The Worst Week Yet:
September 26-October 2, 2021

3,006 words

Boxing’s Heavyweight Division is Ruled by Undefeated White Men

Last Saturday night, right after our editorial deadline had passed, the undefeated Ukrainian heavyweight boxer Oleksandr Usyk ^[2] won a unanimous decision against the much taller and heavier black British boxer Anthony Joshua, stripping Joshua of the WBO, WBA, and IBF championship belts. The wild-eyed ^[3] Usyk, considered one of the most technically gifted boxers of his generation, was previously the undisputed cruiserweight champion and tends to enjoy defeating others on their home turf. He battered Joshua for 12 rounds in front of a crowd of 65,000 in North London.

The only remaining heavyweight belt, the WBC, is held by the undefeated six-foot-nine-inch Tyson Fury ^[4], an Irish traveller known as the “Gypsy King.” Fury claimed his belt last year when he brutalized the previously undefeated Alabama-born Negro Deontay Wilder for seven rounds before Wilder’s corner threw in the towel. Fury, who fought Wilder to a controversial draw in 2018, will meet Wilder for a third time next Saturday night in Las Vegas. Should Fury prevail yet again, it should set up a mega-fight between him and Usyk as the first undisputed heavyweight champion since black British boxer Lennox Lewis claimed that title in April 2000.

Whoever emerges triumphant from a proposed clash between Usyk and Fury would be boxing’s first undisputed white heavyweight champion since Ingemar Johansson held the title for less than a year ending in June 1960.

I’ll take the good news where I can get it! And now for the bad news . . .

When Black Women Pose As Klansmen

Despite what many of you may think, I do not currently have access to the complete membership rolls of the Ku Klux Klan since its inception in the 1860s, but I can state with confidence that none of them was ever named “Terresha.”

But in Douglassville, Georgia, about 23 miles west of Atlanta, police are charging a 30-year-old Negress named Terresha Lucas ^[5] with eight counts of making terroristic threats after she allegedly left threatening notes in neighbors’ mailboxes in a Hate Spree that started last December and ended in early September.

Police said ^[6] that in the notes, someone describing himself as a six-foot-tall white Klansman with a long red beard — apparently, blacks are terrified of long red beards — promised the local descendants of slaves all kinds of mischief:

Residents on Manning Drive began receiving the notes last December from a person who claimed to be a white male member of the Ku Klux Klan, who threatened to burn down their homes and kill them, according to detectives with the Douglasville Police Department. Instead, their investigation led them to Terresha Lucas, a 30-year-old African-American female, who was charged with eight counts of making terroristic threats this month. Accused of writing and placing the notes in her neighbors’ boxes, Lucas allegedly described herself as a six-feet-tall white male with a long, red beard who did not live in the neighborhood.

(Apologies to all of our black readers who were forced yet again to read about the long red beard in that passage.)

The notes also allegedly included “the N-word,” which I’ll assume was neither “nifty” nor “neato.” They also contained threats about lynching blacks and killing their children, but we all can agree that using “the N-word” is the real crime here.

The handwriting on the notes led police to Miz Terresha, who shamelessly violated the First Rule of Written Hate Threats: type them!

In 2017, at Parkway Central High School west of St. Louis, Missouri, a student identified only as “non-white ^[7]” confessed to scrawling racial slurs and the phrase “White Lives Matter” on a mirror in a girls’ bathroom. Last Tuesday, after several uppity walkouts were staged across the entire county school district after “racist graffiti ^[8]” was again found at the same school, it was yet again revealed that the perpetrator was “not white ^[9].”

Instead of pivoting and saying, “Hey, all these hate hoaxes are undermining the cause,” black students and a very wimpy-looking white male school superintendent ^[10] dug their cloven hooves even deeper in the social-justice manure.

Sophomore Shayneisha Allen ^[11] — no racial identification needed, because there are no non-black Shayneishas — said, “I wasn’t really focused on the skin tone of the person, I was focused on the fact that some child has that much hate.”

Hate for whom, though, Shayneisha? For blacks or for whites? Why won’t you specify, Shayneisha?

Avery Adams ^[12], a black senior at the school who organized the previous walkout and for whom I was unfortunately unable to procure a picture to confirm my suspicion that she’s overweight, said that the hate hoax was proof that innocent black students must deal with endless racial harassment from whites:

I think the ability for students to so wholeheartedly believe that what had happened wasn’t surprising, regardless of it being a Black [sic] student, is something that shows Parkway’s character based on what’s been happening. . . . I think the district thinks because it was a Black [sic] student this event is over or this event doesn’t matter, but I don’t think that’s true.

Superintendent Keith Marty issued a statement framing the debacle as a teachable moment for his uneducable flock:

The student responsible is not white. This does not diminish the hurt it caused or the negative impact it has had on our entire community. Students proactively led walkouts at multiple Parkway high schools and in these moments, many students shared personal experiences of racism throughout their lives and at school. Let us use this opportunity to continue to grow as a community to be more compassionate, peaceful, and loving individuals with care for all.

Being compassionate, peaceful, and loving individuals is what got us to this point in the first place.

Yet More New Old News About the Klan

If you’re the type of weirdo like me who likes to search the terms “Klan” and “KKK” on Google News — hey, at least I’m not a black female posing as a Klansman with a long red beard! — you’ll realize, just as I have, that the Klan hasn’t been making news in a coon’s age.

Last week ^[13] I covered “new old news” stories about the KKK in Indiana and Colorado from a century ago. This week I bring you new old stories about the Klan during the 1920s in South Dakota ^[14] — where they killed a Catholic priest in 1921 and marched 500-strong in Sioux Falls six years later — and in Arkansas ^[15], where they made such a big to-do in the 1920s that this guy ^[16] thought it’d make a cool book in 2021. Apparently back then, the Klan engaged in charitable activities, barbecues, and parades when they weren’t spreading hatred and lynching colored fellas.

“I May Have Killed and Cannibalized Him, But Please Don’t Call Me a Fag!”

It is rumored that serial killer Jeffrey “The Milwaukee Cannibal” Dahmer once objected to being called a racist by pointing out that a few of the 17 gay males he murdered were not black.

In the same spirit of “methinks the lady doth protest too much about the wrong things,” an alleged “cannibal teacher ^[19]” on trial in Berlin for “killing, dismembering, and eating” a man he met on a dating site hid his victim’s penis and did not call emergency services because he feared “it would have come out that I am homosexual . . . since my DNA could still have possibly been present due to the oral sex I performed.”

How bad was this oral sex that he felt compelled to kill the guy?

The accused, a math teacher identified only as 42-year-old “Stefan R,” is on trial for the murder of Stefan Trogisch on September 6, 2020. He had allegedly purchased long knives, a bone saw, a meat freezer, and a “chemical suitable for dissolving human tissue” before the fatal encounter between the Two Stefans. When his sister asked about the meat freezer, he reportedly told her it was for storing pizzas. He had also placed a sign that read “Instructions for emasculating and slaughtering a person” on his window ledge and searched the terms “long pig” and “fatten and slaughter people” on the dark web before the Other Stefan showed up for their date.

Just don’t call him a fag!

In Africa, home of some of the most hilarious homosexual panics on the planet, anti-gay “decency leagues” in Mali ^[20] are spreading rumors that doctors “are injecting people with homosexuality.” A “conspiratorial and obscurantist cabal has leaked lists of names supposedly engaged in this practice” and is “promising to fight against medical staff who supposedly were injecting children with medication that converted them into homosexuals.”

Pray tell, what is the name of this medication? Gaalox? Vifagra?

Does 1/25th of America’s Population Commit 2/3rds of its Murders?

The FBI released its Uniform Crime Reports for 2020 ^[21] last week. The reports represent about 85% of police departments nationwide. Total murders and non-negligent manslaughters increased nearly 5,000 in raw numbers compared to 2019, representing an increase of 29.4%.

