Print April 3, 2019 13 comments
Video of the Day
Against Right-Wing Terrorism
Here is the video of Greg Johnson’s talk at the Scandza Forum in Stockholm last Saturday, March 30. Greg discusses the many trends which indicate why those on the Right should be feeling optimistic about the future, given that our metapolitical efforts are beginning to bear fruit, and why the desperate situation that Right-wing terrorists and their supporters feel that they have been forced into simply isn’t borne out by the facts.
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 534 Interview with Alexander Adams
Notes on Strauss & Husserl
Remembering Oswald Spengler (May 29, 1880-May 8, 1936)
Remembering Louis-Ferdinand Céline (May 27, 1894–July 1, 1961)
Nueva Derecha vs. Vieja Derecha Capítulo 1: Política y Metapolítica
Remembering Richard Wagner (May 22, 1813-February 13, 1883)
Remembering Dominique Venner (April 16, 1935–May 21, 2013)
Springtime in Tallinn
Notice: Trying to get property 'ID' of non-object in /home/clients/030cab2428d341678e5f8c829463785d/sites/counter-currents.com/wp-content/themes/CC/php/helpers/custom_functions_all.php on line 150
Omg, we actually get to see Greg Johnson’s face!
And all this time I was under the impression he was a mask-adorned faceless hero, badly burned in some kind of accident, like in V For Vendetta.
Human… all too human!
You know, I don’t think it even matters. I’m against terrorism because it’s immoral and ineffective, but as to its strategic value, I don’t think it matters at all. Before Breivik and Tarrant and Charlottesville, right wingers were considered dangerous potential terrorists who must be repressed. Afterward, much the same. Little if any change. The Amazon bannings were before Tarrant.
Now look at Muslim terrorism. The most spectacular, jaw dropping terrorist events in history with 911, Orlando, Manchester, baclan(sp?). The consensus is that Muslims must be protected from reprisal and assumption guilt for sharing an ideology, and Muslim immigration has increased since 911.
Reality doesn’t matter. It’s what the elites say that shapes people’s minds. If anything, Charlottesville resulted in the greatest reprisal and repression, and that was merely a peaceful demonstration, not planned as “terrorism.”
We’ve been targeted for a long time by these leftards (who r our ethnicity, our race). After such terrible terrorist events we r even more targeted by our own so-called people. It’s embarrassing, our own ethnicity/race is working towards our own demise. Whitey is having yet another civil war (American Civil War, WWI & WWII), except, this time it is toying w/extinction. If we survive this, we HAVE TO DESIGN our future in such a way that this can NEVER happen again. These leftards can NEVER b allowed to live amongst us, &, to install a system that if & when they appear living in our new society that their removal is permanent. And, it would b a one-way removal, returning can never b an option. They do not serve our common good, in fact, they eventually lead to our destruction.
What a great speaker you are. You are truly the voice of reason in this movement. And urging an end to ‘lone wolf vigilante’ action is much needed. Truly we have to gain greater numbers, and many more voices of quiet reason, before we can actually physically confront the enemy. I am older, and am not a good speaker, so it is a treasure to find someone of your caliber. You are a speaker that women can listen to and understand. Please continue to urge calmness and reason in the movement, and greater education, as you do in your books. I am wondering if there is any way we can get involved — unobtrusively — in home schooling by using some of your writings. I think that reaching children is the best way to stop this nonsense now being taught in public schools. Well, I guess that’s a big topic for another time. Thanks for posting the video of this speech
There is nothing to criticize here; this is what I was envisioning when, during the dizzying collapse of the Spencer-Enoch-Anglin Triumvirate, I cried out “Elevate this man now!”
Greg understood and understands the Triumverate as a dead end. I know the smirks he is referring to when he says bluntly that he wants to knock the smirk off the face of the movement.
But nature abhors a vacuum.
With what to fill that vacuum? Truth? Yes. Morality? Yes, of course.
An unspecified white nation?
People will be intrigued, but there the vacuum will be exposed – no roadmap to getting to our new nation, and thus all the energy, all the drive, all the angst and fear cannot be captured and channeled into useful work, but will turn instead into entropy whether in the form of Hitler salutes or spree shooters.
The racial divorce will not happen by magic, people will not give us a blank check for a leap into the unknown – they want a roadmap that is plausible.
I believe the real roadmap to this is raising consciousness of a nation or group’s inherent right to self-determination. If more of the West recognized this as a right, then we would start having places like South Africa’s Orania that will thrive and be beacons of light.
A people have a right to self-determination.
I agree with the the points made, and I want to add another. I cannot help but wondering what “we” should do.
Yes, “we” should preach and convert where possible, but that is not enough. As you mentioned, they have all the power, and increasingly also the power to exclude “us” from the economy.
That is something “we” need to address.
Imo there is no other option but to build a parallel economy. With a parallel currency, a parallel economic ethos, and a parallel judicial system. Just how, that is a difficult question, one that I would love to discuss and work on with like minded people.
I would stress that such an alternate system must be completely legal. Otherwise it would misused by criminals and loose its appeal to that segment of the population “we” should reach for.
Greg Johnson does not seem to realize that the rate of White decline is more accurately described by a geometric progression than by a simple arithmetic slope. We do not have 200 or 300 left before we reach the point of racial no-return.
I find his lack of urgency to be disturbing.
Johnson argues that white discontent will turn the situation once the ruling
circles have made it sufficiently unbearable. Hence no need for terror.
Are there any historical examples where this kind of strategy has ever worked?
The historical pattern is that revolutions are driven by upstarts, never
by the oppressed. Rulers are always accutely aware of the oppressed. They keep
adjusting their policies so that the oppression stays in place. Rulers have to
be caught from the sidelines to be ousted from power.
According to Johnson, North Korea should be ripe for revolution. No sign of that.
Terror commited by the oppressed has never worked, so you could argue from there.
To break the historical pattern, something external has to happen that weakens
the grip rulers have on society. It could be war or a catastrophe. But such things
can hardly be influenced.
How about thinking the unthinkable and actually giving rulers with their leftist/
globalist ideology what they claim to be striving for, open borders? Globalist
loyalists most often live in white ghettos, engaging in hypocrisy. They are
generally least prepared for the society-wide breakdown that truly open borders would
After a period of brutal Darwinian group selection, those Whites would survive that
are able to form sufficiently tight-knit, combative, ethno-centric communities.
It’s easy to imagine what sections of society such communities would originate from.
It would not be the city-dwelling globalist left.
What is now the Western world would become a giant Middle East 2.0 replete with
ethno-centrism and ethnic strife.
But (some!) Whites would survive, just like some Whites or rather Christians survive
in the Middle East and North Africa.
“What’s the most rational way to go about changing the regime?… We can’t outgun them, we can’t outspend them, but we can out-argue them. And we can mock them, and humiliate them, and cause them to ragequit and break their spirits. We can do that, and we need to get back to what’s succesful.”
Two months before important EU elections, and political action is not even discussed?
Explain to us your vision of political action.
I don’t understand this request. It’s not “my vision”. It’s the strategy of all the populists in power today: Orbán, PiS, Salvini, Baudet.
Work work work work, win elections, then use the power of your office to advance your agenda.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Edit your comment