Boris Johnson
798 words
“The more it changes, the more it’s the same thing”—Jean-Baptiste Karr, Les Guepes (The Wasps), 1849
You can call me a cynic but I think I have lived through this situation before. I have no previous experience of precognition and can make no claims to being a prophet, but something tells me I know how this will all play out.
The parallels are almost uncanny. Let me count the ways. Firstly, there is a national crisis. Then it was a 3-day week and public sector strikes that prevented the bereaved burying their dead. Today it is Brexit and the talk of reversing the outcome of the referendum to leave the European Union. Secondly, there was an unelectable and deeply unpopular Labour Party matched up against a resurgent Conservative Party led by a charismatic, if slightly idiosyncratic leader, surrounded by alien ideological and cultural influences – does that sound familiar? Thirdly, there was an insurgent party. Then it was the National Front, and today it is the Brexit Party – two extremely different challenges to the mainstream consortium of Lib-Lab-Con, with the former offering a vision of a racial nationalist future, while the latter, arguably a controlled opposition, offering a civic nationalist proposition at best – with both ending in catastrophe – and finally, and possibly even more telling of the synchronicity between 1979 and 2019 – there was a clear signaling by the Prime Minister to be that cutting immigration was a core policy that the new government would adopt the moment they took office.
Four decades and numerous red and blue rosette swathed administrations later and I am still waiting for the last promise to be fulfilled. Despite nearly every single campaign run by both parties at every subsequent general election acknowledging the ongoing concerns of the indigenous British about being “swamped” by people from very different backgrounds and cultures the Westminster regime as merely paid lip-service to the electorate while actively opening our borders – from a Conservative viewpoint to enlarge the pool of cheap workers – and from the Left-wing Labour perspective to fundamentally change the nation’s demographic make-up. Thus creating an entirely new polis, through a process now known as “The Great Replacement” and with whom they intend to install their own permanent political hegemony.
Both policies, in their own divergent ways, resulting in a perfect storm of economic, cultural and societal dissolution that has scarred the nation from Land’s End to John o’Groats. A social engineering project that has created a Mary Shelley-like Frankenstein out of a potential Apollo. A bow-legged cripple out of an Olympic contender. Reducing the industrial and manufacturing base upon which a real economy thrives to a derivatives dependent financial services sector that can be transplanted to any location on the face of the earth. A micro-climate economy buffeted by the gales of the global market, fanned in turns by the hucksters that pass for gurus in today’s celebrity game show panel line-ups – a pantomime of entrepreneurs queuing up to deliver their catch-phrase gimmicks on prime-time TV like The Apprentice and Dragon’s Den.
Dreadful non-entities who masquerade as expert advisers to ministers who are in truth only fit to be bank clerks in small provincial towns. Men and women with the ideological vision of a velvet coated mole. Creatures that will sell-snake oil to get elected because it means recognition. A craving deeply imbued from cradle to grave by 1000s of mindless network newsrooms that insist everyone is equal and all have a right to be heard. Journalists of yesteryear like Robin Day – and now the self-aggrandizing, Laura Kuenssberg — giving air-time to the deluded – people of the past like Labour’s Neil Kinnock or the Conservative’s Matthew Parris and now – Jo Swinson and Anna Soubry; the dangerous – then, like Labour’s Jack Shaw and the Conservative’s Keith Joseph and now – Labour’s Naz Shah, Sadiq Khan, and Change UK’s Chuka Umunna.
Creatures truly unfit to occupy high office but emerge through the slime sift of today’s party system — which is geared to select mediocrity — to walk the corridors of power. Casting their inconsequential shadows on the marble statues and portraiture of giant personalities from our country’s glorious history like Burke, Salisbury, Palmerston. and Gladstone.
Thatcher back in 1979 parroting Saint Francis of Assisi as she entered Downing Street, saying – “Where there is discord, may we bring harmony. Where there is error, may we bring truth. Where there is doubt, may we bring faith. And where there is despair, may we bring hope” – While Johnson declaims from the steps of Number 10, in 2019: “Let the healing begin.” And my reply to both, then as now — that can only be achieved when repatriation commences and to use an image from that great English satirist of yore, Jonathan Swift, the parliamentary stables are truly cleaned. Plus ca change, Plus c’est la meme chose.
23 comments
True. Unless the demographics are reversed, it is as superficial a change as was Trump’s election.
I have some English acquaintances who are, amazingly, orthodox Anglicans. They rail against things like transgenders and women in the clergy and against gay marriage and even sometimes, when they are brave, against “certain forms” of Islam.
I have made myself unwelcome to them by saying this: “You have taken a Black African from Uganda and made him Archbishop of York and expected everyone to accept this bizarre destruction of identity and boundaries. And then you are amazed when the same church thinks that people with vaginas can be vicars and two men can be married? Do you not see the connection?”
They, of course, were horrified. Not by the facts, but by my saying them. And they will lose everything, Boris or not, for having worshipped the Trojan horse of race equality and believing six other impossible things before breakfast, too.
Alas. It was a great, great civilization.
Dear Dr ExCathedra,
You hit the nail on the head with the reference to the incumbent in York Minster – a buffoon much better suited to a PG Tips advert
Best
FS
….for having worshipped the Trojan horse of race equality and believing six other impossible things before breakfast, too.
“The most common of all follies is to believe passionately in the palpably not true. It is the chief occupation of mankind.” –H. L. Mencken—
Dear Ovidiu,
It is the same process in EVERY Western country – UK, USA, Canada, Australia, NZ and Europe. It is only (so far) the former Eastern Bloc countries that hold out against the psychological infection the perpetrators of the ‘falsehood of equality’ spread wherever they go – like a mirage – in advance of their rapidly advancing dusky army.
Best
FS
I didn’t realise the Tories had pledged to cut immigration. I’d have voted for them if I’d known.
Dear Adrian,
The Tories ALWAYS promise that they will cut immigration one in some shape or form and NEVER deliver!
Best
FS
Boris will do as his Puppeteers in Jerusalem command. He’s a good goy.
Remember he wrote a biography about Churchill and will nog have missed how Churchill sold his soul just like Judas.
Dear Captain John,
Correct! I can already hear the strings being stretched and the tune of the Lonely Goatherd from The Sound of Music movie soundtrack
Best
FS
Both Churchill and Johnson were/are at least partly biologically Jewish.
Churchill’s mother Jenny Jerome was an adulterous Jewess remember. And I have heard it said that Johnson has some Jewish antecedents.
Dear Martin,
I think you are correct – there are some biological/racial similarities in the antecedents of both Johnson/Churchill
Best
FS
Why did Churchill make a number of ostensibly anti-Semitic observations, such as about the huge Jewish presence in the international Bolshevist movement?
Dear Lord Shang,
Political gain – prior to him becoming financially indebted to The Focus!
Best
FS
Lord Shang: Correct. On November 5, 1919, two years after the Russian Revolution and at the time when the world furor about it was perhaps at its height, Winston Churchill made a speech before the House of Commons, in which he said:
“Certainly I dispute the title of the Bolsheviks to represent Russia. . . They despise such commonplaces as nationality. . . No sooner did Lenin arrive than he began by beckoning a finger here and a finger there to obscure persons in sheltered retreats in New York, in Glasgow, in Berne, and other countries, and he gathered together the leading spirits of a formidable sect, the most formidable sect in the world, of which he was the high priest and chief. With these spirits around him he set to work with demoniacal ability to tear to pieces every institution on which the Russian State depended. Russia was laid low.”
A few months later, in a front-page article published in the Illustrated Sunday Herald (London), February 8, 1920, he wrote to the same effect but went into greater detail.
“This movement among the Jews [the Russian Revolution of 1917] is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kuhn [Cohen] (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstruction of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster (author of World Revolution) has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. . . the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders.”
Then, after being out of political power for about a decade, and rumored to have been in financial distress, Churchill was said to have visited in the early 1930s the USA, specifically NY City and to have stayed in the private home of Big Jew Bernard Baruch. After his short visit, he returned to the UK, had no further financial/money problems, his family estate was still solidly in his hands, he had plenty of money for campaigning for Parliament, promptly won a seat in The Commons, and was a fervent internationalist from then on; i.e. bolshevik USSR good guys, Germany/Hitler bad guys. Go figure.
The first thing for Britain to do is the same that America must do: remove private control of the money supply. Why? First, because the private bank/money power mercilessly grinds the native people (Whitesin both the UK and USA) into poverty, or near poverty. These native peoples will most likely, when faced with poverty, NOT be concerned with anything else until that is relieved. This is just simply the way most of those people are.
Second, the control of mass media is being run by the same said money power ((( racial aliens))) in both countries and, just as important, the proceeds (wealth of the native people) is being raked off and used in activities to obliterate the demographic majority of said native peoples.
Third, these ((( racial aliens ))) need to be expelled wholesale. No exceptions allowed. When one is infected with a virus, each virus cell must be removed or the virus will reproduce and then one day it will infect again.
This expulsion has been done over 100 times over the course of several millennia. It can be done again. As for England: no jews allowed for about 350 years, from Edward I to Charles I. There was a good reason why that period was referred to as Merrie Ole England, and England has gone downhill since Cromwell. All White, Gentile, Aryan peoples on their own have done wonderful until they come into contact with the jews. Then, it’s downhill.
precisely
I’ll take that bet.
Looking at all this from afar, I wonder if Labour now, after the election, appears more visibly non-white than it did a week ago. If it does, that surely must be good.
On an emotional level, I was hoping that Britain’s most obnoxious negro – David Lammy – had gone down in the Conservative landslide. I checked, and discovered that he had easily coasted to victory in Tottenham.
The worst is sometimes better. The most offensive non-white Labour MPs, it seems to me, help push right-leaning British voters toward some kind of serious ethnonationalism, so (thinking more rationally) I hope they survived their party’s disaster.
Dear Irmin,
Lammy is indeed a noxious individual – but in his idiocy (much like Abbot) a useful reference point for the likes of us. There is a whole new generation of ethnic self-servers coming through – but this time they’ll be hiding (like before) behind a Blair-like character NOT a Corbyn-type. Which is far more dangerous.
Best
FS
And that, ladies and gentleman, is why I moved from London to the Third World four years ago. It is terrible to watch a loved one die.
Dear Dr. Gullick,
You could have saved yourself the upheaval – the Third World came to London (and Leicester, Liverpool, Birmingham, Bradford, Manchester and Leeds).
Best Wishes
FS
I agree with the OP.
But I can sum it up in a one liner:
>Imagine voting your way out of enslavement.
You guys hear what’s been happening in Virginia? Re: 2nd A.
One thing that does stand out from the Comment blog of the Guardian newspaper is a sense of revulsion at the constant nagging and scolding of ordinary Britons by the ideologues of the Left and their hapless proxies in Corbyn’s Shadow Cabinet.
No one has gone so far as to explicitly challenge the implicit anti-white agenda of much left discourse, but it is clear that the usual litany of denunciations: racist, fascist, mysogynist and now transphobic, has begun to grate on the public.
Diane Abbott, Corbyn’s dyscalculic BAME(*) Shadow Home Secretary will also have alarmed voters by giving every indication that she wished to make inward migration to Britain easier.
The upshot is that all of these inept and insufferable ‘progressive’ types have just received a ‘two-fingered’ salute from the electorate. Whether it amounts to more than that remains to be seen.
(*) Black And Minority Ethnic.
Dear Vehmgericht,
A very accurate analysis – the ‘real’ British are absolutely fed up with BAME/WOKE/SJW’s et al. We want the Guardinastas shut down and talentless ethnics removed from our news media and entertainment channels- and that is just the start of my wish-list for Christmas !!!
Best Wishes
FS
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.