Blacks comprised 56.52% of known offenders. Since murder cases in black areas are solved at a lower frequency than anywhere else in the country, this quotient is likely higher when one factors in the number of unknown offenders. Steve Sailer ^[22] crunched the numbers, and depending on how one defines “black” compared to all non-blacks, blacks out-murder all other groups combined on a per-capita basis by a factor of anywhere from 8.4 to 1 up to 9.8 to 1. Startlingly, blacks out-murder non-blacks at a higher clip than men out-murder women, a factor which currently stands at 7.5 to 1.

Taking into account the number of unsolved murders, considering that blacks comprise roughly 13% of the population, and factoring in the variables “young” and “male” into the equation, it’s likely that 1/25th of the population commits 2/3rds of America’s murders and non-negligent manslaughters.

Time to change the meme “13/50” into “4/67.”

Genetically Defective Descendants of Albino Mutants and the People Who Hate Them

Since October is the month that ends in Halloween and spooks abound, it is only proper that it is when England celebrates Black History Month.

In a fact-digging article that reveals just about everything except the name and location of the frickin’ website, England’s Telegraph ^[23] mentions that a “Black History Month website controlled by a white man featured taxpayer-funded adverts alongside claims that white people are the ‘genetically defective descendants of albino mutants.’”

The bit about the albino mutants comes from Dr. Frances Cress Welsing, a now-dead Negress who once said that on Valentine’s Day, white men give their sweethearts chocolate candy with nuts so that they can fantasize about making love to a genetically superior black male, or some such folderol. That sentiment was also featured on England’s mystery Black History Month website until very recently.

The white man who “controls” the website is advertising executive Ian Thomas, who removed some of what he called the “dreadful” anti-white content but allowed the sentence “Europeans have been encouraged to be morally monstrous to non-Europeans for so long, this behaviour has become second nature” because he claims it originated from a “respected body.”

Linda Bellos ^[24], who may be the homeliest black woman who ever lived and was allegedly “instrumental in launching the Black History Month celebration in the UK in the late Eighties,” seemed most angered by the fact that a white man owns the site:

The whole purpose of Black History Month is to empower us [black people] . . . I don’t want some white man, or even white woman, playing that role. The taking of ideas, and indeed the taking of people, was done very successfully by the British, it is called enslavement. I am not talking about his motives, but I am talking about the outcome.

If you’re bitching about the fact that a white man owns an anti-white website, you may be over-empowered.

British Medical Journal Calls Women “Bodies With Vaginas”

According to trans orthodoxy, men can get pregnant and you don’t need a vagina to be a woman. It seems as if all of the major scientific institutions have fallen for this nonsense, despite how unscientific it is.

It’s difficult to peel away the layers of delusion and appeasement to figure out exactly what was going on, but famed British medical journal The Lancet recently ruffled some gender-indeterminate feathers in an issue with an article called “Periods on Display ^[26],” which was apparently an earnest review regarding “an exhibit about the history of menstruation at the Vagina Museum in London.” The author referred to women as “women” four times in the article but also pecked out this passage, which made its way onto The Lancet’s cover: “Historically, the anatomy and physiology of bodies with vaginas have been neglected.”

It’s hard if not impossible to discern whether the phrase “bodies with vaginas” was a delicate attempt to distinguish those from “men with penises who call themselves women,” and in the grand scheme of things it matters not a whit, but The Lancet found itself in hot water for unconsciously recalling one of my favorite jokes:

Q: What do you call the useless piece of skin around the vagina?
A: The woman.

There was the predictably swift, harsh, brutal, hysterical, and merciless backlash, followed immediately by the predictably groveling apology ^[27] from The Lancet’s editor: “We encourage people to read the full review and support a growing movement against menstrual shame and period poverty.”

One day, hopefully when I’m still alive, one of these editors will offer the only sane response: “You bitches need to shut up, get your ass in the kitchen, and make me a sandwich.”

Ejaculating in a Woman’s Coffee: Sex Crime or Property Damage?

Apparently there’s a trend in Asia, especially South Korea, where men jizz all over women’s belongings and in their food. It’s referred to as “semen terrorism ^[28],” but in South Korea, judges are treating it as a property crime rather than a sexual assault. In May of this year, a man who was found guilty of “ejaculating inside his female colleague’s coffee tumbler six times over the course of half a year” was fined $2,610 on “property damage” charges because the judge ruled that he had “ruined” the tumbler.

In 2019 in West Java, a man who became known as the “sperm-throwing terror ^[29]” was arrested on sexual-harassment charges for tossing his spunk at multiple women.

In Indonesia ^[30], a doctor who was graciously allowed by a married couple to be their roommate was arrested last month after surveillance footage allegedly revealed him peeping on the woman as she showered, masturbating, and then smearing his cum all over the couple’s food on several occasions.

Hey, you can always buy more food, but it’s difficult to find a roommate who’s a doctor.

Hey, You — Would You Hide a Jew?

Some would say that far too many people hate Jews. Others would say not nearly enough. But to allege that Jew-hatred is rampant in the public sphere is as silly as claiming that American discourse fairly throbs with anti-black rhetoric. It’s simply not true, and you look like a liar for insisting that it is.

It makes me almost sad – almost — to see that so many people who need to be hated aren’t getting the hate that appears to be their lifeblood.

Radio host and author Dennis Prager is a Jew. You ask him; he’ll tell you. Within five minutes. Apparently, like many Jews, he spends a lot of his private moments fearing that America is on the brink of “a Nazi-like outbreak.”

In his recent article “Who Would Hide a Jew If Nazis Took Over America? ^[31],” he writes:

There is something about most Jews that few non-Jews know: We Jews often ask ourselves if a non-Jew in our lives would hide us in the event of a Nazi-like outbreak ^[32]. . . . I don’t know if young Jews think about this, but nearly all Jews who grew up in the decades following the Holocaust ^[33] often wondered: Would this non-Jew hide me? . . . I have thought about this all my life because the question “Who hid Jews?” is one of the most important questions anyone — Jew or non-Jew — needs to think about.

Perhaps I’m not a natural-born Jew-hider, but to me, “Where is my next meal coming from?” is a question that tends to take precedence over “Who hid Jews?”

Dara Horn ^[34] seems like the type of Jewish woman who would call up strangers in the middle of the night just to tell them she’s Jewish. She claims to “read works of Jewish philosophy for fun.” Apart from writing two novels that won the National Jewish Award for fiction, she is now the author of a non-fiction book called People Love Dead Jews ^[35].

“This book explores the many strange and sickening ways in which the world’s affection for dead Jews shapes the present moment,” she says. “I hope you will find it as disturbing as I do.”

Bubeleh, I’m pretty sure I find the entire premise even more disturbing than you do.

She says that the world’s filthy and hateful non-Jews see Jewishness as “a state of non-being: not being Christian or Muslim or whatever else other people apparently were . . . being alienated, being marginalized, or best of all, being dead. . . . As thousands of Holocaust books and movies and TV shows and lectures and courses and mandatory school curricula made abundantly clear, dead Jews were the most popular of all.”

Who’s your fact-checker, lady? Did they verify that it’s non-Jews who keep making a big deal out of the Holocaust?

Horn tends to see Holocaust museums and exhibitions as essentially celebratory:

[Such places are] imbued with a kind of optimism, a bedrock assumption that they were, for lack of a better word, effective. . . . The idea was that people would come to these museums and learn what the world had done to the Jews. . . . They would then stop hating Jews. . . . Perhaps we are giving people ideas. . . . Never again . . . has come to mean that anything short of the Holocaust is, well, not the Holocaust.

What’s the term for something infinitely more complex than a persecution complex? A persecution constellation? And what’s crueler: to give people whose entire identity hinges on suffering the suffering they so desperately crave, or to deny it to them?

*  *  *

Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.

• First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
• Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.

To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here: