sponsored International Conference on Discrimination Against Indigenous Populations in the Americas, which took place in Geneva, Switzerland. It received impetus from the approach of celebrations of the 500th anniversary of Columbus’s arrival on Turtle Island on October 12th, 1992. In July of 1990, representatives of 120 American Indian tribes and various human rights, peace, social justice, and environmental organizations met in Quito, Ecuador, and announced the plan to turn Columbus Day 1992 into a forum for denouncing white imperialism, colonialism, genocide, and environmental destruction in the Americas and for celebrating indigenous cultures and their resistance to whites. (Apparently, “nativism” and anti-immigrant xenophobia are only bad when practiced by white people.)
In the San Francisco Bay area, a “Resistance 500 Task Force” proposed to the Berkeley City Council that Columbus Day be replaced with Indigenous Peoples Day. They did not merely argue that Amerindians deserved a holiday, but that Columbus did not deserve one because he was guilty of genocide. The Berkeley City Council voted unanimously to adopt the proposal, thereby symbolically repudiating all of white history and civilization in the Americas. (In 1990, Berkeley changed Columbus Day to Native American Day. In 1991 the name Indigenous Peoples Day was adopted. After several flip-flops under pressure from both Italian American and Amerindian groups, in 1996 Berkeley adopted the compromise “Indigenous Peoples Day-Columbus Day.”) Other California cities followed Berkeley’s lead, as did the state of South Dakota.
I have mixed feelings about Indigenous Peoples Day. On the one hand, Columbus did kill, enslave, exploit, and plunder the Indians he discovered out of sheer base greed, and these are behaviors that no civilized society should tolerate.
On the other hand, the frontier between two societies is not civilized. There is no common culture, government, or legal system to adjudicate disputes peacefully. Instead, there are competing systems, i.e., a state of war. The notion that Columbus and the Amerindians could appeal to common moral sentiments of humanity and fair play seems like a sentimental ethnocentric projection when one reads actual accounts of Amerindian cultures.
So it seems foolish and decadent when modern Americans, who have never had to face unsubjugated savages, morally condemn the much tougher men who wrested this continent from them, the men whose blood and sweat purchased the long and enervating peace in which fantasies about noble savages and white guilt could grow unchecked.
What I reject is the use of Indigenous Peoples Day as an occasion to spread lies about the unqualified virtues of the Amerindians and the unqualified depravity of whites. I am glad that whites conquered and colonized the Americas. All told, it is a much better place for our presence. I celebrate Columbus Day not because of Columbus himself, but because of the historical transformations he set in motion.
But I grant that the history of white men in the Americas is not just a record of creativity and progress, but also of crimes and follies — written in blood and stained with tears. But the same is true of red men in the Americas, and of all races of men everywhere in the world. Thus it is transparent anti-white racism to create a holiday where whites are asked to feel guilt for the crimes of fellow whites but the other races are exempted from the same moral reflection and instead play the role of accusers.
As a first step toward balancing Indigenous Peoples Day propaganda, I recommend Kevin Beary’s essay “Life Styles: Native and Imposed.” There Beary quotes Bernal Díaz del Castillo’s The Conquest of New Spain, which chronicles Hernán Cortés’ discovery and conquest of the Aztec empire. As Díaz reports, in the town of Cempoala near the Gulf of Mexico:
Every day they [the Native American priests] sacrificed before our eyes three, four, or five Indians, whose hearts were offered to those idols, and whose blood was plastered on the walls. The feet, arms, and legs of their victims were cut off and eaten, just as we eat beef from the butcher’s in our country. I even believe that they sold it in the tianguez or markets.
When the Spaniards reached Tenochtitlan, the capital of the Aztec empire and the site of present-day Mexico City, Díaz had occasion to observe the Emperor Montezuma’s dinner table:
. . . more than thirty dishes [were] cooked in their native style . . . I have heard that they used to cook him the flesh of young boys. But as he had such a variety of dishes, made of so many different ingredients, we could not tell whether a dish was of human flesh or anything else . . . I know for certain, however, that after our Captain spoke against the sacrifice of human beings and the eating of their flesh, Montezuma ordered that it should no longer be served to him.
Díaz also describes how the Aztecs performed human sacrifices:
They strike open the wretched Indian’s chest with flint knives and hastily tear out the palpitating heart which, with the blood, they present to the idols in whose name they have performed the sacrifice. Then they cut off the arms, thighs, and head, eating the arms and thighs at their ceremonial banquets. The head they hang up on a beam, and the body of the sacrificed man is not eaten but given to the beasts of prey.
Díaz also describes the widespread practice of slavery in the Aztec empire. In the great market of Tenochtitlan, he saw:
. . . dealers in gold, silver, and precious stones, feather, cloaks, and embroidered goods, and male and female slaves who are also sold there. They bring as many slaves to be sold in that market as the Portuguese bring Negroes from Guinea. Some are brought there attached to long poles by means of collars round their necks to prevent them from escaping, but others are left loose.
As for the Indians of North America, they were not always the peaceful purveyors of tax-free cigarettes, casino gambling, and earthy wisdom we know today. Beary quotes Francis Parkman’s France and England in North America, where he describes an attack by the Iroquois on an Algonquin hunting party, in the autumn of 1641, and the Iroquois’ treatment of their prisoners:
They bound the prisoners hand and foot, rekindled the fire, slung the kettles, cut the bodies of the slain to pieces, and boiled and devoured them before the eyes of the wretched survivors. “In a word,” says the narrator [that is, the Algonquin woman who escaped to tell the tale], “they ate men with as much appetite and more pleasure than hunters eat a boar or a stag . . .”
The conquerors feasted in the lodge till nearly daybreak . . . then began their march homeward with their prisoners. Among these were three women, of whom the narrator was one, who had each a child of a few weeks or months old. At the first halt, their captors took the infants from them, tied them to wooden spits, placed them to die slowly before a fire, and feasted on them before the eyes of the agonized mothers, whose shrieks, supplications, and frantic efforts to break the cords that bound them were met with mockery and laughter . . .
The Iroquois arrived at their village with their prisoners, whose torture was designed to cause all possible suffering without touching life. It consisted in blows with sticks and cudgels, gashing their limbs with knives, cutting off their fingers with clam-shells, scorching them with firebrands, and other indescribable torments. The women were stripped naked, and forced to dance to the singing of the male prisoners, amid the applause and laughter of the crowd . . .
On the following morning, they were placed on a large scaffold, in sight of the whole population. It was a gala-day. Young and old were gathered from far and near. Some mounted the scaffold, and scorched them with torches and firebrands; while the children, standing beneath the bark platform, applied fire to the feet of the prisoners between the crevices . . . The stoicism of one of the warriors enraged his captors beyond measure . . . they fell upon him with redoubled fury, till their knives and firebrands left in him no semblance of humanity. He was defiant to the last, and when death came to his relief, they tore out his heart and devoured it; then hacked him in pieces, and made their feast of triumph on his mangled limbs.
All the men and all the old women of the party were put to death in a similar manner, though but few displayed the same amazing fortitude. The younger women, of whom there were about thirty, after passing their ordeal of torture, were permitted to live; and, disfigured as they were, were distributed among the several villages, as concubines or slaves to the Iroquois warriors. Of this number were the narrator and her companion, who . . . escaped at night into the forest . . .
Ideally, I would like to get beyond whites and Amerindians trading atrocity stories about and demanding apologies for the actions of one another’s ancestors. But gaining a balanced picture of those atrocities is probably the only way to do this.
In the meantime, if today’s Native Americans wish to express shame and guilt for their racial brethren’s behavior, what better occasion than Indigenous Peoples Day?
October 11, 2004
If you want to support Counter-Currents, please send us a donation by going to our Entropy page and selecting “send paid chat.” Entropy allows you to donate any amount from $3 and up. All comments will be read and discussed in the next episode of Counter-Currents Radio, which airs every weekend on DLive.
Don’t forget to sign up for the twice-monthly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.
8 Comments
Manifest Destiny II, will be much worse than first episode….I advise our enemies to surrender now…
It will be worse because Whites are now on the losing side.
So right you are. Losing. Ah, joyfully losing the dead weight of the BLM, Antifa, liberal progressive blacks and mud sharks. Enjoy your fantasy Mr/Mrs/Ms/It ? Mike Ricci. That too will end.
Edomite (Jew) quote – “We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tension by propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the whites. We can mold them to the program of the communist party. In America we will aim for subtle victory while inflaming the negro minority against the whites. We will instill into the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the negro. We will aid the negro’s rise to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and will begin a process which will deliver America into our cause.” Israel Cohen – head of the communist party in England “A Racial Program For The Twentieth Century” (1912) Congressional Record, Vol. 103, p. 8559, June 7, 1957.
All these words, written directly into the Congressional Record, and still no one believes such things could happen or that Jews would instigate another race to attack White people. Nor do people hear of, or believe the stories of massacres and cannibalism that were witnessed by many of the White explorers landing on unknown shores and witnessing these things firsthand. Keep writing — and searching for the truth — and posting it.
“basic ingregients of the Mexican diet ….
In pre-Hispanic times, one type of “tamal” (made of crushed maize and wrapped in a maize husk) was filled with human flesh, but after the [Spanish] Conquest pork was used.”
from Mexico: Biography of Power, A History of Modern Mexico, 1810-1996, Enrique Krauze, paperback ed, 1997, p 57.
Well I for one am looking forward to the human flesh tamals being available once again, maybe at Taco Bell. These will come as the POC’s determine the trajectory of civilization in the previously USA lands.
Soylent Green tamales are coming back? Oh boy, I can hardly wait!
The proper response to criticism of Columbus, Cortez, Clive, Custer, et alia ought to be: “Yes, these White warriors subjugated ‘indigenous peoples’…and anti-Whites should think about it because White peoples did it before and can do it again!”
The objective of the attack on Columbus et alia has little to do with real or imagined atrocities. It’s a form of psychological warfare to demoralize White people who, for whatever reasons, are vulnerable to guilt trips these decadent days. What White advocates need to do is regain the psychological highground.
Let’s note that the Left has little problem in making heroes out of a Che or Trotsky or Mao or Lumumba or Mandela, terrorists responsible for more than their share of mayhem (including reviving slavery in the 20th century in the form of the gulag). Look at the worldwide rioting precipitated by the current round of BLM/Leftist violence. When it comes to their own “Birth of a Nation,” the Left (really its globalist string pullers) shows no hesitation about engaging in looting, arson, iconoclasm, assorted killings and population replacement.
Two things are happening here:
1) White people are being morally disarmed so they can not defend themselves against the ongoing insurrections and invasions.
2) Anti-Whites are abrogating to themselves the right to use all forms of violence to engage in those same insurrections and invasions.
There was a time when the BLM/Leftist “uprising” would have been met with a hail of bullets (this is why the police used to call shotguns “riot guns”) and impromptu White defense in the form of organized vigilantes (see the reaction of Whites to the 1921 black insurrection in Tulsa). And if the critics claim that Tulsa was an example of a “massacre” of “people of color” then perhaps (again) they ought to think about this before they push White people too far today.
Consider how Cortez with a thousand or so White soldiers brought down the mighty Aztec Empire. Or how small numbers of White soldiers could conquer just about all of Africa in the 19th century. Or how an Ian Smith could lead the White minority of Rhodesia in a successful defense of their country for a decade and a half against the entire world. Or how a White teenager in Kenosha could throw the Left into hysterics because he dared pull the trigger on anti-White insurrectionists who attacked him.
This is what the anti-Columbus movement is afraid of. When White people stand up and fight, nothing can stop them.
Seize the psychological highground. Let’s see Whites stand up and claim Columbus precisely because he was a great and ruthless warrior, and give warning to the world: mess with White people at your own hazard.
Something to think about in the continuing chaos…