Counter-Currents
1,093 words
What a relief. Donald Trump has won. The Republicans have won. The American people have won. And race-conscious whites have won.
Or did we? After all, our goal is to restore America as a white homeland. Trump’s goal, at best, is a multiracial meritocracy that is somewhat less anti-white, somewhat more color-blind, somewhat more capitalistic than what we have today. That’s actually worse than what we already have, because the only thing worse than a dysfunctional multiracial society is a functional one. Fortunately for us, there ultimately is no such thing as a workable multiracial society. Multiracial capitalism will continue to erode the racial and cultural capital our civilization is based upon. Thus events will continue to argue in our favor, as will we. Only ethnonationalism can save us.
So in what sense is this victory ours?
First, many of us took part in it. We voted. We persuaded others to vote. We volunteered. Some of us even donated to Trump (although, frankly, you should have kept your money within our movement).
Second, Trump won’t give us a white homeland. That is our job. But Trump’s victory makes it easier for us to get what we want.
- Compared to Harris, Trump is far better on immigration. Both candidates offered legal immigration. But Harris also offered massive illegal immigration and amnesties. Trump offered a clampdown on illegal immigrants coming in and mass deportations of the ones already here. Trump will slow down the Great Replacement, which buys White Nationalists time. To win, we need time.
- Compared to Harris, Trump is far better on freedom of speech. To win, we need free speech.
- Compared to Harris, Trump is far better on our freedom to politically organize. To win, we need freedom to organize.
- Compared to Harris, Trump’s economic policies are more realistic, thus Americans will enjoy more prosperity. Prosperity brings more money into our movement, and to win, we need money. Prosperity is a double-edged sword, though, because it makes white people complacent. Thus our movement needs to invest some of the dividends of prosperity into fighting complacency. We must be realistic. Our roots are on the Right, and the American Right is bourgeois to its bones. When there is an economic crisis, Leftists go all in to exploit it, but Rightists cut back on politics. Rightists want the impossible: revolution with full benefits and a nice retirement package.
- Compared to Harris, Trump is far more likely to promote peace and stability around the world. This may be a bad thing if you are an accelerationist. (Of course most of our accelerationists are phonies who would hit the brakes when anything threatens the geopolitical interests of Russia, China, and Iran.) I prefer peace and stability. If you think Peanut the squirrel was an intolerable distraction to our politics, imagine World War III. A war, for instance, would be a lot bigger distraction than Covid, from which our organizing has still not fully recovered.
- Compared to Harris, Trump will dial back anti-white “DEI” policies. In fact, Trump’s victory may be a sign that the tide of wokeness is ebbing. This provides us with enormous opportunities. The weaker our enemies are, the more likely we are to beat them.
- Trump’s victory will complete the destruction of the Republican Party of the Bushes, the Cheneys, and the neocons, opening the way for a more nationalist and populist Right. That provides us with opportunities.
So what should we be doing in the second Trump administration?
First, we must continue the battle of ideas. The mainstream is closer to us for two reasons. First, the consequences of multiculturalism and globalization are pushing people toward us. Second, our arguments and memes are pulling people toward us. Political change happens after you convince people to think that it is possible, necessary, and good. The more people who believe that white identity politics is inevitable, necessary, and moral, the more likely we are to win.
- One important front is to dismantle the multiracial colorblind meritocratic model defended by people like Christopher Rufo and Richard Hanania, which is now the main impediment on the Right to embracing white identity politics.
- Another important front will be immigration. The establishment will counter Trump’s deportation plan with every sophistry in the book. We need to be there dismantling every bad argument and exploding every bogus statistic. It is very sad that VDare won’t be in this fight. They were the natural people to lead it. But Counter-Currents will do everything we can to take up the slack. So will the Homeland Institute.
- The most important front, of course, is the moral battle. The only thing that sustains the desperate delusion of a colorblind meritocracy is the absurd dogma that identity politics is fine for every group except whites. Imagine liberating someone like Tucker Carlson or Elon Musk from that mental prison. It can happen. Once whites become comfortable taking our own side in a fight again, everything else will fall into place.
Second, race conscious whites need to organize ourselves as a political bloc. This bloc should focus on immigration, which is central to white survival. The goal is to create a political pressure group that demands pro-white immigration and emigration policies and is capable of rewarding or punishing legislators by delivering or withholding the margin of victory. In a tight race, even a tiny but well-organized bloc of swing voters can affect the outcome. Building such a bloc involves two steps.
- First, we need knowledge. How many people agree with us? Where are they located? If they are located in districts where they could swing elections, are they willing to do so? A public policy research institute could provide such data. Fortunately, I have already built one: the Homeland Institute. For a promising start, see David Zsutty’s article “The Rise of the Single-Issue Immigration Voter.” The Homeland Institute can provide the knowledge we need. All it needs from you is the money to operate.
- Second, we need a lobbying organization that could take the knowledge provided by the Homeland Institute, build an actual political movement, and then deploy it to promote legislation and candidates that advance white interests. That’s my next big project. Right now, it is merely an idea. But if you have $250,000 in seed money, get in touch with me at [email protected], and we can talk about making it real. In the meantime, I will focus on building Counter-Currents and the Homeland Institute.
Share your thoughts on the movement’s priorities for Trump’s second term in the comments below, then let’s get to work.
61 comments
It’s a fine pragmatic rundown.
I’m not enthusiastic, but agree it’s probably the better thing. I’m glad that colored lady lost. The smug arrogance of her supporters was tiring, thinking they could pass off another light skinned poc because she’s a light skinned poc, this time female as well, and we’re all supposed to gush and coo about this incredible achievement and advancement of civilization. Of course a lot of them would turn on her later if she started to get a bit unenthusiastic on Israel.
I don’t know what to make of Vance since he appeared. I’m not sure what I’m watching.
I thought the team up of RFK Jr, Gabbard and Trump was quite powerful when it happened and sent a ripple in the political cosmos. Now I tend to think Trump will dump these extras quite quickly.
I don’t know. Count our blessings I guess and try and make the best of it.
I don’t get the feeling he will dump RFK and Gabbard. I believe he will reward them for their support. They definitely are not 100% behind his platform, but I think he needs some different perspectives in his cabinet to be successful. How they contribute I don’t know, but I think they will. And he’s loyal as long as they’re loyal. Resign over differences if you must, but keep it in house instead of writing a book. Hopefully he’ll have a better class of advisors this time. The alternative, we won’t bother going there.
Well written as per usual. I hope others will take the opportunity to share this article link to people that could be ready to hear the message, and share it to various forums and social media anonymously.
I was heartened to see that this election there wasn’t a helpless ennui of people feeling their vote wouldn’t count. Even in very liberal states I think it is important to let it known there are sizable numbers of voters against the leftist agenda.
I would have preferred DeSantis, but Trump’s resilience against the ridiculous show trials, investigations, impeachment, media smears, “dossier” and even assassination attempts… are now an incredible bit of US lore. That dogged tenacity is there in our history, whether the accomplishments of Roman/British empires, or the battle of Stalingrad. Every little bit of ground gained counts… ounces eventually add up to Pounds… “A slave is one who waits for someone to come and free him”.
I don’t disagree with any of this, but if y’all are going to wait for White Jesus, then you may be waiting a while. In the meantime, be GRATEFUL for this win. Jesus H. Christ Almighty, today could have been one hell of a lot worse. Honestly, rejoice.
The folks who really run things could have stolen this election, too – but they wanted Don to win. IMO that’s because he would not hesitate to carry out the most wicked actions imaginable, where Harris would have at least paused and things could have gone either way.
Sir, this is a Wendy’s.
No, just kidding. Seek help.
An additional benefit of Trump’s immigration policy is that it will normalize deportation. For most whites, such a move with large numbers of people would be unthinkable. But making the psychological switch to thinkable, which Trump is doing, is the first step towards persuading whites that mass deportations are necessary and healthy for whites.
Mr.Quinn
Thank you so much for your awesome articles. What is the best thing we can do right now that Trump is president elect? What can White Nationalists/White Identarians do right now that will beneficial for spreading our beliefs?
Thank you so much-WA
I’m waiting to see if he pardons the January 6ers. That’ll be the main tell if trump is serious this time.
I’d bet big money that says it’s the first thing he does
I’m Donald Trump, of this you know quite well,
With plans so bold, they bring both cheers and fears.
I seek to change the course; just watch me swell,
While challengers and critics drown in tears.
For those who tread on lands I hold so dear,
I see you packing bags to just depart.
From heights of towers tall, your voice I hear,
Yet warmth and hope, I’m told, must close my heart.
But here I stand, with daring goals in sight,
A restless dreamer, breaking all the mold.
For every voice that stirs the dark of night,
I strive for dreams—both daring and so bold.
So join this ride, and see what may unfold,
In lands of freedom bright, where hearts are gold.
Hopefully, Donald Trump will become known to historians as “The Last of the Great Civic Nationalists.”
That will mean that because we were strong enough to get him elected, we were eventually able to move beyond him.
That’s a good way to put it. He’s a stepping stone to better things.
Dr. Johnson, thank you very much for your wonderful article and all the fanstatic content you have made. My question to you is what is the single best thing we can do right now since Trump has been elected? What can White Nationalists/White Identarian do right now that will beneficial for spreading our beliefs?
I am currently working with local nationalists and abroad for a type of White American community organization, it’s called the Euramerican National Assembly.
I am also a member of the American Freedom Party, and it’s one of the few White Nationalist/White Indentiarian Parties out there.
I think that we all need to share pro white material and resources through social media like Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, etc. Really get in touch with regular white folks.
The key to NOT marginalizing yourself is to advance a prowhite agenda without actually calling yourself “prowhite”. Communists advanced in the last century, at least when they did so democratically, by NOT calling themselves “communists”. Trump can advance white genetic interests by deporting tens of millions of illegal aliens; does he have to say he’s doing this because he’s prowhite (as opposed to it simply being good for “all Americans regardless of skin color’)?
White Americans are often functionally, but almost never formally, prowhite. That observation was a foundation stone of the approach to be adopted by the implicitly prowhite networking organization I tried to create three decades ago.
The key to NOT marginalizing yourself is to advance a prowhite agenda without actually calling yourself “prowhite”. Communists advanced in the last century, at least when they did so democratically, by NOT calling themselves “communists”.
I don’t think this strategy works without media control. If it quacks like a duck, the major media will call it a duck, and then what do we do? Try to prove we’re not ducks by supporting anti-duck policy, I expect.
I would go a step further and say we can apply this to race mixing; I am for women’s wrights so you should marry outside of your race due to the fact that physical abuse is always rife.
The basic race issue is the most important issue. This issue is biological domination of vital habitat. Donald Trump read Ann Coulter’s book and raised this vital issue, which is what won him the presidency. But then there was not enough wall-building. Obviously we need a remigration agenda, but it has to be pushed independently and not routed through President Trump. Expecting President Trump to follow through adequately on this issue is a path to bitterness.
There is a rule of leadership that has almost certainly existed before the human race in its present forms evolved. The leader protects his followers from hostile tribes. Donald Trump does not follow this primal rule. He should have pardoned the J6 protesters. He didn’t. He should have fought for freedom of speech on the Internet, which was vital for his boosters. He didn’t. There are many ways he failed. Again, we should call for this but we know Trump’s record.
The leader should also protect the way of life of his people. He should protect them from impoverishment and economic subordination. This would be a natural role for Donald Trump, who aspired to be a “jobs” president. DIE means that young White males are being reduced to helots. Donald Trump should do everything he can to counter that. He should be a “jobs for White men” president. Donald Trump’s record is that he refused to acknowledge the existence and the economic needs of Whites.
I think we have at least three good issues: land, speech, jobs. We don’t have a man in the Oval Office with a record of being willing to act on these vital issues but advocacy has to go on anyway.
imagine World War III
It is already going on. I only hope that the US will not again “defend” the ungrateful Jewropeans and fight for them, while they do not want to defend themselves and to fight for themselves. Jewrope will be a Chinese colony with Russian prison guard, but they are only themselves to blame for it.
This ‘jewropean’ would like you to take your anti-White rhetoric elsewhere, please. You don’t seem to have any sense of a wider White racial brotherhood, like most Russians that I have encountered. Of course, when you want sympathy and to be counted as White, you must be obliged.
He’s not a white Russian. He’s some minority.
Oh dear. That would make sense.
And where was this “White racial brotherhood” in all World wars before this one? Where it was in 1793-1815, in 1914-1918, in 1939-1945? In all three World wars the Whites have killed each others, all three wars were instigated by the same nation, just like the fourth, which is goings on now, and in two wars of them, in the 20th century, the Americans fought on the wrong side. Some (the same nation) want they do it again. I think that the American involvements in the wars in 1917, and in 1941, were a wrong solution, and also I do not think that their possible involvement in the war which is going on now would be good.
If there had been more White brotherhood in the past our race would not be undergoing White genocide now.
We are here to repair the fatal errors of the past and not to repeat them. The attitude that some White nation is always to blame for everything that goes wrong is a fatal error. The attitude that permanent bliss is near at hand provided we kill enough Jerries, Tommies, Ivans, etcetera is a fatal error. The attitude that the court Jews and other antiwhite influencers crowding about our leaders and seducing them into supporting policies of White destruction are a side-issue that we shouldn’t look into or react against is a fatal error.
Since we’re discussing an American election I’ll be more specific. The idea that White Americans should have unhelpful contempt for “ungrateful Jewropeans” is bad, very bad. The attitude that some Europeans cultivate, that stupid American cowboys are of no value and that the relevant in-group is Europeans and not Whites, is bad, very bad. This is what we need less of.
We are brothers and sisters in a great family. We will learn to love each other or we will die. In the face of evil and effective enemies who love to turn us against each other and who get us to slaughter each other there is not a third option.
You know, it is all good, but a little to idealistic. The identity of people is mostly national/ethnic, but not racial. If you ask any man, who is he, you will surely get an answer like I am an American, an Englishman, a Frenchman, a German, a Russian, an Italian, etc. I do not think that somebody will say, “I’m a White man,” maybe only when you ask him in Africa among hundreds of Black men and women.
The white racial unity is just like a horizon, you cannot reach it.
Can’t reply further down the thread, but in response to your last post. Your mentality is the same as a friend of mine who argues that white identity is simply a cope and there isn’t much there. I see it as a super-ethnos that will be forced to develop as globalization gets worse. Your mentality reflects more of the “old country”, but frankly the identity is going to have to become specifically racial. The power structure has decided that being German, French, Russian etc. just means you have a passport and these categories have been explicitly destroyed in the same way the American identity has. This will probably annoy European readers, but the fact of the matter is that we are not going to have an option otherwise.
Also, Americans just understand some things about racial dynamics that Europeans just don’t and that is everything and I mean everything becomes racial in multiracial societies. You rarely have any idea what the national identity of some brown sludge person you are talking to (he is just the other and it doesn’t matter much if he’s a Nicaraguan or a Mexican) and the same goes for others like they care what kind of white you are. If you asked a Chinese in America with an American passport, I guarantee you he would say he is an Asian-American. Always making sure to distinguish himself from others and you see this among nonwhites in Western Europe. They start operating as a bloc very fast and only when being disingenuous do they identify without the hyphen. Point being it becomes very superficial and there isn’t much way in avoiding that.
During this campaign the Republicans were able to make not insignificant inroads with the POC communities – namely Black men and Hispanics – coupling this with the cry from Trump about needing more legal immigration and the fact that there probably isn’t going to be mass deportations (though to be fair, I heard that to have the largest deportations in US history is a very low number – about 2 million or so?) I can’t help but feel that the Republicans moving on to a post-European base and embracing a multiracial coalition is more of a disaster for the pro-White cause than any positives that can be mustered from it.
The worst thing about Trump is that he actually succeeded better with the Republican minority outreach crack than the mainstream Republicans have. Of course Trump and the Republicans both feel forced to go there because they have been so morally intimidated by the dogma that only white identity politics is evil. As the Boomers die off, that attitude’s power will fade. As we educate people of all ages, that attitude will fade. As for white nationalists, we can be grateful for the help of non-white allies, but that doesn’t change the fact that we want a white homeland for ourselves.
An optimist would say that 54% of Hispanic men voting for Trump changes the incentives of mass migration; if they don’t vote Dem, why even import them?
I’m genuinely impressed by how many young white voters chose Trump over Harris. The fact that the youth are so much more right-wing these days (similar to trends in France, Sweden and Canada) really means that we have a chance to push White Identity politics hard in the years to come.
Are these young whites finding Counter-Currents and Amren or are they being entirely swayed on TikTok, X, gaming forums and 4-chan? I suspect the latter, but hope they can find their way here despite Google’s censorship efforts.
Joe Gould: November 7, 2024 The basic race issue is the most important issue. This issue is biological domination of vital habitat…
There is a rule of leadership that has almost certainly existed before the human race in its present forms evolved. The leader protects his followers from hostile tribes. Donald Trump does not follow this primal rule.
—
Thanks, Joe. That Trump prevailed over his mongrel Marxist opponent and her team is favorable in that it may buy serious White preservationists some time to get their act together, but it does not change the fact that the electoral system of mass democracy in multiracial America is absurd for choosing our leaders.
The fact is that Trump is squarely in bed with the primary enemy of our race and his loyal followers are incapable of naming that enemy.
A must read: “Let’s Talk About Donald Trump” at nationalvanguard.org
…As a matter of fact, Donald Trump is the most Jewish non-Jew I have ever come across. Just in this month of October, perhaps goaded by his Jewish son-in-law Jarod Kushner, a flaming Zionist, he has been doubling down on his fanatical devotion to Israel, his opposition to domestic Jew haters, as he calls them, and his belligerence towards Iran. His friendship with Jews, his fervent support of Israel, his warm speeches to Jewish groups, and sympathy for all the terrible things they supposedly went through – all this and more is so well-documented that even many normies know about it. Neo-con con man Mark Levin once introduced Trump as “the first Jewish president” which made Donald smile. Trump once even implied that anti-Semitism should be punishable by death. Nor does he have any problem associating with Jewish perverts…
Will this change because Trump won the election? Not likely.
Thank you very much Mr. Williams for your insights!
White American: November 8, 2024 Thank you very much Mr. Williams for your insights!
—
You’re welcome. My more radical insights are unpopular but based on the reality and experience.
Whites put Trump over the top which is good, considering the alternative, but they should get over their giddiness and quick. Trump’s victory reminds me of Reagan’s victory over Carter when that landslide victory had Whites to become complacent all through the 1980s, thinking “now everything will be all right” since we’ve now got a conservative in the White House who will turn things around.
How did that work out?
Americans still cannot see that Trump is the most Jewish non-Jew to occupy the White House. We have a couple of years now to provide White Americans answers to the JQ and let them know it’s all right to want to separate themselves from not just Jews and their influence, but from other non-Whites and from Whites who prefer the status quo. It will not be easy. It is time to become the clear-headed, uncompromising minority on the JQ.
Deporting 20,000,000 non-Whites is practically a pipe dream when comparing to Operation Wetback that supposedly deported 1,000,000 in racially healthier 1954 under Eisenhower.
We’re not talking about the non-Mestizo Rubios and Cruzes that are assimilable, but if they have non-White dependents, that should be a consideration when looking at preservation of the White race. Will they be welcomed into a White separatist community or will they remain in their outgroup? The line must be drawn somewhere.
More than bush2? I have a strong feeling at least Trump will keep us from getting into a boots in the ground hot war during his presidency. I could see more some thing like desert storm, perhaps.
but that’s the Faustian bargain(literally, lol) a conservative has to make to get into power these days. But that’s what this whole discussion thread is about. We’re learning to compromise, learning what Beltway Republicans knew all along.
“Bow down before the one you serve!
you’re going to get what you deserve!”
Trent Reznor
Strike while the iron is hot.
Hollywood and the mainstream media are tottering.
Now is the time to give them a push.
Cancel your cable TV subscription, cancel your mainstream media subscriptions, stop going to the movies and stop renting movies.
I always find myself thinking in terms of elevator speeches and painting walls, so to speak.
My elevator-speech answer to the question “How did you vote?” is “I voted for the candidate I believe will move us farther from globalism and closer to nationalism, in this case, Trump.”
That’s a “first coat of paint.” A second would be an article like this one; to the inevitable follow-up question, “What do you mean?” this is a perfect forward (if you’re so inclined) or set of talking points to remember and share in conversation.
The modern attention span (short) needs curt, small bites, broad, then incrementally specific. To that end…
Movement priority one, IMHO, is to mainstream the message.
That means putting away the accoutrements and terminology that scare away the average person, while at the same time being unambiguously forthright about our pro-white stance.
Not to be crass, but think of it like a date. You don’t go out with a woman, then thirty minutes into it frustratedly yell at her from across the table, “ARE WE EVER GONNA HAVE SEX, OR NOT?!?!”
Mainstream the message. Immediate gratification in the form of ready-made perfect racists is just not in the cards, and we’ve got to get mature enough, and serious enough about the mission, to accept that, then adjust tactics accordingly.
Mr. Kirkpatrick thank you so much for your awesome articles that you written in the past. What is the best thing we can do right now that Trump is president elect? What can White Nationalists/White Identarian do right now that will beneficial for spreading our beliefs?
I am currently working with local nationalists and abroad for a type of White American community organization, it’s called the Euramerican National Assembly.
I am also a member of the American Freedom Party, and it’s one of the few White Nationalist/White Indentiarian Parties out there.
That depends on your position in life, but there are some memes that virtually everyone can and should spread:
1. White men showing up on election day are responsible for Trump’s victory.
2. Trump’s victory means that we are past “peak woke.” We need to project future momentum on our side, future decline on the Left’s side.
3. Nobody should believe the mainstream media anymore. They were wrong about everything.
4. The Democrats were willing to put an affirmative action fraud who plagiarized and slept her way to the top in the highest office of the land. That is breathtakingly irresponsible. Nobody should take them seriously as a party ever again.
Beyond that, support our institutions and activists.
Thank you very much Dr. Johnson for your wonderful feedback! What would you recommend for attempting to advance the concept of the Ethnostate in the Republican Party? Should we capitalize on neighborhood safety, or concepts related to community wellbeing? What do you think?
Hi, White American. I’m glad you’re getting out there and getting active!
And I appreciate the kind words, but I’m sorry to disappoint: you’re looking for the illustrious Kevin DeAnna (who sometimes writes under the pseudonym James Kirkpatrick). I am but a lowly office worker.
Thank you so much James for your comment!
The decisions made by Trump’s transition team in the next 2 months will determine the future of America.
The president of the United States appoints 4,000 high level officials in the executive branch. 2,800 of them are appointed purely at the president’s discretion, while 1,200 of them require congressional approval.
Will the appointees be “Tucker Carlson Republicans” – American patriots (nativist, isolationist, constitutionalist) and cultural conservatives (pro-White, Christian)?
Or will they be “Jared Kushner Republicans” who cynically appeal to American patriots and Christian conservatives during the campaign, but have only 3 priorities in office – wars for Israel, tax cuts for billionaires, and deregulation for Wall Street.
If the latter are Trump’s appointees, then the Republicans Party hasn’t changed at all. “Border Security” and “Peace” have simply replaced “Family Values” as the preferred empty slogan.
What can we do to ensure that Trump’s transition team selects patriots who share the priorities of Trump’s base, not moles who share the priorities of Big Donors?
That is the most important political question we have ever faced.
Organize. Organize. Organize.
I’m convinced that deep down inside Tucker Carlson is on our side. I listened to his podcast with a fella named Chris Moritz. The topic was the demise of California. They both talked about Anarcho Tyranny. The deliberate destruction of white communities. The Great Replacement and how our elites are no longer Christian and have no sense of morality and decency towards the people.
It was a great show. We can only hope that Elon Musk sees it our way as well.
Elon posts so often that it’s easy to lose track of some of the based things he’s said. He’s retweeted Keith Woods as well as DataHazard both on race/IQ and race/crime. I think both Tucker and Elon are doing exactly the right thing in top-toeing around the sweet spot between acceptable and radical arguments
Looks like my comment got the most likes in this thread. Just observing.
Yes, the January 6th issue is crucial. Removing masses of invaders, even if he tries hard to do it, will provoke hysterically massive resistance. But presidential pardons are really well within his executive powers alone. That he must do.
I note that one of the likes was by you. Is manipulating vote counting allowed? I thought that was for the Democrats use. Disallowing your like would then tie you with Spencer Quinn’s comment (No. 5) with the most likes, at least at this time. Just observing.
Your clarity of thought and stability of character are a great gift to our people. Helps to keep the boat afloat and on course.
Thanks so much.
A top goal should be to assure as many people as possible that it’s perfectly legitimate and sensible to expect our leaders to cut overall immigration levels. The average Republican voter must become comfortable saying, “legal immigration can be a bad thing.”
Unlike UK and Australian (and maybe Canadian) politicians, American politicians never cite, let alone promise to reduce, overall immigration numbers when trying to win over voters. This needs to change. Even hearing, “we appreciate our legal immigrants, but when the immigration numbers are too high it hurts Americans,” would be a step in the right direction.
There are many compelling arguments (eg, such as those related to jobs, sustainability, housing, etc) for reducing overall immigration that have nothing to do with importing voters or crime or illegal border crossings, and many Republican voters would respond well to them. Even a good number of Democrats and non-white voters would be open to many of the arguments. Unfortunately, they rarely hear these arguments from prominent commentators or politicians. Familiar MAGA positions referencing illegal alien crime and warning of Dem efforts to import a new electorate to overwhelm and replace Republican votes are good and necessary, but they’re not enough. Too many people only think of illegals and open borders when considering their political views about immigration. This is a problem. And even if they’re asked specifically about “legal” immigration, too many voters believe the only acceptable, respectable and obvious response is to sing the praises of “legal” immigrants who “did it the right way,” as if the issue were settled. There’s no reason why immigration restrictionist positions should be treated as fringe or taboo any longer.
People must be reassured that it’s okay to want immigration numbers reduced and to say it out loud. They shouldn’t accept any politician who refuses to pledge to reduce overall immigration. Of course, reaching a point where more people are able to honestly debate and identify the effects of racial/cultural diversity would be ideal, but short of that there’s a lot of progress that can be made in normalizing questioning conventional assumptions about immigration.
Related to this, I strongly recommend that everyone watch and share the excellent Jared Taylor/AmRen video “America is Not a Nation of Immigrants.”
Trust my 52 years of experience as an activist in American political system over a variety of issues and candidates: do not waive the white white nationalist or white supremacist flag in any of your activities in pushing forward your agenda.
Trust my 52 years of experience as an activist in American political system over a variety of issues and candidates: do not waive the white white nationalist or white supremacist flag in any of your activities in pushing forward your agenda.
Focus on meritocracy, the unfairness and unconstitutionality of affirmative action, DEI and CRT.
“Trust my 52 years of experience as an activist in American political system over a variety of issues and candidates: do not waive the white white nationalist or white supremacist flag in any of your activities in pushing forward your agenda.”
I do not trust your 52 years as an activist in the American political system.
We are trying to secure the survival of our race despite an antiwhite system that is trying to end us.
Our evil antiwhite enemies call securing the minimum conditions of White survival “white supremacy” as though we were mad aggressors bent on domination instead of as we are rational people wisely resisting an agenda of colonization and antiwhite racial destruction. They (antiwhites) howl as though they were the victims of colonialist Whites trying to create mixed-race states in which Whites would kick non-Whites around when really we want nothing more than separation, and they are the ones colonizing and destroying us.
In the face of this unending torrent of antiwhite propaganda backed by antiwhite policies we have to advocate for our race. We have to do this explicitly, because dog-whistling and implicit Whiteness are nothing but strategies of pandering and betrayal, as generations of political failure have proved.
We have to advocate for Whites as Whites. That is life and death.
Do you want to achieve your goals?
Or would you rather be hoisted on your own petard?
anything anything that reeks or suggests of white nationalism, white supremacy, neo-Nazism, or KKK (which is their branding Of anyone to the right of Knut Gingrich) will be demonized, marginalized, neutralized, and fully discounted.
surely you are aware that in America, being branded as a racist places you below child molesters in the social hierarchy. That emasculates your political efforts, and assures that your goals will be thwarted.
follow the branding of Realpolitik.
take the pass that achieves your goals
Respectfully, I’ll have to say that we as a society need to get past the notion that Whites have no legitimate interests, representatives, organizations, or right to sovereignty – quite unlike all other races, of course. Somehow we bought into that frame back in the 1960s, and ever since then, mainstream conservatives have been tiptoeing around the real issues and getting nowhere with it. Fortunately, rotten double standards are indefensible, and the time is ripe to push back against it.
Joe Gould: November 10, 2024: I do not trust your 52 years as an activist in the American political system.
—
Joe, Mr. Anderson is a moral coward with his 52 years of moral cowardice. He trusts the failed electoral system of multiracial mass democracy — therefore has no business in our ranks, advising serious racial nationalists to not “wave the white (sic) supremacist flag.” We have plenty of White women with more courage than he.
In fact, on this Veterans Day when the physical courage of millions of male combatants in America’s far-flung military adventures is celebrated, where is their moral courage to stand up and declare their dedication and commitment to for the survival, preservation and advancement of their race?
I hear crickets from them and from those Whites who celebrate them. They are incapable of even naming our enemies for fear of the smear: “Fear of the Smear” at nationalvanguard.org.
Moral courage is rare but of much more value to us in our struggle than is physical courage. I salute you whether you are a veteran of the military, or not.
—
Our evil antiwhite enemies call securing the minimum conditions of White survival “white supremacy”… when really we want nothing more than separation, and they are the ones… destroying us… We have to advocate for Whites as Whites. That is life and death.
—
Common sense asks how can those Whites who are determined to separate from Jews, other races, mongrels and their influences over us somehow want to be supreme over them? What an absurd statement! Fuck DM’s white flag of white [sic] supremacy.
The election of Trump is a good thing for Canada. V.P. Vance will be the next president and with his Hindu wife the fact that Canada’s PM sports a Hindu bracelet, the Kalawa, could reinvigorate our relationship with our largest trading partner. https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/justin-trudeau-wrist-red-threads
Read this article while sitting in a hospital for 3 hours. Great reading. Greg is witty and correct, as usual.
A reader from East-Central Europe here. Is there any chance that Donald Trump could withdraw funding for globalist, anti-white and woke projects abroad? Few Americans are aware how much American public money flows to various NGOs and international organizations that in turn support liberal anti-white propaganda everywhere. A whole army of globalist, “antiracist” and woke journalists, politicians, academics and activist are financed that way.
He could, if he knew what was going on. I have a feeling he doesn’t have any idea about this. Someone with his ear would need to clue him in about it.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.