Print this post Print this post

Hillbilly Elegy: Movie vs. Book

J. D. Vance.

2,212 words

There are many odd and irksome things about the new Hillbilly Elegy movie on Netflix. For my money, the strangest aspect of the production is that it has only a superficial resemblance to J. D. Vance’s 2016 book. It’s as though you were to make a movie of Moby-Dick, knowing only that it has a ship and a white spermaceti whale and a mad captain who stumps around on a peg-leg.

Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir of Family and Culture in Crisis was political propaganda dressed up as autobiography. Considered creative nonfiction, it’s limp and tangled. Its value lay mainly in its critical reception — or rather, the hype surrounding it — in the summer of 2016.

The film is basically soap opera about family dysfunction among the semi-rural working classes. Some of the many characters in the memoir sort of appear in the film, only they’ve pretty much been conjured up ex nihilo (as Bill Buckley would say). This is because the book didn’t give screenwriter Vanessa Taylor or director Ron Howard much to work with. Vance the memoirist is mostly interested in himself, and that’s perfectly appropriate. But the other people in his vast parade of interchangeable stepfathers, friends, cousins, teachers are mostly ciphers.

Vance the writer is sort of an anti-Dickens: he brings us a hundred characters, but gives them nothing quirky or memorable to say or do. So the film has to invent and improvise, building a storyline that revolves around Vance’s mother, seen here as a promiscuous and drug-addled loony. The real Mom was blessedly absent for much of Vance’s childhood, and in his book, she’s mostly an offstage irritant. The film tries to give her some backstory (high school salutatorian; early pregnancy), but that’s not the same as character development of a sort that would make her interesting or likable. In the film, her main activities are drugs, sex, and throwing tantrums.

This isn’t enough to hold the film together, but it provides the basis of a spindly plot: Vance has to leave Yale Law School for a couple of days to put his mom in rehab. So he drives out to Middletown, Ohio and thinks about his childhood. We spend half the film in repetitive flashbacks to the Olden Days (the late 1990s in this case) so we can see Mom when she was younger, and busy doing — well, drugs, sex, and tantrums. Not a lot of character development, as I say.

The film has one enjoyable scene in which Mom (Amy Adams) pops pills and goes rollerskating through the corridors of the hospital where she works. This is almost entirely the invention of screenwriter and director; the book barely alludes to such an episode, apparently as a figure of speech. For the film, it’s a plot point for Mom to get fired and begin her never-ending cycle of rehab and relapse.

Details of rehab and Mom’s varied pharmacopeia might make for an interesting story if she were more interesting herself, but then we’d have an entirely different film. A black comedy, perhaps, a cross between Drugstore Cowboy and Valley of the Dolls. But authentic details are what this film lacks throughout. I wanted to know what sort of meds make so you so energetic and euphoric that you’re ready to make your nursing rounds in a pair of high-topped day-glow rollerskates. Such pills may exist, but I doubt they’re stocked in hospital pharmacy cabinets. Low-information viewers may suppose she’s popping OxyContin (“hillbilly heroin,” you know). And that may well be what the filmmakers were trying to imply. Vance’s real-life Mom did seem to do a lot of opioids.

But trust me here: opiates don’t make you want to go to the roller rink.

The film has been roundly mocked by critics for the shallowness of its characters and its dime-store sentimentality. The star attraction is Glenn Close, her bunny-boiling days far behind her. Here she’s unrecognizable as Vance’s granny, a foul-mouthed white-trash harridan they call “Mamaw” (may-maw). Close is wasted here, because they put all the effort into makeup instead of fleshing out her character into something other than a horrible old crone who says “fuck” a lot. And, oh yeah, at one point in a flashback she tries to immolate her drunken husband with gasoline and a match. This is another bit of family hearsay Vance writes about in passing. But like Glenn Close, it’s wasted in the film. Just one more random episode telling us that Mamaw was one nasty piece of work.

I read Hillbilly Elegy when it first came out in 2016, and have been revisiting bits of it on Kindle. Along with another book published around the same time (White Trash), Elegy provided an intriguing sidebar to the political news of that election season. Both books had been in the works for several years, so they weren’t thrown together on short notice as weapons against the Trump presidential campaign. But that is what they became. Nearly every print review and on-air discussion regarded them as a commentary upon the MAGA crowds: Rosetta Stones you could use to decipher the Trump phenomenon.

You can buy Greg Johnson’s Graduate School with Heidegger here

Because, you see, Trump’s supporters — so the story went — were mostly aggrieved working-class whites. Of course, this wasn’t true at all; exit polls in November showed Trump sweeping (white) voters of every sex, class, and income level. But during the campaign, this insinuation looked like wickedly clever disinformation, aimed at socially anxious middle-class voters afraid of slipping into prole-hood.

This theme came up whenever J.D. Vance appeared on talking-head shows. Interviewers would mention Hillbilly Elegy, but seldom ask Vance about anything in the book — his time in the Marines, his drug-addicted mother, or what constitutes a true hillbilly. No, it was always: “Tell us what all those poor-white Trump voters are angry about?” And Vance would say, “Oh, they’re aggrieved because the factory closed down and they feel left behind.”

Or words to that effect. This routine never got old. Here’s the lede of a Slate interview in August 2016:

For the past year, no question has captivated journalists and pundits more than this one: Why do the people supporting Donald Trump support Donald Trump? In his new best-selling book . . . J.D. Vance tells a personal story about his family’s struggles in Appalachia and a political one about the white Americans who make up a strong base of support for the Republican nominee.

Slate toned down the headline after it went live, but the URL gives the game away. Trump! Racism! White working class!

When I first dipped into it, what struck me about Vance’s book was how profoundly dishonest it is. I don’t think this because the author was consciously disingenuous. But look: this Ohio native is not a hillbilly, and he’s not even named J. D. Vance. He used a variety of names growing up, and that’s the pseudonym he settled upon in adulthood, perhaps for the sake of his relatives’ privacy. What he is is a huckster who doesn’t know it. He thinks he has tender, tragic experiences to sell you, but when he opens his cardboard suitcase of samples, it’s just what you expect: snake-oil bottles, and they’re all empty. Our naïve huckster doesn’t think you’ll notice, or at least you won’t be mean-spirited enough to point it out. Vance’s emotional life, as expressed in the memoir, looks to be one part greeting-card sentiment and two parts clichés and third-hand verities. This is why the characterizations in the book (and the film) are so vapid.

Some other examples. Vance tells you his family tried to be good Christians. “The Christian faith stood at the center of our lives. . .” But — aha! “We never went to church, except on rare occasions.” And do we ever see them going to church, or at least praying? We do not. And although the book often seems to be a nonstop exercise in navel-gazing, you never find Vance wrestling with thorny issues of philosophy, let alone theology. Generalizations and easy factoids are more his bag. He tells you his ancestors were “Scots-Irish” because, I guess, he’s heard that’s what people in Appalachia are, but he’s never gone looking for details.

I do not identify with the WASPs of the Northeast. Instead, I identify with the millions of working-class white Americans of Scots-Irish descent who have no college degree. . . To understand me, you must understand that I am a Scots-Irish hillbilly at heart.

(Introduction, Hillbilly Elegy)

What a load of piffle. With a little bit of effort he could trace his genealogy and maybe find out some interesting particulars, but he hasn’t bothered to. Instead, he serves up vague family legends about how a distant cousin of his grandfather’s was “hillbilly royalty” because he married into the Hatfield clan (as in the Hatfield-McCoy feud). Not only is Mr. J. D. Vance not really J. D. Vance, he’s basically Mister Anomie.

Our Mr. Anomie needs to believe that he grew up in a landscape peopled with Godless degenerates who eschew both religion and book-larnin’ because he can then wonder rhetorically why they’ve all made a mess of their lives. Huckleberry Finn just had old Pap as an example of what happens when you turn off the strait-and-narrow; but in Vance-land, it’s implied that Pap Finns are standard issue.

Except of course they’re not. And if you actually read the book, and not the publisher’s blurb or a reviewer’s précis, you see Vance had a pretty comfortable suburban-style upbringing.

A broken home, sure, and some minor instances of domestic violence, but he was always secure in the bosom of a loving family (grandparents and a sister, at least; and an uncle in Napa, California who’d fly him and his sister out for visits). There was always food on the table, so that J. D. turned into quite the chubster by fifth grade. In high school, his family gives him a set of golf clubs and he tries out for the school golf team. Not exactly what you’d call “underprivileged.” He didn’t make the team, but this ambition is not the mark of someone suffering from narrow horizons and scanty opportunities.

He wasn’t orphaned, abandoned, thrown out into the street, or held prisoner in a dirt-floor cabin like Huck. His much-married, neglectful mother may have been certifiable, but that part of his history isn’t much different from what you’ll find in New Canaan, Connecticut. My uncle once told me that when he went to the University of Pennsylvania in the Thirties, he was amazed at how all the preppy guys had parents who had been married two, three, four times. Divorce, like golf, was still mainly a sport of the haute-bourgeoisie. Vance pities himself because that easygoing moral decay has spread so far it’s touched his own family.

He imagines his circumstances have improved grandly when he gets to Yale Law School, but they really haven’t. He’s just found a new set of amoral people to whom he can pipe his tale of deprivation. Hard-luck upbringing is his calling card: he’s of hillbilly stock and attended a state college, poor baby. A professor and advisor at law school is none other than “Tiger Mom” Amy Chua, a Chinoise with a Jewish husband who preens herself on having instilled a creed of hard work, violin practice, and hard-nosed ambition into her daughters. Under the tutelage of Chua and his book editors, Vance re-engineers his sentimental memoir into a moral fable of Leftist sociology. Meanwhile, he freelances a bit, instructing National Review readers that his hillbilly confrères are all voting for Trump in 2016 because they’re backward and bigoted. As a capper, Vance marries a nonwhite (an East Indian named Usha), thereby achieving a level of dissolution seldom reached in fewer than four generations of trailer trash.

I’m being cruel and heartless to poor J. D. because I want to make a point. There’s some rich material in his story and it could easily fill out a screenplay treatment or two, though not the one currently on Netflix. Here’s one: A lower-middle-class guy from the Midwest prides himself on having “hillbilly” forebears, and then weaves himself a personal history in which all his growing pains and family eruptions are somehow traceable to this imagined heritage. He rides this horse to success, pleading a poverty-stricken and mangled childhood to get into Yale Law School, and then lands a fat corporate-law job in Silicon Valley. He secures a book contract on the strength of a tendentious memoir in which he airs his family’s dirty linen in public. He becomes a TV political pundit and specializes in telling the chattering classes exactly what they want to believe about the white working class and mainstream Americans in general.

A story, in short, of hard-nosed cynical ambition, right up there with The Wolf of Wall Street.

If you want to support Counter-Currents, please send us a donation by going to our Entropy page and selecting “send paid chat.” Entropy allows you to donate any amount from $3 and up. All comments will be read and discussed in the next episode of Counter-Currents Radio, which airs every weekend on DLive.

Don’t forget to sign up for the twice-monthly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.



  1. Theodora
    Posted November 30, 2020 at 9:43 am | Permalink

    I loathe the misrepresentations of our people, particularly Southerners and Hillbillies. Thanks for this excellent take-down of pretension and deceit. I enjoyed it.

  2. steve
    Posted November 30, 2020 at 11:10 am | Permalink

    I concur; thanks ‘Margot’.

  3. 3g4me
    Posted November 30, 2020 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    Brilliant and well-deserved takedown of a long-running con. As for the denouement, you note the con is on ‘Vance’ himself. His progeny with Usha will fit right in with his publisher and social circle, and not at all with any real American Scots-Irish . . . so who is alienating whom?

  4. Apex Predator
    Posted November 30, 2020 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    Another grifter you can add in with all the other milquetoast grifters who like to ‘interpret’ the poor white experience for the managerial classes. They look at these people like zoo animal curiosities and need some ‘brave’ zookeeper to explain what they are looking at. I dream of a day when the -real- hillbillies show up on their doorsteps with pitchforks & torches to give them a more ‘representative’ experience of what they seem to have such fascination with.

  5. Posted November 30, 2020 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    Vance’s cutting-edge analysis: “Hillbillies are bad people.”

    • Apex Predator
      Posted November 30, 2020 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

      Glad to see you landed on your feet here Jim. You catch a lot of sh-t from WN circles because I think you (smartly) do not wear that particular label since it still bears a pretty negative connotation. I think your viewpoint aligns with a lot of WN goals and you state as much. (I’ve read your books and articles for years so its fairly obvious).

      My own feeling is that Euro-centrism is a much better way to say WN because words matter, especially in a hyper sensitive media w/ cancel culture. You can easily use soft language to convey your message and it is only now that I think lots of people on the dissident right are starting to get that. (Normie still has a long way to go sadly) It has been going on with the left for a long long time. They loooove euphemisms like ‘good school district’ to hide their racism which really means ‘no darkies.’ We can take a page from that playbook…

      You also rightly acknowledge that many human being are assholes of -all- races which has been my experience as well. Your misanthropic piss-takes are comical to me as they relate to my own ethos and sense of humor. Taki’s lost some talent methinks.

    • margot metroland
      Posted November 30, 2020 at 5:56 pm | Permalink

      Good commentary, Jim.

      I considered bringing my own ancestors and distant cousins from Appalachia, also mainly of Irish-Scots-English-Norwegian extraction, who were city fathers and professors and schoolteachers and machinists and coal miners … but in the end, so many of us have this story, and can say, “You’re not special.”

      You can have an upbringing as privileged as J.D. Vance can enviously imagine, but at the end of the day, people of all classes go nutso, do drugs and booze, and see domestic violence. Hence my “New Canaan” remark.

    • Theodora
      Posted December 1, 2020 at 12:32 pm | Permalink

      I’m reading your book, “The Bomb Inside My Brain”. Your father and grandfather both died at age 59?

      As we’re talking book reviews, have you ever read any of Charles Willeford’s books? I’d never heard of him until I saw the movie– yes, the one with Mick Jagger and Donald Sutherland– “The Burnt Orange Heresy” and became curious about the source material. Mr Willeford had a hard early life and became a very funny and original writer. He reminds me a bit of you, Mr Goad, although a generation or so earlier; his life even resembles yours a bit in that he moved from the West Coast to find himself more at home in the South.

      Mr Willeford wrote memoirs of his life during the Depression, “I Was Looking for a Street” and of his career in the military, “Something about a Soldier”. It was just a thought… but he might help to put some of the pieces of your own family together.

  6. Fenterliarck
    Posted November 30, 2020 at 5:18 pm | Permalink

    A well-written but overlong article on a book I’d never read, although I understand the syndrome; the supposedly ‘conservative’ writer makes his mint by dumping any of his class, race, or upbringing.
    As it is, I’m from a small town, semi-southern background, and when I wrote a memoir of growing up, it wasn’t very kind to some aspects of my life, but I wasn’t caustic; I was honest, and there were aspects of my small-town upbringing that were commendable, others provincial. A good writer keeps a balance.
    I think instead of reading Vance, I’ll settle for the writings of Daniel Woodrell, an Ozark writer who captures a lot of the region’s despair and strength. His novel Winter’s Bone (there is also a good movie of it), is brilliant in studying families dealing with drugs, clans, and loyalty. His Ride with the Devil is an excellent Civil War story covering this same theme. Also a great movie; directed by And Lee, of course. Hollywood’s usual ‘great’ directors wouldn’t have told it honestly.
    I’m familiar With Missouri writers who dump their state, go to NYC and become literary lions, usually because they carp on Missouri, etc., and, in Miltonic fashion, explain the ways of god to man, such as ‘why do they vote conservative?’ I recall Jonathan Franzen. Although he is 100 percent NYC literary class, is still seem as a ‘Missouri writer,’ and so is an authority on life west of the Hudson.
    Being accepted by the literary class means you buy into their mores.
    I was thinking about a recent film I saw, Bring Him Home, dealing with Montana in 1960. As it is, the men take second place to a war between two women, and one woman’s family is full of violent, psychotic men dominated by her; pretty much the standard liberal canard that all small towns are evil, bigoted, full of crazy rednecks and are always ‘hiding a secret.’ Sort of the world established by The Ox-Bow Incident and Tennessee Williams.
    Odd how Kevin Kostner helped finance it, but his character is second fiddle, as it is standard policy now that women’s stories and POV figure more than men.

    • Troy Skaggs
      Posted December 4, 2020 at 1:24 pm | Permalink

      I’d suggest Donald Ray Pollock, an extraordinary talent who, unlike Vance, still lives and writes in Ohio.

  7. J
    Posted November 30, 2020 at 5:50 pm | Permalink

    Hey, thanks. Well said. As a native Kentuckian and having been to Vance’s supposed home of Jackson County, KY on more than one occasion, I can say that this man is a charlatan. Many of his family members and people who knew him around here have no respect for him because of his condescending attitude.

    • margot metroland
      Posted December 4, 2020 at 8:10 am | Permalink

      And thank you, J.

      I’m hesitant to beat up on people who are in the throes of pain and despair themselves, but this individual has clearly exhausted his usefulness.

  8. Posted November 30, 2020 at 7:29 pm | Permalink

    Sounds like another case of Hollywood types making fun of the people who grow their food. Awesome!

    • nineofclubs
      Posted December 1, 2020 at 10:48 pm | Permalink

      Interesting take. My Australian grandparents thought buying vegetables at the supermarket was a sign of profligate waste. In the 1950’s, 40% of fruit and veg consumed in Melbourne was grown at home.

      The white working class has few friends around the globe. The new left hates our social conservatism. The capitalist right hates us for our economic socialism.

      We need to look after ourselves.

  9. Jerome
    Posted November 30, 2020 at 8:10 pm | Permalink

    Great review, I was thinking of watching this movie on Netflix, now I won’t bother….

  10. Anonymous
    Posted December 1, 2020 at 9:48 am | Permalink

    F. Roger Devlin had a much more sympathetic review in Amren:

    I didn’t read the book, but can say as someone who grew up in what is sometimes called “Greater Appalachia,”(Arklansas) that I can totally understand why Vance would be uninterested in his ethnic origins. Most of us consider ourselves just plain “Americans.” The culture we grew up in defines us far more than the exact corner of Europe our ancestors came from.

    • Scott Weisswald
      Posted December 1, 2020 at 11:31 am | Permalink

      It would be perfectly fine if Vance didn’t care about his ethnicity. But he made a point of being not-a-WASP, and trotted out the Scots-Irish thing as if it actually mattered to him. I also find it difficult to believe any “hillbilly” wouldn’t get an earful about his ancestors that wouldn’t eventually include where it was from the Old Country they came from, and if Vance is more than happy to provide us with information about the “royal” blood in his clan, wanting clarification about the whole Scots-Irish thing isn’t exactly a big ask. Vance being a huckster, of course, it’s equally fair to assume that he doesn’t know a lick or has lied about it.

  11. Posted December 1, 2020 at 8:13 pm | Permalink

    I feel no affinity for America nor the supposed modern day “country boy.”
    Other than a slight Southern accent spoken nowadays by modern
    “country people”,they are no different than the rest of America.
    Gutter mouth hateful back stabbing spoiled computer addicts with various addictions.
    Im a drug addict myself but try to maintain empathy consideration chivalry manners etc…
    Good luck doing that nowadays around 45 yr old city rednecks covered in Tats nose-rings + faded Limp Bizkit shirts and gutter mouth hateful spoiled cutthroat damaged frazzled haired city redneck broads.
    “Sum bitch,that nigga think he better an
    (than) me,and he’s a damn crossback.”
    (Crossback is Freemason slang for Catholics)
    Maybe im a whiney bitch + pissed off because i failed,or combination of it all.
    Some days me + the modern city rednecks are cool w each other and other days they hate me for better reasons while having similar problems.
    Long story short the old school salt of Earth country boy and girl are long gone.
    The entire
    “Hillbilly country boy” life are from a bygone era that’s not coming back.
    God bless.

  12. Troy Skaggs
    Posted December 4, 2020 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

    I read Hillbilly Elegy in 2016 and my immediate thought was, “J.D., you are no Donald Ray Pollock.” Pollock is an extraordinarily talented writer who grew up near Chillicothe, OH. His firsthand experience with addiction and years of factory labor among other experiences lend an empathy and depth to his work that Mr.Vance simply lacks. I’d suggest the short story collection Knockemstiff, OH for starters. Unlike Vance, Mr. Pollock still resides in Ohio. As per usual in today’s publishing universe, Vance has probably outsold Pollock many many times over. Petty Lies and petty memoires are a lucrative balm for troubled times. So it goes.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace