Counter-Currents
Editor’s Update
At a Special Time: Greg Johnson Talks to Joel Davis About his Debate with Keith Woods
Greg Johnson
You can buy Greg Johnson’s Toward a New Nationalism here.
135 words
1. This Saturday on Counter-Currents Radio
At a special time, Greg Johnson welcomes Australian nationalist Joel Davis to discuss the NS Question. Be sure to read:
- Keith Woods, “Why Nationalism Doesn’t Need National Socialism.”
- Joel Davis, “Why Nationalism Needs National Socialism.”
Join us at 3 PM Pacific/6 PM Eastern/11 PM Central European Time on:
- Odysee: https://odysee.com/@countercurrents/ccradio
- DLive: https://dlive.tv/Counter-Currents
- Send questions & donations to Entropy: entropystream.live/countercurrents
2. How to Help Counter-Currents
There are many ways to donate to Counter-Currents, but the easiest is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.
You can explore all your donation options on our Donate page.
Remember: those who fight for a better world live in it today.
Thank you again for your loyal readership and generous support.
Greg Johnson
Editor-in-Chief
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
7 comments
Can I have a link to that debate please?
The debate occurred in writing. I think the bulk of it can be seen at the links above. See the part that says “be sure to read”.
Dr. Martin Luther: March 14, 2025 Can I have a link to that debate please?
—
Was there a debate or just two opposed articles? Joel Davis sums up the necesssity of National Socialism for our race nicely in “Why Nationalism Needs National Socialism.”
The essence of National Socialism is the good of the nation being elevated above any individual interest. It is this total reevaluation of every aspect of social and political life according to the racial purity, spiritual unity, moral health and military strength of the nation that makes National Socialism the taking of the nationalist idea to its (ideo)logical conclusion.
In front of an audience of serious racial nationalists Davis would easily win a debate with Keith Woods. Woods wants a kinder, nicer, more respectable nationalism.
(comment moved above as a reply to Dr. Martin Luther)
I’ll try to clarify my superchat. Here is a copy of my superchat: The point that I try to make I consider important and worth some attention.
“There are about 800 cities with over 50000 inhabitants in EU. The Russians have 5580 nuclear warheads, among which 1600 are fully operational. Europe has about 500 nuclear warheads in total. Ursula von der Leyen, arguably a neo-Marxist , had the right stand recently.”
The imperial motivation will always trump the ideological one, that can be seen in any historical context in the last 2000 years.
An arguably neo-Marxist like Ursula von der Leyen, had the right stand about rearming Europe (you can see her public speech on the net), while all I hear here in this podcast are philosophical arguments. National socialism made a lot of noise, but the outcome was catastrophic for the white race after WW2. “Noise makes no good, good makes no noise”. I forgot who said that. Europe has an equivalent nuclear deterrent as India, Pakistan, or North Korea. Do you find this comforting, OK ?
Let me phrase a clear question (I thought it was clear) from the context. What’s more important than rearming Europe, including nuclear deterrent parity with Russia abd China? Your answer will be appreciated.
Europe should rearm. It should not depend on the US for its security.
Will this podcast be uploaded?
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.