The Worst Week Yet: November 27-December 3, 2022
Posted By Jim Goad On In North American New Right | Comments Disabled
[1]2,256 words
Kanye West Suspended From Twitter for Posting Image of Raëlian “Schwartztika” Logo
Sometime in the mid-1990s, while amusing myself by batting around ideas for fake racial-justice charity organizations such as “Negrowth” and “Up With Negroes!”, I conceived of a satirical Nazi-Zionist alliance called “Never Say, ‘Never Again.’”
The org’s basic premise was that Nazis and Jews should stop all their bickering, put aside their differences, and agree to amicably carve up the world among themselves. The organization’s logo would be the Raëlian symbol [2] — a swastika that effortlessly interweaves with a Star of David in a half-assed and comically incompatible gesture of global unity. The symbol is also known as the “Swastika of David,” but my preferred moniker for it is the “Schwartztika.”
Raëlism was founded in 1973 by French racecar driver Claude Vorhilon. He claims that he was visited by extraterrestrials called the Elohim, who are simply advanced intergalactic creatures rather than deities. Rechristening himself as Raël, he says that the Elohim designated him the last of 40 Elohim/human hybrids who were handpicked to spread their message, placing him in the rarefied company of such spiritual luminaries as the Buddha, Jesus, and Muhammad. As someone who’s far more cynically-minded than spiritually inclined, I view Raëlism as one aging racecar driver’s attempt to snag as many hot topless women [3] as he could before his pistons ceased to function.
Last Thursday evening, superstar rapper, sneaker mogul, and aspiring anti-Semite Kanye West was suspended from Twitter for posting an image of the Schwartztika [4] along with the verbiage “YE24 LOVE EVERYONE #LOVESPEECH.”
Despite everything that West had said and done in the previous weeks, posting the Schwartztika was what crossed the line for African-American entrepreneur Elon Musk. “Sorry, but you have gone too far. This is not love,” tweeted Musk at West before permanently yanking West’s account. Musk subsequently tweeted, “I tried my best. Despite that, he violated our rule against incitement to violence. Account will be suspended.”
I’m always fascinated by where people choose to draw the imaginary “line” between what’s acceptable and what isn’t. West’s earlier threat to go “death con 3 [5]” on Jews apparently didn’t qualify as an incitement to violence, yet a symbolic gesture — however clumsy and naïve — urging Jews and Nazis to overlook old grudges and break bread together was enough to prompt Musk to use the heckler’s veto and ban West merely on the idea that someone would become mesmerized upon viewing a Schwartztika and suddenly go on a Jew-stabbing rampage.
Miraculously, no one seemed to worry about whether the image would incite violence against Nazis, and I propose that it’s this callous and uncaring attitude toward the safety and well-being of Nazis that has landed us squarely in the pickle that we currently find ourselves as a so-called “society.”
Although Musk had sold himself as a free-speech absolutist during his takeover of Twitter, he recently vowed not to let Alex Jones — who has a disquieting tendency to raise legitimate questions about the global power structure only moments before taking off his shirt and screaming to high heaven as his floppy man-boobs flail about in the Texas heat — back onto the site. “I have no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children for gain, politics or fame,” Musk said in attempting to justify Twitter’s perma-ban on Jones.
Earlier on Thursday before Kanye West was likewise banned from Twitter, the dark-skinned idol of wigger nationalists worldwide appeared on Infowars with a black mask covering his black face to deliver a blitzkrieg’s worth of pro-Hitler and anti-Anti-Defamation League (ADL) comments that had Jones laughing uncomfortably and attempting to squirm out of his beet-red skin:
I see good things about Hitler. . . . I’m done with the classification, every human being has something of value that they brought to the table, especially Hitler. I like Hitler. . . . He didn’t kill six million Jews. That’s just factually incorrect. . . . I’m not trying to be shocking. I like Hitler. The Holocaust is not what happened. . . . Hitler has a lot of redeeming qualities. . . . We gotta stop dissing the Nazis all the time . . . I love Nazis. . . . I do love Hitler, I do love the Zionists, I love everyone. . . . I love Jewish people, I love supermodels. . . . Nobody cares about the ADL. They’re played out. . . . We don’t care anymore, ADL, obviously. No one cares. . . . I love everyone. This is love speech.
Jews, Hitler, supermodels — Kanye loves ’em all! What’s to hate?
West also credited Hitler with inventing highways and the microphone. He said that his mother — meaning West’s mother, not Hitler’s, sorry for not clarifying — died as a “Zionist sacrifice” in 2007 when she perished from plastic surgery-related complications.
In other words, it was probably the most entertaining interview any black American celebrity had given since the days when Muhammad Ali flustered well-meaning Caucasian interviewers by adamantly opposing miscegenation [6].
Some suspect that it was West’s pro-Hitler comments from earlier in the day, not his suggestion that both Nazis and Jews are human beings who should be accorded equal amounts of love and respect, that actually led to his ban.
People, what kind of sick and depraved world do we live in when an emphatically unambiguous message of “love everyone” is twisted and mangled and distorted into an “incitement to violence”?
Nazis get defamed right and left, up and down, all the livelong day and hardly make a peep about it. I suggest that Jews would do well to emulate Nazis in this regard. Jews have abused the heckler’s veto long enough in their neurotic quest to stamp out all possible criticism. For all the blather about “white privilege,” there is no higher privilege than immunity from criticism. Beyond that, it’s a scientific fact that nobody likes a crybaby.
Janet Yellen Says Inflation Is Caused by American Peasants Recklessly “Splurging” on Luxury Items
Sometimes people who’ve been sheltered by wealth their entire lives will say something so tauntingly callous that one is tempted to think that they want you to hate them. When you realize this, you attempt to withhold your hatred of them just for spite, but they’re so despicable that you wind up hating them anyway in spite of yourself.
Such is the case with the beastly, birdlike former Federal Reserve Chair and current Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen [7], who recently received a fawning interview by late-night CIA mind-control slave Stephen Colbert. When he asked Yellen how “inflation got so high” after “everything seemed fine” only two years ago, and how even the Biden Administration downplayed the possibility of inflation as recently as last year, this is how the Wicked Witch of Fiat Currency responded:
So we had a rapid recovery from the pandemic, when President Biden was elected, unemployment was quite high, it was close to 7%, and we put policies in place that generated a very rapid recovery. Unemployment quickly fell back into the threes. . . . So, normally you wouldn’t expect, because we had such a rapid recovery, for inflation to rise very much, if at all. But it turned out the pandemic had very special impacts on the economy. Remember, everybody stopped spending on services. They were in their homes for a year or more, um, they wanted to buy grills and office furniture, they were working from home, they suddenly started splurging on goods, buying technology, you know, suddenly working through technology, and bottlenecks started developing where supply, in particular important sectors of the economy, just couldn’t keep up with demand.
Yellen would go on to blame Russia for inflated food and gas prices.
[8]You can buy Jim Goad’s The Redneck Manifesto here. [9]
She made not a peep about the fact that the government purposely shut down the US economy over the false-flag “pandemic.”
She didn’t say a word about the three COVID checks that the government sent out to people or the incentives they gave people not to pay rent or honor mortgage payments and student loan payments.
She kept her thin lips firmly shut about the fact that the Federal Reserve inflated the money supply by printing $13 trillion in essentially worthless paper dollars in the year 2021 alone.
She steadfastly avoided any mention of the fact that Biden’s war on fossil fuels [10] may in some way be related to higher gas prices.
Or the fact that the government has been “splurging” to the point where the official national debt is $31 trillion [11] and rising. Or that when one counts unfunded liabilities and other broken government promises, the actual debt is somewhere around $250 trillion [12].
No. It’s all because the peasants, whom you forced to work from home, were “splurging” on grills and office furniture.
The arrogant, dried-up crow might as well have said, “Let them eat debt.”
Canadian Judge Cites the “History of Colonialism” in Decision to Let Throat-Slitting Injun Avoid Prison
Canada exists in a perpetual state of seething resentment against the United States because whereas the US dominates global discourse, people need to be constantly reminded that Canada exists.
Whatever is wrong with the United States — and it’s a lot — at least our Criminal [13] Code [13] isn’t so poisoned by progressive ideology that it counsels judges to impose lesser sentences on “Aboriginal offenders” than ordinary citizens like Canada’s does:
. . . all available sanctions, other than imprisonment, that are reasonable in the circumstances and consistent with the harm done to victims or to the community should be considered for all offenders, with particular attention to the circumstances of Aboriginal offenders.
Albertan provincial court Judge Harry Van Harten is a white man who very clearly would rather be anything besides a white man. In an infamous 2016 ruling [14] regarding a 2015 case wherein an “Aboriginal offender” named Tamara Crowchief yelled “I hate white people!” as she knocked out a white woman’s tooth, Van Harten acknowledged what Crowchief said but denied that it was motivated by “racial bias”:
The offender said “I hate white people” and threw a punch. Her counsel argued that the offender was complaining about her socio-economic situation. Crown counsel called that “mere speculation.” I agree. But there is no evidence either way about what the offender meant or whether (as in the cited cases) she holds or promotes an ideology which would explain why this assault was aimed at this victim. . . . I am not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that this offence was, even in part, motivated by racial bias.
Similarly, in a 2019 ruling [15] about a case where an “Aboriginal offender” shoved an elderly white woman off a train platform and permanently paralyzed her, Van Harten gave the perp “six months credit due to her troubled upbringing as an Indigenous [sic] youth.”
During the early-morning rush hour in Calgary on May 8 of this year, a 25-year-old “Aboriginal offender” named Bobby Crane used a utility knife to leave a nine-inch gash across the throat of a 65-year-old visually impaired white man named Leonard Smith. Before randomly attacking Smith, Crane had told a friend that he wanted to “get” someone with his knife. So the attack was premeditated and unprovoked.
Crane’s defense lawyer argued that her client was a lifelong sufferer of “Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder,” which is a nice way of saying that his mom was a typical First Nations sloppy-drunk squaw. She also said that sending him to prison would make society less safe upon his release.
Judge Van Harten agreed with the defense that sending Crane to federal prison would be counterproductive, adding that the generational trauma of having to live around technologically advanced white people was a contributing factor to Crane’s attack on an elderly man with failing sight. “The history of colonialism has to be taken into account,” Van Harten said.
Canada, I have had it with you.
Queering the National Hockey League
In a further groin kick to Canadian masculinity, the National Hockey League (NHL) — whose rosters are still about 97% white [16] and nearly half-Canadian — recently announced their support to the Gender Delusion that has gaslit most of the civilized world into submission over the past decade.
On November 22, the NHL tweeted [17]:
The NHL is proud to support this past weekend’s Team Trans Draft Tournament in Middleton, Wisconsin. This was the first tournament comprised entirely of transgender and nonbinary players, with around 80 folks participating! #HockeyIsForEveryone [18] #NHLPride [19]
When a user replied, “So, men playing on womans [sic] team?,” the NHL doubled down on the gender psychosis:
Trans women are women. Trans men are men. Nonbinary identity is real.
Okay, I’ll bite. If they’re really men, how can you tell they’re “trans”? You should just see them as men in that case, and your self-segregating “Team Trans Draft Tournament” constitutes an act of viciously hypocritical and innately dangerous transphobia.
Digging themselves a deeper ice hole in the middle of a frozen lake, the NHL cited their “Hockey is for Everyone [20]” program, which states:
We support any teammate, coach or fan who brings heart, energy and passion to the rink. We believe all hockey programs — from professionals to youth organizations — should provide a safe, positive and inclusive environment for players and families regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, gender identity or expression, disability, sexual orientation and socio-economic status.
Regardless of disability?!? Okay, I’m calling your bluff, NHL. I fondly remember the days of the viciously scrappy “Broad Street Bullies,” AKA the Philadelphia Flyers, of the mid-1970s, who basically punched their way to two Stanley Cups and won the adoration of a town that has been losing clout ever since 1776. If you don’t hire a quadriplegic goalie for the Flyers by the end of this fiscal year, I will sue you into oblivion. We need to stop enabling ableism.
Let the sissies have their arts and crafts. But leave hockey to real men.
[21]
* * *
Like all journals of dissident ideas, Counter-Currents depends on the support of readers like you. Help us compete with the censors of the Left and the violent accelerationists of the Right with a donation today. (The easiest way to help is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.)
For other ways to donate, click here [22].