The Counter-Currents 2016 Fundraiser
Update & Thanks

1 comment

1. Erik says:

   November 2, 2016 at 11:59 pm

   To what degree is the Dept. of State, or whomever are the agents who make visa grant decisions buffered from changes in the presidency, as well as presidential appointments? If the agencies responsible for making immigrant naturalization decisions are, in fact, buffered from direct changes in the presidency, then that may mean that a Trump victory may not have as much impact on individual immigration case decisions and/or the civil servants employed and empowered in these roles. A Trump victory would then need to rely on statutory law in order to affect changes / impose conditions onto the choices made by civil servant staffers. The question then becomes, to what degree are civil servants who are empowered to collectively make immigration case decisions, independent of the president and presidential appointments? Then, further, who are the kinds of individuals who are hired as civil servants? What are the kind of people who both elect to work in these agencies, and who are also selected to be employed by these agencies, and to what degree is this process independent of presidential administrations? For instance, the most important agency or agencies that have the authority to make immigration & naturalization case decisions may be overwhelmingly staffed by those social groups with the most to gain or interest in immigration, for instance, Latinos, or otherwise pro-immigrant proponents. These agencies may be co-opted before, during, and independent of a Trump presidency, and only if Trump could pass new statutory laws that curtail civil servants’ discretion (esp. if these civil servants have a selected-for immigrant bias). Yet, with such a tight victory for a possible Trump presidency, it thus becomes dubious how much statutory law Trump could actually get passed on this divisive issue of rights and claims to America; against the often immigrant-promulgated “American Dream”, and rather for efforts to exclude and protect a remaining majority, White, interests. Thus, a Trump victory may not actually produce significant curtailments to immigration; the less so, the less these agencies and their staffers are buffered from changes in the presidency. Therefore, changing the broader society / demographics, and taking back these agencies, actually becomes as important for trying to maintain some semblance of a White America, beyond a mere Trump victory only. Obviously a Trump victory is crucial, but it may not result in as much as it’s most ardent supports wax about. Thus, in sum, White people may have already lost the battle for change via electoral college / the most obvious political process mechanisms, and Whites would need to focus on alternative strategies and efforts beyond lobbying only.

   Hence, WhiteAmericaEugenicsSociety.org

   We need to win the culture war, to revitalize a pro-White Identity, to yield more White talent and fiscal resources for our movement, to then begin to win the demographic/ race war, and then finally again the institutions of governance.

   And, Greg Johnson needs to add Google Wallet as a payment option on the Donations page, because Google does not charge any transaction fee whereas PayPal retains 3% of all transaction revenues; and our movement doesn’t need to give our minimal resources to others not targeted/desired.

   0

   0

Comments are closed.