Counter-Currents
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 237
The Dishonest Campaign Against Ricardo Duchesne
Counter-Currents Radio
108 words / 54:50
To listen in a player, click here. To download the mp3, right-click here and choose “save link as” or “save target as.”
Greg and John reconvene the weekly podcast to discuss the dishonest politically correct campaign against the courageous defender of the West, Professor Ricardo Duchesne.
- 0:00: Introduction
- 0:09: Donations: We have raised $16,909.92 since the beginning of our annual fundraiser. Thanks to all our donors so far.
- 3:43: The dishonest campaign against Ricardo Duchesne
Articles mentioned:
- Nick Robins-Early, “The White Supremacist Professor Teaching At A Public University“
- Collin Cleary, “Ricardo Duchesne’s The Uniqueness of Western Civilization,” Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5
- Collin Cleary, “And Then They Came for Ricardo Duchesne“
[give_form id=”93964″]
6 comments
I see that Youtube has censored your channel for ‘hate’.
Will you be moving to Bitchute??
Thank you for the very informative podcast. It looks like Matthew Sears managed to get Rate My Professors to take out his horrible teaching profile after Colin Cleary put a link to it in his article, https://counter-currents.com/2019/05/and-then-they-came-for-ricardo-duchesne/
This is what you get now from Rate My Professors: https://www.ratemyprofessors.com/invalid.jsp
I don’t feel we should have to continually wrestle with the left’s rhetoric about us.
Clearly the left designate any tendency for whites to advocate, or even show an interest for their own group, or history as ‘white supremacy’, and on that level it is one of their puerile devices to police thought and twist language, it has no analytical or intellectual value, it is pure rhetoric. We might as well call them anything unpleasant or stigmatizing we want.
However, in the real world, in the way global politics inevitably unfolds, there are powerful states and less powerful ones. Yes, I want a world run by white people, not Africans or Muslims or Chinese. I want white ethno states to enforce their exclusivity, those states need to be powerful enough to defend themselves.
In that sense I think most peoples are ‘supremacists’, in that it is completely natural and healthy to desire that your people are on top, your people are winning, your people can call the shots and that your people can survive as that people.
You should at least know that proclaiming your desire for a world run by white people will turn off all liberals and most sane people in our society instantly.
You should know that colonialism was miserable for the Africans and Asians who were dominated by whites, just as it would be miserable for you to be dominated by them. For you to boldly proclaim that you don’t care is to say that you don’t believe in the golden rule. A “pro tip” here is that normal people don’t trust others who do not follow the golden rule, in case you can’t tell.
It doesn’t matter how hard you try to copy the respectful tone of Greg Johnson’s writing, if you are expressing a desire to dominate the world, you are going to lose arguments and make it even harder for white advocates like myself to even negotiate a right to an ethnostate at all.
If you don’t believe in negotiation, that leaves you with force, if you intend to win. So your comment can be interpreted as a callous call to use of force in acheiving revolutionary, imperialistic objectives. Congrats, bro, it’s people like you who get all white advocates demonetized.
Wow! Double wow! I’ve been ‘away’ for a while & I’d forgotten just how excellent Counter Currents is! Keep up the good work!
I’m not sure if this is a good idea but I think it may be beneficial if an appropriate number of high caliber White Nationalists did a stream or something to discuss the trajectory of the movement. TRS, Counter Currents, American Renaissance, James Allsup, Richard Spencer and more. All these people and groups are doing great things on their own. That said, our movement is still fractious and lacks cohesion. Perhaps I’m wrong, but maybe a discussion where we focus inward rather than outward, not just what we’re up against but how we can recover a sense of common purpose and confidence.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.