The Worst Week Yet: November 6-12, 2022
Posted By Jim Goad On In North American New Right | Comments Disabled
[1]Hawaiians shown from before their beautiful civilization was destroyed by the white man.
2,710 words
Sudden and Shocking Discovery of Hateful “Noose” Halts Construction of Shiny New Billion-Dollar Obama Presidential Center
Whether it’s Jussie Smollett, Bubba Wallace, or a rancid cornucopia of other “fake noose [2]” stories the media hypes but that wind up being complete hoaxes, the usual suspects jump right on the next one and start humping it like nothing had ever happened.
The latest alleged incident [3] involves The First And Hopefully Last Black President America Has Ever Had: “A disturbing discovery at the site of the Obama Presidential Center in Chicago has put construction on pause . . . because someone left a noose in the area.”
In the interest of full disclosure, I must confess that I used a bit of artistic license in describing the $830-million project as costing a billion dollars in the subhead up there. Sure, $830 million isn’t a billion, but it’s nearly a billion, and it’s exactly $830 million more than we need to spend. No one in world history has had his ass kissed more feverishly than Barack Obama has, and if the powers-that-be actually cared about black lives as much as they say they do, they’d use that $830 million to buy bulletproof vests for every black child on Chicago’s South Side.
The governor of Illinois, the black-owned construction group overseeing the project, and the almighty Obama Foundation itself all jumped on the word “hate” and assumed that it was the only possible motivation. They didn’t say anything about waiting until the facts come in before rushing to judgment. Simultaneously on cue, as if they were all controlled by the same remote-control device, they all belched out the word “hate.”
The Obama Foundation called the incident “shameless” and an “act of cowardice and hate . . . designed to get attention and divide us.”
Lakeside Alliance [4], the black-owned construction conglomerate building the shrine to our big-eared mulatto former chief executive, issued a statement:
We reported the incident to the police and will provide any assistance required to identify those responsible. We have zero tolerance for any form of bias or hate on our worksite. Anti-bias training is included in our onboarding process and reiterated during sitewide meetings. We are suspending all operations on-site in order to provide another series of these trainings and conversations for all staff and workers.
Illinois Governor J. B. Pritzker tweeted [5]:
Hate has no place in Illinois. The noose is more than a symbol of racism, it is a heart-stopping reminder of the violence and terror inflicted on Black [sic] Americans for centuries.
Construction worker Rico Pineda says that he and his crew have been placed on indefinite leave:
The first thing I thought was man, that’s messed up. There’s still racism going around, even with a union job. This job is guaranteed to the workers inside until 2025. Why risk that? They don’t want the locals who they’ve hired to work to fear their life is in danger. They said everything is shut down until they actually find out what happened. It could take a week, a month, however long it takes to make people feel safe.
The idea that construction workers on a billion-dollar project on Chicago’s South Side are endangered by a random piece of rope more than they would be if they merely walked one block in any direction from the construction project is bitterly hilarious.
If this proves to be a hoax — and I expect it will, since the site was said to have security cameras installed along its perimeter—they should forever cease construction and put the $830 million into a nationwide education program about hate-crime hoaxes.
Let’s Drag More AIDS Patients into the Armed Forces!
There is a litany of medical conditions [6] that can disqualify someone from enlisting in the US armed forces. Among them are inflammatory bowel disease, hemorrhoids, hernia, gout, ingrown toenails, arthritis, prostatitis, and being over 6’8”.
Despite this, no one has ever accused the US military of being “hemorrhoidophobic.”
Even though AIDS is not a gay disease, you are automatically homophobic if you do not wish to spend time in the military trenches alongside someone who is all HIVved up. With the bulldozing forward march of progress, enlightened souls realize that having a completely AIDS-free armed forces is, like, so yesterday.
Although you may have felt that the US military should be waging war against illegal immigrants, Islamic terrorists, or good old-fashioned white-supremacist terrorists, the sad truth of the matter is that “The Military Is Waging War on HIV-Positive Soldiers [7].” But now a series of lawsuits [8] filed by HIV+ would-be American gladiators arguing that anti-retroviral drugs lower one’s viral load to where it is “virtually undetectable” may finally break the “ass ceiling” and allow sodomites and IV drug abusers into our military ranks.
If a soldier or an aspiring soldier acquired HIV through receptive anal sex, I suppose it’s not too insensitive to claim he received a “dishonorable discharge” into his rectum. And if the same soldier were to clumsily splash another soldier with his infected blood, that, too, would be a “dishonorable discharge.”
“Hate-Preacher” Says Gay Sex Makes Men’s Intestines Fall Out
As the Reverend Fred Phelps demonstrated for all the world to see, there is no more entertaining breed of Christian preacher than one who can’t stop railing about faggots.
In mid-October, Christian “hate-preacher” — I have no idea why it’s hyphenated, but that appears to be the preferred form — Steven Anderson [9] was filmed telling his flock that “I would rather eat my own vomit out of a bowl with a spoon every day for the rest of my life until I’m 100 years old than to engage in what [gays] do one single time.” It’s a remarkable statement, not only because I’m reasonably certain no one ever demanded or even suggested that he eats his own vomit, I’m also pretty sure no one ever asked him to do anything gay.
About a week later, another “hate-preacher” named Jonathan Shelley of the Stedfast [sic] Baptist Church recorded a sermon called “Why is someone a homosexual? [10]” in which he echoed Steven Anderson’s unsolicited offer to eat his own vomit rather than have gay sex. Offering up a strange hypothetical, he said:
Pastor Shelley, you’re gonna have to eat Indian food and ranch dressing every day of your life, or do that one time?
It’s like, bring on the Indian food.
What if you, Pastor Shelley, what if you had to eat Indian food and ranch and then vomit it up and then eat it again, or do that one time? It’s like, bring on the vomit.
Shelley explained that homosexuality is wrong because men hurt both themselves and others by defiling their bodies: “Their intestines will sometimes just fall out because of the actions that they do.”
As absurdly demented as that sounds, it’s sort of half-true. A gay-friendly medical website [11] explains that while anal sex will not cause your intestines to “just fall out,” rectal prolapse is common:
Rectal prolapse is when your rectum — the last section of your large intestine — drops and pushes through your anus. In the anal sex community, especially those who identify as gay, this is commonly referred to as a “rosebud,” and the act of pushing it out is known as “blooming.” . . . When people engage in excessive anal play, especially with large toys and fisting, and over-douching, they run the risk of losing muscle tone, which can lead to rectal prolapse. Another culprit is blooming, which is quite popular within certain communities. People love to bloom and/or are asked to bloom by their partners, which can have long-term effects. We support all the ways in which people engage; however, we want people to understand over time, the bloom won’t resemble the beautiful flower it once did.
Okay, gonna have to side with the hate-preachers on this one. As delusional as they can be, they’ve never mistaken a rectal prolapse for a “beautiful flower.”
Two Indigenous Hawaiians on Trial for “Hate Crime” Against White Immigrant
If you’re white and have ever traveled out of Hawaii’s tourist zones into some of the less-developed rural towns, you can probably attest that the fat, indigenous pineapple-heads who populate such areas are still furious that their ancestors were too dumb and technologically backward to repel white colonists.
Their anti-white pejorative of choice is haole (pronounced “HOW-lee”), whose etymology is disputed. One explanation says that it means “no breath,” because palefaced invaders weren’t aware that when native Hawaiians greeted each other, they’d each inhale a lungful of the other’s breath, which is one of the most primitive and disgusting things I’ve ever heard. The “no breath” conceit extends in some quarters to the implication that non-Hawaiians also have no soul. Another explanation says that haole is simply a catch-all phrase meaning “foreigner.”
Anti-white animus is so intense in large swaths of rural Hawaii that it gave rise to the legend of “Kill Haole Day [12],” in which resentful and adipose poi-gobblers would randomly choose a day in which to bully and abuse white students. A 2008 Department of Education report concluded that there was “substantial evidence that students experienced racially and sexually derogatory violence and name-calling on nearly a daily basis on school buses, at school bus stops, in school hallways and other areas of the school.” It also stated that teachers rarely responded to white students’ complaints of abuse.
In 2014, a white man from the American mainland named Christopher Kunzelman [13] purchased a house in Kahakulua Village on Maui. Reports vary on what ignited the confrontation, but his surveillance cameras [14] captured two indigenous Hawaiians, as fat and dumb-looking as you might imagine, verbally harassing him and repeatedly beating him with a shovel. Although Kunzelman was as submissive and meek as most white people in such situations are these days, his antagonists were relentless in their aggression, repeatedly calling him a haole and saying things such as, “You don’t belong here. . . . It’s nothing personal, you just have the wrong fucking color skin.” (Although the linked version of the video is less than five minutes, the complete version clocks in at around 23 minutes.)
The attack left Kunzelman with a concussion, two broken ribs, and abdominal trauma. In 2019, five years after the assault, the criminal-justice system handed assailants Kaulana Alo-Kaonohi [15] and Levi Aki Jr. [16] a draconian sentence of, um, probation.
Last week, eight years after the attack, the two brown lumps of suet were each charged [17] with a federal hate crime. Defense lawyers argue that even though they called Kunzelman a haole, there is no proof they meant anything racial by it, despite their inconvenient use of phrases such as “wrong fucking color skin” and “you don’t belong here.”
Is it possible that one day, indigenous Hawaiians will overplay their hand to the point where they have to face the Wrath of the Awakened Haole?
Poll: 1 in 6 Hiring Managers Say They’ve Been Told to Stop Hiring White Men
A recent poll of “1,000 hiring managers across the U.S.” conducted by ResumeBuilder.com [18] arrived at the following discomfiting conclusions:
- One in six (16%) say they’ve been asked to “deprioritize” the hiring of white men. 14% say they’ve been asked to do the same thing regarding white women.
- 52% say their company engages in “reverse discrimination” against white recruits.
- 48% say they’ve been instructed to value “diversity” over “qualifications.”
- 53% say they fear they’d be fired if they don’t make enough “diverse” hires to please their masters.
If white Americans don’t get their shit together and form some hybrid version of the NAACP and ADL for whites pronto, they will become despised paupers in the land their ancestors tamed.
New Stats on Race and Violent Crime — According to the Victims
[19]You can buy Jim Goad’s Whiteness: The Original Sin here [20].
The annual FBI Uniform Crime Reports are one of the most valuable tools for assessing racial disparities in crime, but they are flawed because they only reflect reports from about 60% [21] of all of the nation’s law-enforcement agencies and are based strictly on police reports. So not only is the data incomplete, it opens a loophole for those who’d like to argue, without any evidence, that the country’s legal system is biased against non-whites due to racist policing policies.
As the inestimable Jared Taylor has pointed out for years, the National Crime Victimization Survey [22] (NCVS) is based not on arrests, but on descriptions by crime victims of their assailants. According to Taylor:
Other reports may tell you how many blacks or whites were arrested for violence, but it’s almost impossible to find out the races of their victims. . . . The NCVS tells you. It’s an annual survey of American crime victims who describe every attack they suffered during the survey period, including crimes they didn’t report to the police. This means the results are a very accurate picture of what actually happened, not just crimes the police heard about.
The only category in which the NCVS is of no use is homicide, since dead men tell no tales.
Taylor analyzed the numbers from the 2021 NCVS and reached the following mathematical conclusions:
- 2,641,720 cases involved whites being victimized by violence. 56.6% of the perpetrators were white, 18.1% were black, and 10.9% were Hispanic or “other.”
- 608,000 cases involved black victims of violence. A mere 11.4% of the perpetrators were white, 59% were black, and the rest were Hispanic or “other.”
- Discounting murder, where blacks outperform their quotient of the population by a very vibrant and robust 400%, blacks commit violent crimes at a clip 241% larger than their share of the population.
- When committing violence, whites choose other whites as their victims 84.5% of the time. Blacks and Hispanics choose to attack whites the most, followed by their own race.
- A black person is 35 times more likely to violently attack a white than the inverse.
- Blacks are 1.8 times more likely to commit violence than to be victimized by it, whereas whites are 1.4 times more likely to be victimized.
- Blacks, whites, and Hispanics are about equally as likely to call police. Interestingly, despite the ghetto creed of “snitches get stitches,” blacks are slightly more likely than other races to call the police when they are victimized by violent crime.
And yet our cultural overlords employ professional syndicated black whiny-babies such as Leonard Pitts, Jr. [23], who recently pecked out a column about how he finds it “infuriating” that people allege “racism against white people” exists:
Six years after [a white cop “body-slammed” a black woman in Texas but didn’t kill her], five years after Charlottesville [where not one black died], four years after a court awarded 4 cents to the family of a Black [sic] man in Florida executed by police, three years after a white man threatened a Black [sic] one with a knife for walking in a “white town” in Kansas, two years after Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor and George Floyd, it is difficult to overstate the brazenness of the white right asking us to fret over “racism against white people.”
Let’s unpack what Sambo is saying here, shall we? The “4 cents [24]” was actually $4 (hello, fact-checkers?), and it involved a man who was pointing a gun at police when they wound up shooting him, which doesn’t technically qualify as an execution, but facts have never gotten in the way of blacks’ incurable need to feel victimized. The other three deaths he mentions all involve blacks who either shot at police, wrestled with whites over a shotgun, or wrestled with police while high on fentanyl. So that’s four deaths, each one of them with severe mitigating circumstances, and he wants us to shut up about anti-white racism from here to eternity. And those are the only “racist” murders of blacks he lists over a six-year span.
Meanwhile, if you average the black-on-white murders over the same six-year span according to the Expanded Homicide Data Table 6 [25] of the FBI Uniform Crime Reports, blacks killed around 3,300 whites. Whites killed around 1,500 blacks over the same time span, but then again, whites outnumber blacks 5 to 1 in America, so whites are sorely underperforming when it comes to interracial murder.
Black America, you need a more competent advocate than Leonard Pitts, Jr. And Leonard Pitts, you need to shut up about black victimization, or at least come up with some compelling facts. Your peeps have never had it so good anywhere else on the planet than they do in the United States right now. You have no idea how tired we are of your nonsense.
[26]
* * *
Like all journals of dissident ideas, Counter-Currents depends on the support of readers like you. Help us compete with the censors of the Left and the violent accelerationists of the Right with a donation today. (The easiest way to help is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.)
For other ways to donate, click here [27].