Replacement Migration and Hypergamy

1,484 words

Note: This text is based on an address given November 2016 in Washington, DC.

Many of you have probably seen my byline but may not know me by sight. I write a lot about relations between men and women. Sometimes men in nationalist movements fail to appreciate the relevance of this subject to our political struggle as a people. Women don’t usually have that problem. They know that they control the perpetuation of our race, and in the final analysis, that’s almost all that matters. Feminists like to say that the personal is political, and on this point at least, they are correct: our political cause depends on stable marriages and families.

I would like to begin by drawing your attention to an article published in a Norwegian newspaper three and a half years ago. Some of you may remember the flurry of discussion it occasioned at the time. The article appeared in one of the few Norwegian publications not dependent on government subsidies, and therefore free to tell the truth about the situation in that country. It was based on interviews with two young men from Groruddalen, a suburban area outside Oslo that has enjoyed more cultural enrichment than any other place in that country, mostly from Pakistani and Somali Muslims. The two young men reflect on the challenges of coming to manhood in such an environment.

They report that there is a clear hierarchy among the local boys, and native Norwegians are at the bottom of it. They are often physically attacked by the immigrant boys in the local schools. Authority figures such as teachers tell the Norwegian boys never to retaliate, even when punched. The immigrant boys are to be pitied, they are told, because they come from countries which have suffered from war—even though some are third-generation immigrants by now.

The young Muslims are quick to perceive their inviolability, of course, and take full advantage of it. As one of the interviewees put it, “they talk about respect, but they don’t show any.” They have various contemptuous slang terms for their Norwegian peers, such as “whitey” and “potato.” They stare aggressively at them on the streets, and the Norwegian boys must lower their gaze first if they do not want to face an unequal fight there and then.

And the fights are always unequal. The European concept of a “fair fight” does not exist in the Muslim mind. “If you meet them alone,” said one interviewee, “they are cowards.” They travel and hunt in packs like dogs, and only attack the natives where they enjoy a clear superiority of force. Seven or eight against one is not uncommon. Furthermore, practically all of these boys dispose of large family networks: brothers, uncles, cousins who are glad to help them avenge any perceived slights. Most of the Norwegian boys, on the other hand, are children of divorce living with their mothers. Because of the low native birth rate, a majority do not even have any male siblings.

Seeing themselves on the bottom of the local totem pole, some of these Norwegian boys have actually begun to mimic the grammatical mistakes and limited vocabulary of the immigrant boys in an effort to raise their status. A handful have actually converted to Islam. But the most interesting part of this article to me is one interviewee’s description of the sexual consequences of this social experiment as described by one of the interviewees. The Muslim boys, he says, can

chase Norwegian girls, but we cannot go after theirs. It’s something you learn early on. You just don’t go after a Pakistani girl, but Norwegian girls are available to immigrant boys. Norwegian girls prefer them. I don’t know why. That they are tough, that they have money despite not having jobs. The girls don’t see that they fight in packs, that they are cowards. I asked my best female friend if we could get romantically involved. And she told me that I have the right personality, but the problem was that I’m Norwegian. She wants to become involved with a foreigner.

Well, that young man may not understand why Norwegian girls prefer immigrant boys, but I do: sexual behavior is not under the control of the prefrontal cortex responsible for rational thought, but the limbic system, sometimes popularly known as the “reptilian brain” since it is primitive enough that we share it with reptiles. The female’s limbic instinct is to mate with dominant men—and it does not matter how such dominance is achieved. Reptiles, after all, are even farther from grasping the concept of a fair fight than Muslims. Norwegian girls either do not perceive or are unconcerned that their male peers face overwhelming odds, that the entire political and social regime of their country has been set up as if with the specific intention of disadvantaging them at the expanse of low-IQ thugs from the slums of Karachi. All the girls see is that Norwegian boys are getting beaten up and immigrant boys are doing the beating. Their natural impulse is to mate with the beaters, not the beatees.

Speaking more generally, women are less loyal to the tribe into which they are born than are men, and there are evolutionary reasons for this. In our environment of evolutionary adaptation, our remote ancestors lived in bands of fifty to a hundred persons whose men were frequently fighting one another. To be successful in such fights, men had to practice loyalty to the other men of their own tribe. When they were successful, they took the women of the vanquished tribe for themselves. This did not generally create any problem for those women. They formed new bonds with the newly dominant men quickly and easily. When men perceive that their side is losing, they redouble their efforts; women simply switch sides. The female instinct is to subordinate all other considerations to the successful rearing of children. Loyalty to their defeated menfolk would interfere with the fulfillment of this natural imperative, so they do not usually practice it. Exceptions are possible, but uncommon enough that they deserve special mention.

One case from American history has always especially impressed me. Pretty much all the sources agree that Yankee soldiers who took part in the military occupation of the American South during reconstruction got absolutely nowhere with the local women. The wives and sisters of men who had been overwhelmingly defeated—crippled and killed in many cases—remained loyal to these men, or to their memory, even at the expense of their own reproductive success. I’m not sure anything I have read about the Lost Cause has struck me with greater admiration for the defeated South. Female loyalty to tribe is certainly possible, and I hope we will know how to honor it where it occurs. At the same time, we would be wise not to count too much upon it. As I said, our evolutionary history has given women a facility in adapting to circumstance and a natural preference for the victorious, even in the unfairest of fights.

Muslim men stick to their own women when it is time to raise a family. They will happily use Western women for physical gratification if the opportunity presents itself, but they despise them as “Norwegian whores.” This may be one reason the women are so attracted to them: the female preference for dominance in males is very deeply rooted. It does not matter that they can have no future with such men.

So the exogamous Western women generally end up alone once they hit their thirties. I hope that when the time comes, Norwegian men will find the strength not to take pity on such women. If you want to discourage undesirable behavior, nothing is more effective than total ruthlessness. It’s masculine, it’s dominant, it’s attractive, and it’s one reason Norwegian women go for immigrant men in the first place. So in this respect, if no other, European men would be wise to imitate the foreign men among whom they are forced to live with and learn to be ruthless.

Let me give you an historical analogy. It is recorded that there was once a wave of suicides by young women in ancient Athens. If this happened today, emergency hotlines would be set up and psychotherapists dispatched to counsel the girls and find out what was troubling them. Instead, the city assembly simply decreed that the naked body of the next girl to commit suicide would go on display in the Agora. It wasn’t very kind, but there were no further suicides.

Similarly, a policy of writing off women who take up with their swarthy oppressors would be one way for Western man to regain a part of his dignity. It would also be eugenic, as tending to flush disloyalty from our gene pool.