The Worst Week Yet: August 8-14, 2021Jim Goad
Making Quality Education Accessible to the Dumb and Oppressed
At an unspecified moment about six months ago when everyone was asleep, this topsy-turvy world’s string-pullers and shot-callers quietly replaced the word “equality” with the much more insidious term “equity.” In the twinkling of an eye, they ditched the idea of a level playing field and instead insisted that all games must end in a tie.
Black people are known for a lot of things — crime, poverty, cannibalism, tapdancing, voodoo, shiny teeth, and giving their children kooky names — but it would be unfair, both to black people and to the truth, to say that they are renowned for their mathematical prowess.
The increasingly unscientific Scientific American wants to change all that. “Modern Mathematics Confronts Its White, Patriarchal Past” bellows a recent headline of an article that unquestioningly relates several stories from black mathematicians — apparently, such creatures exist — about being treated rudely by white mathematicians. It quotes one woman who says that “students of color” keep leaving math Ph.D. programs due to “harassment, abuse, and neglect” rather than, oh, the statistical fact that only about 4 in 10 black students ever bother to complete their college education.
“Mathematicians want to think their field is a meritocracy, but bias, harassment and exclusion persist,” the article screeches. “Fewer than 1 percent of U.S. doctorates in math are awarded to African-Americans, and fewer than 30 percent are awarded to women.”
The article also quotes a black math teacher who suggests that math departments should shy away from weighing math aptitude in potential candidates and instead focus on whether an applicant “wants to help build community” and “will be good at teaching or perhaps good at encouraging women and minorities as undergraduates to continue in this profession.”
Although the essay says that “statistics on the mathematical profession are difficult to ignore,” it seems to carefully evade statistics on the disparities between how blacks and whites, as well as men and women, perform on mathematics tests.
Whites score 86 points higher than blacks on the math portion of the SAT.
Males score 18 points higher than females. When it comes to students who would be viable Ph.D. candidates, whites are 11 times more likely than blacks to score 750 or above on the math SAT. In fact, only 2 out of every 1,000 blacks achieve that score or higher.
In mid-July, Governor Kate Brown of the increasingly insane State of Oregon quietly — meaning she didn’t hold a press conference about it, and it didn’t become public knowledge until about a week ago — signed Senate Bill 744 into law. Until she signed the law, Oregon high-school students had to demonstrate “freshman to sophomore-level” proficiency in math, writing, and reading in order to graduate as, you know, seniors. One would think you’d have to graduate with senior-level proficiency to graduate, but that was not the case — not until today, at least. Now, you don’t even have to demonstrate freshman-level proficiency to graduate from high school in Oregon. This new policy will be in effect for at least the next five years.
Charles Boyle, Governor Brown’s Deputy Communications Director, said that suspending even these basic standards will help “Oregon’s Black, Latino, Latina, Latinx, Indigenous, Asian, Pacific Islander, Tribal, and students of color.”
I don’t think the Asians need any help, seeing as how they routinely score about 80 points higher than whites on the math SAT, but how is this not an admission by the Governor’s office that all the other groups are dumber than whites?
Equity. It’s enough to make a guy puke.
The Million-Dollar Slur
As someone who, over a quarter-century ago, was falsely accused by a black guy who tried breaking into my car of calling him a word that rhymes with “ditchdigger,” I’m intimately aware of how blacks have been playing the whole “he called me a word that rhymes with ‘ditchdigger’” game for a long, long time now.
I mean, they’re not that dumb, at least not when it comes to things besides math and particle physics. They realize how much weight that word carries and how they can benefit by claiming they were called a word that rhymes with “boat rigger.”
Dayshawn Rodriguez is a black former employee of Starbucks who is suing the company because he claims they failed to “protect” him from a white woman who he claims repeatedly called him a word that rhymes with the name of the beloved Disney cartoon character Tigger. Although Starbucks representatives say they responded to Rodriguez’s allegations by formally banning the customer from all local stores, Dayshawn — who may or may not have a twin brother named Nightshawn — claims it wasn’t enough. He is suing for statutory damages, lost wages, and “damages for emotional distress and embarrassment.
Shouldn’t he be suing the white woman who he says called him that super-naughty word? And how about suing his mom for naming him “Dayshawn”?
Melvin Berry is a former materials handler for the Tesla Corporation who quit his job not because, as anyone who’s ever spent significant time with black people in an employment situation knows, blacks tend to be lazy and shiftless and will find any excuse to call in sick, but because he simply couldn’t handle being called a word that rhymes with “chigger” during his tenure there. He was recently awarded over $1 million — over three-quarters of which will go to lawyers — for claiming that white workers as well as white bosses couldn’t stop calling him a word that almost rhymes with “go figure.”
Roughly a hundred other black Tesla employees are now involved in a class-action lawsuit claiming that at a factory in California, they were repeatedly subjected to the “N-word” (a term which is itself becoming so offensive that henceforth I will refer to it as “a term which sounds like ‘inward’”) as well as ceaseless examples of “KKK signs and swastikas spray-painted on bathroom stalls.”
Is this place hiring?
Seeing and Hearing Imaginary “Niggers”
Last Sunday at a baseball game in Colorado between the home team Rockies and the visiting Miami Marlins, as a black Florida player named Lewis Brinson was at the plate, a fan twice shouted out something that sounded to many people like The Worst Word in the English Language. You can hear it for yourself here.
The outrage was predictably swift and Rockies management immediately launched an investigation, which concluded that the fan was merely shouting out to the team’s mascot, “Dinger.”
To avoid any such unfortunate occurrences in the future, I demand that the Rockies change the name of their mascot to “Dayshawn.”
Back 4 Blood is a video game still in its beta stage. It is described as the “spiritual successor” of a game called Left 4 Dead, which apparently involves shooting and killing zombies before they eat you. But none of all this mayhem and gore is the offensive part. During a beta screening, many players thought they heard a zombie screaming a word that rhymes with “Dinger” when it was shot. You can hear it here.
Turtle Rock Studios, producers of Back 4 Blood, have sworn that this is a coincidence and that when the game is released for sale, no zombies will hurl racial slurs while being shot.
The University of Wisconsin at Madison recently spent an estimated $50,000 to remove a 70-ton boulder from its campus because it had been deemed — mostly by black students — to be a “painful symbol of racism.” Formally known as Chamberlin Rock, the boulder had sat peacefully on campus since 1925.
University spokesman Gary Brown released a statement about the boulder’s removal:
Moving the rock to this remote site prevents further harm to our community while preserving the rock’s educational and research value for current and future scholars. Students and the general public will no longer casually encounter the rock, but it will remain available to those specifically seeking it out for teaching and learning purposes.
Why was the rock removed? Because in 1925 — and university historians say this is the only known occurrence of the term being used — an article in the Wisconsin State Journal referred to it as “Niggerhead Rock.”
One man’s painful symbol of racism is another man’s hilarious symbol of racism. Different strokes, and all that.
QAnutty: Man Cited QAnon Theory About “Serpent DNA” to Explain Why He Murdered His Children
The QAnon cult was such a deeply embarrassing example of the bottomless gullibility of some Americans that it’s hard not to think that the hoax was perpetrated by someone who hated Donald Trump. Nothing that it predicted came to pass, and I’ve yet to see the actual videotape of Hillary Clinton murdering a child and drinking its blood, so I remain steadfastly dubious about the veracity of the whole shebang.
Matthew Taylor Coleman is a 40-year-old owner of a surfing shop in California. Until last week, he was the father of a 2-year-old son and a 10-month-old daughter. But according to an FBI affidavit, he took his children to Mexico, killed them with a spear gun, and dumped their bodies in a ditch because the self-described QAnon acolyte told investigators he’d been “receiving visions and signs revealing that his wife possessed serpent DNA and had passed it onto his children,” and that by spearing them to death, he was “saving the world from monsters.”
I’ve been saying it for years: Never trust a surfer.
Comic-Book Hero Robin “The Boy Wonder” Comes Out as Bisexual; Batman Remains in the Closet
In his 1954 book Seduction of the Innocent, psychiatrist Fredric Wertham claimed that the comic-book duo of Batman and Robin was “like a wish-dream of two homosexuals living together.”
What was it that tipped him off? The tight shorts? The complete disinterest in women? The fact that they lived together at Bruce Wayne’s mansion along with a male butler? They fact that they slept in the same bed and woke up needing a cold shower? Their naked trips to the tanning salon? The fact that the original Robin’s first name was “Dick”?
After 80 years of dropping hints the size of the bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima, the August issue of Batman: Urban Legends has the newest iteration of Robin — whose name is not Dick Grayson but rather Tim Drake — agreeing to go out on a date with another man.
Writer Elizabeth Fitzmartin says she wanted “to pay tribute to the fact that sexuality is a journey. . . . Look, I don’t know if this is something that can happen, but this is the story, because it’s the only story it can be.”
Not true, Liz. You didn’t have to turn the Boy Wonder into a fag. He could have been treated with Thorazine, electroshock therapy, and a yearlong regimen of 24-hour conversion therapy in a cramped and locked room.
Another Week, Another Mass Shooting by an Incel
While many on the “Dissident Right” insist that the incel crisis is women’s fault, I doubt they’d say that ugly women who can’t find mates is men’s fault. They’d tend to blame women in both cases, which, I submit to the jury, may be partially to blame for the fact that many of them can’t seem to find women willing to date them. Like all other humans, women don’t like to be blamed for everything.
Since 2009, incels have gone on killing sprees that, depending on whose estimates you trust and who qualifies as an “incel,” have killed at least 65 people. The body counts here are in parentheses and only count murder victims, not incel suicides or collateral injuries:
- George Sodini (3) in Pennsylvania in 2009.
- Elliot Rodger (6) in California in 2014.
- Chris Harper-Mercer (9) in Oregon in 2015.
- Sheldon Bentley (1) in Alberta in 2016.
- William Atchison (2) in New Mexico in 2017.
- Nikolas Cruz (17) in Florida in 2018.
- Alek Minassian (10) in Toronto in 2018.
- Scott Beierle (2) in Florida in 2018.
- Unnamed 17-year-old male (1) in Toronto in 2020.
- Tobias Rathjen (10) in Germany in 2020.
You can add to that total the five Brits who were gunned down last week by 22-year-old Jake Davison, a self-described “fucking fat ugly virgin” who used a pump-action shotgun to murder his mother and four others over a six-minute spree before turning the gun on himself. Davison had posted to various online incel message boards and also subscribed to IncelTV on YouTube. He said he hadn’t even spoken to a girl since he was 17.
The following is a mishmash of comments both from Davison’s online posts and from YouTube videos he made under the nom de video “Professor Waffle”:
You wake up and you stare at the wall and you’re thinking, um, nothing’s changed but I’m still in the same position, same period in life, still a fucking this, that virgin fucking fat ugly.
I used to be OK with being a virgin too, but when you get older and the inferiority complex kicks in and the feeling of despair and missing out occurs . . .
Try being an unemployed, autistic, poor, sexually frustrated male with tons of health issues, no social circle and being stuck in government housing with my mother for years on end, having missed out on so much in life.
It’s not just sex and teen romance I feel I missed out on, I feel I missed out on the entire teenage experience. Since leaving school I don’t have any friends.
Feel my mother has played a role in [me] being a male virgin.
Why, it’s almost as if he never considered going on a diet, copping a shave, getting a haircut, and going to charm school.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
IQ Doesn’t Matter
The Future’s So Dumb, I Gotta Wear Shades
The Worst Week Yet: March 12-18, 2023
Race and Ethics in John Ford’s Stagecoach
Institutional Racism Explained
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 526 Cyan Quinn Reports from CPAC & More
The Worst Week Yet: March 5-11, 2023
40,000 Brown Sardines Packed Into One Prison
Charm School is a real thing. It’s not a bad idea. See minor British Comedy Classic, School for Scoundrels. Terry Thomas and Alistair Sims are quite good fun.
Best Week though is the Taliban taking back Afghanistan. Biden did a good thing. He’s pissed off all the right people.
Apart from East Asians are there any other ethnicities ‘over-represented’ in the field of Mathematics? If so, surely that is a terrible problem and we should be given the facts!
Often missing from the incel shitlist is Cho Seung-Hui, the avatar of Asian rage who shot up Virginia Tech in 2007 and killed 32 people. He committed his act before the whole “incel” thing became en vogue, but no doubt he was motivated in part by his resentment over being a typical undesirable Asian male living in a white man’s world.
I think “The N Word” would be an awesome band name, along with “Jewish Space Lazers” and “Rainbow Dildo Butt Monkey.”
It used to be called Undersexed. That’s a better term. This guy was on amphetamines and Bodybuilding roids. Onset of schizophrenia coupled with speed and steroids?
I can make a strong argument that Spider-Man was on the other team too. His real name is Peter Parker and his Spidey senses are always tingling.
No, if he was a butt bongo player, his name would have been Peter Parkhim. Though maybe ‘Peter Parker,’ with its inclusion of a slang term for penis, and mention of ‘her,’ sort of, could be a ref to him playing for both teams.
If that is him in the picturethen Jake Davison was not a bad looking guy. Same applies to several of these incel shooters like Elliott Rogers. Many worse looking men get girls. Almost like if they had a male friend (or friends) they could get connected in a social circle and meet girls naturally.
It’s about instant fame.
I am especially amused, as an Angeleno gringa, to hear of the new ‘woke’ appellation: ‘Latinx’. I can just imagine of group of Latina momacitas sitting around and one saying, “My daughter now is calling herself ‘La Tinx’ — what the hell is a La Tinx”!
And for those of us over ‘a certain age’ — fill in the blanks — who cannot keep up with the steady flow of new words into our rickety old language, what is an “Incel”?
An “incel” is basically the pathologized version of the unsocialized male who stands low on the hierarchical scale, purely in the context of his inability to get laid. So basically it’s “nerd” or “geek” without any positive focus on latent talents or high-IQ savantism usually associated with those two, and instead purely associated with impotence and resentment at being socially or romantically unsuccessful. I suppose this shift from positive to negative loner-ism is because back in the day they were most likely to be socially stunted because they were inside doing their homework all day, i.e. getting something in return for not socializing, whereas today they’re more likely to be socially stunted because they spent their teens indoors playing video games and in the end have nothing to show for their years of isolation.
Or you coulda just explained it means “involuntary celibate.”
“Involuntary celibate” is just a longer version of “incel” which really isn’t as self-explanatory as you might think. It’s a dumb term anyway. It’s my opinion that incels aren’t even real, they’re invented. Sure there’s guys out there who don’t get much action, but that doesn’t mean they can’t. They’re just so stuck in a loser mindset that they think they can’t. Inceldom exists purely in the mind. Identifying as an incel is a resignation and basically branding yourself an eternal loser, and a sure route to pointless self-destruction.
I have to thank Mr Goad, with his gift for language, for softening my unfriendly attitude toward the SubSaharans. He has helped me see them as fodder for comedy rather than as fodder for what I usually think of them as fodder for.
Dayshawn — who may or may not have a twin brother named Nightshawn —
Anyone else notice a lack of equity in serial killer reporting?
The venerable A&E is doing a three-night serial killer-fest this week featuring the stars of serial killers’ Golden Age, Ted Bundy, Gacy, Dahmer, The Green River Killer, and another one as “the most prolific serial killers” and who were active around the same time.
I watched literally two minutes of the first one and quickly switched over to Cupcake Wars when a black woman whose son was eaten by Dahmer ventured that the reason he wasn’t caught sooner is because “dey always believes de white man.”
Your son gets eaten by a homo and your main concern is gratuitous race-baiting? How many missionaries have her ancestors chowed down on?
The Green River Killer wins Biggest Body Count of the bunch with 70-some.
Trouble is, it’s been known to anyone who wants to know for about twenty years or so that serial killer of color Carl Eugene Watts beats everyone with over 80 victims.
Until it’s come to light that Sam Little, also African-American, has killed over 90.
Many of his victims were white women and most of Watts’ were white women. Both were active decades longer than their white counterparts with better press agents.
Let’s say a white serial killer killed 80 or 90 black women. Would they make the cut for a six-hour documentary on serial killers? Any made-for-TV movies on them? Would they be household words? Could television and “the media” be comprised of lying liars? Are we doomed?
Those were rhetorical questions.
@Shift – Those are EXCELLENT points; and, thank you for raising them. I was recently watching a rather well done series, “The Fall” (series one, from 2013) and quickly became off-put with the casual tossing around of the word “misogyny” as the explanation for everything the female lead detective encountered. And, of course, the featured sadistic killer was a very White male, who attacked “high-achieving” women because deep down he felt inferior to them, and was acting out in rage at his own inadequacy. Countless novels I have picked up also (and discarded!) echo this canard: the “typical profile” as being a White male in his 30’s. It’s another one of the Big Lies.
So much entertainment has become too distasteful and poisonous for me to consume.
How in the name of all that’s holy did “nigger” become forbidden? Has any other word ever been declared illegal before? Walk down the street in nyc any day of the week and all you’ll hear is n-words calling each other “niggers”. Only non-n-words are forbidden? Some kid lost her scholarship for quoting a song that had “nigger” in it. My negro fatigue has reached its limit.
No, they don’t say “nigger,” they say “nigga.” There is a world of difference. Even a white man can say “nigga.” As with all slang and regional accents in the US, it’s how you use, or not use, the hard “r.” That is one powerful letter.
@Bigga Smalls – Re: Even a white man can say “nigga.” No. They really can’t; not anymore. Don’t try this one at home, boys and girls!
“…I submit to the jury, may be partially to blame for the fact that many of them can’t seem to find women willing to date them. Like all other humans, women don’t like to be blamed for everything.”
I toasted Mr. Goad at dinner this evening.
“Like all other humans, women don’t like to be blamed for everything.”
Women like not to be blamed for anything at all!
“QAnon, … it’s hard not to think that the hoax was perpetrated by someone who hated Donald Trump”.
I think it was perpetrated by that creepy little Jewish boy (or do I repeat myself) of Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, to keep White republican voters from moving towards the dissident right.
<I>While many on the “Dissident Right” insist that the incel crisis is women’s fault, I doubt they’d say that ugly women who can’t find mates is men’s fault. </I>
Of course not, because women are the sexual gatekeepers. Women decide when and with whom they give it away to and when they get pregnant. The reproductive ball is in their court. Where is this world where women seek out men, who then decide if the girl is worthy of his seed?
While it is the case that some women get fewer seekers than others, it is rarely the case that a woman gets no seekers. When a woman can’t find a mate it’s because she overrates herself, thanks to constant female self-affirmation propaganda that tells women they are God’s gift to humanity and deserve it all.
It is well established that women are less willing to settle for an average guy (looks-wise) than men are willing to settle for average-looking women. Men are less selective and therefore more willing to settle for an unattractive girl than women are willing to date an unattractive man. Here’s just one example of it:
So yes, men do blame “femcels” because if they can’t find a mate it’s because their standards are too high.
As tired as one becomes of the “misogyny” canard, one becomes equally tired of the male perception that some women in this modern age couldn’t possibly be as inept, lacking in self-esteem and socially isolated as some males. Also, there is a world of difference in finding someone who will “plant his seed” in one, as opposed to someone who will stick around to support the mother and child. Women have a biological imperative to find a long-term, suitable partner who will support her and her offspring; an evolutionary trait the aids in the perpetuation of the human species. It is true, also, that female hypergamy has a biological basis.
With your extensive knowledge of women, surely you know that.
one becomes equally tired of the male perception that some women in this modern age couldn’t possibly be as inept, lacking in self-esteem and socially isolated as some males.
None of these things compromise a woman’s ability to reproduce .Why, for example, does it matter to a man if a woman lacks self-esteem? Do you hear anybody but feminists criticizing women who lack confidence? Men don’t want women who are sure of themselves, they want young, attractive virgins. An attractive young woman who lacks self-esteem and social skills won’t have any problems getting attention from men.
Being competent, self-assured, and extroverted has zero bearing on a woman’s ability to make and raise babies. These are masculine, not feminine, traits.
Women have a biological imperative to find a long-term, suitable partner who will support her and her offspring; an evolutionary trait the aids in the perpetuation of the human species.
That has been short-circuited by the state. When women can get abortions they don’t need to find a good provider. Having kids out of wedlock is no longer an issue because the state provides free housing and supplemental incomes to unwed mothers.
Women have effectively socialized the costs of hypergamy. That is why it is a mistake for Jim Goad to call patriarchy “Affirmative Action for men who can’t get laid.” When has the sexual marketplace not been regulated in someone’s favor?
“unemployed, autistic, poor, sexually frustrated male with tons of health issues …” would like to meet …
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Edit your comment