Print this post Print this post

The Green Marchers

1,410 words

Recently, Hondurans from the 2018 illegal immigrant “caravan” attempted to cross the border from Tijuana into California. They seem to have been repulsed by the US Border Patrol, though many undoubtedly got through via the legal system. It was a close call. If the caravan actually crossed en masse, it would have been a crippling blow to the credibility of the Trump administration. Nonetheless this event is significant, for until 2018, no white Western military force has been able to beat “green marchers,” which is what the Honduran caravanners were.

What, you might ask, are green marchers? These are unarmed, semi-organized mobs of paupers that gain some objective by moving in massive, locust-style groups. The name was coined by the Moroccan government, although they were not the first people to use such a tactic. The wildly successful Moroccan Green March took place as the Spanish Fascist leader Francisco Franco was upon his death bed in November 1975.

At issue was the Spanish colony south of Morocco called the Spanish Sahara. In 1975, the Moroccans wanted to do a naked imperial land grab of the Spanish colony. Instead of mustering a large, well-trained army equipped with the latest weaponry and requiring a high-IQ, highly-trained bunch of soldiers to man such weapons, the Moroccan government transported thousands of peasants to the border with the Spanish Sahara, dubbed them “the Green March,” and sent them into the Spanish colony.

With their leader dying, the Spanish did not know what to do, so they lost their colony. It is not really a tragedy for a white country to lose what amounts to a Third World country – even a province in Northern Africa with an “off-white” population. But for the native Sahrawi of the Spanish Sahara who became ruled by Moors, the situation was a disaster. It is always a disaster for a people, any people to be ruled by Third Worlders.

Throughout the 20th century and beyond, green marchers have been quite effective.

Non-Violent Civil Disobedience

The green marchers’ tactics originate in the civil disobedience ideas[1] of New England Transcendentalist Henry David Thoreau, who famously spent a night in prison after symbolically refusing to pay a small tax levied for the Mexican War. The ideas of civil disobedience were first used practically on a large scale during the Indian Independence Movement which lasted from 1893 until 1948. The ideas of civil disobedience were also used by the Negro insurrection in the United States (often called the “civil rights” movement) which lasted from Brown vs. Board in 1954 until President Nixon’s election in 1969. (This insurrection is always simmering. It flared up again during Obama’s second term.)

Non-Violent civil disobedience as a tactic for pursuing political goals is misnamed. There is violence, but it is low-intensity violence the impact of which is magnified by biased reporting. “Non-violent” protesters trespass, push, go limp, and break minor laws. When the police respond, the protesters cry out in pain. The ultimate goal is to goad government forces to react with violence, at which point the media whips the public into a moral panic. It is important to note that the use of non-violent civil disobedience for a political goal doesn’t imply that the political goal is right and moral.

Ultimately green marchers turn their social and military weakness and inherent racial pathologies into advantages. Helplessness becomes a form of social dominance. Weeping becomes a means of gaining power. The slave becomes the master.

Other green marches include the march to Selma, Alabama on March 7, 1965. During that march, blacks trooped across the bridge – officially “peacefully” but actually were seeking a confrontation – and were repulsed by State Troopers. The result was a public relations debacle for Alabama’s whites. The Johnson Administration was thus able to move further on “civil rights.”

In 1980, the Mariel boatlift was a green march with a twist. In this case, the US Government and a great many anti-Communist thinkers thought that another batch of refugees fleeing Communism would help the Free World against the Communist World.[2] However, Cuba’s Communist Leader Fidel Castro was a step ahead of the listless and unfortunate President Carter. Castro used the exodus to rid himself of criminals, the mentally ill, and other problematic people. Castro ended up with fewer domestic political enemies and troublemakers.

The 2015 “Syrian” Refugee Crisis was also a green march. Large bands of military-aged men from the Islamic world, not necessarily Syria, moved from staging areas in Turkey to Greece and thence to Germany and Sweden via the same route the Ottoman Turks used to attack Vienna. Once in northern Europe, they quickly attached themselves to the welfare system and made nuisances of themselves.

A successful green march is a calamity for those in its path.

Today, Selma is a ruin. The United States is saddled with an anti-white, low-IQ Congressman John Lewis who coasts along in politics unchallenged because of his participation in the march as a young man. The green march to Selma was part of the transition the “civil rights” movement made from an elite-sponsored, everyone-play-fair social reform to the disaster people like George Lincoln Rockwell predicted that it would become. The natural culmination of “civil rights” was Haitian Revolution-style destruction.

In in Florida, the Mariel boatlift brought crime and social dysfunction. It was a factor in Carter’s loss in the 1980 election. (He won Florida in 1976 and lost it in 1980.)

In Germany 2015, the green marchers likewise left destruction in their wake. In addition to the mass rapes and sexual harassment in various cities, Angela Merkel’s political party was severely damaged, and the foundations of the European Union were shaken. Brexit happened in no small part because of the Refugee Crisis.

The Wider Political Ecosystem of Green Marches

One must wonder how unarmed mobs can be successful given the existence of weapons like the machine gun and obstacles like barbed wire. The answer is obvious. Guns don’t fire themselves. Using a machine gun is an act of will. Green marches cannot take place if there is political will to shoot. Green marches cannot succeed unless the target population has somehow lost its will to survive.

Green marchers also depend on the following additional factors:

  • The target country must be headed by a naive, weak leader such as Franco’s trembling successors, Jimmy Carter, or Angela Merkel, or a treacherous, but powerful leader like Lyndon Baines Johnson. Green marches exist in an ecosystem of bad decisions created by these sorts of leaders.
  • The media must be sympathetic to the green marchers. Palestinians cannot effectively green march.
  • The green marchers must be able to cloak themselves in religious archetypes, such as the role of the sacred victim in the religion of Negro Worship grips so many minds in the United States and elsewhere. Essentially, they must appear helpless, needy, and non-threatening – and the target audience needs to care about such people.
  • The target country’s government must be powerful enough that no native white extra-legal or paramilitary force can arise to resist the green marchers. (This factor is sometimes called anarcho-tyranny.)

A Counter to Green Marchers

During the Cold War, the United States embarked on a massive wave of technological innovation to counter Soviet gains in rocketry and other matters. However, there was no effort to counter green marchers in any circumstances.

The Cold War was waged and won along many fronts, from religion to pop music. So too must the resistance to green marchers. The following suggestions apply:

  • Numbers are of the essence. Reduce Third World birthrates.
  • Encourage Third World people to be guest workers in other Third World Countries. Central Americans should be employed in the Persian Gulf.
  • Encourage full employment for people in their native lands.
  • Barriers work. However, there are considerable legal issues. It is an act of war to shoot persons in Mexico, even non-Mexicans, from across the US border. We could, however, situate the barrier just inside the US so we could shoot trespassers with impunity.
  • Effective non-lethal crowd dispersion technologies must be developed. A massacre of green marchers is not a positive end.
  • Metapolitics is also important. The vast majority of Americans cannot admit to themselves that the presence of non-whites reduces their quality of life, although they carefully arrange their lives to not be around non-whites. If that changes, everything changes.



[2] This was not a baseless idea. Communism collapsed in Eastern Europe when East Germans started to move unhindered to West Germany in 1989. However, the racial factor is so obvious it doesn’t need to be spelled out.

This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , . Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  1. alexandra Patricia Ormsby
    Posted January 16, 2019 at 11:02 am | Permalink

    This concept of “green marchers” is brilliant and so perfectly describes the situation we are in with our Southern Border. Thanks for the clarification of their true intents. Living in Southern California, I can see first-hand the effects of the overpopulation of Mexicans and Central Americans. I am so very glad I found your site.

  2. Bob
    Posted January 16, 2019 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    When the first caravan was being covered during its Mexican journey a few weeks ago, I saw a striking photo on Breitbart of the column of marchers taken from slightly above and far away. It was very densely packed and confined in a road lined with fences and/or walls. Not one person was seen to be walking in the vast fields to either side of the road. This photo was obviously either digitally ginned up or was a real photo that had been heavily doctored. No column of marchers in human history has ever been disciplined enough or policed well enough not to have flankers and stragglers resting, walking, or easing themselves in bordering fields. Even a photo taken from a balloon in 1862 of a Confederate or Union division on the march in Virginia, if there is such a photo, would show fields distressed by this unusual and artificial passage of a great crowd, like how you can see an animal inside a constrictor after it’s been swallowed. The message of the fake photo was, of course, “these are not locusts. See how well disciplined they are. Respect them; fear them.”

  3. Razvan
    Posted January 17, 2019 at 5:29 am | Permalink

    Another exceptional analysis.

    Maybe the oldest example could be the Jewish invasion of Egipt with Joseph and his brood. Poor, dirty, begging for mercy yet full of hatred, greed, and envy.

    Also Angela Merkel can not be suspected of stupidity. She did open the borders on purpose and I suspect on orders. This former communist overthrow the European order in only one swift move! Too much for mere stupidity in a country with a smart and industrious people. If one takes a look at how submissive she looks before the former communist secret agent Vlad, then one have to ask a few questions.
    It is known that Merkel herself spoke about the dangers of multiculturalism/diversity during her political campaigns. Now, where stupidity ends and where the sabotage and treason start?

    You can’t explain away every blunder by stupidity. The communists used the diversity as an weapon against the people. They spread distrust and fear by simply mingling people from different regions, even they all are the same ethnicity and even the same social class.
    They knew very well. So Merkel surely knew what means few million foreigners brought in at once.

    My opinion is that every politician supporting mass migration knows very well what he is doing. Nothing can explain away the fact they want to weaken any independent and local ethno-social structure by mingling and mixing different peoples. That way they hope to maintain their own power structure. They simply exaggerated and didn’t know where to stop. The new power structure is given by the new majority and they become slowly deprecated and eliminated. The revenge is beautiful indeed.

  4. Renzo
    Posted January 17, 2019 at 7:07 pm | Permalink

    This is one of the most lucid pieces I’ve read on this site (or any).

    “Helplessness becomes a form of social dominance” is an inspired, succinct description of a most insidious trend in this long subversion process.

    “Guns don’t fire themselves. Using a machine gun is an act of will. Green marches cannot take place if there is political will to shoot. Green marches cannot succeed unless the target population has somehow lost its will to survive.”

    This implies an equivalence between the will to survive and the will to kill.

    Which, tragically, implies we will continue to lose ground to the tired, poor, huddled masses until our people can find the will to 1) discriminate solely on the basis of race 2) not just say “no” to, but end the life of the Other, every time he enters your territory uninvited.

    I think the green marches phenomenon reveals just how much of an “us or them” situation this is at the core.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    Here’s the Thing

    Trevor Lynch: Part Four of the Trilogy

    Graduate School with Heidegger

    It’s Okay to Be White


    The Enemy of Europe

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace