1,743 words
Another CPAC has come and gone, and national populism was almost non-existent at this year’s conservative gala.
Even though Donald Trump became president on a national populist agenda that challenged conservative orthodoxy on immigration, foreign policy, trade, and state power, CPAC 2019 offered the impression he won on the stale conservatism of Ronald Reagan.
The major themes of CPAC 2019 were the evils of socialism (but no mention of why it’s becoming popular), the sheer awesomeness of Israel, pandering to non-whites, and the greatness of capitalism. There was only one panel on immigration, none advocating foreign policy realism, and just two speeches that delivered a nationalist message. One was from the Italian nationalist politician Giorgia Meloni, which largely went unnoticed.
The other was from conservative commentator Michelle Malkin, which did get noticed. Malkin scorched Republican leaders for failing their voters on immigration and insisted diversity is not a strength. It was the highlight of a depressing conference that banned nationalists and followed the orders of Left-wing reporters.
The low point of the conference came from Trump himself. The president gave a rambling, two-hour speech on the final day of the conference in which he voiced support for increasing immigration. “We want people to come in. We need workers to come in, but they’ve got to come in legally and they’ve got to come in through merit,” Trump said, admitting this message was different from what he campaigned on.
The reason for this alleged need to increase immigration was to satisfy the demands of “our corporations,” a sentiment alien to the spirit of national populism. Trump once promised a new movement on the Right that would push the interests of white America against the dictates of globalism. Now we’re treated to the same old platitudes. “We stand with Israel!” “Socialism sucks!” “Tax cuts rock!” It’s movement conservatism dressed up with funny tweets and quasi-populist bravado.
There’s unfortunately a group that represents this sad vision of Trumpism—sans the funny tweets. Turning Point USA was the dominant presence at CPAC, according to The Daily Beast. TPUSA’s young leader, Charlie Kirk, had a presence everywhere, including a giant cardboard cutout of himself that CPAC attendees could take a picture with. Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel praised Kirk and fellow TPUSA figure Candace Owens, saying the party needs more leaders like them. Several other speakers, including President Trump, also gave shout outs to Kirk, Owens, and TPUSA for the “incredible work” the group does.
TPUSA represents Trumpism stripped of nationalist policies and a clear sense of purpose. This is Trumpism as a personality cult advocating for low-IQ movement conservatism. It doesn’t fight for white America, it grifts off white America.
TPUSA’s mission statement claims it is a group that works “to educate students about the importance of fiscal responsibility, free markets, and limited government. Through non-partisan debate, dialogue, and discussion, Turning Point USA believes that every young person can be enlightened to true free market values.”
That hardly sounds like America First nationalism.
The group is bankrolled by numerous conservative donors and is the most prominent conservative student group at the moment. That achievement is largely due to its founder, Charlie Kirk, glomming onto the Trump family and moment. Kirk hasn’t really changed the message of the group to conform to the Trump moment outside of sycophantic praise for the president. The 25-year-old TPUSA leader is still primarily concerned with promoting the glories of capitalism and how kids just want tax cuts.
Kirk showcased this divergence from the populist zeitgeist in a debate with Fox News host Tucker Carlson. Tucker suggested America should think of itself as a family, to which Kirk loudly objected. “It is not government’s role to take care of its citizens!” Kirk argued. Carlson laughed at that claim and wondered what’s the role of government if not to take care of its citizens. Kirk only offered the government’s responsibility “to provide for the national defense”… which is taking care of its citizens.
Campaign Trump would have taken Carlson’s side. The then-candidate’s arguments against mass immigration, neoconservative foreign policy, and bad trade deals always focused on how these things hurt American citizens and it was the government’s job to right these wrongs. National Review writer Kevin Williamson attacked candidate Trump for imagining the nation as a family in his infamous 2016 essay hoping for the death of white working-class communities.
Candace Owens is the perfect symbol of the degraded Trumpism TPUSA promotes. Owens didn’t even vote for Trump. In 2016, she was a public liberal who ran a dox site focused on “racists.” Soon after Trump won, Candace rebranded as “RedPillBlack” and made videos on how Democrats were the real racists. Based blacks are always a hit with white conservatives, and Owens has milked the grift for all its worth. She’s a leader of the conservative movement and just launched her own show on the very popular PragerU YouTube channel.
It’s unclear what political principles Ms. Owens has besides grabbing attention and supporting whatever Trump does. The only policy she has advocated with gusto is criminal justice reform, a policy she claims would win over non-white felons for the GOP. Owens has accused Republicans who oppose this policy that would prioritize the interests of non-whites over the safety of whites of, gasp!, racism. She derided Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton’s opposition to the policy as a denial of “opportunity to millions of black Americans.”
That statement smacks of the “identity politics” TPUSA rails against, but on that issue, the group displays remarkable hypocrisy. Judging by the group’s conferences and rhetoric, the only form of identity politics that is not okay is white identity politics. TPUSA has organized leadership conferences for blacks, Hispanics, and women and it frequently touts Trump’s dumb talking points about how much his presidency is benefitting women and minorities.
Owens is spearheading the ultimate expression of conservative non-white identity politics: “Blexit.” Blexit is a well-funded venture to convince blacks to leave the Democrat plantation. The primary pitches are: Dems R The Real Racists, low black unemployment, Kanye West, and criminal justice reform. So far, Blexit hasn’t made any inroads in the black community for the GOP. It was debuted right before the election, but, once again, less than ten percent of blacks voted Republican in 2018. The first Blexit event in January drew in a predominately white audience, demonstrating this latest endeavor at non-white pandering is a farce.
Kirk and Owens aren’t just limiting their efforts to the US. In February, Turning Point UK was launched with a bevy of minority faces fronting the group. One of the first videos put out by TPUK included a list of what they are fighting for and what they are fighting against. The things TPUK fights for are: free markets, free speech, free nations, free people, limited government, personal responsibility, and common sense. What they fight against: socialism, racism, identity politics, alt-right, alt-left, nativism, and collectivism.
In other words, they fight for the interests of corporations against genuine nationalism. The video outlining what they fight for claims they want to work with “mainstream organizations” to “build a fresh movement.” The purpose of the group appears to play gatekeeper for the British Right and exclude actual nationalists from the discussion.
TPUK’s other videos are similarly goofy, sporting such titles as, “Sorry to disappoint, but I’m not a socialist,” “The Racism of the Left,” “I’m Conservative and Gay. So What?,” and “I’m Literally a Capitalist.” Unsurprisingly, the launch of the group was met with mockery and derision by the British. Leftists mocked it on Twitter, journos called the cucky group “alt-right,” and the Conservative Party warned its young members to not associate with TPUK. The good bit of news is that the group won’t be able to play gatekeeper due to its low reputation. The bad news is that the group netted the support of prominent politicians like Jacob Rees-Mogg and has plenty of funding to continue its stupid mission.
TPUSA raised $8.2 million from July 2016 to June 2017 largely on the premise it would wean young people away from socialism and big government. However, the main consumers of TPUSA’s message are boomers. According to the data gleaned from TPUSA’s Facebook advertising, the primary demographic for the group’s terrible memes is the 55-64 age group. People under the age of 34 constitute less than eight percent of the average consumer pool for TPUSA’s ads.
It should be no surprise that this group struggles to win over young people. Its aesthetics are terrible, its message is Boomer-fried, its most famous activism put college students in diapers, and its leaders are obvious grifters. Compare the astroturfed nature to that of Identity Evropa, a bona fide youth movement that overcomes far more challenges to win over young people. That’s a group that actually expresses the Trump moment, but its leader, Patrick Casey, was banned from CPAC. Grifting is more acceptable than nationalism.
TPUSA’s continued success and influence is due to the Trump apparatus’ embrace of the group. It’s why the GOP celebrates their efforts and CPAC lets them run their event. National Review types dislike TPUSA as much as the Dissident Right does, but their distaste doesn’t seem to affect the group’s power.
Conservative youth groups have nearly always been stupid efforts to convince young people to embrace ideologies antithetical to their interests. TPUSA is just the most visible and influential expression of this trend. It would be nice if we could sit and laugh at their harmless diaper protests. Sadly, the people on the American Right with power think they’re awesome and prefer their message to the national populism of Tucker Carlson and Ann Coulter.
Trump didn’t win the presidency on TPUSA’s message. He won because he challenged the idiocy of Conservative Inc. and offered a new Right-wing alternative to the GOP’s failures. But since he won, the president has made too many concessions to the idiocy he ran and won against.
It appears that Trump’s 2020 message will have more in common with TPUSA than Carlson. Middle America will be treated to the tired message of tax cuts, more aid for Israel, “socialism bad,” and more immigrants for corporations. And Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens will be right there with Trump as he abandons Trumpism to tout TPUSAism.
National populism is still the most viable right-wing ideology in America. It just needs a new champion — or for its old champion to come to his senses.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
12 comments
Forget GOP politics for the time being. Right now all the excitement is in the Democratic Party, especially with this Ilhan Omar woman talking about Jewish influence on U.S. foreign policy. She is helping this issue to surface, and once we open the door to talking about Jewish influence on foreign policy we can’t help but talk about that influence on domestic policy.
I wouldn’t give her any praise, personally. This has been tried a lot: “Let’s support this one left-wing policy/politician, then we’ll ride their victory to the next step.” It’s never worked, once they win, they will only push further, you cannot control them, they will control you.
I’m not saying we “support” her. I’m saying we amplify her critique.
The Left has gone so far, so extreme, with its economic socialism, green-deals, gender-manias and white-hating that the Conservatives may get enough votes even without the trumpian populism&nationalism. In fact they can get them even if they do nothing else than reciting cliches. They sound normal and assuring when contrasted with what the Left proposes these days.
Developed in response to Trump’s challenge, the Left strategy of hyper-escalation (ideological and in the streets) has proved effective in maintaining the status-quo despite the success of Trump. It has proved effective in preventing GOP from drifting to the right. It would have been different, the opposite, had alt-right won a place in the public space during 2017.
Conservatives may get enough votes even without the trumpian populism&nationalism. In fact they can get them even if they do nothing else than reciting cliches. They sound normal and assuring when contrasted with what the Left proposes these days.
I respectfully disagree, and my gut says that the overnight rise of AOC and the oxymoron of iSocialism isn’t entirely a Democrat operation, that there are Deep State RINOs promoting and coordinating the hysteria. (Bernie Sanders isn’t a serious contender for 2020 either, he’s collecting more shekels for his family, and thereby aids in worrying clueless Boomers, which RINOs want). Why would RINOs do this?
Because iSocialism is a paper tiger that allows a diluted Trump admin to no longer boldly project “nationalism” and non-interventionist foreign policy as core platforms; what is happening: Trump can now point to a “radical Left,” with soundbite barbs, instead of presenting any progress with The Wall. He just said he’s for keeping US troops in Syria indefinitely. Boomers and millennials ignore this hypocrisy because AOC and Omar are a hot topic, strawmen for pitchforks.
I’m completely done with Trump. Only if he fires or demotes Jared Kushner will I reconsider. The “Finish the Wall” slogan of 2019 is surreal in its dumb-goy salesmanship, in the Information Age. Bait-and-switch. Trump has done a similar conjob with Syria, announces troops are leaving, then quietly waffles to Ziocons.
Hillary and Bloomberg bowing out of the 2020 race, when the field is lightweight, a joke now that Kamala Harris has a Smollett omelette on her face, telegraphs imo that Michelle Obama will run. And she will win. The narrative is too strong. Big Social Media has retreated in recent weeks, only as a catapult before Michelle announces, before the kill shot. Watch and see.
Tbh, with 2020 hindsight I now wish Hillary had won. The Right would be demanding heads by 2019, survival instincts would be amped. Trump’s smooth talk and rallies created an illusion. Now he’s a Reagan on the outside, a neocon puppet within, but I guess that is “normal” and none of us voted for that.
I agree with you Walling Out. Lets get Michelle Obama (Moboonga) into the presidency. It will help wake up the whites to have an angry fried chicken eating TSA employee in the white house. We should be doing our best to hamper Trump’s 2020 campaign. He’s unfortunately a traitor to us now.
We’ve been pointing out shylocks influence, well, since forever – don’t need this muslim bitch telling us. Bitch is in the HOR, where are we? Trumptards will be using the 4Dlgbtq@&# chess excuse to excuse this latest blowhard speech.
We can’t vote our way out – we are alone.
I must confess; I clicked on this just for Ovidiu’s comments. Kudos.
He should start writing articles if you ask me.
TPUSA represents Trumpism stripped of nationalism and clear purpose? Then the group’s existence is redundant…”Trumpism” itself is devoid of nationalism and clear purpose. Witness his handpicked selection of bloviating psychopaths, Pompeo, Bolton, the criminal Abrams. Or his ongoing schmooze-fests at the White House with his CEO pals, trying to determine how many invaders to invite to replace White workers. TPUSA is just the latest boil on the arse that is Conservatism, Inc.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment