Counter-Currents
  • Private Events
  • T&C
  • Contact
  • Webzine
  • About
  • Books
  • Podcasts
  • Donate
  • Paywall
  • Crypto
  • Mailing List
  • RSS
    • Main feed
    • Podcast feed
    • Videos feed
    • Comments feed
  • Advertise

LEVEL2

  • Webzine
  • About
  • Books
  • Podcasts
  • Donate
  • Paywall
  • Crypto
  • Mailing List
  • RSS
    • Main feed
    • Podcast feed
    • Videos feed
    • Comments feed
  • Advertise
  • Recent posts

    • Limited Edition Clearance Sale

      Greg Johnson

    • Remembering Charles Lindbergh

      Anthony Bavaria

    • Spencer J. Quinn Interviewed About The No College Club

      Spencer J. Quinn

    • Black Invention Myths

      Black Invention Myths

      2

    • Race War in the Outback

      Jim Goad

      27

    • A Woman’s Guide to Identifying Psychopaths, Part 7 More of the Most Common Jobs for Psychopaths

      James Dunphy

    • Black History Month Resources

      Greg Johnson

      6

    • 40% Off Selected Titles

      Cyan Quinn

      5

    • The Union Jackal, January 2023

      Mark Gullick

      3

    • Spencer J. Quinn’s The No College Club: A Review

      Anthony Bavaria

      7

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 521 Daily Zoomer & Spencer J. Quinn Discuss The No College Club

      Counter-Currents Radio

      1

    • Everything Whites Do Is Bad . . . According to the Mainstream Media

      Beau Albrecht

      13

    • Guillermo del Toro’s Pinocchio

      Margot Metroland

      7

    • American Krogan on Louis C. K. Advocating for Open Borders

      American Krogan

      11

    • Traditional French Songs from Le Poème Harmonique

      Alex Graham

      1

    • The Worst Week Yet: January 22-28, 2023

      Jim Goad

      25

    • Sports Cars & Small Penises

      Richard Houck

      29

    • Opiates for America’s Heartland

      Morris van de Camp

      12

    • The Whale

      Steven Clark

      3

    • Are Qur’an-Burnings Helpful?

      Nicholas R. Jeelvy

      15

    • Bullet Train to Babylon

      Trevor Lynch

      7

    • The Wave: Fascism Reenacted in a High School

      Beau Albrecht

      6

    • Edred Thorsson a jeho kniha Historie Runové gildy

      Collin Cleary

    • Silicon Valley’s Anti-White Racial Dysgenics Program

      Jason Kessler

      32

    • The Silent Plague of Elderly Asian Mass Shooters in California

      Jim Goad

      36

    • What Went Wrong with America’s Universities?

      Stephen Paul Foster

      3

    • Greg Johnson Speaks to Horus the Avenger About Charles Krafft

      Greg Johnson

      5

    • A Woman’s Guide to Identifying Psychopaths, Part 6 The Most Common Jobs for Psychopaths

      James Dunphy

      13

    • Davos, or the Technocrats’ Ball

      Mark Gullick

      5

    • A Political Prisoner on the Meaning of January 6

      Morris van de Camp

      3

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 520 Inside Serbia with Marko of Zentropa

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • The $50 Million Conservative Inc. Internet Spat

      Spencer J. Quinn

      15

    • Yet Another Woke Remake of a Classic

      Beau Albrecht

      25

    • Spencer J. Quinn & Pox Populi Discuss The No College Club

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 4: “Multitudes” Against the People

      Alain de Benoist

    • The Worst Week Yet: January 15-21, 2023

      Jim Goad

      35

    • Q&A with Jim Goad on The Redneck Manifesto

      Jason Kessler

      3

    • Against Political Hipsterism

      Nicholas R. Jeelvy

      6

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 3: “Multitudes” Against the People

      Alain de Benoist

    • Against White Unionism

      Greg Johnson

      7

    • Hitchcock vs. Visconti

      Derek Hawthorne

      9

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 2: “Multitudes” Against the People

      Alain de Benoist

    • Public Transit in Multicultural Hell

      Gunnar Alfredsson

      12

    • No, You Wasn’t Kings

      Jim Goad

      36

    • The 2022 Counter-Currents Fall Retreat James Edwards & Sam Dickson on White Nationalism in Electoral Politics

      James Edwards & Sam Dickson

      1

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 1: “Multitudes” Against the People

      Alain de Benoist

      1

    • On the Christian Question

      David Lewis

      78

    • Physician, Heal Thyself: The Persecution of Jordan Peterson

      Mark Gullick

      22

    • A Woman’s Guide to Identifying Psychopaths, Part 5 The Workplace

      James Dunphy

      1

    • The Secret of My Success

      Steven Clark

      2

  • Classics Corner

    • Remembering A. R. D. “Rex” Fairburn (February 2, 1904–March 25, 1957)

      Greg Johnson

      1

    • Denis Kearney & the Struggle for a White America

      Theodore J. O'Keefe

      1

    • Posthuman Prospects:
      Artificial Intelligence, Fifth Generation Warfare, & Archeofuturism

      Christopher Pankhurst

      5

    • Earnest Sevier Cox:
      Advocate for the White Ethnostate

      Morris van de Camp

      15

    • Remembering Jack London
      (January 12, 1876–November 22, 1916)

      Greg Johnson

      2

    • Remembering Robinson Jeffers:
      January 10, 1887–January 20, 1962

      John Morgan

      3

    • Remembering Pierre Drieu La Rochelle:
      January 3, 1893–March 15, 1945

      Greg Johnson

    • Remembering Rudyard Kipling (December 30, 1865-January 18, 1936)

      Greg Johnson

      10

    • Restoring White Homelands

      Greg Johnson

      34

    • Remembering Hinton Rowan Helper

      Spencer J. Quinn

      11

    • What’s Wrong with Diversity?

      Greg Johnson

      10

    • Redefining the Mainstream

      Greg Johnson

      3

    • Edward Alsworth Ross:
      American Metapolitical Hero

      Morris van de Camp

      8

    • The Talented Mr. Ripley & Purple Noon

      Trevor Lynch

      19

    • Christmas & the Yuletide:
      Light in the Darkness

      William de Vere

      3

    • Thanksgiving Special 
      White Men Meet Indians:
      Jamestown & the Clash of Civilizations

      Thomas Jackson

    • Colin Wilson’s The Outsider

      Sir Oswald Mosley

      4

    • Dostoyevsky on the Jews

      William Pierce

      4

    • Jefferson &/or Mussolini, Part 1

      Ezra Pound

      5

    • I Listened to Chapo Trap House So You Don’t Have To

      Doug Huntington

      98

    • The Homeric Gods

      Mark Dyal

      13

    • Toward a Baltic-Black Sea Union:
      “Intermarium” as a Viable Model for White Revival

      Émile Durand

      55

    • The Politics of Nuclear War, Part 3

      John Morgan

      30

    • The Politics of Nuclear War, Part 2

      John Morgan

      6

    • Columbus Day Special
      The Autochthony Argument

      Greg Johnson

      9

    • The Politics of Nuclear War, Part 1

      John Morgan

      8

    • The Jewish Question for Normies

      Alan Smithee

      13

    • Human Biodiversity for Normies

      Alan Smithee

      10

    • Bring Back Prohibition!

      Alan Smithee

      65

    • Ethnonationalism for Normies
      (Or, “On the Sense of Coming Home”)

      Alan Smithee

      8

  • Paroled from the Paywall

    • The French Emperor, the German Nutcracker, & the Russian Ballet Part 2

      Kathryn S.

      4

    • The French Emperor, the German Nutcracker, & the Russian Ballet Part 1

      Kathryn S.

    • Death on the Nile (1978 & 2022)

      Trevor Lynch

      13

    • Error & Pride

      Nicholas R. Jeelvy

      12

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 515 The Christmas Special

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 514 The Ghosts of Christmas Past, Present, & Yet to Come on The Writers’ Bloc

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Race & the Bible

      Morris van de Camp

      2

    • PK van der Byl, African Statesman

      Margot Metroland

      3

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 513 The Writers’ Bloc with Horus on the Implicit Whiteness of Liberalism

      Counter-Currents Radio

      4

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 512 Jim Goad on Answer Me!

      Counter-Currents Radio

      3

    • Cleese on Creativity

      Greg Johnson

      6

    • A Woman’s Guide to Identifying Psychopaths, Part 1 Diagnostic Criteria, Associated Personality Disorders, & Brain Attributes

      James Dunphy

      6

    • Death of a Gadfly:
      Plato’s Apology

      Mark Gullick

      1

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 8:
      Ernesto Laclau & Left-Wing Populism

      Alain de Benoist

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 511
      Christmas Lore with Hwitgeard on The Writers’ Bloc

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Bringing Guns to an Idea Fight:
      The Career of Robert DePugh

      Morris van de Camp

      4

    • War Is Our Father

      Gunnar Alfredsson

    • The Foremost Threat to Life on Earth

      James Dunphy

      2

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 510
      The Writers’ Bloc with Jason Kessler on the Kanye Question

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 509
      New Ask Me Anything with Greg Johnson

      Counter-Currents Radio

      6

    • The Problem of Gentile Zionism

      Nicholas R. Jeelvy

      1

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 7:
      Money & the Right

      Alain de Benoist

      2

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 6:
      Liberalism & Morality

      Alain de Benoist

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 507
      The Best Month Ever on The Writers’ Bloc with Anthony Bavaria

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Who Is Not Going to Save the Nation?

      Beau Albrecht

      4

    • J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Fall of Númenor

      Alex Graham

      3

    • The Most Overlooked Christmas Carols

      Buck Hunter

      4

    • Mirko Savage, Mother Europe’s Son

      Ondrej Mann

      3

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 506
      The Writers’ Bloc with Jim Goad on J. D. Vance’s Hillbilly Elegy

      Counter-Currents Radio

      2

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 505
      Mark Weber on the Perils of Empire

      Counter-Currents Radio

      3

  • Recent comments

    • Jim Goad

      Race War in the Outback

      Ahem. "Yours," not "Your's."

    • Liam Kernaghan

      Race War in the Outback

      Jim, Fantastic as always! You can tell me to "Foxtrot Oscar" for being so pedantic if you like...

    • ArminiusMaximus

      Black Invention Myths

      Thank you for putting this together. It was fun to read these very brief synopsis of the history of...

    • Sherman McCoy

      Race War in the Outback

      All signs point to 'no'.

    • Lord Shang

      Race War in the Outback

      "among the best didgeridoo playing you'll ever hear" - I don't think I've ever laughed so hard at a...

    • Lord Shang

      Opiates for America’s Heartland

      Thank you for that excellent link. I'm not someone who believes in pure libertarian drug...

    • Chad

      Black Invention Myths

      I hate it when I get called a racist for busting these myths. I'm not a racist. Racism should be a...

    • Bigfoot

      Silicon Valley’s Anti-White Racial Dysgenics Program

      Academia had gotten in on this propaganda. Some sociologists refer to white people preferring to...

    • European Renaissance

      Black History Month Resources

      Black history month - it's an excellent idea! Excellent because if there is black history month -...

    • Josephus Cato

      Race War in the Outback

      The anal warts and vaginal sores thing was rather disturbing.  I'm guessing an aborigine minstrel...

    • S. Clark

      Guillermo del Toro’s Pinocchio

      Interestingly, in St. Louis Mo., where I live, they made "City Gardens" a kind of beautification...

    • Anthony Bavaria

      Spencer J. Quinn’s The No College Club: A Review

      Agreed. I'll go one step further to suggest that political discourse/metapolitical stuff and the...

    • Dick Squarejaw

      Race War in the Outback

      I read halfway through this article before I thought “this sounds like Jim Goad”. Loved it as usual...

    • Ewigkeit

      Everything Whites Do Is Bad . . . According to the Mainstream Media

      The R-word and its attendant sanctimony will never work for us and it is futile to try to subvert it...

    • Antipodean

      Race War in the Outback

      Very droll.In fairness to my country-men though, many of the hybrid folk are quite charming, even to...

    • Vehmgericht

      Race War in the Outback

      I have a hunch that the cradle of modern Homo sapiens is not East Africa, as we are so frantically...

    • Greg Johnson

      40% Off Selected Titles

      If you have a question, write to [email protected]

    • Fred C. Dobbs

      Race War in the Outback

      We can’t expect Hollywood to portray them in a negative light. You’re correct. The few people I’ve...

    • J Webb

      Race War in the Outback

      Very worthwhile topic. We will see how cleverly Australia will handle this. Will they give in to...

    • Don

      Spencer J. Quinn’s The No College Club: A Review

      A  great step in the right direction. Good, idea driven  pro-White fiction, especially for young...

  • Book Authors

    • Alain de Benoist
    • Anthony M. Ludovici
    • Beau Albrecht
    • Buttercup Dew
    • Charles Krafft
    • Christopher Pankhurst
    • Collin Cleary
    • F. Roger Devlin
    • Fenek Solère
    • Francis Parker Yockey
    • Greg Johnson
    • Gregory Hood
    • H. L. Mencken
    • Irmin Vinson
    • J. A. Nicholl
    • James J. O’Meara
    • Jef Costello
    • Jim Goad
    • Jonathan Bowden
    • Juleigh Howard-Hobson
    • Julius Evola
    • Kerry Bolton
    • Leo Yankevich
    • Michael Polignano
    • Multiple authors
    • Savitri Devi
    • Spencer J. Quinn
    • Tito Perdue
    • Trevor Lynch
  • Webzine Authors

    Contemporary authors

    • Howe Abbott-Hiss
    • Beau Albrecht
    • Aquilonius
    • Anthony Bavaria
    • Michael Bell
    • Alain de Benoist
    • Kerry Bolton
    • Jonathan Bowden
    • Buttercup Dew
    • Collin Cleary
    • Giles Corey
    • Jef Costello
    • Morris V. de Camp
    • F. Roger Devlin
    • Bain Dewitt
    • Jack Donovan
    • Ricardo Duchesne
    • Émile Durand
    • Guillaume Durocher
    • Mark Dyal
    • Guillaume Faye
    • Stephen Paul Foster
    • Fullmoon Ancestry
    • Jim Goad
    • Tom Goodrich
    • Alex Graham
    • Mark Gullick
    • Andrew Hamilton
    • Robert Hampton
    • Huntley Haverstock
    • Derek Hawthorne
    • Gregory Hood
    • Juleigh Howard-Hobson
    • Richard Houck
    • Alexander Jacob
    • Nicholas R. Jeelvy
    • Greg Johnson
    • Ruuben Kaalep
    • Tobias Langdon
    • Julian Langness
    • Travis LeBlanc
    • Patrick Le Brun
    • Trevor Lynch
    • Kevin MacDonald
    • G. A. Malvicini
    • John Michael McCloughlin
    • Margot Metroland
    • Millennial Woes
    • John Morgan
    • James J. O'Meara
    • Michael O'Meara
    • Christopher Pankhurst
    • Michael Polignano
    • J. J. Przybylski
    • Spencer J. Quinn
    • Quintilian
    • Edouard Rix
    • C. B. Robertson
    • C. F. Robinson
    • Hervé Ryssen
    • Kathryn S.
    • Alan Smithee
    • Fenek Solère
    • Ann Sterzinger
    • Thomas Steuben
    • Robert Steuckers
    • Tomislav Sunić
    • Donald Thoresen
    • Marian Van Court
    • Dominique Venner
    • Irmin Vinson
    • Michael Walker
    • Aylmer Wedgwood
    • Scott Weisswald
    • Leo Yankevich

    Classic Authors

    • Maurice Bardèche
    • Julius Evola
    • Ernst Jünger
    • D. H. Lawrence
    • Charles Lindbergh
    • Jack London
    • H. P. Lovecraft
    • Anthony M. Ludovici
    • Sir Oswald Mosley
    • National Vanguard
    • Friedrich Nietzsche
    • Revilo Oliver
    • William Pierce
    • Ezra Pound
    • Saint-Loup
    • Savitri Devi
    • Carl Schmitt
    • Miguel Serrano
    • Oswald Spengler
    • P. R. Stephensen
    • Jean Thiriart
    • John Tyndall
    • Francis Parker Yockey
  • Departments

    • Book Reviews
    • Movie Reviews
    • TV Reviews
    • Music Reviews
    • Art Criticism
    • Graphic Novels & Comics
    • Video Game Reviews
    • Fiction
    • Poems
    • Interviews
    • Videos
    • English Translations
    • Other Languages
      • Arabic
      • Bulgarian
      • Croatian
      • Czech
      • Danish
      • Dutch
      • Estonian
      • Finnish
      • French
      • German
      • Greek
      • Hungarian
      • Italian
      • Lithuanian
      • Norwegian
      • Polish
      • Portuguese
      • Romanian
      • Russian
      • Slovak
      • Spanish
      • Swedish
      • Ukrainian
    • Commemorations
    • Why We Write
  • Archives
  • Top 100 Commenters
  • Private Events
  • T&C
  • Contact
Sponsored Links
Above Time Coffee Antelope Hill Publishing Paul Waggener IHR-Store Asatru Folk Assembly Breakey Imperium Press American Renaissance The Patrick Ryan Show Jim Goad The Occidental Observer
Print July 11, 2022 12 comments

The Scientific Basis of Genetic Identity Politics

Aylmer Wedgwood

4,221 words

Abstract

Previously, I have established the importance of essences in defining an identity and also introduced genes as essentialist particles. The purpose of this article is to update our concepts of human variation by bringing it in line with modern science. This is an important task, as contemporary academia either hides this knowledge via obscurantism or outright lies about it.

Consequently, those sympathetic to our cause have to rely on either amateurs or old textbooks with information that hasn’t been updated for many decades. The result is that our ideas suffer from a legitimacy crisis in the public’s eyes. To address this shortcoming, here I will provide a concise reference text for a more modern model of human variation that reveals the essentialist forces that generate our identity. Modern genomics will help to provide a principled moral and scientific basis for deriving a form that will meet the criteria of essentialism, robustness against deconstructionist attacks, and the requirement that it scales to the millions. Drawing only on mainstream science, I will show that these essential prior forms manifest via distinct axes of genetic variation, which may be used to derive a single quantity to determine group identity.

Fig 1 Global human genetic variation.

We need a precise and objective definition of who we are, as we live in a highly moralistic society. To win over the public, we will need to convince them that our position is a moral one since it is based on the truth. This will be extremely difficult, as the idea of a kinship-based group identity has been the subject of over half a century of slander. Modernists have systematically undermined any such position by claiming that it would be both scientifically and morally wrong. The rehabilitation of this concept will require drawing on some of the latest advances in genetics, which will make this article more technical than any of my previous ones. It is necessary to get more technical, as identity and morality in this century will be intertwined with science far more than ever before.

As I argued previously, science has moved so far in our direction over the past two decades that it is now possible to express everything we believe in without having to venture outside the mainstream. This is a vastly preferable alternative to having to rely on controversial scientists, as this will make our position far more robust. This way we won’t have to defend facts, only interpretations. Thus, everything I am about to share here will only draw on mainstream, high-impact, peer-reviewed science journals.

The genetic basis of identity politics

You can buy Greg Johnson’s White Identity Politics here.

I expect that those reading this article already have a sense that there is something innately different between groups of people of various ancestries, and that genes are somehow involved. Most of you will not know the details of this or how to articulate the nature of this difference, however. In the following I will present the relevant minimum knowledge of genetics needed to appreciate human variation.

The human genome consists of around three billion nucleotide bases. Our DNA is organized into close to 20,000 recognized genes, which are regions of the genome that serve a common function, for example to encode molecules or to regulate the behavior of other genes.

The information encoded in these structures determines our physical and mental traits, up to the degree that these are heritable, which is now recognized to be very high for a great many phenotypes.[1] Out of the three billion bases, we already know that close to 100 million of them can vary between people,[2] and as we keep sequencing more individuals, we keep discovering ever more variation.[3] These sites (loci) of the genome exist in alternative forms at different frequencies, which are called alleles. These alleles are most commonly single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), or alternatively they may be multi-nucleotide variants. Thus, when someone talks about having a different “gene for X”, this is colloquial, as they usually refer to having an alternative allele for a shorter variant, usually just an SNP, rather than an entirely different gene.

Population structure and genetic variation

The foundation of genetic identity politics is the realization that the aforementioned over 100 million variants’ frequencies present in our species differ between populations, thus making them systematically more or less genetically similar to each other.

This population structure across many loci can be revealed via dimensionality reduction techniques, which show how millions of variants form systematic patterns. There are many such techniques that all reveal similar prior structures, however. The most popular classical way to do this is via Principal Component Analysis (PCA). PCA is a mathematical method for identifying the largest sources of variation in a dataset, which is accomplished by summarizing the axes of variation into a reduced set of orthogonal variables (see the Appendix for more details). PCA thus distills vast amounts of genetic variation into a few meaningful variables that capture the essences of human variation. These values are called Principal Components (PCs), and populations are routinely visualized via scatter plots of the first few PCs. Visualizing the space described by the first two PCs, which usually explain ~10% of the total variance that differentiates continental populations,[4] will produce an image similar to Fig 1.[5] In turn, visualizing the third and fourth PCs will produce an image similar to Fig 2, which reveals finer population structure within continents. While usually only the top few PCs are presented, in fact up to several hundred PCs could capture meaningful variation in a diverse population.[6]

Fig 2 Higher PCs reveal finer scale population structure.

The meaning of PCA

So, what do these plots and quantities mean conceptually? Although frequently generated, the actual meaning of these plots is rarely explored. Considering them in detail will provide the starting points for our new model for human variation, however.

The X and Y axes of these plots are the PCs I have described above, and the colored dots are the individuals in the study. There are two very important observations that arise from this. First, the individuals and groups that are spatially closer to each other in the plot are genetically more similar to each other across their entire genome than individuals further away (on those PCs). Second, the X and Y axes are obviously perpendicular, which is due to the orthogonal nature of PCA. This fact is of particular importance, which will be highlighted momentarily.

The PCs themselves can be thought of as the essences of populations. The fact that each person is made up from many such PCs reveals us to be more akin to a harmony, rather than essences as according to Plato’s unitary definition of a soul. However, the PCs themselves still satisfy the definition of an essence as they represent the underlying fundamental nature of what a population is. The fact that we are made up of multiple such essences also takes care of Aristotle’s critique of Platonic forms (which is based on the observation that single objects could have many essences), without undermining the essentialist basis of a genetic identity.

Human genetic variation and essentialism

One of the main allegedly required properties of essentialist identities is a sense of discreteness. In other words, homogeneous identities ought to manifest as non-overlapping discrete types. This is clearly not the case for humans, as all populations show continuous variation, where the different clines smoothly blend into each other. As this point is the basis of the most popular anti-essentialist argument used against us today,[7] this problem deserves special attention.

To resolve this issue, consider the fact that the PCs are orthogonal, i.e. at right angles to each other. Orthogonality can be considered as an adequate substitute for discreteness, as these are conceptually related properties given that they both imply a discontinuous change in variation. So while a discrete population of Europeans or Africans may not exist, we can still recognize that someone is essentially “more European” or “more African” in relation to others, as the axes of these variations were defined orthogonally. To appreciate this, consider Fig 3, which visually demonstrates orthogonality as essential variation through the well-known rainbow metaphor.

Fig 3 PCA of genetic variation colorized by distance from the three population centers.

The above plot shows the same global genetic differentiation of the previous dataset with individuals colored by their distance to their population centroids (these will be defined later). The PCs represent orthogonal change, yet the resulting variation results in a smooth gradient. From the fact that these two properties are simultaneously true, we can conclude that a smooth blending does not invalidate the existence of essentially different colors, or peoples.

The scale of human variation

I have shown that given the known patterns of genetic variation, individuals are essentially different, and that within a descent group, people are more similar to each other than to outgroups. This is already a significant result, as most of the public aren’t even aware of this. Some even believe that two Europeans could be less genetically similar to each other than either of them to someone from Africa, which should now be clear could never happen. We still haven’t addressed the question of scale, however. What is the scale of this similarity? How important is that 10%, within continental similarity? It certainly looks a lot smaller than the 90% where everyone is different. The mainstream view is that even if the pattern of similarity is how I described it, it does not matter, as any differences are so small that they must be trivial. After all, aren’t we all over 99% genetically the same?

First of all, the fact that we are all over 99% identical is relative. We may all be very similar relative to a non-human species, but from our own point of view, only the fraction where two humans can differ matters, as only those parts of the genome could contribute to human variation. This remaining fraction is what makes our children resemble us to the extent that they do, which is appreciably greater than a random member of the population. Thus, if you consider your resemblance to your relatives important, then global human genetic variation is non-trivial for the very same reasons as well.

Second, that 10% figure is outdated. More modern methods that can model natural populations with internal structure reveal global human genetic differentiation to be far higher, at 26%. But how important is that 26% in actuality? Can we put these numbers into perspective to make them more relatable? To do this, I will first have to briefly introduce the technical version of kinship. Genetic kinship is a probabilistic metric for genetic similarity between two individuals, with a series of established thresholds for known relationships. For example, kinship coefficients of 0.5, 0.25, and 0.125 refer to identical twins, first degree, and second degree relatives, respectively.

But what does this have to do with population structure? The aforementioned global genetic differentiation, the 26% of variance figure, is measured on the same scale as kinship.[9] Thus, that 26% figure actually suggests a stronger than first degree relationship. Let me repeat this in another way to make it absolutely clear. Two randomly-picked individuals from across the globe are as different from each other genetically as you are similar to your own children, parents, or siblings. So instead of it being trivial, human genetic variation is actually quite substantial.

Why does genetic differentiation matter?

So far, we have established that individuals genetically resemble their descent groups at a scale similar to that of close relatives. But why does it matter that the chemicals in our cells are potentially more similar within a population than between them?

It is important since genomic relatedness shows a roughly linear relationship with phenotypic similarity[10] within a population. Thus, basic quantitative genetic theory predicts that if populations show a genetic differentiation of a similar magnitude to first degree relatives, then one would expect their phenotypic differentiation to be of the same scale as well. This will hold true as long as the traits in question have a non-zero heritability.

You can buy Greg Johnson’s The White Nationalist Manifesto here

For a single trait, the phenotypic differentiation would be expected to be proportionate to the genetic variance attributable to ancestry (26%). From this we could conclude that, for one (selectively neutral) trait, the expected distributions between populations would overlap.[11] Once all phenotypes are considered across the full spectrum of personality traits, however, the populations would become more differentiated. The overall pattern of phenotypic variation would therefore be expected to approximate the structure revealed by the genetic PCA plots.

The above may sound obscure, so I hope that the following concrete example will clarify it. Many academics focus on IQ, which is an undoubtedly important trait. Cognition is just the tip of the iceberg, however. Currently, we cannot yet say with certainty how much of the IQ differences between ancestries are due to genetic causes. In any case, the mean difference in IQ scores is small enough that population distributions of the genetic endowment for intelligence would overlap, anyway. However, if we expand beyond IQ to consider the whole person, by taking all phenotypes jointly, the overlap in overall phenotypic similarity will decrease as a function of the overall genetic differentiation with the addition of each new trait.

The fact that groups of people that are substantially genetically different will therefore also inevitably result in that they will be, on the whole, substantially phenotypically different as well.

The correspondence between genetic population structure and self-identified ethnic labels

So far we have established that patterns of population structure create genetic similarity, and that this in turn creates phenotypic similarity. But to connect any of this to politics, we will need to examine the correspondence between the genetic identities revealed so far and popular labels for ethnic identities. For example, is there any genetic basis for being “black” or “white”?

First, we have to clarify that the patterns we have identified so far are prior forms, independent of any labels the researchers may attach to them later. This is an important fact, as certain anti-essentialist attacks on these identities are based on the postmodern idea that the patterns in such data are somehow inserted by the researcher, or perhaps they were created by the model’s parameters.[12] These arguments exemplify the postmodern fallacy, which asserts that there is no objective reality independent of the observer. This is categorically false. You can also verify this yourself, as I have included all the relevant technical details needed to show that the model is entirely agnostic (see the Appendix).

Depending on how the populations were sampled, the order and the details of the estimated PCs may vary in a given study, but across all studies the same PCs are revealed as the natural essences of these populations’ a priori forms. The name of the labels attached to them are of course arbitrary, but they are just names for pre-existing patterns, which can be anything. In practice they follow commonsensical rules, and tend to correspond to the study participants’ ancestral origins.

What about self-identified ethnic labels? A common naïve criticism is that there is no relationship between what people identify as and their genetic ancestry. This is, of course, also false. Barring individual exceptions of edge cases, what people believe themselves to be also tend to closely follow the underlying genetic patterns. Here is a plot that overlays a histogram of the participants’ self-identified ethnicity with the first two PCs:[13]

Fig 4 The association between genetic variation and ethnic labels.

The above should convince anyone that there is a strong, broad correspondence between popular ethnic labels and the underlying genetic population structure. Of course, common sense dictates that the former was derived from the latter via a process of thresholding continuous variation into discrete categories. The fact that the lines for black or white would be drawn differently in different cultures — for example, in Brazil the “one drop rule” is much relaxed — would simply imply that a different thresholding scheme was applied to the same underlying prior structures. As I argued beforehand, the reality of human genetic differences is invariant to error-prone human perceptions; thus, calling the same thing by different terms does not alter the prior facts at all.

Thus, we should not find it surprising that people who believe themselves to be black are predominantly genetically African and those individuals who self-identify as white are mostly genetically European.

Determining individual genetic identity

The one remaining important objective is to derive a scheme to quantify an arbitrary individual’s genetic identity. At last, this is actually a straightforward task, which has been performed thousands of times in virtually all genetic studies that involved large populations.[14]

In brief, the way this is usually accomplished is by computing a centroid for each reference population as an ideal against which participants will then be measured. A centroid is simply the average (or median) of all individuals in the reference population computed across all PCs. Conceptually, a centroid can be thought of as the Platonic essence of a population; that is, the “ideal type.” One can therefore obtain the genetic identity of any individual by simply measuring their genetic distance from their nearest population centroid(s), and determine their identity as belonging to one or more of the reference populations at a given percentage.

To illustrate this graphically, consider the three example centroids shown as (1), (2), and (3) in Fig 4. The individuals closest to (1), (2), and (3) are the most European, African, and East Asian persons, respectively. In turn, individuals near (A), who are in an intermediate position between the centroids (1) and (2) along the European-African cline, have a genetic identity correspondingly intermediate between the aforementioned two. The real calculation is only slightly more complex, as that would factor in the rest of the PCs as well. On the whole, however, determining genetic identity is a relatively simple, intuitive process.

In closing, I will also have to address two philosophical concerns. The first is the charge that computing genetic identity as a single number would be “reductionism.” In fact, dimensionality reduction is in many ways quite the opposite of moral reductionism. Moral reductionism would be to attempt to determine our form via a few, potentially superficial properties. In contrast, the process I described here reveals a form that draws on our whole genome, which captures our essence as shaped by hundreds of thousands of years of evolution. To see beneath the apparent chaos and to identify the essences that motivate our underlying true nature, dimensionality reduction is not a hazard, but a requirement. Thus, the accusation of moral reductionism is baseless.

The second concern is that identifying our form via genes would be a type of materialism. This is also an inappropriate way to think about our identity. A better way to approach this issue is via the recognition of the continuum that exists between matter and higher-order abstractions like culture. According to this view, such higher-order phenomena are the emergent properties of their lower-order bases. This recognition of a continuity is in contrast to modernity’s dualism, which falsely believes that our culture and civilization could continue to exist after cutting it off from its biological roots.

Conclusion

We have now developed a more modern, scientific understanding of human variation. This can be summarized by the following four points:

  1. Individuals are always more genetically similar to their own descent groups than to outgroups.
  2. As genes are essentialist particles, and that variation is orthogonal, (1) is true in an immutable, essentialist sense.
  3. The magnitude of global human genetic variation is on the same order as similarity between first degree relatives.
  4. This genetic similarity is also expected to generate corresponding phenotypic similarity of a similar magnitude.

The state-of-the-art process outlined in this article can be deployed to identify the essences of our form, even down to a sub-population level. It can be used to distinguish Poles from Brits and the Brits from Italians, all of whom can be clearly distinguished from foreign forms such as Ashkenazi or African populations. It may seem like an arduous, overly complicated process to derive something that everyone feels they instinctively know already. However, there is a world of difference in the end result: The above derivation yields an entirely objective and morally sound identity that may be replicated with ease. Scaling it to millions of individuals via automation can therefore be a simple, straightforward process. Thus, unlike anything that has ever existed before, this identity will hold, and may become the gold standard for membership in large groups or organizations.

The moral and social implications of genetics are at the center of our culture’s blind spot today. A combination of profound ignorance and phobia of heredity is at the root of all the problems that plague our societies. The general public, and especially the intelligentsia, refuse to acknowledge the power of the genome and the fact that genes exert such a dominant force on the human condition. But once they come around, combined with the fact that every living person will know their true genetic identity, these developments will transform politics beyond all recognition. Indeed, if the facts in this article were more widely known, many of our troubles would disappear within a few years.

While it may take another generation for this knowledge to reach the general public, most of the technology is already available to us today. For less than a hundred dollars you can obtain your own genetic information and start to familiarize yourself with the ecosystem of consumer genomics. In a future installment of this series, I will go further and show you how to obtain and interpret your genetic identity from personal genomics companies, and what you will be able to do with it today and in the coming years.

Appendix: PCA method details

To perform PCA, both the individuals and the genetic variants selected must be appropriately chosen.[15] The n individuals must be unrelated and representative of the full genetic diversity of all populations, which should be of comparable sizes. In turn, the p variants have to be in linkage equilibrium and large in number to cover the entire genome (routinely over 100,000 or more). This then forms an n x p matrix (X) of genetic data with individuals on n rows and the genetic variants in p columns. Next, K, the pairwise variant similarity matrix is calculated (K=XTX), which is a p x p matrix. This is then subjected to eigen decomposition (K=VDVT), which identifies the orthogonal axes of genetic variation, where V holds the eigenvectors in its p columns in decreasing importance, and D are its corresponding eigenvalues. Finally, to obtain the Principal Components (PCs), denoted as Z, the individuals are “projected” into this space via a multiplication of their genetic data by the eigenvectors (Z=XV).[16] The first two columns of Z correspond to PC1 and PC2, the third and fourth to PC3 and PC4, and so forth. Visualizing these as scatter plots will produce images similar to Fig1 and Fig2.

*  *  *

Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.

  • First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
  • Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “Paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
  • Third, Paywall members have the ability to edit their comments. 
  • Fourth, Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)

To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:

Paywall Gift Subscriptions

If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:

  • your payment
  • the recipient’s name
  • the recipient’s email address
  • your name
  • your email address

To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.

Notes

[1] Polderman TJC, Benyamin B, de Leeuw CA, Sullivan PF, van Bochoven A, Visscher PM, et al. Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics. 2015 May 18;47(7):702–9.

[2] The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium: A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015 Sep 30;526(7571):68–74.

[3] Sherman RM, Forman J, Antonescu V, Puiu D, Daya M, Rafaels N, et al. Assembly of a pan-genome from deep sequencing of 910 humans of African descent. Nature Genetics. 2018 Nov 19;51(1):30–5.

[4] Hunley KL, Cabana GS, Long JC. The apportionment of human diversity revisited. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2015 Dec 1;160(4):561–9.

[5] Privé F, Aschard H, Carmi S, Folkersen L, Hoggart C, O’Reilly PF, et al. Portability of 245 polygenic scores when derived from the UK Biobank and applied to 9 ancestry groups from the same cohort. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2022 Jan;109(1):12–23.

[6] Wainschtein P, Jain D, Zheng Z, Aslibekyan S, Becker D, Bi W, et al. Assessing the contribution of rare variants to complex trait heritability from whole-genome sequence data. Nature Genetics. 2022 Mar;54(3):263–73.

[7] Lewis ACF, Molina SJ, Appelbaum PS, Dauda B, Di Rienzo A, Fuentes A, et al. Getting genetic ancestry right for science and society. Science. 2022 Apr 15;376(6590):250–2.

[8] Ochoa A, Storey JD. New kinship and FST estimates reveal higher levels of differentiation in the global human population. 2019 May 30; bioRxiv doi:10.1101/653279.

[9] Balding DJ. Likelihood-based inference for genetic correlation coefficients. Theoretical Population Biology. 2003 May;63(3):221–30.

[10] Kemper KE, Yengo L, Zheng Z, Abdellaoui A, Keller MC, Goddard ME, et al. Phenotypic covariance across the entire spectrum of relatedness for 86 billion pairs of individuals. Nature Communications. 2021 Feb 16;12(1).

[11] Edge MD, Rosenberg NA. Implications of the apportionment of human genetic diversity for the apportionment of human phenotypic diversity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 2015 Aug;52:32–45.

[12] Winther RG. The Genetic Reification of “Race”? A Story of Two Mathematical Methods. Critical Philosophy of Race. 2014;2((2):204-223).

[13] Loh P-R, Genovese G, McCarroll SA. Monogenic and polygenic inheritance become instruments for clonal selection. Nature. 2020 Jun 24;584(7819):136–41.

[14] Buniello A, MacArthur JA, Cerezo M, Harris LW, Hayhurst J, Malangone C, et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019. Nucleic Acids Research [Internet]. 2018 Nov 16;47(D1):D1005–12.

[15] Privé F, Luu K, Blum MGB, McGrath JJ, Vilhjálmsson BJ. Efficient toolkit implementing best practices for principal component analysis of population genetic data. Bioinformatics. 2020 Aug 15; 36(16):4449-4457. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa520. PMID: 32415959; PMCID: PMC7750941

[16] Abegaz F, Chaichoompu K, Génin E, Fardo DW, König IR, Mahachie John JM, et al. Principals about principal components in statistical genetics. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2018 Sep 14;20(6):2200–16.

Related

  • Frank Salter’s On Genetic Interests

  • Karl Pearson’s “The Groundwork of Eugenics”

  • Comparing Monogamous & Polygamous Men, Part 1:
    Race, Ancestry, Character Traits, & Physical Characteristics

  • John Locke’s Blank Slate & the Unique Development of Children’s Literature in the West

  • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 497
    The Writers’ Bloc with James O’Meara on Better Call Saul

  • Stolypin vs. Bogrov:
    etnonacionalistické motivy v Solženicynově Srpnu 1914

  • Queen of the World

  • Southern Nationalism:
    An Interview with Padraig Martin of Identity Dixie

Tags

Aylmer WedgwoodDNAessentialismethnic labelsgenesgenetic differentiationgenetic identity politicsgenetic variationgeneticshuman variationidentityidentity politicskinship groupsracial essentialism

Previous

« Remembering Carl Schmitt
(July 11, 1888–April 7, 1985)

Next

» Contemplating Suicide

12 comments

  1. James J. O'Meara says:
    July 11, 2022 at 9:27 am

    Applying ctrl-F to this article and its predecessor reveals no occurrence of “Darwin” and only two of “evolution”, both only in the last paragraph above. My question is: Traditionalists from Guenon to Huston Smith and E. Schumacher have attacked Darwinism precisely because they claim it replaces ideal Platonic essences (which link us vertically to the Transcendent, e.g. the Realm of Ideas) with contingent, randomly (horizontally) developing material forms.

    An “essence as shaped by hundreds of thousands of years of evolution” is to them a contradiction in terms. An essence is what it is, and not another thing. And this seems to be exactly what the Left believes: whatever is being “shaped” by evolution is if not a blank slate then a randomly squished ball of wax.

    This may be tangential to your goals but since you seem to use “essence” in a way that is compatible with genetics, can you comment on this issue? TIA.

    1. AylmerWedgwood says:
      July 13, 2022 at 6:28 pm

      Identity is a state, evolution is a process. The former is easy to measure and prove, the latter is speculative and hard to show. But it’s true, it is easier to convince others of the importance of human variation if you can explain the whys too, as it is in human nature to expect to be told an origin story too.

      However, from a political perspective, it is only identity all that matters, irrespective of how we obtained it. As it is identity that generates common goals, and common political will. Evolution is the mechanism which generated it, but once you conditioned on knowing the difference the mechanism itself becomes irrelevant.

      To put it in another way, if you could show that the gene variants responsible for higher intelligence are more or less common outside of Africa, would you still need to know why they were differently distributed? It doesn’t matter if it was due to cold winters or a multiregional origin. In fact, basing your position on an evolutionary theory like cold winters weakens your identity, as that is almost impossible to prove, and others could come up with equally plausible stories that undermine yours. It is stronger to simply state that we are different just because we are genetically different without trying to support it with speculative theories.

      With respect to your comment about essences vs genetics. There are essences of different orders, which may be nested into each other hierarchically.
      The lowest order essence, and the only truly pure “Platonic” type of essence, is the individual gene variant. This is because a variant is non-overlapping and discrete, you either have it or you don’t. However, an individual is made up from many genes, so we are generated by multiple essences, which creates a smoother distribution. But this does not mean that the individual essentialist particles, the genes, would be any less important. On the contrary, one of the key arguments in the article was this: if we are made up from many such essentialist particles then the final result will still be essentialist. (For a technical perspective see Fisher’s 1918 paper which shows that Mendelian genetics turns into complex trait genetics once you consider multiple genes).

      As I argued in the article, just because groups of peoples blend into each other at the edges does not invalidate the essential differences between them, for the same reason why blending red and green does not invalidate the essential differences between these two colors.

  2. Dorfmann says:
    July 11, 2022 at 12:44 pm

    Just want to reiterate the point that just because two groups might overlap on a PCA doesn’t mean they have the same ancestral origins.  For example, a Mexican with Amerindian and European admixture might overlap with a Pakistani or an African-American with West African and European admixture might overlap with a Kenyan.

    1. AylmerWedgwood says:
      July 13, 2022 at 6:19 pm

      This is only true for the top few PCs, which is what most people tend to focus on. But once you look at the higher PCs, they will reveal that even those populations differentiate. For example, in PC1/2 the Askhenazi population appears undifferentiated from the Europeans, but on PC4, they clearly separate. The populations you mentioned may get differentiated in one or more of the many PCs that come after the first 4.

      However, you brought up an important point, which is ancestry vs identity. People have a real hard time differentiating these two. As it is true, someone from north Africa and someone who has one black and one white parent will be genetically similar. They will share approximately the same identity, and therefore similar political interests (or lack of) with a white person. I will elaborate on this more in my next article.

  3. Tom says:
    July 11, 2022 at 2:44 pm

    Thanks.  Now my brain hurts and I’ve done both Integration by Parts (mathematical torture) and the Classic method of solving 2nd Order differentials (useless mathematical torture given Laplace Transforms)

    Owwww!!!

    1. AylmerWedgwood says:
      July 13, 2022 at 6:17 pm

      I know this is difficult, and it is a major challenge in identity politics to make these concepts relatable in a way that does not betray the science while allowing the non-expert to connect with it. It is a work in progress and in a future article I will suggest some ways to translate the substance of this article into practice.

  4. Vehmgericht says:
    July 11, 2022 at 2:53 pm

    I think the counterargument is not to deny that certain clusters of genetic traits align with the classical ‘races’, but to point out that not *all* distributions of alleles do so. I seem to remember Cavalli-Sforza (or a disciple thereof) noting that clines in blood groups show no correspondence with ‘races’, and therefore the so designated population groups cannot be monophyletic and are not clades. In effect, he says, we are cherry picking meaningless traits that happen to be easily identifiable and that cluster geographically, slapping the term ‘races’ on them and making unwarranted inferences from that. I do not posses a sufficient understanding of cladistics and phylogenetics to evaluate these arguments: perhaps someone here could do so for me?

    1. Jesse M. says:
      July 12, 2022 at 11:31 am

      Another possible criticism is that the genetic differences that these studies are looking at might be mainly a consequence of genetic drift/neutral evolution — DNA variations that have neither positive nor negative effects on fitness, so that which variant comes to dominate in a given population is a largely random matter — as opposed to genes under selection. The article at https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/neutral-theory-the-null-hypothesis-of-molecular-839/ seems to say the dominant view nowadays is that neutral evolution is the main cause of genetic divergence between populations (not just within species but also between different animal species).

      If that’s the case than the cluster structure seen in the kinds of studies discussed in this post may be a fairly predictable result of different levels of gene flow between sub-populations of humans due to geographic separation. The paper at https://sci-hub.se/10.1371/journal.pone.0192460 ran a simulation of neutral evolution based on current thinking about how humans spread across the globe over the last 132,000 years, and then did principal component analysis on the simulated genes of the different populations, and got results that match up fairly well to real data, see fig. 3 on page 8.

      Would be interesting to know if there have been any studies that tried to look exclusively at genes from regions of the the genome that seem to have been under selection (from what I understand there are statistical signatures of selection they can use to try to determine this), and applied the same sort of principal component analysis to those genes in particular.

      1. AylmerWedgwood says:
        July 13, 2022 at 6:15 pm

        Looking at the entire genome, which includes both functional and non-functional parts, is more robust than trying to narrow down to functional variation. The whole genone considers total similarity, and you don’t need to know more than that to validate this platform. The same reasons that you only need to know that you share 50% more genes with your children than with the rest of the population. And from this you will also know that you will, on the whole, resemble each other accordingly, without having to know which variants have a function and which ones don’t. Evolutionary theory is once again an irrelevant distraction here.

    2. AylmerWedgwood says:
      July 13, 2022 at 6:16 pm

      In the pre genomic era, when only a few genes (or proteins) were considered, indeed, they found some discordance between variants (eg blood groups) and people’s ancestral origins, as most variants only differ by a few percentage points in allele frequencies across the globe. But this is Lewontin’s fallacy: it is not individual gene variants you care about, but all of them, jointly. This is illustrated by the PCA plots in the article, which show that once you look at genome-wide patterns of similarity, overall variation does line up with popular labels of ancestry (see Fig 4)

  5. James Dunphy says:
    July 15, 2022 at 7:52 am

    1. “The fact that each person is made up from many such PCs reveals us to be more akin to a harmony, rather than essences as according to Plato’s unitary definition of a soul.”

    I agree. The sounds (variants) make up the instruments (traits), which permit an orchestra (race) that actualizes/inspires the genre (culture).

    2. “Conceptually, a centroid can be thought of as the Platonic essence of a population; that is, the “ideal type.”

    Sounds like a golden mean. Since more dots appear near the centroid, does this mean that more people reproduce at the ethnic group’s golden mean? What are the golden mean or centroid forces keeping whites white but also perhaps preventing them from evolving to be more intelligent, creative, honest, humble, healthy, etc? In other words, is the golden mean all that golden?

    3. Have you heard of high-level control Hox genes, where editing one single gene changes the impact of an entire trait or set of traits? For example, researchers changed a fly’s head shape by switching in a variant from another species. Generally, are gene variants controlling the expression of sets of genes more common as principal components than variants contributing with others just a little to one trait? Is this why we sometimes see in mixed race populations a stronger slant toward one race or another among siblings? For example, one Mexican resembling an Iberian and his brother, an Olmec?
    https://www.biotechniques.com/crispr/how-do-hox-genes-control-the-way-we-look/

    1. AylmerWedgwood says:
      August 24, 2022 at 5:49 pm

      2. This is a hard question about evolution, but it is not relevant to politics! In any case, the centroid may have been the most adaptive at a time. Of course, just because it was the most fit at that time it does not mean that they would be the most fit for all times in the future. But as I said, the basis of genetic identity politics isn’t evolution. It is based purely on identity, so it does not depend on anything else, which may be hard or impossible to prove like evolution.

      The person nearest the centroid is just the mean, the average type. But if you wanted to live in a fair political system, you would want to be represented by someone who is as close to the group’s mean as possible, so they would have the most intrinsic motivation to act in the interest of their constituents. Genetic identity politics just says this: you have the right to be represented by those who are like you. This is also the basis of the irreconcilable conflict in the US: Obama was a good match for the new average American, but not a good fit for the founding population. This is also why the US cannot be one country anymore: it is no longer possible to elect representatives who can act in the interest of the whole country fairly.

      3. HOX genes are involved in development, and they aren’t generally speaking variable within the human population (they vary between species instead). People of mixed ancestry vary due to they having a different subset of alleles that are representative of their parent populations. Some phenotypes are controlled by fewer variants, thus just by chance someone with mixed ancestry could have more alleles that are representative of one of their parents. This could easily happen with something superficial like skin color.

Comments are closed.

If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.

Note on comments privacy & moderation

Your email is never published nor shared.

Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.

  • Recent posts

    • Limited Edition Clearance Sale

      Greg Johnson

    • Remembering Charles Lindbergh

      Anthony Bavaria

    • Spencer J. Quinn Interviewed About The No College Club

      Spencer J. Quinn

    • Black Invention Myths

      Black Invention Myths

      2

    • Race War in the Outback

      Jim Goad

      27

    • A Woman’s Guide to Identifying Psychopaths, Part 7 More of the Most Common Jobs for Psychopaths

      James Dunphy

    • Black History Month Resources

      Greg Johnson

      6

    • 40% Off Selected Titles

      Cyan Quinn

      5

    • The Union Jackal, January 2023

      Mark Gullick

      3

    • Spencer J. Quinn’s The No College Club: A Review

      Anthony Bavaria

      7

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 521 Daily Zoomer & Spencer J. Quinn Discuss The No College Club

      Counter-Currents Radio

      1

    • Everything Whites Do Is Bad . . . According to the Mainstream Media

      Beau Albrecht

      13

    • Guillermo del Toro’s Pinocchio

      Margot Metroland

      7

    • American Krogan on Louis C. K. Advocating for Open Borders

      American Krogan

      11

    • Traditional French Songs from Le Poème Harmonique

      Alex Graham

      1

    • The Worst Week Yet: January 22-28, 2023

      Jim Goad

      25

    • Sports Cars & Small Penises

      Richard Houck

      29

    • Opiates for America’s Heartland

      Morris van de Camp

      12

    • The Whale

      Steven Clark

      3

    • Are Qur’an-Burnings Helpful?

      Nicholas R. Jeelvy

      15

    • Bullet Train to Babylon

      Trevor Lynch

      7

    • The Wave: Fascism Reenacted in a High School

      Beau Albrecht

      6

    • Edred Thorsson a jeho kniha Historie Runové gildy

      Collin Cleary

    • Silicon Valley’s Anti-White Racial Dysgenics Program

      Jason Kessler

      32

    • The Silent Plague of Elderly Asian Mass Shooters in California

      Jim Goad

      36

    • What Went Wrong with America’s Universities?

      Stephen Paul Foster

      3

    • Greg Johnson Speaks to Horus the Avenger About Charles Krafft

      Greg Johnson

      5

    • A Woman’s Guide to Identifying Psychopaths, Part 6 The Most Common Jobs for Psychopaths

      James Dunphy

      13

    • Davos, or the Technocrats’ Ball

      Mark Gullick

      5

    • A Political Prisoner on the Meaning of January 6

      Morris van de Camp

      3

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 520 Inside Serbia with Marko of Zentropa

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • The $50 Million Conservative Inc. Internet Spat

      Spencer J. Quinn

      15

    • Yet Another Woke Remake of a Classic

      Beau Albrecht

      25

    • Spencer J. Quinn & Pox Populi Discuss The No College Club

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 4: “Multitudes” Against the People

      Alain de Benoist

    • The Worst Week Yet: January 15-21, 2023

      Jim Goad

      35

    • Q&A with Jim Goad on The Redneck Manifesto

      Jason Kessler

      3

    • Against Political Hipsterism

      Nicholas R. Jeelvy

      6

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 3: “Multitudes” Against the People

      Alain de Benoist

    • Against White Unionism

      Greg Johnson

      7

    • Hitchcock vs. Visconti

      Derek Hawthorne

      9

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 2: “Multitudes” Against the People

      Alain de Benoist

    • Public Transit in Multicultural Hell

      Gunnar Alfredsson

      12

    • No, You Wasn’t Kings

      Jim Goad

      36

    • The 2022 Counter-Currents Fall Retreat James Edwards & Sam Dickson on White Nationalism in Electoral Politics

      James Edwards & Sam Dickson

      1

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 11, Part 1: “Multitudes” Against the People

      Alain de Benoist

      1

    • On the Christian Question

      David Lewis

      78

    • Physician, Heal Thyself: The Persecution of Jordan Peterson

      Mark Gullick

      22

    • A Woman’s Guide to Identifying Psychopaths, Part 5 The Workplace

      James Dunphy

      1

    • The Secret of My Success

      Steven Clark

      2

  • Classics Corner

    • Remembering A. R. D. “Rex” Fairburn (February 2, 1904–March 25, 1957)

      Greg Johnson

      1

    • Denis Kearney & the Struggle for a White America

      Theodore J. O'Keefe

      1

    • Posthuman Prospects:
      Artificial Intelligence, Fifth Generation Warfare, & Archeofuturism

      Christopher Pankhurst

      5

    • Earnest Sevier Cox:
      Advocate for the White Ethnostate

      Morris van de Camp

      15

    • Remembering Jack London
      (January 12, 1876–November 22, 1916)

      Greg Johnson

      2

    • Remembering Robinson Jeffers:
      January 10, 1887–January 20, 1962

      John Morgan

      3

    • Remembering Pierre Drieu La Rochelle:
      January 3, 1893–March 15, 1945

      Greg Johnson

    • Remembering Rudyard Kipling (December 30, 1865-January 18, 1936)

      Greg Johnson

      10

    • Restoring White Homelands

      Greg Johnson

      34

    • Remembering Hinton Rowan Helper

      Spencer J. Quinn

      11

    • What’s Wrong with Diversity?

      Greg Johnson

      10

    • Redefining the Mainstream

      Greg Johnson

      3

    • Edward Alsworth Ross:
      American Metapolitical Hero

      Morris van de Camp

      8

    • The Talented Mr. Ripley & Purple Noon

      Trevor Lynch

      19

    • Christmas & the Yuletide:
      Light in the Darkness

      William de Vere

      3

    • Thanksgiving Special 
      White Men Meet Indians:
      Jamestown & the Clash of Civilizations

      Thomas Jackson

    • Colin Wilson’s The Outsider

      Sir Oswald Mosley

      4

    • Dostoyevsky on the Jews

      William Pierce

      4

    • Jefferson &/or Mussolini, Part 1

      Ezra Pound

      5

    • I Listened to Chapo Trap House So You Don’t Have To

      Doug Huntington

      98

    • The Homeric Gods

      Mark Dyal

      13

    • Toward a Baltic-Black Sea Union:
      “Intermarium” as a Viable Model for White Revival

      Émile Durand

      55

    • The Politics of Nuclear War, Part 3

      John Morgan

      30

    • The Politics of Nuclear War, Part 2

      John Morgan

      6

    • Columbus Day Special
      The Autochthony Argument

      Greg Johnson

      9

    • The Politics of Nuclear War, Part 1

      John Morgan

      8

    • The Jewish Question for Normies

      Alan Smithee

      13

    • Human Biodiversity for Normies

      Alan Smithee

      10

    • Bring Back Prohibition!

      Alan Smithee

      65

    • Ethnonationalism for Normies
      (Or, “On the Sense of Coming Home”)

      Alan Smithee

      8

  • Paroled from the Paywall

    • The French Emperor, the German Nutcracker, & the Russian Ballet Part 2

      Kathryn S.

      4

    • The French Emperor, the German Nutcracker, & the Russian Ballet Part 1

      Kathryn S.

    • Death on the Nile (1978 & 2022)

      Trevor Lynch

      13

    • Error & Pride

      Nicholas R. Jeelvy

      12

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 515 The Christmas Special

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 514 The Ghosts of Christmas Past, Present, & Yet to Come on The Writers’ Bloc

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Race & the Bible

      Morris van de Camp

      2

    • PK van der Byl, African Statesman

      Margot Metroland

      3

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 513 The Writers’ Bloc with Horus on the Implicit Whiteness of Liberalism

      Counter-Currents Radio

      4

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 512 Jim Goad on Answer Me!

      Counter-Currents Radio

      3

    • Cleese on Creativity

      Greg Johnson

      6

    • A Woman’s Guide to Identifying Psychopaths, Part 1 Diagnostic Criteria, Associated Personality Disorders, & Brain Attributes

      James Dunphy

      6

    • Death of a Gadfly:
      Plato’s Apology

      Mark Gullick

      1

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 8:
      Ernesto Laclau & Left-Wing Populism

      Alain de Benoist

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 511
      Christmas Lore with Hwitgeard on The Writers’ Bloc

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Bringing Guns to an Idea Fight:
      The Career of Robert DePugh

      Morris van de Camp

      4

    • War Is Our Father

      Gunnar Alfredsson

    • The Foremost Threat to Life on Earth

      James Dunphy

      2

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 510
      The Writers’ Bloc with Jason Kessler on the Kanye Question

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 509
      New Ask Me Anything with Greg Johnson

      Counter-Currents Radio

      6

    • The Problem of Gentile Zionism

      Nicholas R. Jeelvy

      1

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 7:
      Money & the Right

      Alain de Benoist

      2

    • The Populist Moment, Chapter 6:
      Liberalism & Morality

      Alain de Benoist

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 507
      The Best Month Ever on The Writers’ Bloc with Anthony Bavaria

      Counter-Currents Radio

    • Who Is Not Going to Save the Nation?

      Beau Albrecht

      4

    • J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Fall of Númenor

      Alex Graham

      3

    • The Most Overlooked Christmas Carols

      Buck Hunter

      4

    • Mirko Savage, Mother Europe’s Son

      Ondrej Mann

      3

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 506
      The Writers’ Bloc with Jim Goad on J. D. Vance’s Hillbilly Elegy

      Counter-Currents Radio

      2

    • Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 505
      Mark Weber on the Perils of Empire

      Counter-Currents Radio

      3

  • Recent comments

    • Jim Goad

      Race War in the Outback

      Ahem. "Yours," not "Your's."

    • Liam Kernaghan

      Race War in the Outback

      Jim, Fantastic as always! You can tell me to "Foxtrot Oscar" for being so pedantic if you like...

    • ArminiusMaximus

      Black Invention Myths

      Thank you for putting this together. It was fun to read these very brief synopsis of the history of...

    • Sherman McCoy

      Race War in the Outback

      All signs point to 'no'.

    • Lord Shang

      Race War in the Outback

      "among the best didgeridoo playing you'll ever hear" - I don't think I've ever laughed so hard at a...

    • Lord Shang

      Opiates for America’s Heartland

      Thank you for that excellent link. I'm not someone who believes in pure libertarian drug...

    • Chad

      Black Invention Myths

      I hate it when I get called a racist for busting these myths. I'm not a racist. Racism should be a...

    • Bigfoot

      Silicon Valley’s Anti-White Racial Dysgenics Program

      Academia had gotten in on this propaganda. Some sociologists refer to white people preferring to...

    • European Renaissance

      Black History Month Resources

      Black history month - it's an excellent idea! Excellent because if there is black history month -...

    • Josephus Cato

      Race War in the Outback

      The anal warts and vaginal sores thing was rather disturbing.  I'm guessing an aborigine minstrel...

    • S. Clark

      Guillermo del Toro’s Pinocchio

      Interestingly, in St. Louis Mo., where I live, they made "City Gardens" a kind of beautification...

    • Anthony Bavaria

      Spencer J. Quinn’s The No College Club: A Review

      Agreed. I'll go one step further to suggest that political discourse/metapolitical stuff and the...

    • Dick Squarejaw

      Race War in the Outback

      I read halfway through this article before I thought “this sounds like Jim Goad”. Loved it as usual...

    • Ewigkeit

      Everything Whites Do Is Bad . . . According to the Mainstream Media

      The R-word and its attendant sanctimony will never work for us and it is futile to try to subvert it...

    • Antipodean

      Race War in the Outback

      Very droll.In fairness to my country-men though, many of the hybrid folk are quite charming, even to...

    • Vehmgericht

      Race War in the Outback

      I have a hunch that the cradle of modern Homo sapiens is not East Africa, as we are so frantically...

    • Greg Johnson

      40% Off Selected Titles

      If you have a question, write to [email protected]

    • Fred C. Dobbs

      Race War in the Outback

      We can’t expect Hollywood to portray them in a negative light. You’re correct. The few people I’ve...

    • J Webb

      Race War in the Outback

      Very worthwhile topic. We will see how cleverly Australia will handle this. Will they give in to...

    • Don

      Spencer J. Quinn’s The No College Club: A Review

      A  great step in the right direction. Good, idea driven  pro-White fiction, especially for young...

  • Book Authors

    • Alain de Benoist
    • Anthony M. Ludovici
    • Beau Albrecht
    • Buttercup Dew
    • Charles Krafft
    • Christopher Pankhurst
    • Collin Cleary
    • F. Roger Devlin
    • Fenek Solère
    • Francis Parker Yockey
    • Greg Johnson
    • Gregory Hood
    • H. L. Mencken
    • Irmin Vinson
    • J. A. Nicholl
    • James J. O’Meara
    • Jef Costello
    • Jim Goad
    • Jonathan Bowden
    • Juleigh Howard-Hobson
    • Julius Evola
    • Kerry Bolton
    • Leo Yankevich
    • Michael Polignano
    • Multiple authors
    • Savitri Devi
    • Spencer J. Quinn
    • Tito Perdue
    • Trevor Lynch
  • Webzine Authors

    Contemporary authors

    • Howe Abbott-Hiss
    • Beau Albrecht
    • Aquilonius
    • Anthony Bavaria
    • Michael Bell
    • Alain de Benoist
    • Kerry Bolton
    • Jonathan Bowden
    • Buttercup Dew
    • Collin Cleary
    • Giles Corey
    • Jef Costello
    • Morris V. de Camp
    • F. Roger Devlin
    • Bain Dewitt
    • Jack Donovan
    • Ricardo Duchesne
    • Émile Durand
    • Guillaume Durocher
    • Mark Dyal
    • Guillaume Faye
    • Stephen Paul Foster
    • Fullmoon Ancestry
    • Jim Goad
    • Tom Goodrich
    • Alex Graham
    • Mark Gullick
    • Andrew Hamilton
    • Robert Hampton
    • Huntley Haverstock
    • Derek Hawthorne
    • Gregory Hood
    • Juleigh Howard-Hobson
    • Richard Houck
    • Alexander Jacob
    • Nicholas R. Jeelvy
    • Greg Johnson
    • Ruuben Kaalep
    • Tobias Langdon
    • Julian Langness
    • Travis LeBlanc
    • Patrick Le Brun
    • Trevor Lynch
    • Kevin MacDonald
    • G. A. Malvicini
    • John Michael McCloughlin
    • Margot Metroland
    • Millennial Woes
    • John Morgan
    • James J. O'Meara
    • Michael O'Meara
    • Christopher Pankhurst
    • Michael Polignano
    • J. J. Przybylski
    • Spencer J. Quinn
    • Quintilian
    • Edouard Rix
    • C. B. Robertson
    • C. F. Robinson
    • Hervé Ryssen
    • Kathryn S.
    • Alan Smithee
    • Fenek Solère
    • Ann Sterzinger
    • Thomas Steuben
    • Robert Steuckers
    • Tomislav Sunić
    • Donald Thoresen
    • Marian Van Court
    • Dominique Venner
    • Irmin Vinson
    • Michael Walker
    • Aylmer Wedgwood
    • Scott Weisswald
    • Leo Yankevich

    Classic Authors

    • Maurice Bardèche
    • Julius Evola
    • Ernst Jünger
    • D. H. Lawrence
    • Charles Lindbergh
    • Jack London
    • H. P. Lovecraft
    • Anthony M. Ludovici
    • Sir Oswald Mosley
    • National Vanguard
    • Friedrich Nietzsche
    • Revilo Oliver
    • William Pierce
    • Ezra Pound
    • Saint-Loup
    • Savitri Devi
    • Carl Schmitt
    • Miguel Serrano
    • Oswald Spengler
    • P. R. Stephensen
    • Jean Thiriart
    • John Tyndall
    • Francis Parker Yockey
  • Departments

    • Book Reviews
    • Movie Reviews
    • TV Reviews
    • Music Reviews
    • Art Criticism
    • Graphic Novels & Comics
    • Video Game Reviews
    • Fiction
    • Poems
    • Interviews
    • Videos
    • English Translations
    • Other Languages
      • Arabic
      • Bulgarian
      • Croatian
      • Czech
      • Danish
      • Dutch
      • Estonian
      • Finnish
      • French
      • German
      • Greek
      • Hungarian
      • Italian
      • Lithuanian
      • Norwegian
      • Polish
      • Portuguese
      • Romanian
      • Russian
      • Slovak
      • Spanish
      • Swedish
      • Ukrainian
    • Commemorations
    • Why We Write
  • Archives
  • Top 100 Commenters
Sponsored Links
Above Time Coffee Antelope Hill Publishing Paul Waggener IHR-Store Asatru Folk Assembly Breakey Imperium Press American Renaissance The Patrick Ryan Show Jim Goad The Occidental Observer
Editor-in-Chief
Greg Johnson
Books for sale
  • El Manifiesto Nacionalista Blanco
  • An Artist of the Right
  • Ernst Jünger
  • Reuben
  • The Partisan
  • Trevor Lynch’s Classics of Right-Wing Cinema
  • The Enemy of Europe
  • Imperium
  • Reactionary Modernism
  • Manifesto del Nazionalismo Bianco
  • O Manifesto Nacionalista Branco
  • Vade Mecum
  • Whiteness: The Original Sin
  • Space Vixen Trek Episode 17: Tomorrow the Stars
  • The Year America Died
  • Passing the Buck
  • Mysticism After Modernism
  • Gold in the Furnace
  • Defiance
  • Forever & Ever
  • Wagner’s Ring & the Germanic Tradition
  • Resistance
  • Materials for All Future Historians
  • Love Song of the Australopiths
  • White Identity Politics
  • Here’s the Thing
  • Trevor Lynch: Part Four of the Trilogy
  • Graduate School with Heidegger
  • It’s Okay to Be White
  • The World in Flames
  • The White Nationalist Manifesto
  • From Plato to Postmodernism
  • The Gizmo
  • Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch’s CENSORED Guide to the Movies
  • Toward a New Nationalism
  • The Smut Book
  • The Alternative Right
  • My Nationalist Pony
  • Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right
  • The Philatelist
  • Confessions of an Anti-Feminist
  • East and West
  • Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come
  • White Like You
  • Numinous Machines
  • Venus and Her Thugs
  • Cynosura
  • North American New Right, vol. 2
  • You Asked For It
  • More Artists of the Right
  • Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics
  • The Homo & the Negro
  • Rising
  • The Importance of James Bond
  • In Defense of Prejudice
  • Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)
  • The Hypocrisies of Heaven
  • Waking Up from the American Dream
  • Green Nazis in Space!
  • Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country
  • Heidegger in Chicago
  • End of an Era: Mad Men & the Ordeal of Civility
  • Sexual Utopia in Power
  • What is a Rune? & Other Essays
  • Son of Trevor Lynch’s White Nationalist Guide to the Movies
  • The Lightning & the Sun
  • The Eldritch Evola
  • Western Civilization Bites Back
  • New Right vs. Old Right
  • Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations
  • The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity
  • I do not belong to the Baader-Meinhof Group
  • Pulp Fascism
  • The Lost Philosopher
  • Trevor Lynch’s A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies
  • And Time Rolls On
  • Artists of the Right: Resisting Decadence
  • North American New Right, Vol. 1
  • Some Thoughts on Hitler
  • Tikkun Olam and Other Poems
  • Summoning the Gods
  • Taking Our Own Side
  • Reuben
  • The Node
  • The New Austerities
  • Morning Crafts
  • The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories
Copyright © 2023 Counter-Currents Publishing, Ltd.

Paywall Access





Please enter your email address. You will receive mail with link to set new password.

Edit your comment