Dealing with the Opioid Crisis at the Strategic Level
Morris van de CampHarry Nelson
The United States of Opioids: A Prescription for Liberating a Nation in Pain
Charleston, S. C.: ForbesBooks, 2019
See also: “Work to be Such a Man,” “Kensington,” & “Opiates for America’s Heartland”
Opioid abuse is one of the major problems affecting Americans today, and it is also a factor in the Great Replacement. In 2019 Harry Nelson, a lawyer who has experience with the legal problems stemming from this drug plague, wrote a book describing the problem from a legal perspective.
All white advocates need to be aware of the opioid epidemic. Many of our people are locked into addiction. Addicts create problems, such as when the drive for one’s next fix causes an addict to steal to get money for drugs. Many also drop out of the work force. America’s deindustrialized towns have a harder time bringing their economies back from the brink because so many addicts have lost their job skills and are stuck in a downward spiral.
The history of opioids
Opiates are a chemical compound which is naturally derived from the poppy plant. Opiates were used by humans as early as 50,000 years ago. Opiate use was likewise common in ancient Greece, Egypt, and Babylon. Opiates are useful since they kill pain, act as a sleep aid, and can treat diarrhea. Even after Islam overwhelmed Arabia, alcohol was banned there but opiates were not. Farmers in Asia still produce opiates to this day by scraping out a brown, gummy substance from the seed pod and drying it in the Sun. Harry Nelson himself writes that he has used opiates to help with sleep and has awakened feeling refreshed as a result.

Opiates come from a gummy substance that forms around the seeds of the poppy. Opiates have been used by humans since the Stone Age.
Scientists discovered the active ingredients in opiates during the nineteenth century and began synthesizing them into more potent forms which are collectively referred to as opioids. Opioids are easy and cheap to produce. Fentanyl, one of the most common opioids produced today as well as the deadliest, was developed in 1959. Opioids are likewise easy to smuggle, and given America’s deliberately opened border, they are flowing into the United States in huge quantities.
Opium was first criminalized in California in the 1850s, when whites sought to clamp down on Chinese immigrant crime. The Civil War led to a nineteenth-century opium epidemic in the United States that is forgotten today. The armies of both the North and South liberally dispensed opium to their soldiers. The Union Army alone issued ten million opium pills and 2.8 million ounces of opium powders and tinctures. Many women at the time also became addicted because they were given opiates to help ease the pain of menstrual cramps.
All recreational drugs are dangerous, but opioids are especially so. The present opioid crisis began in 1999, although deaths from opioids have always been a problem in American society. Elvis Presley, for example, died from the effects of drug use, including opioids in 1977. His daughter, the late Lisa Marie Presley, who wrote the Foreword to the book under review, became addicted to opioids herself after she was prescribed them after giving birth. Nelson writes that the first time he became aware of death from opioid use was when John Belushi infamously died of an overdose of heroin and cocaine in 1982.
There has always been a fashionable allure to opioids, especially heroin. During the nineteenth century many prominent artists and authors used these substances. Their problems soon became too big to ignore, however. President Theodore Roosevelt appointed a commissioner to deal with the problem in 1908, and shortly thereafter Congress outlawed the importation of opium for smoking.
Today, opiates are regulated by the law via classifications, or “schedules.” Schedule I drugs are those which have no medical benefit. The only opioid in this category is heroin. Schedule II drugs can be prescribed, but it is recognized that these drugs have a high risk for abuse and dependence. This includes natural opium, morphine, codeine, fentanyl, oxycodone, methadone, meperidine, and carfentanil. Schedule III drugs are of moderate risk, and buprenorphine was moved into that category in 2002. Schedule IV consists of less dangerous drugs, including Tramadol, Valium, and Xanax. The only Schedule V opioid is cough syrup containing codeine.
First responses
The first line of defense against the epidemic of opioid overdoses is the drug naloxone, which is more commonly called Narcan. It was approved in 1971 and was made into a form that can be administered nasally in 2015. Naloxone can snap a patient out of an opioid overdose immediately, thereby saving him. Receiving a dose of naloxone is an unpleasant experience for the patient, however; many vomit when awakened — and many dislike the fact they are ripped out of the bliss of a high.
Some states have allowed naloxone to be purchased over the counter. Should someone have a loved one who is addicted to opioids, having naloxone is important. Now, however, some addicts use naloxone as a safety net, and even use the drug as part of their high, so naloxone does not get to the root of the problem.
One way to do this is to break addiction altogether. This is difficult under any circumstance, and until recently insurance companies refused to cover addiction treatment. The Affordable Care Act of 2010 expanded coverage requirements, however, and in 2018, another tranche of laws was passed to expand Medicare/Medicaid coverage to addiction in rural areas and Indian reservations.
The courts have likewise permitted state governments to ignore medical privacy rules in order to track those patients who are being prescribed opioids by several doctors. The hammer of law enforcement has also been wielded, albeit with a price. While there are obvious “pill mill” clinics, in many cases doctors don’t realize how many prescriptions they are writing and are unaware of the changing rules governing opioids. Thus, they end up being beset with unexpected legal issues. Nelson has seen a number of dumbstruck medical professionals as clients who needed legal defense after the laws were changed without their knowledge.
Big Pharma
Nelson points out that the opioid crisis is unique in that it is a public health catastrophe in which the medical industry played a causative role. Nelson must frame the problem through such a vague blanket statement, however, or else his book wouldn’t have been published. Like all major social calamities from Bolshevism to the Rodney King riots, at the bottom of this crisis is the Jew.
In this case, the cause is three Jews; specifically, three brothers: Arthur (1914-1987), Mortimer (1917-2010), and Raymond (1920-2017) Sackler — all of whom were of immigrant stock. Arthur paid his way through medical school by writing advertising copy. He was highly successful in this and would go on to use the skills he learned in marketing to promote drugs.
In the late 1950s the Sackler brothers sought out a distressed pharmaceutical company that they could buy. They found Perdue Frederick, which specialized in making laxatives. They changed the company’s name to Perdue Pharma and earned major profits by using it to market the drug Valium, a sedative.
The Sacklers’ business model was to sell a drug which was addictive and gave the patient a high, but which was only loosely connected to a genuine health ailment. The company used slick marketing products and paid for junkets for doctors with the expectation that these doctors would prescribe their drugs. Valium quickly became a national scourge, with 2.8 billion pills being sold in 1978 alone. Valium was even the subject of the Rolling Stones song “Mother’s Little Helper” (1966).

A United States Senator from Tennessee, Estes Kefauver, was involved in the push to eliminate organized crime, and he recognized what the Sacklers were up to — but he was unable to stop them. Kefauver was an old-stock American with ancestors from Maryland and Virginia. He died in 1963, leaving the Jewish Sackler family free to continue to prey upon ordinary Americans.
The foundations of the opioid epidemic were laid when the hostile American political elite made neoliberalism the US’ economic policy, deindustrializing large swaths of America as a result. The industry-destroying North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) came into force in 1994, and the painkiller OxyContin was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1995. Soon, factory workers were becoming addicts.

Opioids have caused considerable excess deaths in the underemployed and economically-distressed Rust Belt as well as the Coal Belt. (Source)
The Sacklers used the same business strategy they’d pioneered with Valium with OxyContin, but the results were far worse. Most addictions start the same way: a patient is injured and given OxyContin; the patient becomes hooked; and then when he is cut off from getting OxyContin legally, he switches to heroin or another illegal form of opioid.
This problem has gripped working-class whites as well as those in upper-class occupations, such as celebrities. In 2009 Nelson received a phone call from a client who’d been one of Michael Jackson’s doctors. This client was seeking advice following Jackson’s death by drug overdose, which included opioids. Nelson reassured the doctor and then scheduled an appointment to discuss a legal strategy. The doctor didn’t show, however; he ended his own life with an opioid overdose that evening.
Between 1999 and 2016, 630,000 Americans died from drug overdoses, and nearly two-thirds of that number are related to opioids. There are also hidden deaths: Opioids constrict breathing in such a way that many who are counted as heart attack deaths are, in fact, opioid overdose deaths. Those addicts who lose their supply of prescription drugs have no trouble finding another, as there are plenty of illegal opioids on the black market, especially fentanyl, which is increasingly dominating. Fentanyl is primarily manufactured in China and Mexico and smuggled across our unguarded border.
It is surprisingly easy to notice how the opioid epidemic is a form of Jewish ethnonationalist attack. The two first places where opioid overdoses became a problem were in the Scots-Irish areas of eastern Kentucky and the Spanish-settled areas of northern New Mexico. There is well-known and -documented hostility on the part of Jews toward both groups

Northern New Mexico has been severely affected by the opioid crisis and was already an early overdose hot spot in 2000. Given that the Sackler family is Jewish, it is easy to surmise that their promotion and distribution of an addictive and deadly drug in a heavily Spanish region of the United States is a form of ethnic revenge upon those — the Spanish — who opposed Jews in the past.
Fighting back
The public began to notice the opioid epidemic by 2005, and lawsuits soon followed. The Sacklers defended themselves by hiring top-tier lawyers with political connections. One such was Rudy Giuliani. He used his prestige and connections to Perdue Pharma’s liabilities to $600 million. Despite this, Perdue Pharma was finally driven out of business in 2019.
While Perdue Pharma was an economically parasitical company, other pharmaceutical companies were likewise caught up in the response to the opioid epidemic. Some pharmacies that also sold other types of products have closed, making more innocuous drugs more difficult to acquire. As a result, America today is seeing a widespread shortage of legitimate medicines.
The deep roots of the opioid problem remain despite reforms. The main problem is the endemic unemployment that exists in many areas across the United States. Until the 1990s, factories were present in every small town in America. Since then they’ve all been destroyed by foreign competition that was empowered by free-trade agreements and other ill-considered economic deals.
Those in rural and small-town communities need to harness the teleworking revolution and establish an innovative work culture that can turn things around. This is difficult because it requires many individuals to participate in building a community that has sound spiritual and social values. Nelson doesn’t mention the Great Replacement or the anti-white “civil rights” laws, but he does mention the book Bowling Alone (2000) by Robert Putnam, which showed that diversity decreases social trust and isolates individuals. Eliminating the “civil rights” regime and aligning America’s foreign and military policies with the interests of the American Majority will go a long way towards restoring sound spiritual and social values across the country.
Nelson recommends that the opioid crisis be dealt with at the strategic level. Addiction treatments must be funded by insurance companies as well as the state and federal governments. While the ultimate goal for a recovering addict is sobriety and abstinence, medicines that aid the process such as methadone must also be part of the solution. And while cannabis is a drug with many drawbacks, it is less dangerous than opioids, and “cannabis-friendly” states see fewer problems with opioids.
Those who are currently addicted or who have a loved one who is need to get over any sense of shame they may feel and seek help. Although the road to sobriety ultimately falls upon the addict’s willingness to deal with the problem.
There are five stages which an addict must pass before reaching sobriety:
- Precontemplation: The addict doesn’t see the problem and is not seeking change.
- Contemplation: The addict acknowledges the problem, but doesn’t do anything about it.
- Preparation: The addict makes small changes toward sobriety but doesn’t succeed.
- Action: The addict’s behavior has changed, but the six-month threshold for maintenance of sobriety has yet to be achieved.
- Maintenance: The addict has sustained sobriety for six months and is fully committed to avoiding a relapse.
Other ways of turning things around include avoiding getting addicted in the first place. If an individual sustains an injury, he must recognize that the pain medication he is prescribed is in itself as much a threat as the injury. Medication must be reduced, and ultimately stopped, as the injury heals. Additionally, any unneeded medications should be removed from the home. Employers, for their part, should cultivate a work culture which encourages sobriety and gives employees access to help when needed. The dignity of work goes a long way toward encouraging sobriety. The medical establishment must also seek ways to better manage pain and its associated addiction issues.
The opioid crisis shows no sign of slowing down. The elephant in the room is that the opioid crisis is part of the Great Replacement. Nelson doesn’t mention this, of course, or else his book would never have been published. We must, however.
See also: “Work to be Such a Man,” “Kensington,” & “Opiates for America’s Heartland”
Dealing%20with%20the%20Opioid%20Crisis%20at%20the%20Strategic%20Level
Share
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate at least $10/month or $120/year.
- Donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Everyone else will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days. Naturally, we do not grant permission to other websites to repost paywall content before 30 days have passed.
- Paywall member comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Paywall members have the option of editing their comments.
- Paywall members get an Badge badge on their comments.
- Paywall members can “like” comments.
- Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, please visit our redesigned Paywall page.
Related
-
Is Everyone Really Equal?
-
The Vietnam War’s Insider Threat
-
Death And The Maiden: Martin Amis’ London Fields
-
What Western Schools Can Learn From the World
-
Meet Me Tonight In Atlantic City
-
Interpreting Conspiracies
-
The Presence of the Past: A Brief Tour of Webster’s Weird World
-
Things That Need To Be Said About Communist China
13 comments
Excellent article. My local ice cream shop has Narcan on the counter. I live in one of the areas depicted as being in the ‘Rust Belt’. There are 11 US states where Whites are a minority of the population. There are at least 5 more states where Whites will be a minority by the next census (I live in one of them). Which is why I caution against the use of ‘majority’ or ‘American majority’ in our literature.
Wow, I didn’t know there were that many. I checked the 2020 census to make sure. There were fewer than 11 mostly non-white states, but there were so many on the cusp of becoming majority-minority over the last couple of years that I think your figures are correct.
Either way, this is sobering information.
The source of my information is the White Papers Policy Institute.
https://whitepapersinstitute.substack.com/p/white-retreat-is-not-defeat
Another vital component to getting off opioids is a drug that is a combination of two drugs mentioned by the author: buprenorphine and naloxone. This drug’s trade name is Suboxone and it is also available in generic form. It comes in various strengths and is a small film that is placed under the tongue (sublingual) for extremely fast absorption and to bypass what is called First-pass metabolism.
Of course, none of the following should be considered as medical advice, just an opinion.
Why is Suboxone vital? As the author very well describes, addiction is extremely hard to stop as the high is quite pleasant and helps one deal/ignore the problems of life. Opioids bind/stimulate with certain pain receptors and over time, the body becomes accustomed to the constant stimulation of these opioid receptors. This creates two problems: 1. the body requires increasingly higher amounts of opioids to get the same high. After a while, it becomes next to impossible to get enough. 2. If an addict can’t get the next dose of opioids, the body quite literally “rebels.” Without opioids stimulating these receptors, the body reacts with some nasty withdrawal side effects: trembling, twitching, runny nose and eyes, pain, severe flu-like feelings, and as some say, hell. It really is unpleasant and can take a very long time for the body to overcome this.
This is where Suboxone helps. Since it has the opioid buprenorphine, the body gets those opioid rectors “filled” and thus the horrible withdrawal side effects are eliminated or quite reduced. But buprenorphine is a partial opioid receptor stimulator so there’s no high (or an attenuated high). Buprenorphine can be an analgesic but is nowhere near as strong as opioids such as oxycodone or oxymorphone. The second drug on Suboxone, which is naloxone, is added to make sure that the buprenorphine is not misused. Naloxone taken sublingually basically does nothing, but if the film is snorted or taken in some other illegal fashion, the naloxone will work and could cause a horrible precipitated withdrawal.
Another problem with opioids used to treat pain is that if taken over time, the body reacts by getting worse pain. It sounds counter-intuitive, but it happens and is called opioid-induced hyperalgesia.
There is also data showing that some people’s genetic makeup predisposes them to be opioid hyper-metabolizers. This means a normal dose of opioid might not be enough. People who need a lot more dental sedation than usual might by opioid hyper-metabolizers.
As the author very correctly states, we need to avoid falling into the opioid trap. There is no doubt that opioids have a role to play in pain control. But always, always remember that the high they give can in no way equal the high of a life well lived and a clean conscience. I will add that having a supportive spouse or friend who can monitor you if you need opioids will also help. Watching videos of the drug zombies that live in the Kensington area of Philadelphia can also help avoid the addiction problem entirely.
Excellent comment, thank you
Excellent article, as always from van de Camp. I learned a lot.
That said, I disagree with the central thrust of the book and review: that for whatever reason addicts are “victims” of all of these larger, hostile forces. I still don’t understand this assessment. I unfortunately see all sorts of white druggies where I live, mainly when they steal from my local supermarket and drugstore (I’ve stopped several scumbags, as well as reported a host to security, which did do some good – though many times, the worthless nonwhite security guards did nothing, per corporate orders, they’ve baldly stated, perhaps correctly). These bastards arouse ZERO sympathy from me. They are arrogant, and sometimes (in my presence) violent when confronted by opposition to their thieving (which has come from patrons as much as employees).
My non-expert sense is that most fenty-freaks are not at all pain-med takers who became involuntarily addicted. They are behavioral underclass scum who get into the drug scene voluntarily, and stay in it despite many taxpayer-funded local government programs aimed at fighting addiction, whose offers of treatment they typically reject.
Meanwhile, of course, life gets worse for the many decent people afflicted with chronic pain who greatly benefit from these opioid miracle drugs, and use them responsibly as directed, but who encounter a tightening web of restrictions affecting their access – truly another example of “anarcho-tyranny”.
Nationalists have about a hundred issues of vastly greater importance (the border, Replacement, DEI, cancel culture, black mob violence, Chicom espionage, etc) to analyze, expose, and act on than opioid addiction.
Addiction runs in my family, and I myself have two vices: compulsive exercise and high end wine. I recognize my propensity to addiction and thus structure my life around it with a series of bright line rules that cannot be broken under any circumstances (ie no drinks except Friday and Saturday, no spirits or beer unless I just did an endurance event, no going to bars). I thank God that all opiates are extremely unpleasant for me (and I’ve tried a great deal of them): extreme nausea, auditory hallucinations, erectile dysfunction that lasts for well over a week after the high, constipation to the point of crippling pain. I am grateful not only because these are addictive substances, but because even after you kick it, there is still something off about you for the rest of your life, as if some part of your soul had been removed. I’ve known many recovering heroin addicts that are completely dead behind the eyes, and always half a step slow. It’s frankly tragic. The only other drug that I’ve seen that’s worse long term is ecstasy.
Why do you say ecstasy has worse long-term effects than heroin? And this is based upon what level of use? Genuinely curious.
A side effect of MDMA is that it damages synapses. According to one study (I don’t have the citation, as I read about it a long time ago), this sets in fairly early on. With sufficient abuse, this is noticeable, and users will become mentally slow and have halting speech. Informally it’s called being “e-tarded”.
In most cases people who started using opioids against chronic pain did so because they could not afford to lose their job. They would have gotten better if they could stop going to work for 1-2 years and cure the causes of their pain. Opioids enable such people to work for another 5-15 years before they collapse. Paradoxically the measures against addiction make their situation worse as they cannot get normal prescription for the increased dosis they now need. Note that people with chronic pain cannot just wean themselves off the drug because than they would still have to somehow cope with the pain, now worse (not only with the withdrawal symptoms).
Maybe we can learn from the Asians in this instance. The Viet Cong had a cure for dope addicts. Whenever they caught one of their guys stoned on opium, they’d lock him up for three weeks of cold turkey therapy. That sounds pretty efficient, and Victor Charlie Doper would learn a lesson. As for the ChiComs, they had a harsher method, which was 100% effective – it wouldn’t break my heart to see this befall pushers, from the street exploiters all the way up to corporate types who deliberately poison the public.
I despise drugs/alcohol and users. I never understood and have no sympathy for the idea that some, like prescription users/addicts are better or less pathetic than others. I’ve had many problems in life, yet I’ve never even had marijuana. The problem is weak people and a sick society that encourages and glorifies disgusting things. With that being said, I do wish people struggling with these issues all the best and a sober future, the ones that realize they have an issue that is. The rest, like people who have been to rehab 75 times, I don’t care. At some point one must wash his or her hands clean and walk away.
opioids do have a place in pain management, as a commenter stressed. However, they were dispensed like candy during the early phase of the Opioid Epidemic. I don’t know if Harry Nelson’s book goes into this, but groups that shilled for opioids, as the end-all be all for pain, need to take responsibility as well. Patrick Keefe’s “Empire of Pain” uncovers the groups and names names. Members of the elite had a prominent role in protecting the Opioid Overlords.
With respect to keeping drugs out–perhaps there is something we can learn from Asians: death penalty for traffickers. These Asian countries it should also be noted have control over immigration.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment